Fluid loss additives for cement slurries

Abstract
Methods for cementing in a subterranean zone, which use a cement composition that includes zeolite, cementitious material, proportioned fluid loss control additives and a mixing fluid. Cement compositions containing proportioned fluid loss control additives, and methods of making cement compositions containing proportioned fluid loss control additives.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present embodiment relates generally to methods and cement compositions for cementing in a subterranean zone, and more particularly, to cement fluid loss control additives, cement compositions containing the additives, and methods of using the cement compositions.


Hydraulic cement compositions are commonly utilized in subterranean well completion and remedial operations. For example, hydraulic cement compositions are used in primary cementing operations whereby strings of pipe such as casings and liners are cemented in well bores. In performing primary cementing, a hydraulic cement composition is pumped into the annular space between the walls of a well bore and the exterior surfaces of a pipe string disposed therein. The cement composition is permitted to set in the annular space, thereby forming an annular sheath of hardened substantially impermeable cement therein, which supports and positions the pipe string in the well bore and bonds the exterior surfaces of the pipe string to the walls of the well bore. Hydraulic cement compositions are also utilized in remedial cementing operations such as plugging highly permeable zones or fractures in well bores, plugging cracks or holes in pipe strings, and the like.


Fluid loss control agents are used in cement compositions to reduce fluid loss from the cement compositions to the permeable formations or zones into or through which the cement compositions are pumped.







DESCRIPTION

In carrying out certain methods disclosed herein, cementing is performed in a subterranean zone by placing a cement composition comprising a mixing fluid, zeolite, cementitious material, and proportioned fluid loss additives (FLAs) as described herein, into the subterranean zone and allowing the cement composition to set therein.


According to exemplary methods of sealing a wellbore, a cement composition is formed by mixing a cement mix, which includes a base blend and proportioned fluid loss additives (FLAs), with a mixing fluid. The cement composition is placed in the subterranean zone and allowed to set therein. The base blend used in such methods includes zeolite and at least one cementitious material, and the proportioned FLAs include at least a first fluid loss additive having a first molecular weight and at least one second fluid loss additive having a second molecular weight that is less than the first molecular weight. The first fluid loss additive will be hereafter referred to as the “high molecular weight FLA” and the second fluid loss additive will be hereafter referred to as the “low molecular weight FLA”.


According to certain methods disclosed herein, the proportionality of the FLAs can be described by a ratio. For example, the proportionality of the FLAs can be expressed as a ratio of the amounts of each FLA, where each amount is expressed as a weight percent of the total weight of the base blend (% bwob). Thus, in certain examples described herein, the proportionality of the FLAs can be described by a ratio of about 15:85, of a high molecular weight FLA to a low molecular weight FLA. In other examples, the amount of low molecular weight FLAs present in the base can be increased or decreased, with a complementary increase or decrease in the amount of high molecular weight FLAs. According to one such example, the amount of low molecular weight FLAs in the base blend decreases to about 0.75% bwob, and the amount of high molecular weight FLAs increases to about 0.25% bwob. In such an example, the proportionality of the FLAs can be described by a ratio of about 25:75 of high molecular weight FLAs to low molecular weight FLAs.


In another example, the proportionality of the FLAs can be expressed as a ratio of the amount of high molecular weight FLA(s) to the amount of low molecular weight FLA(s), irrespective of the amount each type contributes to the base blend. Thus, in certain examples described herein, the proportionality of the FLAs can be described as a ratio of about 1:5.67, meaning that the amount of low molecular weight FLAs present in the base blend is about 5.67 times the amount of high molecular weight FLAs present in the base blend. According to an example where the amount of low molecular weight FLAs present in the base blend has been decreased, such as to the 0.75% bwob described above, and the amount of high molecular weight FLAs has been increased, such as to 0.25% bwob described above, the proportionality of the FLAs can be described by a ratio of about 1:3 of high molecular weight FLAs to low molecular weight FLAs.


Yet another way to express the proportionality of the FLAs as a ratio is in terms of their molecular weights. According to certain methods, the high molecular weight FLA has a molecular weight in the range of from about 800,000 atomic mass units to about 1,200,000 atomic mass units, and the low molecular weight FLA has a molecular weight in the range of from about 100,000 atomic mass units to about 300,000 atomic mass units. Thus, in certain examples, the proportionality of the FLAs can be described as a ratio of about 12:1, meaning that the molecular weight of the high molecular weight FLA would be about 12 times the molecular weight of the low molecular weight FLA. In other examples described herein, the proportionality is described as a ratio of about 4:1, meaning that the molecular weight of the high molecular weight FLA is about 4 times the molecular weight of the low molecular weight FLA. In still other examples, the proportionality of the FLAs can be described by a ratio of about 2.66:1, meaning that the molecular weight of the high molecular weight FLA would be about 2.66 times the molecular weight of the low molecular weight FLA


In carrying out other methods disclosed herein, a cement mix is prepared by forming a base blend comprising zeolite and at least one cementitious material, and mixing the base blend with proportioned fluid loss additives as described herein.


Thus, cement compositions and cement mixes as disclosed herein include proportioned fluid loss additives (FLAs). In certain exemplary compositions and mixes, the FLAs are non-ionic water based soluble polymers. According to other examples, the FLAs are hydrophobically modified non-ionic water based soluble polymers. In certain examples described herein, the FLAs are unmodified hydroxyethylcelluloses. In still other examples, the FLAs are hydrophobically modified hydroxyethylcelluloses.


Exemplary cement mixes include a base blend and proportioned fluid loss additives. The base blend includes zeolite and at least one cementitious material. The proportioned fluid loss additives are as described above, that is, at least one high molecular weight FLA and at least one low molecular weight FLA, and where the high molecular weight FLA and the low molecular weight FLA are present in the base blend in a ratio of about 1:5.67. According to certain examples, the high molecular weight FLA comprises a hydroxyethylcellulose having a molecular weight in the range of from about 800,000 atomic mass units to about 1,200,000 atomic mass units, and the low molecular weight FLA comprises a hydroxyethylcellulose having a molecular weight in the range of from about 100,000 atomic mass units to about 300,000 atomic mass units.


A variety of cementitious materials can be used in the present methods, mixes and compositions, including but not limited to hydraulic cements. Hydraulic cements set and harden by reaction with water, and are typically comprised of calcium, aluminum, silicon, oxygen, and/or sulfur. Hydraulic cements include micronized cements, Portland cements, pozzolan cements, gypsum cements, aluminous cements, silica cements, and alkaline cements. According to preferred embodiments, the cementitious material comprises at least one API Portland cement. As used herein, the term API Portland cement means any cements of the type defined and described in API Specification 10, 5th Edition, Jul. 1, 1990, of the American Petroleum Institute (the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated as if reproduced in its entirety), which includes Classes A, B, C, G, and H. According to certain embodiments disclosed herein, the cementitious material comprises Class C cement. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the preferred amount of cementitious material is dependent on the type of cementing operation to be performed.


Zeolites are porous alumino-silicate minerals that may be either a natural or manmade material. Manmade zeolites are based on the same type of structural cell as natural zeolites and are composed of aluminosilicate hydrates having the same basic formula as given below. It is understood that as used in this application, the term “zeolite” means and encompasses all natural and manmade forms of zeolites. All zeolites are composed of a three-dimensional framework of SiO4 and AlO4 in a tetrahedron, which creates a very high surface area. Cations and water molecules are entrained into the framework. Thus, all zeolites may be represented by the crystallographic unit cell formula:

Ma/n[(AlO2)a(SiO2)b]·xH2O

where M represents one or more cations such as Na, K, Mg, Ca, Sr, Li or Ba for natural zeolites and NH4, CH3NH3, (CH3)3NH, (CH3)4N, Ga, Ge and P for manmade zeolites; n represents the cation valence; the ratio of b:a is in a range of from greater than or equal to 1 to less than or equal to 5; and x represents the moles of water entrained into the zeolite framework.


Preferred zeolites for use in the cement compositions prepared and used according to the present disclosure include analcime (hydrated sodium aluminum silicate), bikitaite (lithium aluminum silicate), brewsterite (hydrated strontium barium calcium aluminum silicate), chabazite (hydrated calcium aluminum silicate), clinoptilolitei (hydrated sodium aluminum silicate), faujasite (hydrated sodium potassium calcium magnesium aluminum silicate), harmotome (hydrated barium aluminum silicate), heulandite (hydrated sodium calcium aluminum silicate), laumontite (hydrated calcium aluminum silicate), mesolite (hydrated sodium calcium aluminum silicate), natrolite (hydrated sodium aluminum silicate), paulingite (hydrated potassium sodium calcium barium aluminum silicate), phillipsite (hydrated potassium sodium calcium aluminum silicate), scolecite (hydrated calcium aluminum silicate), stellerite (hydrated calcium aluminum silicate), stilbite (hydrated sodium calcium aluminum silicate) and thomsonite (hydrated sodium calcium aluminum silicate). In exemplary cement compositions prepared and used according to the present disclosure, the zeolite is selected from the group consisting of analcime, bikitaite, brewsterite, chabazite, clinoptilolite, faujasite, harmotome, heulandite, laumontite, mesolite, natrolite, paulingite, phillipsite, scolecite, stellerite, stilbite, and thomsonite. According to still other exemplary cement compositions described herein, the zeolite used in the cement compositions comprises clinoptilolite.


According to still other examples, in addition to proportioned fluid loss additives as described herein, the cement compositions, cement mixes and base blends described herein further comprise additives such as set retarding agents and set accelerating agents. Suitable set retarding agents include but are not limited to refined lignosulfonates. Suitable set accelerating agents include but are not limited to sodium sulfate, sodium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium carbonate, potassium sulfate, and potassium carbonate. Still other additives suitable for use in cement compositions comprising proportioned fluid loss additives as described herein include but are not limited to density modifying materials (e.g., silica flour, sodium silicate, microfine sand, iron oxides and manganese oxides), dispersing agents, strength retrogression control agents and viscosifying agents.


Water in the cement compositions according to the present embodiments is present in an amount sufficient to make a slurry of the desired density from the cement mix, and that is pumpable for introduction down hole. The water used to form a slurry can be any type of water, including fresh water, unsaturated salt solution, including brines and seawater, and saturated salt solution. According to some examples, the water is present in the cement composition in an amount of about 22% to about 200% by weight of the base blend of a cement mix. According to other examples, the water is present in the cement composition in an amount of from about 40% to about 180% by weight of the base blend of a cement mix. According to still other examples, the water is present in the cement composition in an amount of from about 90% to about 160% by weight of the base blend of a cement mix.


The following examples are illustrative of the methods and compositions discussed above.


EXAMPLE 1

The following describes exemplary cement compositions comprising proportioned fluid loss control additives as described herein, and the efficacy of such proportioned fluid loss control additives in such compositions.


Nine cement compositions (Nos. 1–9) comprising proportioned fluid loss control additives were prepared from the ingredients described in Table 1A.


















TABLE 1A






No. 1
No. 2
No. 3
No. 4
No. 5
No. 6
No. 7
No. 8
No. 9
























Base Blend











Cement
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60


(wt %)


Zeolite
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40


(wt %)


Additive


Na2CO3
2.2
0
0
2.2
0
0
2.2
0
0


(% bwob)


Na2SO4
4.4
0
0
4.4
0
0
4.4
0
0


(% bwob)


HR-5
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0


(% bwob)


Carbitron 20
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85


(% bwob)


FWCA
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


(% bwob)


Mixing Fluid


Water
94.59
94.59
94.59
126.53
126.53
126.53
150.45
150.45
150.45


(% bwob)


D-Air 3000L
0.328
0.328
0.328
0.328
0.328
0.328
0.328
0.328
0.328


(1/sk)


Density


(kg/m3)
1500
1500
1500
1400
1400
1400
1350
1350
1350









Cement composition Nos. 1–9 were prepared according to procedures described in API Specification RP 10B, 22nd edition, 1997, of the American Petroleum Institute, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Generally, the procedure involved preparing a base blend by dry-mixing a cementitious material and zeolite by hand in a glass jar.


The amount of zeolite and cement comprising the base blend is as described in Table 1A, where “wt %” indicates the weight percent contributed to the total weight of the base blend. The cementitious material used in each base blend was Class C. Clinoptilolite, which is commercially available from C2C Zeolite Corporation of Calgary, Canada, was used as the zeolite in each base blend.


Sodium carbonate and sodium sulfate, in the amounts listed in Table 1A, where “% bwob” indicates a percentage based on the total weight of the base blend, were dry-mixed into the base blends of those compositions that were to undergo fluid loss testing at temperatures equal to or less than about 30° C. (i.e., Nos. 1, 4 and 7) to accelerate the set of the cement at such temperatures.


HR-5, which is the tradename for a retarder comprising a refined lignosulfonate commercially available from Halliburton Energy Services, was dry-mixed into the base blends of cement composition Nos. 3 and 6 in the amount (% bwob) listed in Table 1A. The retarder served to slow the set time that would otherwise occur at the conditions (density and fluid loss test temperature) of the compositions.


Proportioned fluid loss additives (FLAs) were also dry-mixed into the base blends used for cement composition Nos. 1–9. In the examples illustrated in Table 1A, the proportioned fluid loss additives were Carbitron 20 and FWCA, which were dry-mixed into the base blend in the amounts (% bwob) as listed in Table 1A. Carbitron 20 is an unmodified non-hydrophobic hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) having a molecular weight of about 225,000 atomic mass units, (amu), and is commercially available from Dow Chemical. FWCA is an unmodified non-hydrophobic hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) having a molecular weight of about 1,000,000 amu, and is commercially available from Halliburton Energy Services.


The respective cement-zeolite base blends, and any accelerating additives, retarders, and proportioned fluid loss additives, comprised cement mixes from which cement composition Nos. 1–9 were formed.


Each cement composition was formed by adding the cement mix to a mixing fluid being maintained in a Waring blender at 4000 RPM. The cement mix was added to the mixing fluid over a 15 second period. When all of the cement mix was added to the mixing fluid, a cover was placed on the blender and mixing was continued at about 12,000 RPM for about 35 seconds. For each cement composition, the mixing fluid included water in the amounts as indicated in Table 1A. In certain compositions, the mixing fluid also included D-Air 3000L as reported in Table 1A. The amount of water is reported in Table 1A as a % bwob, and the amount of D-Air 3000L is reported in “1/sk”, which indicates liters of D-Air 3000L per sack of cement composition. D-Air 3000L is the tradename for a defoaming agent comprising polypropylene glycol, particulate hydrophobic silica and a liquid diluent, which is commercially available from Halliburton Energy Services, Duncan, Okla. The cement mix temperature and mixing fluid temperature were both 24° C. (75° F.).


Cement composition Nos. 1–9 illustrate cement compositions comprising proportioned fluid loss additives (FLAs). The proportionality of the FLAs can be expressed as a ratio of the amounts of each FLA, where each amount is expressed as a weight percent of the total weight of the base blend (% bwob). Thus, in this Example 1, the proportionality of the FLAs, expressed as a ratio of the amounts (% bwob) of each type of FLA, can be described by a ratio of about 15:85, of a high molecular weight FLA to a low molecular weight FLA. In other examples, the amount of low molecular weight FLAs present in the base can be increased or decreased, with a complementary increase or decrease in the amount of high molecular weight FLAs. According to one such example, the amount of low molecular weight FLAs in the base blend decreases to about 0.75% bwob, and the amount of high molecular weight FLAs increases to about 0.25% bwob. In such an example, the proportionality of the FLAs can be described by a ratio of about 25:75 of high molecular weight FLAs to low molecular weight FLAs.


The proportionality of the FLAs can also be expressed as a ratio of the amount of high molecular weight FLA(s) to the amount of low molecular weight FLA(s), irrespective of the amount each type contributes to the base blend. Thus, in this Example 1, the proportionality of the FLAs can be described as a ratio of about 1:5.67, meaning that the amount of low molecular weight FLAs present in the base blend is about 5.67 times the amount of high molecular weight FLAs present in the base blend. According to an example where the amount of low molecular weight FLAs present in the base blend has been decreased, such as to the 0.75% bwob described above, and the amount of high molecular weight FLAs has been increased, such as to 0.25% bwob described above, the proportionality of the FLAs can be described by a ratio of about 1:3 of high molecular weight FLAs to low molecular weight FLAs.


Yet another way to express the proportionality of the FLAs is in terms of their molecular weights. Thus, in this Example 1, where the high molecular weight FLA comprises an unmodified non-hydrophobic hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) having a molecular weight of about 1,000,000 atomic mass units (amu) and the low molecular weight FLA comprises an unmodified non-hydrophobic HEC having a molecular weight of about 225,000 amu, the proportionality of the FLAs can be described as a ratio of about 4:1, meaning that the molecular weight of the high molecular weight FLA(s) present in the base blend is about 4 times the molecular weight of the low molecular weight FLA(s) in the base blend. In other examples, the molecular weight of the low molecular weight FLAs can be in the range of from about 100,000 amu to about 300,000 amu, while the molecular weight of the high molecular weight FLA can be in the range or from about 800,000 amu to about 1,200,000 amu. Thus, according to an example where the high molecular weight FLA has a molecular weight of about 1,200,000 amu and the low molecular weight FLA about 100,000 amu, the proportionality of the FLAs can be described by a ratio of about 12:1, meaning that the molecular weight of the high molecular weight FLA is about 12 times the molecular weight of the low molecular weight FLA. In an example where the high molecular weight FLA has a molecular weight of about 800,000 amu and the low molecular weight FLA has a molecular weight of about 300,000 amu, the proportionality of the FLAs can be described by a ratio of about 2.66:1, meaning that the molecular weight of the high molecular weight is about 2.66 times the molecular weight of the low molecular weight FLA.


Referring now to Table 1B, rheological data and fluid loss measurements of cement composition Nos. 1–9 are reported.













TABLE 1B









Rheological Data
API Fluid
API Fluid











Dial Readings (cp)
Loss Test
Loss



















Temp.
600
300
200
100
60
30
6
3
Temperature
(mL/30


No.
(° C.)
rpm
rpm
rpm
rpm
rpm
rpm
rpm
rpm
° C.(° F.)
min)





















1
30
n/a
196
145
89
65
47
34
32
30(86) 
84


2
50
245
175
131
84
62
43
21
18
50(122)
76


3
80
99
60
39
22
15
10
7
6
80(176)
100


4
30
157
101
75
47
34
25
19
18
30(86) 
134


5
50
105
66
48
28
19
12
5
4
50(122)
150


6
80
57
38
23
12
7
5
4
2
80(176)
176


7
30
108
65
46
26
21
15
10
8
30(86) 
227


8
50
57
36
25
15
10
6
1
0.5
50(122)
243


9
80
54
36
30
25
17
11
8
7
80(176)
364









The rheological data was determined using a Fann Model 35 viscometer. The viscosity was taken as the measurement of the dial reading on the Farm Model 35 at the different rotational speeds as indicated in 600 to 3 RPM, and at the temperatures as indicated in Table 1B. There are a number of theoretical models known to those of ordinary skill in the art that can be used to convert the values from the dial readings at the different RPM's into viscosity (centipoises). In addition, different viscometer models use different RPM values, thus, in some instances, a measurement is not available at a particular RPM value.


The rheological data was determined according to the procedures set forth in Section 12 of the API Specification RP 10B, 22nd Edition, 1997, of the American Petroleum Institute (the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated as if reproduced in its entirety). The foregoing API procedure was modified in that the initial reading at 300 RPM was taken after 60 seconds continuous rotation at that speed. Dial readings at 200, 100, 60, 30, 6 and 3 were then recorded in descending order at 20-second intervals. The final reading at 600 RPM was taken after 60 seconds continuous rotation at that speed.


The fluid loss testing was conducted according to procedures set forth in Section 10 of API Recommended Practice 10B, 22nd Edition, 1997, of the American Petroleum Institute (the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated as if reproduced in its entirety).


The procedures followed were those for testing at temperatures less than 1940F, with atmospheric pressure conditioning, and a static fluid loss cell. Generally, however, 475 cc of each composition was placed into the container of an atmospheric pressure consistometer commercially available from Howco. The temperatures of the compositions were adjusted to the test temperatures indicated in Table 1B, (30, 50 and 80° C.). The test temperatures were arbitrarily chosen, based on values that are often encountered as bottom hole circulating temperatures (BHCTs) of a variety of types of wells.


After about 20 minutes, the composition to be tested was stirred, and a 5 inch standard fluid loss cell, which was prepared according to the aforemetioned Section 10 of API Recommended Practice 10B, was filled. The test was started within 30 seconds of closing the cell by application of nitrogen applied through the top valve. Filtrate was collected and the volume and time were recorded if blow out occurred in less than 30 minutes or volume recorded at 30 minutes if no blow out occurred. Thus, to determine the fluid loss data reported in Table 1B, values were calculated as twice the volume of filtrate multiplied by 5.477 and divided by the square root of time if blowout occurred, and as twice the volume of filtrate if blowout did not occur within 30 minutes.


The measured fluid loss values (mL of fluid lost/30 min) of cement composition Nos. 1–9 illustrate that proportioned fluid loss additives provide effective fluid loss control to cement compositions having a variety of densities, and at temperatures at least up to 80° C. (176° F.). In addition, the Theological data of cement composition Nos. 1–9 is within acceptable parameters.


Although only a few exemplary embodiments of this invention have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many other modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of cementing in a subterranean zone comprising: forming a cement composition by mixing a cement mix comprising a base blend and proportioned fluid loss additives with a mixing fluid, which base blend comprises zeolite in an amount of at least 20 weight percent and at least one cementitious material, andwhich proportioned fluid loss additives comprise at least a first fluid loss additive having a first molecular weight and at least a second fluid loss additive having a second molecular weight, which second molecular weight is less than the first molecular weight, andwhich first fluid loss additive is present in an amount that is less than the amount of the second fluid loss additive;placing the cement composition into the subterranean zone; andallowing the cement composition to set therein.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the zeolite is represented by the formula: Ma/n[(AlO2)a(SiO2)]·xH2O
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the zeolite is selected from the group consisting of analcime, bikitaite, brewsterite, chabazite, clinoptilolite, faujasite, harmotome, heulandite, laumontite, mesolite, natrolite, paulingite, phillipsite, scolecite, stellerite, stilbite, and thomsonite.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the base blend comprises from about 20 to about 60 weight percent zeolite.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the base blend comprises about 40 weight percent zeolite.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the first molecular weight is about twelve times as much as the second molecular weight.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the first molecular weight is about four times as much as the second molecular weight.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the first molecular weight is about 2.66 times as much as the second molecular weight.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the first molecular weight is in the range of from about 800,000 atomic mass units to about 1,200,000 atomic mass units, and the second fluid loss additive comprises a hydroxyethylcellulose having a molecular weight in the range of from about 100,000 atomic mass units to about 300,000 atomic mass units.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the first molecular weight is about 1,000,000 atomic mass units and the second molecular weight is about 225,000 atomic mass units.
  • 11. The method of claim 1 wherein the first fluid loss additive is present in the cement mix in an amount of at least about 0.15% by weight of the base blend, and the second fluid loss additive is present in the cement mix in an amount of at least about 0.85% by weight of the base blend.
  • 12. The method of claim 1 wherein the first fluid loss additive is present in the cement mix in an amount of at least about 0.25% by weight of the base blend, and the second fluid loss additive is present in the cement mix in an amount of at least about 0.75% by weight of the base blend.
  • 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the first fluid loss and the second fluid loss additive are present in the base blend in a ratio of about 1:3.
  • 14. The method of claim 1 wherein the proportioned fluid loss additives comprise non-ionic water based soluble polymers.
  • 15. The method of claim 1 wherein the proportioned fluid loss additives comprise hydrophobically modified non-ionic water based soluble polymers.
  • 16. The method of claim 1 wherein the proportioned fluid loss additives comprise hydroxyethylcelluloses.
  • 17. The method of claim 1 wherein the proportioned fluid loss additives comprise hydrophobically modified hydroxyethylcelluloses.
  • 18. The method of claim 1 wherein the first fluid loss additive comprises a hydroxyethylcellulose having a molecular weight in the range of from about 800,000 atomic mass units to about 1,200,000 atomic mass units, and the second fluid loss additive comprises a hydroxyethylcellulose having a molecular weight in the range of from about 100,000 atomic mass units to about 300,000 atomic mass units.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 wherein the first molecular weight is about 1,000,000 atomic mass units and the second molecular weight is about 225,000 atomic mass units.
  • 20. The method of claim 1 wherein the mixing fluid comprises water.
  • 21. The method of claim 20 wherein the mixing fluid further comprises a defoaming agent.
  • 22. The method of claim 1 wherein the water is present in a range of about 22% to about 200% by weight of the base blend.
  • 23. The method of claim 1 wherein the water is present in a range of about 40% to about 180% by weight of the base blend.
  • 24. The method of claim 1 wherein the water is present in a range of about 90% to about 160% by weight of the base blend.
  • 25. The method of claim 1 wherein the base blend comprises at least one cementitious material selected from the group consisting of micronized cement, Portland cement, pozzolan cement, gypsum cement, aluminous cement, silica cement, and alkaline cement.
  • 26. The method of claim 1 wherein the cement composition formed has a density in a range of from about 1350 kg/m3 to about 1500 kg/m3.
  • 27. The method of claim 1 wherein the cement composition further comprises at least one accelerating additive.
  • 28. The method of claim 27 wherein the at least one accelerating additive is selected from the group consisting of sodium sulfate, sodium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium carbonate, potassium sulfate, and potassium carbonate.
  • 29. The method of claim 27 wherein the least one accelerating additive is present in an amount of about 0.5% to about 10% by weight of the base blend.
  • 30. The method of claim 29 wherein the accelerating additive is present in the cement mix in an amount of from about 2% to about 8% by weight of the base blend.
  • 31. The method of claim 1 wherein the first fluid loss and the second fluid loss additive are present in the base blend in a ratio of about 1:5.67.
  • 32. A method of cementing in a subterranean zone comprising: placing a cement composition into a subterranean zone; andallowing the cement composition to set therein,wherein the cement composition comprises a base blend, proportioned fluid loss additives, and a mixing fluid, which base blend comprises zeolite in an amount of at least about 20 weight percent, and cementitious material;which proportioned fluid loss additives comprise at least a first fluid loss additive having a first molecular weight and at least a second fluid loss additive having a second molecular weight, which second molecular weight is less than the first molecular weight, andwhich second fluid loss additive is present in an amount that is at least about three times greater than the amount of the first fluid loss additive.
  • 33. The method of claim 32 wherein the zeolite is represented by the formula: Ma/n[(AlO2)a(SiO2)]·xH2O
  • 34. The method of claim 32 wherein the zeolite is selected from the group consisting of analcime, bikitaite, brewsterite, chabazite, clinoptilolite, faujasite, harmotome, heulandite, laumontite, mesolite, natrolite, paulingite, phillipsite, scolecite, stellerite, stilbite, and thomsonite.
  • 35. The method of claim 32 wherein the first molecular weight is at least about 2.66 times as much as the second molecular weight.
  • 36. The method of claim 32 wherein the first molecular weight is in the range of from about 800,000 atomic mass units to about 1,200,000 atomic mass units, and the second molecular weight is in the range of from about 100,000 atomic mass units to about 300,000 atomic mass units.
  • 37. The method of claim 32 wherein the first fluid loss additive is present in an amount of at least about 0.15% by weight of the base blend, and the second fluid loss additive is present in an amount of at least about 0.85% by weight of the base blend.
  • 38. The method of claim 32 wherein the first fluid loss additive is present in an amount of at least about 0.25% by weight of the base blend, and the second fluid loss additive is present in an amount of at least about 0.75% by weight of the base blend.
  • 39. The method of claim 32 wherein the proportioned fluid loss additives are selected from the group consisting of non-ionic water based soluble polymers, hydrophobically modified non-ionic water based soluble polymers, hydroxyethylcelluloses and hydrophobically modified hydroxyethylcelluloses.
  • 40. The method of claim 32 wherein the first fluid loss additive comprises a hydroxyethylcellulose having a molecular weight in the range of from about 800,000 atomic mass units to about 1,200,000 atomic mass units, and the second fluid loss additive comprises a hydroxyethylcellulose having a molecular weight in the range of from about 100,000 atomic mass units to about 300,000 atomic mass units.
  • 41. The method of claim 32 wherein the mixing fluid comprises water.
  • 42. The method of claim 41 wherein the mixing fluid further comprises a defoaming agent.
  • 43. The method of claim 32 wherein the base blend comprises at least one cementitious material selected from the group consisting of micronized cement, Portland cement, pozzolan cement, gypsum cement, aluminous cement, silica cement, and alkaline cement.
  • 44. The method of claim 32 wherein the cement composition further comprises at least one accelerating additive.
  • 45. The method of claim 44 wherein the at least one accelerating additive is selected from the group consisting of sodium sulfate, sodium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium carbonate, potassium sulfate, and potassium carbonate.
  • 46. A method of cementing in a subterranean zone comprising: placing a cement composition into a subterranean zone; andallowing the cement composition to set therein,wherein the cement composition comprises a base blend, proportioned fluid loss additives, and a mixing fluid, which base blend comprises zeolite in an amount of at least about 20 weight percent and cementitious material; andwhich proportioned fluid loss additives comprise at least a first fluid loss additive having a first molecular weight and at least a second fluid loss additive having a second molecular weight, which second molecular weight is less than the first molecular weight, andwherein the second fluid loss additive is present in an amount that is greater than the amount of the first fluid loss additive.
  • 47. The method of claim 46 wherein the zeolite is represented by the formula: Ma/n[(AlO2)a(SiO2)b]·xH2O
  • 48. The method of claim 46 wherein the zeolite is selected from the group consisting of analcime, bikitaite, brewsterite, chabazite, clinoptilolite, faujasite, harmotome, heulandite, laumontite, mesolite, natrolite, paulingite, phillipsite, scolecite, stellerite, stilbite, and thomsonite.
  • 49. The method of claim 46 wherein the base blend comprises from about 20 to about 60 weight percent zeolite.
  • 50. The method of claim 46 wherein the base blend comprises about 40 weight percent zeolite.
  • 51. The method of claim 46 wherein the first molecular weight is at least about 2.66 times as much as the second molecular weight.
  • 52. The method of claim 46 wherein the first fluid loss additive is present in an amount of at least about 0.15% by weight of the base blend, and the second fluid loss additive is present in an amount of at least about 0.85% by weight of the base blend.
  • 53. The method of claim 46 wherein the first fluid loss additive is present in an amount of at least about 0.25% by weight of the base blend, and the second fluid loss additive is present in an amount of at least about 0.75% by weight of the base blend.
  • 54. The method of claim 46 wherein the first fluid loss additive and the second fluid loss additive are present in the base blend in a ratio of about 1:5.67.
  • 55. The method of claim 46 wherein the proportioned fluid loss additives comprise non-ionic water based soluble polymers or hydrophobically modified non-ionic water based soluble polymers.
  • 56. The method of claim 46 wherein the proportioned fluid loss additives comprise hydroxyethylcelluloses or hydrophobically modified hydroxyethylcelluloses.
  • 57. The method of claim 46 wherein the mixing fluid comprises water.
  • 58. The method of claim 57 wherein the mixing fluid further comprises a defoaming agent.
  • 59. The method of claim 46 wherein the base blend comprises at least one cementitious material selected from the group consisting of micronized cement, Portland cement, pozzolan cement, gypsum cement, aluminous cement, silica cement, and alkaline cement.
  • 60. The method of claim 46 wherein the cement composition further comprises at least one accelerating additive.
  • 61. The method of claim 60 wherein the at least one accelerating additive is selected from the group consisting of sodium sulfate, sodium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium carbonate, potassium sulfate, and potassium carbonate.
  • 62. The method of claim 60 wherein the accelerating additive is present in an amount of from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight of the base blend.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of prior application Ser. No. 10/795,158 filed Mar. 5, 2004, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, which is a continuation-in-part of prior application Ser. No. 10/738,199 filed Dec. 17, 2003, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, which is a continuation-in-part of prior application Ser. No. 10/727,370 filed Dec. 4, 2003, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, which is a continuation-in-part of prior application Ser. No. 10/686,098 filed Oct. 15, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,964,302, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, which is a continuation-in-part of prior application Ser. No. 10/623,443 filed Jul. 18, 2003, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, and which is a continuation-in-part of prior application Ser. No. 10/315,415, filed Dec. 10, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,989,057, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (145)
Number Name Date Kind
1943584 Cross Jan 1934 A
2094316 Cross Sep 1937 A
2131338 Vail Sep 1938 A
2349049 Means May 1944 A
2727001 Rowe Dec 1955 A
2848051 Williams Aug 1958 A
3047493 Rosenberg Jul 1962 A
3065170 Dumbauld et al. Nov 1962 A
3293040 Shaler, Jr. et al. Dec 1966 A
3359225 Weisend Dec 1967 A
3694152 Sersale et al. Sep 1972 A
3781225 Schwartz Dec 1973 A
3884302 Messenger May 1975 A
3887385 Quist et al. Jun 1975 A
3888998 Sampson et al. Jun 1975 A
3963508 Masaryk Jun 1976 A
4054462 Stude Oct 1977 A
4141843 Watson Feb 1979 A
4217229 Watson Aug 1980 A
4311607 Kaeser Jan 1982 A
4363736 Block Dec 1982 A
4368134 Kaeser Jan 1983 A
4372876 Kulprathipanja et al. Feb 1983 A
4435216 Diehl et al. Mar 1984 A
4444668 Walker et al. Apr 1984 A
4468334 Cox et al. Aug 1984 A
4474667 Block Oct 1984 A
4482379 Dibrell et al. Nov 1984 A
4515216 Childs et al. May 1985 A
4515635 Rao et al. May 1985 A
4530402 Smith et al. Jul 1985 A
4536297 Loftin et al. Aug 1985 A
4548734 Chaux et al. Oct 1985 A
4552591 Millar Nov 1985 A
4555269 Rao et al. Nov 1985 A
4557763 George et al. Dec 1985 A
4632186 Boncan et al. Dec 1986 A
4650593 Slngerland Mar 1987 A
4676317 Fry et al. Jun 1987 A
4703801 Fry et al. Nov 1987 A
4717488 Seheult et al. Jan 1988 A
4772307 Kiss et al. Sep 1988 A
4784693 Kirkland et al. Nov 1988 A
4818288 Aignesberger et al. Apr 1989 A
4888120 Mueller et al. Dec 1989 A
4986989 Sirosita et al. Jan 1991 A
5121795 Ewert et al. Jun 1992 A
5123487 Harris et al. Jun 1992 A
5125455 Harris et al. Jun 1992 A
5127473 Harris et al. Jul 1992 A
5151131 Burkhalter et al. Sep 1992 A
5238064 Dahl et al. Aug 1993 A
5252554 Mueller et al. Oct 1993 A
5301752 Cowan et al. Apr 1994 A
5307876 Cowan et al. May 1994 A
5314022 Cowan et al. May 1994 A
5340860 Brake et al. Aug 1994 A
5346012 Heathman et al. Sep 1994 A
5383967 Chase Jan 1995 A
5435846 Tatematsu et al. Jul 1995 A
5464060 Hale et al. Nov 1995 A
5494513 Fu et al. Feb 1996 A
5501276 Weaver et al. Mar 1996 A
5529624 Riegler Jun 1996 A
5588489 Chatterji et al. Dec 1996 A
5626665 Barger et al. May 1997 A
5680900 Nguyen et al. Oct 1997 A
5711383 Terry et al. Jan 1998 A
5716910 Totten et al. Feb 1998 A
5759964 Shuchart et al. Jun 1998 A
5788762 Barger et al. Aug 1998 A
5789352 Carpenter et al. Aug 1998 A
5807810 Blezard et al. Sep 1998 A
5851960 Totten et al. Dec 1998 A
5866517 Carpenter et al. Feb 1999 A
5913364 Sweatman Jun 1999 A
5964692 Blezard et al. Oct 1999 A
5990052 Harris Nov 1999 A
6060434 Sweatman et al. May 2000 A
6063738 Chatterji et al. May 2000 A
6070664 Dalrymple et al. Jun 2000 A
6138759 Chatterji et al. Oct 2000 A
6145591 Boncan et al. Nov 2000 A
6149724 Ulibarri et al. Nov 2000 A
6167967 Sweatman Jan 2001 B1
6170575 Reddy et al. Jan 2001 B1
6171386 Sabins Jan 2001 B1
6182758 Vijn Feb 2001 B1
6209646 Reddy et al. Apr 2001 B1
6213213 van Batenburg Apr 2001 B1
6230804 Mueller et al. May 2001 B1
6235809 Arias et al. May 2001 B1
6245142 Reddy et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258757 Sweatman et al. Jul 2001 B1
6283213 Chan Sep 2001 B1
6315042 Griffith et al. Nov 2001 B1
6372694 Osinga et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379456 Heathman et al. Apr 2002 B1
6390197 Maroy May 2002 B1
6405801 Vijn et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409819 Ko Jun 2002 B1
6457524 Roddy Oct 2002 B1
6475275 Nebesnak et al. Nov 2002 B1
6478869 Reddy et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488091 Weaver et al. Dec 2002 B1
6494951 Reddy et al. Dec 2002 B1
6508305 Brannon et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508306 Reddy et al. Jan 2003 B1
6524384 Griffith et al. Feb 2003 B1
6555505 King et al. Apr 2003 B1
6565647 Day et al. May 2003 B1
6566310 Chan May 2003 B1
6572698 Ko Jun 2003 B1
6610139 Reddy et al. Aug 2003 B1
6616753 Reddy et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626243 Boncan Sep 2003 B1
6645289 Sobolev et al. Nov 2003 B1
6660080 Reddy et al. Dec 2003 B1
6702044 Reddy et al. Mar 2004 B1
6722434 Reddy et al. Apr 2004 B1
6767868 Dawson et al. Jul 2004 B1
6832652 Dillenbeck et al. Dec 2004 B1
6840319 Chatterji et al. Jan 2005 B1
6889767 Reddy et al. May 2005 B1
6964302 Luke et al. Nov 2005 B1
20010014651 Reddy et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020077390 Gonnon et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020091177 Gonnon et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020117090 Ku Aug 2002 A1
20020157575 DiLullo et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030153466 Allen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030203996 Gonnon et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040007162 Morioka et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040040475 Roij Mar 2004 A1
20040107877 Getzlaf et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040108113 Luke et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040112600 Luke et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040188091 Luke et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040188092 Luke et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040244977 Luke et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040262000 Morgan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040262001 Caveny et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050000734 Getzlaf et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050034864 Caveny et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050133222 Arias et al. Jun 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (17)
Number Date Country
2153372 Jan 1996 CA
0 802 253 Oct 1997 EP
0 895 971 Feb 1999 EP
0 1260 491 Nov 2002 EP
1 428 805 Jun 2004 EP
763.998 Nov 1933 FR
1469954 Apr 1977 GB
2 353 523 Feb 2001 GB
52117316 Jan 1977 JP
6121947 Jan 1986 JP
07 003254 Jan 1995 JP
1011487 Apr 1998 JP
1373781 Feb 1988 SU
WO 9854108 Dec 1998 WO
PCT 01070646 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0170646 Sep 2001 WO
WO 2005059301 Jun 2005 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040244977 A1 Dec 2004 US
Continuation in Parts (6)
Number Date Country
Parent 10795158 Mar 2004 US
Child 10816034 US
Parent 10738199 Dec 2003 US
Child 10795158 US
Parent 10727370 Dec 2003 US
Child 10738199 US
Parent 10686098 Oct 2003 US
Child 10727370 US
Parent 10623443 Jul 2003 US
Child 10686098 US
Parent 10315415 Dec 2002 US
Child 10623443 US