This application relates to pouches for storing fluids.
Sealed plastic pouches are used to store a range of liquids, fluids, or semi-fluids (referred to as “fluids”) such as syrup for soft drinks, laundry detergent, orange juice, paint, soap, glue etc. These sealed pouches may include a port. A user opens the port and connects a tube to the opened port (or if no port exists, then the user may puncture the pouch with the tube). The other end of the tube links to a pump. The pump extracts the fluid from the pouch and directs the fluid to a dispenser (e.g., a soda-fountain, a nozzle, etc.). A pump is not necessary. The fluid may be squeezed out of the pouch by air pressure on the exterior of the pouch or by gravity.
Pouches typically include a top flexible sheet joined with a bottom flexible sheet. Fluid occupies space between the top and bottom sheets. The pump and/or the port prevents ambient air from replacing pumped fluid. Thus, as the pump extracts fluid from the pouch, the top and bottom sheets wrinkle and the space between the top and bottom sheets shrinks.
Once the space between the top and bottom sheets has shrunk to a certain extent and a sufficient number of wrinkles have been introduced, the pump can no longer extract fluid from the pouch. The pouch is now obsolete. The user discards the obsolete pouch and attaches a fresh pouch. Fluid remaining in the obsolete pouch is wasted. Many existing pouches become obsolete with 20% or more of the original mass of fluid remaining.
Accordingly, there is a need for new pouches with properties that delay obsolescence until a greater amount of the original fluid has been extracted.
Various embodiments of the present disclosure solve the above problems by providing a pouch for holding fluid, the pouch including: (a) a first polymeric sheet including a first inner body and a first outer surface, the first inner body including a first inner surface and inner microstructure extending from the first inner surface, the first inner body defining an aerial microstructure surface area density (AMSAD) between 1% and 15%; (b) a second polymeric sheet including a second inner surface and a second outer surface.
The second polymeric sheet may be joined with the first polymeric sheet such that the first inner body and the second inner surface form an air-tight fluid chamber therebetween. The second polymeric sheet may lack microstructure extending from the second inner surface. The first inner surface, the first outer surface, the second inner surface, and the second outer surface may be smooth and non-recessed.
Some embodiments of the disclosed pouch enable 99% mass extraction of stored fluid via some or all of the above-described techniques including extraction via a pump, via air pressure on the exterior of the pouch, or via gravity.
For a better understanding of the invention, reference may be made to embodiments shown in the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale and related elements may be omitted, or in some instances proportions may have been exaggerated, so as to emphasize and clearly illustrate the novel features described herein. In addition, system components can be variously arranged, as known in the art. Further, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
While the invention may be embodied in various forms, there are shown in the drawings, and will hereinafter be described, some exemplary and non-limiting embodiments, with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered an exemplification of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the specific embodiments illustrated.
In this application, the use of the disjunctive is intended to include the conjunctive. The use of definite or indefinite articles is not intended to indicate cardinality. In particular, a reference to “the” object or “a” and “an” object is intended to denote also one of a possible plurality of such objects. Further, the conjunction “or” may be used to convey features that are simultaneously present, as one option, and mutually exclusive alternatives as another option. In other words, the conjunction “or” should be understood to include “and/or” as one option and “either/or” as another option. The claims may include dimensions and numeric values. It should be appreciated that such dimensions and numeric values are approximate unless otherwise stated. Approximate includes a tolerance of ±10%.
First or top sheet 2 may be heat sealed to second or bottom sheet 3 about an outer perimeter 5 of pouch 1. Top sheet 2 and bottom sheet 3 may be rectangular or any other geometric shape (e.g., circular, oval-shaped, etc.). In
Port 4 may include a base 41 and a conduit 42. Base 41 may have a greater outer diameter than conduit 42. Port 4 may be connected to top sheet 2, bottom sheet 3, or both sheets.
With continued reference to
Although
As shown in
With reference to
The disclosed embodiments do not guarantee 100% fluid extraction from pouch 1 before obsolescence. The disclosed embodiments, however, enable a greater percentage of fluid to be extracted before obsolescence, compared with existing pouches. As an illustrative example, one embodiment of pouch 1 may enable a certain capacity pump to extract 99% of fluid (e.g., soft-drink syrup) before obsolescence while an existing pouch may only allow the same capacity pump to only extract 70% of the same fluid before obsolescence.
With reference to
Returning to
With reference to
Bottom sheet 3 includes an aerial microstructure surface area density (AMSAD), which is: [(total surface area of microstructure, when viewed from a top plan perspective)/(total surface area of the inner body, when viewed from a top plan perspective)]. An example top plan perspective is shown in
Thus, the AMSAD of bottom sheet 3 is approximately: [(R2*pi)*(the total number of microstructure 11)]/[W*L]=[R2*pi*W*L]/[X2*W*L]=[R2*pi]/[X2]. It was surprisingly discovered that a smaller AMSAD improves fluid evacuation from pouch 1. More specifically, an AMSAD between the range of 1% to 21% counter-intuitively performs better than an AMSAD of less than 1% or greater than 21%. Thus, according to preferred embodiments, bottom sheet 3 has an AMSAD of between 5% and 15% or 5% to 9%.
According to preferred embodiments, bottom sheet 3 has a thickness T of 0.057 to 0.1 mm, and microstructure 11 has a radius of 0.10 to 0.20 mm, a first pitch X of 0.8 mm to 1.2 mm, a second pitch Y of 0.8 mm to 1.2 mm and a contact angle A of 88 to 107 degrees. According to one of these preferred embodiments, microstructure 11 has a radius of 0.15 mm, a first pitch of 1 mm, a second pitch of 1 mm, and a contact angle of 90 degrees. According to the same embodiment, bottom sheet 3 has an AMSAD of approximately 7%. According to these preferred embodiments, the total volume of microstructure 11 is 5 to 21% of the total volume of bottom sheet 3 excluding microstructure 11.
In some examples, a change in contact angle may alter the effectiveness of the microstructure. An experiment was run using four microstructures having different contact angles. Bags including microstructures with each respective contact angle were filled with liquid and evacuated. Then a percent evacuated based on weight before and after was measured for each bag/contact angle. The results are shown in Table 1. As can be seen, a relationship between contact angle and percent evacuated can be used to select an appropriate microstructure.
According to some embodiments, bottom sheet 3 and/or top sheet 2 have a thickness T of 12 microns to 600 microns or 2.5 mm.
Although AMSAD was described with reference to the length and width of bottom sheet 3, it should be appreciated that in cases where microstructure 11 only occupies a central portion 31a of bottom sheet 3, the relevant length and width in the AMSAD calculation are the length and width of central portion 31a (assuming central portion 31a is rectangular, which need not be the case) or the multiple central portions 31a (if multiple central portions 31a exist).
The especially preferred embodiment of bottom sheet 3 was tested with a stable Newtonian syrup having a resting viscosity ranging from 20 centipoise to 65 centipoise at 21 degrees Celsius. A pouch 1 was formed from bottom sheet 3, including microstructure 11, and a smooth top sheet 2. Both bottom sheet 2 and top sheet 3 had a length and width of 10.16 cm. Half of the volume of pouch 1 was filled with the stable Newtonian syrup. A rigid tube was inserted 2.54 cm into pouch 1 and the interface between pouch 1 and the rigid tube was sealed. Via the rigid tube, pouch 1 was subject to a vacuum of 84.66 kilo-Pascals. After sixty seconds of vacuum, only 0.70% of the original mass of the stable Newtonian syrup remained in pouch 1. The same test was performed with a pouch without microstructure. After sixty seconds of vacuum, 37.97% of the original mass of the stable Newtonian syrup remained in the pouch.
It should thus be appreciated that disclosed embodiments of pouch 1 enable at least 95, 96, 97, 98, and 99% mass extraction of a stable Newtonian syrup having a resting viscosity ranging from 20 centipoise to 65 centipoise at 21 degrees Celsius when subject to a vacuum pressure of at least 84 kilo-Pascals for sixty seconds.
For improved structural integrity and fluid extraction performance, bottom sheet 3 may be manufactured via a hot re-flow molding process instead of an embossing process. The process may be a cured fluid process, where curing happens via heat, solvent loss, light, or other chemical reactions.
More specifically, and with reference to
With reference to
Recessed area 102 need not cover the entire surface area of mold 100. As stated above, pouch 1 may be formed from a folded unity sheet. When such a sheet is desired, less than 50% of the surface area of mold 100 may be a recessed area 102 and the remaining surface area of mold 100 may be simply flat (e.g., identical to bottom wall 103).
Because bottom sheet 3 is formed via a molding process instead of via an embossing process (e.g., stretch embossing), bottom sheet 3, including microstructure 11, is integral. As a result, the non-microstructured portion of bottom sheet 3 (i.e., inner surface 21) is less likely to flex or deform with respect to microstructure 11, thus enabling bottom sheet 3 to resist wrinkling. If bottom sheet 3 were formed via embossing, bottom sheet 3 could include indentations or recesses along outer surface 32 corresponding to microstructure 11. Due to these indentations or recesses, the structural integrity of bottom sheet 3 would be impaired and bottom sheet 3 would more readily wrinkle.
Embossing, however, may be necessary in some cases and thus presents a less-preferred, but still advantageous embodiment of manufacturing pouch 1. During the embossing process, two rollers are used. The first roller is smooth and cylindrical. The second roller is cylindrical, but defines recesses 107 corresponding to microstructure (similar to mold 100 of
As an alternative to the above processes, an additive manufacturing system such as a 3D printer may be applied. A smooth and flat sheet may be placed before the 3D printer, which may then apply or deposit heated and at least semi-liquid material onto the smooth and flat sheet. Upon curing, the smooth and flat sheet is microstructured. Some 3D printers include curing features (e.g., UV lights or hot air blows) to accelerate curing.
With reference to
With reference to
Microstructure 1901 are arrayed as shown in
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
Advantageously, neither paths 2502 nor field 2503 are recessed into inner surface 31. Put differently, paths 2502 and field 2503 are non-microstructured portions of inner surface 31 that exclude a portion of at least one microfeature of the inner microstructure as shown in
Advantageously, neither paths 2502 nor field 2503 are recessed into inner surface 31. Put differently, paths 2502 and field 2503 are non-microstructured portions of inner surface 31. Paths 2502 are straight and may radially extend at equal intervals from field 2503.
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
As shown in
As shown in
For example, outer area 3601 of bottom sheet 3 may be microstructured (with any of the above-discussed microstructure) while inner area 3602 is non-microstructured. At the same time, outer area 3603 of top sheet 2 may be non-microstructured, while inner area 3604 is microstructured (with any of the above-discussed microstructure). The outer area 3601 and inner area 3604 may have different microstructure shapes (e.g., any of the above discussed microstructure shapes), as well as densities (e.g., any of the above discussed microstructure dimensions, spacing, etc.) This arrangement of microstructured areas is only one example, and it should be appreciated that the opposite may be present instead (where only inner area 3602 of bottom sheet 3 is microstructured and only outer area 3603 of top sheet 2 is microstructured).
As a similar example, only one of outer area 3601 and inner area 3602 of bottom sheet 3 includes microstructure 11, and only one of outer area 3603 and inner area 3604 of top sheet 2 includes microstructure, bottom sheet 3 and top sheet 2 being arranged and/or configured to complement each other (as previously discussed, to prevent overlap between microstructure 11 of bottom sheet 3 with microstructure 11 of top sheet 2).
Although the above examples show top and bottom sheets 2, 3 only being segmented into two different areas (an inner or outer microstructured area and an outer or inner nonmicrostructured area), top and bottom sheets 2, 3 may be segmented into any number of different areas (e.g., 3, 4, 5 different areas).
For example, with reference to
A flexible container (e.g., a pouch) for holding fluid is thus disclosed. The flexible container may comprise, consistent essentially of, or consist of: (a) a first sheet defining a first inner body and a first outer surface, the first inner body defining a first inner surface and inner microstructure extending from the first inner surface, the first inner body defining an aerial microstructure surface area density (AMSAD) between 5% and 15%, the AMSAD being defined as a total surface area of the microstructure, when viewed from a top plan perspective, divided by a total surface area of the inner body, when viewed from a top plan perspective; (b) a second sheet defining a second inner surface and a second outer surface, the second sheet being joined with the first sheet such that the first inner body and the second inner surface at least partially define an air-tight fluid chamber therebetween, the second sheet lacking microstructure extending from the second inner surface. The first inner surface, the first outer surface, the second inner surface, and the second outer surface are smooth and non-recessed.
A method of manufacturing a fluid pouch (i.e., a flexible container) is thus disclosed, the method comprising: (a) producing a first polymeric sheet comprising a first inner body and a flat and smooth first outer surface, the first inner body comprising a flat and smooth first inner surface and semi-spherical microstructure, (b) heating a perimeter of the first polymeric sheet to join the perimeter of the first polymeric sheet with a second polymeric sheet, the second polymeric sheet comprising a flat and smooth second inner surface and a flat and smooth second outer surface.
The step of producing the first polymeric sheet may comprise: (i) placing a mass of polymeric material into a mold, the mold defining a plurality of semi-spherical recesses arranged in an array; (ii) heating the mass of polymeric material, in the mold, at least until the mass of polymeric material flows into the semi-spherical recesses; (iii) cooling the mass polymeric material and removing the cooled mass of polymeric material from the mold. During the step of heating the perimeter of the first polymeric sheet, the semi-spherical microstructure of the first polymeric sheet may face the second inner surface of the second polymeric sheet. The second polymeric sheet may be non-microstructured. The mold may not include side-walls and thus the cooled polymeric sheet may be trimmed to the desired shape.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/319,563 (filed on Apr. 8, 2016), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2778173 | Taunton et al. | Jan 1957 | A |
4518643 | Francis | May 1985 | A |
4756422 | Kristen | Jul 1988 | A |
5044642 | Vogt et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5182069 | Wick et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5728086 | Niedospial, Jr. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738671 | Niedospial, Jr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5857275 | Deal | Jan 1999 | A |
6331334 | Trepte et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6420622 | Johnston et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431695 | Johnston et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6534166 | Pip et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540949 | Pip et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6741523 | Bommarito et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6800234 | Ferguson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6803090 | Castiglione et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6872438 | Allgeuer et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6946182 | Allgeuer et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6984278 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7137803 | Chou | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7185453 | Spear et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7357276 | Savage | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7534039 | Wu | May 2009 | B2 |
7608160 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7703179 | Ferguson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8153226 | Curro et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8318284 | Curro et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8440286 | Curro et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8448530 | Leuenberger et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8460568 | David et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8486319 | Victor et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8590193 | Licha | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8720047 | Hulseman et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8784713 | Victor et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8814954 | Hulseman et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8900651 | McClain et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8926782 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9119450 | Lee et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9120670 | Hulseman et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9238309 | King et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9303322 | Victor et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9517122 | Firstenberg et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9526640 | Bertolino et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20010007682 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020114920 | Scholz et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030006535 | Hennessey | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040050948 | Bartels | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050003146 | Spath | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050189314 | Carbone | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060005362 | Arzt et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060121248 | Lorenz et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060214380 | Dietle et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070025648 | Micnerski | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070241515 | Sato et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080199110 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090065141 | Kerber | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082856 | Flanagan | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090121383 | Jagota et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090146336 | Masi | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090184175 | Blankenstein et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090233041 | Rasmussen | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100096408 | Schiewe et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100129608 | Low et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100308497 | David | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100320111 | Maier | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110266724 | Hulseman et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282284 | Kriesel et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110311764 | Hulseman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120009387 | Wang et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120052241 | King et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120126458 | King et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136304 | Wyss | May 2012 | A1 |
20130101791 | Hitschmann et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130216712 | Merz | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140147629 | Tanaka et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140200679 | Bluecher et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140270599 | Farhat et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276494 | Cisko et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140318657 | Bixler et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140343687 | Jennissen | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150122846 | Stanley et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150140309 | Pricone | May 2015 | A1 |
20150175329 | Wilke et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150209846 | Aizanberg et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150209999 | Stone | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150298378 | Hulseman et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150298379 | Hulseman et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150307773 | Hulseman et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150327645 | Lee et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150328815 | Hulseman et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150368838 | Hulseman et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160052177 | Chauvin et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20170014111 | Hulseman et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170095019 | Milbocker et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102008048298 | May 2010 | DE |
932136 | Jul 1999 | EP |
2390324 | May 2010 | RU |
2014152477 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014154659 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2015057053 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015069857 | May 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Apr. 13, 2017 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/016579 (8 pages). |
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Aug. 7, 2017 for PCT Application No. PCT/US17/26435 (12 pages). |
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Aug. 28, 2017 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/0390085 (11 pages). |
3M, 3M Griping Material, Brochure, 2011 pp. 1-8, 3M, USA. |
Gravish et al., Frictional and Elastic Energy in Gecko Adhesive Detachment, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007, pp. 1-10, FirstCite e-publishing. |
Barquins, Sliding Friction of Rubber and Schallamach Waves—A Review, Materials Science and Engineering, 1985, 45-63, vol. 73. |
Bico et al. Rough Wetting, IOP Science, Journal article, Jul. 15, 2001, pp. 214-220, vol. 55, Europhysics Letters. |
Autumn et al., Evidence for Van Der Waals Adhesion in Gecko Setae, PNAS, Sep. 17, 2002, 12252-12256, vol. 99, USA. |
Metin Sitti et al., Syntehtic Gecko Foot-Hair Micro/Nano-Structures As Dry Adhesives, J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 1055-1073 (2003). |
Majidi et al., Attachment of Fiber Array Adhesive Through Side Contact, Journal of Applied Physics, 2005, pp. 103521-103521-5, vol. 98, California. |
Majidi et al., High Friction from A Stiff Polymer Using Microfiber Arrays, Physical Review Letters Aug. 18, 2006, pp. 076103-076103-4 vol. 97, USA. |
Kustandi et al., Fabrication of a Gecko-like Hierarchical Fibril Array Using a Bonded Porous Alumina Template, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Sep. 5, 2007, pp. N75- N81, vol. 1 IOP Publishing. |
Lee et al., Directional Adhesion of Gecko-Inspired Angled Microfiber Arrays, Applied Physics Letters, Nov. 13, 2008, pp. 191910-1-191910-3, vol. 93, American Institute of Physics, USA. |
Autumn, Gecko Adhesion: Structure, Function, and Applications, MRS Bulletin, Jun. 2007, pp. 473-478, vol. 32. |
Murphy et al., Gecko-Inspired Directional and Controllable Adhesion, Small, 2009, pp. 170-175, No. 5, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. |
Autumn et al., Gecko Adhesion: Evolutionary Nanotechnology, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, Jan. 11, 2008, pp. 1575-1590, vol. The Royal Society. |
Mahdavi et al., A Biodegradable and Biocompatible Gecko-Inspired Tissue Adhesive, PNAS, Feb. 19, 2008, pp. 2307-2312, vol. 105 No. 7. |
Forsberg et al., Contact Line Pinning on Microstructured Surfaces for Liquids in the Wnezel State, Langmuir Article, 2010, pp. 860-865, 26(2), American Chemical Society. |
Ben-David et al., The Dynamics of the Onset of Frictional Slip, Science Mag., Oct. 8, 2010, pp. 1-7, vol. 330, AAAS. |
Ben-David et al., The Dynamics of the Onset of Frictional Slip, Science Mag., Oct. 8, 2010, pp. 210-214, vol. 330, AAAS. |
Zappwei et al., Looking At How Things Slip, Science Mag., Oct. 8, 2010, pp. 184-185, vol. 330, AAAS. |
Y.M Park et al. Artificial Petal Surface Based on Hierarchical Micro- and Nanostructures, Thin Solid Films, Jul. 18, 2011, pp. 362-367, vol. 520, Elsevier B.V. South Korea. |
Labonte et al., Surface Contact and Design of Fibrillar ‘Friction Pad’ in stick insects (Carausius morosus): Mechanisms for large Friction Coefficients and Negligible Adhesion, J. R. Soc. Interface, Jan. 27, 2014, pp. 1-13, vol. 11. |
Tsipenyuk et al., Use of Biomimetic Hexagonal Surface Texture in Friction Against Lubricated Skin, J. R. Soc. Interface, Feb. 18, 2014, pp. 1-6, vol. 11. |
Tian et al., Adhesion And Friction In Gecko Toe Attachment And Detachment, PNAS, Dec. 19, 2006, pp. 19320-1932, vol. 103 No. 51. |
Barquins, Friction and Wear of Rubber-Like Materials, 1993, pp. 1-11, Elsevier Sequoia, France. |
Ebert et al., Wear-Resistant Rose Petal Effect Surfaces with Superhydrophobicity and High Droplet Adhesion Using Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Nanoparticles, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Jul. 4, 2012, pp. 182-188, USA. |
Chen et al., Bio-Mimetic Mechanisms of Natural Hierarchical Materials: A Review, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, Nov. 17, 2012, pp. 3-33, vol. 19, Elsevier Ltd. |
Liu et al., Bio-Inspired Superoleophobic and Smart Materials: Design, Fabrication, and Application, Progress in Materials Science, Nov. 15, 2012, pp. 503-564, vol. 58, Elsevier Ltd. |
Lee et al., Directional Adhesion of Gecko-Inspired Angled Microfiber Arrays. Applied Physics letters, Nov. 13, 2008, pp. 191910-1-191910-3, vol. 93, American Institute of Physics. |
Schubert et al., Towards Friction and Adhesion From High Modulus Microfiber Arrays, J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., Aug. 8, 2007, pp. 1297-1315, vol. 21 No. 12-13. VSP. |
Cannon et al., Extrusion of Low Friction and Low Tack Microstructured Surfaces on Silicone Rubber, Oct. 9-11, 2012, pp. 1-10. |
Autumn et al., Effective Elasstic Modulus of Isolated Gecko Setal Arrays, The Journal of Experimental Biology, Jun. 5, 2006 pp. 3558-3568, vol. 209, The Company of Biologists. |
Autumn et al., Frictional Adhesion: A New Angle on Gecko Attachment, The Journal of Experimental Biology, Aug. 11, 2006, pp. 3569-3579, vol. 209, The Company of Biologists. |
Zhao et al., Adhesion and Friction Force Coupling of Gecko Setal Arrays: Implications for Structured Adhesive Surfaces, Langmuir, 2008, pp. 1517-1524, vol. 24, The American Chemical Society. |
Liu et al., Bio-Inspired Design of Multiscale Structures for Funtion Integration, Nano Today, Mar. 5, 2011, pp. 155-175, vol. 6, Elsevier Ltd. |
Autumn et al., Adhesive Force of A Single Gecko Foot-hair, Nature, Jun. 8, 2000, pp. 681-685, vol. 405, Macmillan Magazines Ltd. |
Machalek, Porcupine Quills, Gecko Feet and Spider Webs Inspire Medical Materials, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Mar. 6, 2013, pp. 1-2. |
Schallamach, How Does Rubber Slide?, Wear, Dec. 12, 1970, pp. 301-312, vol. 17, Elsevier Sequoia. |
Qu et al., Carbon Nanotube Arryas with Strong Shear Binding-On and Easy Normal Lifting-Off, Science Mag., Oct. 10, 2008, pp. 238-242, vol. 322, AAAS. |
Liu et al., A New Generation High-Drag Proppant: Prototype Development, Laboratory Testing, and Hydraulic Fracturing Modeling, SPE International, Feb. 2015, pp. 1-5, Society of Petroleum Engineers. |
Pugno, Spiderman Gloves, Nano Today, Oct. 2008, pp. 35-41, vol. 3, Elsevier Ltd. |
Ramesh et al., Friction Characteristics of Microtextured Surfaces Under Mixed and Hydrodynamic Lubrication, Tribology International, Aug. 7, 2012, pp. 170-176, vol. 57, Elsevier Ltd. |
Villacorta et al., Viscoelastic Computational Modeling of Extruded Micro-Textured Polymeric Films, Procedia Materials Science, 2014, pp. 1460-1465, vol. 5, Elsevier Ltd. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/291,833. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/319,563. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/355,081. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/372,896. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170291746 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62319563 | Apr 2016 | US |