The present invention relates generally to fluid pressure sensing chambers and more specifically to fluid pressure sensing chambers used in ophthalmic surgical equipment.
When age or disease causes the lens to become less transparent, vision deteriorates because of the diminished light which can be transmitted to the retina. This deficiency in the lens of the eye is medically known as a cataract. An accepted treatment for this condition is surgical removal of the lens and replacement of the lens function by an artificial intraocular lens (IOL).
In the United States, the majority of cataractous lenses are removed by a surgical technique called phacoemulsification. During this procedure, a thin phacoemulsification cutting tip is inserted into the diseased lens and vibrated ultrasonically. The vibrating cutting tip liquifies or emulsifies the lens so that the lens may be aspirated out of the eye. The diseased lens, once removed, is replaced by an artificial lens.
A typical ultrasonic surgical device suitable for ophthalmic procedures consists of an ultrasonically driven handpiece, an attached cutting tip, and irrigating sleeve and an electronic control console. The handpiece assembly is attached to the control console by an electric cable and flexible tubings. Through the electric cable, the console varies the power level transmitted by the handpiece to the attached cutting tip and the flexible tubings supply irrigation fluid to and draws aspiration fluid from the eye through the handpiece assembly.
The operative part of the handpiece is a centrally located, hollow resonating bar or horn directly attached to a set of piezoelectric crystals. The crystals supply the required ultrasonic vibration needed to drive both the horn and the attached cutting tip during phacoemulsification and are controlled by the console. The crystal/horn assembly is suspended within the hollow body or shell of the handpiece by flexible mountings. The handpiece body terminates in a reduced diameter portion or nosecone at the body's distal end. The nosecone is externally threaded to accept the irrigation sleeve. Likewise, the horn bore is internally threaded at its distal end to receive the external threads of the cutting tip. The irrigation sleeve also has an internally threaded bore that is screwed onto the external threads of the nosecone. The cutting tip is adjusted so that the tip projects only a predetermined amount past the open end of the irrigating sleeve.
In use, the ends of the cutting tip and irrigating sleeve are inserted into a small incision of predetermined width in the cornea, sclera, or other location. The cutting tip is ultrasonically vibrated along its longitudinal axis within the irrigating sleeve by the crystal-driven ultrasonic horn, thereby emulsifying the selected tissue in situ. The hollow bore of the cutting tip communicates with the bore in the horn that in turn communicates with the aspiration line from the handpiece to the console. A reduced pressure or vacuum source, usually a peristaltic pump, in the console draws or aspirates the emulsified tissue from the eye through the open end of the cutting tip, the cutting tip and horn bores and the aspiration line and into a collection device. The aspiration of emulsified tissue is aided by a saline flushing solution or irrigant that is injected into the surgical site through the small annular gap between the inside surface of the irrigating sleeve and the cutting tip.
Prior art devices have used sensors that detect irrigation pressure or aspiration vacuum. Based on the information from these sensors, the surgical console can be programmed to respond in order to make the surgical procedure more efficient and safer. In order to reduce the risk of contamination by the aspirated fluid, recent surgical systems use closed pressure sensors, in which the fluid does not come into contact with the load cell or other device used to sense the fluid pressure. One such pressure sensor is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 5,392,653 (Zanger, et al.). Overall performance of such closed pressure sensors, however; depend in large part on purging all of the air from the system. Air is much more compressible than the irrigating solution used in surgery, and air pockets or bubbles add compliance to the system. Compliance results in undesirable pressure variations and fluctuations. Common methods of purging air from sealed liquid systems (or “priming” the system) include avoiding sharp edges and abrupt shape changes within the system as well as filling the system with liquid from the bottom or low point of the system. This allows the air to escape out of the top of the system as the systems fills with liquid from below. The inventors of the present invention have discovered that the initial priming of a pressure sensor chambers found within closed surgical fluidic systems is relatively easy, but if bubbles of air are allowed to enter the chamber (for example, if the surgical handpiece is changed mid-procedure), these air bubbles are extremely difficult to purge from the system. This difficulty is the result of the surface tension of the air bubble (as opposed to the unencapsulated air generally involved in the initial priming of the system) causing the bubble to be relatively robust and not easily broken and drawn out of the pressure sensing chamber once introduced. In addition, the liquid “film” surrounding the air bubble is tacky, causing the bubble to stick or adhere to surfaces within the system and resist further movement, even with very high flow rates. One reference, U.S. Pat. No. 6,059,765 (Cole, et al.) has suggested that certain chamber shapes and outlet locations may assist in the removal of air from surgical systems. The inventors have found that the chamber shapes and designs discussed in this reference are insufficient to assure that air bubbles can be purged from the system.
Accordingly, a need continues to exist for a pressure sensing chamber that prevents air from entering the chamber and being trapped within the chamber.
The present invention improves upon prior art peristaltic pumps by providing a pressure sensing chamber having a tubing extension with a reduced diameter portion extending through the chamber. The tubing contains a plurality of ports so as to allow the purging of air from the chamber, but the ports are sized so that bubbles entering the tubing cannot easily flow into the chamber. The reduced diameter portion creates a pressure differential between the holes. This differential pressure creates flow through the chamber under high liquid flow and turbulent liquid flow events.
One objective of the present invention is to provide a cassette a pressure sensing chamber that is easy to prime.
Another objective of the present invention is to provide a pressure sensing chamber that does not permit air bubbles from becoming trapped in the chamber.
Yet another objective of the present invention is to provide a pressure sensing chamber having a tubing extending through the chamber.
These and other advantages and objectives of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description, drawings and claims that follow.
As best seen in
As best seen in
As best seen in
This description is given for purposes of illustration and explanation. It will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art that modifications may be made to the invention as herein described without departing from its scope or spirit.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3324855 | Heimlich | Jun 1967 | A |
4140118 | Jassawalla | Feb 1979 | A |
4187057 | Xanthopoulos | Feb 1980 | A |
4479761 | Bilstad et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4493706 | Borsanyi et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4530647 | Uno | Jul 1985 | A |
4537561 | Xanthopoulos | Aug 1985 | A |
4680445 | Ogawa | Jul 1987 | A |
4713051 | Steppe et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4758238 | Sundblom et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4768547 | Danby et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4795440 | Young et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4798090 | Heath et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4798580 | DeMeo et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4838865 | Flank et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4861242 | Finsterwald | Aug 1989 | A |
4921477 | Davis | May 1990 | A |
4923375 | Ejlersen | May 1990 | A |
4927411 | Pastrone et al. | May 1990 | A |
4935005 | Haines | Jun 1990 | A |
4963131 | Wortrich | Oct 1990 | A |
5041096 | Beuchat et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5056992 | Simons et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5106366 | Steppe | Apr 1992 | A |
5195960 | Hossain et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5207647 | Phelps | May 1993 | A |
5267956 | Beuchat | Dec 1993 | A |
5302093 | Owens et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5364342 | Beuchat et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5392653 | Zanger et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5403277 | Dodge et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5429485 | Dodge | Jul 1995 | A |
5429602 | Hauser | Jul 1995 | A |
5460490 | Carr et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5470312 | Zanger et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5499969 | Beuchat et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5518378 | Neftel et al. | May 1996 | A |
5586438 | Fahy | Dec 1996 | A |
5588815 | Zaleski, II | Dec 1996 | A |
5634907 | Rani et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5709539 | Hammer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5746708 | Giesler et al. | May 1998 | A |
5746719 | Farra et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759017 | Patton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5810204 | Devlin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5897524 | Wortrich et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906598 | Giesler et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910110 | Bastable | Jun 1999 | A |
5927956 | Lim et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5996634 | Dennehey et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012999 | Patterson | Jan 2000 | A |
6059544 | Jung et al. | May 2000 | A |
6059765 | Cole et al. | May 2000 | A |
6129699 | Haight et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6235009 | Skow | May 2001 | B1 |
6261283 | Morgan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272930 | Crozafon et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293926 | Sorensen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6364857 | Gray et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6494694 | Lawless et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6572349 | Sorensen et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592737 | Robertson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6811386 | Hedington et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827709 | Fujii | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6955073 | Morgan et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962488 | Davis et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7393189 | Davis et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
8202243 | Morgan | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20030190244 | Davis et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050186098 | Davis et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070098578 | Morgan | May 2007 | A1 |
20080200878 | Davis et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080271741 | Graham et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0208955 | Jan 1987 | EP |
1213033 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1779878 | May 2007 | EP |
2 466 641 | Apr 1981 | FR |
07-505542 | Jan 1993 | JP |
09-178535 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2000-510239 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001-165054 | Jun 2001 | JP |
WO 9315777 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO 9324082 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 9324817 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 9923463 | May 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for EP 06122959.7, Publication No. EP1779878, 2 pages. |
European Search Report for EP 06122960.5, Publication No. EP1779879, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070095143 A1 | May 2007 | US |