The present application relates to a fluid separation system, and more particularly to a separation membrane therefor.
Conventional Reverse Osmosis fluid separation systems have multiple layers of membranes, feed channel spacers, and permeate collection materials interleafed to provide concentrate and permeate flow passages. The feed channel spacers are typically separate screen type members that increase fluid flow turbulence. The feed channel spacers may be prone to sediment collection and fouling.
Various features will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the disclosed non-limiting embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:
An anti-telescoping plate 28A, 28B is attached to the permeate collection tube 24 to retain the plurality of separation membranes 22 therebetween and prevent telescoping of the plurality of separation membranes 22 in response to fluid flow. Each anti-telescoping plate 28A, 28B includes an annular flow path 30 defined between a permeate collection tube support 32 and a rim 34. The anti-telescoping plate 28A, 28B may be attached to a pressure vessel 36 at the rim 34 thereof to contain the plurality of separation membranes 22 therein. The fluid separation system 20 may be formed as a cylindrical module such that a multiple may be connected in series. Other cross-sectional shapes may alternatively be provided.
Reverse osmosis (RO) is a separation process that uses pressure to force a solution through a membrane that retains the solute on one side and allows the pure solvent to pass to the other side. More formally, the process of forcing a solvent from a region of high solute concentration through a membrane to a region of low solute concentration is achieved through application of a pressure in excess of the osmotic pressure. As used herein, the term “separation membrane” refers to any material used for reverse osmosis such as a dense barrier layer in a polymer matrix where most separation occurs. Although the separation membranes 22 disclosed herein allow only water to pass through this dense layer while preventing the passage of solutes such as salt ions, any material to which a reverse osmosis type process may be applied will also benefit herefrom.
The plurality of separation membranes 22 are arranged in pairs of separation membranes 22A, 22B to define a fluid separation element or “leaf” 23 which is closed on three sides. As used herein, the term “leaf” refers to a separation membrane arrangement which is in communication with a set of apertures 26 such that a solution through the separation membrane retains the solute on one side and allows the pure solvent to pass to the other side for communication into the set of apertures 26. The fourth or open side of each leaf 23 is located adjacent a respective set of apertures 26 in the permeate collection tube 24 to define a fluid flow path from between each pair of separation membranes 22A, 22B into the permeate collection tube 24 (
A pattern of features 40 (illustrated schematically) are formed on each, or on particular combinations of, the plurality of separation membranes 22. The features 40 may be of various sizes and shapes including, but not limited to, waves, arcs, lines, chevrons, and such like. As used herein, the term “feature” refers to any protrusion, bump, knob, jut, projection, protuberance, ridge, line, etc. that is formed on the separation membrane 22. The features 40 may be formed in one non-limiting embodiment by screen printing of an elastomeric material onto one or both sides of each or particular combinations of the plurality of separation membranes 22 to form the pattern. It should be understood that the pattern of features 40 may be otherwise provided such as through integral formation within the separation membranes 22. The elastomeric material may additionally be utilized to seal the three sides of the pair of separation membranes 22A, 22B. Although an elastomeric material is disclosed herein, it should be understood that various polymer and other materials may alternatively or additionally be utilized to form the features 40.
The pattern of features 40 are oriented and arranged, for example, to enhance turbulence, reduce back pressure and reduced sediment trapping such as bio-fouling or other solidified solute.
The pattern of features 40 may be tailored specifically to the different requirements for different sections of the plurality of separation membranes 22 such as for high flow, low pressure loss at an inlet adjacent the anti-telescoping plate 28A and a lower flow, higher pressure loss at an exit adjacent the anti-telescoping plate 28B.
The pattern of features 40 may also operate as a spacer between the plurality of separation membranes 22 such that the fluid flow is tailored specifically to the membrane requirements, including, but not limited to, flux, turbulence, disruption of the boundary layer, etc. It should be understood that various computerized fluid flow model systems may be utilized to determine the desired pattern of features 40.
A feed solution S supplied through the anti-telescoping plate 28A enters between the leafs 23. While the feed solution S flows over and around the leafs 23, permeate fluid F, for example water, permeates through the pairs of separation membranes 22A, 22B into each leaf 23 while concentrate C continues between the leafs 23.
The permeated fluid F flows between the pairs of separation membranes 22A, 22B within the leaf toward the permeate collection tube 24 where the permeate fluid F is collected therein through the set of apertures 26. Permeated flow F within the permeate collection tube 24 flows therein in a downstream direction. Concentrate C which does not permeate through the pairs of separation membranes 22A, 22B into each leaf 23 exits downstream through the annular exit of the anti-telescoping plate 28B.
The pattern of features 40 are applied directly to the plurality of separation membranes 22 in various combinations, for example, to eliminate separate feed channel spacer layers and permeate collection material layers while sediment trapping is minimized or eliminated. This allows flexibility in the design of the flow pattern relative to the fluid flow path.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The pattern of features 40A provide a lower hydraulic resistance to the flow (˜77% reduction in axial pressure gradient from 0.13 psi/inch to 0.03 psi/inch); minimize flow angle-of-attack minimizes hydraulic resistance and minimizes low velocity wake regions where biofouling occurs; and provides higher channel midplane velocities and thus higher fluid shearing to resist biofouling buildup and resist membrane clogging (
Referring to
The pattern of features 40B provide the highest channel midplane velocities and thus highest fluid shearing to resist bacterial biofouling buildup and resist membrane clogging; and lower hydraulic resistance to the flow (˜69% reduction in axial pressure gradient from 0.13 psi/inch to 0.04 psi/inch) (
The pattern of features 40B may be optimized in relationship to provide a tradeoff between axial pressure gradient and channel velocities. The wake regions therefrom can also be further reduced by overlapping the spacer columns by about half the tip length of each adjacent feature 40B. Minimizing low velocity wake regions, where biofouling may be likely is achieved through the column overlap of the feature 40B to reduce the wake regions. Notably, wake regions can be further improved by overlapping the spacer columns by half the tip length. A reduction in the wake regions cause the axial pressure drop to increase in order to pump the same flow rate through the channels. While spacer shape and flow angle-of-attack relative to the incoming flow are important to minimize both pressure drop and wake regions, at some point in optimization further improvements to the wake region to reduce biofouling result in a greater pressure drop. This point essentially provides the optimized relationship.
It should be understood that like reference numerals identify corresponding or similar elements throughout the several drawings. It should also be understood that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit herefrom.
Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present application.
The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Various non-limiting embodiments are disclosed herein, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that various modifications and variations in light of the above teachings will fall within the scope of the appended claims. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described. For that reason the appended claims should be studied to determine true scope and content.
The present disclosure claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/208,523, filed Feb. 25, 2009.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/067800 | 12/13/2009 | WO | 00 | 8/24/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/098803 | 9/2/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
188224 | Allen | Mar 1877 | A |
1029583 | Bennett | Jun 1912 | A |
4016082 | Riede et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4296951 | Zimmerly | Oct 1981 | A |
4301013 | Setti et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4517085 | Driscoll et al. | May 1985 | A |
4834881 | Sawada et al. | May 1989 | A |
4855058 | Holland et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5094749 | Seita et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5985146 | Knappe et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6224767 | Fujiwara et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6632357 | Barger et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6805730 | Herczeg | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6881336 | Johnson | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6902672 | Herron | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908547 | Cote et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6984321 | Heine | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7008465 | Graham et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7090784 | Asakawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097781 | Asakawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7270744 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7303675 | De La Cruz | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7306709 | Grebenyuk et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311831 | Bradford et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7318898 | Sabottke | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7338601 | Schott et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
8292492 | Ho et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20040011723 | Bradford et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20070095756 | Hardwicke et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1214114 | Nov 1986 | CA |
2010125418 | Jun 2010 | JP |
WO9633798 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO9706693 | Feb 1997 | WO |
0220142 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO02051529 | Jul 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 1, 2010 for PCT/US2009/067800. |
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-552018 dated Feb. 5, 2013. |
International Application No. PCT/US2009/67800 Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, (2012). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120018366 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61208523 | Feb 2009 | US |