This invention generally relates to fluidic lens systems and more particularly to electrostatically actuated fluidic lens.
The prior art contains a number of references to fluidic lens systems. A notable example is provided by those based on the electro-wetting effect (see, e.g. Bruno Berge, et al., “Lens with variable focus”, PCT Publication No. WO 99/18456). In that system, a lens-like volume of one refractive liquid is separated from its surroundings on at least one side by another immiscible refractive liquid. Although this yields a conveniently compact system, it is difficult to provide enough refractive index difference between the two liquids to provide adequate light-ray bending ability. A refractively superior system has also been demonstrated (see J. Chen et al., J. Micromech. Microeng. 14 (2004) 675-680) wherein only one lenticular body is provided, bounded on at least one side by an optically clear, compliant membrane. In that system, the refractive power of the lens is controlled by pumping in or out a controlled amount of fluid, thereby changing the curvature of the bounding membrane. Although improved, that system still suffers from the disadvantage that the pressurized fluid source is located remotely. This makes the form-factor of the whole system inconvenient.
Thus, there is a need in the art, for a fluidic lens that overcomes the above disadvantages.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Although the following detailed description contains many specific details for the purposes of illustration, anyone of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that many variations and alterations to the following details are within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments of the invention described below are set forth without any loss of generality to, and without imposing limitations upon, the claimed invention.
Alternative fluidic optical devices are described in commonly assigned U.S. provisional patent application 60/680,632, filed May 14, 2005, 60/683,072, filed May 21, 2005, 60/703,827, filed Jul. 29, 2005 and 60/723,381, filed Oct. 3, 2005, which are incorporated herein by reference. Such fluidic optical devices include a device skeleton having an aperture and a reservoir in fluid communication with the aperture. The aperture and reservoir are integral to the skeleton. A transparent fluid is enclosed within the aperture and reservoir. One or more optical surfaces at least partially bound the aperture. Distortion of the reservoir results in the displacement of at least a portion of the fluid between the reservoir and the aperture. In response to the fluid displacement at least one of the optical surfaces is displaced from an initial position to vary an optical property of the device. There are sufficient restoring forces in at least a portion of the distorted reservoir, displaced fluid, aperture and actuator to restore the displaced optical surface to its initial position upon release of a force applied to the reservoir.
The device may include an actuator adapted to apply a force to and cause a distortion in at least a portion of the reservoir. Major Goals of fluidic lens actuation include the following:
Utilize as much available space (e.g., 100 mm3) as possible, while achieving desired energy/power requirements.
There are many possible actuator solutions. Among these are shape memory alloy (SMA) actuators, Electroactive Polymer (EAP) actuators also known as Electroactive Polymer Artificial Muscle (EPAM) actuators, electrostatic actuators, piezoelectric actuators, stepper motor or other forms of motor actuators and electromagnetic (EM) actuators. Estimated energy and power requirements as a function of actuation frequency for these various actuators are shown in
A type of electrostatic actuator referred to herein as a Capacitive Fluidic Lens is a small dynamically adjustable optical lens. An example of a capacitive fluidic lens 200 according to an embodiment of the invention is depicted in
It is noted that there may be two or more insulated electrodes on the membrane. Multiple electrode segments allow for asymmetrical actuation of the lens and control over its shape. In addition, the membrane may include channels between the electrodes that facilitate fluid flow toward the central lens section.
As shown in
It is known in the art that electrostatic actuators tend to be bi-stable unless a zipper action is used; that is to say, when parallel plates are actuated against a linearly elastic restoring force, electrostatic actuation tends to be snap acting because the electrostatic force is proportional to the reciprocal of the square of the gap distance. However, if the geometry of the actuator provides a closing action that starts at one end and gradually closes zippers the gap closed from one end to the other, a stable, proportional actuation occurs. The Capacitive Fluidic Lens utilizes this zipper action by allowing the conductive surfaces to touch at the outer edge of the system first. Then, as voltage is applied, the contacting surface line moves toward the center proportionally.
Such wedged or ‘zipper’ actuators typically use an air dielectric (instead of fluid as in the present example). In such a case, the conducting plate (or elastic membrane in the present case) provides a restoring force characterized, e.g., by a spring constant. The restoring force prevents the electrodes from snapping together abruptly. The viscosity of the fluid may provide a damping force.
By way of example, zipper actuation may be implemented where an electrode and a conductive membrane start out in a wedged configuration with the electrode and membrane furthest apart in the middle and closest together at a periphery. Alternatively, a smaller gap could also be located proximate to the center (i.e., the optical aperture) and the larger gap could be located closer to the outer edge of the membrane. In this latter case, flow channels may be provided in order to allow the fluid to flow from the outer edge to the central optical aperture.
As a voltage is applied between the electrode and membrane they are drawn into closer contact with each other with the edge of the contacting regions being drawn radially inward as greater and greater voltage is applied. Mechanical forces and viscoelastic forces between the membrane and a fluid prevent the membrane from “snapping” against the electrode as soon as a voltage is applied.
A high index of refraction of the contained fluid adds to the optical power of the lens. Therefore, a higher power lens can be created in smaller package with a careful choice of optical fluid. Typical good fluids are Fomblin and silicone (PDMS) oils.
Although adding to the overall optical power, high refractive index materials can cause large Fresnel reflections which add to the loss of the optical system. Some of these Fresnel reflection losses are able to be compensated by broad-band anti-reflection coatings. Furthermore, it is possible to make the membrane itself act as the anti-reflection coating.
The choice of elastomeric material is paramount to the design of the Capacitive Fluidic Lens. It requires good optical clarity, high elastic strain ability with little or no creep, and ease of manufacturing. PDMS is a good candidate as well as some clear thermo-plastic elastomers, which can be injection molded. For the conductive surfaces, a filler material can be added to the bulk media to provide electrical conductivity. See Electrical Contacts and Capacitive Surfaces for more details and alternatives.
By way of example, and without limitation, the elastomeric material may be made of a silicone-based polymer such as poly(dimethylsiloxane) also known as PDMS or a polyester material such as PET or Mylar™. It is noted that if the fluid and membrane may have sufficiently similar refractive indices, or include a suitable optical coating, scattering of light at their interface can be significantly reduced. Further, it may be desirable to select a membrane having an index of refraction that serves to substantially impedance match the refractive indices of the fluid and the external environment, thereby reducing optical scattering in the proximity of the optical surfaces of the capacitive lens.
The Electrical Contacts and the Capacitive Surfaces are made by applying a metallized coating to the flexible membranes, or by adding conductive filler material to the bulk material. Externally, electrical connections are then made by physical contact to exposes pads, or by soldering leads to the pads. The Capacitive Surfaces require dielectric insulation, which can be formed by a number of materials and coating methods. One good choice is Teflon, which can be applied by either dipping, spraying.
With three or more isolated capacitive regions, image stabilization algorithms can be applied to tip the axis of the lens and dynamically stabilize the image. Static lenses and other optical elements, placed in contact with or spaced apart from the fluidic lens (or lenses in a zoom configuration), may be desirable in order to add or subtract a static amount of diopters from the range of diopters of the fluid lens. When the f/# (focal length/diameter) of the fluid lens goes below 10, spherical aberration may become significant. In this case, a static aspheric optical element, in optical communication with the fluidic lens, may be desirable in order to correct for such spherical aberration.
Most zoom lenses follow a design having a number of individual lenses that may be either fixed, or slide axially along the body of the lens. As the magnification of a zoom lens changes, it is necessary to compensate for any movement of the focal plane to keep the focused image sharp. This compensation may be done by mechanical means (moving the complete lens assembly as the magnification of the lens changes), or optically (arranging the position focal plane to vary as little as possible as the lens is zoomed). With the capacitive fluidic lenses of embodiments of the present invention, such a zoom lens system can be implemented without any of the lenses having to translate.
By way of example, two fluidic lenses may be combined with a fixed static optical element to form a compact lens system, e.g. a zoom lens system as shown in
By way of example, the static optical element may be made of a solid material that has an index of refraction greater than that of a surrounding medium such as air (n>1). Such a spacer optic would serve to lengthen the effective optical path length between the optical elements located on either side of it. The spacer optic may also have optical surfaces patterned into it in order to modify static optical properties to the system (for example, the spacer optic may have a concave lens surface in order to add negative focal power to the system, or it can have diffraction gratings in order to filter portions of the light going through it; it can have optical coatings (antireflection, etc). In addition, the spacer optic may also provide structural support to the system, and it can be part of the overall integration and packaging.
The system may focus an image onto an image detector such as a charge coupled device (CCD), CMOS image sensor, photographic film, holographic film or other optical image detector. Since the lenses don't have to move and the focal length can be computer controlled a simple, versatile and inexpensive zoom lens can be implemented using fluidic lenses as described herein.
Those of skill in the art will recognize that other multiple lens systems can be implemented using capacitive fluidic lenses of the type described herein. Such systems may include, but are not limited to cameras, telescopes, microscopes, rifle scopes and endoscopes. As such, embodiments of the invention are not limited to zoom lens applications.
With variable a spacer optic between the focal length lenses in a zoom system it is possible to effectively reduce the size of the system compared to a conventional telescoping zoom system, where, the lenses have to be free to move and the space between them is variable. Conventional zoom lenses are described e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 696,788, which is incorporated herein by reference. In the above embodiment, the space between the lenses may be fixed.
Conventional variable focus optical systems typically utilize one or more static (e.g., fixed focal length) lenses or groups of lenses that change their position in order to effect parameters including focus (such as an autofocus lens system), field of view (or zoom), tilt (for image stabilization). According to embodiments of the present invention, conventional fixed focal length moving lenses may be replaced with variable-focal-length lenses that are fixed in their position but are able to change parameters such as focal length and orientation of their optical axes in order to change the same parameters listed above. With electrostatic fluidic lenses of the types described herein, a compact multi-lens optical (e.g., zoom, autofocus, image stabilization, etc) image capture system may be fabricated with an overall length that is less than for a comparable system the uses fixed focal length lenses that translate along an optical axis. Consequently, the optical path length and/or physical size of the system may be made more compact that in prior art systems. For example, the overall length of such a system can be 10 mm and it can provide >3× zoom and autofocus.
The above advantages and others may be obtained using a static optical element between any variable focus lenses (i.e., electrowetting, fluidic, liquid crystal, electro-optic, etc.)
Certain calculations and simulations have been made regarding the electrical and optical performance of capacitive fluidic lenses of the types described herein. For simulation simplicity the footprint of the capacitor is assumed circular, making the problem fully axi-symmetrical. Since the central electrode is taken as a plane of symmetry, the model only tackles the upper half. The construction of the actuator is further assumed to have the following characteristics and dimensions:
Electrodes: The electrodes are assumed to be rigidly translatable in the z direction.
Cylindrical boundary: Fluid tight joints are assumed to prevent leaks between electrodes and boundary, without introducing any mechanical hindrance to the motion (in reality, those joints might be flexures, with some small but finite restoring force)
Membrane: The membrane is assumed to be flexibly joined to the electrodes (or having an extension bonded to the underside of the electrodes).
Boundary conditions and other assumptions: Fluid elements are assumed to be in contact with electrodes have the same motion as the electrodes. The central electrode is assumed to be fixed. It is further assumed that fluid elements directly under the flexible lens membranes do not contribute to viscous pressure gradients
Variable definitions and numerical input parameters, which are illustrated in
The fluid flow on which the electro-statically actuated fluidic lens is based, can be described as follows:
The Reynolds number in the present case is estimated as follows:
Re=vr(rP−rL)/(μ/ρ) (1)
Stokes equation is the low Reynolds number limit of the Navier-Stokes equation
Equation of continuity is equivalent to conservation of mass for a homogeneous, incompressible fluid
Electrostatic force between the electrodes of a capacitor (neglecting fringing fields):
A radial velocity profile is shown in
Consider the fluid volume swept by the electrode as it moves over a distance dz within the radial range from rP to r. Since the fluid is incompressible, that entire volume will penetrate inwardly and be distributed over an imaginary cylindrical wall of circumference 2πr and height zm. The resulting integrated radial flow is
Note that with a negative (downward) moving top electrode, the flow is negative (i.e. moving radially inward).
From the theory of Poiseuille flows in narrow channels it is known that viscous forces cause the velocity profile to assume a parabolic shape. The no slip assumption further requires the radial velocity to vanish at the electrodes. In conformity to those expectations, we propose a radial flow density of the form:
Q(r,z)=A(r)·z(zm−z) (6)
Integrating over the imaginary cylindrical wall of area 2πrzm and requiring consistency with Equation 5 results in:
The complete solution will require knowledge of the z velocity component as well. We obtain that by integrating the continuity equation 3 with respect to z. That process is aided by recognizing that
is independent of r. The result is
Now that the velocity is known, the Laplacian in the Stokes equation 2 can be evaluated producing a function of only the radius. This, in turn, can be integrated to yield the radial pressure profile:
As expected, when r is in the range from rL to rP and the top electrode is pressed downward (negative velocity), the pressure increases radially outward from rL. The thickness zm of the channel features very prominently in the formula, as can be seen in
The load carried by the electrostatic actuator comes from viscous effects and from the elastic deformation of the lens membrane (inertial loading is ignored here because of the low frequencies involved). The load exerted by the fluid over the area of the electrode is evaluated by integrating Equation 9:
where x=rP/rL.
To overcome this load, the electrostatic actuator would have to produce an opposing force of at least equal magnitude.
The deflected lens membrane is restrained by peripheral contact with the rigid electrode. The forces involved are described in terms of a tension N, which is a force per unit of circumference length. The total load exerted by the membrane is obtained by integrating the vertical component of the tension over the lens circumference:
The radius of curvature R relates to the lens “sag” h (or the height of the spherical cap) by simple geometry:
The sag, in turn can be determined by equating the spherical cap volume
with the volume swept by the entire cylindrical surface πrP2(zm(0)−zm). That constraint becomes
h(h2+3rL2)=6rP2(zm(0)−zm) (14)
It is clear that the assumption implied by Equation 14 is that the lens is flat at the beginning of the stroke. Nevertheless, it would be equally easy to assume either a positive or negative curvature dome at the start of the stroke simply by adding a constant term the right side. Tension N is evaluated by relating it to the radial stress in the membrane:
Equations 15 and 16 are combined
followed by Equations 11 and 17:
Although the relationship between the membrane load and electrode height is not simple, the process of numerical evaluation is straightforward:
Zm Eq. 14 4 h Eq.13>R Eq.12 q18>Finembrane (19)
The overall load is then the result of combining Equations 19 and 10.
The above analysis permits quantitative and graphical estimation of the electrostatically actuated fluidic lens in terms of a certain response function, namely position and speed versus voltage and radius of curvature. The latter can be related to the lens refractive power P in diopters:
As was previously mentioned, viscous forces dominate the dynamics of narrow channels. The balance of forces:
Solving Equation 10 for dzm/dt, substituting in Equation 21 and neglecting membrane forces yields
This is now the classical exponential decay differential equation, with solution:
The behavior of this time constant is depicted in
The findings of previous sections as well as prior art in the microfluidics field suggest that there are ways to improve the overall system response. The so-called “zipper” approach, for instance focuses the electric field in a relatively narrow region, where the lens aspect ratio x is small (see equation 24). By chaining a sequence of such regions mechanically, the overall effect can be large, without having the multiplicity of regions negate the advantage of small aspect ratio in each. This is possible because of the highly nonlinear behavior of the aspect ratio function. Many important design implications may be gained from the above physics model & analysis. For example, a smaller lens is better in terms of faster response time, lower actuation voltage, etc. In addition, collapse of the initial gap brings the next electrode region into a close gap and small x condition. Also, a controlled compliance electrode may be used to couple annular regions. Furthermore, the dielectric gap vs. radius and electrode compliance may be designed for continuous performance. Segmented electrodes may be used for digital or hybrid operation as well as for tilt functionality. It is also possible to focus the electric field (e.g., with a smaller gap) in narrow region (small x).
Following the guidelines established from the modeling described above, a zipper action capacitive fluidic lens design may be as shown in
A portion of the membrane that lies radially outward of the aperture ring may be coated with a conductive coating, e.g., gold. The base may include an electrically isolated conductive coating that serves as an electrode. The sloping of the membrane allows for zipper action of the capacitive fluidic lens. The zipper action is illustrated in
As a greater voltage is applied a greater area of the membrane is pulled into contact with the base. This squeezes more fluid into the aperture ring causing the membrane covering the opening in the aperture ring to bulge.
Embodiments of the present invention include an amplification feature moves rigidly with electrode. An example of such a feature is shown in
Although it is possible to use zipper actuation with the Electrostatic Flow Amplifier (schematically pictured above) the amplification feature renders it unnecessary. The zipper is normally used to lower the voltage required by a relatively large stroke. It does that by employing a graduated electrode gap. The small end of the gap profile allows a small voltage to initiate the pulling together of the electrodes. Flexibility of at-least-one electrode allows a portion thereof to lie down (conform) to the other electrode while the remaining portion has not yet collapsed. Persistent application of the voltage eventually brings a maximal portion of the electrodes to a collapsed condition.
With the electrostatic amplification device, the stroke of the electrostatic actuator is hydraulically amplified to produce the lens motion. This means that fluid from a relatively large area is collected into the relatively small area under the lens membrane. A small stroke of a rigid plate capacitor can produce considerable doming of the lens. Where it not for the retarding effects of viscous flow, a small-gap rigid-electrode capacitor would provide adequate stroke at adequate voltage. Unfortunately, it is precisely at such small gap that viscous forces would provide great opposition to the electrostatic force. This opposition would require application of unreasonably large voltages or waiting a long time for the flow to trickle through the narrow gap.
The Electrostatic Flow Amplifier approach was conceived to overcome these limitations of the flat-plate electrostatic actuator, while retaining its snap-down suppression property. The device area is mostly rigid, except for the lens dome and the flexible edge seal. The viscous opposition to actuation is significantly reduced by limiting the small gap region to the relatively narrow electroded area. The voltage can be kept low because: (a) fluid path length through a thin gap channel is short (narrow electrode), and (b) the small gap is located in the outer regions of the device where fluid velocity is low (velocity increases radially inward for constant gap capacitors). This would be true even if the lens dome were to occupy the entire non-electroded area of the device. In that case, the volume of fluid transferred to the lens might be inadequate, owing to the relatively small electroded area. By adding the intermediate Amplification feature between the electrodes and the lens, a much larger area of fluid can be swept by the actuator stroke, thus significantly amplifying the lens motion. The increased gap in this amplification region, means that one can adjust the added viscous opposition to a conveniently low or negligible level, because the viscous forces are proportional to the inverse gap cubed. The presence of liquid in the electrode gap will still suppress the snap-down effect, providing analog controllability at a reasonable voltage.
An alternative construction of a fluidic lens 1400 is depicted in
In some embodiments it is desirable for the actuator to be decoupled from the fluid flow. In such cases an optimized lens referred to herein as a liquid pill lens may be used. The liquid pill lens is a low-cost, producible fluidic lens having front and back optical surfaces with refractive power and capable of being actuated by controlled deformation. The structure of the liquid pill is very simple. As shown in
Instead of a mechanical actuator, the liquid pill lens 1500 may be actuated using a zipper electrostatic actuator that is external to the pill.
The use of a liquid pill lens in conjunction with a zipper actuator avoids viscosity issues. The lens fluid that fills the cavity can be optimized for optical and environmental constraints. In addition, the Zipper design can borrow more heavily from existing art. Furthermore, segmented or multiple actuators possible for tilt control.
It is noted that this approach may be designed to solve an alignment problem typically encountered with this type of fluid lens (i.e., a fluid lens that is actuated by depressing an annular piston directly on the optical surface). Specifically, it is difficult to align the membrane and the top ring such that they are parallel with each other. Such misalignment leads to astigmatism and other aberrations in the fluid lens. This problem can generally be solved if the lens cell “floats” angularly within the outer ring—i.e., if the outside diameter (O.D.) of the lens cell is somewhat smaller than the inside diameter (I.D.) of the outer ring, thus allowing some angular freedom of movement of the lens cell within the outer ring. Additionally, the threads in the top ring can be sized, relative to the threads in the I.D. of the geared internal lead screw, such that the top ring is allowed some angular freedom of movement within the threads. Further, the bottom retainer can be rigidly fixed to the base plate. In this fashion, the lens cell is allowed angular freedom wherein it can orient itself in a position such that the lower membrane of the lens cell (i.e., the membrane of the lens cell that is proximal to the bottom retainer and distal to the top ring) is parallel to the piston of the bottom retainer. Similarly, the top ring is allowed angular freedom to align itself parallel to the top membrane of the lens cell (i.e., the membrane of the lens cell that is proximal to the top ring and distal to the bottom retainer). By allowing the lens cell and the top ring to float and find parallel orientations for the membranes and their respective actuating surfaces, aberrations in the fluid lens can be avoided.
Fabrication of the liquid pill can follow well-known industrial methods. Here is a possible sequence of steps:
As mentioned above, the shape of the liquid pills may be other than circular. This would create additional spacer area, which could be used for locating features such as registration pins and anti-rotation keys.
Capacitive fluidic lenses of the types described herein may be manufactured using standard techniques and equipment. Equipment may include PDMS mixing equipment, molds, an injection molding machine, ovens, an electron beam evaporation chamber, and possibly a clean room, lithography equipment and dielectric material processing equipment.
By way of example a conventional manufacturing plant such as an LCD manufacturer is likely to have suitable experience and equipment (e.g., PDMS experience, clean room facilities, etc.). The general lens manufacturing process may proceed as shown in
The Process Steps may proceed as follows:
1) A mixture of PDMS 10:1 Sylgard 184 may be poured into molds, as shown in
2) Conductors may be added to each membrane half, as shown in
3) Insulator may be added by applying an insulator mask to the molded PDMS and vapor depositing or otherwise forming insulator over the PDMS and mask. The insulator mask may subsequently be removed.
4) The two lens halves may then be bonded together, filled with oil and the fill holes may be plugged, which is shown in
5) The resulting electrostatic lens may then be tested for electrical and optical performance, which is shown in
A key step in the fabrication process of fluidic lenses according to embodiments of the present invention is the formation of a conductive, e.g., metalized membrane for the elastic capacitor section. It is desirable that such a metallization process be a low-cost process that produces strong adhesion of the metallization to the underlying elastomer. The metal used preferably is highly ductile and the coating highly conductive at strains greater than about 5%. Preferably the process should involve little or no lithography yet provide a pattern for pads, wires, terminations and the like.
Unfortunately, most metal-on-elastomer films tend to fracture at 2-3% strain. The rupture of such films occurs by localized plastic deformation in the form of local thinning and forming of shear bands. To overcome this problem, embodiments of the invention may use elastomer membranes that have been metallized using spontaneous wrinkling of gold film on PDMS Membranes. In this technique, stripes of gold (Au) films are made on PDMS with a built-in compressive stress to form surface waves. A Cr+ adhesion interlayer (e.g., about 5-nm thick) is deposited on the elastomer before deposition of the gold film to a thickness of about 100 nanometers. Gold is one of the most ductile metals and is also highly conductive. Gold may be deposited by electron beam evaporation at room temperature onto PDMS.
Conductivity for gold-on-elastomer films has been observed at strains up to 22%
Such gold-on-elastomer films are described, e.g., by S. Pèrichon, et. al., in “Stretchable gold conductors on elastomeric substrates,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 82, 15, p. 2404-2406 (Apr. 14, 2003), disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
According to alternative embodiments of the present invention, electrostatic lenses may be manufactured using a process known as multilayer soft lithography. In this process a soft polymer (e.g., PDMS or other elastomer) is cast on a mold containing a microfabricated relief or engraved pattern. The casting molds may be made of silicon wafers on which a photoresist pattern has been created using a conventional photolithography as in fabrication of integrated circuits. Lithography masks may be made of transparencies on which the pattern is printed using a commercial laser printer with 20,000 dpi resolution. Un-crosslinked liquid polymer is poured over the mold and cured (crosslinked). After crosslinking, the polymer is peeled off the mold. The surface of the polymer that was in contact with the mold is left with an imprint of the mold topography. Such topography typically defines channels and chambers that will form part of a microfluidic system. Several layers of elastomer, all with different patterns, may be stacked and bonded together forming microfluidic device.
Fabrication of an electrostatic lens using multilayer soft lithography may proceed as shown in
After the mold pieces 2012 and the second layer of mold release 2010 are separated, metal electrodes 2014 may be formed on the PDMS layers 2008, e.g., by evaporation through a shadow mask 2016 as shown in
After the two halves are bonded together, the molds may be removed as shown in
Embodiments of the present invention may use perfluorinated polyether (PFPE) inert fluids as the transparent fluid. PFPE fluids have several desirable properties including low vapor pressure, chemical inertness, high thermal stability, good lubricant properties, no flash or fire point, excellent compatibility with metals, plastics & elastomers, good aqueous and non-aqueous solvent resistance, high dielectric properties, low surface tension, good radiation stability, environmental acceptability and low cost. The table below lists some properties of PFPE fluids. Comparative graphs of refractive index versus optical wavelength for PFPE fluids and other refractive media are shown in
As can be seen from the graph in
Drop test performance for electrostatically actuated fluidic lenses has been modeled assuming a basic design that uses a PDMS membrane filed with a PFPE fluid. As can be seen from the following table such a design is theoretically capable of withstanding more than 3900 g's of acceleration.
In modeling the drop test performance only the weakest link in the system—the lens membrane—has been modeled. The lens membrane has the most compliance and lowest resonant frequency of any part in the system. The rest of the system is stiff and not as easily excited by vibration.
Embodiments of the present invention exhibit certain advantages over prior art fluidic lenses in terms of scalability. One prior art approach uses a microfluidic lens with a microfluidic pump. The pump actuator is not scalable. As can be seen from
An alternative electrostatic fluidic lens design utilizes a phenomenon known as electrowetting. In electrowetting lenses, the shape of the interface between two immiscible fluids is changed by applying an electric field. However, the choices for fluids for such lenses is limited. Furthermore, there tends to be a small difference in refractive for typical combinations of fluids used in electrowetting lenses. Consequently, electrowetting lenses require large fluid volume and high voltage. In addition, the fluid interface has limited stability at large lens size. Above a certain size, the fluidic interface becomes unstable and unusable as a variable lens.
Embodiments of the present invention avoid the above-described disadvantages of prior fluidic lenses that utilize microfluidic pumps or electrowetting. The integrated electrostatic actuator/lens approach utilized in embodiments of the present invention is highly scalable and provides practical solutions for relatively large radius lenses, e.g., lenses having a radius greater than about 5 mm. Lenses according to embodiments of the present invention may exhibit the following advantageous scalability factors for a focal power range of about 100 Diopters. The actuation voltage is expected to remain <50V. The complexity and cost are expected to increase proportionally with lens size. The actuation stroke required for a focal power range of 100 Diopters in large lenses is expected to be relatively small (e.g., <50 mm). The actuator size is expected to scale linearly with lens size. In addition fast response times (e.g., less than about 100 milliseconds) are believed to be possible with electrostatically actuated fluidic lenses according to embodiments of the present invention.
As can be seen from
As can be seen from the foregoing discussion, embodiments of the present invention address scalability issues that plagued prior art fluidic lenses. Specifically, a large (10 mm dia aperture) simple (parallel plate) device cannot displace the required volume of fluid in order to achieve a 50 diopter range of focal power per membrane using a 15 mm electrode radius and starting from a 25 micron gap. There is not enough fluid to fill the lens to that level. A larger gap takes higher voltage even with low viscosity fluids. Very low viscosity bring back the snap-down effect to parallel plate capacitors. However, embodiments of the present invention provide multiple solution paths to these problems. Specifically, an air-gap zipper actuator provides significant advantages over prior art parallel plate actuators. In some embodiments flow amplification may be used to increase the volume of fluid displaced. In other embodiments, two or more fluidic lenses may be stacked in series in a compound lens to increase the overall range of focal power of the compound lens. Alternatively, two or more actuators may be stacked in a single lens to increase fluid volume displacement.
In the above preferred embodiment, applying a voltage led to an increase in membrane curvature and increased positive focal power. Alternatively, applying a voltage may lead decreased membrane curvature and/or increased negative focal power. For example,
The electrostatic fluidic lens may be assembled as follows. The electrodes may be glued to the conductor retainers. The electrodes may be cut to shape if needed. One glued membrane is inserted onto the grommet and the fixed spacer is placed over the over the corresponding conductor retainer. The other electrode is then placed onto the grommet and the grommet is heat staked to secure the two electrodes together. The top plate is then put on the conductor retainer and the membrane is stretched over the conductor retainer and clamped over the conductor retainer. Excess membrane material may be cut away so that the membrane forms a surface of the lens. The snap ring is then placed over the top plate and pressed onto the conductor retainer. The snap ring has an internal lip as shown in
Operation of the fluidic lens proceeds as follows. Initially, when no voltage is applied between the electrodes, a wedge-shaped gap is present between the two electrodes as shown in
There are other variations on a negatively acting lens. For example, a negatively active lens may be fabricated as shown in
In this example, a fluid-filled volume of a flexible reservoir is fixed and viscous effects minimized by allowing a sufficient thickness of fluid. One or more electrodes are attached to the flexible reservoir. The electrodes on the reservoir are initially spaced apart from corresponding electrodes on an outer frame by a dielectric-filled gap. In this example, the dielectric material filling the gap between the electrodes is air. In an un-energized state, as shown in
As discussed herein embodiments of the present invention include fluid-filled parallel-plate capacitors capable of squeezing fluid into a centrally-disposed elastic-membrane-delimited lens. Actuation is obtained by application of an electric field between the plates. Pressurization of the fluid causes the membranes to bulge, thereby controllably altering the optical power of the lens. The elastic energy of the membranes provides the restoring force which prevails, once the electric field is diminished.
Embodiments described above include two advantageous features: a) “Double Rim” hydraulic stroke amplification and b) “Single rim” amplification.
“Double Rim” hydraulic stroke amplification occurs when the membrane edge is attached to a fixed support (inner rim) and the fluid from the capacitive reservoir is transferred to the lens area. The average lens stroke may be estimated from the capacitor stroke and the system geometry, e.g., as follows:
In a “Single rim” amplification configuration the membrane is directly attached the inner radius of the capacitor. The volume swept by the moving actuator is defined by the area circumscribed by the outer capacitor radius, including the lens area. The average lens stroke may be estimated from:
Additional embodiments of the present invention overcome the limitations of earlier parallel-plate devices by providing a shaped plate with sections separately optimized for maximum electrostatic force and for minimum viscous resistance to flow.
The predicted dynamic performance for this configuration is depicted in
To further improve the performance of this electro-fluidic lens, the actuator area is segregated from the fluid reservoir by a flexible seal. This reduces viscous effects very significantly, and permits a simpler mechanical construction.
As can be seen from
When a voltage is applied between the electrodes 3102, 3104, they are attracted to each other and exert a force against the flexible seals 3110. The force axially compresses the flex seals 3110 forcing fluid toward the aperture. The membranes 3114 expand in response to the resulting displacement of fluid thereby changing their radius of curvature and the focal length of the lens. Thin corner spacers 3108 can be seen near the corners of the gaps between the mid-plane spacer 3106 and electrodes 3102, 3104. The corner spacers 3108 are designed to prevent the gap from going into the pull-in (snap-down) range. They can also make the possible mis-orientation of the lenses very small. The corner spacers 3108 may be integrally formed as part of the mid-plane spacer 3106 or they may be formed separately.
The predicted performance for this configuration (referred to herein as a DryCap) is shown in
A possible assembly sequence for the above-described electro-fluidic lens may proceed as follows:
The above-described sequence is listed for the purpose of example and should be viewed as a limitation upon the invention. The steps may be performed in a different order than described above.
During the course of development of fluidic lenses described herein very important characteristic of fluid-filled elastic membranes was discovered. The elastic restoring force exerted by the stretched membrane upon the pressurized fluid is a complicated function of the actuator stroke. This function can be approximated by a cubic in actuator displacement with a very good accuracy for the range of parameters of interest in a practical device. Unlike a normal spring, a “cubic spring” stiffens up very rapidly as the stretching advances. This observation was the key to the conception of a Double Lens variant of the above-described electro-fluidic lens. If the volume of fluid displaced by the moving electrode actuator were to be shared among two membrane domes, each one of them would undergo only half of the lens displacement of the previous embodiment. The two domes, taken together would have an optical power roughly equal to that of the previous variant (along with some increase in Fresnel reflection and scattering losses), but due to the nonlinear elasticity, the required actuator force would decrease by a factor of 8, and the voltage by a nominal factor of about 2.8.
First and second transparent inner membranes 3412, 3414 cover opposite sides of the central aperture 3401 in the mid-plane spacer 3406. Fluid fills an upper lens section bounded by the upper recess 3418, the upper flex seal 3422, upper membrane 3410 and first inner membrane 3412. Fluid fills a lower lens section bounded by the lower recess 3420, the lower flex seal 3424, lower membrane 3416 and second inner membrane 3414. A vent hole 3428 allows air to flow freely in and out of a space between the two inner membranes 3412, 3414. A filler hole 3408 communicates with both the upper and lower recesses 3418, 3420 to permit simultaneous filling of both lens sections.
A possible assembly sequence may proceed as follows.
As anticipated and shown in
Fluidic lenses of the various types shown herein may be used in many different types of optical instruments. Examples of such instruments include a camera, zoom lens, lens system, eyeglasses, telescope, cell phone camera, mobile email device camera, web camera, video phone, microscope, magnifier, eyepiece, telephoto lens, zoom lens, mirror, anamorphic aspect ratio lens, projector, projection television, plasma display, di-chromatic optical element, theodolite, fiber optic coupler, radar system, currency authentication device, or video surveillance system. Examples of such instruments are described in US Patent Publication 20070030573, which is incorporated herein by reference.
In addition, fluidic lenses of the various types described herein may be used in combinatorial optical processors of a type having one or more optical modules; wherein at least one of the one or more optical modules includes N addressable optical elements, where N is an integer greater than or equal to 1. Such combinatorial optical processors are described, e.g., in US Patent Application Publication 2002/0158866 A1, which has been incorporated herein by reference. In addition, variable focus lenses, such as those described herein may be stacked together with zero or more additional variable focal length lenses in a digital focus lens system, e.g., as shown in
While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is possible to use various alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Therefore, the scope of the present invention should be determined not with reference to the above description but should, instead, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with their full scope of equivalents. In the claims that follow, the indefinite article “A”, or “An” refers to a quantity of one or more of the item following the article, except where expressly stated otherwise. The appended claims are not to be interpreted as including means-plus-function limitations, unless such a limitation is explicitly recited in a given claim using the phrase “means for.” Any feature described herein, whether preferred or not, may be combined with any other feature, whether preferred or not.
This application claims the benefit of priority of the U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/747,181, entitled “ELECTROSTATIC ACTUATION OF FLUIDIC LENS”, filed May 12, 2006, which is hereby incorporated by reference. This application is a continuation-in-part of commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/383,216 entitled FLUIDIC OPTICAL DEVICE, and published as US Patent Application Publication 20070030573, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/383,216 and the benefit of priority of all applications to which U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/383,216 claims the benefit of priority, including U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/680,632 to Robert G. Batchko et al entitled “FLUIDIC OPTICAL DEVICES”, filed May 14, 2005, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/683,072 to Robert G. Batchko et al entitled “FLUIDIC OPTICAL DEVICES”, filed May 21, 2005, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/703,827 to Robert G. Batchko et al entitled “FLUIDIC OPTICAL DEVICES”, filed Jul. 29, 2005, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/723,381 to Robert G. Batchko et al., filed Oct. 3, 2005, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/747,181. This application also claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/916,739 to Robert G. Batchko et al., filed May 8, 2007, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/617,572, filed Jul. 11, 2003, published as US Patent Application Publication 20040114203 A1 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,072,086, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/333,817, filed Jan. 17, 2006, and published as US Patent Application Publication 2006/0114534 A1, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. application Ser. Nos. 10/617,572 and 11/333,817 claim the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/395,849 filed Jul. 11, 2002, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application is also a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/029,399 filed Oct. 19, 2001 and published as US Patent Application Publication 2002/0158866 A1, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. application Ser. No. 10/029,399 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/242,395 filed Oct. 20, 2000, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application claims the benefit of priority of application Ser. Nos. 11/333,817, 10/617,572, 10/029,399, 60/395,849, and 60/242,395.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60747181 | May 2006 | US | |
60680632 | May 2005 | US | |
60683072 | May 2005 | US | |
60703827 | Jul 2005 | US | |
60723381 | Oct 2005 | US | |
60916739 | May 2007 | US | |
60395849 | Jul 2002 | US | |
60242395 | Oct 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10617572 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 11333817 | Jan 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11383216 | May 2006 | US |
Child | 11747845 | May 2007 | US |
Parent | 10617572 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 11747845 | May 2007 | US |
Parent | 11333817 | Jan 2006 | US |
Child | 11747845 | May 2007 | US |
Parent | 10029399 | Oct 2001 | US |
Child | 11333817 | Jan 2006 | US |