Field of the Invention
This invention relates to fluidic oscillators. More specifically, the invention is a fluidic oscillator array that synchronizes the oscillations of the array's output jets.
Description of the Related Art
In the 1900s, fluidic oscillators were developed for use as logical function operators. More recently, fluidic oscillators have been proposed for use as active flow control devices where an oscillator's jet output is used to control a fluid flow (e.g., gas or liquid).
In order to achieve relatively large scale active flow control, a number of fluidic oscillators (such as the one described above) can be arranged such that their output jets are arrayed in an area requiring flow control. One drawback associated with arrays of fluidic oscillators is that each fluidic oscillator output jet will oscillate independently of other output jets. Therefore, the resulting array output tends to be random in nature. While this result can be preferable for mixing applications, it does not provide the result predictability needed for efficient active flow control.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a fluidic oscillator array.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a fluidic oscillator array whose output jets oscillate in a synchronized fashion.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide an approach that synchronizes oscillating jets without using moving parts and/or electromechanical components.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become more obvious hereinafter in the specification and drawings.
In accordance with the present invention, a fluidic oscillator array includes a plurality of fluidic-oscillator main flow channels. Each main flow channel has an inlet and an outlet wherein a fluid flow is adapted to enter at the inlet and exit at the outlet. Each main flow channel has a first control port and a second control port disposed at opposing sides thereof, and has a first feedback port and a second feedback port disposed at opposing sides thereof. The first feedback port and second feedback port are located downstream of the first control port and second control port, respectively, with respect to a direction of the fluid flow. The system also includes a first fluid accumulator in fluid communication with each first control port and each first feedback port, and a second fluid accumulator in fluid communication with each second control port and each second feedback port.
Referring again to the drawings and more specifically to
In the illustrated embodiment, each (left side) feedback port 26L in array 20 is fluidically coupled to a first feedback accumulator (e.g., enclosed chamber) 30, while each (right side) feedback port 26R in array 20 is fluidically coupled to a second feedback accumulator (e.g., enclosed chamber) 32. Feedback accumulator 30 is fluidically coupled to each (left side) control port 24L in array 20. Similarly, feedback accumulator 32 is fluidically coupled to each (right side) control port 24R in array 20. By virtue of this construction, as fluid flow 100 moves through main flow channel 22, the backflow entering each (left side) feedback port 24L is collected in a single accumulator site before being supplied to the (left side) control ports 26L. Similarly, the backflow entering each (right side) feedback port 24R is collected in a single accumulator site before being supplied to the (right side) control ports 26R. As a result, the sweeping and oscillating jets 110 at outlets 22B are synchronized in terms of the jets' flow direction at outlets 22B.
Fluid flow 100 can be individually supplied to the inlet 22A of each main flow channel 22. Fluid flow 100 could also be supplied to a common plenum 40 (
Arrays constructed in accordance with the present invention can arrange outlets 22B in a variety of geometric configurations without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, outlets 22B could be arranged linearly (
A variety of approaches can be used to construct an array's main flow channels and accumulators. By way of example, a layered construction of a fluidic oscillator array 50 is presented in an exploded view in
Main flow channel layer 52 is tray-like in construction with a common plenum 520 and three main flow channels 522 being formed/defined in a partial thickness of layer 52. This is illustrated in the isolated cross-sectional view of layer 52 shown in
A left side accumulator is formed when layer 54 is coupled to the underside of layer 52 as illustrated. Layer 54 is also tray-like in construction with an accumulator region 540 being formed in a partial thickness of layer 54 as illustrated in
In a similar fashion, a right side accumulator is formed when layer 56 is coupled to the top side of layer 52 as illustrated. Layer 56 is defined by a formed part 56A and a solid top cover 56B. Formed part 56A is tray-like in construction with an accumulator region 560 being formed in a partial thickness thereof as illustrated in
The coupling of all left side control ports to the left side accumulator and all right side control ports to the right side accumulator produces a homogeneous sweeping jet output, i.e., all of the output jets move left/right at the same time. However, it is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the generation of such homogeneous synchronization of weeping jets. That is, it is also possible to configure the present invention to produce heterogeneous synchronization by coupling some of the left side control ports to the right side accumulator and some of the right side control ports to the left side accumulator. For example, in the three-oscillator array used for illustration herein, the control ports of the first and third oscillators could retain the left/right coupling as described above, while the second (middle) oscillator has its right side control port coupled to the left side accumulator and its left side control port coupled to the right side accumulator. In this way, as the output jets from the first and third oscillators are sweeping to the left, the output jet from the second oscillator would be sweeping to the right, i.e., output jet from the second oscillator would be 180° out-of-phase with respect to the output jets from the first and third oscillators. However, the outputs would remain predictable and synchronous. Other patterns of control port coupling could be used without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The advantages of the present invention are numerous. An array of fluidic oscillators can provide a synchronized oscillating (e.g., sweeping, out-of phase, etc.) output through the use of feedback accumulators. Synchronization is achieved simply and without requiring the addition of any moving parts. The principles of the present invention can be applied to any fluidic oscillator design that is designed to use feedback loops to control output oscillations.
Although the invention has been described relative to specific embodiments thereof, there are numerous variations and modifications that will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described.
This patent application is a divisional of and claims the benefit of priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/786,713 titled “Fluidic Oscillator Array for Synchronized Oscillating Jet Generation” filed on Mar. 6, 2013. The contents of the foregoing application are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. This application is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/786,608, titled “Fluidic Oscillator Having Decoupled Frequency and Amplitude Control,” filed on Mar. 6, 2013, and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/146,484, titled “Fluidic Oscillator Having Decoupled Frequency and Amplitude Control,” filed on May 4, 2016.
This invention was made by an employee of the United States Government and may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3158166 | Warren | Nov 1964 | A |
3605778 | Metzger | Sep 1971 | A |
4185777 | Bauer | Jan 1980 | A |
4482366 | Camplin | Nov 1984 | A |
4508267 | Stouffer | Apr 1985 | A |
4596364 | Bauer | Jun 1986 | A |
4955547 | Woods | Sep 1990 | A |
5860603 | Raghu et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6948244 | Crockett | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7128082 | Cerretelli | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7293722 | Srinath | Nov 2007 | B1 |
20120037731 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2554854 | Feb 2013 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Gad-El-Hak, M., “FlowControl,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, Oct. 1989, pp. 261-293, vol. 42, No. 10. |
Greenblatt, D. and Wygnanski, I. J., “The control of flow separation by periodic excitation,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2000, pp. 487-545, vol. 36. |
Magill, J. C. and McManus, K. R., “Exploring the Feasibility of Pulsed Jet Separation Control for Aircraft Configurations,” Journal of Aircraft, Jan.-Feb. 2001, pp. 48-56, vol. 38, No. 1. |
Roth, J. R., Sherman, D. M., and Wilkinson, S. P., “Electrohydrodynamic Flow Control with a Glow-Discharge Surface Plasma,” AIAA Journal, Jul. 2000, pp. 1166-1172, vol. 38, No. 7. |
Enloe, C. L., McLaughlin, T. E., Vandyken, R. D., Kachner, K. D., Jumper, E. J., Corke, T. C., Post, M., and Haddad, O., “Mechanisms and Responses of a Single Dielectric Barrier Plasma Actuator Geometric Effects,” AIAA Journal, Mar. 2004, pp. 595-604, vol. 42, No. 3. |
Glezer, A. and Amitay, M., “Synthetic Jets,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2002, pp. 503-529, vol. 34. |
Viets, H., “Flip-Flop Jet Nozzle,” AIAA Journal, Oct. 1975, pp. 1375-1379, vol. 13, No. 10. |
Beale, R. B. and Lawler, M. T., “Development of a Wall-Attachment Fluidic Oscillator Applied to Volume Flow Metering,” 1997, pp. 989-996, vol. 1, Issue Pt. 2. |
Wang, H., Beck, S. B. M., Priestman, G. H., and Boucher, R. F., “Fluidic Pressure Pulse Transmitting Flowmeter,” Chemical Engineering Research & Design. Transactions of the Institute of Chemical Engineers, May 1997, pp. 381-391, vol. 75, No. A4. |
Desalvo, M., Whalen, E., and Glezer, A., “High-Lift Enhancement using Fluidic Actuation,” 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL; AIAA 2010-863; Jan. 4-7, 2010, pp. 1-17. |
Seele, R., Tewes, P., Woszidlo, R., McVeigh, M. A., Lucas, N. J., and Wygnanski, I. J., “Discrete Sweeping Jets as Tools for Improving the Performance of the V-22,” Journal of Aircraft, Nov.-Dec. 2009, pp. 2098-2106, vol. 46, No. 6. |
Phillips, E., Woszidlo, R., and Wygnanski, I., “The Dynamics of Separation Control on a Rapidly Actuated Flap”, AIAA 2010-4246, AIAA 5th Flow Control Conference, Chicago, Illinois, Jun. 28-Jul. 1, 2010, pp. 1-16. |
Cerretelli, C., Wuerz, W., and Gharaibah, E., “Unsteady Separation Control on Wind Turbine Blades Using Fluidic Oscillators,” AIAA Journal, Jul. 2010, pp. 1302-1311, vol. 48, No. 7. |
Gregory, J. W., Gnanamanickam, E. P., Sullivan, J. P., and Raghu, S., “Variable-Frequency Fluidic Oscillator Driven by Piezoelectric Bender,” AIAA Journal, Nov. 2009, pp. 2717-2725, vol. 47, No. 11. |
Tesar, V., “The Guided Jet Principle,” Fluidics Quarterly, pp. 77-99. |
Taft, C. K., and Herrick, B. M., “A Proportional Piezoelectric Electro-Pneumatic Servovalve Design,” Proceedings of the Joint Automotive Control Conference, 1981, WA-8A. |
Chen, R., and Lucas, G. G., “An Investigation into the Use of Piezo-Fluidic Combined Units as Fuel Injectors for Natural Gas Engines,” International Fall Fuels & Lubricants Meeting & Exposition, Oct. 14-17, 1996, pp. 131-142, vol. 1208, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA, USA. |
Chen, R., “Piezo-fluidic Gaseous Fuel MPI System for Natural Gas Fuelled IC Engines,” JSME International Journal, Series B (Fluids and Thermal Engineering), 2001, pp. 158-165, vol. 44, No. 1. |
Gregory, J. W., Ruotolo, J. C., Byerley, A. R., and McLaughlin, T. E., “Switching Behavior of a Plasma-Fluidic Actuator,” 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2007-0785, Reno, NV, Jan. 8-11, 2007, pp. 1-11. |
Gokoglu, S. A., Kuczmarski, M. A., Culley, D. E., and Raghu, S., “Numerical Studies of a Fluidic Diverter for Flow Control,” AIAA-2009-4012, 39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Antonio, TX, Jun. 22-25, 2009, pp. 1-14. |
Culley, D. E., “Variable Frequency Diverter Actuation for Flow Control,” 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference, AIAA Paper 2006-3034, San Francisco, California, Jun. 5-8, 2006, pp. 1-12. |
Gokoglu, S. A., Kuczmarski, M. A., Culley D. E., and Raghu, S., “Numerical Studies of an Array of Fluidic Diverter Actuators for Flow Control,” 41st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, AIAA 2011-3100, Honolulu, Hawaii, Jun. 27-30, 2011, pp. 1-11. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160243561 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13786713 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 15145655 | US |