This application is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/786,713, titled “Fluidic Oscillator Array for Synchronized Oscillating Jet Generation,” filed on the same day as this application.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to fluidic oscillators. More specifically, the invention is a fluidic oscillator having frequency control features that allow the oscillator's frequency to be controlled independently of the oscillator's mass flow rate or amplitude.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the 1900s, fluidic oscillators were developed for use as logical function operators. More recently, fluidic oscillators have been proposed for use as active flow control devices where an oscillator's jet output is used to control a fluid flow (e.g., gas or liquid).
For conventional fluidic oscillators, the frequency of the oscillations is directly dependent on the supply pressure and hence mass flow rate (or amplitude) of the oscillator. However, for practical applications, it is highly desirable to decouple the frequency and amplitude of the oscillator so that the frequency of the oscillator could be controlled independently of its amplitude. A frequency-decoupled fluidic oscillator could thus deliver desired mass flow rates without changing the frequency or could deliver desired frequency oscillations at desired mass flow rates.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a fluidic oscillator having frequency control features.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a fluidic oscillator whose frequency is independent of the oscillator's mass flow rate or amplitude.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method of decoupling frequency control from amplitude control in a fluidic oscillator.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become more obvious hereinafter in the specification and drawings.
In accordance with the present invention, a fluidic oscillator having independent frequency and amplitude control includes a fluidic-oscillator main flow channel having a main flow inlet and a main flow outlet. The main flow channel has a first control port and a second control port disposed at opposing sides thereof. The main flow channel defines a first volume between the main flow inlet and the main flow outlet. A fluidic-oscillator controller has an inlet and outlet with a second volume being defined between its inlet and outlet. The first volume defined by the main flow channel is greater than the second volume defined by the controller. A flow diverter coupled to the outlet of the controller defines a first fluid flow path from the outlet to the first control port and defines a second fluid flow path from the outlet to the second control port.
Referring again to the drawings and more specifically to
Main oscillating-flow channel 22 is configured as the main flow channel of a conventional fluidic oscillator, but does not have conventional feedback loops coupled thereto. That is, channel 22 only has an inlet 22A for receiving a (main or amplitude-controlling) fluid flow 100, an outlet 22B through which the fluid flow will exit as an oscillating jet 110, opposing Coanda surfaces 22C/22D, and opposing-side control ports 22E/22F. The particular shape/configuration of inlet 22A, outlet 22B, Coanda surfaces 22C/22D, and ports 22E/22F are not limitations of the present invention. The volume V22 of main oscillating-flow channel 22 (i.e., between inlet 22A and outlet 22B) is known.
Frequency-controlling fluidic oscillator 24 is configured as a conventional fluidic oscillator having an inlet 24A for receiving a (frequency controlling) fluid flow 200 and an outlet 24B through which the fluid flow will exit as an oscillating jet 210. Fluidic oscillator 24 will also include conventional feedback loops terminating in feedback and control ports (not shown) used in the creation of oscillating jet 210 as would be understood in the art. The volume V24 of fluidic oscillator 24 is known and should be smaller than the volume V22 of main oscillating-flow channel 22. For reasons that will be explained further below, the smaller volume of fluidic oscillator 24 ensures that the mass flow rate (amplitude) of fluidic oscillator 24 is less than that of main oscillating-flow channel 22.
Fluid flow diverter 26 is a fluid-flow splitting device used to direct oscillating jet 210 in an alternating fashion to control ports 22E and 22F of main oscillating-flow channel 22. The frequency of oscillating jet 210 serves as the frequency control for main oscillating-flow channel 22 producing oscillating jet 110. Since frequency-controlling fluidic oscillator 24 only needs to disturb the flow moving through channel 22 (i.e., analogous to disruptions provided by feedback loops in conventional fluidic oscillators), a relatively small mass flow through oscillator 24 is all that is required. In general, the smaller mass flow for frequency control is achieved when the volume V22 is at least twice as large as the volume V24. However, it is to be understood that the volume differential between main oscillating-flow channel 22 and fluidic oscillator 24 can be tailored for a specific application without departing from the scope of the present invention.
A variety of approaches can be used to construct a frequency-controlled fluidic oscillator 24 in accordance with the present invention. By way of example, a layered-construction fluidic oscillator 50 will be explained herein with simultaneous reference to
In general, panel 70 has the main oscillating-flow channel's shape/volume formed on one face thereof and the frequency-controlling fluidic oscillator's shape/volume formed on the opposing face thereof. When panels 60 and 80 sandwich panel 70, the main oscillating-flow channel and frequency-controlling fluidic oscillator of oscillator 50 are formed. The present invention's fluid flow diverter is formed in panel 70. More specifically, one face of panel 70 defines a plenum region 72 that receives incoming fluid flow 100 (i.e., the main or amplitude-controlling fluid flow) via inlet hole 62. Main oscillating-flow channel 22 has its inlet 22A in fluid communication with plenum region 72. Control ports 22E/22F are disposed on either side of main oscillating-flow channel 22. As mentioned above, the particular shape/configuration of main oscillating-flow channel 22 is not a limitation of the present invention. The opposing face of panel 70 defines a plenum region 74 (visible in
Diverter 26 is in fluid communication with outlet 24B of frequency-controlling fluidic oscillator 24 and control ports 22C/22D of main oscillating-flow channel 22. More specifically, a first flow path 26A formed in and through panel 70 is directed from outlet 24B to control port 22E, while a second flow path 26B formed in and through panel 70 is directed from outlet 24B to control port 22F. In this way, the frequency-controlling oscillating jet 210 is supplied to control ports 22E/22F in an alternating fashion in accordance with the frequency of oscillating jet 210.
The advantages of the present invention are numerous. Frequency control of the fluidic oscillator's main oscillating-flow channel is decoupled from its amplitude. In this way, a desired mass flow rate (i.e., through the main oscillating-flow channel) can be delivered without changing the frequency thereof, or the frequency can be changed while maintaining a particular mass flow rate (i.e., through the main oscillating-flow channel). The approach is simple and requires no moving parts.
Although the invention has been described relative to specific embodiments thereof, there are numerous variations and modifications that will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described.
The invention was made by an employee of the United States Government and may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4508267 | Stouffer | Apr 1985 | A |
4596364 | Bauer | Jun 1986 | A |
4955547 | Woods | Sep 1990 | A |
5860603 | Raghu et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6948244 | Crockett | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7293722 | Srinath et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
20120037731 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2554854 | Feb 2013 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Gad-El-Hak, M., “Flow Control,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, Oct. 1989, pp. 261-293, vol. 42, No. 10. |
Greenblatt, D. and Wygnanski, I. J., “The control of flow separation by periodic excitation,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2000, pp. 487-545, vol. 36, Issue 7. |
Magill, J. C. and McManus, K. R., “Exploring the Feasibility of Pulsed Jet Separation Control for Aircraft Configurations,” Journal of Aircraft, Jan.-Feb. 2001, pp. 48-56, vol. 38, No. 1. |
Roth, J. R., Sherman, D. M., and Wilkinson, S. P., “Electrohydrodynamic Flow Control with a Glow-Discharge Surface Plasma,” AIAA Journal, Jul. 2000, pp. 1166-1172, vol. 38, No. 7. |
Enloe, C. L., McLaughlin, T. E., Vandyken, R. D., Kachner, K. D., Jumper, E. J., Corke, T. C., Post. M., and Haddad, O., “Mechanisms and Responses of a Single Dielectric Barrier Plasma Actuator: Geometric Effects,” AIAA Journal, Mar. 2004, pp. 595-604, vol. 42, No. 3. |
Glezer, A. and Amitay, M., “Synthetic Jets,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2002, pp. 503-529, vol. 34. |
Viets, H., “Flip-Flop Jet Nozzle,” AIAA Journal, Oct. 1975, pp. 1375-1379, vol. 13, No. 10. |
Beale, R. B. and Lawler, M. T., “Development of a Wall-Attachment Fluidic Oscillator Applied to Volume Flow Metering,” 1997, pp. 989-996, vol. 1, Issue Pt. 2. |
Wang, H., Beck, S. B. M., Priestman, G. H., and Boucher, R. F., “Fluidic Pressure Pulse Transmitting Flowmeter,” Chemical Engineering Research & Design, Transactions of the Institute of Chemical Engineers, May 1997, pp. 381-391, vol. 75, No. A4. |
Desalvo, M., Whalen, E., and Glezer, A., “High-Lift Enhancement using Fluidic Actuation,” 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL; AIAA 2010-863; Jan. 4-7, 2010, pp. 1-17. |
Seele, R., Tewes, P., Woszidlo, R., McVeigh, M. A., Lucas, N. J., and Wygnanski, I. J., “Discrete Sweeping Jets as Tools for Improving the Performance of the V-22,” Journal of Aircraft, Nov.-Dec. 2009, pp. 2098-2106, vol. 46, No. 6. |
Phillips, E., Woszidlo, R., and Wygnanski, I., “The Dynamics of Separation Control on a Rapidly Actuated Flap”, AIAA 2010-4246, AIAA 5th Flow Control Conference, Chicago, Illinois, Jun. 28-Jul. 1, 2010, pp. 1-16. |
Cerretelli C., Wuerz, W., and Gharaibah, E., “Unsteady Separation Control on Wind Turbine Blades Using Fluidic Oscillators,” AIAA Journal, Jul. 2010, pp. 1302-1311, vol. 48, No. 7. |
Gregory, J. W., Gnanamanickam, E. P., Sullivan, J. P., and Raghu, S., “Variable-Frequency Fluidic Oscillator Driven by Piezoelectric Bender,” AIAA Journal, Nov. 2009, pp. 2717-2725, vol. 47, No. 11. |
Tesar, V., “The Guided Jet Principle,” Fluidics Quarterly, vol. 3, No. 4, 1971, pp. 77-99. |
Taft, C. K., and Herrick, B. M., “A Proportional Piezoelectric Electro-Pneumatic Servovalve Design,” Proceedings of the Joint Automotive Control Conference, The American Automatic Control Council, Charlottesville, Virginia, Jun. 17-19, 1981, Paper No. WA-8A. |
Chen, R., and Lucas, G. G., “An Investigation into the Use of Piezo-Fluidic Combined Units as Fuel Injectors for Natural Gas Engines,” International Fall Fuels & Lubricants Meeting & Exposition, Oct. 14-17, 1996, pp. 131-142, vol. 1208, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. |
Chen, R., “Piezo-fluidic Gaseous Fuel MPI System for Natural Gas Fuelled IC Engines,” JSME International Journal, Series B (Fluids and Thermal Engineering), 2001, pp. 158-165, vol. 44, No. 1. |
Gregory, J. W., Ruotolo, J. C., Byerley, A. R., and McLaughlin, T. E., “Switching Behavior of a Plasma-Fluidic Actuator,” 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2007-0785, Reno, NV, Jan. 8-11, 2007, pp. 1-11. |
Gokoglu, S. A., Kuczmarski, M. A., Culley, D. E., and Raghu, S., “Numerical Studies of a Fluidic Diverter for Flow Control,” AIAA-2009-4012, 39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Antonio, TX, Jun. 22-25, 2009, pp. 1-14. |
Culley, D. E., “Variable Frequency Diverter Actuation for Flow Control,” 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference, AIAA Paper 2006-3034, San Francisco, California, Jun. 5-8, 2008, pp. 1-12. |
Gokoglu, S. A., Kuczmarski, M. A., Culley D. E., and Raghu, S., “Numerical Studies of an Array of Fluidic Diverter Actuators for Flow Control,” 41st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, AIAA 2011-3100, Honolulu, Hawaii, Jun. 27-30, 2011, pp. 1-11. |
Gokoglu, S. A., Kuczmarski, M. A., Culley, D. E., and Raghu, S., “Numerical Studies of a Fluidic Diverter for Flow Control,” NASA/TM-2009-216088, Dec. 2009. |
Taft, C. K., and Herrick, B. M., “A Proportional Piezoelectric Electro-Pneumatic Valve Deaign,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, vol. 103, No. 4, 1981, pp. 361-365. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150238982 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |