Fluorescent fiberoptic probe for tissue health discrimination and method of use thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6768918
  • Patent Number
    6,768,918
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 10, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 27, 2004
    19 years ago
Abstract
A system and method for the in situ discrimination of healthy and diseased tissue. A fiberoptic based probe is employed to direct ultraviolet illumination onto a tissue specimen and to collect the fluorescent response radiation. The response radiation is observed at three selected wavelengths, one of which corresponds to an isosbestic point. In one example, the isosbestic point occurs at about 431 nm. The intensities of the observed signals are normalized using the 431 nm intensity. A score is determined using the ratios in a discriminant analysis. The tissue under examination is resected or not, based on the diagnosis of disease or health, according to the outcome of the discriminant analysis.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates generally to diagnosis of disease. More particularly, the invention relates to in vivo diagnosis by optical methods.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Colonic polyps appear as two major types, neoplastic and non-neoplastic. Non-neoplastic polyps are benign with no direct malignant potential and do not necessarily need to be resected. Hyperplastic polyps, juvenile polyps, mucosal prolapse and normal mucosal polyps are examples of non-neoplastic polyps. Conversely, neoplastic polyps are pre-malignant, a condition requiring resection and further surveillance. Examples of premalignant neoplastic polyps are tubular adenoma, villous adenoma and tubulovillous adenoma.




Conventional laser-induced fluorescence emission and reflectance spectroscopy can distinguish between neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissue with accuracies approaching about 85%. However, typically these methods require that the full spectrum be measured with algorithms dependent on many emission wavelengths.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The invention provides in vivo diagnostic methods based upon the normalized intensity of light emitted from tissue. In particular, it is an observation of the invention that relevant diagnostic information is provided by comparing the intensities of light emitted from a tissue at two different wavelengths, both normalized over the intensity of light emitted from the same tissue at about 431 nm.




Thus, according to the invention, a comparison of the intensities of two different wavelengths normalized using the intensity at about 431 nm provides diagnostic insight. Preferred methods of the invention comprise obtaining a fluorescent emission having a first intensity at a first wavelength and a second intensity at a wavelength; normalizing the first and second intensities with respect to an intensity at a wavelength of about 431 nm to produce first and second normalized intensities; and determining a state of health of the tissue based upon a comparison of the first and second normalized intensities.




In one embodiment, methods of the invention comprise determining the state of health of the tissue using a classifier function in which the first and second normalized intensities are inputs. In one embodiment, the classifier function is a discrimination function, preferably a linear discrimination function. In other embodiments, the discrimination function is a non-linear discrimination function.




The invention can be applied to analyze a broad range of tissues. Preferably, the tissue to be analyzed is a tissue comprising epithelial cells. In one embodiment, the tissue is selected from the group consisting of cervical tissue, colonic tissue, esophogeal tissue, bladder tissue, and bronchial tissue.




Classifying or comparing normalized intensities into one or more groups may be performed by any acceptable means. There are numerous acceptable approaches to such classifications. For example, one general method of grouping the two normalized intensities is a Bayesian-based classifier using Mahalanobis distances. The Mahalanobis distance is well-known in statistical analysis, and is used to measure a distance between data in a multidimensional space based on characteristics that represent a degree of relationship among the data. Bayesian probabilities have been known in statistical analysis for many years. Specific Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier can be selected from linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, and regularized discriminant analysis. As those familiar with statistical analysis will recognize, linear discrimination analysis and quadratic discriminant analysis are methods that are computationally efficient. Regularized discriminant analysis uses a biasing method based on two parameters to estimate class covariance matrices.




Other ways of comparing the normalized intensities include a binary tree classifier, and an unsupervised learning cluster classifier. Unsupervised learning is characterized by the absence of explicit examples showing what an input/output relation should be. Examples of an unsupervised learning cluster classifier include hierarchical clustering analysis, principal component analysis, fuzzy c-means analysis, and fuzzy k-means analysis. Each of the forgoing analytical techniques is well known in the statistical analysis literature. For example, the fuzzy c-means algorithm divides a data set having an integer number n data points into an integer number c fuzzy clusters, where n>c, while determining a location for each cluster in a multi-dimensional space.




In another aspect, the invention features systems for determining the state of health of a tissue. Systems of the invention comprise an illumination source for illuminating a tissue; a detector for receiving from the tissue light comprising a first intensity at a first wavelength and a second intensity at a second wavelength; a computational module for normalizing the first and second intensities with respect to received light having an intensity at a wavelength of about 431 nm to produce first and second normalized intensities; and an analysis module for determining a state of health of the tissue based upon a comparison of the first and second normalized intensities.




In a preferred embodiment, a system of the invention comprises an optical fiber as the illumination source. The detector may receive light from the tissue by way of a plurality of optical fibers. In a preferred embodiment, at least one of the optical fibers of the system is placed directly in contact with tissue. Preferably, the light received from the tissue is fluorescent light. The analysis module of a system of the invention may comprise a Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier function. The Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier may be selected from the group consisting of linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, and regularized discriminant analysis. The analysis module may also comprise a binary tree classifier function or an unsupervised learning cluster classifier. In some embodiments, the unsupervised learning cluster classifier is selected from the group consisting of hierarchical clustering analysis, principal component analysis, fuzzy c-means analysis, and fuzzy k-means analysis.




Systems and methods of the invention are useful in examining a tissue comprising epithelial cells. A method of the invention comprises laser-induced fluorescence using light around 337 nm and a threshold classification model that depends on two fluorescence intensity ratios normalized by the intensity of fluorescence at about 431 nm.




The invention enables determining whether a polyp is neoplastic. Systems and methods of the invention enable such determination at the time of endoscopy particularly for diminutive polyps. In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides for identification of polyps (or other features) under about 10 mm in size. In a further preferred embodiment, the invention provides for identification of polyps (or other features) under about 10 mm in size in real time.




The combination of a new design of a fiberoptic probe for making measurements, an analytic method based on a small number of data points, and a simple method of obtaining a normalization factor for the data used provides enhanced diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps.




The invention provides methods that reliably distinguish between neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissue at the time of endoscopy, colonoscopy, colposcopy, or other similar examinations. As a result, patients with non-neoplastic lesions are not subjected to the risk, discomfort and expense of biopsies or excisions. Patients with neoplastic lesions can be identified immediately and treated.




The foregoing and other objects, aspects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following description and from the claims.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The objects and features of the invention can be better understood with reference to the drawings described below. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the drawings, like numerals are used to indicate like parts throughout the various views.





FIG. 1

is a schematic diagram showing an embodiment of the apparatus according to principles of the invention;





FIG. 2

is a plot of the normalized fluorescence spectra of normal colon, neoplastic polyps and non-neoplastic polyps showing a quasi-isosbestic point at 431 nm, according to an embodiment of the invention;





FIG. 3

is a flow diagram showing the steps of the analytical method according to principles of the invention; and





FIG. 4

is a graph showing polyp classification results obtained using a linear discriminant analysis according to principles of the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




In one aspect, the invention utilizes the intensity of fluorescence observed at an isosbestic-like point as a point for normalization. An isosbestic point is a point in wavelength space (or its equivalent) at which a multi-component system exhibits a constant absorbance independent of the relative proportions of the components. Following normalization to peak fluorescence intensity, polyp fluorescence spectra exhibits nearly constant fluorescence intensities at 431 nm. A preferred isosbestic-like point for use in methods of the invention is 431 nm.




According to the invention, normalizing polyp fluorescence spectra to an isosbestic point is nearly equivalent to normalizing to their peak intensities. Generally, the invention involves illuminating a specimen and observing the intensity of responsive light at each of first and second wavelengths. These intensities are normalized with respect to the intensity of light at an isosbestic point. Normalized intensities are typically obtained by dividing an intensity of responsive light at a wavelength by the intensity of light at the isosbestic wavelength. In a preferred embodiment, the fluorescence isosbestic point occurs at a wavelength of about 431 nm.




The first and second wavelengths may be conveniently selected in accordance with a discrimination function analysis, which is described below in greater detail. The normalized responses are used at input values for the discrimination function analysis. The output of the discrimination function analysis is an indication that the specimen examined is healthy or is diseased.




The discrimination analysis can be linear or nonlinear. In general terms, the discrimination function is a mathematical relationship that is constructed in at least two-dimensional space. The mathematical relationship is constructed in relation to groupings of observations corresponding to one or more known medical conditions as compared to observations corresponding to another known condition (e.g., healthy). The discrimination function used in methods of the invention is a mathematical representation of one or more boundaries that separate observations obtained from the sample being interrogated from those corresponding to one or more groups associated with a known condition. As is appreciated by the skilled artisan, numerous discrimination techniques are available for application of the invention. Numerous such techniques are discussed below.




EXAMPLE I




In one embodiment, the invention is practiced by illuminating tissue with 337 nm excitation light delivered via a single optical fiber. Light that is remitted is collected with a plurality of optical fibers surrounding the illumination fiber. In one embodiment, signals from the individual collection fibers can be averaged into a single spectrum thereby increasing sensitivity. In an alternative embodiment, the signals from the individual collection fibers can be analyzed as discrete signals, for example, by comparing the different signal to determine an extent of tissue that provides a particular response.




An exemplary apparatus


100


used in this embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG.


1


. The apparatus


100


includes a source


110


of 337 nm illumination as the excitation source. The excitation illumination is introduced into an optical fiber


120


for delivery to the tissue under examination. The illumination fiber


120


can be tapered starting at about 0.4 mm in diameter at the proximal end and ending at about 0.1 mm at its distal end. In one embodiment, a plurality of optical fibers


130


are used to collect the response signal from the tissue under examination. In the embodiment shown, six collection fibers


130


are placed in a hexagonal array about the central optical fiber


120


that carries the excitation illumination. This geometry is termed herein the “six-around-one fiberoptic probe.” In alternative embodiments, additional hexagonal layers of fibers disposed so as to surround the collection fibers


130


. The collection fibers are about 0.1 mm in diameter. The fiberoptic catheter


140


is delivered through the accessory port


150


of a typical endoscope


160


with the distal tip


170


gently touching tissue


180


to be examined. In one embodiment, the returned light is separated into fluorescence bands at 403, 414 and 431 nm using a wavelength dispersive element


190


such as a spectrograph or dichroic filter system. The width of the bands should preferably be under 5 nm. Two intensity ratios (I


403


/I


431


and I


414


/I


431


) are then formed and used as input values in a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) threshold model to produce a score indicative of the health of the tissue. Treatment or further diagnostic procedures are based on a characteristic of the score, such as its sign.




This invention, in one embodiment, relates to an optical probe and methods for identifying neoplastic tissues of the colon during endoscopy or colonoscopy and of the cervix of the uterus during colposcopy as well as cancerous and/or pre-cancerous lesions of other organs, such as the esophagus, the urinary bladder, the oral cavity, and the bronchotracheal tree. Systems and methods of the invention can be usefully employed in examining a tissue comprising epithelial cells. A probe according to the invention comprises a plurality of collection fibers surrounding a single illumination fiber. Preferably, the plurality of collection fibers is six fibers. In a preferred embodiment, at least one of the optical fibers of the probe is placed directly in contact with tissue. A method of the invention comprises laser induced fluorescence using 337 nm excitation and a threshold classification model that depends on two fluorescence intensity ratios normalized by the intensity of fluorescence at about 431 nm. In a preferred embodiment, the intensity at about 403 nm is divided by the intensity at about 431 nm and the intensity at about 414 nm is divided by the intensity at 431 nm.




The invention enables determining whether a polyp is neoplastic. Systems and methods of the invention enable such determination at the time of endoscopy particularly for diminutive polyps. In an exemplary embodiment, fluorescent intensity at frequencies other than about 403 nm and about 414 nm are observed, and are normalized by dividing by the intensity of fluorescence observed at about 431 nm.




In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides for identification of polyps (or other features) under about 10 mm in size. In a further preferred embodiment, the invention provides for identification of polyps (or other features) under about 10 mm in size in real time.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, a plot


200


depicting a plurality of response spectra is shown, for different tissue types illuminated with the same 337 nm excitation-light. In the example shown, the spectra observed correspond to tissues including normal colon


210


, non-neoplastic polyps


220


, and neoplastic polyps


230


. There is a quasi-isosbestic point at 431 nm. The spectra


210


,


220


,


230


shown in

FIG. 2

were recorded with the six-around-one fiberoptic probe.




Changes in optical properties of collagen and blood are the predominant factors in diagnostic differentiation among normal tissue, non-neoplastic polyps, and neoplastic polyps. An algorithm that treats collagen fluorescence, having a peak at about 403 nm in the system of the invention, and hemoglobin absorption, having a peak at about 414 nm for oxyhemoglobin, is sensitive to these changes.




Collagen and blood reside underneath the superficial cellular layer. A fiberoptic geometry designed to probe deeper into tissue but not too deep is more sensitive to changes in collagen and blood and hence in differentiating between types of polyps. The six-around-one fiberoptic probe used according to principles of the invention probes deeper into tissue than does a single fiber system.




Interpatient variability in the intensity of fluorescent response is typically large and affects the diagnostic accuracy of techniques based on absolute fluorescence intensities. Historically, effective diagnostic algorithms have used some form of normalization to reduce interpatient variability. One common approach that has been used is to preprocess the data by normalizing the area under each fluorescence spectrum to unity. However, this approach requires that the entire fluorescence spectrum be measured to calculate the area to be used for the normalization factor. The necessity to record an entire spectral response simply to be able to obtain normalization data is redundant and inefficient. The inefficiency is particularly acute if only the emissions at 1 or 2 wavelengths are to be analyzed.




According to the invention, a quasi-isosbestic point exists at about 431 nm between the fluorescence spectra of normal tissue, hyperplastic polyps and adenomatous polyps. The quasi-isosbestic point is used as a normalization factor that provides effective normalization while requiring fluorescence to be measured at only one addition emission wavelength. For other types of pre-cancerous and/or cancerous polyps, other chemical substances are involved in the progress of the disease. These chemical substances provide characteristic signals that can occur at wavelengths other than at about 403 nm and about 414 nm.




The combination of a new design of a fiberoptic probe for making measurements, an analytic method based on a small number of data points, and a simple method of obtaining a normalization factor for the data used provides enhanced diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps. The efficacy of the new system and method is demonstrated in a single-center prospective clinical trial. A higher fraction of polyps were correctly classified with this technique, (e.g., accuracy=86%) when compared to other approaches. The accuracy of the method using two emission wavelengths is better than that obtained in retrospective clinical trials requiring many more wavelengths. A retrospective trial is one in which one determines the sensitivity of an algorithm that was retrospectively optimized with data in hand. A prospective trial is one that uses a retrospectively trained algorithm in a prospective analysis of data collected after the algorithm is defined and tested.




Analysis Method





FIG. 3

is a flow diagram


300


showing the steps of an illustrative analytical method as applied to the optical signals observed from colonic polyps. The method involves, in the example provided above, observing fluorescent intensities at about 403, about 414 and about 431 nm, as shown at step


310


. The ratio of the intensity at about 403 nm to that at about 431 nm (I


403


/I


431


), and the ratio of the intensity at about 414 nm to that at about 431 nm (I


414


/I


431


) are formed, as indicated at step


320


. The two ratios are then examined by comparison to a linear discrimination function, using linear discrimination analysis (LDA), as shown at step


330


. A score value greater than zero is indicative of neoplasia, while a score value less than zero indicates non-neoplasia. Resection can be performed, or omitted, based on the score value that is obtained. Result


340


represents performing resection, while result


350


represents not performing resection.




Sensitivity Analysis





FIG. 4

is a graph


400


showing illustrative polyp classification results obtained using a linear discriminant analysis for the colonic polyp example discussed above. One hundred and fifty patients were enrolled in a prospective study in which 94 polyps were collected from 50 patients. In

FIG. 4

, the about 403 nm to about 431 nm fluorescence intensity ratio (I


403


/I


431


) was plotted along the vertical axis


402


against the about 414 nm to about 431 nm ratio (I


414


/I


431


) plotted along the horizontal axis


404


for a given polyp. The LDA threshold discrimination model is depicted as the line


410


in

FIG. 4

where polyps corresponding to data points that lie above the line


410


are classified as neoplastic polyps and polyps corresponding to data points that lie below the line


410


are classified as non-neoplastic polyps. Using this model, 47 of 52 neoplastic polyps and 34 of 42 non-neoplastic polyps were classified correctly resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 81%, respectively. In addition, 80 of 86 normal colonic tissue sites and 3 of 3 frank adenocarcinomas were correctly classified.




Other Examples




The apparatus of

FIG. 1

is used in other exemplary systems and methods of the invention. Specimens to be tested for diagnostic purposes are illuminated with excitation radiation, such as 337 nm illumination. Intensities of fluorescent responses at first and second wavelengths are observed, and are normalized using an intensity of a response at an isosbestic point. In preferred embodiments, the isosbestic point occurs at 431 nm. The normalized intensities are analyzed by comparison to a discrimination function.




Various linear or non-linear discriminant functions can be devised using the complex relationship between tissue fluorescence measured on the surface and the distribution of different fluorophores that exist in different tissue layers. The analysis is further complicated by primary absorption of the excitation light and secondary absorption of the emitted light at different wavelengths by the same fluorophores and other chromophores as the light used for excitation and the emitted light propagate through scattering media such as tissue. Diagnostic systems and methods of the invention will operate according to a non-linear discriminant when an excess and/or a deficit of one or more of such substances is indicative of a condition of health.




Diagnostic systems and methods of the invention will operate according to a nonlinear discriminant based on other factors as well. For example, in the field of colposcopy, nonlinear discriminants can vary with other factors such as the age or race of the patient or whether the patient is pre-, peri- or post-menopausal.




Potential Cost Savings




The ability to identify and distinguish benign and malignant polyps in situ could result in substantial cost savings. In this particular example, 39 of 94 polyps would have been spared from being resected and biopsied, representing a 41% savings in surgical and pathology charges. However, at present there is a false negative rate of 9.6%. The long term outcome of not resecting these polyps will need to be determined. In comparison, other techniques spared 14% of the polyps from being biopsied and had a false negative rate of 0.9%. If polyps greater than 5 mm in the latter study are excluded from this analysis, then 27% of the polyps would not have been biopsied and the technique would have a 3.2% false negative rate.




Application to Other Tissues




The systems and methods of the invention have been described with regard to observations on colonic tissue. The invention, involving a new probe design and analytical method, can enhance the accuracy for identifying neoplasia in other tissues such as the cervix of the uterus, the esophagus, the urinary bladder, the oral cavity, and the bronchotracheal tree.




Equivalents




While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A method for determining the state of health of a tissue in vivo, the method comprising the steps of:obtaining from a tissue a fluorescent emission comprising a first intensity at a first wavelength and a second intensity at a second wavelength; normalizing said first and second intensities with respect to an intensity at a wavelength that corresponds substantially with an isosbestic point thereby to produce first and second normalized intensities, wherein said isosbestic point is a wavelength of between about 426 nm and about 436 nm; and determining a state of health of said tissue based upon a comparison of said first and second normalized intensities.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said isosbestic point is a wavelength of about 431 nm.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said determining step comprises using a classifier function in which said first and second normalized intensities are inputs.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein said classifier function is a discrimination function.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein said discrimination function is a linear discrimination function.
  • 6. The method of claim 4, wherein said discrimination function is a non-linear discrimination function.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein said tissue is a tissue comprising epithelial cells.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said tissue is selected from the group consisting of cervical tissue, colonic tissue, gastroesophageal tissue, bladder tissue, and bronchial tissue.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparison is performed using a Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein said Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier is selected from the group consisting of linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, and regularized discriminant analysis.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparison is performed using a binary tree classifier.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparison is performed using an unsupervised learning cluster classifier.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein said an unsupervised learning cluster classifier is selected from the group consisting of hierarchical clustering analysis, principal component analysis, fuzzy c-means analysis, and fuzzy k-means analysis.
  • 14. A system for determining the state of health of a tissue, the system comprising:an illumination source for illuminating a tissue; a detector for receiving from said tissue light comprising a first intensity at a first wavelength and a second intensity at a second wavelength; a computational module for normalizing said first and second intensities with respect to received light comprising an intensity at a wavelength that corresponds substantially with an isosbestic point thereby to produce first and second normalized intensities, wherein said isosbetic point is a wavelength of between about 426 nm and about 436 nm; and an analysis module for determining a state of health of said tissue based upon a comparison of said first and second normalized intensities.
  • 15. The system of claim 14, wherein said isosbestic point is a wavelength of about 431 nm.
  • 16. The system of claim 14, wherein said illumination source comprises an optical fiber.
  • 17. The system of claim 14, wherein said detector receives light from said tissue by way of a plurality of optical fibers.
  • 18. The system of claim 14, wherein said light is fluorescent light.
  • 19. The system of claim 14, wherein said analysis module comprises a Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier function.
  • 20. The system of claim 19, wherein said Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier is selected from the group consisting of linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, and regularized discriminant analysis.
  • 21. The system of claim 14, wherein said analysis module comprises a binary tree classifier function.
  • 22. The system of claim 14, wherein said analysis module comprises an unsupervised learning cluster classifier.
  • 23. The system of claim 22, wherein said unsupervised learning cluster classifier is selected from the group consisting of hierarchical clustering analysis, principal component analysis, fuzzy c-means analysis, and fuzzy k-means analysis.
GOVERNMENT RIGHTS

This invention was made with government support under a Small Business Innovation Research Grant (Contract # 1R43CA75773-01) awarded by the Department of Health and Human Services. The government may have certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (218)
Number Name Date Kind
3013467 Minsky Dec 1961 A
3632865 Haskell et al. Jan 1972 A
3809072 Ersek et al. May 1974 A
3890462 Limb et al. Jun 1975 A
3963019 Quandt et al. Jun 1976 A
D242393 Bauman Nov 1976 S
D242396 Bauman Nov 1976 S
D242397 Bauman Nov 1976 S
D242398 Bauman Nov 1976 S
4017192 Rosenthal et al. Apr 1977 A
4071020 Puglise Jan 1978 A
4198571 Sheppard Apr 1980 A
4218703 Netravali et al. Aug 1980 A
4254421 Kreutel, Jr. Mar 1981 A
4273110 Groux Jun 1981 A
4357075 Hunter Nov 1982 A
4397557 Herwig et al. Aug 1983 A
4549229 Nakano et al. Oct 1985 A
4646722 Silverstein et al. Mar 1987 A
4662360 O'Hara et al. May 1987 A
4733063 Kimura et al. Mar 1988 A
4741326 Sidall et al. May 1988 A
4753530 Knight et al. Jun 1988 A
4768513 Suzuki Sep 1988 A
4800571 Konishi Jan 1989 A
4844617 Kelderman et al. Jul 1989 A
4845352 Benschop Jul 1989 A
4852955 Doyle et al. Aug 1989 A
4877033 Seitz, Jr. Oct 1989 A
4878485 Adair Nov 1989 A
4891829 Deckman et al. Jan 1990 A
4930516 Alfano et al. Jun 1990 A
4945478 Merickel et al. Jul 1990 A
4965441 Picard Oct 1990 A
4972258 Wolf et al. Nov 1990 A
4974580 Anapliotis Dec 1990 A
4979498 Oneda et al. Dec 1990 A
4997242 Amos Mar 1991 A
5003979 Merickel et al. Apr 1991 A
5011243 Doyle et al. Apr 1991 A
5022757 Modell Jun 1991 A
5028802 Webb et al. Jul 1991 A
5032720 White Jul 1991 A
5034613 Denk et al. Jul 1991 A
5036853 Jeffcoat et al. Aug 1991 A
5042494 Alfano Aug 1991 A
5048946 Sklar et al. Sep 1991 A
5054926 Dabbs et al. Oct 1991 A
5065008 Hakamata et al. Nov 1991 A
5071246 Blaha et al. Dec 1991 A
5074306 Green et al. Dec 1991 A
5083220 Hill Jan 1992 A
5091652 Mathies et al. Feb 1992 A
5101825 Gravenstein et al. Apr 1992 A
5120953 Harris Jun 1992 A
5122653 Ohki Jun 1992 A
5132526 Iwasaki Jul 1992 A
5139025 Lewis et al. Aug 1992 A
5154166 Chikama Oct 1992 A
5159919 Chikama Nov 1992 A
5161053 Dabbs Nov 1992 A
5162641 Fountain Nov 1992 A
5162941 Favro et al. Nov 1992 A
5168157 Kimura Dec 1992 A
5192980 Dixon et al. Mar 1993 A
5193525 Silverstein et al. Mar 1993 A
RE34214 Carlsson et al. Apr 1993 E
5199431 Kittrell et al. Apr 1993 A
5201318 Rava et al. Apr 1993 A
5201908 Jones Apr 1993 A
5203328 Samuels et al. Apr 1993 A
5225671 Fukuyama Jul 1993 A
5235457 Lichtman et al. Aug 1993 A
5237984 Williams, III et al. Aug 1993 A
5239178 Derndinger et al. Aug 1993 A
5248876 Kerstens et al. Sep 1993 A
5253071 MacKay Oct 1993 A
5257617 Takahashi Nov 1993 A
5260569 Kimura Nov 1993 A
5260578 Bliton et al. Nov 1993 A
5261410 Alfano et al. Nov 1993 A
5262646 Booker et al. Nov 1993 A
5274240 Mathies et al. Dec 1993 A
5284149 Dhadwal et al. Feb 1994 A
5286964 Fountain Feb 1994 A
5289274 Kondo Feb 1994 A
5294799 Aslund et al. Mar 1994 A
5296700 Kumagai Mar 1994 A
5303026 Strobl et al. Apr 1994 A
5306902 Goodman Apr 1994 A
5313567 Civanlar et al. May 1994 A
5319200 Rosenthal et al. Jun 1994 A
5321501 Swanson et al. Jun 1994 A
5324979 Rosenthal Jun 1994 A
5325846 Szabo Jul 1994 A
5329352 Jacobsen Jul 1994 A
5337734 Saab Aug 1994 A
5343038 Nishiwaki et al. Aug 1994 A
5345306 Ichimura et al. Sep 1994 A
5345941 Rava et al. Sep 1994 A
5349961 Stoddart et al. Sep 1994 A
5398685 Wilk et al. Mar 1995 A
5402768 Adair Apr 1995 A
5406939 Bala Apr 1995 A
5413092 Williams, III et al. May 1995 A
5413108 Alfano May 1995 A
5415157 Welcome May 1995 A
5418797 Bashkansky et al. May 1995 A
5419311 Yabe et al. May 1995 A
5419323 Kittrell et al. May 1995 A
5421337 Richards-Kortum et al. Jun 1995 A
5421339 Ramanujam et al. Jun 1995 A
5424543 Dombrowski et al. Jun 1995 A
5450857 Garfield et al. Sep 1995 A
5451931 Miller et al. Sep 1995 A
5458132 Yabe et al. Oct 1995 A
5458133 Yabe et al. Oct 1995 A
5467767 Alfano et al. Nov 1995 A
5469853 Law et al. Nov 1995 A
5477382 Pernick Dec 1995 A
5480775 Ito et al. Jan 1996 A
5493444 Khoury et al. Feb 1996 A
5496259 Perkins Mar 1996 A
5507295 Skidmore Apr 1996 A
5516010 O'Hara et al. May 1996 A
5519545 Kawahara May 1996 A
5529235 Bolarski et al. Jun 1996 A
5536236 Yabe et al. Jul 1996 A
5545121 Yabe et al. Aug 1996 A
5551945 Yabe et al. Sep 1996 A
5556367 Yabe et al. Sep 1996 A
5562100 Kittrell et al. Oct 1996 A
5579773 Vo-Dinh et al. Dec 1996 A
5582168 Samuels et al. Dec 1996 A
5587832 Krause Dec 1996 A
5596992 Haaland et al. Jan 1997 A
5599717 Vo-Dinh Feb 1997 A
5609560 Ichikawa et al. Mar 1997 A
5612540 Richards-Kortum et al. Mar 1997 A
5623932 Ramanujam et al. Apr 1997 A
5647368 Zeng et al. Jul 1997 A
5662588 Lida Sep 1997 A
5685822 Harhen Nov 1997 A
5690106 Bani-Hashemi et al. Nov 1997 A
5693043 Kittrell et al. Dec 1997 A
5695448 Kimura et al. Dec 1997 A
5697373 Richards-Kortum et al. Dec 1997 A
5699795 Richards-Kortum Dec 1997 A
5704892 Adair Jan 1998 A
5707343 O'Hara et al. Jan 1998 A
5713364 DeBaryshe et al. Feb 1998 A
5717209 Bigman et al. Feb 1998 A
5730701 Furukawa et al. Mar 1998 A
5733244 Yasui et al. Mar 1998 A
5735276 Lemelson et al. Apr 1998 A
5746695 Yasui et al. May 1998 A
5768333 Abdel-Mottaleb Jun 1998 A
5769792 Palcic et al. Jun 1998 A
5773835 Sinofsky Jun 1998 A
5791346 Craine et al. Aug 1998 A
5795632 Buchalter Aug 1998 A
5800350 Coppleson et al. Sep 1998 A
5807248 Mills Sep 1998 A
5813987 Modell et al. Sep 1998 A
5817015 Adair Oct 1998 A
5830146 Skladnev et al. Nov 1998 A
5833617 Hayashi Nov 1998 A
5840035 Heusmann et al. Nov 1998 A
5842995 Mahadevan-Jansen et al. Dec 1998 A
5855551 Sklandnev et al. Jan 1999 A
5860913 Yamaya et al. Jan 1999 A
5863287 Segawa Jan 1999 A
5865726 Katsurada et al. Feb 1999 A
5876329 Harhen Mar 1999 A
5920399 Sandison et al. Jul 1999 A
5921926 Rolland et al. Jul 1999 A
5929985 Sandison et al. Jul 1999 A
5931779 Arakaki et al. Aug 1999 A
5938617 Vo-Dinh Aug 1999 A
5941834 Skladnev et al. Aug 1999 A
5983125 Alfano et al. Nov 1999 A
5989184 Blair et al. Nov 1999 A
5991653 Richards-Kortum et al. Nov 1999 A
5995645 Soenksen et al. Nov 1999 A
6021344 Lui et al. Feb 2000 A
6058322 Nishikawa et al. May 2000 A
6069689 Zeng et al. May 2000 A
6091985 Alfano et al. Jul 2000 A
6095982 Richards-Kortum et al. Aug 2000 A
6096065 Crowley Aug 2000 A
6099464 Shimizu et al. Aug 2000 A
6104945 Modell et al. Aug 2000 A
6119031 Crowley Sep 2000 A
6124597 Shehada et al. Sep 2000 A
6146897 Cohenford et al. Nov 2000 A
6169817 Parker et al. Jan 2001 B1
6208887 Clarke et al. Mar 2001 B1
6241662 Richards-Kortum et al. Jun 2001 B1
6243601 Wist Jun 2001 B1
6246471 Jung et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246479 Jung et al. Jun 2001 B1
6285639 Maenza et al. Sep 2001 B1
6312385 Mo et al. Nov 2001 B1
6317617 Gilhijs et al. Nov 2001 B1
D453832 Morrell et al. Feb 2002 S
D453962 Morrell et al. Feb 2002 S
D453963 Morrell et al. Feb 2002 S
D453964 Morrell et al. Feb 2002 S
6377842 Pogue et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385484 Nordstrom et al. May 2002 B2
6411835 Modell et al. Jun 2002 B1
6411838 Nordstrom et al. Jun 2002 B1
D460821 Morrell et al. Jul 2002 S
6421553 Costa et al. Jul 2002 B1
6427082 Nordstrom et al. Jul 2002 B1
6571118 Utzinger et al. May 2003 B1
6574502 Hayashi Jun 2003 B2
20020007123 Balas et al. Jan 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (29)
Number Date Country
0 135 134 Mar 1985 EP
0 280 418 Aug 1988 EP
0 335 725 Oct 1989 EP
0 444 689 Sep 1991 EP
0 474 264 Mar 1992 EP
0 641 542 Mar 1995 EP
0 689 045 Dec 1995 EP
0 737 849 Oct 1996 EP
08-280602 Oct 1996 JP
1 223 092 Apr 1986 SU
WO 9219148 Nov 1992 WO
WO 9314688 Aug 1993 WO
WO 9426168 Nov 1994 WO
9500067 Jan 1995 WO
WO 9504385 Feb 1995 WO
WO 9705473 Feb 1997 WO
WO 9830889 Feb 1997 WO
WO 9748331 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9805253 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9824369 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9841176 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9918847 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9920313 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9920314 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9947041 Sep 1999 WO
WO 9957507 Nov 1999 WO
WO 9957529 Nov 1999 WO
WO 0015101 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0059366 Oct 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (107)
Entry
Agrawal et al. (1999), “Fluorescence Spectroscopy of the Cervix: Influence of Acetic Acid, Cervical Mucus, and Vaginal Medications,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 25:237-249.
Althof et al. (1997), “A rapid and automatic image registration algorithm with subpixel accuracy,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 16(3):308-316.
Anderson (1994), “Confocal Laser Microscopes See A Wider Field of Application”, Laser Focus World, pp. 83-86.
Aström et al. (1999), “Motion estimation in image sequences using the deformation of apparent contours,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(2):114-127.
Balakrishnama et al, “Linear Discriminant Analysis—A Brief Tutorial,” Institute for Signal and Information Processing Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 8 pages.
Balas (1997), “An Imaging Colorimeter for Noncontact Tissue Color Mapping,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 44(6):468-474.
Balas (2001), “A Novel Optical Imaging Method for the Early Detection, Quantitative Grading, and Mapping of Cancerous and Precancerous Lesions of Cervix,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 48(1):96-104.
Balas et al. (1997), “A modular diffuse reflection and fluorescence emission imaging colorimeter for the in-vivo study of parameters related with the phototoxic effect in PDT,” SPIE, 3191:50-57.
Balas et al. (1998), “In Vivo Assessment of Acetic Acid-Cervical Tissue Interaction Using Quantitative Imaging of Back-Scattered Light: Its Potential Use for the In Vivo Cervical Cancer Detection Grading and Mapping,” Part of EUROPTO Conference on Optical Biopsy, Stockholm, Sweden, SPIE, vol. 3568:31-37.
Balas et al. (1999), “In Vivo Detection and Staging of Epithelial Dysplasias and Malignancies Based on the Quantitative Assessment of Acetic Acid-Tissue Interaction Kinetics,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 53:153-157.
Bessey et al. (1949), “The Fluorometric measurement of the nucleotides of riboflavin and their concentration in tissues,” J. Biol.-Chem.; 180:755-769.
Bors et al. (1998), “Optical flow estimation and moving object segmentation based on median radial basis function network,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 7(5):693-702.
Bouthemy et al. (1999), “A unified approach to shot change detection and camera motion characterization,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 9(7):1030-1044.
Braichotte et al. (1995), “Clinical Pharmacokinetic Studies of Photofrin by Fluorescence Spectroscopy in the Oral Cavity, the Esophagus, and the Bronchi,” Cancer 75(11):2760-2778.
Brown (1990), “Chemometrics,” Anal. Chem., 62:84R-101R.
Camus et al. (1997), “Real-time quantized optical flow,” Real-Time Imaging, 3:71-86.
Caplier et al. (1998), “Real-time implementation of a MRF-based motion detection algorithm,” Real-Time Imaging, 4:41-54.
Contini et al. (1989), “Colposcopy and Computer Graphics: a New Method?” Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 160(3):535-538.
Craine et al. (1993), “Digital Imaging Colposcopy: basic concepts and applications,” Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 82(5):869-873.
Craine et al. (1998), “Digital imaging colposcopy: Corrected area measurements using shape-from-shading,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 17(6):1003-1010.
Crisp et al. (1990), “The Computerized Digital Imaging Colposcope: Future Directions,” Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 162(6):1491-1497.
Cronjé et al. (1997), “Effects of Dilute Acetic Acid on the Cervical Smear,” Acta. Cytol., 41:1091-1094.
Davidovits et al. (1971), “Scanning Laser Microscope for Biological Investigations”, Applied Optics, 10(7):1615-1619.
Dickman et al. (2001), “Identification of Cervical Neoplasia Using a Simulation of Human Vision,” Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 5(3):144-152.
Drezek et al. (1999), “Light scattering from cells: finite-difference time-domain simulations and goniometric measurements,” Applied Optics 38(16):3651-3661.
Drezek et al. (2000), “Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy of Cervical Tissue Before and After Application of Acetic Acid,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 182(5):1135-1139.
Dumontier et al. (1999), “Real-time DSP implementation for MRF-based video motion detection,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 8(10):1341-1347.
Earnshaw et al. (1996), “The Performance of Camera Translation Direction Estimators from Optical Flow: Analysis, Comparison, and Theoretical Limits,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(9):927-932.
Edebiri, A.A. (1990), “The relative significance of colposcopic discriptive appearance in the dianosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,” Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet., 33:23-29.
Eisner et al. (1987), “Use of Cross-Correlation Function to Detect Patient Motion During Spectral Imaging,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 28(1):97-101.
Ferris et al. (1998), “Colposcopy Quality Control: Establishing Colposcopy Criterion Standards for the NCI ALTS Trial Using Cervigrams,” J. Lower Genital Tract Disease, 2(4):195-203.
Fleet et al. (1995), “Recursive Filters for Optical Flow,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(1):61-67.
Gao et al. (1998), “A work minimization approach to image morphing,” The Visual Computer, 14:390-400.
Gauch (1999), “Image Segmentation and Analysis Via Multiscale Gradient Watershed Hierarchies,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 8(1):69-79.
Hall et al. (1992), “Near-Infrared Spectrophotometry: A New Dimension in Clinical Chemistry”, Clin. Chem. 38(9):1623-1631.
Haralick (1984), “Digital Step Edges from Zero Crossing of Second Directional Derivatives,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6(1):58-68.
Haris et al. (1998), “Hybrid Image Segmentation Using Watersheds and Fast Region Merging,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 7(12):1684-1699.
Helmerhorst et al. (1987), “The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in diagnosis of CIN 2/3.” Eur. J. Obstet. Gyn. Reprod. Biol., 24, 221-229.
Horn et al. (1981), “Determining Optical Flow,” Artificial Intelligence, 17(1-3):185-203.
Horn et al. (1993), “Determining Optical Flow”: a retrospective, Artificial Intelligence, 59:81-87.
Huang et al. (1979), “A fast two-dimensional median filtering algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 27(1):13-18.
Jackway (1996), “Gradient Watersheds in Morphological Scale-Space,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 5(6):913-921.
Ji et al. (2000), “Texture Analysis for Classification of Cervix Lesions,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 19(11):1144-1149.
Kierkegaard et al. (1995), “Association between Colposcopic Findings and Histology in Cervical Lesions: The Significance of the Size of the Lesion” Gynecologic Oncology, 57:66-71.
Koester (1980), “Scanning Mirror Microscope with Optical Sectioning Characteristics: Applications in Ophthalmology”, Applied Optics, 19(11):1749-1757.
Koester, “Comparison of Optical Sectioning Methods: The Scanning Slit Confocal Microscope”, Confocal Microscope Handbook, pp. 189-194.
Kumar et al. (1996), “Optical Flow: A Curve Evolution Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 5(4):598-610.
Linde et al. (1980), An algorithm for vector quantizer design,: IEEE Transactions on Communications, 28(1):84-95.
MacAulay et al. (2002), “Variation of fluorescence spectroscopy during the menstrual cycle,” Optics Express, 10(12):493-504.
MacLean A.B. (1999), “What is Acetowhite Epithelium,” Abstract Book; 10th World Congress of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy, Nov. 7-11, Buenos Aires, Argentina 41.
Marzetta et al. (1999), “A surprising radon transform result and its application to motion detection,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 8(8):1039-1049.
Miike et al. (1999), “Motion enhancement for preprocessing of optical flow and scientific visualization,” Pattern Recognition Letters, 20:451-461.
Mikhail et al. (1995), “Computerized colposcopy and conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pregnancy,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 74:376-378.
Milanfar (1999), “Two-dimensional matched filtering for motion estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 8(3):438-444.
Mitchell et al. (1998), “Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis,” Obstet. Gynecol., 91(4):626-631.
Mycek et al. (1998), “Colonic polyp differentiation using time-resolved autofluorescence spectroscopy,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 48(4):390-394.
Nanda et al. (2000), “Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review,” Ann Intern Med., 132(10):810-819.
Nesi et al. (1998), “RETIMAC REalTIme Motion Analysis Chip,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, 45(3):361-375.
Noumeir et al. (1996), “Detection of Motion During Tomographic Acquisition by an Optical Flow Algorithm,” Computers and Biomedical Research, 29(1):1-15.
O'Sullivan et al. (1994), “Interobserver variation in the diagnosis and grading of dyskaryosis in cervical smears: specialist cytopathologists compared with non-specialists,” J. Clin. Pathol., 47(6):515-518.
Ogura et al. (1995), “A cost effective motion estimation processor LSI using a simple and efficient algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 41(3):690-698.
Okatani et al. (1997), “Shape reconstruction from an endoscope image by shape from shading technique for a point light source at the projection center,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 66(2):119-131.
Pan et al. (1998), “Correlation-feedback Technique in Optical Flow Determination,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 7(7):1061-1067.
Perona et al. (1990), “Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12(7):629-639.
Pogue et al. (2001), “Analysis of Acetic Acid-Induced Whitening of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, 6(4):397-403.
Radjadhyaksha et al. (2000), “Confocal microscopy of excised human skin using acetic acid and crossed polarization: rapid detection on non-melanoma skin cancers,” Proceedings of SPIE, 3907:84-88.
Rakshit et al. (1997), “Computation of Optical Flow Using Basis Functions,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6(9):1246-1254.
Ramanujam et al. (1994) “In vivo diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using 337-nm-exited laser-induced fluorescence”, Pro. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91:10193-10197.
Ramanujam et al. (1994), “Fluorescence Spectroscopy; A Diagnostic Tool for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN),” Gynecologic Oncology, 52:31-38.
Reid et al. (1985), “Genital warts and cervical cancer. VII. An improved colposcopic index for differentiating benign papillomaviral infections from high-grade CIN,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 153(6):611-618.
Richards-Kortum et al. (1994), “Description and Performance of a Fiber-optic Confocal Fluorescence Spectrometer,” Applied Spectroscopy, 48(3):350-355.
Romano et al. (1997), “Spectroscopic study of human leukocytes,” Physica Medica, 13:291-295.
Ruprecht et al. (1995), “Image warping with scattered data interpolation methods,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 37-43.
Sakuma (1985), “Quantitative Analysis of the Whiteness of the Atypical Cervical Transformation Zone”, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 30(10):773-776.
Schmid (1999), “Lesion Detection in Dermatoscopic Images Using Anisotropic Diffusion and Morphological Flooding,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP-99), 3:449-453.
Schmid (1999), “Segmentation and Symmetry Measure for Image Analysis: Application to Digital Dermatoscopy,” Ph.D. Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS).
Schmid (1999), “Segmentation of Digitized Dermatoscopic Images by 2D Color Clustering,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 18(2):164-171.
Schmitt et al. (1994), “Confocal Microscopy in Turbid Media”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 11(8):2225-2235.
Schmitt et al. (1994), “Interferometric Versus Confocal Techniques for Imaging Microstructures in Turbid Biological Media”, Proc. SPIE, 2135:1-12.
Schomacker et al. (1992), “Ultraviolet Laser-Induced Fluorescence of Colonic Polyps,” Gastroenterology, 102:1155-1160.
Schomacker et al. (1992), “Ultraviolet Laser-Induced Fluorescence of Colonic Tissue; Basic Biology and Diagnostic Potential”, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 12:63-78.
Schwartz (1993), “Real-time laser-scanning Confocal ratio imaging”, American Laboratory, pp. 53-62.
Shafarenko et al. (1997), “Automatic Watershed Segmentation of Randomly Textured Color Images,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6(11):1530-1544.
Shafi et al. (1995), “Modern image capture and data collection technology,” Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., 38(3):640-643.
Sheppard et al. (1978), “Depth of Field in the Scanning Microscope”, Optics Letters, 3(3):115-117.
Szarewski et al., (1996), “Effect of smoking cessation on cervical lesions size,” Lancet, 347:941-943.
Szeliski et al. (1997), “Spline-based image registration,” International Journal of Computer Vision, 22(3):199-218.
Tadrous (2000), “Methods for Imaging the Structure and Function of Living Tissues and Cells: 2. Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging,” Journal of Pathology, 19(3):229-234.
Thirion et al. (1999), “Deformation analysis to detect and quantify active lesions in three-dimensional medical image sequences,” IEEE Transactions on Medial Imaging, 18(5):429-441.
Toglia et al. (1997), “Evaluation of colposcopic skills in an obstetrics and gynecology residency training program,” J. Lower Gen. Tract. Dis., 1(1):5-8.
Treameau et al. (1997), “A Region Growing and Merging Algorithm to Color Segmentation,” Pattern Recognition, 30(7):1191-1203.
Van den Elsen et al. (1995), “Automatic registration of ct and mr brain images using correlation of geometrical features,” IEEE Transactions on medical imaging, 14(2):384-396.
Vernon (1999), “Computation of Instantaneous Optical Flow Using the Phase of Fourier Components,” Image and Vision Computing, 17:189-199.
Vincent et al. (1991), “Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An Efficient Algorithm Based on Immersion Simulations,” IEEE Transactions on Patterns Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(6):583-598.
Vincent et al. (1993), “Morphological grayscale reconstruction in image analysis: Applications and efficient algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2(2):176-201.
Wang et al. (1999), “Fast algorithms for the estimation of motion vectors,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 8(3):435-438.
Weng et al. (1997), “Three-Dimensional Surface Reconstruction Using Optical Flow for Medical Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 16(5):630-641.
Wilson, “The Role of the Pinhold in Confocal Imaging Systems”, Confocal Microscopy Handbook, Chapter 11, 113-126.
Woldberg et al. (1998) “Image morphing: a survey,” The Visual Computer, 14:360-372.
You et al. (1996), “Behavioral analysis of anisotropic diffusion in image processing,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 5(11):1539-1553.
Zahm et al. (1998), “Colposcopic appearance of cervical intraephithelial neoplasia is age dependent,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 179(5):1298-1304.
Zeger et al. (1992), “Globally optimal vector quantizer design by stochastic relaxation,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 40(2):310-322.
Zeng et al. (1993), “A computerized autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroanalyser system for in vivo skin studies,” Phys. Med. Biol., 38:231-240.
Zeng et al. (1997), “Optimization of fast block motion estimation algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 7(6):833-844.
Zhang et al. (1999), “Shape from shading: a survey,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(8):690-706.
Zheng et al. (1991), “Estimation of illumination direction, albedo, and shape from shading,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(7):680-702.
Zhengfeng et al. (1998), “Identification of Colonic Dysplasia and Neoplasia by Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy and Pattern Recognition Techniques,” Applied Spectroscopy, 52(6):833-839.