This invention relates generally to diagnosis of disease. More particularly, the invention relates to in vivo diagnosis by optical methods.
Colonic polyps appear as two major types, neoplastic and non-neoplastic. Non-neoplastic polyps are benign with no direct malignant potential and do not necessarily need to be resected. Hyperplastic polyps, juvenile polyps, mucosal prolapse and normal mucosal polyps are examples of non-neoplastic polyps. Conversely, neoplastic polyps are pre-malignant, a condition requiring resection and further surveillance. Examples of premalignant neoplastic polyps are tubular adenoma, villous adenoma and tubulovillous adenoma.
Conventional laser-induced fluorescence emission and reflectance spectroscopy can distinguish between neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissue with accuracies approaching about 85%. However, typically these methods require that the full spectrum be measured with algorithms dependent on many emission wavelengths.
The invention provides in vivo diagnostic methods based upon the normalized intensity of light emitted from tissue. In particular, it is an observation of the invention that relevant diagnostic information is provided by comparing the intensities of light emitted from a tissue at two different wavelengths, both normalized over the intensity of light emitted from the same tissue at about 431 nm.
Thus, according to the invention, a comparison of the intensities of two different wavelengths normalized using the intensity at about 431 nm provides diagnostic insight. Preferred methods of the invention comprise obtaining a fluorescent emission having a first intensity at a first wavelength and a second intensity at a wavelength; normalizing the first and second intensities with respect to an intensity at a wavelength of about 431 nm to produce first and second normalized intensities; and determining a state of health of the tissue based upon a comparison of the first and second normalized intensities.
In one embodiment, methods of the invention comprise determining the state of health of the tissue using a classifier function in which the first and second normalized intensities are inputs. In one embodiment, the classifier function is a discrimination function, preferably a linear discrimination function. In other embodiments, the discrimination function is a non-linear discrimination function.
The invention can be applied to analyze a broad range of tissues. Preferably, the tissue to be analyzed is a tissue comprising epithelial cells. In one embodiment, the tissue is selected from the group consisting of cervical tissue, colonic tissue, esophogeal tissue, bladder tissue, and bronchial tissue.
Classifying or comparing normalized intensities into one or more groups may be performed by any acceptable means. There are numerous acceptable approaches to such classifications. For example, one general method of grouping the two normalized intensities is a Bayesian-based classifier using Mahalanobis distances. The Mahalanobis distance is well-known in statistical analysis, and is used to measure a distance between data in a multidimensional space based on characteristics that represent a degree of relationship among the data. Bayesian probabilities have been known in statistical analysis for many years. Specific Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier can be selected from linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, and regularized discriminant analysis. As those familiar with statistical analysis will recognize, linear discrimination analysis and quadratic discriminant analysis are methods that are computationallv efficient. Regularized discriminant analysis uses a biasing method based on two parameters to estimate class covariance matrices.
Other ways of comparing the normalized intensities include a binary tree classifier, and an unsupervised learning cluster classifier. Unsupervised learning is characterized by the absence of explicit examples showing what an input/output relation should be. Examples of an unsupervised learning cluster classifier include hierarchical clustering analysis, principal component analysis, fuzzy c-means analysis, and fuzzy k-means analysis. Each of the forgoing analytical techniques is well known in the statistical analysis literature. For example, the fuzzy c-means algorithm divides a data set having an integer number n data points into an integer number c fuzzy clusters, where n>c, while determining a location for each cluster in a multi-dimensional space.
In another aspect, the invention features systems for determining the state of health of a tissue. Systems of the invention comprise an illumination source for illuminating a tissue; a detector for receiving from the tissue light comprising a first intensity at a first wavelength and a second intensity at a second wavelength; a computational module for normalizing the first and second intensities with respect to received light having an intensity at a wavelength of about 431 nm to produce first and second normalized intensities; and an analysis module for determining a state of health of the tissue based upon a comparison of the first and second normalized intensities.
In a preferred embodiment, a system of the invention comprises an optical fiber as the illumination source. The detector may receive light from the tissue by way of a plurality of optical fibers. In a preferred embodiment, at least one of the optical fibers of the system is placed directly in contact with tissue. Preferably, the light received from the tissue is fluorescent light. The analysis module of a system of the invention may comprise a Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier function. The Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier may be selected from the group consisting of linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, and regularized discriminant analysis. The analysis module may also comprise a binary tree classifier function or an unsupervised learning cluster classifier. In some embodiments, the unsupervised learning cluster classifier is selected from the group consisting of hierarchical clustering analysis, principal component analysis, fuzzy c-means analysis, and fuzzy k-means analysis.
Systems and methods of the invention are useful in examining a tissue comprising epithelial cells. A method of the invention comprises laser-induced fluorescence using light around 337 nm and a threshold classification model that depends on two fluorescence intensity ratios normalized by the intensity of fluorescence at about 431 nm.
The invention enables determining whether a polyp is neoplastic. Systems and methods of the invention enable such determination at the time of endoscopy particularly for diminutive polyps. In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides for identification of polyps (or other features) under about 10 mm in size. In a further preferred embodiment, the invention provides for identification of polyps (or other features) under about 10 mm in size in real time.
The combination of a new design of a fiberoptic probe for making measurements, an analytic method based on a small number of data points, and a simple method of obtaining a normalization factor for the data used provides enhanced diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps.
The invention provides methods that reliably distinguish between neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissue at the time of endoscopy, colonoscopy, colposcopy, or other similar examinations. As a result, patients with non-neoplastic lesions are not subjected to the risk, discomfort and expense of biopsies or excisions. Patients with neoplastic lesions can be identified immediately and treated.
The foregoing and other objects, aspects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following description and from the claims.
The objects and features of the invention can be better understood with reference to the drawings described below. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the drawings, like numerals are used to indicate like parts throughout the various views.
In one aspect, the invention utilizes the intensity of fluorescence observed at an isosbestic-like point as a point for normalization. An isosbestic point is a point in wavelength space (or its equivalent) at which a multi-component system exhibits a constant absorbance independent of the relative proportions of the components. Following normalization to peak fluorescence intensity, polyp fluorescence spectra exhibits nearly constant fluorescence intensities at 431 nm. A preferred isosbestic-like point for use in methods of the invention is 431 nm.
According to the invention, normalizing polyp fluorescence spectra to an isosbestic point is nearly equivalent to normalizing to their peak intensities. Generally, the invention involves illuminating a specimen and observing the intensity of responsive light at each of first and second wavelengths. These intensities are normalized with respect to the intensity of light at an isosbestic point. Normalized intensities are typically obtained by dividing an intensity of responsive light at a wavelength by the intensity of light at the isosbestic wavelength. In a preferred embodiment, the fluorescence isosbestic point occurs at a wavelength of about 431 nm.
The first and second wavelengths may be conveniently selected in accordance with a discrimination function analysis, which is described below in greater detail. The normalized responses are used at input values for the discrimination function analysis. The output of the discrimination function analysis is an indication that the specimen examined is healthy or is diseased.
The discrimination analysis can be linear or nonlinear. In general terms, the discrimination function is a mathematical relationship that is constructed in at least two-dimensional space. The mathematical relationship is constructed in relation to groupings of observations corresponding to one or more known medical conditions as compared to observations corresponding to another known condition (e.g., healthy). The discrimination function used in methods of the invention is a mathematical representation of one or more boundaries that separate observations obtained from the sample being interrogated from those corresponding to one or more groups associated with a known condition. As is appreciated by the skilled artisan, numerous discrimination techniques are available for application of the invention. Numerous such techniques are discussed below.
In one embodiment, the invention is practiced by illuminating tissue with 337 nm excitation light delivered via a single optical fiber. Light that is remitted is collected with a plurality of optical fibers surrounding the illumination fiber. In one embodiment, signals from the individual collection fibers can be averaged into a single spectrum thereby increasing sensitivity. In an alternative embodiment, the signals from the individual collection fibers can be analyzed as discrete signals, for example, by comparing the different signal to determine an extent of tissue that provides a particular response.
An exemplary apparatus 100 used in this embodiment of the invention is shown in
This invention, in one embodiment, relates to an optical probe and methods for identifying neoplastic tissues of the colon during endoscopy or colonoscopy and of the cervix of the uterus during colposcopy as well as cancerous and/or pre-cancerous lesions of other organs, such as the esophagus, the urinary bladder, the oral cavity, and the bronchotracheal tree. Systems and methods of the invention can be usefully employed in examining a tissue comprising epithelial cells. A probe according to the invention comprises a plurality of collection fibers surrounding a single illumination fiber. Preferably, the plurality of collection fibers is six fibers. In a preferred embodiment, at least one of the optical fibers of the probe is placed directly in contact with tissue. A method of the invention comprises laser induced fluorescence using 337 mm excitation and a threshold classification model that depends on two fluorescence intensity ratios normalized by the intensity of fluorescence at about 431 nm. In a preferred embodiment, the intensity at about 403 nm is divided by the intensity at about 431 nm and the intensity at about 414 nm is divided by the intensity at 431 nm.
The invention enables determining whether a polyp is neoplastic. Systems and methods of the invention enable such determination at the time of endoscopy particularly for diminutive polyps. In an exemplary embodiment, fluorescent intensity at frequencies other than about 403 nm and about 414 nm are observed, and are normalized by dividing by the intensity of fluorescence observed at about 431 nm.
In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides for identification of polyps (or other features) under about 10 mm in size. In a further preferred embodiment, the invention provides for identification of polyps (or other features) under about 10 mm in size in real time.
Referring to
Changes in optical properties of collagen and blood are the predominant factors in diagnostic differentiation among normal tissue, non-neoplastic polyps, and neoplastic polyps. An algorithm that treats collagen fluorescence, having a peak at about 403 nm in the system of the invention, and hemoglobin absorption, having a peak at about 414 nm for oxyhemoglobin, is sensitive to these changes.
Collagen and blood reside underneath the superficial cellular layer. A fiberoptic geometry designed to probe deeper into tissue but not too deep is more sensitive to changes in collagen and blood and hence in differentiating between types of polyps. The six-around-one fiberoptic probe used according to principles of the invention probes deeper into tissue than does a single fiber system.
Interpatient variability in the intensity of fluorescent response is typically large and affects the diagnostic accuracy of techniques based on absolute fluorescence intensities. Historically, effective diagnostic algorithms have used some form of normalization to reduce interpatient variability. One common approach that has been used is to preprocess the data by normalizing the area under each fluorescence spectrum to unity. However, this approach requires that the entire fluorescence spectrum be measured to calculate the area to be used for the normalization factor. The necessity to record an entire spectral response simply to be able to obtain normalization data is redundant and inefficient. The inefficiency is particularly acute if only the emissions at 1 or 2 wavelengths are to be analyzed.
According to the invention, a quasi-isosbestic point exists at about 431 nm between the fluorescence spectra of normal tissue, hyperplastic polyps and adenomatous polyps. The quasi-isosbestic point is used as a normalization factor that provides effective normalization while requiring fluorescence to be measured at only one addition emission wavelength. For other types of pre-cancerous and/or cancerous polyps, other chemical substances are involved in the progress of the disease. These chemical substances provide characteristic signals that can occur at wavelengths other than at about 403 nm and about 414 nm.
The combination of a new design of a fiberoptic probe for making measurements, an analytic method based on a small number of data points, and a simple method of obtaining a normalization factor for the data used provides enhanced diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps. The efficacy of the new system and method is demonstrated in a single-center prospective clinical trial. A higher fraction of polyps were correctly classified with this technique, (e.g., accuracy=86%) when compared to other approaches. The accuracy of the method using two emission wavelengths is better than that obtained in retrospective clinical trials requiring many more wavelengths. A retrospective trial is one in which one determines the sensitivity of an algorithm that was retrospectively optimized with data in hand. A prospective trial is one that uses a retrospectively trained algorithm in a prospective analysis of data collected after the algorithm is defined and tested.
Analysis Method
Sensitivity Analysis
The apparatus of
Various linear or non-linear discriminant functions can be devised using the complex relationship between tissue fluorescence measured on the surface and the distribution of different fluorophores that exist in different tissue layers. The analysis is further complicated by primary absorption of the excitation light and secondary absorption of the emitted light at different wavelengths by the same fluorophores and other chromophores as the light used for excitation and the emitted light propagate through scattering media such as tissue. Diagnostic systems and methods of the invention will operate according to a non-linear discriminant when an excess and/or a deficit of one or more of such substances is indicative of a condition of health.
Diagnostic systems and methods of the invention will operate according to a non-linear discriminant based on other factors as well. For example, in the field of colposcopy, nonlinear discriminants can vary with other factors such as the age or race of the patient or whether the patient is pre-, peri- or post-menopausal.
Potential Cost Savings
The ability to identify and distinguish benign and malignant polyps in situ could result in substantial cost savings. In this particular example, 39 of 94 polyps would have been spared from being resected and biopsied, representing a 41% savings in surgical and pathology charges. However, at present there is a false negative rate of 9.6%. The long term outcome of not resecting these polyps will need to be determined. In comparison, other techniques spared 14% of the polyps from being biopsied and had a false negative rate of 0.9%. If polyps greater than 5 mm in the latter study are excluded from this analysis then 27% of the polyps would not have been biopsied and the technique would have a 3.2% false negative rate.
Application to Other Tissues
The systems and methods of the invention have been described with regard to observations on colonic tissue. The invention, involving a new probe design and analytical method, can enhance the accuracy for identifying neoplasia in other tissues such as the cervix of the uterus, the esophagus, the urinary bladder, the oral cavity, and the bronchotracheal tree.
Equivalents
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/192,836, filed Jul. 10, 2002, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,768,918 on Jul. 27, 2004 which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
This invention was made with government support under a Small Business Innovation Research Grant (Contract # 1R43CA75773-01) awarded by the Department of Health and Human Services. The government may have certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3013467 | Minsky | Dec 1961 | A |
3632865 | Haskell et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3809072 | Ersek et al. | May 1974 | A |
3890462 | Limb et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3963019 | Quandt et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
D242393 | Bauman | Nov 1976 | S |
D242396 | Bauman | Nov 1976 | S |
D242397 | Bauman | Nov 1976 | S |
D242398 | Bauman | Nov 1976 | S |
4017192 | Rosenthal et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4071020 | Puglise et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4198571 | Sheppard | Apr 1980 | A |
4218703 | Netravali et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4254421 | Kreutel, Jr. | Mar 1981 | A |
4273110 | Groux | Jun 1981 | A |
4349510 | Kolehmainen et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4357075 | Hunter | Nov 1982 | A |
4396579 | Schroeder et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4397557 | Herwig et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4515165 | Carroll | May 1985 | A |
4549229 | Nakano et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4558462 | Horiba et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4641352 | Fenster et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4646722 | Silverstein et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4662360 | O'Hara et al. | May 1987 | A |
4733063 | Kimura et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4741326 | Sidall et al. | May 1988 | A |
4753530 | Knight et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4755055 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4768513 | Suzuki | Sep 1988 | A |
4800571 | Konishi | Jan 1989 | A |
4803049 | Hirschfeld et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4844617 | Kelderman et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4845352 | Benschop | Jul 1989 | A |
4852955 | Doyle et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4877033 | Seitz, Jr. | Oct 1989 | A |
4878485 | Adair | Nov 1989 | A |
4891829 | Deckman et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4930516 | Alfano et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4945478 | Merickel et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4965441 | Picard | Oct 1990 | A |
4972258 | Wolf et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4974580 | Anapliotis | Dec 1990 | A |
4979498 | Oneda et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4997242 | Amos | Mar 1991 | A |
5003979 | Merickel et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011243 | Doyle et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5022757 | Modell | Jun 1991 | A |
5028802 | Webb et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5032720 | White | Jul 1991 | A |
5034613 | Denk et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036853 | Jeffcoat et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5042494 | Alfano | Aug 1991 | A |
5048946 | Sklar et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5054926 | Dabbs et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5065008 | Hakamata et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5071246 | Blaha et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5074306 | Green et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5083220 | Hill | Jan 1992 | A |
5091652 | Mathies et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5101825 | Gravenstein et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5120953 | Harris | Jun 1992 | A |
5122653 | Ohki | Jun 1992 | A |
5131398 | Alfano et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5132526 | Iwasaki | Jul 1992 | A |
5139025 | Lewis et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5154166 | Chikama | Oct 1992 | A |
5159919 | Chikama | Nov 1992 | A |
5161053 | Dabbs | Nov 1992 | A |
5162641 | Fountain | Nov 1992 | A |
5162941 | Favro et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5168157 | Kimura | Dec 1992 | A |
5192980 | Dixon et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5193525 | Silverstein et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
RE34214 | Carlsson et al. | Apr 1993 | E |
5199431 | Kittrell et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5201318 | Rava et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5201908 | Jones | Apr 1993 | A |
5203328 | Samuels et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5205291 | Potter | Apr 1993 | A |
5225671 | Fukuyama | Jul 1993 | A |
5235457 | Lichtman et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237984 | Williams, III et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239178 | Derndinger et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5248876 | Kerstens et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253071 | MacKay | Oct 1993 | A |
5257617 | Takahashi | Nov 1993 | A |
5260569 | Kimura | Nov 1993 | A |
5260578 | Bliton et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5261410 | Alfano et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5262646 | Booker et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267179 | Butler et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5274240 | Mathies et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5284149 | Dhadwal et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5286964 | Fountain | Feb 1994 | A |
5289274 | Kondo | Feb 1994 | A |
5294799 | Aslund et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5296700 | Kumagai | Mar 1994 | A |
5303026 | Strobl et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306902 | Goodman | Apr 1994 | A |
5313567 | Civanlar et al. | May 1994 | A |
5319200 | Rosenthal et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5321501 | Swanson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324979 | Rosenthal | Jun 1994 | A |
5325846 | Szabo | Jul 1994 | A |
5329352 | Jacobsen | Jul 1994 | A |
5337734 | Saab | Aug 1994 | A |
5343038 | Nishiwaki et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345306 | Ichimura et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5345941 | Rava et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349961 | Stoddart et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5383874 | Jackson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5398685 | Wilk et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402768 | Adair | Apr 1995 | A |
5406939 | Bala | Apr 1995 | A |
5412563 | Cline et al. | May 1995 | A |
5413092 | Williams, III et al. | May 1995 | A |
5413108 | Alfano | May 1995 | A |
5415157 | Welcome | May 1995 | A |
5418797 | Bashkansky et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419311 | Yabe et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419323 | Kittrell et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421337 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5421339 | Ramanujam et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5424543 | Dombrowski et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5450857 | Garfield et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5451931 | Miller et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452723 | Wu et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5458132 | Yabe et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458133 | Yabe et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467767 | Alfano et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469853 | Law et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477382 | Pernick | Dec 1995 | A |
5480775 | Ito et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5493444 | Khoury et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496259 | Perkins | Mar 1996 | A |
5507295 | Skidmore | Apr 1996 | A |
5516010 | O'Hara et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519545 | Kawahara | May 1996 | A |
5529235 | Bolarski et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5536236 | Yabe et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545121 | Yabe et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551945 | Yabe et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556367 | Yabe et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562100 | Kittrell et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5579773 | Vo-Dinh et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5582168 | Samuels et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587832 | Krause | Dec 1996 | A |
5596992 | Haaland et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5599717 | Vo-Dinh | Feb 1997 | A |
5609560 | Ichikawa et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612540 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623932 | Ramanujam et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5643175 | Adair | Jul 1997 | A |
5647368 | Zeng et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659384 | Ina | Aug 1997 | A |
5662588 | Lida | Sep 1997 | A |
5685822 | Harhen | Nov 1997 | A |
5690106 | Bani-Hashemi et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693043 | Kittrell et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695448 | Kimura et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697373 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699795 | Richards-Kortum | Dec 1997 | A |
5704892 | Adair | Jan 1998 | A |
5707343 | O'Hara et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713364 | DeBaryshe et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717209 | Bigman et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720293 | Quinn et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5730701 | Furukawa et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733244 | Yasui et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735276 | Lemelson | Apr 1998 | A |
5746695 | Yasui et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768333 | Abdel-Mottaleb | Jun 1998 | A |
5769792 | Palcic et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773835 | Sinofsky et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784162 | Cabib et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791346 | Craine et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795632 | Buchalter | Aug 1998 | A |
5800350 | Coppleson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807248 | Mills | Sep 1998 | A |
5813987 | Modell et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817015 | Adair | Oct 1998 | A |
5830146 | Skladnev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833617 | Hayashi | Nov 1998 | A |
5838435 | Sandison | Nov 1998 | A |
5840035 | Heusmann et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842995 | Mahadevan-Jansen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855551 | Sklandnev et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860913 | Yamaya et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863287 | Segawa | Jan 1999 | A |
5865726 | Katsurada et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871439 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876329 | Harhen | Mar 1999 | A |
5894340 | Loree et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902246 | McHenry et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912257 | Prasad et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920399 | Sandison et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921926 | Rolland et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929985 | Sandison et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931779 | Arakaki et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938617 | Vo-Dinh | Aug 1999 | A |
5941834 | Skladnev et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5983125 | Alfano et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987343 | Kinast | Nov 1999 | A |
5989184 | Blair et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991653 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995645 | Soenksen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999844 | Gombrich et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011596 | Burl et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021344 | Lui et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026319 | Hayashi | Feb 2000 | A |
6058322 | Nishikawa et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067371 | Gouge et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069689 | Zeng et al. | May 2000 | A |
6083487 | Biel | Jul 2000 | A |
6091985 | Alfano et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6095982 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6096065 | Crowley | Aug 2000 | A |
6099464 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104945 | Modell et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119031 | Crowley | Sep 2000 | A |
6123454 | Canfield et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124597 | Shehada et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6135965 | Tumor et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146897 | Cohenford et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6166079 | Follen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169817 | Parker et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187289 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208887 | Clarke et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210331 | Raz | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224256 | Bala | May 2001 | B1 |
6241662 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243601 | Wist | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246471 | Jung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246479 | Jung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258576 | Richars-Kortum et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277067 | Blair | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285639 | Maenza et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312385 | Mo et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317617 | Gilhuijs et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332092 | Deckert et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
D453832 | Morrell et al. | Feb 2002 | S |
D453962 | Morrell et al. | Feb 2002 | S |
D453963 | Morrell et al. | Feb 2002 | S |
D453964 | Morrell et al. | Feb 2002 | S |
6370422 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373998 | Thirion et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6377842 | Pogue et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385484 | Nordstrom et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6390671 | Tseng | May 2002 | B1 |
6405070 | Banerjee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411835 | Modell et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411838 | Nordstrom et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
D460821 | Morrell et al. | Jul 2002 | S |
6421553 | Costa et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424852 | Zavislan | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427082 | Nordstrom et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6466687 | Uppaluri et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487440 | Deckert et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6497659 | Rafert | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6571118 | Utzinger et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574502 | Hayashi | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6593101 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6593102 | Zahniser | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6639674 | Sokolov et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6697666 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6760613 | Nordstrom et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766184 | Utzinger et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768918 | Zelenchuk | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6818903 | Schomacker et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826422 | Modell et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
D500134 | Banks et al. | Dec 2004 | S |
6839661 | Costa et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847490 | Nordstrom et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6902935 | Kaufman et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
D507349 | Banks et al. | Jul 2005 | S |
6933154 | Schomacker et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7015310 | Remington et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
20010041843 | Modell et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020007122 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007123 | Balas et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020107668 | Costa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127735 | Kaufman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133073 | Nordstrom et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020177777 | Nordstrom et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183626 | Nordstrom et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197728 | Kaufman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030095721 | Clume et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114762 | Balas | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030144585 | Kaufman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163049 | Balas | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030207250 | Kaufman et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040007674 | Schomacker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010187 | Schomacker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010195 | Zelenchuk | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010375 | Schomacker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023406 | Shomacker et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040206882 | Banks et al | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040206913 | Costa et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040206914 | Schomacker et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207625 | Griffin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040208385 | Jiang | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040208390 | Jiang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040209237 | Flewelling et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050054936 | Balas | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050090751 | Balas | Apr 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 135 134 | Mar 1985 | EP |
0 280 418 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0 335 725 | Oct 1989 | EP |
0 444 689 | Sep 1991 | EP |
0 474 264 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0 641 542 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0 689 045 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0 737 849 | Oct 1996 | EP |
1 223 092 | Apr 1986 | SU |
WO 9219148 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 9314688 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO 9426168 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9500067 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9504385 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9705473 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 9830889 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 9748331 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9805253 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9824369 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9841176 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9918847 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9920313 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9920314 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9947041 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9957507 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 9957529 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0015101 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0059366 | Oct 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050043635 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10192836 | Jul 2002 | US |
Child | 10894356 | US |