Fluorescent fiberoptic probe for tissue health discrimination

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7310547
  • Patent Number
    7,310,547
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 19, 2004
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 18, 2007
    16 years ago
Abstract
A system and method for the in situ discrimination of healthy and diseased tissue. A fiberoptic based probe is employed to direct ultraviolet illumination onto a tissue specimen and to collect the fluorescent response radiation. The response radiation is observed at three selected wavelengths, one of which corresponds to an isosbestic point. In one example, the isosbestic point occurs at about 431 nm. The intensities of the observed signals are normalized using the 431 nm intensity. A score is determined using the ratios in a discriminant analysis. The tissue under examination is resected or not, based on the diagnosis of disease or health, according to the outcome of the discriminant analysis.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to diagnosis of disease. More particularly, the invention relates to in vivo diagnosis by optical methods.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Colonic polyps appear as two major types, neoplastic and non-neoplastic. Non-neoplastic polyps are benign with no direct malignant potential and do not necessarily need to be resected. Hyperplastic polyps, juvenile polyps, mucosal prolapse and normal mucosal polyps are examples of non-neoplastic polyps. Conversely, neoplastic polyps are pre-malignant, a condition requiring resection and further surveillance. Examples of premalignant neoplastic polyps are tubular adenoma, villous adenoma and tubulovillous adenoma.


Conventional laser-induced fluorescence emission and reflectance spectroscopy can distinguish between neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissue with accuracies approaching about 85%. However, typically these methods require that the full spectrum be measured with algorithms dependent on many emission wavelengths.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides in vivo diagnostic methods based upon the normalized intensity of light emitted from tissue. In particular, it is an observation of the invention that relevant diagnostic information is provided by comparing the intensities of light emitted from a tissue at two different wavelengths, both normalized over the intensity of light emitted from the same tissue at about 431 nm.


Thus, according to the invention, a comparison of the intensities of two different wavelengths normalized using the intensity at about 431 nm provides diagnostic insight. Preferred methods of the invention comprise obtaining a fluorescent emission having a first intensity at a first wavelength and a second intensity at a wavelength; normalizing the first and second intensities with respect to an intensity at a wavelength of about 431 nm to produce first and second normalized intensities; and determining a state of health of the tissue based upon a comparison of the first and second normalized intensities.


In one embodiment, methods of the invention comprise determining the state of health of the tissue using a classifier function in which the first and second normalized intensities are inputs. In one embodiment, the classifier function is a discrimination function, preferably a linear discrimination function. In other embodiments, the discrimination function is a non-linear discrimination function.


The invention can be applied to analyze a broad range of tissues. Preferably, the tissue to be analyzed is a tissue comprising epithelial cells. In one embodiment, the tissue is selected from the group consisting of cervical tissue, colonic tissue, esophogeal tissue, bladder tissue, and bronchial tissue.


Classifying or comparing normalized intensities into one or more groups may be performed by any acceptable means. There are numerous acceptable approaches to such classifications. For example, one general method of grouping the two normalized intensities is a Bayesian-based classifier using Mahalanobis distances. The Mahalanobis distance is well-known in statistical analysis, and is used to measure a distance between data in a multidimensional space based on characteristics that represent a degree of relationship among the data. Bayesian probabilities have been known in statistical analysis for many years. Specific Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier can be selected from linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, and regularized discriminant analysis. As those familiar with statistical analysis will recognize, linear discrimination analysis and quadratic discriminant analysis are methods that are computationallv efficient. Regularized discriminant analysis uses a biasing method based on two parameters to estimate class covariance matrices.


Other ways of comparing the normalized intensities include a binary tree classifier, and an unsupervised learning cluster classifier. Unsupervised learning is characterized by the absence of explicit examples showing what an input/output relation should be. Examples of an unsupervised learning cluster classifier include hierarchical clustering analysis, principal component analysis, fuzzy c-means analysis, and fuzzy k-means analysis. Each of the forgoing analytical techniques is well known in the statistical analysis literature. For example, the fuzzy c-means algorithm divides a data set having an integer number n data points into an integer number c fuzzy clusters, where n>c, while determining a location for each cluster in a multi-dimensional space.


In another aspect, the invention features systems for determining the state of health of a tissue. Systems of the invention comprise an illumination source for illuminating a tissue; a detector for receiving from the tissue light comprising a first intensity at a first wavelength and a second intensity at a second wavelength; a computational module for normalizing the first and second intensities with respect to received light having an intensity at a wavelength of about 431 nm to produce first and second normalized intensities; and an analysis module for determining a state of health of the tissue based upon a comparison of the first and second normalized intensities.


In a preferred embodiment, a system of the invention comprises an optical fiber as the illumination source. The detector may receive light from the tissue by way of a plurality of optical fibers. In a preferred embodiment, at least one of the optical fibers of the system is placed directly in contact with tissue. Preferably, the light received from the tissue is fluorescent light. The analysis module of a system of the invention may comprise a Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier function. The Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier may be selected from the group consisting of linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, and regularized discriminant analysis. The analysis module may also comprise a binary tree classifier function or an unsupervised learning cluster classifier. In some embodiments, the unsupervised learning cluster classifier is selected from the group consisting of hierarchical clustering analysis, principal component analysis, fuzzy c-means analysis, and fuzzy k-means analysis.


Systems and methods of the invention are useful in examining a tissue comprising epithelial cells. A method of the invention comprises laser-induced fluorescence using light around 337 nm and a threshold classification model that depends on two fluorescence intensity ratios normalized by the intensity of fluorescence at about 431 nm.


The invention enables determining whether a polyp is neoplastic. Systems and methods of the invention enable such determination at the time of endoscopy particularly for diminutive polyps. In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides for identification of polyps (or other features) under about 10 mm in size. In a further preferred embodiment, the invention provides for identification of polyps (or other features) under about 10 mm in size in real time.


The combination of a new design of a fiberoptic probe for making measurements, an analytic method based on a small number of data points, and a simple method of obtaining a normalization factor for the data used provides enhanced diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps.


The invention provides methods that reliably distinguish between neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissue at the time of endoscopy, colonoscopy, colposcopy, or other similar examinations. As a result, patients with non-neoplastic lesions are not subjected to the risk, discomfort and expense of biopsies or excisions. Patients with neoplastic lesions can be identified immediately and treated.


The foregoing and other objects, aspects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following description and from the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The objects and features of the invention can be better understood with reference to the drawings described below. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the drawings, like numerals are used to indicate like parts throughout the various views.



FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an embodiment of the apparatus according to principles of the invention;



FIG. 2 is a plot of the normalized fluorescence spectra of normal colon, neoplastic polyps and non-neoplastic polyps showing a quasi-isosbestic point at 431 nm, according to an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram showing the steps of the analytical method according to principles of the invention; and



FIG. 4 is a graph showing polyp classification results obtained using a linear discriminant analysis according to principles of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In one aspect, the invention utilizes the intensity of fluorescence observed at an isosbestic-like point as a point for normalization. An isosbestic point is a point in wavelength space (or its equivalent) at which a multi-component system exhibits a constant absorbance independent of the relative proportions of the components. Following normalization to peak fluorescence intensity, polyp fluorescence spectra exhibits nearly constant fluorescence intensities at 431 nm. A preferred isosbestic-like point for use in methods of the invention is 431 nm.


According to the invention, normalizing polyp fluorescence spectra to an isosbestic point is nearly equivalent to normalizing to their peak intensities. Generally, the invention involves illuminating a specimen and observing the intensity of responsive light at each of first and second wavelengths. These intensities are normalized with respect to the intensity of light at an isosbestic point. Normalized intensities are typically obtained by dividing an intensity of responsive light at a wavelength by the intensity of light at the isosbestic wavelength. In a preferred embodiment, the fluorescence isosbestic point occurs at a wavelength of about 431 nm.


The first and second wavelengths may be conveniently selected in accordance with a discrimination function analysis, which is described below in greater detail. The normalized responses are used at input values for the discrimination function analysis. The output of the discrimination function analysis is an indication that the specimen examined is healthy or is diseased.


The discrimination analysis can be linear or nonlinear. In general terms, the discrimination function is a mathematical relationship that is constructed in at least two-dimensional space. The mathematical relationship is constructed in relation to groupings of observations corresponding to one or more known medical conditions as compared to observations corresponding to another known condition (e.g., healthy). The discrimination function used in methods of the invention is a mathematical representation of one or more boundaries that separate observations obtained from the sample being interrogated from those corresponding to one or more groups associated with a known condition. As is appreciated by the skilled artisan, numerous discrimination techniques are available for application of the invention. Numerous such techniques are discussed below.


EXAMPLE 1

In one embodiment, the invention is practiced by illuminating tissue with 337 nm excitation light delivered via a single optical fiber. Light that is remitted is collected with a plurality of optical fibers surrounding the illumination fiber. In one embodiment, signals from the individual collection fibers can be averaged into a single spectrum thereby increasing sensitivity. In an alternative embodiment, the signals from the individual collection fibers can be analyzed as discrete signals, for example, by comparing the different signal to determine an extent of tissue that provides a particular response.


An exemplary apparatus 100 used in this embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG. 1. The apparatus 100 includes a source 110 of 337 nm illumination as the excitation source. The excitation illumination is introduced into an optical fiber 120 for delivery to the tissue under examination. The illumination fiber 120 can be tapered starting at about 0.4 mm in diameter at the proximal end and ending at about 0.1 mm at its distal end. In one embodiment, a plurality of optical fibers 130 are used to collect the response signal from the tissue under examination. In the embodiment shown, six collection fibers 130 are placed in a hexagonal array about the central optical fiber 120 that carries the excitation illumination. This geometry is termed herein the “six-around-one fiberoptic probe.” In alternative embodiments, additional hexagonal layers of fibers disposed so as to surround the collection fibers 130. The collection fibers are about 0.1 mm in diameter. The fiberoptic catheter 140 is delivered through the accessory port 150 of a typical endoscope 160 with the distal tip 170 gently touching tissue 180 to be examined. In one embodiment, the returned light is separated into fluorescence bands at 403, 414 and 431 nm using a wavelength dispersive element 190 such as a spectrograph or dichroic filter system. The width of the bands should preferably be under 5 mm. Two intensity ratios (I403/I431 and I414/I431) are then formed and used as input values in a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) threshold model to produce a score indicative of the health of the tissue. Treatment or further diagnostic procedures are based on a characteristic of the score, such as its sign.


This invention, in one embodiment, relates to an optical probe and methods for identifying neoplastic tissues of the colon during endoscopy or colonoscopy and of the cervix of the uterus during colposcopy as well as cancerous and/or pre-cancerous lesions of other organs, such as the esophagus, the urinary bladder, the oral cavity, and the bronchotracheal tree. Systems and methods of the invention can be usefully employed in examining a tissue comprising epithelial cells. A probe according to the invention comprises a plurality of collection fibers surrounding a single illumination fiber. Preferably, the plurality of collection fibers is six fibers. In a preferred embodiment, at least one of the optical fibers of the probe is placed directly in contact with tissue. A method of the invention comprises laser induced fluorescence using 337 mm excitation and a threshold classification model that depends on two fluorescence intensity ratios normalized by the intensity of fluorescence at about 431 nm. In a preferred embodiment, the intensity at about 403 nm is divided by the intensity at about 431 nm and the intensity at about 414 nm is divided by the intensity at 431 nm.


The invention enables determining whether a polyp is neoplastic. Systems and methods of the invention enable such determination at the time of endoscopy particularly for diminutive polyps. In an exemplary embodiment, fluorescent intensity at frequencies other than about 403 nm and about 414 nm are observed, and are normalized by dividing by the intensity of fluorescence observed at about 431 nm.


In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides for identification of polyps (or other features) under about 10 mm in size. In a further preferred embodiment, the invention provides for identification of polyps (or other features) under about 10 mm in size in real time.


Referring to FIG. 2, a plot 200 depicting a plurality of response spectra is shown, for different tissue types illuminated with the same 337 nm excitation-light. In the example shown, the spectra observed correspond to tissues including normal colon 210, non-neoplastic polyps 220, and neoplastic polyps 230. There is a quasi-isosbestic point at 431 mm. The spectra 210, 220, 230 shown in FIG. 2 were recorded with the six-around-one fiberoptic probe.


Changes in optical properties of collagen and blood are the predominant factors in diagnostic differentiation among normal tissue, non-neoplastic polyps, and neoplastic polyps. An algorithm that treats collagen fluorescence, having a peak at about 403 nm in the system of the invention, and hemoglobin absorption, having a peak at about 414 nm for oxyhemoglobin, is sensitive to these changes.


Collagen and blood reside underneath the superficial cellular layer. A fiberoptic geometry designed to probe deeper into tissue but not too deep is more sensitive to changes in collagen and blood and hence in differentiating between types of polyps. The six-around-one fiberoptic probe used according to principles of the invention probes deeper into tissue than does a single fiber system.


Interpatient variability in the intensity of fluorescent response is typically large and affects the diagnostic accuracy of techniques based on absolute fluorescence intensities. Historically, effective diagnostic algorithms have used some form of normalization to reduce interpatient variability. One common approach that has been used is to preprocess the data by normalizing the area under each fluorescence spectrum to unity. However, this approach requires that the entire fluorescence spectrum be measured to calculate the area to be used for the normalization factor. The necessity to record an entire spectral response simply to be able to obtain normalization data is redundant and inefficient. The inefficiency is particularly acute if only the emissions at 1 or 2 wavelengths are to be analyzed.


According to the invention, a quasi-isosbestic point exists at about 431 nm between the fluorescence spectra of normal tissue, hyperplastic polyps and adenomatous polyps. The quasi-isosbestic point is used as a normalization factor that provides effective normalization while requiring fluorescence to be measured at only one addition emission wavelength. For other types of pre-cancerous and/or cancerous polyps, other chemical substances are involved in the progress of the disease. These chemical substances provide characteristic signals that can occur at wavelengths other than at about 403 nm and about 414 nm.


The combination of a new design of a fiberoptic probe for making measurements, an analytic method based on a small number of data points, and a simple method of obtaining a normalization factor for the data used provides enhanced diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps. The efficacy of the new system and method is demonstrated in a single-center prospective clinical trial. A higher fraction of polyps were correctly classified with this technique, (e.g., accuracy=86%) when compared to other approaches. The accuracy of the method using two emission wavelengths is better than that obtained in retrospective clinical trials requiring many more wavelengths. A retrospective trial is one in which one determines the sensitivity of an algorithm that was retrospectively optimized with data in hand. A prospective trial is one that uses a retrospectively trained algorithm in a prospective analysis of data collected after the algorithm is defined and tested.


Analysis Method



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram 300 showing the steps of an illustrative analytical method as applied to the optical signals observed from colonic polyps. The method involves, in the example provided above, observing fluorescent intensities at about 403, about 414 and about 431 mm, as shown at step 310. The ratio of the intensity at about 403 mm to that at about 431 nm (I403/I431), and the ratio of the intensity at about 414 nm to that at about 431 nm (I414/I431) are formed, as indicated at step 320. The two ratios are then examined by comparison to a linear discrimination function, using linear discrimination analysis (LDA), as shown at step 330. A score value greater than zero is indicative of neoplasia, while a score value less than zero indicates non-neoplasia. Resection can be performed, or omitted, based on the score value that is obtained. Result 340 represents performing resection, while result 350 represents not performing resection.


Sensitivity Analysis



FIG. 4 is a graph 400 showing illustrative polyp classification results obtained using a linear discriminant analysis for the colonic polyp example discussed above. One hundred and fifty patients were enrolled in a prospective study in which 94 polyps were collected from 50 patients. In FIG. 4, the about 403 nm to about 431 mm fluorescence intensity ratio (I403/I431) was plotted along the vertical axis 402 against the about 414 mm to about 431 mm ratio (I414/I431) plotted along the horizontal axis 404 for a given polyp. The LDA threshold discrimination model is depicted as the line 410 in FIG. 4 where polyps corresponding to data points that lie above the line 410 are classified as neoplastic polyps and polyps corresponding to data points that lie below the line 410 are classified as non-neoplastic polyps. Using this model, 47 of 52 neoplastic polyps and 34 of 42 non-neoplastic polyps were classified correctly resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 81%, respectively. In addition, 80 of 86 normal colonic tissue sites and 3 of 3 frank adenocarcinomas were correctly classified.


OTHER EXAMPLES

The apparatus of FIG. 1 is used in other exemplary systems and methods of the invention. Specimens to be tested for diagnostic purposes are illuminated with excitation radiation, such as 337 nm illumination. Intensities of fluorescent responses at first and second wavelengths are observed, and are normalized using an intensity of a response at an isosbestic point. In preferred embodiments, the isosbestic point occurs at 431 nm. The normalized intensities are analyzed by comparison to a discrimination function.


Various linear or non-linear discriminant functions can be devised using the complex relationship between tissue fluorescence measured on the surface and the distribution of different fluorophores that exist in different tissue layers. The analysis is further complicated by primary absorption of the excitation light and secondary absorption of the emitted light at different wavelengths by the same fluorophores and other chromophores as the light used for excitation and the emitted light propagate through scattering media such as tissue. Diagnostic systems and methods of the invention will operate according to a non-linear discriminant when an excess and/or a deficit of one or more of such substances is indicative of a condition of health.


Diagnostic systems and methods of the invention will operate according to a non-linear discriminant based on other factors as well. For example, in the field of colposcopy, nonlinear discriminants can vary with other factors such as the age or race of the patient or whether the patient is pre-, peri- or post-menopausal.


Potential Cost Savings


The ability to identify and distinguish benign and malignant polyps in situ could result in substantial cost savings. In this particular example, 39 of 94 polyps would have been spared from being resected and biopsied, representing a 41% savings in surgical and pathology charges. However, at present there is a false negative rate of 9.6%. The long term outcome of not resecting these polyps will need to be determined. In comparison, other techniques spared 14% of the polyps from being biopsied and had a false negative rate of 0.9%. If polyps greater than 5 mm in the latter study are excluded from this analysis then 27% of the polyps would not have been biopsied and the technique would have a 3.2% false negative rate.


Application to Other Tissues


The systems and methods of the invention have been described with regard to observations on colonic tissue. The invention, involving a new probe design and analytical method, can enhance the accuracy for identifying neoplasia in other tissues such as the cervix of the uterus, the esophagus, the urinary bladder, the oral cavity, and the bronchotracheal tree.


Equivalents


While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A system for determining a condition of a tissue, the system comprising: an illumination source for illuminating a tissue with light at an excitation wavelength;a detector for determining a first and second intensity of received electromagnetic radiation from said tissue upon illumination at said excitation wavelength, wherein said first intensity corresponds to a first wavelength and said second intensity corresponds to a second wavelength different from said first wavelength;a computational module for normalizing said first and second intensities with an intensity corresponding to an isosbestic point, and for determining a condition of said tissue based at least in part on said normalized first and second intensities.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein said excitation wavelength is 337 nm.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein said isosbestic point is a wavelength of about 431 nm.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein said illumination source comprises an optical fiber.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein said detector receives light from said tissue by way of a plurality of optical fibers.
  • 6. The system of claim 5, wherein said detector receives fluorescent light from said tissue by way of said plurality of optical fibers.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein said computational module comprises a Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier function.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein said Bayesian Mahalanobis-based classifier is selected from the group consisting of linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, and regularized discriminant analysis.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein said computational module comprises a binary tree classifier function.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein said computational module comprises an unsupervised learning cluster classifier.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein said unsupervised learning cluster classifier is selected from the group consisting of hierarchical clustering analysis, principal component analysis, fuzzy c-means analysis, and fuzzy k-means analysis.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/192,836, filed Jul. 10, 2002, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,768,918 on Jul. 27, 2004 which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

GOVERNMENT RIGHTS

This invention was made with government support under a Small Business Innovation Research Grant (Contract # 1R43CA75773-01) awarded by the Department of Health and Human Services. The government may have certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (306)
Number Name Date Kind
3013467 Minsky Dec 1961 A
3632865 Haskell et al. Jan 1972 A
3809072 Ersek et al. May 1974 A
3890462 Limb et al. Jun 1975 A
3963019 Quandt et al. Jun 1976 A
D242393 Bauman Nov 1976 S
D242396 Bauman Nov 1976 S
D242397 Bauman Nov 1976 S
D242398 Bauman Nov 1976 S
4017192 Rosenthal et al. Apr 1977 A
4071020 Puglise et al. Jan 1978 A
4198571 Sheppard Apr 1980 A
4218703 Netravali et al. Aug 1980 A
4254421 Kreutel, Jr. Mar 1981 A
4273110 Groux Jun 1981 A
4349510 Kolehmainen et al. Sep 1982 A
4357075 Hunter Nov 1982 A
4396579 Schroeder et al. Aug 1983 A
4397557 Herwig et al. Aug 1983 A
4515165 Carroll May 1985 A
4549229 Nakano et al. Oct 1985 A
4558462 Horiba et al. Dec 1985 A
4641352 Fenster et al. Feb 1987 A
4646722 Silverstein et al. Mar 1987 A
4662360 O'Hara et al. May 1987 A
4733063 Kimura et al. Mar 1988 A
4741326 Sidall et al. May 1988 A
4753530 Knight et al. Jun 1988 A
4755055 Johnson et al. Jul 1988 A
4768513 Suzuki Sep 1988 A
4800571 Konishi Jan 1989 A
4803049 Hirschfeld et al. Feb 1989 A
4844617 Kelderman et al. Jul 1989 A
4845352 Benschop Jul 1989 A
4852955 Doyle et al. Aug 1989 A
4877033 Seitz, Jr. Oct 1989 A
4878485 Adair Nov 1989 A
4891829 Deckman et al. Jan 1990 A
4930516 Alfano et al. Jun 1990 A
4945478 Merickel et al. Jul 1990 A
4965441 Picard Oct 1990 A
4972258 Wolf et al. Nov 1990 A
4974580 Anapliotis Dec 1990 A
4979498 Oneda et al. Dec 1990 A
4997242 Amos Mar 1991 A
5003979 Merickel et al. Apr 1991 A
5011243 Doyle et al. Apr 1991 A
5022757 Modell Jun 1991 A
5028802 Webb et al. Jul 1991 A
5032720 White Jul 1991 A
5034613 Denk et al. Jul 1991 A
5036853 Jeffcoat et al. Aug 1991 A
5042494 Alfano Aug 1991 A
5048946 Sklar et al. Sep 1991 A
5054926 Dabbs et al. Oct 1991 A
5065008 Hakamata et al. Nov 1991 A
5071246 Blaha et al. Dec 1991 A
5074306 Green et al. Dec 1991 A
5083220 Hill Jan 1992 A
5091652 Mathies et al. Feb 1992 A
5101825 Gravenstein et al. Apr 1992 A
5120953 Harris Jun 1992 A
5122653 Ohki Jun 1992 A
5131398 Alfano et al. Jul 1992 A
5132526 Iwasaki Jul 1992 A
5139025 Lewis et al. Aug 1992 A
5154166 Chikama Oct 1992 A
5159919 Chikama Nov 1992 A
5161053 Dabbs Nov 1992 A
5162641 Fountain Nov 1992 A
5162941 Favro et al. Nov 1992 A
5168157 Kimura Dec 1992 A
5192980 Dixon et al. Mar 1993 A
5193525 Silverstein et al. Mar 1993 A
RE34214 Carlsson et al. Apr 1993 E
5199431 Kittrell et al. Apr 1993 A
5201318 Rava et al. Apr 1993 A
5201908 Jones Apr 1993 A
5203328 Samuels et al. Apr 1993 A
5205291 Potter Apr 1993 A
5225671 Fukuyama Jul 1993 A
5235457 Lichtman et al. Aug 1993 A
5237984 Williams, III et al. Aug 1993 A
5239178 Derndinger et al. Aug 1993 A
5248876 Kerstens et al. Sep 1993 A
5253071 MacKay Oct 1993 A
5257617 Takahashi Nov 1993 A
5260569 Kimura Nov 1993 A
5260578 Bliton et al. Nov 1993 A
5261410 Alfano et al. Nov 1993 A
5262646 Booker et al. Nov 1993 A
5267179 Butler et al. Nov 1993 A
5274240 Mathies et al. Dec 1993 A
5284149 Dhadwal et al. Feb 1994 A
5286964 Fountain Feb 1994 A
5289274 Kondo Feb 1994 A
5294799 Aslund et al. Mar 1994 A
5296700 Kumagai Mar 1994 A
5303026 Strobl et al. Apr 1994 A
5306902 Goodman Apr 1994 A
5313567 Civanlar et al. May 1994 A
5319200 Rosenthal et al. Jun 1994 A
5321501 Swanson et al. Jun 1994 A
5324979 Rosenthal Jun 1994 A
5325846 Szabo Jul 1994 A
5329352 Jacobsen Jul 1994 A
5337734 Saab Aug 1994 A
5343038 Nishiwaki et al. Aug 1994 A
5345306 Ichimura et al. Sep 1994 A
5345941 Rava et al. Sep 1994 A
5349961 Stoddart et al. Sep 1994 A
5383874 Jackson et al. Jan 1995 A
5398685 Wilk et al. Mar 1995 A
5402768 Adair Apr 1995 A
5406939 Bala Apr 1995 A
5412563 Cline et al. May 1995 A
5413092 Williams, III et al. May 1995 A
5413108 Alfano May 1995 A
5415157 Welcome May 1995 A
5418797 Bashkansky et al. May 1995 A
5419311 Yabe et al. May 1995 A
5419323 Kittrell et al. May 1995 A
5421337 Richards-Kortum et al. Jun 1995 A
5421339 Ramanujam et al. Jun 1995 A
5424543 Dombrowski et al. Jun 1995 A
5450857 Garfield et al. Sep 1995 A
5451931 Miller et al. Sep 1995 A
5452723 Wu et al. Sep 1995 A
5458132 Yabe et al. Oct 1995 A
5458133 Yabe et al. Oct 1995 A
5467767 Alfano et al. Nov 1995 A
5469853 Law et al. Nov 1995 A
5477382 Pernick Dec 1995 A
5480775 Ito et al. Jan 1996 A
5493444 Khoury et al. Feb 1996 A
5496259 Perkins Mar 1996 A
5507295 Skidmore Apr 1996 A
5516010 O'Hara et al. May 1996 A
5519545 Kawahara May 1996 A
5529235 Bolarski et al. Jun 1996 A
5536236 Yabe et al. Jul 1996 A
5545121 Yabe et al. Aug 1996 A
5551945 Yabe et al. Sep 1996 A
5556367 Yabe et al. Sep 1996 A
5562100 Kittrell et al. Oct 1996 A
5579773 Vo-Dinh et al. Dec 1996 A
5582168 Samuels et al. Dec 1996 A
5587832 Krause Dec 1996 A
5596992 Haaland et al. Jan 1997 A
5599717 Vo-Dinh Feb 1997 A
5609560 Ichikawa et al. Mar 1997 A
5612540 Richards-Kortum et al. Mar 1997 A
5623932 Ramanujam et al. Apr 1997 A
5643175 Adair Jul 1997 A
5647368 Zeng et al. Jul 1997 A
5659384 Ina Aug 1997 A
5662588 Lida Sep 1997 A
5685822 Harhen Nov 1997 A
5690106 Bani-Hashemi et al. Nov 1997 A
5693043 Kittrell et al. Dec 1997 A
5695448 Kimura et al. Dec 1997 A
5697373 Richards-Kortum et al. Dec 1997 A
5699795 Richards-Kortum Dec 1997 A
5704892 Adair Jan 1998 A
5707343 O'Hara et al. Jan 1998 A
5713364 DeBaryshe et al. Feb 1998 A
5717209 Bigman et al. Feb 1998 A
5720293 Quinn et al. Feb 1998 A
5730701 Furukawa et al. Mar 1998 A
5733244 Yasui et al. Mar 1998 A
5735276 Lemelson Apr 1998 A
5746695 Yasui et al. May 1998 A
5768333 Abdel-Mottaleb Jun 1998 A
5769792 Palcic et al. Jun 1998 A
5773835 Sinofsky et al. Jun 1998 A
5784162 Cabib et al. Jul 1998 A
5791346 Craine et al. Aug 1998 A
5795632 Buchalter Aug 1998 A
5800350 Coppleson et al. Sep 1998 A
5807248 Mills Sep 1998 A
5813987 Modell et al. Sep 1998 A
5817015 Adair Oct 1998 A
5830146 Skladnev et al. Nov 1998 A
5833617 Hayashi Nov 1998 A
5838435 Sandison Nov 1998 A
5840035 Heusmann et al. Nov 1998 A
5842995 Mahadevan-Jansen et al. Dec 1998 A
5855551 Sklandnev et al. Jan 1999 A
5860913 Yamaya et al. Jan 1999 A
5863287 Segawa Jan 1999 A
5865726 Katsurada et al. Feb 1999 A
5871439 Takahashi et al. Feb 1999 A
5876329 Harhen Mar 1999 A
5894340 Loree et al. Apr 1999 A
5902246 McHenry et al. May 1999 A
5912257 Prasad et al. Jun 1999 A
5920399 Sandison et al. Jul 1999 A
5921926 Rolland et al. Jul 1999 A
5929985 Sandison et al. Jul 1999 A
5931779 Arakaki et al. Aug 1999 A
5938617 Vo-Dinh Aug 1999 A
5941834 Skladnev et al. Aug 1999 A
5983125 Alfano et al. Nov 1999 A
5987343 Kinast Nov 1999 A
5989184 Blair et al. Nov 1999 A
5991653 Richards-Kortum et al. Nov 1999 A
5995645 Soenksen et al. Nov 1999 A
5999844 Gombrich et al. Dec 1999 A
6011596 Burl et al. Jan 2000 A
6021344 Lui et al. Feb 2000 A
6026319 Hayashi Feb 2000 A
6058322 Nishikawa et al. May 2000 A
6067371 Gouge et al. May 2000 A
6069689 Zeng et al. May 2000 A
6083487 Biel Jul 2000 A
6091985 Alfano et al. Jul 2000 A
6095982 Richards-Kortum et al. Aug 2000 A
6096065 Crowley Aug 2000 A
6099464 Shimizu et al. Aug 2000 A
6104945 Modell et al. Aug 2000 A
6119031 Crowley Sep 2000 A
6123454 Canfield et al. Sep 2000 A
6124597 Shehada et al. Sep 2000 A
6135965 Tumor et al. Oct 2000 A
6146897 Cohenford et al. Nov 2000 A
6166079 Follen et al. Dec 2000 A
6169817 Parker et al. Jan 2001 B1
6187289 Richards-Kortum et al. Feb 2001 B1
6208887 Clarke et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210331 Raz Apr 2001 B1
6224256 Bala May 2001 B1
6241662 Richards-Kortum et al. Jun 2001 B1
6243601 Wist Jun 2001 B1
6246471 Jung et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246479 Jung et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258576 Richars-Kortum et al. Jul 2001 B1
6277067 Blair Aug 2001 B1
6285639 Maenza et al. Sep 2001 B1
6312385 Mo et al. Nov 2001 B1
6317617 Gilhuijs et al. Nov 2001 B1
6332092 Deckert et al. Dec 2001 B1
D453832 Morrell et al. Feb 2002 S
D453962 Morrell et al. Feb 2002 S
D453963 Morrell et al. Feb 2002 S
D453964 Morrell et al. Feb 2002 S
6370422 Richards-Kortum et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373998 Thirion et al. Apr 2002 B2
6377842 Pogue et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385484 Nordstrom et al. May 2002 B2
6390671 Tseng May 2002 B1
6405070 Banerjee Jun 2002 B1
6411835 Modell et al. Jun 2002 B1
6411838 Nordstrom et al. Jun 2002 B1
D460821 Morrell et al. Jul 2002 S
6421553 Costa et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424852 Zavislan Jul 2002 B1
6427082 Nordstrom et al. Jul 2002 B1
6466687 Uppaluri et al. Oct 2002 B1
6487440 Deckert et al. Nov 2002 B2
6497659 Rafert Dec 2002 B1
6571118 Utzinger et al. May 2003 B1
6574502 Hayashi Jun 2003 B2
6593101 Richards-Kortum et al. Jul 2003 B2
6593102 Zahniser Jul 2003 B2
6639674 Sokolov et al. Oct 2003 B2
6697666 Richards-Kortum et al. Feb 2004 B1
6760613 Nordstrom et al. Jul 2004 B2
6766184 Utzinger et al. Jul 2004 B2
6768918 Zelenchuk Jul 2004 B2
6818903 Schomacker et al. Nov 2004 B2
6826422 Modell et al. Nov 2004 B1
D500134 Banks et al. Dec 2004 S
6839661 Costa et al. Jan 2005 B2
6847490 Nordstrom et al. Jan 2005 B1
6902935 Kaufman et al. Jun 2005 B2
D507349 Banks et al. Jul 2005 S
6933154 Schomacker et al. Aug 2005 B2
7015310 Remington et al. Mar 2006 B2
20010041843 Modell et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020007122 Kaufman et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020007123 Balas et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020107668 Costa et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020127735 Kaufman et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133073 Nordstrom et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020177777 Nordstrom et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020183626 Nordstrom et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020197728 Kaufman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030095721 Clume et al. May 2003 A1
20030114762 Balas Jun 2003 A1
20030144585 Kaufman et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030163049 Balas Aug 2003 A1
20030207250 Kaufman et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040007674 Schomacker et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010187 Schomacker et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010195 Zelenchuk Jan 2004 A1
20040010375 Schomacker et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040023406 Shomacker et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040206882 Banks et al Oct 2004 A1
20040206913 Costa et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040206914 Schomacker et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040207625 Griffin et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040208385 Jiang Oct 2004 A1
20040208390 Jiang et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040209237 Flewelling et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050054936 Balas Mar 2005 A1
20050090751 Balas Apr 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (28)
Number Date Country
0 135 134 Mar 1985 EP
0 280 418 Aug 1988 EP
0 335 725 Oct 1989 EP
0 444 689 Sep 1991 EP
0 474 264 Mar 1992 EP
0 641 542 Mar 1995 EP
0 689 045 Dec 1995 EP
0 737 849 Oct 1996 EP
1 223 092 Apr 1986 SU
WO 9219148 Nov 1992 WO
WO 9314688 Aug 1993 WO
WO 9426168 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9500067 Jan 1995 WO
WO 9504385 Feb 1995 WO
WO 9705473 Feb 1997 WO
WO 9830889 Feb 1997 WO
WO 9748331 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9805253 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9824369 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9841176 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9918847 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9920313 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9920314 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9947041 Sep 1999 WO
WO 9957507 Nov 1999 WO
WO 9957529 Nov 1999 WO
WO 0015101 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0059366 Oct 2000 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20050043635 A1 Feb 2005 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10192836 Jul 2002 US
Child 10894356 US