Fluoroelastomeric compositions based on vinylidene fluoride, containing small amounts of chlorotrifluoroethylene, having a high adhesion to metals in the vulcanized state

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to fluoroelastomeric compositions based on vinylidene fluoride, having a high adhesion to metals in the vulcanized state, and characterized in that they contain a minor amount of chlorotrifluoroethylene which is present as a comonomer of an elastomeric copolymer of vinylidene fluoride.
The fluoroelastomers with a high fluorine content have generally found a wider and wider utilization in the fields in which a high chemical stability and an excellent resistance to temperatures of 260.degree. C. for continual use are required.
In a few of these utilizations, for example in the field of the sealing on rotary shafts accomplished by means of oil retaining rings, besides the characteristics which are typical of these elements, which are broadly described in literature [for example in Rubb. Ch. Tec. Vol. 55, page 908 (1982)], it is absolutely necessary that between the elastomer, constituting the sealing element of the gasket, and the metal insert, a perfect adhesion characterized by high adhesion coefficient values should be attained.
Therefore, there is the need for some manufactured articles vulcanized from fluoroelastomers to reach a satisfactory vulcanization rate and processing safety, a high metal-to-rubber adhesion which, by remaining unaltered even at high temperatures, renders the vulcanized articles suitable for being used also under the most severe working conditions.
THE PRESENT INVENTION
The fluoroelastomeric compositions according to this invention can be prepared according to one of the two alternative methods described hereinafter.
According to the first method, an elastomeric copolymer of chlorotrifluoroethylene (6-81% by weight), of vinylidene fluoride (18-71% by weight) and optionally of hexafluoropropene (0-41% by weight) and/or tetrafluoroethylene (0-49% by weight), hereinafter referred to as copolymer A, is mixed with an elastomeric copolymer B based on vinylidene fluoride (26-72% by weight), hexafluoropropene (25-44% by weight) and tetrafluoroethylene (0-36% by weight). The content of copolymer A in the total fluoroelastomeric compositions ranges from 1.3 to 30% by weight and is such that the chlorotrifluoroethylene units are preferably in the range of from 1 to 10% by weight, calculated on the total.
Preferably, the content of CFCl.dbd.CF.sub.2 units ranges from 1% to 2.7% by weight referred to the total polymeric mixture. For copolymer A, the preferred compositions, by weight are: CH.sub.2 .dbd.CF.sub.2 from 46% to 64%, CF.sub.2 .dbd.CFCl from 12 to 49%, C.sub.3 F.sub.6 from 0 to 42%, C.sub.2 F.sub.4 from 0 to 32%. For elastomeric copolymer B of the type CH.sub.2 .dbd.CF.sub.2 /C.sub.3 F.sub.6 the preferred compositions are by weight: CH.sub.2 .dbd.CF.sub.2 from 59% to 66% and C.sub.3 F.sub.6 from 41 to 34%, while for the elastomeric copolymer of type CH.sub.2 .dbd.CF.sub.2 /C.sub.3 F.sub.6 /C.sub.2 F.sub.4 the preferred compositions are by weight: CH.sub.2 .dbd.CF.sub.2 from 32 to 51%, C.sub.3 F.sub.6 from 29 to 41%, C.sub.2 F.sub.4 from 17 to 30%.
By means of the second method, the fluoroelastomeric composition according to the invention is preferred by employing a single fluoroelastomeric component, hereinafter referred to as fluoroelastomer C and consisting of a copolymer of vinylidene fluoride (37 to 73% by weight), hexafluoropropene (22 to 41% by weight), chlorotrifluoroethylene (0.6 to 7.5% by weight), tetrafluoroethylene (0 to 37% by weight).
The best results are obtained with CF.sub.2 .dbd.CFCl contents of from 1 to 3.8% by weight.
In both cases, if the chlorofluoroethylene content is below the minimum values indicated hereinabove, the vulcanizate does not exhibit satisfactory adhesion values, while if the CF.sub.2 .dbd.CFCl content is above the maximum limits indicated hereinabove for both cases, though obtaining high adhesion values, some drawbacks such as fouling of the molds and worsening of the vulcanized elastomer's properties of chemical and thermal stability may occur.
The first method indicated herein offers the advantage of permitting to utilize, as basic fluoroelastomer, a vinylidene fluoride fluoroelastomer of the conventional type, imparting to it the desired value of adhesion to metals by admixture with a small amount of a fluoroelastomer having a high CF.sub.2 .dbd.CFCl content.
Copolymers A according to the present invention are preferably prepared under the polymerization-in-emulsion conditions, in the presence of a radicalic starter. Suitable radical starters are the alkaline persulphates, perborates and percarbonates. It is also possible to employ a combination of peroxy starters with reducers, such as sulphites, bisulphites, metabisulphites, thiosulphates, phosphites or hyposulphites of alkaline metals or of ammonium, or copper (I) salts, Fe (II) salts, silver salts and other easily oxidizable metal salts. It is possible to use also organic radical starters and to operate in the presence of surfactants such as Na-laurylsulphate and ammonium perfluoro-octanoate. Of course, a surfactant may be used also when the copolymerization is carried out with an inorganic starter.
The presence of a chain transfer may be useful during the polymerization in emulsion.
The copolymer obtained by copolymerization in emulsion can be isolated from the latex according to conventional methods, for example coagulation with an electrolyte or by freezing, followed by filtration, washing and drying.
The reaction providing the polymer may be also conducted in mass or in an organic liquid such as e.g. a chlorofluorohydrocarbon (freon 113 or 114). It is preferable that the organic liquid present should not act as a chain transfer under the polymerization conditions; by consequence, Freon 114 is preferable to Freon 113.
During the copolymer preparation, the reaction mixture is preferably heated in a pressure reactor, previously "washed" with an inert gas, to temperatures ranging from 45.degree. to 135.degree. C. and pressures of from 4 to 40 kg/cm.sup.2.
Copolymers A of chlorotrifluoroethylene according to the present invention exhibit, in most cases, an inherent viscosity ranging from 0.2 to 1.5 dl/g. The inherent viscosity of these polymers can be determined at 30.degree. C. in solvents such as, for example, methylethylketone, dimethylformamide, tetrahydrofuran, etc.
The Mooney viscosity of the copolymer ranges, in most cases, from 10 to 160, operating at 100.degree. C. with rotor L according to ASTM D 1646 standards.
The copolymers of type A according to this invention are generally preparable conforming to polymerization methods which are well known for the elastomers based on vinylidene fluoride and broadly described in literature (U.S. Pat. No. 2,968,649, U.S. Pat. No. 3,051,677, U.S. Pat. No. 3,053,818, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Kirk-Othmer, vol. 8, 3rd ed., pages 500-515 (1979)), taking care to introduce the desired amount of chlorotrifluoroethylene into the monomeric mixture. Always operating according to what is described hereinbefore, it is possible to obtain fluoroelastomers of group B by working in the absence of chlorotrifluoroethylene.
Fluoroelastomer C according to the present invention is obtainable by means of polymerization methods known for the elastomers based on vinylidene fluoride and, in particular, it is possible to adopt a polymerization-in-emulsion proces according to the operative techniques mentioned hereinabove for copolymer A. Fluoroelastomer C shall have, for the most widely used commercial products, an inherent viscosity between 0.2 and 1.5 dl/g. The Mooney viscosity will range, in most cases, from 50 to 150, operating at 100.degree. C. with rotor L according to the standards mentioned hereinabove.
The vulcanizable fluoroelastomeric compositions according to the present invention, both those based on a mixture of copolymer A and of copolymer B (first method) and those based on fluoroelastomer C only (second method), are preparable by using additives of a known type as vulcanizers, vulcanization accelerators, acid acceptors, etc.
Thus, a fluoroelastomeric composition conforming to this invention essentially comprises:
(1) 100 parts by weight of a mixture of copolymer type A (from 1.3 to 30% by weight) and of copolymer type B (from 98.7 to 70% by weight), or 100 parts by weight of fluoroelastomer type C;
(2) 1 to 40 parts by weight of an acceptor of inorganic acids, which consists in at least a basic oxide of a divalent metal, such as magnesium oxide, calcium oxide, lead oxide;
(3) 0.5 to 10 parts by weight of at least a basic hydroxide such as, for example calcium hydroxide, strontium hydroxide or barium hydroxide and/or salts of weak acids of alkaline or alkaline-earth metals such as, e.g., calcium, strontium, barium, sodium, potassium carbonates, benzoates and phosphates;
(4) an aromatic polyhydroxyl cross-linking agent such as, for example, hydroquinone, hexafluoro-isopropylidene-bis-(4-hydroxy-benzene);
(5) a vulcanization accelerator having the structure of a quaternary compound of nitrogen, of phosphorus, of arsenic and of antimony in an amount ranging from 0.2 to 3 parts, as described in the following patents:
GB No. 1,356,344 (Du Pont), ammonium salts
U.S. Pat. No. 3,876,654 (Du Pont), phosphonium salts
U.S. Pat. No. 3,655,727 (EM), ammonium salts
U.S. Pat. No. 3,752,787 (Du Pont), phosphoranes
GB No. 2,010,285 (ME), amino-phosphonium salts.
Compounds which are particularly useful for this invention are 1-tetrafluoroborate-1-benzyl-N,N',N"-hexamethyl-phosphoranetriamine, 1-chloro-1,1-diphenyl-1-benzyl-N-diethyl-phosphoranamine (prepared according to what is described in J.A.C.S. 84 5794 (1960)). Preparation of the mixes can be accomplished by operating as is described in the above-cited patents. The polymeric compositions according to the invention can be vulcanized also with conventional vulcanizing systems. When it is desired to utilize vulcanizing systems based on organic peroxides, the fluoroelastomeric polymers according to the present invention can be properly modified by introducing into the polymeric chain small amounts of a brominated comonomer, such as BrCF.sub.2 --CF.sub.2 --O--CF.dbd.CF.sub.2, in order to have in the fluoroelastomer from 0.1 to 1.5% by weight of Br.
The preparation of a few copolymers employed for preparing the elastomeric compositions forming the object of the present invention is exemplified hereinafter.
COPOLYMER A.1
3.4 l of water were introduced into a 5-liter autoclave equipped with a mechanical stirrer. It was heated to 80.degree. C. whereafter, by means of a compressor, a mixture coming from a gasholder and having the following composition by weight was introduced into the autoclave:
vinylidene fluoride (VDF) 22.5% hexafluoropropene (PFP) 37.0%, chlorotrifluoro-ethylene (CTFE) 34.5%, till reaching a pressure of 12 atm. gauge. 100 ml of an aqueous solution containing 10 g of ammonium persulphate were fed.
As the pressure decreased to 0.5 kg/cm.sup.2 gauge, it was started again feeding the same gaseous composition contained in another gasholder and having the following by weight composition: VDF=59.7%, CTFE=21.7%, PFP=18.6%, in order to maintain a constant pressure of 12 kg/cm.sup.2 gauge in the autoclave. After 80 minutes, 380 normal liters of monomers were consumed; stirring was stopped, the residual gases were discharged and the latex was collected, which was coagulated with aluminium sulphate and washed with water. The polymer, dried at 60.degree. C., exhibited a Mooney viscosity of 74-ML1+4 (100.degree. C.) (ASTM.D 1646). Its composition in monomeric units was practically corresponding to the one of the mixture of the second gasholder.
COPOLYMER A.2
It was prepared according to the procedure described for elastomer 1, the mixture in the first gasholder having the following by weight composition: VDF=24.4%, PFP=15%, CTFE=60.6%, and the mixture in the second gasholder, the following composition: VDF=50.8%, CTFE=42%, PFP=7.2%.
The polymer composition expressed in monomeric units was practically like that of the monomeric mixture coming from the second vessel. The Mooney viscosity was 76-ML1+4 (100.degree. C.).
COPOLYMER A.3
Always operating as is described hereinbefore, but with a by weight composition in the first gasholder of: VDF=35.5%, CFTE=64.5%, and in the second gasholder of: VDF=56.2%, CTFE=43.8%, a copolymer was obtained, which had a composition practically like that of the mixture fed from the second gasholder and a Mooney viscosity of 80-ML1+4 (10.degree. C.).
COPOLYMER A.4
Always operating as described hereinabove, but with a by weight composition in the first gasholder of VDF=20.4%, CTFE=15.9%, PFP=54.6%, TFE=9.1%, and in the second gasholder: VDF=39.0%, CTFE=19.4%, PFP=25%, TFE=16.6%, a copolymer was obtained, whose composition was practically like that of the mixture fed from the second gasholder.
The Mooney viscosity was 82-ML1+4 (100.degree. C.).
ELASTOMER B.1
It was prepared by operating as is described for copolymer A.1 with a gaseous feeding mixture of VDF+PFP in gasholder 1 and in gasholder 2 in a VDF/PFP weight ratio of 0.43 and 1.7, respectively.
An elastomer was obtained having a by weight composition of about 36.9% of PFP and 63.1% of VDF, and a Mooney viscosity of 85-ML1+4 (100.degree. C.).
ELASTOMER B.2
This terpolymer based ob VDF+PFP+TFE was prepared by operating in like manner as for copolymer B.1 with a feeding gaseous composition VDF/PFP/TFE from the second gasholder in a weight ratio of 43.5/33.9/22.6 and from the first gasholder of 33.8/39.7/26.5.
The obtained polymer had the following by weight composition: VDF=43.5%, PFP=33.9%, TFE=22.6%, and a Mooney viscosity=88-PL1+4 (100.degree. C.).

EXAMPLES 1-8 (Table I)
The examples of Table I as well as the successive ones are given in order to illustrate the characteristics of the vulcanizates obtained from the mixtures of elastomeric copolymers according to the invention. All the indicated amounts are amounts by weight, unless otherwise specified.
In the tables there are indicated the formulations employed, in which there are contained the fluoroelastomers prepared as described hereinabove, namely: composition 1 comprises a mixture of 6.7 parts by weight of copolymer A.1 and 93.3 parts by weight of elastomer B.1; compositions 2 comprises a mixture of 13.4 parts by weight of copolymer A.1 and 86.6 parts by weight of elastomer B.1; composition 3 comprises 26.8% by weight of A.1 and 73.2% by weight of elastomer B.1.; composition 4 is composed of a mixture of copolymer A.2 (6.7% by weight) and of elastomer B.1 (93.3% by weight); composition 5 consists of a mixture of copolymer A.2 (26.8% by weight) and of elastomer B.1 (73.2% by weight); composition 6 consists of a mixture of copolymer A.3 (6.7% by weight) and of elastomer B.1 (93.3% by weight), while composition 7 comprises a mixture of copolymer A.3 (13.4% by weight) and of elastomer B.1 (86.6% by weight).
Accelerator 1 is 1-tetrafluoroborate-1-benzyl-N,N',N"-hexamethyl-phosphoranetriamine.
To evaluate the adhesion between vulcanized elastomeric composition and metal, standard ASTM D 816, method B--"Adhesion strength in shear" was utilized, since the methods based on peeling or stripping measures are also bound to the rubber's tearing resistance.
Specimens in the form of sandwiches, as schematically shown in FIG. 1 (wherein: M=metal, G=rubber, A=adhesive), were prepared. The small metal plates (carbon steel UNI Fe 37 A, dimensions: 80.times.25.times.2 mm) were degreased in a vapor bath of Algofrene 113 (1.1.2-trichloro-trifluoroethane) and sandblasted with corundum granulometry=0.01 mm) in the adhesion areas, then degreased once again. The adhesive was applied by spraying onto the portion intended for adhesion.
As an adhesive, Chemosil 511, a trademark of Henkel, was used.
The adhesion between the plates treated with the adhesive and the elastomer occurred during the vulcanization-in-press step. The overlapping surface was of about 625 mm.sup.2 (rubber thickness=3.8 mm).
Molding conditions:
P=60-70 kg/cm.sup.2
T=170.+-.2.degree. C.
The time was a function of the accelerator concentration and of the CTFE content.
The specimens so prepared were subjected to tensile strength at a speed of 50 mm/min. The adhesion resistance was evaluated after vulcanization in press, after post-vulcanization in oven at 250.degree. C. and after post-vulcanization at 250.degree. C. followed by treatment in boiling water.
In the cases in which breaking of the joint occurred through the rubber, the adhesion resistance was considered to be higher than the measured value.
All the mechanical tests are referred to a temperature of 23.degree. C.
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________ EXAMPLES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8__________________________________________________________________________Elastomer B.1 p.b. weight 100Composition 1 " 100Composition 2 " 100Composition 3 " 100Composition 4 " 100Composition 5 " 100Composition 6 " 100Composition 7 " 100Bisphenol AF 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8Accelerator 1 0,350 0,350 0,350 0,350 0,350 0,350 0,350 0,350Maglite DE (MgO) " 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5Ca(OH.sub.2) " 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5Carbon black MT " 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25Thermomechanical characteristicsO.D.P. at 175.degree. C. (1)Minimum torque (lb. in.) 12 12 13 13 12 13 13 12Ts 2 (min.) 2.7 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.2 3.8 3.3 3.6t' (min.) 4.5 5.1 5.4 5.9 5.5 5.8 5.4 5.9Maximum torque (lb. in.) 12 min. 102 101 98 85 96 82 92 84VulcanizateAdhesion (kg/cm.sup.2) (2)After vulcanization in press 7 27 46 53 47 51 48 55at 175.degree. C. .times. 8 minutesAfter post-vulcanization 15 22 25 46 26 38 27 44in oven at 250.degree. C. .times. 16 hours__________________________________________________________________________ (1) According to ASTM D 2084 (2) According to ASTM D 816 method B
EXAMPLES 9-12 (Table 2)
Composition 8 comprised 6.7% by weight of copolymer A.4 and 93.3% of elastomer B.2.
Composition 9 comprised 13.4% by weight of copolymer A.4 and 93.3% of elastomer B.2.
Composition 10 consisted of 26.8 parts by weight of copolymer A.4 and of 73.2 parts by weight of elastomer B.2.
Accelerator 2 was 1-chloro-1,1-diphenyl-1-benzyl-N-diethylphosphoranamine.
TABLE 2______________________________________ EXAMPLES 9 10 11 12______________________________________Elastomer B.2 p.b. weight 100Composition " 100Composition " 100Composition " 100Bisphenol AF 1,6 1,6 1,6 1,6Accelerator 1 0,550 0,550 0,550 0,550Maglite DE (MgO) " 5 5 5 5Ca(OH.sub.2) " 5 5 5 5Carbon black MT " 25 25 25 25Thermomechanical characteristicsO.D.R. at 175.degree. C. (1)Minimum torque (lb. in.) 22 22 23 25Ts 2 (min.) 3.1 3.4 3.6 3.8t' (50) (min.) 4.0 4.4 4.6 4.9Maximum torque (lb. in.) 132 121 115 108VulcanizateAdhesion (kg/cm.sup.2) (2)After vulcanization in press 6 31 36 43at 175.degree. C. .times. 8 minutesAfter post-vulcanization 13 21 25 36in oven at 250.degree. C. .times. 16 hours______________________________________ (1) See note in Table 1 (2) See note in Table 1
The preparation of elastomers type C will be now described.
ELASTOMER C.1
3.4 l of water were charged into a 5-liter autoclave equipped with a mechanical stirrer. Hexafluoropropene was introduced by means of autogenous pressure in such way as to cause the pressure inside the autoclave to reach 5 atm.
Now it was heated by means of a compressor, and a mixture coming from a gasholder and having the following composition by weight was introduced: vinylidene fluoride (VDF)=62.5%, hexafluoropropene (PFP)=36.1%, chlorotrifluoro-ethylene (CTFE)=1.4%, till reaching a pressure of 12 kg/cm.sup.2 gauge. 100 ml of an aqueous solution containing 10 g of ammonium persulphate were fed. As the pressure decreased to 0.5 kg/cm.sup.2 gauge, it was started again feeding the same gaseous composition contained in the gasholder in order to maintain a constant pressure of 12 kg/cm.sup.2 gauge in the autoclave. After 80 minutes, 380 normal liters of monomer were consumed; stirring was stopped, the residual gases were discharged and the latex was collected, which was coagulated with aluminium sulphate and washed with water. The polymer, dried at 60.degree. C., exhibited a Mooney viscosity of 76-ML1+4 (100.degree. C. (ASTM D 1646). Its composition in monomeric units was practically corresponding to the one of the mixture in the gasholder.
ELASTOMER C.2
It was prepared according to the procedure described for elastomer C.1, the mixture in the gasholder having the following composition: VDF=62.1%, PFP=35.0%, CTFE=2.9%
The polymer composition expressed in monomeric units was the same of the fed monomeric mixture.
Mooney viscosity was 74-ML1+4 (100.degree. C.).
ELASTOMER C.3
Always operating as is described hereinbefore, but with a monomer composition corresponding by weight to VDF=62.5%, PFP=35.4%, CTFE=2.1% and an ammonium persulphate content of 8 g, a copolymer was obtained having a composition practically equal to the one of the fed mixture and a Mooney viscosity of 78-ML+14 (100.degree. C.).
ELASTOMER C.4
It was obtained by operating analogously with what is described for elastomer C.3, but with the following by weight composition of the fed mixture: VDF=60.3%, PFP=34.7%, CTFE=5.0%, Polymerization was conducted at 15 atm.
Mooney viscosity=72-ML1+4 (100.degree.C.).
ELASTOMER C.5
It was obtained in like manner as is described hereinbefore.
Composition by weight: VDF= 64.4%, PFP=28.3%, CTFE=7.3%.
Mooney viscosity=70-ML +14 (100.degree.C.) .
ELASTOMER 6 (comparative)
It was prepared by operating as for elastomer C.1, with a gaseous feeding mixture having a VDF/PFP by weight rapid=1.71 and in the absence of CTFE.
The resulting polymer had this by weight composition: VDF=63.1%, PFP=36.9%, and a Mooney viscosity=78-ML1+4 (100.degree. C.).
EXAMPLES 13-24 (TABLE 3 and 25-30 (TABLE 4)
These examples as well as the successive ones are given in order to illustrate the characteristics of the vulcanizates obtained from elastomers type C according to the invention. All the indicated amounts are by weight, unless otherwise specified.
In the tables there are indicated the formulations employed, in which there are contained the fluoroelastomers prepared as described hereinbefore, namely elastomers C.1, C.2, C.3, C.4 and C.5 according to the invention, and elastomer 6 according to the art; by way of comparison.
The adhesion between vulcanized elastomer and metal was evaluated according to the method described for examples 1-8.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________ Example 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24__________________________________________________________________________Elastomer C.1 by weight 100 100 100 100 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Elastomer C.2 " -- -- -- -- 100 100 100 100 -- -- -- --Elastomer 6 " -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 100 100 100 100Maglite De (MgO) " 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5Ca(OH).sub.2 " 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5Carbon black Mt " 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25Bisphenol AF " 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8Accelerator 1 (as in " 0,250 0,300 0,350 0,450 0,250 0,300 0,350 0,450 0,250 0,300 0,350 0,4500examples 1-8)Thermomechanical characteristicsO.D.R. at 175.degree. C. (1)Minimum torque in. lb 12 10 11 13 14 12 12 8 9 9 9 10T.sub.s (2) minutes 4,2 3,7 3,4 2,9 3,5 3,0 2,7 2,4 4,6 3,2 3,1 2,2t'.sub.c (50) minutes 9,7 6,2 6,5 3,4 7,0 5,7 4,9 4,2 8,9 5,4 4,9 3,2Maximum torque in. lb 68 83 87 91 70 86 88 84 88 88 94 100Mooney viscosity MS at 121.degree. C. (2)minimum value: 43 42 40 38 44 47 40 37 55 52 50 46minutes for an increase by 50 48 44 40 45 42 38 36 60 58 55 4510 points (t10):Vulcanizationin press 170.degree. C. .times. 10 minutesin oven 250.degree. C. .times. 16 hoursModulus at 100% elong. kg/cm.sup.2 (3) 42 43 48 55 43 46 50 55 44 48 58 67Tensile strength kg/cm.sup.2 (3) 155 162 161 158 170 175 171 165 163 157 147 166Elongation at break % (3) 190 210 209 195 195 205 200 195 193 179 163 178Hardness, IRHD (4) 67 67 69 71 68 70 70 71 71 72 74 75Compression setO-rings (.phi. 25.4 .times. 3.53 mm) (5) 19 20 22 23 18 20 21 21 17 19 20 21200.degree. C. .times. 70 hoursVulcanizateAdhesion (6) kg/cm.sup.2 :After vulcanization in press 50 45 39 29 >50 >55 70 49 24 11 10 6at 175.degree. C. .times. 8 minutesAfter post-vulcanization in oven 41 40 27 24 >53 >57 43 41 25 23 27 15at 250.degree. C. .times. 16 hoursAfter thermal ageing 32 31 30 20 >47 >53 36 40 21 19 23 16at 250.degree. C. .times. 16 hours and aqueoustreatment at 100.degree. C. .times. 48 hours__________________________________________________________________________ (1) according to ASTM D 2084 (2) according to ASTM D 1646 (3) according to ASTM D 412 on 2 mm thickness (4) according to ASTM D 1415 on 6 mm thick specimens (5) according to ASTM D 395 method B (6) according to ASTM D 816 method B
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________ Example 25 26 27 28 29 30__________________________________________________________________________Elastomer C.3 by weight 100 100 100 100 -- --Elastomer C.4 " -- -- -- -- 100 --Elastomer C.5 " -- -- -- -- -- 100Maglite De (MgO) " 5 5 5 5 5 5Ca(OH).sub.2 " 5 5 5 5 5 5Carbon black Mt " 25 25 25 25 25 25Bisphenol AF " 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8Accelerator 1 (as in " 0,250 0,300 0,350 0,400 0,400 0,400examples 1-8)Thermomechanical characteristicsO.D.R. at 175.degree. C. (1)Minimum torque in. lb 6,5 7 7,5 6,5 6 6T.sub.s (2) minutes 5,0 4 3,5 2,6 4,5 5,5T'.sub.c (50) minutes 14,1 8,6 7,0 5,0 10,2 19,7Maximum torque in. lb 73 76 80 84 80 79Mooney viscosity MS at 121.degree. C. (2)minimum value: 41 40 38 34 35 33minutes for an increase by 47 45 43 38 37 3010 points (t10):Vulcanizationin press 170.degree. C. .times. 10 minutesin oven 250.degree. C. .times. 16 hoursModulus at 100% elong. kg/cm.sup.2 (3) 50 55 58 62 52 44Tensile strength kg/cm.sup.2 (3) 158 160 168 178 148 123Elongation at break % (3) 180 185 187 191 231 226Hardness, IHRD (4) 66 67 68 68 69 69Compression setO-rings (.phi. 25.4 .times. 3.53 mm) (5) 20 22 23 25 26 26200.degree. C. .times. 70 hoursVulcanizateAdhesion (6) kg/cm.sup.2 :After vulcanization in press >58* >56* >58 >50 >58 >43at 175.degree. C. .times. 8 minutesAfter post-vulcanization in oven >52 >37 >41 >45 >43 >31at 250.degree. C. .times. 16 hoursAfter thermal ageing >44 >35 >37 >37 >31 >56at 250.degree. C. .times. 16 hours and aqueoustreatment at 100.degree. C. .times. 48 hours__________________________________________________________________________ (1) according to ASTM D 2084 (2) according to ASTM D 1646 (3) according to ASTM D 412 on 2 mm thickness (4) according to ASTM D 1415 on 6 mm thick specimens (5) according to ASTM D 395 method B (6) according to ASTM D 816 method B *vulcanization in press at 170.degree. C., 15 minutes. EXAMPLES 31 to 3
These examples evidence how elastomers type C.1prepared according to the present invention permit to obtain a good adhesion also when the fluorine content of the copolymer is high, up to 69% by weight approximately.
As is known, the stability of the fluoroelastomers based on vinylidene fluoride to the organic solvents is highly dependent on the fluorine content (L. D. Albin, Rubb. Chem. Technol. 55, page 903 (1982)). The values of adhesion to metal, of chemical stability and of behavior to low temperatures, evaluating the last value as Tg or glass transition temperature (method DSC with dT/dt=10.degree. C./ min. and brittle point (ASTM D 746) were compared between polymers according to the present invention and polymers according to the art having an equal flurine content (about 69% by weight), a different composition, and always having 1.5% by moles of CTFE corresponding to 1.5-1.9 % by weight, depending on the composition.
Elastomer C.7 was prepared in like manner as elastomer C.1 and exhibited the following by weight composition: (Tg=-4.0.degree. C.)
C.sub.2 H.sub.2 F.sub.2 : 36.4%
C.sub.3 F.sub.6 : 35.7%
C.sub.2 F.sub.4 : 26.0%
C.sub.2 CIF.sub.3 : 1.9%
Elastomer C.8 was prepared according to what is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,032,699 and had the following by weight composition: (Tg=-4.5.degree. C.)
C.sub.2 H.sub.2 F.sub.2 : 20.5%
C.sub.3 F.sub.6 : 78.0%
C.sub.2 ClF.sub.3 : 1.5 %
Reference elastomer 9 was prepared as elastomer C.7 without C.sub.2 ClF.sub.3 ; the composition by weight was the following: (Tg=-5.0.degree. C.)
C.sub.2 H.sub.2 F.sub.2 : 37.1%
C.sub.3 F.sub.6 : 36.4%
C.sub.2 F.sub.4 : 26.5%
TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________ Example 31 32 33 34 35 36__________________________________________________________________________Elastomer C.7 by weight 100 100 -- -- -- --Elastomer C.8 " -- -- 100 100 -- --Elastomer 9 " -- -- -- -- 100 100Maglite De (MgO) " 3 3 3 3 3 3Ca(OH).sub.2 " 6 6 6 6 6 6Carbon black Mt " 30 30 30 30 30 30Bisphenol AF " 2,7 2,7 2,7 2,7 2,7 2,7Accelerator 1 (as in " 0,9 1,1 0,9 1,1 0,9 1,1examples 1-8)Vulcanizationin press 170.degree. C. .times. 10 minutesin oven 250.degree. C. .times. 16 hoursModulus at 100% elong. kg/cm.sup.2 (3) 58 58 60 61 55 55Tensile strength kg/cm.sup.2 (3) 135 140 120 130 155 160Elongation at break % (3) 220 225 246 245 235 230Hardness, IHRD (4) 75 77 83 77 74 75Compression setO-rings (.phi. 25.4 .times. 3.53 mm) (4) 25 27 26 28 36 38200.degree. C. .times. 70 hoursBrittle point (8) .degree.C. -37 -37 -7 7 -38 -38Chemical Stability (7) 5,1 4,8 4,8 4,2 4,5 4,3Toluene 25.degree. C. .times. 70 hoursStauffer blend 7700 11,5 11 10,9 10,2 10,1 9,8200.degree. C. .times. 70 hoursAdhesion (6) kg/cm.sup.2 :After vulcanization in press >51 >46 23 25 21 24at 175.degree. C. .times. 8 minutesAfter post-vulcanization in oven >46 >42 21 23 22 23at 250.degree. C. .times. 16 hoursAfter thermal ageing >40 >39 15 14 14 16at 250.degree. C. .times. 16 hours and aqueoustreatment at 100.degree. C. .times. 48 hours__________________________________________________________________________ (3) according to ASTM D 412 on 2 mm specimens (4) according to ASTM D 1415 on 6 mm thick specimens (5) according to ASTM D 395 method B (6) according to ASTM D 816 method B (7) according to ASTM D 417 i numbers indicate the % by weight of swelling (8) according to ASTM D 746
In the accompanying drawing, FIG. 1 is a schematic showing of a specimen sandwich subjected to tests as described herein and in which M is a metal plate, G is rubber and A is an adhesive.

Number	Date	Country	Kind
21865 A/83	Jun 1983	ITX
21050 A/84	May 1984	ITX

Number	Name	Date
3531432	Graver	Sep 1970
3769371	Nersasian	Oct 1973
4094949	Yokokawa et al.	Jun 1978
4115481	Finlay et al.	Sep 1978
4423192	Van Lang et al.	Dec 1983

Fluoroelastomeric compositions based on vinylidene fluoride, containing small amounts of chlorotrifluoroethylene, having a high adhesion to metals in the vulcanized state

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (2)

US Referenced Citations (5)