1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed towards window locks, and particularly toward manual handles for actuating window locks. Specifically, the present invention is directed to a flush mount or low profile actuating window lock for casement windows. More specifically, the present invention is directed to a flush mounted lock actuator designed to drive a lock bar that locks and unlocks a casement window, and protrudes from the window frame significantly less than prior art designs while employing linkage to prevent the actuator from being back driven from either the locked position or unlocked position. The present invention introduces a lifter and a restrictor arm that shift the pivot points of the handle. The lifter moves vertically relative to a horizontally driving fork component helping to achieve a low profile actuation of the lock.
2. Description of Related Art
Generally, a casement window is a window unit in which the single vent cranks outward, to the right or left. Casement windows are hinged at the side. (Windows hinged at the top are referred to as awning windows.) They are used singly or in pairs within a common frame. Casement windows are often held open using a casement stay. Casement windows open like doors. Like doors, either the left or right side is hinged (or, more accurately, pivoted), and the non-hinged side locks securely into place by a lock bar driven by a lock handle. Unlike a door, the casement window opens not by a knob or handle but by means of some variation of a gear driven operator or lever, which is placed around hand height or at the bottom. A gear driven operator, stay, or friction hinge controls the position of the sash is necessary when the window opens outward, to hold the window in position during inclement weather, such as high winds.
The locking system for a casement window is typically on the side of the window. Lock handles for casement windows are known in the art. Generally, a lock handle is mounted on the frame of the casement window and moves an internally mounted fork component left or right. The fork component drives a lock or tie bar that is also mounted to the frame. One type of locking mechanism for casement windows uses a flat tie bar slidably mounted to the window frame along the open side of the window. The tie bar is provided with multiple pins for locking and driving that extend perpendicularly outward from the tie bar. A locking handle is provided on the interior of the window frame that can be thrown by the user between locked and unlocked positions. The locking handle slides the tie bar, which moves each locking pin between a corresponding locked and unlocked position. A typical lock bar and lock handle to drive the lock bar is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,946,633, entitled “Low Friction Adjustable Roller Pin,” issued to Minter on May 24, 2011.
Lock handles of the prior art are known to protrude from the casement window frame at a distance of approximately 20-25 mm. This protrusion is due to the internal driving mechanism within the handle. Casement window lock handles of the prior art drive a fork component, which engages and slides the lock bar. In order to drive the fork component from one side to the other, the handle casing must have sufficient depth to allow for the handle to pivot about the casing and to allow the fork internally to shift from side to side.
The most relevant prior art does not teach or disclose a locking mechanism capable of low profile (on the order of 8 mm) flush mounting that can be adapted to work with existing tie bar locking designs. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,087,087 issued to Vetter, et al., on Feb. 11, 1992, entitled “Sash Lock,” a basic multipoint window lock mechanism is taught using an actuating lever/handle that drives a sliding lock bar. The actuating lever handle has a pin located at the opposite end from the handle end. The pin is engaged in and drives a fork component on the lock bar. This prior art does not disclose, describe, or suggest any type of lifter mechanism in combination with the fork component to achieve a significantly reduced profile lock actuation. Nor does this prior art design introduce additional linkage to prevent back driving the lock.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,813,710 issued to Anderson on Sep. 29, 1998, entitled “Flush Lock Actuator,” a lock actuator is disclosed to provide a “flush” lock appearance. However, for reasons discussed further herein, the low profile feature of this invention is provided with a design distinctly different from the present design. The Anderson design teaches a handle that is symmetrical and flush with the body of the actuator. The handle is pivoted with respect to the casing about its center on a pin. One end of the handle pivots towards (and into) the window frame, while the other end pivots out of the body and away from the frame. The end that pivots into the window has an actuating link attached to it that drives the lock bar. There is no “lifter” as taught by the present invention to work in combination with a fork component to reduce the casing profile, nor a restrictor arm for redirecting the pivot points of the handle, nor is there any linkage or over center action to prevent back driving the lock.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,829,802 issued to Anderson, et al., on Nov. 3, 1998, entitled “Multi-Point Lock Operator For Casement Window,” a lock actuator is disclosed that drives a multipoint lock bar. Although the actuator handle is not flush, the handle swings a full 180° so that it lies flat at both the locked and unlocked limits of motion. The far end of the actuator handle drives a “universal” link that is connected to the lock bar. In this design, the handle is pivoted directly on the casing or body of the device, which is distinctly different than the present design. Consequently, there is no need for a restrictor arm or any additional linkage for over center security to prevent the lock handle from being back driven.
In general, the prior art is silent with respect to salient features of the present invention that achieve flush mounting and prevent back driving the lock.
Bearing in mind the problems and deficiencies of the prior art, it is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a casement window lock that is flush mounted with a significantly lower profile than the current state of the art.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a casement window lock that allows for complete reversal of the handle from the locking position to the unlocking position, and vice versa.
In yet another object of the present invention, it is desirable to provide a casement window lock that prevents back driving the locking mechanism.
The above and other objects, which will be apparent to those skilled in the art, are achieved in the present invention which is directed to a casement window lock for securing a window sash to a casement window frame, the lock comprising: an elongated casing having a substantially horizontal sidewall section and a vertical section shorter in length than the sidewall section; a fork component adapted to engage a lock bar external to the lock, the fork component in slidable communication with the casing; a lifter in slidable communication with the fork component; a restrictor arm pivotally attached to the casing; and a handle pivotally attached at one end to the lifter, and pivotally attached at an intermediate point on the handle to the restrictor arm; wherein upon rotation the handle engages the lifter to move the fork component horizontally along the casing horizontal sidewall section while simultaneously lifting or lowering the lifter relative to the fork component.
In the preferred embodiment, the casing may include a first track for slidably engaging the fork component, and a second track for slidably engaging the lifter, the first track positioned horizontally about the casing horizontal sidewall section, and the second track having an angled portion slanting vertically relative to the horizontal position of the first track.
Similarly, in the preferred embodiment, the fork component may include a track for slidably communicating with the lifter such that the lifter moves vertically relative to the fork component when engaged by the handle.
It is advantageous for the design of the casement window lock to include a plurality of hinges or pivot points forming an over center linkage to prevent back driving the lock, wherein the over center linkage includes: a first hinge point rotatably joining the handle to the lifter; a second hinge point rotatably joining the handle to the restrictor arm; and a third hinge point rotatably joining the restrictor arm to the casing; such that when the handle is in an unlocked position, the first hinge point is between the second and third hinge points, and the second hinge point is below an action line connecting the first and third hinge points, and when the handle is in the locked position, the second hinge point is between the first and third hinge points, and the second hinge point is below an action line connecting the first and third hinge points.
The over center linkage may also be considered a four bar linkage construction, that is formed by: a first bar formed by the handle between a pivot connected at the lifter and a pivot connected at the restrictor arm; a second bar formed by the restrictor arm and pivoting at each end thereof; a third bar formed by the lifter and the lifter's relative vertical motion between the pivot point where the lifter connects to the handle, and the fork component; and a fourth bar formed by the fork component and horizontal sliding motion of the fork component relative to a fixed pivot point of the restrictor on the casing.
The fork component includes an extension attached to or integral with the fork component, extending perpendicular to the horizontal casing sidewall section for slidable engagement within the first track.
The lifter includes a protrusion attached to or integral with the lifter, extending perpendicular to the horizontal casing sidewall section for slidable engagement with the second track.
Generally, the casement window lock will have a slotted escutcheon attached to the casing.
To secure the lock to a window frame, the lock will employ a retainer comprising a retainer body and a brush seal, wherein the retainer is placed on a window frame opposite the casement window lock, providing a surface for mounting screws through the window frame to the lock.
In a second aspect, the present invention is directed to a casement window lock for securing a window sash to a casement window frame, the lock comprising: a casing having an elongated horizontal sidewall with a shorter vertical dimension, the casing including elongated side members, and tracks on at least one side member extending along an inside surface thereof, the tracks including a first track substantially horizontal and extending along the casing elongated horizontal sidewall, and a second track having at least one angled portion extending vertically relative to the first track's horizontal position; a restrictor arm pivotally attached at one end to the casing, and pivotally attached at the other end to a handle; a fork component including: an attachment portion for engaging a lock bar; an attachment for slidably retaining a lifter; and a protrusion for slidably engaging the first track; the lifter in slidable contact with the fork, including: an extending protrusion for slidably engaging the second track; and an attachment for pivotally connecting the lifter to the handle; and the handle in pivotal communication with the restrictor arm at one end of the handle, and in pivotal communication with the lifter at an intermediate point on the handle; wherein, when the handle is rotated to unlock the lock, the handle pivots about the lifter and the restrictor arm, respectively, causing the fork component to traverse horizontally in a first direction about the first track while simultaneously causing the lifter to shift vertically as the lifter traverses the second track, and when the handle is rotated to lock the lock, the handle pivots about the lifter and the restrictor arm, respectively, causing the fork component to traverse horizontally in a second direction opposite the first direction about the first track while simultaneously causing the lifter to shift vertically as the lifter traverses back on the second track.
In a third aspect, the present invention is directed to a method of locking a casement window having: an elongated casing with a substantially horizontal sidewall section and a vertical section shorter in length than the sidewall section; a fork component adapted to engage a lock bar external to the lock, the fork component in slidable communication with the casing; a lifter in slidable communication with the fork component; a restrictor arm pivotally attached to the casing; and a handle pivotally attached at one end to the lifter, and pivotally attached at an intermediate point on the handle to the restrictor arm; the method comprising: rotating the handle to engage the lifter and move the fork component horizontally along the casing horizontal sidewall section while simultaneously vertically shifting the lifter relative to the fork component to allow the handle to fully rotate approximately 180° from an initial position.
The method further includes causing an over center condition by rotating the handle fully to an unlocked position such that: a first hinge point, rotatably joining the handle to the lifter, is placed between a second hinge point, rotatably joining the handle to the restrictor arm, and a third hinge point, rotatably joining the restrictor arm to the casing, and the second hinge point is below an action line connecting the first and third hinge points; and causing an over center condition by rotating the handle fully to a locked position such that: the second hinge point is placed between the first and third hinge points, and the second hinge point is below an action line connecting the first and third hinge points.
The features of the invention believed to be novel and the elements characteristic of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The figures are for illustration purposes only and are not drawn to scale. The invention itself, however, both as to organization and method of operation, may best be understood by reference to the detailed description which follows taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
In describing the preferred embodiment of the present invention, reference will be made herein to
The lock of the present invention is a low profile, flush design, that protrudes from the window frame significantly less than the prior art, at about 8 mm compared to 25 mm in the current prior art designs. When locking a casement window, the window is closed generally by a crank. The strikes on the moving sash are brought close to the pins on a tie bar mounted to the non-moving window frame. The lock handle is then thrown. This drives a fork component within the lock, which engages the tie bar and drives it, moving the tie bar pins into engagement with corresponding hooks or strikes. The fork component is preferably a flat structure adapted to slide within the lock casing, preferably having two extensions, such as leg portions, for engaging a tie bar. The strikes generally have a ramp surface at their mouth and the pins slide up this ramp into engagement. This motion pulls the sash tightly against the window frame generating compression for sealing the sash to the window frame.
To achieve this “flush,” low profile appearance, the locking mechanism of the present invention introduces a “lifter” that slides vertically with respect the fork component as the fork component transitions horizontally along the elongated sidewall of the casement window lock. In prior art designs, the handle directly drives a fork component or the tie bar—structural limitations that result in a higher profile appearance. In the present design, the handle drives a lifter that is in slidable contact with the fork component. The lifter can “lift” relative to the fork, but cannot move left or right relative to the fork. This indirect drive of the fork through the lifter allows the handle to move more deeply into the mechanism to reduce the height of the lock casing.
Preferably, restrictor arm 2 is riveted to handle 7; however, other attachment schemes may be employed provided handle 7 is rotatably attached to restrictor arm 2 at the desired pivot location. Pivot pin 10 is preferably located at an intermediate point on handle 7 between the handle endpoints at a distance closer to the main casing 1 and escutcheon 4 than the handle's grip portion end 16. This allows for greater mechanical leverage by a user when pulling handle 7 upwards or pushing handle 7 downwards by grip portion end 16. Flush lock handle mechanism 100, in its operating condition, is encased in escutcheon 4, main casing 1, and casing cover 8.
Escutcheon 4 includes a central slot 14 to accommodate the horizontal movement of fork component 5 by handle 7 that establishes the locking and unlocking functions. Slot 14 provides an elongated aperture to accommodate the full range of motion of fork 5 and lifter 6 when these components are actuated by handle 7. Main casing 1 and casing cover 8 form sidewalls for escutcheon 4 and enclose the locking mechanism's moving components.
Lifter 6 preferably includes a lifter pin or other shaped protrusion or extension 30, as depicted in
The relationship between the hinged points of the present invention interplays with the translation of the motion of handle 7 and fork component 5.
When handle 7 is at either end of its travel, the four bar linkage design moves one pivot or hinge on the handle to an over center position relative to two of the three other pivot or hinge points. This over center position prevents the tie bar or lock bar from being back driven to the unlocked position when an “opening” force is applied to rotate handle 7. As shown in
In a preferred embodiment, there is a detent at both ends of travel (open and locked). A detent spring 9 (refer:
To assist with handle stability during operation, a spring washer 3 is preferably employed between restrictor arm 2 and main casing 1. This spring washer, preferably a Belleville spring washer, is capable of providing large amounts of force with very little deflection, thus allowing the present invention to provide upwards of 75 pounds of load with two-tenths of one millimeter (0.2 mm) of deflection. Spring washer 3 also accommodates production variances while maintaining a pre-load force on restrictor arm 2.
In order to assemble the lock mechanism to the frame of a window, a retainer 60 is used. Retainer 60 provides a surface for mounting screws to bear down on.
The present invention achieves a low profile casement window lock that far exceeds the profile depth of casement window locks of the prior art by employing a lifter-fork component combination and restrictor arm to establish a locking structure with multiple pivoting points that allows the handle to rotate completely with minimally required clearance in the casing housing. The pivoting action of the handle, lifter-fork component combination, and restrictor arm, allows the handle to move the fork component horizontally while rising or lower the lifter in relation to the fork component with the lifter in slidable communication with a slanted track on the internal surface of the casing. The multiple pivoting action provides for a four bar linkage that secures the casement window lock in either the open, unlocked position, or closed, locked position, and prevents back driving the lock mechanism in the reverse direction.
While the present invention has been particularly described, in conjunction with the specific preferred embodiment(s), it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of the foregoing description. It is therefore contemplated that the appended claims will embrace any such alternatives, modifications, and variations as falling within the true scope and spirit of the present invention. Thus, having described the invention,
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3949525 | Bates et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4674777 | Guelck | Jun 1987 | A |
4803808 | Greisner | Feb 1989 | A |
4823508 | Allen | Apr 1989 | A |
4937976 | Tucker et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4976066 | Plummer et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4991886 | Nolte et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5050345 | Nakanishi | Sep 1991 | A |
5054239 | Tucker et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5087087 | Vetter et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5118145 | Tucker | Jun 1992 | A |
5152103 | Tucker et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5219195 | Lawrence | Jun 1993 | A |
5318333 | Dreifert | Jun 1994 | A |
5323568 | Blomqvist | Jun 1994 | A |
5370428 | Dreifert et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5531045 | Piltingsrud | Jul 1996 | A |
5618068 | Mitsui et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
D388689 | Bauman et al. | Jan 1998 | S |
D390445 | Johnson et al. | Feb 1998 | S |
5741031 | Bauman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5778602 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5813710 | Anderson | Sep 1998 | A |
5829802 | Anderson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5927768 | Dallmann et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6109668 | Demarco | Aug 2000 | A |
6230457 | Brautigam | May 2001 | B1 |
6354639 | Minter et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367853 | Briggs | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425611 | Minter et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431620 | Tremblay et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6434887 | Nakanishi et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6450554 | Rotondi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6651389 | Minter et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6672010 | Gledhill et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6767038 | Huml | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6837004 | Annes | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7617707 | Chiang | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7708322 | Timothy et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7823935 | Norris et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7900322 | Doring et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7946633 | Minter | May 2011 | B2 |
8353541 | Minter | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8448996 | Lake et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8726572 | Derham | May 2014 | B2 |
20010013202 | Nakanishi et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020066162 | Klompenburg et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030079414 | Rangabasyam et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20080256874 | Curtis et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20120036781 | Runk et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120180392 | Lambertini | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130104458 | Leung et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140070547 | Minter et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140070547 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |