1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to fluted filter media, and in particular, to fluted filter media having flutes which minimize restriction across the filter.
2. Prior Art
Pleated filters which utilize filter media to remove contaminants from fluids are commonly known and take on many configurations.
A common problem with filters is inadequate filter surface area. Prior attempts to improve filtering surface area for a given filter volume have not been entirely successful. Pleated filters are commonly used which utilize a pleated filter media in an attempt to overcome this shortcoming. Although pleated filter material may increase the filter area, as the pleats are placed closer and closer together, thereby placing more and more filter media in a given volume, the pleats are pressed tighter and tighter together, thereby restricting the flow. This restriction may cause the velocity of flow to increase in order to pass through the filtering media, thereby increasing the pressure differential across the filter which may cause additional problems in the system.
Most permeable filter media does not provide structural support so that the filters require housings for supporting the filtering material. This increases manufacturing costs as well as the mass and size of the filter.
To improve restriction and provide increased media area, as well as filter efficiency, fluted filter configurations may be utilized. Fluted filters have the capability of increased media area per unit volume, as well as less restriction and substantially straight-through flow.
Although fluted filters provide improved flow characteristics and efficiency over prior filter designs, fluted filters have the possibility of greater efficiency and improved flow characteristics. The sealed upstream ends of flutes provide a substantial blockage of the flow, and when combined with the filter material, more than half of the available cross sectional area of the fluid flow is blocked. Filter designs which have greater cross sectional area transverse to the flow provide improved flow and restriction characteristics.
It can be seen that new and improved filters are needed which provide self support, improved restriction, improved flow characteristics, and greater efficiency. In particular, fluted filters should have a leading edge which provides less resistance and takes up less of the cross-sectional flow area than standard flute designs. In addition, the cross-sectional area of the filter media and the closed ends of the flutes at the upstream edge should be smaller than the opening area at the upstream edge of the flutes. Such improved filter designs should also be easily manufactured without undue additional steps. The present invention addresses these as well as other problems associated with filter designs.
The present invention is directed to a fluted filter device, and in particular, to fluted filter media with improved flow characteristics.
According to a first embodiment of the present invention, fluted filter media includes a fluting center sheet intermediate a top and bottom layer. It can be appreciated that the filter media may be wound or otherwise stacked so that only a single sheet need be attached to a fluting sheet, as adjacent layers will serve as either the top or bottom sheet of the next adjacent layer. In addition, the layers may be wound in a spiral configuration. Alternating ends of adjacent chambers formed by the fluted material are blocked on either the upstream or downstream side. The first embodiment has tapered flutes which widen from one end to the other. The fluted chambers having their upstream end closed widen to an open downstream end. Conversely, the downstream closed fluted chambers widen to an open upstream end.
It can be appreciated that with this configuration, the area of the filter media transverse to the upstream flow includes a large portion open to the chambers for receiving the flow. As the flow filters through the various filter material sheets, the filtered fluid passes through an enlarged downstream end as well. In this manner, the restriction due to the filter is substantially decreased over standard fluted filter materials. In addition, the percentage of bead material and the upstream edge of the filter sheets is substantially less than the open area receiving the upstream flow.
According to a second embodiment of the present invention, fluted filter media includes asymmetric flutes which have a substantially sharp peak and a widened trough. The area above the trough is open to the upstream flow. In this manner, the upstream openings at the edge of the filter media have a larger cross sectional area transverse to the flow than the area of the closed flutes and the upstream edge of the filter material. This configuration provides improved flow with greater filter efficiency and reduced restriction across the filter.
According to a third embodiment of the present invention, fluted filter media includes a crushed upstream edge providing for improved flow. According to the third embodiment, the leading edge of the filter media includes beads blocking alternating chambers of the filter flutes. The upstream edge of the bead and fluting sheet are angled so that a widened edge intercepts the flow and angles toward the downstream end. As the flow intercepts the upstream edge, only the leading sheeting edge contacts the upstream flow and the bead and fluting sheet angle rearward. With this configuration, the resistance and proportion of the filter media intercepting the upstream flow at the leading edge of the filter is reduced. Therefore, improved flow is attained which provides for increased efficiency and reduced restriction across the filter.
These and various other advantages and features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and forming a part hereof. However, for a better understanding of the invention, its advantages, and the objects obtained by its use, reference should be made to the drawings which form a further part hereof, and to the accompanying descriptive matter, in which there is illustrated and described a preferred embodiment of the invention.
In the drawings, wherein like reference letters and numerals designate corresponding elements throughout the several views:
Referring now to the drawings, and in particular to
During filtration, unfiltered fluid enters the flute chambers 122 which have their upstream ends open, as indicated by the shaded arrows. Upon entering the flute chambers 122, the unfiltered fluid flow is closed off by the second end bead 126 at the downstream end. Therefore, the fluid is forced to proceed through the fluting sheet 108 or face sheets 110. As the unfiltered fluid passes through the fluting sheet 108 or face sheets 110, the fluid is filtered through the filter media layers, as indicated by the unshaded arrow. The fluid is then free to pass through the flute chambers 120, which have their upstream end closed and to flow out the open downstream end out the filter media 100. With the configuration shown, the unfiltered fluid can filter through the fluted sheet 108, the upper facing sheet 112 or lower facing sheet 114, and into a flute chamber 120 blocked on its upstream side.
Referring now to
As shown in
Referring again to
It can be appreciated that to manufacture the tapered flutes 102, a special roller 144 is required, shown in
As shown in
Referring now to
The facing sheets 210 are connected by upstream beads 224 and downstream beads 226. In this manner, the sheets 208, 212 and 214 form chambers 220 having their upstream ends closed and chambers 222 having their downstream ends closed.
It can be appreciated that with the configuration shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
As shown in
The sloped edge can be formed by a number of methods, however a preferred method is shown in
Referring now to
The filter media 400 provides performance advantages as it can be appreciated that large particles 1000 may accumulate at the upstream face of the filter media. As shown in
As shown in
In addition, as shown in
It can be appreciated that with the present invention, filter media is provided which has a substantially greater open area transverse to the flow which intercepts the flow. This provides for increased efficiency with decreased restriction.
It is to be understood, however, that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of the invention, the disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of shape, size and arrangement of parts within the principles of the invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed.
The present application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/069,660, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,268,053 filed Feb. 11, 2008. Application Ser. No. 12/069,660 is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/371,825, filed Feb. 21, 2003, that issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,326. Application Ser. No. 10/371,825 is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/580,091, now abandoned, filed May 30, 2000, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 08/639,220, now abandoned, filed Apr. 26, 1996. The disclosures of application Ser. Nos. 12/069,660, 10/371,825, 09/580,091, and 08/639,220 are incorporated herein by reference
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
678999 | Hobbs | Jul 1901 | A |
891428 | Latus | Jun 1908 | A |
1729135 | Slauson | Sep 1929 | A |
2019186 | Kaiser | Oct 1935 | A |
2038071 | Wilhelm | Apr 1936 | A |
2190886 | Schaaf et al. | Feb 1940 | A |
2397759 | Sigmund | Apr 1946 | A |
2599604 | Bauer et al. | Jun 1952 | A |
2887177 | Mund et al. | May 1959 | A |
3020977 | Huppke et al. | Feb 1962 | A |
3025963 | Bauer | Mar 1962 | A |
3025964 | Summers et al. | Mar 1962 | A |
3037637 | Bub | Jun 1962 | A |
3070937 | Bub | Jan 1963 | A |
3076554 | Bub | Feb 1963 | A |
3112184 | Hollenbach | Nov 1963 | A |
3112262 | Parkinson | Nov 1963 | A |
3247813 | Hart et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
3323963 | Summers | Jun 1967 | A |
3346121 | Bally | Oct 1967 | A |
3372533 | Rummel | Mar 1968 | A |
3401803 | Bub | Sep 1968 | A |
3640396 | Brownell | Feb 1972 | A |
3859068 | McLaren et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
4039457 | Schacht et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4065341 | Cub | Dec 1977 | A |
4158449 | Sun et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4159899 | Deschenes | Jul 1979 | A |
4162906 | Sullivan et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4181513 | Fukuda et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4310419 | Nara et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4410427 | Wydeven | Oct 1983 | A |
4430223 | Miyakawa et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4439321 | Taki et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4441899 | Takagi et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4460388 | Fukami et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4512891 | Wright et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4537608 | Koslow | Aug 1985 | A |
4589983 | Wydevan | May 1986 | A |
4652286 | Kusuda et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4695300 | Takagi | Sep 1987 | A |
4704863 | Abthoff et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4728426 | Rudinger et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4925561 | Ishii et al. | May 1990 | A |
5002666 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5015379 | Drori | May 1991 | A |
5063007 | Gabathuler et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5066432 | Gabathuler et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5174895 | Drori | Dec 1992 | A |
5316676 | Drori | May 1994 | A |
5322537 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5405422 | Ueda et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405423 | Haerle | Apr 1995 | A |
5435870 | Takagaki et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5512075 | Ninomiya et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5543007 | Takagaki et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562825 | Yamada et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5797832 | Ong et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5820646 | Gillingham et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5856860 | Bhalakia et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5902364 | Tokar et al. | May 1999 | A |
D417268 | Gillingham | Nov 1999 | S |
6179890 | Ramos et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190432 | Gieseke et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6235195 | Tokar | May 2001 | B1 |
6350291 | Gieseke et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6416605 | Golden | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6517598 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6610117 | Gieseke et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6783565 | Gieseke et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6887343 | Schukar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7303604 | Gieseke et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7318851 | Brown et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7329326 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7569090 | Nelson | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7625419 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7674308 | Krisko et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7753982 | Merritt | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7909954 | Johnston et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7959702 | Rocklitz et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7959703 | Merritt et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7997425 | Golden et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8101003 | Krisko et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8192623 | Reid et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8206625 | Brown et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8226786 | Schrage et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8268053 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277531 | Brown et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20020096247 | Wydeven | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020185007 | Xu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20060091084 | Merritt et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20080216654 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090127211 | Rocklitz et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
671 096 | Feb 1939 | DE |
0 630 672 | Dec 1994 | EP |
1193833 | Nov 1959 | FR |
2148726 | Mar 1973 | FR |
868058 | May 1961 | GB |
1 213 219 | Nov 1970 | GB |
1 579 883 | Nov 1980 | GB |
56 133005 | Oct 1981 | JP |
60-112320 | Jul 1985 | JP |
60-193216 | Dec 1985 | JP |
64-38121 | Feb 1989 | JP |
1-171615 | Jul 1989 | JP |
01207112 | Aug 1989 | JP |
01128811 | Sep 1989 | JP |
2-25009 | Feb 1990 | JP |
H06-327910 | Nov 1994 | JP |
2001-310402 | Nov 2001 | JP |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/215,718, filed May 2009, Rocklitz et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/271,112, filed May 2006, Nelson, Benny Kevin. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US97/07050 mailed Sep. 12, 1997. |
Notice of Grounds for Rejection, Patent Application No. 9-539102, mailed Jan. 8, 2008, 6 pgs., original and translation. |
Amended Complaint (with Exhibits) and Demand for Jury Trial, Baldwin Filters, Inc., United States District Court District of Minnesota, Civil No. 0:09-cv-01049-JMR-AJB, dated Aug. 27, 2010. |
Answer and Counterclaims of Baldwin Filters, Inc. To Donaldson Company, Inc.'s Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial; Baldwin Filters, Inc., United States District Court District of Minnesota, Civil No. 0:09-cv-01049-JMR-AJB, dated Sep. 10, 2010 (with exhibits). |
Defendant's Prior Art Statement for '326 Patent, United States District Court District of Minnesota, Civil No. 0:09-cv-01049-JMR-AJB, dated Oct. 29, 2010. |
Markman Order Donaldson Company, Inc., Baldwin Filters, Inc., Civil No. 0:09-cv-01049-PJS-AJB, dated Jun. 6, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120312167 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10371825 | Feb 2003 | US |
Child | 12069660 | US | |
Parent | 09580091 | May 2000 | US |
Child | 10371825 | US | |
Parent | 08639220 | Apr 1996 | US |
Child | 09580091 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12069660 | Feb 2008 | US |
Child | 13590250 | US |