The present invention relates to a motorized concrete finishing power trowel with remote control capabilities of blade pitch and throttle control.
There are various types of power trowels in the market place, one type being a conventional walk behind and another other type a light weight pole operated power trowel. One such machine is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,740,348. This machine is controlled by a pole that is afixed to the machine. The machine is enabled to go left or right by raising or lowering the pole. The engine throttle is also controlled by a clockwise or counter-clockwise rotation of the poles, which makes the machine difficult to operate at a distance. The finishing blade that makes contact with the concrete is fixed in one position and will not adjust, which limits the finishing ability.
The present invention differs from the prior art by using a steering mechanism which allows a greater distance and easy one handed steering by rotating poles in a clockwise or counter-clockwise direction, either left or right. This steering design makes it possible to operate the machine at great distances. The present invention also has a rotating hub assembly which resists deflection and provides rigid finish blade mounts. The finish blade on the present invention has a quick release system that allows the blades to be replaced with minimal effort. A blade pitch actuator adjusts the pitch of the blade which is necessary to accommodate changing surface conditions of the concrete as it dries.
The blade pitch actuator and engine throttle are remote controlled making it possible for RPM and blade adjustments while in operation.
A preferred embodiment of the invention is illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which:
In order to better illustrate the advantages of the invention and its contributions to the art, a preferred hardware embodiment of the invention follows.
The control system is made up of two main components, the “handheld” transmitter and the equipment mounted receiver.
The transmitter, shown in
The receiver (48) shown in
Throttle increase and decrease are two of the functions the receiver is required to control. The throttle of the engine (10) is controlled by a microprocessor (47), that is mechanically linked 51A to the carburetor of engine (10). Throttle increase commands that are received cause the throttle to control the engine (10) to be engaged in one direction while decrease commands move it in the other direction. If the throttle is either at full throttle or idle, any further movement in that direction is inhibited. Movement in a particular direction is limited by a combination of electro mechanical switches and mechanical linkages, but could be accomplished in a number of other ways.
Blade pitch increase and decrease are two other functions the receiver must control. The pitch of the blades is controlled by an electric motor 50 that is mechanically linked to pitch control assembly via a belt drive 51B. Pitch increase commands that are received cause the electric motor 50 to be engaged in one direction while decrease commands move it in the other direction. If the pitch control is either at maximum or minimum pitch, any further movement in that direction is inhibited. Movement in a particular direction is limited by a combination of electro mechanical switches and mechanical linkages, but could be accomplished in a number of other ways.
Engine stop is another function of the control system. By depressing and holding a single button on the transmitter (
Several other safety features are built into the control system to allow for safe operation. The receiver (48) is able to automatically perform certain control functions when specific conditions occur. The throttle is returned to idle automatically when an engine stop command is issued from that transmitter or whenever the power switch on the receiver is moved from off to on. The receiver also automatically stops all functions whenever the operator removes his hand from the transmitter.
While this invention has been described and illustrated herein with respect to preferred embodiments, it is understood that alternative embodiments and substantial equivalents are included within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4740348 | Rose | Apr 1988 | A |
4784519 | Artzberger | Nov 1988 | A |
4848960 | Kajioka et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5108220 | Allen et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5372452 | Hodgson | Dec 1994 | A |
5405216 | Allen et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5816740 | Jaszkowiak | Oct 1998 | A |
6019545 | Allen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6106193 | Allen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030215289 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |