Referring to
A mixer 18 mixes the high frequency signal amplified by the RF amplifier circuit 16 with a local oscillation frequency signal output from a local oscillation circuit 20. The mixer 18 outputs an intermediate frequency signal. An intermediate frequency filter 22 extracts a predetermined intermediate frequency component. An intermediate frequency signal having the extracted frequency component is amplified by an IF amplifier circuit 24, and then demodulated by a demodulator circuit 26. Thus, a broadcast audio signal broadcasted from a desired FM radio station is created. The created broadcast audio signal is output from a speaker not shown through a low frequency amplifier circuit 28.
The LPF 14 is an LC resonant type low-pass filter, and constructed as shown in
The difference between the audio frequency of the channel CH1 (=95.75 MHz) and the audio frequency of the channel CH4 (=175.75 MHz) is 80 MHz, and the difference between the audio frequency of the channel CH3 (=107.75 MHz) and the audio frequency of the channel CH6 (=187.75 MHz) is 80 MHz. Thus, a broadcast audio of Tokyo FM Radio is interfered by intermodulation between a broadcast audio of NHK General TV and a broadcast audio of Nippon TV, or intermodulation between a broadcast audio of NHK Educational TV and a broadcast audio of TBS. The main reason of the intermodulation interference is due to nonlinearity of the mixer 18.
Thus, in this embodiment, the LPF 14 having a frequency response shown in
Just for reference, a Table 1 is an experimental result showing how different a resistance to intermodulation interference is depending on the presence or absence of the LPF 14. The experiment shows measure of intermodulation interference characteristics when an FM radio broadcasting signal having an electric field strength of “weak”, “medium”, or “strong” is received assuming that broadcast is performed at audio frequencies of all the channels CH1-CH.
It should be noted that “resistance” means a limit value capable of listening to an FM radio broadcast without pleasantness, and is represented by a numerical value obtained by subtracting a wave level of the FM radio broadcasting signal (expected wave level) from a wave level of the intermodulated interfered signal (interfering wave level). Furthermore, the expected wave level in a weak electric field is assumed to be 22 dB μ, the expected wave level in a medium electric field is assumed to be 65 dBμ, and the expected wave level in a strong electric field is assumed to be 100 dBμ.
According to the Table 1, in the absence of the LPF 14, a resistance to an interfering wave due to the channels CH1 and CH4 is 46 dB in the weak electric field, 22 dB in the medium electric field, and 5 dB) in the strong electric field. Furthermore, a resistance to an interfering wave due to the channels CH2 and CH5 is 46 dB in the weak electric field, 23 dB in the medium electric field, and 6 dB) in the strong electric field. In addition, a resistance to an interfering wave due to the channels CH3 and CH6 is 47 dB in the weak electric field, 25 dB) in the medium electric field, and 7 dB) in the strong electric field.
On the contrary thereto, in the presence of the LPF 14, a resistance to an interfering wave due to the channels CH1 and CH4 is 55 dB in the weak electric field, 31 dB in the medium electric field, and 16 dB) in the strong electric field. Furthermore, a resistance to an interfering wave due to the channels CH2 and CH5 is 57 dB) in the weak electric field, 33 dB) in the medium electric field, and 15 dB) in the strong electric field. In addition, a resistance to an interfering wave due to the channels CH3 and CH6 is 57 dB in the weak electric field, 35 dB in the medium electric field, and 14 dB) in the strong electric field.
Thus, it can be understood that the resistance in the presence of the LPF 14 is more improved by 7 dB to 11 dB than the resistance in the absence of the LPF 14.
As understood from the above description, a high frequency signal received by the antenna 12 ranges from an FM radio broadcast band (76 MHz-90 MHz band: first frequency band) to a television broadcast band (band exceeding 90 MHz: second frequency band) assigned to a frequency higher than the first frequency band. The LPF 14 has an attenuated area corresponding to a television channel of a frequency higher out of the two television channels causing intermodulation interference to an FM radio broadcast band. A part of the frequency component constituting the high frequency signal captured by the antenna 12 is extracted by the LPF 14. The mixer 18 mixes a high frequency signal having the frequency component extracted by the LPF 14 with a local oscillation frequency signal to output an intermediate frequency signal. The demodulator circuit 26 creates an audio signal for FM radio broadcast on the basis of the intermediate frequency signal output from the mixer 18.
Thus, the LPF 14 has an attenuated area corresponding to the television channel causing intermodulation interference, and is provided at the front of the mixer 18. Thus it is possible to prevent intermodulation interference with the FM radio broadcast from occurring. Furthermore, the attenuated area of the LPF 14 corresponds to a television channel of a higher frequency. Thus, it is possible to retain higher receiver sensitivity with respect to the FM radio broadcast band. This makes it possible to comfortably listen to an FM radio broadcast.
It should be noted that in this embodiment, a description is made by utilizing an LPF, but a trap filter 30 shown in
The capacitor C4 has a capacity of 15 pF, and the inductor L2 has a coefficient of induction of 51 nH. A frequency response of the trap filter 30 thus constructed is shown in
Furthermore, in this embodiment, it is assumed that the television broadcast band at a frequency higher than the FM radio broadcast band is provided, but the television broadcast band may be placed at a frequency lower than the FM radio broadcast band. However, in this case, an HPF has to be adopted in place of the LPF 14, which has an attenuated area corresponding to a television channel at a frequency lower out of the two television channels causing intermodulation interference with the FM radio broadcast band.
Additionally, the coefficient of induction of the inductor and a capacitance of the capacitor forming each of the LPF 14 and the trap filter 30 may be modified as necessary depending on the change in environment.
In addition, if there is no need to attach importance to the receiver sensitivity of the FM radio broadcast, the attenuated area of the filter may be brought into correspondence with either of the two television channels causing intermodulation interference, and may be brought into correspondence with both of the two television channels.
Although the present invention has been described and illustrated in detail, it is clearly understood that the same is by way of illustration and example only and is not to be taken by way of limitation, the spirit and scope of the present invention being limited only by the terms of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2006-164348 | Jun 2006 | JP | national |