The present invention relates generally to aggregate removal in excavation machines and cleaning paved surfaces. Specifically, the present invention deals with a dust reduction mechanism on excavation machines and street sweepers.
U.S. Patent Application No. 2010/0202832 to Menzenbach et al., which is herein incorporated for all that it contains, discloses an invention related to a civil engineering machine for spreading material for spreading on soils or base materials, and in particular to a civil engineering machine for spreading binders for soil or base material stabilization, which has a container for material for spreading to receive the material for spreading and a spreading arrangement having one or more outlet openings for the discharge of the material for spreading. The invention relaters in this case both to a civil engineering machine which is intended solely for discharging the binder and to a civil engineering machine, and in particular a stabilizer or recycler, which has a excavation mixing rotor by which, directly after the discharge, the binder can be mixed into the soil or base material which has been milled up. The anti-dust arrangement, which is arranged below the outlet openings, is characterized in that there is created below the outlet openings a spreading compartment which is bounded by one or more first anti-dust space which is bounded by one or more second anti-dust members. What is achieved in this way is that dust which occurs when the material for spreading is being discharged is first retained in the spreading compartment which is surrounded by the first anti-dust members, thus enabling the dust to settle on the ground. Quite a high proportion of the dust is trapped by this means at an early stage. The dust which is not retained in the spreading compartment is then captured in the anti-dust space which is surrounded by the second anti-dust members.
U.S. Patent Application No. 2004/0036346 to Klaasse, which is herein incorporated for all that it contains, discloses a method and an apparatus for reducing dust for use with a working machine which is adapted to fragment material from a working surface and includes at least one partially confined space in which dust occurs. A liquid capable of binding dust is provided and the liquid is sprayed into the partially confined space to trap dust particles generated during fragmentation of the material from the working surface.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,400,220 to Cole, which is herein incorporated for all that it contains, discloses an invention that prevents dust, and particularly respirable dust, from becoming airborne at locations where coal or other dusty products are transferred from one support to another, and where spaces between the pieces of broken material open up and would otherwise release dust into the surrounding atmosphere. Foam, having bubbles small enough to be broken by respirable dust particles, is discharged into the spaces where the small bubbles, bursted by the dust particles, implode and wet the particles and cause adherence of the particles to adjacent surfaces, such as other foam or the broken pieces of material that separate to open up the spaces.
In one aspect of the invention, a system for removing aggregate from a natural or man-made surface includes a vehicle with a frame and a conveyor. The conveyor has an intake end and an output end. An excavation drum is connected to an underside of the frame and is enclosed within an excavation chamber, which is defined by a front plate, side plates, and a moldboard. The intake end of the conveyor protrudes into the excavation chamber through an opening. The conveyor is configured to remove the aggregate from the excavation chamber. A dust suppressant nozzle is configured to apply a foamed dust suppressant to the natural or man-made surface prior to being degraded by the excavation drum.
In some embodiments the excavation drum is configured to lift aggregate within the excavation chamber and allows the aggregate to fall onto the intake end of the conveyor that protrudes into the excavation chamber. However, the excavation drum may be configured to move aggregate through the foamed dust suppressant. The foamed dust suppressant may be configured to coat the aggregate as the excavation drum moves the aggregate through the foamed dust suppressant.
In some embodiments, the dust suppressant nozzle is configured to apply the foamed dust suppressant to the natural or man-made surface within the excavation chamber prior to being degraded by the excavation drum. The foamed dust suppressant may comprise a half life that is at least as long as the duration between applying the foamed dust suppressant to a natural or man-made surface and discharging the foamed dust suppressant with broken aggregate off the output end of the conveyor. In some embodiments, an air compressor is configured to mix air with a liquid dust suppressant to form the foamed dust suppressant. However, the foamed dust suppressant may form before the foamed dust suppressant exits the dust suppressant nozzle. Also, the liquid dust suppressant may comprise water and a foaming agent.
In some embodiments the vehicle comprises a mechanism for applying the foamed dust suppressant that comprises the dust suppressant nozzle, at least one hose, a fluid tank, an air compressor, and a pump. The dust suppressant nozzle may be disposed on the inside of the excavation chamber and supported by the front plate, side plates, and/or conveyor. However, the dust suppressant nozzle may also be disposed at an angle to dispense the foamed dust suppressant in the direction towards the excavation drum. The dust suppressant nozzle may comprise a valve that is configured to adjust the consistency of the foamed dust suppressant.
The dust suppressant nozzle may be configured to apply the foamed dust suppressant to form a foam blanket over the natural or man-made surface. The foam blanket may be configured to span the foamed dust suppressant across the width of a cut formed by the excavation drum into the natural or man-made surface. In some embodiments, the foam blanket is configured to expand until it is degraded by the excavation drum.
In another aspect of the invention, a system for removing aggregate from a natural or man-made surface includes an excavation drum connected to a machine. A dust suppressant nozzle is configured to apply a foamed dust suppressant to the natural or man-made surface prior to being degraded by the excavation drum. The machine may be a milling machine, a mining machine, a continuous miner, a long wall machine, or combinations thereof.
In another aspect of the invention, a system for removing aggregate from a natural or man-made surface includes a nozzle configured to apply a liquid to the natural or man-made surface prior to being degraded by the excavation drum. The liquid may be a liquid dust suppressant that comprises water and a dust binding agent.
In some embodiments the nozzle is a spray nozzle configured to spray the natural or man-made surface prior to being degraded by the excavation drum. The spray nozzle may be a hydraulic nozzle, an air-assisted nozzle, or an ultrasonic nozzle. The nozzle may have multiple orifices.
In some embodiments the nozzle may be a fogging nozzle configured to wet the natural or man-made surface prior to being degraded by the excavation drum.
In some embodiments the nozzle is a water jet cutting nozzle configured to jet fluid in the direction towards the natural or man-made surface proximate the cut formed by the excavation drum into the natural or man-made surface. The water jet cutting nozzle may be configured to degrade the natural or man-made surface preceding the cut formed by the excavation drum into the natural or man-made surface.
a is a perspective view of another embodiment of a dust suppressant nozzle.
b is a detailed view of another embodiment of a dust suppressant nozzle.
a is a perspective view of another embodiment of a dust suppressant nozzle.
b is a cross sectional view of another embodiment of a dust suppressant nozzle.
In the preferred embodiment, the excavation drum 120 lifts the aggregate 210 within the excavation chamber 110 and allows the aggregate 210 to fall onto the intake end 108 of the conveyor 107 that protrudes through an opening 205 in the front plate 104 into the excavation chamber 110.
In some embodiments, the foamed dust suppressant 202 has a half life long enough to last the duration between applying the foamed dust suppressant 202 to a natural or man-made surface and discharging the foamed dust suppressant with the aggregate 210 off the output end 109 of the conveyor 107. Preferably the half life is long enough to keep the dust suppressed while the aggregate 210 is transported by the conveyor 107 and while the aggregate 210 is discharged from the output end 109 of the conveyor 107.
a discloses a plurality of dust suppressant nozzles supported by the front plate 104. In another embodiment a dust suppressant nozzle 201 may be supported by the side plates and/or conveyor. The dust suppressant nozzle may be configured to form a foam blanket over the natural or man-made surface preceding the excavation drum 120. The foam blanket may be configured to span the foamed dust suppressant across the width of a cut formed by the excavation drum into the natural or man-made surface.
b discloses a dust suppressant nozzle 201 discharging a foamed dust suppressant 202. The liquid dust suppressant may be mixed with air under pressure prior to ejection from the nozzle. The mixture of air and liquid dust suppressant may depressurize as the liquid dust suppressant and the air move from the pressurized environment prior to ejection from the nozzle, into the atmospheric pressure after ejection. This depressurization may cause the mixture to expand forming a foamed dust suppressant 202. The liquid dust suppressant may have a greater volume when mixed with air to form the foamed dust suppressant, thereby, requiring less liquid dust suppressant to be utilized in the excavation process.
In another embodiment, the dust suppressant nozzle 201 may have a valve 615 that is configured to adjust the characteristics of the foamed dust suppressant. The valve 615 may cause the dust suppressant nozzle 201 to apply a light or heavy foamed dust suppressant 202. The valve 615 may also cause the foamed dust suppressant 202 to have a wetter or dryer consistency. Dryer foam may be configured to be a foam that blocks dust from becoming airborne.
On the other hand, wetter foam may retain moisture for a significant period of time. Thus, the nozzles may deposit the foam on the surface with the anticipated amount of moisture needed to keep dust at a minimum during the cutting. The foam may hold the moisture on the surface until the aggregate is brought through the foam and the moisture from the foam wets the aggregate. Temporarily storing the moisture in foam on the surface is believed to be more efficient than spraying the surface because spray particles tend to have large enough masses to disrupt the air around the dust, thereby, kicking up unwetted dust particles. Further, the dust particles tend to avoid being hit by the spray particles because the dust particles are so light that the air disturbance created by the spray particles' movement actually pushes the dust particles away.
The foam may be configured to expand at a ratio of 1:10 to 1:500. However, the expansion ration may be preferably around 1:100.
The expansion of the foam may determine the number of nozzles needed to adequately cover the surface within the excavation chamber. After ejection from the nozzle, the foam may expand in every direction, including to the side.
Foaming may be configured to provide an efficient distribution of moisture over the surface. Unlike spray particles, which concentrate their moisture in large particles that tend to pool in the lowest portions of the surface, foam's structure may spread the moisture out more evenly across the surface irrespective of the surface's elevation changes. Thus, foaming may obtain similar results as spraying, but with significantly reduced amounts of moisture applied.
Further, another advantage that the foam provides is holding the moisture where the foam was deposited until the degraded by the excavation drum. In spray applications, water will flow along the path of least resistance, and usually pool in the lowest spot on any surface. This is problematic because water runoff from dirty roads is considered to be a significant environmental hazard. However, the structure of foam will resist its moisture from the pooling and thereby prevent runoff and reduce the amount of moisture needed to reduce dust.
Further, the foam may be used to apply chemicals or agents to the surface that may affect how the surface is degraded. For example, surfactants, waxes, binders, oils, water, clays, salts, mixtures, and combinations thereof may be added to the foam.
The foam may also absorb heat generated through the degradation process, which may reduce thermal damage to the drum, aggregate, and picks. In fact, the foam may help reduce friction between the picks and the surface. In some embodiments, the foam may also reduce sparks between the picks and surface. By reducing the friction, the pick tips may stay sharper longer.
In some embodiments, the size and shape of the aggregate may be valuable. For example, road aggregate may be recycled, but often road milling machines produce too many fines to make a new road of entirely recycled aggregate. Thus, recycled aggregate usually only supplements fresh aggregate. Further, in mining applications, the aggregate may be reduced further after extraction from the mine. However, this aggregate may be sorted by size and distributed to the appropriate crusher or impactor that is most efficient for reducing the particular sizes. Often, prior art excavation processes allow dust, fines, and aggregate to collide. Due to these collisions, the picks' tips wear faster and more fines are generated. However, foam may reduce these collisions may help control the size and shape of the aggregate produced. Additionally, picks that wear slower are more capable of producing consistent aggregate sizes and shapes.
In some embodiments, the valves 615 of the dust suppressant nozzles may be adjusted individually across the span of the excavation chamber 110. The dust suppressant nozzles proximate an area of greater aggregate density may be configured apply a greater amount of foamed dust suppressant or wetter foam. For example, the drum may be configured to direct the aggregate to the center of the excavation chamber where the drum is configured to direct the aggregate towards the conveyor. In other embodiments, the drum may be configured to move the aggregate to one side of the excavation chamber. In some embodiments, the dust suppressant nozzles may be tailored to provide a thick dry layer of foam near the side plates configured to create a barrier that prevents dust from leaving the excavation chamber 110. Thus, the foam may be tailored to perform different functions along the width of the excavation chamber. Some of the foam parameters that may be adjusted across the width may include: moisture content, thickness, expansion ratio, density, and half life.
a discloses an embodiment of a dust suppressant nozzle 201 incorporated into the excavation drum 120. The dust suppressant nozzle 201 may be in fluid communication with a fluid tank 501 and an air compressor 401 through a fluid line 502 inside the excavation drum 120. A plurality of dust suppressant nozzles, fluid tanks, air compressors, and fluid lines may control the distribution of foamed dust suppressant 202.
b discloses the dust suppressant nozzle discharging the foamed dust suppressant 202 onto the natural or man-made surface prior to being degraded by the excavation drum 120. The nozzle may deposit the foam on the surface before the drum engages the surface. However, in some embodiments, the nozzles may be configured to deposit the foamed dust suppressant in the cut region 900 of the surface. The nozzle may inject foamed dust suppressant into the cut region while the drum is rotating and a pick 901 following the nozzle may degrade the surface within the cut region after the foam is deposited.
The use of foam in mining applications avoids the use of excessive amounts of water. Foam may expand up to 1:500, which demonstrates that foam may use a fraction of the water to cover the same surface. Also, in underground mining, the prior art technique of spraying water requires more resources because the water immediately runs off the wall to be milled. While foam is still subject to gravity, foam is lighter and may have better adhesion to the walls, thereby requiring less moisture resources per surface area.
Foam may reduce dust, cool picks, and prevents sparks. When mining combustible natural resources spark reduction may save lives. The foam may cool the spark particles immediately after the spark is generated, isolate the spark particle from combustible gases, and/or keep the surface and picks cool enough that spark particles do not form.
In another embodiment, the nozzle 1201 may be a spray nozzle configured to spray the natural or man-made surface prior to being degraded by the excavation drum 1205. The spray nozzle may be a hydraulic nozzle, an air-assisted nozzle, or an ultrasonic nozzle. The type of nozzle may have a specific spray pattern or spray characteristics that may be more effective for a certain condition to most effectively suppress the dust. The nozzle 1201 may have multiple orifices. The multiple orifices may create multiple streams of liquid 1202 from the same nozzle 1201. The multiple orifices may also allow a single nozzle to spray liquid 1202 to a greater area than a single orifice nozzle.
In another embodiment, the nozzle 1201 may be a fogging nozzle configured to wet the natural or man-made surface prior to being degraded by the excavation drum.
In another embodiment, the nozzle 1201 may be a water jet cutting nozzle configured to jet liquid 1202 in the direction towards the natural or man-made surface proximate the cut formed by the excavation drum 1205 into the natural or man-made surface. The water jet cutting nozzle may be configured to degrade the natural or man-made surface preceding the cut formed by the excavation drum 1205 into the natural or man-made surface. The degradation of the natural or man-made surface by the water jet cutting nozzle reduce the resistance of the natural or man-made surface to the degradation of the excavation drum. The degradation of the natural or man-made surface by the water jet cutting nozzle may also prolong the life of the excavation drum 1205.
The water jet cutting nozzle may also be configured to clean the excavation drum 1205 of aggregate 210. The aggregate 210 may cling to the excavation drum 1205 during the excavation process. The excess aggregate 210 decreases the efficiency of the excavation process. The water jet cutting nozzle may jet liquid 1202 in the direction towards the excavation drum 1205 to expel the excess aggregate 210.
The foamed dust suppressant may reduce dust by foaming a foam blanket over the paved surface and the debris that the vehicle intends to clean. Once deposited, the foamed blanket may expand, and thereby cover more surface area, until removed by the rotary brush. The foam may be light enough that the foam coats the debris without substantially displacing the air around the debris, and thereby, avoids kicking up additional dust. Stirring up additional dust may be hazardous in dusty applications. For example, street sweepers are often used to clean up after a milling machine has milled a road surface, and the resulting degraded road surfaces may comprise a substantial amount of fine aggregate that may be potential air borne dust. By coating over this fine aggregate with a foam blanket, the foam may become a protective layer that insulates the dust from the forces that would cause the dust to become airborne. Also, the foam may transfer moisture to the fine aggregate and thereby cause the dust to be too heavy to become airborne.
Further, another advantage that the foam provides is holding the moisture where the foam was deposited until the rotary brush directs it to the storage compartment. In spray applications, water will flow along the path of least resistance, and usually pool in the lowest spot on any surface. This is problematic because water runoff from dirty roads is considered to be a significant environmental hazard. However, the structure of foam will resist its moisture from the pooling and thereby prevent runoff and reduce the amount of moisture needed to clean a road surface.
In the embodiment of
The dust suppressant nozzle may disposed at an angle to dispense the foamed dust suppressant in the direction away from the rotary brush. Also, the vehicle may comprise a mechanism for applying the foamed dust suppressant that comprises the dust suppressant nozzle, at least one fluid line, a fluid tank, an air compressor, and a pump at least similar to that described above in connection with the excavation drum. The air compressor may mix air with a liquid dust suppressant to form the foamed dust suppressant. In some embodiments, a pump may be needed to pressurize the water that is mixed with the foaming agent to form the foamed dust suppressant. The liquid dust suppressant may comprise water and a foaming agent. Preferably, the air and a liquid dust suppressant are mix before the foamed dust suppressant exits the dust suppressant nozzle. In some embodiments, the dust suppressant nozzle may comprise a valve that is configured to adjust the consistency of the foamed dust suppressant.
Whereas the present invention has been described in particular relation to the drawings attached hereto, it should be understood that other and further modifications apart from those shown or suggested herein, may be made within the scope and spirit of the present invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/102,827 filed on May 6, 2011. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/102,827 is herein incorporated by reference for all that it discloses.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3822955 | Haferkamp et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
4191426 | Ely | Mar 1980 | A |
4400220 | Cole | Aug 1983 | A |
4417992 | Bhattacharyya | Nov 1983 | A |
4487615 | Taylor | Dec 1984 | A |
4551261 | Salihar | Nov 1985 | A |
4561905 | Kittle | Dec 1985 | A |
4780143 | Roe | Oct 1988 | A |
5296264 | Blacklidge | Mar 1994 | A |
5500220 | Roe | Mar 1996 | A |
6276459 | Herrick et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6565281 | Bruns et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6726849 | Gay | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6790245 | Wolff | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7048340 | Lammer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7175364 | Gaertner | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7219964 | Berning | May 2007 | B2 |
7422390 | Gaertner | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7585128 | Hall et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7712996 | Hall et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7942605 | Hall et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20040195545 | Gay et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20090052987 | Hall et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13102827 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 13169704 | US |