Patent Application
20130340280
Embodiments herein relate to the field of foams for footwear midsoles and other such applications.
Ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) is commonly used as a polymer in the foam chemistry of athletic footwear cushioned midsoles. EVA is light, relatively inexpensive and has good cushioning properties when new. However, the cushioning properties tend to diminish quickly with use.
Some footwear manufacturers blend more durable polymers (e.g., polyolefin elastomer) with EVA or replace EVA altogether in order to reduce compression set and enhance resiliency and durability. But, certain elastomeric foams can be expensive and the ranges of performance properties are somewhat limited. Polyolefins have excellent chemical resistance, which renders them difficult to bond with solvent cements, and the surfaces of polyolefin foams have a greater tendency to become oily to the touch. Some manufacturers address this by limiting the amount of polyolefin blended throughout the midsole (typically less than 15%). Other manufacturers apply the polyolefinic foam in a localized fashion, such as under the center of the heel, and then use standard foam throughout the rest of the midsole.
Embodiments will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and the appended claims. Embodiments are illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration embodiments that may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope. Therefore, the following detailed description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of embodiments is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Various operations may be described as multiple discrete operations in turn, in a manner that may be helpful in understanding embodiments; however, the order of description should not be construed to imply that these operations are order dependent.
The description may use perspective-based descriptions such as up/down, back/front, and top/bottom. Such descriptions are merely used to facilitate the discussion and are not intended to restrict the application of disclosed embodiments.
The terms “coupled” and “connected,” along with their derivatives, may be used. It should be understood that these terms are not intended as synonyms for each other. Rather, in particular embodiments, “connected” may be used to indicate that two or more elements are in direct physical contact with each other. “Coupled” may mean that two or more elements are in direct physical contact. However, “coupled” may also mean that two or more elements are not in direct contact with each other, but yet still cooperate or interact with each other.
For the purposes of the description, a phrase in the form “A/B” or in the form “A and/or B” means (A), (B), or (A and B). For the purposes of the description, a phrase in the form “at least one of A, B, and C” means (A), (B), (C), (A and B), (A and C), (B and C), or (A, B and C). For the purposes of the description, a phrase in the form “(A)B” means (B) or (AB) that is, A is an optional element.
The description may use the terms “embodiment” or “embodiments,” which may each refer to one or more of the same or different embodiments. Furthermore, the terms “comprising,” “including,” “having,” and the like, as used with respect to embodiments, are synonymous, and are generally intended as “open” terms (e.g., the term “including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” the term “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term “includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,” etc.).
With respect to the use of any plural and/or singular terms herein, those having skill in the art can translate from the plural to the singular and/or from the singular to the plural as is appropriate to the context and/or application. The various singular/plural permutations may be expressly set forth herein for sake of clarity.
Embodiments herein provide high performance foam formulations and processing methods that address issues with traditional EVA foams. In various embodiments, when used in midsoles, the high performance foam formulations may provide superior impact energy absorption per given load during compression, improved energy recovery during expansion, and reduced compression set over repeated impact cycles.
In various embodiments, the high performance foam formulations may utilize block copolymers to achieve stability. Certain embodiments may use greater concentrations of polyolefins as compared to traditional foams, without degrading the ability to bond adjoining footwear parts. For example, in various embodiments using such high performance foams, an entire midsole may be formed using a greater percentage of polyolefin compared to known foams, and yet, in embodiments, may remain easy to bond, provide an oil-free feel, and/or deliver superior cushioning performance and durability. In various embodiments, one or more polyolefin elastomers and/or olefin block copolymers may be combined with ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) to create a foam having greater resilience, greater tensile strength, reduced shrinkage, reduced compression set, and/or improved bonding, as compared to EVA alone and/or other EVA/polyolefin foams.
In various embodiments, suitable olefinic polymers for the production of the high performance foam formulations disclosed herein may include linear high density polyethylene (HDPE), linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE; e.g., DOWLEX™ brand LLDPE, made by The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Mich.), and ultra low linear density polyethylene (ULDPE; e.g., ATTANE™ brand ULDPE, manufactured by The Dow Chemical Company), etc., homogeneously branched, linear ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymers (e.g., TAFMER™ brand copolymer, manufactured by Mitsui PetroChemicals Company Limited, and EXACT™ brand copolymer, manufactured by Exxon Chemical Company), homogeneously branched, substantially linear ethylene/alpha-olefin polymers (e.g., AFFINITY™, ENGAGE™, and INFUSE™ brand polymers, manufactured by The Dow Chemical Company), and high pressure, free radical polymerized ethylene copolymers, such as EAA (e.g., PRIMACOR™ polymer, manufactured by The Dow Chemical Company) and EVA (e.g., ESCORENE™ polymer, manufactured by Exxon Chemical Company, and ELVAX™ polymer, manufactured by E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.).
In particular embodiments, the olefinic polymers may include homogeneously branched linear and substantially linear ethylene copolymers with a density (measured in accordance with ASTM D-792) from about 0.85 to about 0.92 g/cm3, especially from about 0.85 to about 0.90 g/cm3 and a melt index (measured in accordance with ASTM D-1238 (190/2.16)) from about 0.1 to about 10 g/10 minutes. In various embodiments, the EVA may contain from about 0.5 to about 50 wt % derived from vinyl acetate, and may include one or more EVA polymers having a melt index (ASTM D-1238 (190/2.16)) from about 0.5 to about 10 g/10 minutes. Although the disclosed high performance foams are typically described as including EVA, one of skill in the art will appreciate that in some embodiments, EAA (containing from about 0.5 to about 25 wt % derived from acrylic acid) and similar ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid containing polymers also may be substituted.
As described herein, various embodiments of the disclosed foams may include polyolefin elastomers and/or olefin block copolymers. As used herein, the term “polyolefin elastomer” may refer to a copolymer of ethylene and another alpha-olefin such as butene or octene. In various embodiments, a metallocene catalyst may be used to selectively polymerize ethylene and comonomer sequences, and increasing the comonomer content may produce polymers with higher elasticity as the comonomer incorporation disrupts the polyethylene crystallinity. In various embodiments, the molecular weight of the copolymer may help determine the processing characteristics and end-use performance properties of the polyolefin elastomer, with higher molecular weights providing enhanced polymer toughness.
In various embodiments, polyolefin copolymers may be produced using refined metallocene catalysts often referred to as single-site or constrained geometry catalysts. These catalysts may have a constrained transition metal (generally a Group 4B metal such as Ti, Zr, or Hf) sandwiched between one or more cyclopentadienyl ring structures to form a sterically hindered polymerization site. In various embodiments, this catalyst may provide a single polymerization site instead of the multiple sites of conventional catalysts, and may provide the capability to tailor the molecular architecture of ethylene copolymers.
As used herein, the term “olefin block copolymer” may refer to a polymer having chains with alternating blocks of “hard” (highly rigid) and “soft” (highly elastomeric) segments that are created and assembled via a shuttling process. In various embodiments, because the alternating block types provide highly differentiated material properties along the chain, the traditional relationship of flexibility and heat resistance in the polymer may be disrupted to a beneficial effect. The materials, meanwhile, may provide improved compression set and elastic recovery properties versus other polyolefin plastomers and elastomers. In various embodiments, olefin block copolymers may have both the flexibility of polyolefin plastomers and elastomers and the heat resistance of high density polyethylene.
As described above, in various embodiments, the high performance foams may contain a mixture of EVA, polyolefin elastomer (e.g., ENGAGE™), and/or olefin block copolymer (e.g., INFUSE™). In various embodiments, this mixture may produce a high-performance foam that has an increased resilience compared to traditional EVA foams. For example, in various embodiments, the high performance foam may have a resilience of 48-52% (for example, using the DIN 53512 test for determining the rebound resilience of rubber using the Schob pendulum published by the International Organization for Standardization (IOS); standard 45% min.), as compared to a resilience of about 45% (standard 40% min.) for EVA foam. In some embodiments, resilience may refer to the percentage of energy used to compress a foam that is recovered as mechanical work during expansion of the foam. In some embodiments, resilience may be measured by dropping a missile from a known height onto the foam below, then measuring how high the missile rebounds.
In various embodiments, the high performance foams also may have reduced compression set when compared to traditional EVA foams. For example, in various embodiments, the compression set of the high performance foam may have a maximum of about 45%, whereas EVA foam may have a maximum of about 60% using the ASTM D-395 (B) Standard Test Method for Rubber Property—Compression Set, or the SATRA TM64 Compression Set—Constant Stress Method published by SATRA Technology Centre. In various embodiments, compression set may be measured as a percentage of original thickness of the sample, and may refer to the degree to which a sample loses some of its original dimensions due to permanent deformation.
In various embodiments, the high performance foams also may have a reduced shrinkage rate, as compared to EVA foams. For example, in various embodiments, the shrinkage rate of the high performance foam may be about 1% (70 Asker C, one hour), whereas EVA foam may have a shrinkage rate of about 1.5% (Comparable Example 1: 70 Asker C, 15 minutes; Comparable Example 2: 50 Asker C, 24 hours). Shrinkage may be measured in a variety of ways. In one example, a specimen may be heated to 70° C. for 15 minutes, cooled to room temperature, and the resulting length and width are compared to the starting dimensions. In another example, a specimen may be heated to 50° C. for 24 hours before length and width are measured.
In various embodiments, a high performance foam in accordance with the present disclosure also may include small amounts of pigments, fillers, blowing agents, and/or crosslinking agents. For example, in one specific, non-limiting example, a high performance form in accordance with the present disclosure may include about 1.25 to about 1.75 PHR of ZnO (for example, about 1.3-1.6 PHR, or about 1.1-1.4 PHR), about 0.3-0.7 PHR STA (stearic acid) (for example, about 0.4-0.6 PHR), about 5-15 PHR of filler, about 1.25-1.75 PHR of TiO2 (for example, about 1.4-1.6 PHR), about 2.25-2.75 PHR of blowing agent (for example, about 2.4-2.6 PHR), and/or about 0.4-0.7 PHR of the crosslinker DCP (dicumyl peroxide; for example, about 0.5 to about 0.6 PHR).
As further illustrated in
Although the exemplary foams illustrated in
Although certain embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that a wide variety of alternate and/or equivalent embodiments or implementations calculated to achieve the same purposes may be substituted for the embodiments shown and described without departing from the scope. Those with skill in the art will readily appreciate that embodiments may be implemented in a very wide variety of ways. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the embodiments discussed herein. Therefore, it is manifestly intended that embodiments be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/662,826, filed Jun. 21, 2012, entitled “Foam for Footwear Midsole and the Like,” the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61662826 | Jun 2012 | US |
