Foam process web production with foam dilution

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6444088
  • Patent Number
    6,444,088
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 9, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 3, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A nonwoven web of fibrous material is made by the foam process using a manifold of a particular construction. The manifold has a casing with first and second opposite ends including an inlet for a foam-fiber-surfactant slurry at the first end, and optionally a valved outlet at the second end. A center section of the manifold casing has a (e.g. rectangular) cross-section that becomes smaller moving from an inlet toward the outlet. First and second substantially closed side walls, a porous front wall having an effective length, and a back wall opposite the front wall, are provided for the center section, the walls planar or curved. Any suitable structures are provided for introducing a second (e.g. substantially fiber-free, or a fiber-foam slurry) foam into the center section through the back wall. Pressure sensors penetrating one or both of the side walls may sense the pressure within the center section, and automatically control the introduction of slurry into the inlet, withdrawal through the outlet, and/or introduction of the second foam into/through the back wall, so as to maintain the basis weight of the foam-fiber slurry passing through the front wall substantially constant along the effective length of the front wall.
Description




BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Co-pending application Ser. No. 08/923,250 filed Sep. 4, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,904,809 discloses a foam-laid process, and apparatus for practicing the process, for forming nonwoven fibrous webs which increase the uniformity of the basis weight profile of the nonwoven web produced. The invention provides a manifold, and method, facilitating production of a nonwoven web by the foam process which is a modification of the method and apparatus in said co-pending application by which it is also possible to increase the uniformity of the basis weight profile, allowing a basis weight variation of less than 0.5%, and in fact as low as 0.2% and even lower, depending upon the fibers utilized.




The profile of the nonwoven web produced by the foam process is very much dependent upon the manifold distribution tube construction and design. In the liquid process which uses water, and nearly Newtonian liquids, one tries to make the profile uniform by adjusting both static and dynamic pressure characteristics of the fiber-liquid slurry, including by changing the shape of the back wall of the manifold, and by varying the pressure in the manifold by controlling an outlet valve from the manifold. Foam-fiber-surfactant slurry, however, behaves differently than Newtonian, or near Newtonian liquids, making adjustments of the profile difficult when utilizing conventional manifold pipes. These problems can be greatly magnified if the particular fibers (or particles in the slurry) do not properly flow through the outlet valve in the manifold, are unstable in water, are sensitive to flocculation, or to build-up of knots or filter bundles.




According to the present invention, a manifold facilitating production of a nonwoven web using the foam process, and the foam process for producing nonwoven webs using the manifold, are provided which allow precise control of manifold pressure locally, and simultaneously over substantially the entire length of, the manifold. The web profile and formation can be precisely controlled. Control can be effected by one, or preferably all of, the back pressure established by controlling the outlet valve, feed rate to the manifold, and the feed rate of substantially fiber-free foam into the back wall of the manifold.




According to one aspect of the present invention a manifold facilitating production of a nonwoven web of fibrous material is provided comprising the following components: A manifold casing comprising first and second opposite ends, including an inlet for a foam-fiber slurry at the first end. A center section of the manifold casing having a substantially decreasing effective cross-sectional area from the inlet to the outlet. First and second side walls, a front wall having an effective length, and a back wall, of the center section. The front wall being porous to the foam-fiber slurry to allow passage of the slurry therethrough. Means for introducing a second foam (e.g. substantially fiber free, or a foam fiber slurry, which may include surfactant) into the center section through the back wall. And, the means for introducing the second foam (and perhaps the shape and dimensions of the center section) being constructed so as to facilitate maintaining the basis weight of foam-fiber slurry passing through the front wall substantially constant along the effective length of the front wall.




A significant feature of the manifold is a decreasing cross sectional area from the inlet towards the outlet. The decrease of the cross-sectional area depends on three factors; the amount of slurry discharged from the manifold towards the headbox, the kinetic energy of the slurry inside the manifold, and the surface friction between the manifold walls and the slurry. The manifold may have any shape that takes these into account. For instance, the manifold could be a cylindrical pipe having a conical member therein for decreasing the cross-sectional area. In such a structure the nozzles leading the slurry out of the manifold may be positioned around the cylindrical manifold at all directions, and the pipes supplying the second foam could be disposed at the conical pipe inside the manifold. In this case the side walls and the front wall and back wall are part of a continuous curved structure. In fact, the cross-section of the entire front wall, back wall, and side walls are preferably cylindrical.




Alternatively, the manifold could be two sided i.e. the nozzles attached to the opposite sides of the manifold so that the fiber free foam could be introduced through the other opposite walls where the cross-section of the manifold is rectangular.




The orientation of the manifold typically has very little significance; it may be disposed either in an upright, inclined or horizontal position.




The means for introducing the substantially fiber-free foam into the center section through the back wall may comprise any conventional fluid components including nozzles, perforated plates, baffles, spray heads, or the like. Preferably such means comprises one or more lines of valved pipes, the valves being controllable to vary the amount of foam passing therethrough.




In the preferred embodiment of the manifold the back wall of the center section slopes with respect to the front wall so that the back wall becomes closer to the front wall, and the cross-sectional area of the center section becomes smaller, moving from adjacent the first end of the manifold toward the second end. Preferably the side walls are substantially closed and the back wall is substantially closed except for the means for introducing substantially fiber free foam; and the manifold may further comprise an outlet at the second end of the manifold, in which case the fiber-foam mixture can be recirculated. [A valve may preferably be disposed in the outlet to vary the amount of slurry passing through the outlet.] The front wall may be substantially horizontal, or it may have other orientations. The manifold is typically provided with nozzles and conduits leading the slurry to a headbox, in combination with a moving foramininous element (such as a wire) on which a nonwoven web is formed by slurry passing through the front wall into the nozzles and conduits, and then into the headbox; and in a downstream former foam and liquid are sucked out of the slurry to form the web on the foramininous element.




The manifold may further comprise a plurality of pressure sensors operatively connected to at least one of the substantially closed side walls for sensing the pressure within the center section thereat. Still further the manifold may comprise control means responsive to the pressure sensors for controlling at least one of (preferably all of) introduction of foam-fiber slurry, withdrawal of foam-fiber slurry, and introduction of substantially fiber free foam, into the center section to maintain the basis weight of foam-fiber slurry passing through the front wall substantially constant along the effective length of the front wall. The control means may comprise any conventional type of computer control, fuzzy controller, a multi-variable control unit, or the like that cooperates with valves, baffles, or other conventional fluidic elements to perform the desired function automatically.




The cross-section of the center section may be a parallelogram, or a wide variety of other types of polygons or other shapes (as described above), but preferably is substantially rectangular. The manifold center section typically comprises a polygonal base prism, such as a rectangular base prism.




According to another aspect of the present invention a manifold facilitating production of a nonwoven web of fibrous material is provided comprising the following components: A manifold casing comprising first and second opposite ends, including an inlet for a foam-fiber slurry at the first end, outlet at the second end of the manifold, and a valve disposed in the outlet to vary the amount of slurry passing through the outlet. A center section of the manifold casing having a substantially polygonal cross-section. First and second side walls, a front wall having an effective length, and a back wall, of the center section. The front wall being porous to the foam-fiber slurry to allow passage of the slurry therethrough. Means for introducing a second foam into the center section through the back wall. And, wherein the back wall of the center section slopes with respect to the front wall so that the back wall becomes closer to the front wall, and the cross-sectional area of the center section becomes smaller, moving from adjacent the first end of the manifold toward the second end. The details of the manifold are preferably as described above.




The invention also relates to a method of producing a nonwoven web of fibrous material using a manifold having a front porous wall having an effective length through which foam-fiber slurry can flow, first and second ends separated along the effective length, and a back wall opposing the front wall; and a headbox. The method preferably comprises: (a) Substantially continuously introducing foam-fiber-surfactant slurry into the first end of the manifold. (b) Substantially continuously discharging foam-fiber-surfactant slurry through openings in the manifold front wall to be delivered to the headbox. And, (c) Introducing a second foam (e.g. substantially fiber free, or a fiber-foam slurry having approximately the same, or a different (e.g. by at least about 1%), percentage of fibers as the foam-fiber slurry introduced at (a)) into the manifold through a number of openings spaced at substantially regular intervals substantially over the entire length thereof, so as to maintain the basis weight of foam-fiber-surfactant slurry passing through the manifold front wall substantially constant along the effective length of the manifold front wall.




The method preferably further comprises (d) sensing the pressure in the manifold at a plurality of positions along the length thereof, and practicing (c) in response to the sensed pressure to maintain the basis weight of foam-fiber slurry passing through the front wall has a variation of less than 0.5% along the effective length of the front wall. Preferably (c) is also practiced substantially continuously. Preferably the manifold has a center section between the first and second ends thereof with a substantially polygonal cross-section that gradually decreases substantially along the effective length of the front wall, and in that case (c) is practiced so that the foam-fiber-surfactant slurry moves through the constantly decreasing cross-section of the center section. Also, the method typically further comprises (e) substantially continuously withdrawing some slurry through the second end of the manifold.




It is the primary object of the present invention to provide a manifold, and method of producing a nonwoven web of fibrous material utilizing the manifold, which takes into account the non-Newtonian aspects of the foam-fiber-surfactant slurries, to produce a nonwoven web of substantially constant basis weight along the effective length of the front wall of the manifold. This and other objects of the invention will become clear from an inspection of the detailed description of the invention, and from the appended claims.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a general schematic illustration of a foam laid process system in which the method of the invention may be practiced and the apparatus of the invention utilized;





FIG. 2

is a detail schematic view, partly in cross-section and partly in elevation, showing the feed of a foam/fiber slurry from the mixer to the pump feeding the manifold and headbox of the system of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a perspective schematic detail view, partly in cross-section and partly in elevation, showing the addition of foam per se into the conduit between the manifold and the headbox, according to the invention;





FIG. 4

is a side view, partly in cross-section and partly in elevation, of a detail of an exemplary inclined wire headbox using foam introduction;





FIG. 5

is a schematic representation illustrating the affect of pure foam addition to the conduits leading from the manifold to the headbox;





FIG. 6

is a schematic representation of the basis weight profile of the headbox of

FIGS. 4 and 5

with and without pure foam addition;





FIG. 7

is a perspective schematic view, with one of the side walls cut away for clarity of illustration, of a manifold facilitating production of a nonwoven web of fibrous material using the foam process, according to the invention;





FIG. 8

is a cross-sectional view taken along lines 8—8 of

FIG. 7

;





FIG. 9

is a graphical representation of an exemplary slurry profile that can be obtained by utilizing the invention of

FIGS. 7 and 8

;





FIGS. 10 and 11

are graphs like that of

FIG. 9

only showing aberrant conditions;





FIG. 12

is a side cross-sectional view of a manifold embodiment having a substantially circular cross-section and a conical insert; and





FIG. 13

is a view like that of

FIG. 8

only showing a manifold having a substantially split conical cross-section.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




An exemplary foam-laid process system for practicing a foam laid process with which the invention is desirably utilized is illustrated schematically at


10


in FIG.


1


. The system includes a mixing tank or pulper


11


having a fiber input


12


, a surfactant input


13


, and an input


14


for other additives, such as pH adjustment chemicals like calcium carbonate or acids, stabilizers, etc. The particular nature of the fibers, surfactant, and additives is not critical and they may be varied widely depending upon the exact details of the product being produced (including its basis weight). It is desirable to use a surfactant that can be fairly readily washed out since a surfactant reduces the surface tension of the final web if it is still present, and that is an undesirable feature for some products. The exact surfactant used, from the thousands that are commercially available, is not part of the present invention.




The tank


11


is per se entirely conventional, being the same type of tank that is used as a pulper in conventional paper making systems using the water-laid process. The only differences are that the side walls of the mixer/pulper


11


are extended upwardly about three times the height in the water-laid process since the foam has a density about a third that of water. The rpm and blade configuration of the conventional mechanical mixer in the tank


11


is varied depending upon the particular properties of the product being produced, but is not particularly critical, and a wide variety of different components and variables may be employed. Brakers may also be provided on the walls. There is a vortex at the bottom of the tank


11


from which the foam drains, but the vortex is not visible once start up occurs because the tank


11


is filled with foam and fiber.




The tank


11


also preferably includes therein a large number of pH meters


15


for measuring the pH at a number of different points. pH affects surface tension, and thus desirably is accurately determined. The pH meters are calibrated daily.




At initial start up, water is added with the fiber from line


12


, the surfactant from line


13


, and other additives in line


14


; however, once operation commences no additional water is necessary and there is also foam maintenance in the tank


11


, not merely foam generation.




The foam exits the bottom of the tank


11


, in a vortex, into line


16


under the influence of the pump


17


. The pump


17


, like all other pumps in the system


10


, preferably is a degassing centrifugal pump. The foam discharged from the pump


7


passes in line


18


to further components.





FIG. 1

illustrates an optional holding tank


19


in dotted line. The holding tank


19


is not necessary but may be desirable to ensure a relatively even distribution of the fiber in the foam in case there is some variation that is introduced into the mixer


11


. That is, the holding tank


19


(which is small, typically only on the order of five cubic meters) acts more or less like a “surge tank” for evening out fiber distribution. Because the total time from mixer


11


to the headbox (


30


) is typically only about 45 seconds in the practice of the process, the holding tank


19


—if used—provides time for variations to even out.




When the holding tank


19


is used foam is fed from the pump


17


in line


20


to the top of the tank


19


, and exits the bottom of the tank in line


21


under the influence of centrifugal pump


22


, then leading to line


18


. That is, when the holding tank


19


is used the pump


17


is not directly connected to the line


18


, but only through the tank


19


.




The line


18


extends to the wire pit


23


. The wire pit


23


is per se a conventional tank, again the same as in the conventional water-laid paper process system, but with higher side walls. It is important to make the wire pit


23


so that there are no dead corners and therefore the tank


23


should not be too large. The conventional structure


24


which allows the foam and fiber mixture in line


18


to be introduced into the pump


25


(which is operatively connected adjacent the bottom of the wire pit


23


) will be described further with respect to FIG.


2


. In any event, the pump


25


pumps the foam/fiber mixture in line


18


, introduced by mechanism


24


, and additional foam from the wire pit


23


, into the line


26


. Because a fairly large amount of foam is drawn into the pump


25


from the wire pit


23


, typically the consistency in line


26


is significantly less than that in line


18


. The consistency in line


18


is typically between 2-5% solids (fibers), while that in line


26


is typically between about 0.5-2.5%, although the consistency in each case may be as high as about 12%.




In the wire pit


23


there is no significant separation of the foam into layers of different density. While there is a minimal increase toward the bottom, that degree of increase is small and does not affect operation of the system.




From the line


26


the foam/fiber passes to the manifold


27


which has foam generating nozzles


28


associated therewith. Preferably the nozzles


28


—which are conventional foam generating nozzles (which agitate the foam greatly) as used in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,716,449, 3,871,952, and 3,938,782, which are hereby incorporated by reference herein—are mounted on the manifold


27


, and a large number of the nozzles


28


are mounted on the manifold


27


. Extending from each nozzle


28


is a conduit


29


which leads to the headbox


30


, through which one or more conventional paper making wires (foramininous elements) pass.




The headbox


30


has a plurality of suction boxes (typically about three to five)


31


which withdraw foam from the opposite side of the wire (foramininous element) from the introduction of the foam/fiber mixture, and a final separation box


32


is at the discharge end of the formed web


33


from the headbox


30


. The number of suction boxes


31


provided in the suction table to control drainage are increased for denser products, or for higher speed operation. The formed web


33


, which typically has a solids consistency of about 40-60% (e.g. about 50%), is preferably subjected to a washing action as indicated schematically by wash stage


34


in FIG.


1


. The wash stage


34


is to remove the surfactant. The high consistency of the web


33


means that a minimum amount of drying equipment need be utilized.




The web


33


passes from the washer


34


past one or more optional coaters


35


, to the conventional drying station


36


. In the conventional drying station


36


when synthetic sheath/core fibers (such as Cellbond) are part of the web


33


, the dryer


34


is operated to raise the web above the melting point of the sheath material (typically polypropylene) while the core material (typically PET) does not melt. For example where a Cellbond fiber is used in the web


33


, the temperature in the dryer is typically about 130° C. or slightly more, which is at or slightly above the melting temperature of the sheath fiber, but well below the approximately 250° C. melting temperature of the core fiber. In that way a binding action is provided by the sheath material, but the integrity of the product (provided by the core fiber) is not compromised.




While it is not always necessary, the process contemplates the addition of pure foam to or immediately adjacent the headbox


30


for a number of advantageous purposes. As seen in

FIG. 1

, the centrifugal pump


41


draws foam from the wire pit


23


into line


40


. The foam in line


40


is pumped to a header


42


which then distributes the foam to a large number of different conduits


43


, toward the headbox


30


. The foam may be introduced—as indicated by line


44


—directly underneath the roof of the headbox


30


(where it is an incline wire headbox), and/or via conduits


45


to the lines


29


(or nozzles


28


) for introducing foam/fiber mixture into the headbox


30


. The details of the foam introduction will be described with respect to

FIGS. 3 through 6

.




The suction boxes


31


discharge the foam withdrawn from the headbox


30


in lines


46


into the wire pit


23


. Typically no pumps are necessary, or used, for that purpose.




A significant amount of the foam in the wire pit


23


is recirculated to the pulper


11


. The foam is withdrawn in line


47


by centrifugal pump


48


, and then passes in conduit


47


through the conventional in-line density measurement device


49


for introduction—as indicated schematically at


50


—back into the tank


11


. In addition to providing density measurement for the foam in line


47


at


49


, as schematically illustrated in

FIG. 1

one or more density measuring units (such as denseometers)


49


A may be mounted directly in the tank


11


.




In addition to foam recycle, there is also typically water recycle. The foam withdrawn from the last suction box


32


passes via line


51


to a conventional separator


53


, such as a cyclone separator. The separator


53


—e.g. by vortex action—separates air and water from the foam introduced into the separator


53


to produce water with very little air in it. The separated water passes in line


54


from the bottom of the separator


53


to the water tank


55


. The air separated by the separator


53


passes in line


56


, with the assistance of the fan


57


, from the top of the separator


53


and is discharged to atmosphere, or used in a combustion process or otherwise treated.




A liquid level


58


is established in the water tank


55


, with some liquid overflowing to sewer or treatment, as indicated schematically at


60


in FIG.


1


. Water is also taken from below the level


58


in the tank


55


via line


61


, and under the influence of centrifugal pump


62


is pumped in line


61


through a conventional flow meter


63


(which controls the pump


62


). Ultimately, the recycled water is introduced—as indicated schematically at


64


in FIG.


1


—to the top of the mixer


11


.




Typical flow rates are 4000 liters per minute foam/fiber in line


18


, 40,000 liters per minute foam/fiber in line


26


, 3500 liters per minute foam in line


47


, and 500 liters per minute foam in line


51


.




The system


10


also includes a number of control components. A preferred example of various alternatives for controlling the operation of the system comprises first fuzzy controller,


71


, controls the level of foam in the tank


11


. A second fuzzy controller


72


controls the addition of surfactant in line


13


. A third fuzzy controller


73


controls web formation in the headbox


30


area. A fourth fuzzy controller


74


is used with the washer


34


. A fifth fuzzy controller


75


controls the pH meters


15


, and possibly controls addition of other additives in line


14


to the mixer


11


. Fuzzy control is also used for surfactant and formation control. A multi-variable control system, and a Neuronet control system, also are preferably provided overlaying the other controls. The multi-variable control also is used for controlling the efflux ratio at web formation. The variables can be changed depending upon their effect on desired process regulation, and end result.




In order to facilitate control of the various components, typically a scale


76


is associated with the fiber introduction


12


in order to accurately determine the amount of fiber being added, per unit time. A valve


77


in line


13


may be provided for controlling the introduction of surfactant, as well as a scale


78


. A valve


79


may also be provided in the line


14


.




In the system


10


essentially no valves are provided for intentionally contacting the foam at any point during its handling, with the possible exception of level control valves provided in lines


46


.




Also, during the entire practice of the process of the system of

FIG. 1

the foam is kept under relatively high shear conditions. Since the higher the shear the lower the viscosity, it is desirable to maintain the foam at high shear. The foam/fiber mixture acts as a pseudo-plastic, exhibiting non-Newtonian behavior.




The use of the foam-laid process has a number of advantages compared to the water-laid process particularly for highly absorbent products. In addition to the reduced dryer capacity because of the high consistency of the web


33


, the foam process allows even distribution of virtually any type of fiber or particle (without excessive “sinking” of high density particles while low density particles do “sink” somewhat—they do not sink at all in water) into the slurry (and ultimately the web) as long as the fibers or particles have a specific gravity between about 0.15-13. The foam process also allows the production of a wide variety of basis weight webs, a product with increased uniformity and higher bulk compared to water-laid process products, and a very high level of uniformity. A plurality of headboxes may be provided in sequence, or two (or more) strata may be made at the same time within a headbox with a double wire, etc., and/or the simple coaters


35


may be utilized to provide additional layers with great simplicity (like coating).





FIG. 2

shows the introduction of foam/fiber mixture, and foam, to the pump


25


associated with the wire pit


23


. The structure


24


is known from the Wiggins Teape process such as disclosed in the patents incorporated by reference herein, and the foam/fiber passing in line


18


is caused to be redirected as illustrated by the bent conduit


83


so that from the open end


84


thereof the foam/fiber mixture is discharged directly into the intake


85


of the pump


25


. Foam from the wire pit


23


also flows into the inlet


85


, as illustrated by arrows


86


. Operation of pump


48


, done under fuzzy control; controls the level in wire pit


23


.




Where the fibers to be used to make the foam are particularly long, that is on the order of several inches, instead of directing the line


18


to the suction inlet


85


of the pump


25


(as seen in

FIG. 2

) the line


18


terminates in the line


26


downstream of the pump


25


. In this case the pump


17


must of course provide a higher pressure than it otherwise would, that is sufficient pressure so that the flow from


18


is into the line


26


despite the pressure in line


26


from the pump


25


.





FIG. 3

illustrates the details of one form of an additional foam introduction aspect of the process of the invention.

FIG. 3

illustrates foam per se from lines


45


being introduced into the foam/fiber mixture in the conduit


29


just prior to the headbox


30


. When foam injection lines


45


are utilized they need not inject foam into all of the lines


29


, just enough of them to achieve the desired results. The desired results include (as a primary advantage) a more uniform basis weight profile. If desired the tubes


29


can lead the foam from the foam nozzles


28


to an explosion chamber in the headbox


30


. However there is no real reason to use an explosion chamber in the headboxes for practicing the Ahistrom process. If used, an explosion chamber is solely for security.




The amount of pure foam added in lines


45


, and exactly where it is added, must be determined empirically for each situation, being dependent upon the particular headbox


30


and other equipment used, the type and size of the fibers, and other variables. Under most circumstances the addition of pure foam that is somewhere between about 2-20% of the volume of the foam/fiber mixture gets the desired results.





FIG. 4

illustrates an exemplary incline wire headbox,


301


, which utilizes two different forms of foam injection (the form illustrated in

FIG. 3

plus another). In the headbox


301


of

FIG. 4

the inclined conventional forming wire


90


moves in the direction of the arrow, and with foam injection at


45


the foam/fiber mixture is dispersed in to the headbox


301


from the conduits


29


generally as illustrated in FIG.


4


. Foam is also introduced into headbox


301


via conduit


44


so that the foam flows generally as illustrated at arrow


92


in FIG.


4


. That is the foam flowing in the direction of arrow


92


flows against the bottom of the roof


93


of the headbox


301


. A baffle


94


may be provided in the headbox


301


to ensure the initial flow of the foam in the direction


92


from each of a plurality of the conduits


44


.




The incline (e.g. about 45°) of the headbox


301


is preferred for a number of reasons. If the roof


93


of the headbox


301


is inclined upwardly in the direction of movement of the wire


90


any gas bubble formed at the top of headbox


301


will pass out of the headbox


301


on its own. If the wire


90


forming the bottom of the headbox


301


is horizontal the gas bubble will remain at the top of the headbox


301


, and a special structure (e.g. valved conduit and/or pump) must be provided to remove it.




One reason the substantially pure foam is introduced in one or more conduits


44


is for the purpose of providing less shear of fibers in the headbox


301


so that the fibers in the slurry do not become unidirectional (generally in the direction of the movement of the wire


90


). Under basic fluid dynamic principles, if the foam/fiber mixture is against the roof


93


the friction will cause the fiber orientation at the boundary layer to become unidirectional, which is undesirable. The foam introduced to flow in the direction


92


eliminates that boundary layer problem, acting as a lubricant.




The foam introduced in lines


44


may also have a desirable effect on the basis weight profile of the foam/fiber slurry


91


. Also the foam introduced in lines


44


flowing in direction


92


keeps the bottom of the roof


93


clean, which is also desirable.




The amount of foam introduced in this way (via conduits


44


) also must be determined empirically in each different situation, but normally the optimum will be somewhere within the range of about 1-10% of the volume of the foam/fiber mixture introduced by conduits


29


.




The introduction of the foam in conduits


45


(typically at an angle of between about 30°-90°—compare

FIGS. 3 and 4

) as illustrated in both

FIGS. 3 and 4

, is for a different purpose.

FIG. 5

is a schematic top view (showing only three conduits


29


, whereas normally very many are provided) of the headbox


30


(e.g.


301


) showing the difference pure foam injection makes. Without the injection of substantially fiber-free foam at


45


the foam/fiber mixture introduced by conduits


29


is distributed generally as indicated by lines


91


in

FIGS. 4 and 5

. However when there is foam injection at


45


, the basis weight profile is changed because there is a greater dispersion of the foam fiber mixture, as schematically indicated by lines


96


in FIG.


5


. The affect on the basis weight profile is seen in the schematic illustration in FIG.


6


. The normal basis weight profile (when there is no foam injection), illustrated by line


91


A, includes a large bulge


97


. However when there is foam injection, as indicated by line


96




a


the bulge


98


is much smaller. That is, the basis weight is more uniform. Profile control is effected by adding the diluting foam at the manifold


27


main flow (e.g. before nozzles


28


), or just before or just after the tubes


29


enter headbox


301


(just before being seen at


45


in FIG.


4


), i.e. after nozzles


28


.




If desired the tubes


29


can lead the foam from the foam nozzles


28


to an explosion chamber in the headbox


30


,


301


. However there is no real reason to use an explosion chamber in the headboxes for practicing the process of the invention. If used, an explosion chamber is solely for security.




As seen in dotted line in

FIG. 4

, a foam nozzle


98


may be provided in some or all of the conduits


44


. Also, the basis weight profile may be adjusted using the foam flow


92


(alone or in combination with the flow in conduits


45


). The conduits


44


may branch, one branch in direction


92


, and another to intersect flows


91


(with baffle


94


removed, or penetrated by the second branch).




Utilizing the assemblies illustrated in

FIGS. 3 through 5

it will be seen that the following method steps may be practiced: (a) A first foam slurry of air, water, fibers (e.g. synthetic and cellulosic fibers, although other fibers, such as glass fibers can be used), and any suitable surfactant, is fed into the headbox


301


and into contact with the moving foramininous element


90


. (b) A first substantially fiber-free foam is introduced—as indicated by the arrow


92


in FIG.


4


—into contact with the surface


93


(e.g. the roof) of the headbox


301


at a point remote from the foramininous element


90


. Step (b) is typically practiced to cause foam to flow along the surface


93


toward the element


90


so as to minimize shear of fibers in the headbox


301


so that the fibers do not become unidirectional, in the general direction of movement of the foramininous element


90


, and also so as to keep the surface


93


clean. And there is the step (c) of withdrawing foam through the foramininous element


90


to form a non-woven fibrous web on the element


90


, withdrawal of foam being accomplished utilizing the suction boxes


31


,


32


or any other suitable conventional device for that purpose (such as suction rollers or tables, pressing rolls, or the like).




There may also be a method—which can be seen in all of FIGS.


3


through


5


—that includes the following steps: (a) Feeding a first fiber-foam slurry, such as through the conduits


29


seen in

FIGS. 3 and 4

(e.g. with the flow


91


in basically the same direction of the flow


92


in FIG.


4


); (b) withdrawing the foam through the element


90


(such as described above); and (c) passing a second, substantially fiber-free foam, into the first foam slurry (as indicated at


45


in both

FIGS. 3 and 4

) near where the first foam slurry is fed into the headbox


30


,


301


(typically at manifold


27


, or up to just past the point of introduction thereof) so as to provide a more uniform basis weight profile of the non-woven web produced (as seen in FIG.


6


).




In the practice of the method according to the present invention, and utilization of the system, typical foam-laid process parameters that may be utilized are set forth in the following table (although the range of parameters can be wider if a product range is wider):
















PARAMETER




VALUE











pH (substantially entire system)




About 6.5






temperature




About 20-40° C.






manifold pressure




1-1.8 bar






consistency in mixer




2.5%






consistency in headbox




.5-2.5%






particle, filler, or other additive




About 5-20%






consistency






consistency of formed web




About 40-60%






web basis weight variations




Less than ½%






foam density (with or without fibers)




250-450 grams per liter at 1 bar






foam bubble size




.3-.5 mm average diameter (a







Gaussian distribution)






foam air content




25-75% (e.g. a 60%; changes with







pressure in the process)






viscosity




there is no “target” viscosity, but







typically the foam has viscosity on







the order of 2-5 centipoises under







high shear conditions, and 200 k-







300 k centipoises at low shear







conditions, which ranges may be







wider depending on the manner of







determining viscosity.






web formation speed




about 200-500 meters per minute






specific gravity of fibers or additives




anywhere in the range of .15-13






surfactant concentration




depends on many factors, such







as water hardness, pH, type of







fibers, etc. Normally between 0.1-







0.3% of water in circulation






forming wire tension




between 2-10N/cm






exemplary flow rate






mixer to wire pit




about 4000 liters per minute






wire pit to headbox




about 40,000 liters per minute






foam recycle conduit




about 3500 liters per minute






suction withdrawal to water recycle




about 500 liters per minute














What has heretofore been described is what is disclosed in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/923,250 filed Sep. 4, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,904,809. According to the present invention a particular manifold, and method of making a nonwoven web using the manifold, are provided which facilitate production of a nonwoven web having a substantially constant basis weight profile across the width thereof. In

FIGS. 7 and 8

components similar to those illustrated in

FIG. 4

are shown by the same reference numeral only preceded by a “1”. Other components have a reference numeral that starts with a “2”.




The manifold according to the present invention may have the construction illustrated schematically at


200


in

FIGS. 7 and 8

, though many other shapes (including cylindrical with a conical insert, curved side wall, etc.) may be used such as the substantially cylindrical shape schematically illustrated in

FIG. 12

where components comparable to those in

FIG. 8

are shown by the same two-digit reference numeral only preceded by a “3” rather than a “1” or “2”. A conical insert is normally not used where the front wall (


210


,


310


) is planar since that would make the construction too complicated and expensive.




The manifold


200


of

FIGS. 7 and 8

comprises a casing having a first end


201


with an inlet


129


, and a second end


202


, optionally with an outlet


203


leading to a manually or preferably automatically controllable valve


204


. If the inlet


129


is circular in cross-section, as illustrated in

FIG. 7

, and so is the outlet


203


, then in this preferred embodiment the manifold


200


comprises a center section


205


which is preferably a polygon based truncated prism, with a transition


206


from the circular cross-section inlet


129


to the polygon base of the center section prism


205


, and with another transition


207


from the truncated top of the prismatic center section


205


connected to the outlet


203


(if provided).




The center section


205


of the manifold


200


comprises a first side wall


208


, and a second side wall


209


. In

FIG. 7

the first side wall


208


is removed over most of the length thereof for clarity of illustration of the hollow interior and components thereof. However both of the side walls


208


,


209


preferably are substantially closed, although various openings may be provided therein for sensors, or for other purposes. The side walls


208


,


209


may be substantially planar or curved (e.g. see


308


,


309


, in FIG.


12


).




The center section


205


also comprises a front wall


210


having an effective length (which may be from one transition


206


to the other transition


203


, or some smaller part of that distance) and a back wall


193


opposite the front wall


210


. The front wall


210


is porous to the foam-fiber-surfactant slurry


211


that enters the inlet


129


, while the back wall


193


is substantially closed except for openings


212


therein through which a second foam, as indicated schematically by arrows


213


in

FIGS. 7 and 8

, may be introduced into the interior volume of the center section


205


. The back wall


193


may be substantially planar or curved (e.g. see


393


in FIG.


12


).




While for simplicity the second foam flow


213


will be described below as comprising substantially fiber-free foam, that is only a preferred embodiment and under many circumstances the use of foam containing fiber (at approximately the same percentage of fibers as the foam-fiber slurry introduced at


211


, or with a 1% or more lesser or greater percentage of fiber than that of the slurry introduced at


211


) may be used as the second foam


213


. At different points of introduction the foam streams


213


may also have different percentages of fiber.




The pipes


144


, with valves


214


therein, connected in a fluid-tight manner to the openings


212


, comprise one embodiment for introducing the substantially fiber-free foam


213


into the center section through the back wall


193


. The pipes


144


, and openings


212


, may be provided in a single row as illustrated in

FIGS. 7 and 8

, or in multiple rows, or in a wide variety of other patterns or arrays. Any other conventional fluidic elements, such as nozzles, heads, perforated plates, baffles, or the like, may be utilized as, or as part of, the means for introducing the foam


213


, but preferably the means is capable of introducing foam


213


at a wide variety of different locations along the length of the center section


205


to change the pressure conditions within the center section


205


at any one point, so as to ultimately make the basis weight of the foam-fiber-surfactant slurry passing through the front wall


210


substantially constant along the effective length thereof (e.g. with a variation of less than 0.5%, preferably as low as about 0.2% or even lower).




The pressure within the central section


205


is preferably sensed in order to ensure that the basis weight is substantially constant since the basis weight at any particular point is largely dependent upon the pressure of the foam-fiber slurry at that point. For example as illustrated schematically in

FIGS. 7 and 8

, a plurality of pressure sensors


217


may be provided associated with the side wall


208


(or with each of the side walls


208


,


209


). Alternatively the front wall


210


may be planar and the back and side walls


193


,


208


,


209


may be formed of one curved surface, preferably part of a circle or cone, as illustrated schematically in FIG.


13


. Thereby, both the pressure sensors


217


and the foam introduction ducts


144


can be placed one or more at back/side wall


15


,


193


,


208


,


209


.)




The sensors


217


may be pressure meters or any other type of conventional sensor, preferably which provides an electronic readout or pulse. Preferably the outputs from each of the sensors


217


(any number may be provided, the more that are provided typically the more uniform the basis weight will be) are electronically connected to automatic control means, shown schematically at


218


in FIG.


7


. In response to the output from the pressure sensors


217


, as well as other environmental or human induced factors, the control means


218


controls the valve


204


, the pump pumping slurry


211


to the inlet


129


(e.g. the pump


25


illustrated in FIGS.


1


and


2


), the valves


214


supplying the second foam


213


to the center section


205


, or preferably all of the valve


204


, pump


25


, and valves


214


. By controlling the valve


204


by opening it further, the pressure within the former


205


is reduced, and by closing it more the pressure in the center section


205


is increased; by increasing the pump


25


speed the pressure will be increased, and by decreasing the speed the pressure will be decreased; and by controlling the valves


214


the amount of flow at any particular point along the back wall


193


is individually controlled to thereby locally increase or decrease the pressure at that point.




In the preferred embodiment illustrated, the back wall


193


slopes with respect to the front wall


210


so that the back wall


193


becomes closer to the front wall


210


, and the cross-sectional area of the center section


205


becomes smaller, moving from adjacent the first end


201


of the manifold


200


toward the second end


202


, as is clear in FIG.


8


. Preferably the slope of the back wall


193


is substantially uniform so that the decrease in cross-sectional area is also uniform, although a non-uniform slope may be provided if balanced off by modifications of the substantially fiber-free foam introduction means, or the like.




The control means


218


may comprise any suitable conventional control means such as a fuzzy controller, a multi-variable control unit, or any other suitable computer control capable of performing the desired function of controlling valves


204


and


214


, and possibly pump


25


.





FIG. 9

is a graphical representation of the basis weight of the foam-fiber slurry passing through the front wall


210


along the length of the center section


205


. The effective length of the center section


205


is indicated by reference numeral


220


in

FIG. 9

, whereas variations of basis weight with respect to a constant


221


(typically in grams per square meter) is illustrated via line


222


. The variation in

FIG. 9

is less than 0.5% from the peak of the curve


222


above the base line


221


, to the valve below.

FIGS. 10 and 1



1


, on the other hand, have curves


223


,


224


, respectively, which result in an unsuitable product.

FIG. 10

shows a situation where an insufficient amount of slurry flows into the manifold leading to a manifold pressure that is too low at the inlet,


129


, and thus a basis weight at the left hand side of the manifold


200


as viewed in

FIG. 7

that is too low.

FIG. 11

shows an aberrant situation where too much slurry is recirculated in line


225


(e.g. back to pump


25


, or to wire pit


23


) because the valve


204


is open too far, resulting in a decrease of pressure in the manifold and the basis weight of the slurry passing through the front wall


210


to the right of the manifold


200


(as seen in

FIG. 7

) being too low.





FIG. 7

also shows the manifold


200


in schematic relationship with respect to a conventional headbox


30


; that is the manifold


200


preferably takes the place of the manifold


27


illustrated in

FIGS. 1 and 3

, and has nozzles associated therewith (like


28


and


29


in FIG.


3


), which feed the headbox


30


containing the wire


99


and with which the suction boxes


31


are associated.




In a method of utilizing the manifold


200


according to the present invention for producing a nonwoven web of fibrous material the following procedures may be practiced: (a) Substantially continuously introducing foam-fiber-surfactant slurry


211


into the first end


201


of the manifold


200


. (b) Substantially continuously discharging foam-fiber-surfactant slurry


211


through openings in the manifold front wall


210


to be delivered to the headbox


30


. And, (c) introducing a second foam


213


(substantially fiber free, or a foam-fiber slurry) into the manifold through a number of openings


212


spaced at substantially regular intervals substantially over the entire length thereof, so as to maintain the basis weight of foam-fiber-surfactant slurry passing through the manifold front wall


210


substantially constant along the effective length


220


of the manifold front wall


210


(as seen by curve


222


in FIG.


9


); e.g. so that there is a variation of 0.5% or less in the basis weight of the slurry passing through front wall


210


, and the web ultimately formed on the foramininous element


99


.




The method may also comprise (d) sensing the pressure in the manifold


200


at a plurality of positions (sensors


217


) along the length thereof, and controlling (c) in response to the sensed pressure to maintain the basis weight of the slurry passing through the front wall


210


substantially constant (preferably with a variation of less than 0.5%) along the effective length


220


of the front wall


210


. For example this is accomplished by the sensors


217


providing control signals to the control means


218


, which then controls the valves


214


as needed (and possibly the valve


204


, and also possibly the speed of the pump


25


). In the method (c) is also preferably practiced substantially continuously, although the rate of flow may be varied from one pipe


144


to the other in order to achieve a uniform pressure within the manifold center section


205


, and the slurry


211


moves through the constantly decreasing cross-section of the center section


205


(as seen in

FIG. 8

) from the inlet


129


to the outlet


203


.




The manifold


300


of

FIG. 12

has a cylindrical cross-section with conical insert


399


. In

FIG. 12

the uppermost and the lowermost structures represent the ‘front wall’


310


of the manifold having apertures and further connections to the headbox. The fiber-foam mixture


311


enters the manifold


300


from the right. The tapering part inside the manifold is the conical insert


399


corresponding to the ‘back wall’ of the manifold. I.e. both have circular cross section. As shown the second foam


313


enters the conical insert


399


via a plurality of pipes


344


terminating into an opening at the conical “back wall”


393


. The pressure sensors


317


may be located in the “side” wall


309


. Further, it should be noted that the manifold


300


could be conical, and the insert (


399


) cylindrical, or both conical. Other cross sections than cylindrical could also be used, for instance elliptical cross sections, or the configuration of

FIG. 13

in which the surface


408


,


409


,


493


is curved and preferably a bisected cone [in

FIG. 13

components comparable to those of

FIGS. 7

,


8


and


12


are shown by the same two digit number only preceded by a “4”].




It is the primary object of the present invention to provide highly advantageous modifications of the foam-laid process. While the invention has been herein shown and described in what is presently conceived to be the most practical and preferred embodiment thereof it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many modifications may be made thereof within the scope of the invention, which scope is to be accorded the broadest interpretation of the appended claims so as to encompass all equivalent methods and assemblies.



Claims
  • 1. A method of producing a nonwoven web of fibrous material, using a manifold having a front porous wall having an effective length through which foam-fiber slurry flow out of the manifold, first and second ends adjacent the front porous wall and separated along the effective length, and a back wall adjacent the first and second ends and opposing the front wall; and a headbox downstream of the front porous wall; said method comprising:(a) substantially continously introducing foam-fiber-surfactant slurry into the first end of the manifold; (b) substantially continously discharging foam-fiber-surfactant slurry through openings in the manifold front wall to be delivered to the headbox; and (c) introducing a second foam into the manifold through a number of openings spaced at substantially regular intervals over the entire length thereof, so as to maintain the basis weight of foam-fiber-surfactant slurry passing through the manfold front wall substantially constant along the effective length of the manifold front wall.
  • 2. A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising (d) sensing a pressure in the manifold at a plurality of positions along the length thereof, and practicing (c) in response to the sensed pressure to maintain the basis weight of foam-fiber slurry passing through the front wall with a variation of less than 0.5% along the effective length of the front wall.
  • 3. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein the manifold has a valved outlet at the second end thereof; and further comprising (e) automatically controlling the valve of the outlet to control the amount of slurry flowing out of the outlet; and wherein (c) is practiced by controlling valves in pipes feeding the second foam through the back wall center section between the first and second ends thereof with a substantially polygonal cross-section that gradually decreases substantially along the effective length of the front wall; and wherein (c) is practiced so that the foam-fiber-surfactant slurry moves through the constantly decreasing cross-section of a center section.
  • 4. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein (c) is practiced substantially continuously.
  • 5. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein (c) is practiced to introduce substantially fiber-free foam as the second foam.
  • 6. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein (c) is practiced to introduce a foam-fiber slurry as the second foam.
  • 7. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein (c) is practiced to introduce a foam-fiber slurry having approximately the same percentage of fibers as the foam-fiber slurry introduced in (a).
  • 8. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein (c) is practiced to introduce a foam-fiber slurry having a different, by at least about 1%, percentage of fibers as the foam-fiber slurry introduced in (a).
Parent Case Info

This application is a division of application Ser. No. 09/257,239, filed Feb. 25, 1999, which was abandoned on Jun. 18, 2001.

US Referenced Citations (11)
Number Name Date Kind
3716449 Gatward et al. Feb 1973 A
3871952 Robertson Mar 1975 A
3937273 Radvan et al. Feb 1976 A
3938782 Robertson Feb 1976 A
4049491 Brandon et al. Sep 1977 A
4443297 Cheshire et al. Apr 1984 A
4686006 Cheshire et al. Aug 1987 A
4944843 Wallace et al. Jul 1990 A
5011575 Keller Apr 1991 A
5853545 Haraldsson Dec 1998 A
5904809 Rökman May 1999 A