The invention relates to a sprinkler having a cage for generating fire-fighting foam from a fire-fighting fluid (for example water) containing foaming agent for fighting fires.
Fire-fighting foam is composed substantially of air, water, and a foaming agent containing surfactant. In terms of the foaming agent containing surfactant, the fire-fighting foam in foams that contain fluorine surfactant (′AFFF′ or ‘A3F’ foam fire-fighting agents) and fire-fighting foam that is free from fluorine surfactant can be differentiated, the different modes of action of which will be briefly explained hereunder.
In the use of AFFF foaming agents, the fluorine surfactants by virtue of the chemical structure thereof that differs from that of conventional hydrocarbon surfactants cause a vapour-tight aqueous liquid film of typically 10-30 μm in thickness between the burning surface and the foam. This water film that is caused by fluorine surfactant acts as a barrier to the exit of vapours of burnt material and suppresses any reigniting. By virtue of these properties, AFFF foaming agents are also referred to as ‘film-forming foams’, this being reflected in the acronym thereof of ‘AFFF’ or ‘A3F’ for ‘Aqueous Film Forming Foam’. A further substantial advantage that is linked to the film formation lies in that the foam layer that is bearing on the film does not have to display any outstanding barrier function, that is to say that the fire-fighting foam needs to have only a minor expansion ratio or none at all. In practice, effective fire-fighting using AFFF foaming agents with an expansion ratio of less than 4, typically between 1.5 and 3.0, is therefore adequate, since the major fire-fighting effect is caused by the gas-tight liquid film on the burning surface that is caused by fluorine surfactant. These low expansion ratios mentioned above are achieved by using conventional sprinklers that are conceived for operating with water or AFFF fire-fighting agents. However, these conventional sprinklers by virtue of the construction mode thereof cannot achieve any higher expansion ratio. To this end, one must resort to special sprinklers that are technically complex, for example in the construction mode of a heavy-foam sprinkler such as disclosed in DE 195 39 991 C1, said special sprinklers being approximately 40% to 70% more expensive and are significantly more complex in terms of the construction than the conventional sprinklers.
Heavy-foam sprinklers of this type are installed in particular where AFFF fire-fighting foams by virtue of the damaging properties of the fluorine surfactant component (persistent, bio-accumulative, toxic) must not be used, or where conventional sprinklers that previously have been operated with AFFF fire-fighting foam have to be converted to heavy-foam sprinklers by virtue of the ban on fluorine surfactants. To this end, please refer to the application restrictions of guideline 2006/122/EG. Since fire-fighting foam that is free from fluorine surfactant lacks the film barrier on account of the absence of the fluorine surfactants, the necessary barrier function is thus assigned to substantially only the foam layer. However, the barrier function is only effective at an expansion ratio of 4 and above, at which point said foam is usually referred to as heavy foam, requiring the use of special heavy-foam sprinklers as mentioned above.
An object of the present disclosure is to solve the conflict of objectives as illustrated above, that is to say
This object is achieved by a cage having the features according to the appended independent claims, said cage complementing conventional sprinklers as mentioned above and permitting conventional sprinklers with an inadequate expansion ratio of typically less than 4 to be converted to heavy-foam sprinklers in a simple manner. Advantageous embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the dependent claims. In detail:
The cage according to the invention is a complementary part for a conventional sprinkler and serves for generating fire-fighting foam from a fire-fighting fluid containing foaming agent. The conventional sprinkler comprises a fire-fighting fluid exit opening, a spray plate, opposite the fire-fighting fluid exit opening in the axial direction, and sprays the fire-fighting fluid across the spray plate at an expansion ratio which without the cage according to the invention is significantly below that of heavy foam (the latter starting at an expansion ratio of 4). Umbrella sprinklers of this construction type mentioned in an exemplary manner include the Victaulic umbrella sprinkler V2704 (K80) and the Tyco umbrella sprinkler TY315 (K80). In the case of sprinklers of this conventional type, a cylindrical intermediate space that is formed between the base area (G) of the spray plate and the fire-fighting fluid exit opening can be defined, the diameter of said intermediate space corresponding to the external diameter (d1) of the spray plate, and the height (h1) of said intermediate space, measured from the centre of the base area (G), corresponding to the spacing from the fire-fighting fluid exit opening. According to the invention, the cage that is provided for sprinklers of this construction type has screen openings having a diameter between 1.00 mm and 7.00 mm and/or lattice openings having a width between 1.00 and 7.00 mm and a length between 2.00 mm and 9.00 mm, preferably formed by an expanded lattice, said screen openings and lattice openings permitting the fire-fighting fluid flow passing through the cage, in conjunction with the specific dimensions of said cage, to be upgraded to form heavy foam. An expanded metal (non-deburred) is particularly suitable as the expanded cage, because the sharp edges of the material cause particularly good foaming. The dimensions which are also adapted to the sprinkler permit the cage according to the invention to encase the sprinkler intermediate space mentioned above, wherein the height (h2) of the cage corresponds to at least 0.20 times the external diameter (d1) of the spray plate.
Furthermore, the internal diameter (d2) of the cage, alternatively the non-circular minimum spacing between the opposite internal sides of the cage, at the level of the spray plate, corresponds to at least the external diameter (d1) of the spray plate in the installed state. To the extent that the cage according to the invention by way of the internal side thereof does not bear directly on the spray plate in a radial manner, that is to say that a clear dimension (b) can be defined as the intermediate space, according to one preferred embodiment of the invention this clear dimension (radial space) between the internal side of the cage (1) and the spray plate (4), at the level of the spray plate, in an encircling manner is between 0.10 to 3.00 times, preferably between 0.50 to 2.00 times, further preferably between 0.75 to 1.50 times, most preferably between 1.00 and 1.25 times the external diameter (d1) of the spray plate. The invention has recognized that the radial spacing between the cage and the spray plate has a direct influence on the expansion ratio and thus can be advantageously variable. Comparative tests have demonstrated that the expansion ratio increases as the spacing increases. Particularly advantageous herein is spacing of 0.75 to 1.50 times the external diameter (d1) of the spray plate, at which particularly advantageous expansion ratios of 4-7 are set and the foam is still sufficiently homogenous (by contrast to foam having higher expansion ratios caused by a larger spacing).
The cage advantageously has a height which permits the majority of the fire-fighting fluid that has been deflected by the spray plate to be directed through the cage according to the invention. This height (h2) of the cage is advantageously at least 0.50 times, preferably 0.75 times, furthermore preferably 1.00 times the external diameter (d1) of the spray plate, and can correspond to the height (h1) of the sprinkler intermediate space, for example. Proceeding from the height (h1) of the sprinkler intermediate space, the height (h2) of the cage according to one preferred embodiment can be defined such that said height (h2) corresponds to the height (h1) of the sprinkler intermediate space, preferably corresponds to less than 0.75 times the height (h1) of the sprinkler intermediate space, furthermore preferably corresponds to less than 0.50 times the height (h1) of the sprinkler intermediate space.
The cage according to the invention can have any suitable shape, for example the shape of a hollow cylinder, of a hollow cone, of a hollow truncated cone, of a hollow pyramid, of a hollow sphere, of a hollow polygon such as a pentagon, hexagon or octagon, or a combination of these shapes, wherein the hollow cylindrical shape is particularly preferred. Furthermore, the cage can extend in a tapered manner in the axial direction beyond that region of said cage that encases the intermediate space, and for example open into an opening that has an internal diameter which is larger than the external diameter (d1) of the spray plate. An opening with an internal diameter larger than the external diameter (d1) of the spray plate is of particular advantage in order to enable small parts of the triggering elements that are typically used (bursting elements with a liquid, soldered strut, etc.) to drop out of the sprinkler in an unencumbered manner, said small parts otherwise being caught in the cage and compromising the screen or lattice openings in the intended functioning thereof as expansion elements. According to one particularly preferred embodiment, the cage is shaped as a hollow cylinder, the (upper) end of the hollow cylinder that faces the fire-fighting fluid exit opening being open across the entire diameter area, while the opposite end at the level of the spray plate tapers in an axial manner and defines an opening below the spray plate.
According to one preferred embodiment of the invention, the cage lattice openings are non-circular and have a width between 2.00 mm and 6.00 mm and a length between 3.00 mm and 8.00 mm, preferably a width between 2.50 mm and 4.50 mm and a length between 5.00 mm and 7.00 mm. Furthermore, the cage lattice can advantageously be an expanded lattice having a mesh width between 2.50 mm and 4.50 mm, a mesh length of 5.00 mm to 7.00 mm and a thickness of 0.40 mm to 0.80 mm, preferably a mesh width of 3.50 mm, a mesh length of 6.00 mm, and a thickness of 0.60 mm. According to one further preferred embodiment of the invention, the cage may be constructed of screen having screen openings having a minimum diameter of 1.50 mm to 2.50 mm, preferably 1.75 mm to 2.25 mm, particularly preferably of 2.00 mm. The cage is preferably made from metal, for example steel, and particularly preferably from stainless steel (for example V2A stainless steel).
According to one preferred embodiment of the invention, the cage furthermore has a mounting for fastening the cage to the sprinkler. This mounting can be configured as a plurality of retaining arms, for example, which fasten the cage to the base of the sprinkler in the region of the fire-fighting fluid exit opening on the sprinkler body or on the connection thread of said sprinkler disposed thereabove, for example by way of a plurality (for example 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6) clamping feet. The retaining arms or clamping feet, respectively, for easier crumpling can be provided with predetermined breaking points, in order for positioning of the cage in relation to the sprinkler to be able to be performed in a simple manner depending on the sprinkler and the installation conditions. In order for the retaining arms or the clamping feet, respectively, to have a secure footing on the sprinkler, said retaining arms or clamping feet, respectively, can additionally be secured by way of a securing element, for example a tying element (cable tie, metal strap, etc.) that encompasses the retaining arms or clamping feet in a radial manner.
As has been mentioned at the outset, the cage according to the invention is particularly suitable for conventional umbrella sprinklers which can be upgraded or retrofitted, respectively, with the aid of the cage in order to achieve higher expansion ratios. This applies in particular to foaming-agent containing fire-fighting fluids that are free from fluorine surfactant, in the case of which the advantage of the cage becomes particularly pertinent. In the case of these conventional sprinklers, fire-fighting foam with an expansion ratio of 3 to 9, preferably of 4-8, furthermore preferably of 4.5 to 7, particularly preferably of 5-6, can preferably be generated by way of the cage according to the invention.
A set of parts that can be used as a conversion kit or a functional group which apart from the sprinkler comprises the above-described cage according to the disclosure is furthermore the subject matter of the appended claims. The sprinkler per se is known from the prior art and comprises a fire-fighting fluid exit opening and a spray plate, opposite the fire-fighting fluid exit opening in the axial direction, as has already been described in more detail above in the context of the cage. According to one preferred embodiment of the invention, the arrangement of the set or of the functional group is such the cage surrounds the intermediate space that is formed on the base area (G) of the spray plate such that the base area (G) of the spray plate is aligned with the lower side of the cage that faces away from the fire-fighting fluid exit opening.
The use of the above-described cage, set, or the functional group according to the invention for generating fire-fighting foam from a fire-fighting fluid containing foaming agent, and a method for generating fire-fighting foam from a fire-fighting fluid containing foaming agent are furthermore the subject matter of the invention. The method comprises the steps of providing a fire-fighting fluid containing foaming agent, and a functional group as has been explained above, and conveying the fire-fighting fluid that has been deflected out of the fire-fighting fluid exit opening and by the spray plate through the cage according to the invention, wherein the fire-fighting foam is created from the fire-fighting fluid as the fire-fighting fluid passes through the cage.
The present invention will be described in more detail hereunder by means of the appended examples and figures.
The following sprinklers without (
As expected, the conventional sprinkler (
The invention is explained below with reference to the attached drawings. In the drawings:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2016 212 391 | Jul 2016 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3797746 | Gray | Mar 1974 | A |
5447338 | Kikuchi | Sep 1995 | A |
5893418 | Ponte | Apr 1999 | A |
6484809 | Elder | Nov 2002 | B1 |
20070256844 | Blasing | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090151962 | de Ris | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100243283 | Green | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19539991 | Feb 1997 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180064974 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |