FOAMED INJECTION MOULDED ARTICLE

Abstract
The invention is directed to a foamed injection moulded article comprising a foam composition obtained by foaming high density polyethylene having a quotient of melt strength and apparent viscosity >2 cN/K·Pa·s wherein the melt strength is determined as described in ISO 16790:2005 and the apparent viscosity is determined as described in ISO 11443:2014.
Description

The invention relates to a foamed injection moulded article comprising polyethylene foam.


The production of foamed injection moulded articles may take place via an injection moulding (IM) process. Injection moulding is a manufacturing process for producing parts by injecting material into a mould. Injection moulding can be performed with a broad range of materials, for example HDPE. Material for the part is fed into a heated barrel, mixed, and forced into a mould cavity, where it cools and hardens to the configuration of the cavity. For foamed injection moulding one can choose for chemical foaming or physical foaming. For chemical foaming a chemical blowing agent with or without a nucleating agent is added to the polymer and for physical foaming the most commonly used technique is MuCell® technology in which physical foaming involves injection moulding machine with gas charging. A plasticizing unit with a specially designed screw is an important feature of the system. The gas is injected directly into the plastic melt in the form of a super critical fluid from which the screw produces a homogeneous single-phase solution. A non-return valve prevents the gas/melt mixture expanding prematurely towards the feed end, and the machine's shut-off nozzle blocks the melt at the front end. Most commonly nitrogen or CO2 are used as physical blowing agent. Examples of foam injection moulded products Include pallets, crates, bins, boxes, pails and trays.


Rodrigue et al. published in ‘Blowing agents and foaming processes 2007” (22-23 May 2007 Frankfurt-Germany) an article directed to injection moulded HDPE structural foams.


Polyethylene foams are described in Ullmann's Encyclopedia “Foamed Plastics” by Heinz Weber et al. (2002; Wiley VCH Verlag). These foams are classified as low density and high density foams. These foams may be non-crosslinked or crosslinked foams. Most polyolefin foams and most polyethylene foams are made from low density polyethylene (LDPE). Polyolefin foam may be produced via a chemical blowing process or via a physically blowing process. An important polyolefin foam is physically blown polyethylene foam which is commonly produced with blowing agents for example nitrogen, carbon dioxide, isobutane, pentane and cyclopentane.


The transport industry as a whole is facing several key challenges such as for example rising energy and transport costs leading to additional margin pressures, stringent recycling targets putting pressure on the transport industry and growing public pressure to reduce excessive use of materials and energy. These goals can be obtained by making lower weight pallets, crates and boxes.


The object of the present invention is to produce injection moulded HDPE articles with reduced weight compared to compact HDPE injection moulded articles for example pallets, crates, bins, boxes, pails ,trays and many other injection moulded products produced via injection moulding. The articles must also show the desired values for mechanical properties such as for example flexural rigidity.


The foamed injection moulded article according to the invention comprises a foam composition obtained by foaming high density polyethylene (HDPE) having a quotient of melt strength and apparent viscosity >2 cN/k·Pa·s wherein the melt strength is determined as described in ISO 16790:2005 and the apparent viscosity is determined as described in ISO 11443:2014.


The melt strength is determined as described in ISO 16790:2005 using a capillary rheometer with a drawing device that pulls the molten polymer from the capillary die at a constant flow rate and at Increasing drawing velocity. The capillary rheometer is operated at a temperature of 190° C. The preheating time is 300 seconds. The piston speed is 0.049 mm/s and the barrel diameter is 12 mm as a consequence the throughput is 5.5 mm3/s and the apparent shear rate is 7 s−1. The capillary has a length of 40 mm and a diameter of 2 mm and an entrance angle of 180° (fiat). The take-off wheels operate at an initial speed of 1.8 mm/s and an acceleration of 1.2 mm/s2. The melt strength is the maximum value of the drawing force which is usually realized at break of the extrudate.


The apparent viscosity is determined as described In ISO 11443:2014 using the same capillary rheometer and the same test conditions as described above for the determination of the melt strength. The apparent viscosity [Pa·s] Is defined as the quotient of the apparent shear stress and the apparent shear rate.


Preferably the high density polyethylene (HDPE) has

    • MI (melt index) in the range between ≥0.01 and ≤50
    • density in the range between ≥930 and ≤985 kg/m3and
    • a gel fraction less than 5%.


According to a preferred embodiment of the invention the high density polyethylene (HDPE) has

    • MI in the range between ≥0.01 and ≤50
    • density in the range between ≥930 and ≤985 kg/m3and
    • a gel fraction less than 5% and the high density polyethylene (HDPE) has been obtained by chain branching high density polyethylene (HDPE) having
    • MI in the range between ≥1 and ≤100 and
    • density in the range between ≥930 and ≤985 kg/m3 .
    • MI (melt index) is measured according ISO1133-1:2011 at a temperature of 190° C. at a load of 2.16 kg.


The density is measured at a temperature of 23° C. according ISO1183-1:2012.


The gel content or gel fraction is determined according to ASTM D2765-11.


Generally, modifying by chain branching may be performed by electron beam irradiation, peroxide treatment, silane crosslinking, reactive extrusion or branching in the reactor. According to the present invention the chain branching takes place by irradiation.


According to a preferred embodiment of the invention irradiation takes place via electron beam irradiation, X-ray irradiation or gamma irradiation.


According to a further preferred embodiment of the invention irradiation takes place via electron beam irradiation.


EB irradiation is discussed in for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,508,319A, U.S. Pat. No. 5,552,104A, and by Keizo Makuuchi and Song Cheng, in Irradiation Processing of Polymer Materials and Its Industrial Applications (ISBN 978-0-470-58769-0, John Wiley & Sons, 2012).


According to a preferred embodiment of the invention the foam injection moulded article has a total density between 100 and 750 kg/m3. The total density of the injection molded article is the total density of the compact skin and the foamed core.


Preferably the article comprises two compact skins and a foamed core between the two compact skins. The foamed core between the two compact skins is a foamed polyethylene layer.


Preferably the compact skin comprises polyethylene with a density in the range between 930 and 985 kg/m3.


Preferably the foam core comprises polyethylene having a quotient of melt strength and apparent viscosity >2 cN/k·Pa·s


Preferably the density of the polyethylene foam layer ranges between ≥100 and ≤600 kg/m3.


More preferably the density of the polyethylene foam layer is ≤500 kg/m3.


The density depends amongst others of the selection and amount of the blowing agent.


Suitable examples of the foam injection moulded article include pallets, crates, bins, boxes, pails, trays and injection moulded automotive parts.


The article according to the invention results in a weight reduction of more than 20%, while the flexural rigidity remains on the same level or is improved relative to a compact system comprising no foam layer. Other additional advantages include for example improved thermal insulation properties and excellent recyclability relative to crosslinked HDPE articles.


Generally the HDPE to be foamed has a value for the quotient of melt strength and apparent viscosity ≤30 cN/k·Pa·s.


Preferably the melt strength of polyethylene is ≥10 cN.


According to another preferred embodiment of the invention the HDPE to be foamed has a value for the quotient of melt strength and apparent viscosity >3 cN/k·Pa·s and more preferably >5 cN/k·Pa·s.


The melt index (MI) of the HDPE to be foamed ranges between ≥0.01 and ≤50 (measured according ISO1133-1:2011 at a temperature of 190° C. and at a load of 2.16 kg).


According to a preferred embodiment of the invention the HDPE foam composition for the foamed core has been obtained by foaming HDPE with characteristics

    • MI in the range between ≥0.01 and ≤50
    • density in the range between ≥930 and ≤985 kg/m3 and
    • a gel fraction less than 5% which has been obtained by chain branching HDPE with characteristics
    • MI in the range between ≥1 and ≤100 and
    • density in the range between a ≥930 and ≤985 kg/m3

      HDPE with increased melt strength is obtained by branching HDPE.


According to a preferred embodiment of the invention the HDPE foam composition has been obtained by foaming HDPE with characteristics

    • MI in the range between a ≥0.01 and ≤10
    • density in the range between a ≥930 and ≤985 kg/m3and
    • a gel fraction less than 5% which has been obtained by chain branching HDPE with characteristics
    • MI in the range between a ≥7 and ≤100 and
    • density in the range between a ≥930 and ≤985 kg/m3


According to a further preferred embodiment of the invention the HDPE foam composition has been obtained by foaming HDPE with characteristics

    • MI in the range between a ≥0.1 and ≤10
    • density in the range between ≥935 and ≤970 kg/m3
    • a gel fraction less than 5% which has been obtained by chain branching HDPE with characteristics
    • MI in the range between a ≥10 and ≤100 and
    • density in the range between ≥935 and ≤970 kg/m3 .


According to another preferred embodiment of the invention the HDPE foam composition has been obtained by foaming HDPE with characteristics

    • MI in the range between a ≥0.1 and ≤10
    • density in the range between a ≥940 and ≤970 kg/m3 and
    • a gel fraction less than 3% which has been obtained by chain branching HDPE with characteristics
    • MI in the range between ≥12 and ≤50 and
    • density in the range between a ≥940 and ≤970 kg/m3


According to another preferred embodiment of the invention the HDPE foam composition has been obtained by foaming HDPE with characteristics

    • MI in the range between ≥0.1 and ≤10
    • density in the range between ≥945 and ≤965 kg/m3 and
    • a gel fraction less than 2% which has been obtained by chain branching HDPE with characteristics
    • MI in the range between ≥12 and ≤50 and
    • density in the range between ≥945 and ≤965 kg/m3


Suitable HDPE can be produced by chromium/silica catalysts, Ziegler-Natta catalysts or metallocene catalysts.


Preferably the compact layers on the outside are made with the same raw material. Preferably the polymer in the outer compact skin layers is HDPE. Due to differences In cooling rate between the outside and the inside of the product, the outside is compact and the inside is porous.


According to a preferred embodiment of the Invention the ratio between foam layer thickness and total thickness between 0.20 and 0.95.


More preferably the ratio between the thickness of the foam core layer and the total thickness is between 0.40 and 0.90.


Most preferably the ratio between the thickness of the foam core layer and the total thickness is between 0.60 and 0.80.


The selected thickness ratio is dependent of both the desired application and the density of the foam core layer.


The foam has 50-80% closed cells, preferably more than 90% closed cells.


The HDPE injection moulded foamed part may be produced via a chemical blowing process or via a physically blowing process of the HDPE.


The HDPE injection moulded foamed part can be produced for example with physical injection moulding foaming as described for example in U.S. Pat. No. 6,169,122B1.


The foam injection moulded HDPE has a closed cell structure, a narrow cell size distribution, a low foam density and good flexural rigidity.


The density of the foamed low-density core is reduced by a factor of 2 to 3 compared to compact HDPE and the flexural rigidity of the multilayer system is increased by more than a factor 2, preferably even more than a factor 6.


A weight reduction of a ≥20% results in a high sustainability score, because less polymer is used for a specific application and less polymer is wasted.


It is possible to combine the polyethylene according to the invention with small amounts of polyethylene to obtain the desired results in case the mixture has a quotient of melt strength and apparent viscosity >2 cN/k·Pa·s.


HDPE foam composition is obtained by foaming HDPE with said specific characteristics at a specific temperature in the presence of a physical blowing agent.


Requirements for physical foaming of polyolefin compositions are disclosed in “How to choose a polyolefin grade for physical foaming ‘by Henk Ruinaart (Blowing agents and foaming processes 2005; Stuttgart Germany 10-11 May 2005).


The foaming conditions in, the physical foaming process depend in part on the applied polymer. Generally, the temperature is close to the crystallisation temperature of the polymer.


The HDPE foam composition may comprise cell stabilizers selected from for example glycerol monostearate (GMS), glycerol monopalmitate (GMP), glycol di-stearate (GDS), palmitides and/or amides for example stearyl stearamide, palmitamide and/or stearamide.


The HDPE foam composition may also comprise a nucleating agent. Suitable nucleating agents include for example an amide, an amine, an ester of an aliphatic (C10-C24) carboxylic acid, talcum, micro talcum and a mixture of sodium bicarbonate and citric acid. The acid may be a saturated or unsaturated acid.


Suitable physical blowing agents include for example isobutane, CO2, pentane, butane, nitrogen, isobutane with CO2, nitrogen or pure CO2 and/or a fluorohydrocarbon. Suitable chemical blowing agents for nucleation of polyethylene foam include for example exothermic chemical blowing agents and mixtures such as for example sodium hydrogen carbonate and citric acid derivatives (3-carboxy-3-hydroxypentane-1,5-dioic acid; C6H8O7) and endo thermic blowing agents and mixtures such as for example azo-di-carbon-amide), hydrazo dicarbonamide, 4. 4′-oxybis (benzenesulfonyl hydrazide), N,N-dinitroso pentamethylene tetramine 5-phenylletrazole), p-toluene sulfonyl hydrazide and p-toluene sulphonyl semicarbazide. These blowing agents may be milled to very fine powders or may be added to finely milled carriers like calcium carbonate or talcum to improve their nucleating efficiency.


The HDPE foam composition may additionally contain other additives such as for example foam nucleating agents , flame retardants, pigments, lubricants, flow promoters, antistatic agents, processing stabilizers, long term stabilisers and/or UV stabilizers. The additives may be present in any desired amount to be determined by the man skilled in the art. These additives may be added pure or as a masterbatch before mixing this masterbatch with the polymer to be foamed.


Preferably the HDPE foam composition comprises HDPE as described in the foregoing and a blowing agent wherein the total density of the HDPE foamed article ranges between ≥100 and ≤750 kg/m3.


Preferably the HDPE foam composition is obtained with a physically foaming process at a temperature between 120° C. and 140° C. with use of isobutane, isobutane with CO2, nitrogen or pure CO2 as the physical blowing agent.







According to a preferred embodiment of the invention the foamed injection moulded article comprises a foam composition obtained by foaming high density polyethylene (HDPE) having a quotient of melt strength and apparent viscosity >2 cN/k·Pa·s wherein the melt strength is determined as described in ISO 16790:2005 using a capillary rheometer with a drawing device that pulls the molten polymer from the capillary die at a constant flow rate and at increasing drawing velocity wherein the capillary rheometer is operated at a temperature of 190° C., the preheating time is 300 seconds, the piston speed is 0.049 mm/s ,the barrel diameter is 12 mm, the capillary has a length of 40 mm , the diameter is 2 mm and the entrance angle is 180° (flat), the take-off wheels operate at an initial speed of 1.8 mm/s and an acceleration of 1.2 mm/s2and the apparent viscosity is determined as described in ISO 11443:2014 using the same capillary rheometer and the same test conditions as for the determination of the melt strength and wherein the apparent viscosity [Pa·s] is defined as the quotient of the apparent shear stress and the apparent shear rate and wherein the high density polyethylene (HDPE) has

    • MI (melt Index) In the range between ≥0.01 and ≤50
    • density in the range between ≥930 ands ≤985 kg/m3and
    • a gel fraction less than 5%.


and the high density polyethylene (HDPE) has been obtained by chain branching, preferably electron beam Irradiation , high density polyethylene (HDPE) having

    • MI in the range between ≥1 and ≤100 and
    • density in the range between ≥930 and ≤985 kg/m3.


WO 9824836 discloses an article of manufacture comprising a foamed high density polyethylene wherein said polyethylene, prior to foaming, has a density of at least 0.93 g/cc, a melt strength of 5 to 20 grams and a melt viscosity, at 0.1 rad/s, of 4 to 10 (kPa·s); wherein after foaming, the density of the foamed polyethylene is at least 20% less than said at least 0.93 g/cc density. WO 9824836 does not disclose or indicate values for the apparent viscosity. The melt viscosity at 0.1 rad/s of HDPE according to the present invention is higher than 10 kPa·s.


WO 0064967 is directed to a process for forming articles consisting of foamed HDPE having an original density, prior to foaming, of at least 0.94 g/cc, comprising treating said HDPE, prior to foaming, with a peroxide. This process provides a peroxide treated high density polyethylene (whereas in contrast the present invention is directed to an irradiated high density polyethylene). HDPE has a low shear viscosity which is at least about 1.25 times the viscosity of the untreated HDPE measured at 0.1 rad./sec. and a high shear viscosity which is less than about 3.0 times the viscosity of the untreated HDPE measured at 100 rad./sec; admixing the peroxide treated HDPE with a blowing agent; and foaming the peroxide treated HDPE to form a closed cell foam product which exhibits a density reduction, as a result of foaming of over 20%. As shown by the comparative example the quotient of the melt strength and apparent viscosity is less than 2 cN/k·Pa·s. HDPE foam made with peroxide modified HDPE according to WO 0064967 has a higher density and a higher open cell content then HDPE foam made with HDPE according to the present invention.


The invention will be elucidated by means of the following non-restrictive examples.


EXAMPLES

Electron beam irradiation of HDPE granules was carried out at using a 10 MeV Rhodotron. In order to improve the homogeneity of irradiation dose, HDPE was packed into bags of 600×450×100 mm3 containing 12.5 kg HDPE granules. The 100 mm thick bags were radiated with the target irradiation dose on two sides in order to further improve the homogeneity of the irradiation dose.


The irradiated HDPE was characterized by the following measurements:


The melt strength was measured according ISO 16790:2005 using a Göttfert Rheograph 6000 In combination with a Rheotens 71.97. The equipment specifications are:

    • Oven diameter of 12 mm.
    • Capillary 40/2 (l/d), length 40 mm, diameter 2 mm, entrance angle 180° (flat).
    • Pressure transducer: max 200 bar.


The test conditions were as follows: the rheograph was filled in less than one minute and the sample preheating time was 300 seconds. The measuring temperature was 190° C. The speed of the piston was 0.049 mm/s corresponding to a throughput of 5.5 mm3/s and apparent shear-rate of 7 s−1. The drawing device (Rheotens 71.97) was operated at an acceleration of 1.2 mm/s2 and a velocity of 1.8 mm/s. The melt strength is expressed in cN.


The apparent viscosity was measured according ISO11443:2014 using the Göttfert Rheograph 6000 and the test conditions being described for the determination of the melt strength. The apparent viscosity is defined as the quotient of the apparent shear stress and the apparent shear rate being 7 s−1. The apparent shear stress is calculated from pressure drop [kPa] times the capillary diameter in mm divided by 4 times the length of the capillary in mm. The apparent shear rate (1/s) is calculated from the throughput (mm/s) divided by 6.28 times the diameter (mm) to the power of 3. The apparent viscosity is usually expressed in kPa·s.


The melt index was measured according ISO1133-1:2011 at a temperature of 190° C. and at 2.16 kg.


The density of the compression moulded HDPE disks was measured at a temperature of 23° C. according to ISO1183-1:2012 after at least one day of conditioning.


SABIC HDPE type CC3054 with a melt index of 27.5 (190° C., 216 kg) is used as a raw material. Table 1 and Table 2 show characteristics of electron beam irradiated HDPE type CC3054 (HDPE I, HDPE II) as compared to the values for unmodified HDPE type CC 3054 (HDPE A) and HOPE type 3H671 (HDPE B).









TABLE 1







Characteristics of electron beam irradiated HDPE (HDPE I,


HDPE II) and comparative examples (HDPE A and HDPE B)












Irradiation






dose
Melt index
Density
Gel fraction


HDPE resin
kGy
(190° C., 2.16 kg)
kg/m3
%














HDPE I
30
1.8
950
0.8


HDPE II
40
0.4
950
1.0


HDPE A
0
27.5
953
n.a.


HDPE B
0
2.1
954
n.a.
















TABLE 2







Melt strength and apparent viscosity of electron


beam irradiated HDPE (HDPE I, HDPE II) and


comparative examples (HDPE A and HDPE B)















Ratio between melt



Irradiation

Apparent
strength and



dosis
Melt strength
viscosity
apparent viscosity


HDPE resin
kGy
cN
kPa · s
cN/kPa · s














HDPE I
30
15.4
2.9
5.3


HDPE II
40
13.9
2.5
5.6


HDPE A
0
0.2
0.32
0.63


HDPE B
0
1.2
2.5
0.5










Injection moulding foaming of HDPE was carried using an injection moulding machine type Engel DUO 1350H-1350M-450 with MuCell technology for foaming. This machine was equipped with a Variotherm; the mould can be heated and cooled down in a controlled manner during an injection cycle. Furthermore the mould can be opened after the injection phase of the process. The foam injection moulded plate produced on this machine has a length of 400 mm, a width of 200 mm and a minimal thickness of 3 mm with upstanding edges. The technical machine specifications are given in Table 3.









TABLE 3







Injection moulding machine specification


for Engel DUO 450 Combi M











Parameter
Unit
Value







Injection unit with MuCell technology





Single Screw diameter
mm
60



L/D ratio

24



Maximum injection volume
cm3
450



Maximum injection pressure
bar
1800



Maximum processing temperature
° C.
450



Clamping force
kN
4500



Clamping unit

Hydraulic



Minimum dimension
mm
400



Maximum dimension
mm
1200










Talc is added as a nucleating agent. Nitrogen is used as physical blowing agent. Hydrocerol is used as both a chemical blowing agent and a nucleating agent. Table 4 provides information with respect to additives.









TABLE 4







Nucleating agent and blowing agents.










Chemical



Commercial name
name
Master batch













Schulman
Talc
50% in LDPE
Nucleating agent


PBHFPE50T


Clariant ITP473
Hydrocerol
65% in LDPE
Nucleating agent


N2
Nitrogen

Physical blowing





agent


Clariant CF40E
Hydrocerol
40% in LDPE
Chemical blowing





agent









Table 5, and Table 6 show the machine settings for respectively physical foaming and chemical foaming of mould HDPE.









TABLE 5







Machine settings for injection moulding foaming using MuCell


technology (physical foaming), Variotherm and mould opening


















Comparative
Comparative


Parameter
Unit
Example I
Example II
Example III
Example A
Example B





HDPE
type
HDPE I
HDPE I
HDPE II
HDPE A
HDPE B


Nitrogen
weight %
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.15
0.3


Talc
weight %
2
2
2
2
2


ITP473
weight %
0
1
1
1
1


Melt temperature
° C.
210
210
210
210
200


Dosing volume
cm3
400
400
400
400
400


Injection time
s
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.5


Active cooling
s
10
10
10
10
10


started


Cooling time in
s
60
60
60
60
60


mould


Delay time (time
s
1
1
1
1
1


to mould opening)


Variotherm hot
° C.
120
120
120
120
110


Variotherm cold
° C.
40
40
40
30
40
















TABLE 6







Machine settings for injection moulding foaming


using a chemical blowing agent (CF40E) and a fixed


cold mould (no Variotherm, no mould opening).













Comparative


Parameter
Unit
Example V
Example C





HDPE
type
HDPE I
HDPE A


CF40E
weight %
2.0
2.0


Melt temperature
° C.
220
220


Dosing volume
cm3
500
500


Injection time
s
0.75
0.75


Cooling time in mould
s
160
160









The total density of the foam injection moulded plates Is determined by the immersion method, also referred to as Archimedes method. The density is expressed in kg/m3.


The open cell content was determined using a gas pycnometer. Samples with a weight around 10 gram were taken. The pycnometer pressurizes the foam with nitrogen. Open cells in the foam are filled with nitrogen, while closed cells are not. Consequently, the volume of the foam that cannot be filled by the nitrogen gas equals the volume of the closed cells. The open cell content is defined as:





Open cell content=1−Vpycn/Vgeo






V
pycn=the sample volume measured by the pycnometer=closed cell volume






V
geo=the geometric volume of the sample


Using Archimedes principle, the geometric volume of a sample is measured with a balance by determining the upward force of the sample while being submerged under water. Then the sample is placed in the pycnometer and the volume of the sample in nitrogen is measured. The pressurized nitrogen compresses the closed cells and reduces their volume. To measure the actual, not pressurized, closed cell volume the sample volume is determined at several pressures and the apparent volume at a pressure of 0 bar is determined by extrapolation.


The cellular morphology of the HDPE foams was visualized using scanning electron microscopy. Each sample was frozen with liquid nitrogen and fractured. The fractured surface was made conductive by sputtering deposition of gold and observed using a Jeol JSM-820 operating at 20 kV. The microstructure of the materials has been studied in one plane (machine direction, thickness direction). Three micrographs were taken with a magnification of ×30. The cell size was calculated using an image processing tool based on the software Image J. The fraction foam is defined as the quotient of the thickness of the foam layer and the total thickness. The fraction skin is defined as the quotient of the thickness of the two skin layers and the total thickness.


The flexural properties of the foam Injection moulded samples were determined using ISO 178:2010 as a guideline. Five tests per sample were conducted.


A sample width of 10 mm and a length of 80 mm was used. Following testing conditions were applied:



















Support distance
50.65
mm



Testing speed
2
mm/min










Modulus
between 0.05 and 0.25% strain











Temperature
23°
C.










The flexural rigidity (F) is defined as the product of the modulus (E) by the moment of inertia (I). The moment of inertia (I=width×thickness3/12) is influenced by the thickness of the specific test specimen, whereas the modulus is a material property. In order to compare samples correctly, the thickness used to determine the moment of inertia (I) is corrected for the weight per surface area of the test specimen assuming a linear relationship between the weight per surface area and thickness. In this way data for equal weight per surface area are compared. In this report, the flexural rigidity (F) Is calculated for a weight per surface area of 3 kg/m2(via correction in thickness) using the following formula:







Flexural





rigidity






(
F
)


=

flexural





modulus






(
E
)

×


width
×

thickness
3


12






The change in flexural rigidity upon foaming is calculated by dividing the flexural rigidity of a foam injection moulded sample by the flexural rigidity of the compact 3 mm thick material being 0.0285 N m2


The structural and flexural properties of foam injection moulded HDPE are shown in Table 7 and Table 8. Articles made with electron beam irradiated HDPE of this invention have a relative low density and open cell content as compared to the standard HDPE (Comparative examples). The articles made with electron beam irradiated HDPE have a flexural rigidity being at least a factor 3 higher than compact material with the same weight. Samples produced with standard HDPE only show a limited increase (less than factor 3) In flexural rigidity compared to compact material with the same weight.









TABLE 7







Structural and flexural properties of foam injection moulded


plates produced with MuCell ®technology (physical foaming),


Variotherm and mould opening as described in Table 5.


















Comparative
Comparative


Parameter
Unit
Example I
Example II
Example III
Example A
Example B
















Total density
kg/m3
356
376
383
626
553


Open cell content
%
16
30
30
90
16


Cell size
μm
1386
121
156




Fraction foam

0.81
0.89
0.88
0.76
0.82


Thickness
mm
8.5
8.6
8.5
5.1
5.5


Flexural modulus
N/mm2
412
306
351
759
556


Flexural rigidity

7.2
4.6
4.9
2.4
2.6


change
















TABLE 8







Structural and flexural properties of foam injection


moulded plates using a chemical blowing agent (CF40E)


and a fixed cold mould as described in Table 6.













Comparative


Parameter
Unit
Example IV
Example C













Total density
kg/m3
481
577


Open cell content
%
11
74


Cell size
μm
153
188


Fraction foam

0.78
0.89


Thickness
mm
8.4
8.4


Flexural modulus
N/mm2
455
387


Flexural rigidity change

3.3
1.6








Claims
  • 1-15. (canceled)
  • 16. A method of manufacturing a foamed injection moulded article, the method comprising: a) chain branching a high density polyethylene by electron beam irradiation, the high density polyethylene having MI (melt index) in the range between ≥1 and ≤100, anddensity in the range between ≥930 and ≤985 kg/m3, resulting in a chain branched high density polyethylene havingMI in the range between ≥0.01 and ≤50,density in the range between ≥930 and ≤985 kg/m3,a gel fraction less than 5%, anda quotient of melt strength and apparent viscosity >2cN/k·Pa·s and ≥30 cN/k·Pa·s,wherein MI is measured according ISO1133-1:2011 at a temperature of 190° C. at a load of 2.16 kg, the density is measured at a temperature of 23° C. according ISO1183-1:2012, the gel fraction is determined according to ASTM D2765-11, the melt strength is determined as described in ISO 16790:2005 and the apparent viscosity is determined as described in ISO 11443:2014; andb) physical injection moulding foaming a foam composition at a temperature between 120° C. and 140° C., the foaming composition comprising the chain branched high density polyethylene and a physical blowing agent comprising isobutane, isobutane with CO2, nitrogen, or pure CO2, and/or a fluorohydrocarbon.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the article comprises two compact skins and a foamed core between the compact skins.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the high density polyethylene has MI in the range between ≥7 and ≤100, anddensity in the range between ≥930 and ≤985, and
  • 19. The method of claim 17, wherein the high density polyethylene has MI in the range between ≥10 and ≤100, anddensity in the range between ≥935 and ≤970 kg/m3, and
  • 20. The method of claim 17, wherein the high density polyethylene has MI in the range between ≥12 and ≤50, anddensity in the range between ≥940 and ≤970 kg/m3, and
  • 21. The method of claim 17, wherein a ratio between a thickness of the foamed core and a total thickness of the article is between 0.20 and 0.95.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, wherein a ratio between a thickness of the foam core and a total thickness of the article is between 0.4 and 0.9.
  • 23. The method of claim 16, wherein the foam core has a density ranging between between ≥100 and ≤600 kg/m3.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
16150898.1 Jan 2016 EP regional
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16068555 Jul 2018 US
Child 17155718 US