The present application claims the priority of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/840,905, filed Mar. 15, 2013 and hereby incorporates the same application herein by reference in its entirety.
The present application relates to a foamed thermoplastic polymer separator for cabling. More specifically, the foamed thermoplastic polymer separator provides electrical separation between conductors in a cable, such as a data communications cable.
Conventional data communications cables typically comprise multiple pairs of twisted conductors enclosed within a protective outer jacket. These cables often include twisted pair separators in order to provide physical distance (i.e., separation) between the pairs within a cable, thereby reducing crosstalk. Conventional separators are typically made of dielectric materials, such as polyolefin and fluoropolymers, which provide adequate electrical insulation.
Standard materials used in the formation of separators, like polyolefins and certain fluoropolymers, are disadvantageous for a number of reasons. In the event a portion of the cable ignites, it is desirable to limit the amount of smoke produced as a result of the melting or burning of the combustible portions (e.g., a separator) of the cable. It is also desirable to prevent or limit the spread of flames along the cable from one portion of the cable to another. The conventional materials used for cable separators have poor smoke and/or flame-retardant properties. Therefore, those materials increase the amount of smoke that is emitted in the event of a fire, as well as the distance that the flame travels along the burning cable. In order to mitigate these drawbacks, some manufacturers add flame retardants and smoke suppressants to the conventional polyolefin and fluoropolymer materials. However, smoke suppressants and flame retardants often increase the dielectric constant and dissipative factors of the separator, thereby adversely affecting the electrical properties of the cable by increasing the signal loss of the twisted pairs within close proximity to the separator. Also, flame retardants and smoke suppressants generally contain halogens, which are undesirable because hazardous acidic gases are released when halogens burn.
Moreover, the addition of the separator also adds weight to the cable. It is desirable to keep the weight of the cable as low as possible, for ease of transporting to the job site and for reducing the requirements on supports within the building, for example. To reduce the impact on electrical performance and also to reduce the weight of the cable, some manufacturers may “foam” the separators in order to reduce the amount of material used. A foamed material is any material that is in a lightweight cellular form resulting from introduction of gas bubbles during the manufacturing process. However, foaming of conventional separator materials only minimally reduces the amount of material used because the amount of foaming is limited by the resulting physical strength of the foam. The separator must have sufficient strength to prevent damage during cable processing or manufacturing. Additionally, crushing or deformation of the foamed separators can occur if the foamed material does not have adequate strength, resulting in compaction and less separation between twisted pairs. As a result, traditional foamed separators often possess undesirable mechanical stability.
Accordingly, in light of those drawbacks associated with conventional separators, there is a need for a cable separator that adequately reduces crosstalk between twisted pairs within the cable, while simultaneously improving the flame spread and smoke emission properties of the cable without the addition of halogens. Cable separators that are structurally sound and as lightweight as possible are also desirable.
Accordingly, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides a cable separator comprising a preshaped body having a longitudinal length, wherein the preshaped article is substantially entirely formed of a foamed thermoplastic polymer having a glass transition temperature above 160° C. and being halogen-free.
The present invention may also provide a data communication cable comprising a plurality of conductors and a separator. The separator includes a preshaped body having a longitudinal length, wherein the preshaped body is substantially entirely formed of a foamed thermoplastic polymer having a glass transition temperature above 160° C. and being halogen-free. The separator separates the plurality of conductors.
The present invention may also provide a method of making a cable including the steps of providing a foamed thermoplastic polymer having a glass transition temperature above 160° C. and being halogen-free, and extruding the foamed polymer material to form a separator having a predetermined shape. A plurality of conductors is then provided. The separator is positioned between the plurality of conductors after forming the separator having the predetermined shape and without further manipulation of the separator. An outer jacket is then extruded that surrounds the separator and the plurality of conductors.
Other objects, advantages and salient features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, which, taken in conjunction with the annexed drawings, discloses a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring to
The preshaped body 102 of the separator 100 may take any variety of shapes, provided that the selected shape is suitable to provide conductor separation in a data communication cable 200. As shown in
Each projection 103 may have a first end 106 originating from a center of the body 102 and a second end 108 at which the projection 103 terminates. Along the length of the projection 103, between the first end 106 and the second end 108, the projection 103 may taper. Specifically, the projection 103 may be thickest at its first end 106 and narrowest at its second end 108.
According to one embodiment, the body 102 may be about 0.025-0.035 inches wide (not including the width of the projections 103), and the separator 100 as a whole may be about 0.14-0.25 inches in width and height.
Referring to
Referring to
In all embodiments, the separator is substantially entirely formed of a foamed high-performance thermoplastic polymer, which has a glass transition temperature above 160° C. and which is halogen-free. Materials which are halogen-free contain less than 900 parts per million (ppm) of either chlorine or bromine, and less than 1500 ppm total halogens. A high-performance polymer with a high glass transition temperature (above 160° C.) has high flame retardance/resistance and low smoke emission when subjected to a flame. Further, high-performance thermoplastic polymers have inherently high strength and toughness, which improves their mechanical performance in a variety of high-stress applications. High-performance polymer materials suitable for forming the separator of the present invention include, but are not limited to, polyethersulfone, poly(arylether sulfone), poly(biphenylether sulfone), polysulfone, polyetherimide, polyphenylene, polyimide, polyphenylsulfone, polyphenylenesulfide, poly(aryletherketone), poly(etheretherketone), and blends thereof. According to one embodiment, the polymer materials may be homopolymers, copolymers, alternating copolymers or block copolymers. If the material is a copolymer of the above-mentioned polymers, it is preferably a siloxane copolymer thereof.
Unlike conventional materials used to form separators, no smoke suppressants or flame retardants need to be added to the polymer foam of the present invention to meet the mandatory burn performance required by federally regulated standards. Thus, the separators of the present invention need not include any halogen-containing additives. As a result, in the event of a fire, no hazardous acidic gasses would be released. Further, it is advantageous that no additives are needed for the separator, because they increase the effective dielectric constant and dissipative factors of the separator, thus increasing signal loss of the cable.
The smoke and flame spread performance of a conventional halogen-containing ethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene (ECTFE) material is compared to halogen-free 50% foamed PEI in Table 1 below. Specifically, crossweb separators made of each material were incorporated into two different cables—Construction 1 and Construction 2. Construction 2 is simply a larger cable, having a larger crossweb, than Construction 1. The burn performance was tested according to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards, specifically NFPA 262. Smoke performance is measured by the average optical density and peak optical density of smoke. As can be seen, the PEI foam exhibited improved smoke performance and comparable flame spread performance over the conventional ECTFE for both cable constructions. Further, the PEI foam exhibited the same flame spread performance as ECTFE for Construction 1, and improved flame spread performance over ECTFE for Construction 2. The PEI foam separators meet all federally regulated standards, which require five feet or less of flame spread, a maximum of 0.15 average optical density of smoke, and a maximum of 0.50 peak optical density of smoke.
The separators of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention are “preshaped” in that they are manufactured into a desired shape which is maintained during the cable construction and thereafter. Using a preshaped separator is beneficial in that once the separator is formed, it does not require further configuring or arranging to create a desired shape for use in a cable. That is, the cable manufacturing process is streamlined by preshaping or preforming the separator and thus requiring no further manipulation of the separator when completing the cable construction (e.g., adding a jacket and twisted wire pairs). The polymer foam preferably has, however, enough flexibility to allow it to be constructed into the cable, while also having sufficient rigidity such that it will substantially maintain its shape during manufacture, installation and use of the cable. The rigidity of the polymer separator adds structure and stiffness to the cable, which is desirable to prevent kinking of the cable, such as during the pulling out process from the cable packaging. A stiffer cable also reduces sag between support points in a building, thereby reducing drag during installation.
High-performance polymers which have higher tensile strength, tensile modulus, flexural strength and flexural modulus as compared to other materials are well suited for forming separators. Materials having higher tensile/modulus are stiffer than materials with lower tensile strength/modulus and are not as easily deformed when forces are applied to them. Materials having higher flexural strength and flexural modulus resist bending better than materials with lower flexural strength/modulus and are also not as easily deformed when a flexural force is applied to them. Tensile strength/modulus was measured for a variety of conventional polymer materials according to Active Standard ASTM D638, and flexural strength/modulus was measured for the same polymer materials according to Active Standard ASTM D790. As can be seen in Table 2 below, polyetherimide (PEI) and polyphenylsulfone (PPSU), both halogen-free, outperform conventional halogenated materials, such as, fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), ethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene (ECTFE), perfluoromethylalkoxy (MFA) and flame-retardant polyethylene (FRPE) in tensile strength, tensile modulus, flexural strength and flexural modulus. The PEI and PPSU materials, both of which are high-performance polymers, also outperform high density polyethylene (HDPE), which is not a high-performance polymer, in the same categories. The flexural strength of FEP and MFA is so low that neither can be reliably measured.
By foaming the polymer of the separators of the present invention, the amount of material needed to form the separator is significantly reduced as compared to conventional cable separators, thereby reducing the overall weight of the cable and reducing the amount of flame and smoke producing material. As can be seen in Table 2, some of the high-performance polymer materials also have lower specific gravity than conventional polymer materials, thus further reducing the weight of the resulting separator. High-performance polymers which have glass transition temperatures above 160° C. are preferred because they have high tensile strength which allows for higher foam rates to be achieved, while still maintaining the required strength needed for processing and manufacture. The polymer separators of the present invention may have foam rates of between 30% and 80%, which is significantly higher than the conventional cable construction materials. At higher foam rates, the conventional materials are susceptible to crushing and deformation, thereby jeopardizing the electrical properties of the cable.
One further advantage of the polymer foam involves its use in plenum style communication cables. The use of conventional polymer materials for separators in plenum style cables requires special manufacturing equipment, as these polymers are highly corrosive to unprotected metals. Special corrosion-resistant metals, such as austenitic nickel-chromium based super alloys (i.e., Inconel® and Hastelloy®), must therefore be used. The specialty equipment required to process these materials is expensive, so the use of certain high-performance polymers, such as PEI and PPSU, to form separators provides the added advantage of reducing manufacturing costs.
The separator may be formed using melt processable materials, such as foamed or solid polymers or copolymers. The separator may be foamed through a chemical process, using gas injection or other such methods known to one skilled in the art to achieve uniform fine air bubbles throughout the cross-section of the separator. As is known to one skilled in the art, polymer resins may be foamed with the use of one or more blowing agents. Examples of blowing agents include, but are not limited to, inorganic agents, organic agents, and chemical agents. Examples of inorganic blowing agents include, without limitation, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, argon, water, air nitrogen, and helium. Examples of organic blowing agents include, without limitation, aliphatic hydrocarbons having 1-9 carbon atoms, aliphatic alcohols having 1-3 carbon atoms, and fully and partially halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons having 14 carbon atoms. Exemplary aliphatic hydrocarbons that may be used include, without limitation, methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, isobutane, n-pentane, isopentane, neopentane, and the like. Exemplary aliphatic alcohols include, without limitation, methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, and isopropanol. Fully and partially halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons can be used and include, without limitation, fluorocarbons, chlorocarbons, and chlorofluorocarbons. Examples of fluorocarbons include methyl fluoride, perfluoromethane, ethyl fluoride, 1,1-difluoroethane (HFC-152a), 1,1,1-trifluoroethane (HFC-143a), 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a), pentafluoroethane, difluoromethane, perfluoroethane, 2,2-difluoropropane, 1,1,1-trifluoropropane, perfluoropropane, dichloropropane, difluoropropane, perfluorobutane, perfluodichloropropane, difluoropropane, perfluorobutane, perfluorocyclobutane. Partially halogenated chlorocarbons and chlorofluorocarbons for use in this invention include methyl chloride, methylene chloride, ethyl chloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane (HFC-141b), 1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethane (HCFC-142), chlorodifluoromethane (HCFC-22), 1,1-dichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123) and 1-chloro-1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethane (HCFC-124). Fully halogenated chlorofluorocarbons include trichloromonofluoromethane (CFC-11), dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12), trichlorotrifluoroethane (CFC-113), 1,1,1-trifluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, dichlorotetrafluoroethane (CFC-114), chloroheptafluoropropane, and dichlorhexafluoropropane. However in preferred embodiments, the blowing agents used to foam the separators are halogen-free. Examples of chemical blowing agents that can be used include, without limitation, azodicarbonaminde, azodiisobutyronitrile, benzenesulfonhydrazide, 4,4-oxybenzene sulfonylsemicarbazide, p-toluene sulfonyl semicarbazide, barium azodicarboxylate, N,N′-dimethyl-N,N′-dinitrosoterephthalamide, trihydrazino triazine and 5-phenyl-3,6-dihydro-1,3,4-oxadiazine-2-one. As in known in the art, the blowing agents may be used in various states (e.g., gaseous, liquid, or supercritical).
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
To construct the data communication cable of the present invention, a separator is first formed by extruding the foamed polymer material of the present invention into a predetermined shape. According to one embodiment, the predetermined shape may be a crossweb. According to yet another embodiment, the predetermined shape may be a substantially flat member. Next, a plurality of conductors is provided, and the separator is positioned between groupings of the conductors. With a crossweb shape, the separator separates the plurality of conductors into four groupings. With a substantially flat member shape, the separator separates the plurality of conductors into two groupings. The separator has a predetermined shape, thus no manipulation is needed when positioning the separator between the conductors. Lastly, an outer jacket is extruded. The outer jacket surrounds the separator and the plurality of conductors, and its application requires no further manipulation of the separator.
While particular embodiments have been chosen to illustrate the invention, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3105872 | Thompson et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
3277029 | Chadwick et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
3929908 | Orlando et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4126740 | Factor et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4170711 | Orlando et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4308352 | Knaus | Dec 1981 | A |
4543368 | Smearing et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4923933 | Curry | May 1990 | A |
5010148 | Lewis | Apr 1991 | A |
5317051 | Harashige et al. | May 1994 | A |
5391594 | Romenesko et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5619016 | Newmoyer | Apr 1997 | A |
5969295 | Boucino et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
RE37010 | Newmoyer | Jan 2001 | E |
6310145 | Puyenbroek et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6504379 | Jackson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506976 | Neveux, Jr. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6818832 | Hopkinson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7144935 | Seidel et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7196271 | Cornibert et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7271343 | Clark | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7303810 | Goodson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7695815 | Agarwal et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7732516 | Shen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7848604 | Reed et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7858686 | Jarus et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7999184 | Wiebelhaus et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8097809 | Galletti et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
RE43616 | Chung et al. | Aug 2012 | E |
8445568 | Karremans et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8562873 | Murakami | Oct 2013 | B2 |
9831009 | Brown et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9953742 | Brown et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20040232598 | Donea et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050199415 | Glew | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050255741 | Ashida et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060115222 | Park et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060125136 | Kratzmuller | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070102188 | Glew | May 2007 | A1 |
20070149629 | Donovan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070299169 | Ohira et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015289 | Siripurapu | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033083 | Li et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080166537 | Frankowski et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090069489 | Vollenberg et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090163609 | Lassor et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163610 | Lanning et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090236120 | Wiebelhaus et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090306258 | Sirpurapu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100021718 | Vos et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100046894 | Kachmar | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100200269 | Camp, II et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100280159 | Maas et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100326697 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110220390 | Szylakowski et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110229704 | Grcev et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110284287 | Glew | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120061120 | Harada et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120090871 | Kato et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120267142 | Nordin et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120267146 | Petry et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130037302 | Kroushl et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130048338 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130224461 | van der Mee et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130224462 | van der Mee et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130313493 | Wen et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130330468 | Makadia | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140011065 | Kwon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140027150 | Gundel | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140069687 | Tryson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0352699 | Jan 1990 | EP |
2487694 | Aug 2012 | EP |
1280762 | Jul 1972 | GB |
H10-168319 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2000-143964 | May 2000 | JP |
2002-208316 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2003-36736 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2007-197568 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2008-198592 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2012-144701 | Aug 2012 | JP |
5325683 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2013131474 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2014018672 | Jan 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ngyuen, Chau N.; Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,413; dated Jan. 28, 2015; 10 pages. |
Ngyuen, Chau N.; Non-final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,413; dated Sep. 9, 2014; 8 pages. |
Kim, Tae Hoon; International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, issued in International Application No. PCT/US2014/024817; dated Jun. 27, 2014; 9 pages. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Decision on Appeal, Appeal No. 2016-004297, dated Jul. 3, 2017; issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,413; 6 pages. |
Ngyuen, Chau N.; Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,905; dated Dec. 31, 2014; 11 pages. |
Ngyuen, Chau N.; Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,905; dated Jun. 10, 2015; 10 pages. |
Ngyuen, Chau N.; Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,905; dated Oct. 1, 2015; 8 pages. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Decision on Appeal, Appeal No. 2017-003159, dated Dec. 11, 2017; issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,905; 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180247728 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13840905 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 15959666 | US |