Foamed polymer separator for cabling

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10522264
  • Patent Number
    10,522,264
  • Date Filed
    Monday, April 23, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 31, 2019
    4 years ago
Abstract
A cable separator comprising a preshaped article having a longitudinal length, wherein said preshaped article is substantially entirely formed of a foamed polymer material having a glass transition temperature greater than 160° C. and being halogen-free is provided. A data communications cable comprising a plurality of conductors and the cable separator of the present invention, wherein said cable separator separates the plurality of conductors is provided. A method of manufacturing a cable comprising the separator of the invention is also provided.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claims the priority of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/840,905, filed Mar. 15, 2013 and hereby incorporates the same application herein by reference in its entirety.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present application relates to a foamed thermoplastic polymer separator for cabling. More specifically, the foamed thermoplastic polymer separator provides electrical separation between conductors in a cable, such as a data communications cable.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Conventional data communications cables typically comprise multiple pairs of twisted conductors enclosed within a protective outer jacket. These cables often include twisted pair separators in order to provide physical distance (i.e., separation) between the pairs within a cable, thereby reducing crosstalk. Conventional separators are typically made of dielectric materials, such as polyolefin and fluoropolymers, which provide adequate electrical insulation.


Standard materials used in the formation of separators, like polyolefins and certain fluoropolymers, are disadvantageous for a number of reasons. In the event a portion of the cable ignites, it is desirable to limit the amount of smoke produced as a result of the melting or burning of the combustible portions (e.g., a separator) of the cable. It is also desirable to prevent or limit the spread of flames along the cable from one portion of the cable to another. The conventional materials used for cable separators have poor smoke and/or flame-retardant properties. Therefore, those materials increase the amount of smoke that is emitted in the event of a fire, as well as the distance that the flame travels along the burning cable. In order to mitigate these drawbacks, some manufacturers add flame retardants and smoke suppressants to the conventional polyolefin and fluoropolymer materials. However, smoke suppressants and flame retardants often increase the dielectric constant and dissipative factors of the separator, thereby adversely affecting the electrical properties of the cable by increasing the signal loss of the twisted pairs within close proximity to the separator. Also, flame retardants and smoke suppressants generally contain halogens, which are undesirable because hazardous acidic gases are released when halogens burn.


Moreover, the addition of the separator also adds weight to the cable. It is desirable to keep the weight of the cable as low as possible, for ease of transporting to the job site and for reducing the requirements on supports within the building, for example. To reduce the impact on electrical performance and also to reduce the weight of the cable, some manufacturers may “foam” the separators in order to reduce the amount of material used. A foamed material is any material that is in a lightweight cellular form resulting from introduction of gas bubbles during the manufacturing process. However, foaming of conventional separator materials only minimally reduces the amount of material used because the amount of foaming is limited by the resulting physical strength of the foam. The separator must have sufficient strength to prevent damage during cable processing or manufacturing. Additionally, crushing or deformation of the foamed separators can occur if the foamed material does not have adequate strength, resulting in compaction and less separation between twisted pairs. As a result, traditional foamed separators often possess undesirable mechanical stability.


Accordingly, in light of those drawbacks associated with conventional separators, there is a need for a cable separator that adequately reduces crosstalk between twisted pairs within the cable, while simultaneously improving the flame spread and smoke emission properties of the cable without the addition of halogens. Cable separators that are structurally sound and as lightweight as possible are also desirable.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides a cable separator comprising a preshaped body having a longitudinal length, wherein the preshaped article is substantially entirely formed of a foamed thermoplastic polymer having a glass transition temperature above 160° C. and being halogen-free.


The present invention may also provide a data communication cable comprising a plurality of conductors and a separator. The separator includes a preshaped body having a longitudinal length, wherein the preshaped body is substantially entirely formed of a foamed thermoplastic polymer having a glass transition temperature above 160° C. and being halogen-free. The separator separates the plurality of conductors.


The present invention may also provide a method of making a cable including the steps of providing a foamed thermoplastic polymer having a glass transition temperature above 160° C. and being halogen-free, and extruding the foamed polymer material to form a separator having a predetermined shape. A plurality of conductors is then provided. The separator is positioned between the plurality of conductors after forming the separator having the predetermined shape and without further manipulation of the separator. An outer jacket is then extruded that surrounds the separator and the plurality of conductors.


Other objects, advantages and salient features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, which, taken in conjunction with the annexed drawings, discloses a preferred embodiment of the present invention.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is cross-sectional end view of a foamed separator for cabling in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2A is a cross-sectional end view of a data communication cable including the foamed separator illustrated in FIG. 1, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2B is a cross-sectional end view of a data communication cable in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 2C is a cross-sectional end view of a data communication cable in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2A, a cable separator 100 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention generally comprises a preshaped body 102 having a longitudinal length that is preferably substantially entirely formed of a foamed thermoplastic polymer material. The foamed polymer material is a high-performance thermoplastic polymer having a glass transition temperature above 160° C. and is halogen-free. Use of the foamed polymer to form the cable separator improves the smoke and flame resistance of the resulting cable, improves the electrical performance of the cable, improves the rigidity (and thus structural integrity) of the separator, and decreases the weight of the overall cable.


The preshaped body 102 of the separator 100 may take any variety of shapes, provided that the selected shape is suitable to provide conductor separation in a data communication cable 200. As shown in FIG. 1, the separator body 102 may form a substantially crossweb shape. The separator body 102 may comprise one or more projections 103 extending outwardly from the longitudinal length of the body 102. That is, the projections 103 extend outwardly from a center of the body 102. As depicted in FIG. 1, the separator 100 preferably has four projections 103, although any number of projections 103 may be used. In at least one embodiment, the separator 100 comprises four preshaped projections 103 extending from the center of the body 102, whereby each projection 103 is perpendicular to the adjacent projection 103.


Each projection 103 may have a first end 106 originating from a center of the body 102 and a second end 108 at which the projection 103 terminates. Along the length of the projection 103, between the first end 106 and the second end 108, the projection 103 may taper. Specifically, the projection 103 may be thickest at its first end 106 and narrowest at its second end 108.


According to one embodiment, the body 102 may be about 0.025-0.035 inches wide (not including the width of the projections 103), and the separator 100 as a whole may be about 0.14-0.25 inches in width and height.


Referring to FIG. 2B, a separator 100′ according to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention is substantially the same as the separator 100 of FIG. 2A, except that it preferably has larger dimensions. More specifically, the separator 100′ is sized such that the projections 103′ of the preshaped body 102′ preferably extend to the jacket of the cable.


Referring to FIG. 2C, a separator 100″ according to yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention may be preshaped in the form of a substantially flat member. The substantially flat member may be a tape, for example. The substantially flat separator 100″ may have a wider center with narrowing ends.


In all embodiments, the separator is substantially entirely formed of a foamed high-performance thermoplastic polymer, which has a glass transition temperature above 160° C. and which is halogen-free. Materials which are halogen-free contain less than 900 parts per million (ppm) of either chlorine or bromine, and less than 1500 ppm total halogens. A high-performance polymer with a high glass transition temperature (above 160° C.) has high flame retardance/resistance and low smoke emission when subjected to a flame. Further, high-performance thermoplastic polymers have inherently high strength and toughness, which improves their mechanical performance in a variety of high-stress applications. High-performance polymer materials suitable for forming the separator of the present invention include, but are not limited to, polyethersulfone, poly(arylether sulfone), poly(biphenylether sulfone), polysulfone, polyetherimide, polyphenylene, polyimide, polyphenylsulfone, polyphenylenesulfide, poly(aryletherketone), poly(etheretherketone), and blends thereof. According to one embodiment, the polymer materials may be homopolymers, copolymers, alternating copolymers or block copolymers. If the material is a copolymer of the above-mentioned polymers, it is preferably a siloxane copolymer thereof.


Unlike conventional materials used to form separators, no smoke suppressants or flame retardants need to be added to the polymer foam of the present invention to meet the mandatory burn performance required by federally regulated standards. Thus, the separators of the present invention need not include any halogen-containing additives. As a result, in the event of a fire, no hazardous acidic gasses would be released. Further, it is advantageous that no additives are needed for the separator, because they increase the effective dielectric constant and dissipative factors of the separator, thus increasing signal loss of the cable.


The smoke and flame spread performance of a conventional halogen-containing ethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene (ECTFE) material is compared to halogen-free 50% foamed PEI in Table 1 below. Specifically, crossweb separators made of each material were incorporated into two different cables—Construction 1 and Construction 2. Construction 2 is simply a larger cable, having a larger crossweb, than Construction 1. The burn performance was tested according to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards, specifically NFPA 262. Smoke performance is measured by the average optical density and peak optical density of smoke. As can be seen, the PEI foam exhibited improved smoke performance and comparable flame spread performance over the conventional ECTFE for both cable constructions. Further, the PEI foam exhibited the same flame spread performance as ECTFE for Construction 1, and improved flame spread performance over ECTFE for Construction 2. The PEI foam separators meet all federally regulated standards, which require five feet or less of flame spread, a maximum of 0.15 average optical density of smoke, and a maximum of 0.50 peak optical density of smoke.









TABLE 1







Smoke and Flame Performance of Various Polymer Materials










Construction 1
Construction 2












ECTFE
PEI Foam
ECTFE
PEI Foam















Flame spread (ft)
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.5


Average Optical
0.14
0.10
0.12
0.08


Density (smoke)


Peak Optical
0.29
0.20
0.30
0.21


Density (smoke)









The separators of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention are “preshaped” in that they are manufactured into a desired shape which is maintained during the cable construction and thereafter. Using a preshaped separator is beneficial in that once the separator is formed, it does not require further configuring or arranging to create a desired shape for use in a cable. That is, the cable manufacturing process is streamlined by preshaping or preforming the separator and thus requiring no further manipulation of the separator when completing the cable construction (e.g., adding a jacket and twisted wire pairs). The polymer foam preferably has, however, enough flexibility to allow it to be constructed into the cable, while also having sufficient rigidity such that it will substantially maintain its shape during manufacture, installation and use of the cable. The rigidity of the polymer separator adds structure and stiffness to the cable, which is desirable to prevent kinking of the cable, such as during the pulling out process from the cable packaging. A stiffer cable also reduces sag between support points in a building, thereby reducing drag during installation.


High-performance polymers which have higher tensile strength, tensile modulus, flexural strength and flexural modulus as compared to other materials are well suited for forming separators. Materials having higher tensile/modulus are stiffer than materials with lower tensile strength/modulus and are not as easily deformed when forces are applied to them. Materials having higher flexural strength and flexural modulus resist bending better than materials with lower flexural strength/modulus and are also not as easily deformed when a flexural force is applied to them. Tensile strength/modulus was measured for a variety of conventional polymer materials according to Active Standard ASTM D638, and flexural strength/modulus was measured for the same polymer materials according to Active Standard ASTM D790. As can be seen in Table 2 below, polyetherimide (PEI) and polyphenylsulfone (PPSU), both halogen-free, outperform conventional halogenated materials, such as, fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), ethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene (ECTFE), perfluoromethylalkoxy (MFA) and flame-retardant polyethylene (FRPE) in tensile strength, tensile modulus, flexural strength and flexural modulus. The PEI and PPSU materials, both of which are high-performance polymers, also outperform high density polyethylene (HDPE), which is not a high-performance polymer, in the same categories. The flexural strength of FEP and MFA is so low that neither can be reliably measured.









TABLE 2







Material Properties of Various Polymer Materials















FEP
HDPE
ECTFE
MFA
PEI
FRPE
PPSU


















Halogenated?
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No


Specific gravity
2.17
1.2
1.68
2.15
1.27
1.20-1.65
1.29


Tensile Strength (Mpa)
27
24
54
32
110
16-17
70


Tensile Modulus (MPa)
345
1030
1650
500
3580
1100
2340


Flexural Strength (MPa)

40
50

165
17
90


Flexural Modulus (MPa)
520
1520
1370
650
3510
510
2410









By foaming the polymer of the separators of the present invention, the amount of material needed to form the separator is significantly reduced as compared to conventional cable separators, thereby reducing the overall weight of the cable and reducing the amount of flame and smoke producing material. As can be seen in Table 2, some of the high-performance polymer materials also have lower specific gravity than conventional polymer materials, thus further reducing the weight of the resulting separator. High-performance polymers which have glass transition temperatures above 160° C. are preferred because they have high tensile strength which allows for higher foam rates to be achieved, while still maintaining the required strength needed for processing and manufacture. The polymer separators of the present invention may have foam rates of between 30% and 80%, which is significantly higher than the conventional cable construction materials. At higher foam rates, the conventional materials are susceptible to crushing and deformation, thereby jeopardizing the electrical properties of the cable.


One further advantage of the polymer foam involves its use in plenum style communication cables. The use of conventional polymer materials for separators in plenum style cables requires special manufacturing equipment, as these polymers are highly corrosive to unprotected metals. Special corrosion-resistant metals, such as austenitic nickel-chromium based super alloys (i.e., Inconel® and Hastelloy®), must therefore be used. The specialty equipment required to process these materials is expensive, so the use of certain high-performance polymers, such as PEI and PPSU, to form separators provides the added advantage of reducing manufacturing costs.


The separator may be formed using melt processable materials, such as foamed or solid polymers or copolymers. The separator may be foamed through a chemical process, using gas injection or other such methods known to one skilled in the art to achieve uniform fine air bubbles throughout the cross-section of the separator. As is known to one skilled in the art, polymer resins may be foamed with the use of one or more blowing agents. Examples of blowing agents include, but are not limited to, inorganic agents, organic agents, and chemical agents. Examples of inorganic blowing agents include, without limitation, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, argon, water, air nitrogen, and helium. Examples of organic blowing agents include, without limitation, aliphatic hydrocarbons having 1-9 carbon atoms, aliphatic alcohols having 1-3 carbon atoms, and fully and partially halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons having 14 carbon atoms. Exemplary aliphatic hydrocarbons that may be used include, without limitation, methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, isobutane, n-pentane, isopentane, neopentane, and the like. Exemplary aliphatic alcohols include, without limitation, methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, and isopropanol. Fully and partially halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons can be used and include, without limitation, fluorocarbons, chlorocarbons, and chlorofluorocarbons. Examples of fluorocarbons include methyl fluoride, perfluoromethane, ethyl fluoride, 1,1-difluoroethane (HFC-152a), 1,1,1-trifluoroethane (HFC-143a), 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a), pentafluoroethane, difluoromethane, perfluoroethane, 2,2-difluoropropane, 1,1,1-trifluoropropane, perfluoropropane, dichloropropane, difluoropropane, perfluorobutane, perfluodichloropropane, difluoropropane, perfluorobutane, perfluorocyclobutane. Partially halogenated chlorocarbons and chlorofluorocarbons for use in this invention include methyl chloride, methylene chloride, ethyl chloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane (HFC-141b), 1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethane (HCFC-142), chlorodifluoromethane (HCFC-22), 1,1-dichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123) and 1-chloro-1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethane (HCFC-124). Fully halogenated chlorofluorocarbons include trichloromonofluoromethane (CFC-11), dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12), trichlorotrifluoroethane (CFC-113), 1,1,1-trifluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, dichlorotetrafluoroethane (CFC-114), chloroheptafluoropropane, and dichlorhexafluoropropane. However in preferred embodiments, the blowing agents used to foam the separators are halogen-free. Examples of chemical blowing agents that can be used include, without limitation, azodicarbonaminde, azodiisobutyronitrile, benzenesulfonhydrazide, 4,4-oxybenzene sulfonylsemicarbazide, p-toluene sulfonyl semicarbazide, barium azodicarboxylate, N,N′-dimethyl-N,N′-dinitrosoterephthalamide, trihydrazino triazine and 5-phenyl-3,6-dihydro-1,3,4-oxadiazine-2-one. As in known in the art, the blowing agents may be used in various states (e.g., gaseous, liquid, or supercritical).


As shown in FIGS. 2A, 2B and 2C, separators 100, 100′ and 100″ of the present invention may be used in a data communication cable 200 for separating a plurality of conductors 202. While not limited to such an embodiment, the plurality of conductors 202 may be organized into twisted conductor pairs 206. In that construction, the separator physically separates each of the twisted conductor pairs 206. The data communication cable 200 may also comprise a protective jacket 204 which surrounds the conductors 202.


As shown in FIG. 2A, the projections 103 of the separator 100 may extend sufficiently far so as to provide physical separation between the conductor pairs 206, but not as far as the inside of the projective jacket 204. Alternatively, as shown in FIG. 2B, the projections 103′ of the separator 100′ may extend to the inside of the protective jacket 204 without extending beyond the conductor pairs 206.


As shown in FIG. 2C, the separator 100″ may be preshaped as a substantially flat member. The substantially flat member may be in the form of a tape, for example. In this embodiment, the separator 100″ generally forms two channels to separate one group of conductor pairs 206 from another group of conductor pairs 206.


To construct the data communication cable of the present invention, a separator is first formed by extruding the foamed polymer material of the present invention into a predetermined shape. According to one embodiment, the predetermined shape may be a crossweb. According to yet another embodiment, the predetermined shape may be a substantially flat member. Next, a plurality of conductors is provided, and the separator is positioned between groupings of the conductors. With a crossweb shape, the separator separates the plurality of conductors into four groupings. With a substantially flat member shape, the separator separates the plurality of conductors into two groupings. The separator has a predetermined shape, thus no manipulation is needed when positioning the separator between the conductors. Lastly, an outer jacket is extruded. The outer jacket surrounds the separator and the plurality of conductors, and its application requires no further manipulation of the separator.


While particular embodiments have been chosen to illustrate the invention, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A cable separator, comprising: a preshaped body having a longitudinal length,wherein the preshaped body is substantially entirely formed of a foamed material, wherein the foamed material is selected from the group consisting of polysulfone, polyethersulfone, polyphenylsulfone, poly(arylether sulfone), poly(biphenylether sulfone), and combinations thereof; andwherein the foamed material has a foam rate of about 30% to about 80%.
  • 2. The cable separator of claim 1, wherein the foamed material is polysulfone.
  • 3. The cable separator of claim 1, wherein the foamed material is polyethersulfone.
  • 4. The cable separator of claim 1, wherein the preshaped body comprises about 1500 parts per million (“ppm”) or less of halogens.
  • 5. The cable separator of claim 1, wherein the preshaped body is halogen-free.
  • 6. The cable separator of claim 1, wherein the preshaped body is substantially free of additives.
  • 7. The cable separator of claim 1, wherein the preshaped body comprises one or more projections extending in an outward direction.
  • 8. The cable separator of claim 1, wherein the preshaped body is a cross-web.
  • 9. The cable separator of claim 1, wherein the preshaped body is a substantially flat member.
  • 10. A data communication cable comprising: a plurality of conductors; anda separator, including: a preshaped body having a longitudinal length,wherein said preshaped body is substantially entirely formed of a foamed material and the separator separates the plurality of conductors, wherein the foamed material is selected from the group consisting of polysulfone, polyethersulfone, polyphenylsulfone, poly(arylether sulfone), poly(biphenylether sulfone), and combinations thereof; andwherein the foamed material has a foam rate of about 30% to about 80%.
  • 11. The data communication cable of claim 10, wherein the foamed material is polysulfone.
  • 12. The data communication cable of claim 10, wherein the foamed material is polyethersulfone.
  • 13. The data communication cable of claim 10, wherein the preshaped body comprises about 1500 parts per million (“ppm”) or less of halogens.
  • 14. The data communication cable of claim 10, wherein the preshaped body is halogen-free.
  • 15. The data communication cable of claim 10, wherein the preshaped body is substantially free of additives.
  • 16. The data communication cable of claim 10, wherein the preshaped body comprises one or more projections extending in an outward direction.
  • 17. The data communication cable of claim 10, wherein the preshaped body is a cross-web.
  • 18. The data communication cable of claim 10, wherein the preshaped body is a substantially flat member.
  • 19. The data communication cable of claim 10, wherein the plurality of conductors comprises a plurality of twisted conductor pairs.
  • 20. The data communication cable of claim 10, further comprising a protective jacket surrounding the plurality of conductors.
US Referenced Citations (70)
Number Name Date Kind
3105872 Thompson et al. Oct 1963 A
3277029 Chadwick et al. Oct 1966 A
3929908 Orlando et al. Dec 1975 A
4126740 Factor et al. Nov 1978 A
4170711 Orlando et al. Oct 1979 A
4308352 Knaus Dec 1981 A
4543368 Smearing et al. Sep 1985 A
4923933 Curry May 1990 A
5010148 Lewis Apr 1991 A
5317051 Harashige et al. May 1994 A
5391594 Romenesko et al. Feb 1995 A
5619016 Newmoyer Apr 1997 A
5969295 Boucino et al. Oct 1999 A
RE37010 Newmoyer Jan 2001 E
6310145 Puyenbroek et al. Oct 2001 B1
6504379 Jackson Jan 2003 B1
6506976 Neveux, Jr. Jan 2003 B1
6818832 Hopkinson et al. Nov 2004 B2
7144935 Seidel et al. Dec 2006 B2
7196271 Cornibert et al. Mar 2007 B2
7271343 Clark Sep 2007 B2
7303810 Goodson et al. Dec 2007 B2
7695815 Agarwal et al. Apr 2010 B2
7732516 Shen et al. Jun 2010 B2
7848604 Reed et al. Dec 2010 B2
7858686 Jarus et al. Dec 2010 B2
7999184 Wiebelhaus et al. Aug 2011 B2
8097809 Galletti et al. Jan 2012 B2
RE43616 Chung et al. Aug 2012 E
8445568 Karremans et al. May 2013 B2
8562873 Murakami Oct 2013 B2
9831009 Brown et al. Nov 2017 B2
9953742 Brown et al. Apr 2018 B2
20040232598 Donea et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050199415 Glew Sep 2005 A1
20050255741 Ashida et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060115222 Park et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060125136 Kratzmuller Jun 2006 A1
20070102188 Glew May 2007 A1
20070149629 Donovan et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070299169 Ohira et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080015289 Siripurapu Jan 2008 A1
20080033083 Li et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080166537 Frankowski et al. Jul 2008 A1
20090069489 Vollenberg et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090163609 Lassor et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090163610 Lanning et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090236120 Wiebelhaus et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090306258 Sirpurapu et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100021718 Vos et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100046894 Kachmar Feb 2010 A1
20100200269 Camp, II et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100280159 Maas et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100326697 Venkataraman et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110220390 Szylakowski et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110229704 Grcev et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110284287 Glew Nov 2011 A1
20120061120 Harada et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120090871 Kato et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120267142 Nordin et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120267146 Petry et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130037302 Kroushl et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130048338 Suzuki et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130224461 van der Mee et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130224462 van der Mee et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130313493 Wen et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130330468 Makadia Dec 2013 A1
20140011065 Kwon et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140027150 Gundel Jan 2014 A1
20140069687 Tryson et al. Mar 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
0352699 Jan 1990 EP
2487694 Aug 2012 EP
1280762 Jul 1972 GB
H10-168319 Jun 1998 JP
2000-143964 May 2000 JP
2002-208316 Jul 2002 JP
2003-36736 Feb 2003 JP
2007-197568 Aug 2007 JP
2008-198592 Aug 2008 JP
2012-144701 Aug 2012 JP
5325683 Oct 2013 JP
2013131474 Sep 2013 WO
2014018672 Jan 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Ngyuen, Chau N.; Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,413; dated Jan. 28, 2015; 10 pages.
Ngyuen, Chau N.; Non-final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,413; dated Sep. 9, 2014; 8 pages.
Kim, Tae Hoon; International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, issued in International Application No. PCT/US2014/024817; dated Jun. 27, 2014; 9 pages.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Decision on Appeal, Appeal No. 2016-004297, dated Jul. 3, 2017; issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,413; 6 pages.
Ngyuen, Chau N.; Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,905; dated Dec. 31, 2014; 11 pages.
Ngyuen, Chau N.; Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,905; dated Jun. 10, 2015; 10 pages.
Ngyuen, Chau N.; Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,905; dated Oct. 1, 2015; 8 pages.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Decision on Appeal, Appeal No. 2017-003159, dated Dec. 11, 2017; issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,905; 5 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180247728 A1 Aug 2018 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13840905 Mar 2013 US
Child 15959666 US