In some printing systems, components are capable of moving relative to one another. If a particular component is not in an intended position relative to another component, then a print defect may occur in the resulting printed output.
In one particular type of printing system, liquid electrophotography (LEP) printing techniques may be used. An LEP print apparatus may include a photoconductive surface positioned relative to a light-emitting “writing head” which selectively discharges portion of the photoconductive surface that are to receive print agent.
Examples will now be described, by way of non-limiting example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In a liquid electrophotography (LEP) print apparatus, print agent, such as ink, may pass through a print agent application assembly, such as a binary ink developer (BID). Each BID handles print agent of a particular colour, so an LEP printing system may include, for example, seven BI Ds. Print agent from a BID is selectively transferred from a print agent transfer roller—also referred to as a developer roller—of the BID in a layer of substantially uniform thickness to a photoconductive surface, such as a photo imaging plate (PIP). The selective transfer of print agent is achieved through the use of an electrically-charged print agent, also referred to as a “liquid electrophotographic ink”. As used herein, a “liquid electrophotographic ink” or “LEP ink” generally refers to an ink composition, in liquid form, generally suitable for use in a liquid electrostatic printing process, such as an LEP printing process. The LEP ink may include chargeable particles of a resin and a pigment/colourant dispersed in a liquid carrier.
The LEP inks referred to herein may comprise a colourant and a thermoplastic resin dispersed in a carrier liquid. In some examples, the thermoplastic resin may comprise a copolymer of an alkylene monomer and a monomer selected from acrylic acid and methacrylic acid. In some examples, the thermoplastic resin may comprise a copolymer of an ethylene acrylic acid resin, an ethylene methacrylic acid resin or combinations thereof. In some examples, the thermoplastic resin may comprise an ethylene acrylic acid resin, an ethylene methacrylic acid resin or combinations thereof. In some examples, the carrier liquid is a hydrocarbon carrier liquid such as an isoparaffinic carrier liquid, for example Isopar-L™ (available form EXXON CORPORATION). In some examples, the electrostatic ink also comprises a charge director and/or a charge adjuvant. In some examples, the charge adjuvant includes aluminum di- or tristearate. In some examples, the liquid electrostatic inks described herein may be Electrolnk® and any other Liquid Electro Photographic (LEP) inks developed by Hewlett-Packard Company.
Referring now to the drawings,
The writing head 104 comprises a plurality of light sources (not shown in
Once a latent image has been formed on the photoconductive surface 106, print agent (e.g. electrically charged LEP ink) is selectively transferred onto the charged regions of the photoconductive surface. In the example shown, print agent is provided from a print agent application assembly 110, also referred to as a binary ink developer, or BID. The print agent application assembly 110 includes various components in addition to those shown, which transfer print agent onto a developer roller 112. In the example shown, the developer roller 112 rotates in a direction opposite to the direction of rotation of the roller 108, as shown by the arrows in
In some examples, print agent of different colours may individually be transferred (e.g. each colour from a separate print agent application assembly 110) onto a single photoconductive surface 106. In other examples, a print apparatus may include a separate photoconductive surface 106 and corresponding writing head 104 for each colour of print agent.
As noted above, the writing head 104 may, in some examples, include a plurality of light sources which are to emit radiation through a lens array onto the photoconductive surface 106. If the writing head 104 (e.g. as a result of the arrangement of the light sources and the lens array) is properly focused on the photoconductive surface 106, then a diameter of a spot of the radiation (e.g. light) from the light source on the photoconductive surface will be at its minimum (i.e. a minimum spot diameter). However, if light from a light source is not properly focused on the photoconductive surface 106, then the spot diameter size will be larger, which will result in a lower optical resolution. As noted above, those regions of the photoconductive surface 106 that receive radiation from the light sources of the writing head 104 becomes discharged and will receive print agent from the print agent application assembly 110. Therefore, smaller spot sizes of lights on the photoconductive surface 106 will correspond to smaller spot of print agent transferred onto the printable substrate 118. Similarly, a larger spot size of light on the photoconductive surface 106 (e.g., formed from an out-of-focus light source in the writing head 104) will results in a larger spot of print agent transferred onto the printable substrate 118. A sharper image may, therefore, be formed on the printable substrate 118 if smaller spot sizes of light are directed onto the photoconductive surface 106.
Generally, the optical component (e.g. a lens array) will be installed in the writing head 104 relative to the light sources when the writing head is manufactured or assembled. Therefore, due to manufacturing tolerances and inconsistencies, some of the light sources may be focused differently to other light sources in the same writing head. Thus, once the writing head 104 is installed in position relative to the photoconductive surface 106, there exists the possibility that some of the light sources will be focused on the photoconductive surface while other light sources will not be in focus. To adjust the focus of the light sources of the writing head 104, an adjustment mechanism 120 is provided. The adjustment mechanism 120, which may be controlled by processing circuitry, such as the processor 102, may adjust the position of the writing head 104 relative to the photoconductive surface 106 by varying the distance of the writing head from the photoconductive surface. In general, therefore, the adjustment mechanism 120 may move the writing head 104 into a position (i.e. to a particular distance from the photoconductive surface 106) where the light sources are most focused on the photoconductive surface.
The writing head 104 may, in some examples, have a width largely corresponding to (e.g. approximately the same as) a width of the photoconductive surface 106. In other words, the light sources extend substantially over the width of the photoconductive surface 106. In some examples, the extent of the light sources and/or the width of the photoconductive surface 106 may correspond to the maximum width of printable substrate that can be processed (e.g. printed on) by the print apparatus 100. The adjustment mechanism 120 may, in some examples, be capable of moving the writing head 104 as a single unit; that is to say both ends of the writing head may be moved simultaneously by the same amount relative to the photoconductive surface 106. In other examples, however, a first end of the writing head 104 and a second end of the writing head may be moved independently relative to the photoconductive surface, such that a surface of the writing head (e.g. the surface on which the light sources are mounted) is not parallel to (or substantially parallel to) the photoconductive surface. To effect separate and independent movement of each end of the writing head 104, each end may, in some examples, be provided with or connected to, or may otherwise be operated by, a separate adjustment mechanism 120. Thus, in some examples, the print apparatus 100 may comprise multiple adjustment mechanisms 120. In one example, the single adjustment mechanism 120 may be capable of moving each end of the writing head 104 independently. The adjustment mechanism 120 may, in some examples, comprise a motor.
As will be apparent, due to the above-mentioned manufacturing tolerances and inconsistencies in the writing head 104, while one light source in the writing head may be perfectly in focus on the photoconductive surface 106, other light sources in the plurality of light sources may not be so well focused. The present disclosure provides a mechanism by which a position of the writing head relative to the photoconductive surface may be determined which all of the light sources may be focused within a defined range.
Examples of the focus adjustment process disclosed herein involve printing spots of print agent onto a printable substrate as the position of the writing head 104 is varied between the distal position 202 and the proximal position 204. This may be achieved by controlling the adjustment mechanism 120 to move the writing head 104 from its distal position 202, towards the photoconductive surface 106, into the proximal position 204, while the printable substrate 118 is printed. In other words, while the writing head 104 is moved towards the photoconductive surface 106, spots of radiation from the light sources are directed onto the photoconductive surface 106. As the writing head 104 moves towards the photoconductive surface 106, each light source in the plurality of light sources will transition between a position in which the light source is out of focus, and a position in which the light source is in focus. In other words, while the writing head 104 is moving from the distal position to the proximal position, each light source will be out of focus for the majority of the transition, but will, at some point, be in an optimal, in-focus position. As noted above, when a light source is out of focus (e.g. its focal point does not coincide with photoconductive surface 106) then larger than optimal light spot will be incident on the photoconductive surface, and a corresponding larger than optimal spot of print agent will be deposited onto the printable substrate 118. However, when a light source is in focus (e.g. its focal point coincides with the photoconductive surface 106) then a relatively small light spot will be incident on the photoconductive surface, and the corresponding relatively small spot of print agent will be deposited onto the printable substrate 118. If a light source is then moved into a position where it is again out of focus, then the resulting spot of print agent transferred onto the printable substrate 118 will be relatively large.
A resulting pattern printed onto the printable substrate 118 may be used to determine the position of each light source on the writing head 114 which the light source is in focus (e.g. is focused to its greatest extent).
From knowledge of the position of the writing head 104 relative to the photoconductive surface 106 that resulted in the relatively smaller spots of print agent on the printable substrate 118, it is possible to determine the general position of the first end 104a and the second end 104b of the writing head 104 relative to the photoconductive surface 106 at which the light sources are in focus. Such a determination may be made manually, for example by an operator visually inspecting the printed image on the printable substrate 118, or automatically, using a scanner and/or a densitometer. Image processing techniques may also be used in making the determination. A more precise position of the writing head 104 may be determined account the focus of various light sources in the writing head as will now be discussed with reference to
The method 300 comprises, at block 306, determining, based on the printed image, for each of a plurality of locations along the writing head 104, a position of the writing head relative to the photoconductive surface 106 at which the writing head is most focussed (e.g. the focus is optimal). In one example, the plurality of locations may include locations at or near to the ends 104a, 104b of the writing head 104. The determining of block 306 may be achieved, for example, by examining the printed image on the printable substrate 118 and identifying the locations at either side of the substrate where it can be seen, detected or measured that the printed image corresponds to positions in which radiation emitted from the light sources in the writing head was in focus. For example, with reference to
Depending on the construction or assembly of the light sources on the writing head 104, the array of light sources, which may in some examples be formed as an array of light emitting diodes (LEDs), may extend substantially to the ends 104a, 104b of the writing head, or near to the ends. Thus, in some examples, the plurality of locations along the writing head 104 may comprise at least a location of a light source at an end of the array that is closest to the first end 104a of the writing head and a location of a light source at an end of the array that is closest to the second end 104b of the writing head. Thus, the position of the writing head relative to the photoconductive surface at which the writing head is most focussed (e.g. the focus is at an optimum level) may be determined for just the light sources at or closest to either end of the writing head. In other examples, the relative writing head position may be determined for additional light sources along the length of the writing head.
In some examples, it may be possible to correlate the position on the printable substrate 118 where the smallest spots of print agent are deposited (e.g. in the unshaded region 208 in
Based on the determined positions for the plurality of locations along the writing head 104, a crude approximation of an appropriate position of the writing head relative to the photoconductive surface 106 may be determined. Such an appropriate position may, for example, be determined by moving the first end 104a and the second end 104b of the writing head 104 into positions corresponding to the best focus for the light sources at each end of the array of light sources. However, as noted above, other light sources in the light source array (e.g. light sources positioned between those at the ends of the array) may not be perfectly in focus at positions along a straight line between the light sources at the first and second ends 104a, 104b. Thus, at block 308, the method 300 comprises calculating, using processing apparatus (e.g. the processor 102), a position of the first end 104a of the writing head 104 and a position of the second end 104b of the writing head relative to the photoconductive surface 106 at which the focus of the writing head at the plurality of locations is within a defined threshold. Since the position of the writing head 104 relative to the photoconductive surface 106 can be adjusted just at its ends 104a, 104b, it is not possible to ensure that each light source in the light source array is in a position where it is most focused. Thus, the calculating of block 308 is intended to find an appropriate overall position which puts all (or as many as possible) of the light sources in a position where they are in focus or nearly in focus. The intention is to find a position where the light sources are focused to within a defined focus threshold or range which may, for example, comprise a threshold or range within which a human eye is unlikely to be able to detect a print defect or deficiency in the resulting image that is printed. In some examples, the defined threshold may comprise a threshold within which the focus of the writing head 104 is optimal. The defined threshold may comprise a threshold within which a focus error of the light sources each of the plurality of locations is minimized.
At block 310, the method 300 comprises adjusting the position of the first end 104a of the writing head 104 and the second end 104b of the writing head relative to the photoconductive surface 106 according to the calculated positions. Thus, once the writing head 104 has been moved (e.g. by the adjustment mechanism 120) into its intended position (e.g. an optimum position based on the focus of various positions along the writing head), future printing operations performed using the print apparatus 100 are less likely to include print defects resulting from out-of-focus light sources.
An example of the calculating (block 308) is described below with reference to
The effect of calculating the approximate focal plane based on the plurality of positions along the writing head 104 is shown in the graph of
As noted previously, print agent may be deposited (e.g. at block 302 of the method 300) onto the printable substrate 118 in a series of spots. In some examples, the determining (block 306 of the method 300) may comprise, at block 504, identifying a location in the printed image where the printed spots are smallest. The smallest printed spots may be considered to have resulted from light sources that were most focused on the photoconductive surface 106. The determining of block 306 may further comprise correlating the location of the printed spots on the printable substrate to the position of the writing head 104 relative to the photoconductive surface 106 when the smallest spots were deposited. The correlation may be made using a position indicator, such as the position indicator formed from the print agent deposited at block 502, as discussed above.
The calculating performed during block 308 of the method 300 may, in some examples, comprise, at block 508, fitting a linear curve to the determined positions for the plurality of locations along the writing head 104. Fitting a linear curve may be performed as discussed above with reference to
The processor 606 may, in some examples, calculate the distances (i.e. the distances between the first and second ends of the writing head 104 and the photoconductive surface 106) by determining a linear best-fit of the determined distances for the plurality of points along the writing head; and determining, based on the linear best-fit, the distances of the first end and the second end of the writing head from the photoconductive surface, at which the focus of the writing head at the plurality of points is within the defined focus range. The defined focus range may be selected based on the intended use accuracy of the print apparatus and may, in some examples, comprise a focus range of 0 to 50 μm.
In some examples, in the first position (
The position of the writing head 104 may be adjusted at 2 points; for example, either end of the writing head. Thus, according to some examples, the position adjustment mechanism may comprise a first motor 608 to adjust a position of the first end (
It will be apparent that the methods 300, 500 disclosed herein may be used to adjust focus positions in various types of print apparatus. In one example, the print apparatus 600 may comprise a liquid electrophotography (LEP) print apparatus.
Thus, the methods, print apparatus and machine-readable medium disclosed herein provide a mechanism by which the positions of light sources used in a print apparatus may be adjusted to achieve an intended (e.g. optimum) focus accuracy for the light sources. Specifically, the disclosure enables a determination to be made of a position of a component (e.g. a writing head) relative to another component (e.g. a photoconductive surface) of the print apparatus at which a focus accuracy of all of the light sources meets or exceeds a defined threshold.
Examples in the present disclosure can be provided as methods, systems or machine readable instructions, such as any combination of software, hardware, firmware or the like. Such machine readable instructions may be included on a computer readable storage medium (including but is not limited to disc storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) having computer readable program codes therein or thereon.
The present disclosure is described with reference to flow charts and/or block diagrams of the method, devices and systems according to examples of the present disclosure. Although the flow diagrams described above show a specific order of execution, the order of execution may differ from that which is depicted. Blocks described in relation to one flow chart may be combined with those of another flow chart. It shall be understood that each flow and/or block in the flow charts and/or block diagrams, as well as combinations of the flows and/or diagrams in the flow charts and/or block diagrams can be realized by machine readable instructions.
The machine readable instructions may, for example, be executed by a general purpose computer, a special purpose computer, an embedded processor or processors of other programmable data processing devices to realize the functions described in the description and diagrams. In particular, a processor or processing apparatus may execute the machine readable instructions. Thus functional modules of the apparatus and devices may be implemented by a processor executing machine readable instructions stored in a memory, or a processor operating in accordance with instructions embedded in logic circuitry. The term ‘processor’ is to be interpreted broadly to include a CPU, processing unit, ASIC, logic unit, or programmable gate array etc. The methods and functional modules may all be performed by a single processor or divided amongst several processors.
Such machine readable instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage that can guide the computer or other programmable data processing devices to operate in a specific mode.
Such machine readable instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing devices, so that the computer or other programmable data processing devices perform a series of operations to produce computer-implemented processing, thus the instructions executed on the computer or other programmable devices realize functions specified by flow(s) in the flow charts and/or block(s) in the block diagrams.
Further, the teachings herein may be implemented in the form of a computer software product, the computer software product being stored in a storage medium and comprising a plurality of instructions for making a computer device implement the methods recited in the examples of the present disclosure.
While the method, apparatus and related aspects have been described with reference to certain examples, various modifications, changes, omissions, and substitutions can be made without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure. It is intended, therefore, that the method, apparatus and related aspects be limited only by the scope of the following claims and their equivalents. It should be noted that the above-mentioned examples illustrate rather than limit what is described herein, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design many alternative implementations without departing from the scope of the appended claims. Features described in relation to one example may be combined with features of another example.
The word “comprising” does not exclude the presence of elements other than those listed in a claim, “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality, and a single processor or other unit may fulfil the functions of several units recited in the claims.
The features of any dependent claim may be combined with the features of any of the independent claims or other dependent claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2019/035004 | 5/31/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/242501 | 12/3/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6717606 | Masuda | Apr 2004 | B2 |
8965244 | Shimizu | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9201335 | Judd et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9341979 | Tamarez Gomez et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9712712 | Kuo et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
20110199662 | Yasuda et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20150109397 | Makishima | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150165785 | Washington | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002361923 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2007022060 | Feb 2007 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220091535 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |