Focused formation fluid sampling probe

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6301959
  • Patent Number
    6,301,959
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 26, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 16, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
A formation fluid sampling probe uses two hydraulic lines to recover formation fluids from two zones in a borehole. One of the zones is a guard zone and the other is a probe zone. The guard zone and the probe zone are isolated from each other by mechanical means, with the guard zone surrounding the probe zone and shielding it from the direct access to the borehole fluids. Operation of the tool involves withdrawal of fluid from both zones. Borehole fluids are preferentially drawn into the guard zone so that the probe zone recovers the formation fluid substantially free of borehole fluids. Separation of the guard zone from the probe zone may be accomplished by means of an elastomeric guard ring, by inflatable packers or by tubing. The device can be adapted for use either on a wireline or in an early evaluation system on a drillstring.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The invention relates generally to formation fluid testing and collection apparatus and more particularly to a formation tester that reduces the contamination caused by borehole fluids in recovered formation fluids.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In the oil and gas industry, formation testing tools have been used for monitoring formation pressures along a wellbore, obtaining formation fluid samples from the wellbore and predicting performance of reservoirs around the wellbore. Such formation testing tools typically contain an elongated body having an elastomeric packer that is sealingly urged against the zone of interest in the wellbore to collect formation fluid samples in storage chambers placed in the tool.




During drilling of a wellbore, a drilling fluid (“mud”) is used to facilitate the drilling process and to maintain a pressure in the wellbore greater than the fluid pressure in the formations surrounding the wellbore. This is particularly important when drilling into formations where the pressure is abnormally high: if the fluid pressure in the borehole drops below the formation pressure, there is a risk of blowout of the well. As a result of this pressure difference, the drilling fluid penetrates into or invades the formations for varying radial depths (referred to generally as invaded zones) depending upon the types of formation and drilling fluid used. The formation testing tools retrieve formation fluids from the desired formations or zones of interest, test the retrieved fluids to ensure that the retrieved fluid is substantially free of mud filtrates, and collect such fluids in one or more chambers associated with the tool. The collected fluids are brought to the surface and analyzed to determine properties of such fluids and to determine the condition of the zones or formations from where such fluids have been collected.




One feature that all such testers have in common is a fluid sampling probe. This may consist of a durable rubber pad that is mechanically pressed against the rock formation adjacent the borehole, the pad being pressed hard enough to form a hydraulic seal. Through the pad is extended one end of a metal tube that also makes contact with the formation. This tube (“probe”) is connected to a sample chamber that, in turn, is connected to a pump that operates to lower the pressure at the attached probe. When the pressure in the probe is lowered below the pressure of the formation fluids, the formation fluids are drawn through the probe into the well bore to flush the invaded fluids prior to sampling. In some prior art devices, a fluid identification sensor determines when the fluid from the probe consists substantially of formation fluids; then a system of valves, tubes, sample chambers, and pumps makes it possible to recover one or more fluid samples that can be retrieved and analyzed when the sampling device is recovered from the borehole.




It is critical that only uncontaminated fluids are collected, in the same condition in which they exist in the formations. Commonly, the retrieved fluids are found to be contaminated by drilling fluids. This may happen as a result of a poor seal between the sampling pad and the borehole wall, allowing borehole fluid to seep into the probe. The mudcake formed by the drilling fluids may allow some mud filtrate to continue to invade and seep around the pad. Even when there is an effective seal, borehole fluid (or some components of the borehole fluid) may “invade” the formation, particularly if it is a porous formation, and be drawn into the sampling probe along with connate formation fluids.




In prior art operations, the pressure in the probe, and their connecting hydraulics flow line is lowered below the pressure of the fluid in the formation, drawing fluid from the formation into the probe, through the hydraulic flow line to the well bore. A fluid identification sensor may be installed in the hydraulic flow line, the fluid identification sensor producing a signal indicative of the composition of the fluid passing through it. When the fluid identification sensor determines that the fluid being pumped is primarily formation fluid, a sample chamber valve is opened and the sample chamber is filled.




Additional problems arise in Drilling Early Evaluation Systems (EES) where fluid sampling is carried out very shortly after drilling the formation with a bit. Inflatable packers or pads cannot be used in such a system because they are easily damaged in the drilling environment. In addition, when the packers are extended to isolate the zone of interest, they completely fill the annulus between the drilling equipment and the wellbore and prevent circulation during testing. Additionally, when an EES is used, there may be little or no mud cake formation prior to the test. A mud cake helps in sealing the formation from well bore fluids whereas in the absence of a mudcake, fluid leakage can be a serious problem. Pads are not adequate to provide a seal in the absence of a mudcake.




There is a need for an invention that reduces the leakage of borehole fluid into the sampling probe by isolating the probe from the borehole fluid. Such an invention should also reduce the amount of borehole fluid contaminating the connate fluid being withdrawn from the formation by the probe. Additionally, the invention should be able to sample formation fluids even when the mudcake is thin or non existent. There is a need for an invention that reduces the time spent on sampling and flushing of contaminated samples. The present invention satisfies this need.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




One embodiment of the invention, suitable for use on a wireline, employs a hydraulic guard ring surrounding the probe tube to isolate the probe from the borehole fluid. The guard ring is provided with its own flow line and sample chamber, separate from the flow line and the sample chamber of the probe. By maintaining the pressure in the guard ring at or slightly below the pressure in the probe tube, most of the fluid drawn into the probe will be connate formation fluid. The same result is also obtained by using inflatable packer elements to create a guard ring above and below the sampling section. An alternate embodiment of the invention useful in Drilling Early Evaluation Systems uses two sets of seal elements are used to obtain an uncontaminated fluid sample. Two thin seals, such as the wall of a small pipe are employed to isolate two areas of the formation at the borehole wall: one between the inner and outer seals and the second in the center of the inner seal.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES





FIG. 1

is a simplified schematic illustration of an embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 2

shows a detail of the arrangement of the guard ring in the embodiment illustrated in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a simplified schematic illustration of an alternate embodiment of the present invention using inflatable packers on a wireline;





FIG. 4

is a simplified schematic illustration of an embodiment of the invention for use in a drilling Early Evaluation System using snorkel tubes;





FIG. 5

illustrates some possible arrangements of the tubes in the invention of

FIG. 4

;





FIG. 6

is a simplified schematic illustration of the invention for use in a drilling Early Evaluation System using inflatable packers on a drill pipe;





FIG. 7

shows the simulation of fluid flow in a prior art device;





FIG. 8

shows a simulation of the direction of fluid flow in the vicinity of a fluid sampling pad.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is best understood by reference to

FIGS. 1-3

.

FIG. 1

is a schematic illustration of the preferred embodiment of the present invention. A portion of a borehole


1


is shown in a subterranean formation


7


. The borehole wall is covered by a mudcake


5


. The formation tester body


9


is connected to a wireline


3


leading from a rig at the surface (not shown). Alternatively, the formation tester body may be carried on a drillstring. The details of the method of connection of the tester body to a wireline or drillstring would be familiar to those versed in the art.




The formation tester body is provided with a mechanism, denoted by


10


, to clamp the tester body at a fixed position in the borehole. This clamping mechanism is at the same depth as a probe and guard ring arrangement, details of which are seen in FIG.


2


.




By means of the clamping mechanism,


10


, a fluid sampling pad,


13


, is mechanically pressed against the borehole wall. A probe tube,


17


, is extended from the center of the pad, through the mud cake,


5


, and pressed into contact with the formation. The probe is connected by a hydraulic flow line,


23




a,


to a probe sample chamber,


27




a.






The probe is surrounded by a guard ring,


15


. The guard ring is a hydraulic tube, formed into a loop, that encircles the probe. The guard ring has suitable openings along its length, the openings being in contact with the formation. The guard ring is connected by its own hydraulic flow line,


23




b


, to a guard sample chamber,


27




b


. Because the flow line


23




a


of the probe,


17


, and flow line


23




b


of the guard ring,


15


, are separate, the fluid flowing into the guard ring does not mix with the fluid flowing into the probe. The guard ring isolates the flow into the probe from the borehole beyond the pad


13


. Thus three zones are defined in the borehole: a first zone consisting of the borehole outside the pad


13


, a second zone (the guard zone) consisting of the guard ring


15


and a third zone (probe zone) consisting of the probe


17


. The probe zone is isolated from the first zone by the guard zone.




The hydraulic flow lines


23




a


and


23




b


are each provided with pressure transducers


11




a


and


11




b.


The pressure maintained in the guard flowline is the same as, or slightly less than, the pressure in the probe flowline. With the configuration of the pad and the guard ring, borehole fluid that flows around the edges of the pad is preferentially drawn into the guard ring,


15


, and diverted from entry into the probe,


17


.




The flow lines


23




a


and


23




b


are provided with pumps


21




a


and


21




b.


These pumps are operated long enough to substantially deplete the invaded zone in the vicinity of the pad and to establish an equilibrium condition in which the fluid flowing into the probe is substantially free of contaminating borehole filtrate.




The flow lines


23




a


and


23




b


are also provided with fluid identification sensors,


19




a


and


19




b


. This makes it possible to compare the composition of the fluid in the probe flowline


23




a


with the fluid in the guard flowline


23




b


. During initial phases of operation of the invention, the composition of the two fluid samples will be the same; typically, both will be contaminated by the borehole fluid. These initial samples are discarded. As sampling proceeds, if the borehole fluid continues to flow from the borehole towards the probe, the contaminated fluid is preferentially drawn into the guard ring. Pumps


21




a


and


21




b


discharge the sampled fluid into the borehole. At some time, an equilibrium condition is reached in which contaminated fluid is drawn into the guard ring and uncontaminated fluid is drawn into the probe. The fluid identification sensors


19




a


and


19




b


are used to determine when this equilibrium condition has been reached. At this point, the fluid in the probe flowline is free or nearly free of contamination by borehole fluids. Valve


25




a


is opened, allowing the fluid in the probe flowline


23




a


to be collected in the probe sample chamber


27




a


. Similarly, by opening valve


25




b


, the fluid in the guard flowline is collected in the guard sample chamber


27




b


. The ability to pump from the guard ring into the guard sample chamber is one of the novel features of the invention: this results in an increased rate of flow from the formation into the probe and thereby improves the shielding effect of the guard ring. Alternatively, the fluid gathered in the guard ring can be pumped to the borehole while the fluid in the probe line is directed to the probe sample chamber


27




a


. Sensors that identify the composition of fluid in a flowline would be familiar to those knowledgeable in the art.





FIG. 3

shows an alternate embodiment of the invention. A portion of a borehole


101


is shown in a subterranean formation


107


. The borehole wall is covered by a mudcake


105


. The formation tester body


109


is connected to a wireline


103


leading from a rig at the surface (not shown). The details of the method of connection of the tester body to the wireline would be familiar to those versed in the art.




The formation tester body is provided with inflatable flow packers


112


and


112


′ and inflatable guard packers


110


and


110


′. When the formation tester is at the depth at which formation fluids are to be sampled, the inflatable packers


110


,


110


′,


112


and


112


′ are inflated to form a tight seal with the borehole wall and mudcake


105


. The mechanism for activating the packers would be familiar to those versed in the art.




A hydraulic flow line (probe flowline)


123




a


is connected to an opening


114


in the tester located between the flow packers


112


and


112


′ and to a probe sample chamber


127




a


. This serves to sample formation fluid that flows into the borehole between the two flow packers. A second hydraulic flow line (guard flowline)


123




b


is connected to openings


116


and


116


′ in the tester located between the guard packer


110


and the flow packer


112


and between the guard packer


110


′ and flow packer


112


′ respectively. The guard flowline is connected to a guard sample chamber


127




b


. Thus three zones are defined in the borehole: a first zone consisting of the borehole above the packer


110


and below the packer


110


′, a second zone (the guard zone) consisting of the region between the packers


110


and


112


and between the packer


110


′ and


112


′; and a third zone (probe zone) consisting of the zone between the packers


112


and


112


′. The probe zone is isolated from the first zone by the guard zone.




The hydraulic flow lines


123




a


and


123




b


are each provided with pressure transducers


111




a


and


111




b.


The pressure maintained between each of the flow packers and the adjacent guard packer is the same as, or slightly less than, the pressure between the two flow packers. With the configuration of the guard and flow packers, borehole fluid that flows around the edges of the guard packers is preferentially drawn into the guard flowline


123




b


, and diverted from entry into the probe flowline


123




a.






The flow lines


123




a


and


123




b


are provided with pumps


121




a


and


121




b


. These pumps are operated long enough to substantially deplete the invaded zone in the vicinity of the tool and to establish an equilibrium condition in which the fluid flowing into the probe flowline is substantially free of contaminating borehole filtrate.




The flow lines


123




a


and


123




b


are also provided with fluid identification sensors,


119




a


and


119




b


. This makes it possible to compare the composition of the fluid in the probe flowline


123




a


with the fluid in the guard flowline


123




b


. During initial phases of operation of the invention, the composition of the two fluid samples will be the same; typically, both will be contaminated by the borehole fluid. These initial samples are discarded. As sampling proceeds, if the borehole fluid continues to flow from the borehole towards the opening


114


, the contaminated fluid is preferentially drawn into the openings


116


and


116


′. Pumps


121




a


and


121




b


discharge the sampled fluid into the borehole. At some time, an equilibrium condition is reached in which contaminated fluid is drawn into the guard flowline and uncontaminated fluid is drawn into the probe flowline. The fluid identification sensors


119




a


and


119




b


are used to determine when this equilibrium condition has been reached. At this point, the fluid in the probe flowline is free or nearly free of contamination by borehole fluids. Valve


125




a


is opened, allowing the fluid in the probe flowline


123




a


to be collected in the probe sample chamber


127




a


. Similarly, by opening valve


125




b


, the fluid in the guard flowline is collected in the guard sample chamber


127




b


. The ability to pump from the guard ring into the guard sample chamber is one of the novel features of the invention: this results in an increased rate of flow from the formation into the probe and thereby improves the shielding effect of the guard ring.





FIG. 4

shows an alternate embodiment of the invention suitable for use in a drilling early evaluation system (EES). The borehole wall


205


in a formation


207


is indicated. The EES tool


209


is inside the borehole and attached to the drilling means (not shown). For simplicity of illustration, only one side of the EES tool is shown. Contact with the formation is accomplished by means of an outer snorkel tube


215


and an inner snorkel tube


217


. The two tubes are independently movable, the inner snorkel tube


217


having the capability of penetrating deeper into the formation. Means for operating snorkel tubes of this kind would be familiar to those knowledgeable in the art.




The inner snorkel tube


217


is connected to probe flowline


223




a


while the region between the inner snorkel tube


217


and the outer snorkel tube


215


defines a guard zone that is connected to the guard flowline


223




b


. Flowlines


223




a


and


223




b


are provided with pumps and sample chambers (not shown). The inner snorkel tube


217


defines a probe zone that is isolated by the outer snorkel tube


215


from the portion of the borehole outside the outer snorkel tube. These pumps are operated long enough to substantially deplete the invaded zone in the vicinity of the outer snorkel tube


215


and to establish an equilibrium condition in which the fluid flowing into the inner snorkel tube is substantially free of contaminating borehole filtrate. When the equilibrium condition is reached, contaminated fluid is drawn into the guard zone and uncontaminated fluid is drawn into the inner snorkel tube. At this time, sampling is started with the pumps continuing to operate for the duration of the sampling. As sampling proceeds, the borehole fluid continues to flow from the borehole towards the probe, while the contaminated fluid is preferentially drawn into the outer snorkel tube. Pumps (not shown) discharge the contaminated fluid into the borehole. The fluid from the inner snorkel tube is retrieved to provide a sample of the formation fluid.





FIGS. 5



a


-


5




c


show alternative arrangements of the snorkel tube. In

FIG. 5



a


, the inner snorkel tube


241


and the outer snorkel tube


243


are shown as concentric cylinders. In

FIG. 5



b


, the annular region between the inner snorkel tube


245


and the outer snorkel tube


247


is segmented by means of a plurality of dividers


249


.

FIG. 5



c


shows an arrangement in which the guard zone is defined by a plurality of tubes


259


interposed between the inner snorkel tube


255


and the outer snorkel tube


257


. In any of these configurations, a wire mesh or a gravel pack may also be used to avoid damage to the formation.





FIG. 6

shows an alternative EES tool that uses short packers instead of the snorkel tubes. The packers may be inflatable or may be expandable metal packers. A portion of a borehole


301


, is shown in a subterranean formation,


307


. The borehole wall is shown at


305


. The formation tester body


309


, is connected to a drilling apparatus. The EES tool is provided with short flow packers


312


and


312


′ and guard packers


310


and


310


′. The zone between the flow packers


312


and


312


′ defines the probe zone while the zone between the flow packers and the guard packers


310


and


310


′ defines the guard zone. When the formation tester is at the depth at which formation fluids are to be sampled, the inflatable packers


310


,


310


′,


312


and


312


′ are inflated to form a tight seal with the borehole wall


305


. The mechanism for activating the packers would be familiar to those versed in the art. Thus three zones are defined in the borehole: a first zone consisting of the borehole above the packer


310


and below the packer


310


′, a second zone (the guard zone) consisting of the region between the packers


310


and


312


and between the packer


310


′ and


312


′; and a third zone (probe zone) consisting of the zone between the packers


312


and


312


′. The probe zone is isolated from the first zone by the guard zone.




A hydraulic flow line (probe flowline),


323


, is connected to an opening,


314


, in the tester located in the probe zone and to a pump (not shown). This serves to sample formation fluid that flows into the borehole between the two flow packers. A second hydraulic flow line (guard flowline),


323




b


, is connected to openings


316


and


316


′ in the tester located between the guard zone. The pumps are operated long enough to substantially deplete the invaded zone in the vicinity of the pad and to establish an equilibrium condition in which the fluid flowing into the inner snorkel tube is substantially free of contaminating borehole filtrate. As sampling proceeds, if the borehole fluid continues to flow from the borehole towards the probe, the contaminated fluid is preferentially drawn into the guard ring. Pumps (not shown) discharge the sampled fluid into the borehole. At some time, an equilibrium condition is reached in which contaminated fluid is drawn into the guard zone and uncontaminated fluid is drawn into the inner snorkel tube. This fluid is retrieved to provide a sample of the formation fluid. The pumps continue to operate during the process of retrieval of the formation fluid from the inner snorkel tube.




The walls of the packers need only be thick enough to provide the necessary structural arrangement wherein the flow into the inner tube is isolated from the flow outside; this means that problems encountered in prior art where, in the absence of a mudcake, leakage occurs around the packers is circumvented.




EXAMPLES




The effectiveness of the focused type probe is demonstrated by the results of a finite element simulation shown in

FIGS. 7 and 8

. In both figures, one fourth of the pad area is shown with the remaining portion cut away to see into the formation.

FIG. 7

is for the simulation of an unfocussed flow, i.e., a conventional probe according to prior art. In

FIG. 7

, the direction labeled


421


is radial and into the formation,


425


follows the borehole wall vertically and


423


follows the borehole wall circumferentially. The center of the probe is at the intersection of


421


,


423


and


425


. The arrows in

FIG. 7

show the direction of fluid flow in the simulation. The zones labeled


427


and


427


′ show that borehole fluid is flowing into the probe and contaminating the fluid drawn into the probe. In addition, the zone labeled as


429


generally corresponds to borehole fluids that have invaded the formation and are flowing back into the probe.





FIG. 8

is for the simulation of a focused flow, i.e., a probe according to the present invention. The direction labeled


431


is radial and into the formation,


435


follows the borehole wall vertically and


433


follows the borehole wall circumferentially. The center of the probe is at the intersection of


431


,


433


and


435


. The arrows in show the direction of fluid flow in the simulation. It can be seen in

FIG. 8

that in the zones corresponding to


427


and


427


′ in

FIG. 7

, the flow direction is radial, i.e., the borehole fluid is not being drawn into the probe. Instead, the borehole fluid flows into the zone labeled as


437


. This corresponds to the position of the guard ring, packer or snorkel tube. Furthermore, in the zone corresponding to


429


in

FIG. 7

, the flow direction is radial, indicating that the probe is effectively draining fluid from deeper into the formation with less contamination by invaded borehole fluids.




The foregoing description has been limited to specific embodiments of this invention. It will be apparent, however, that variations and modifications may be made to the disclosed embodiments, with the attainment of some or all of the advantages of the invention. Therefore, it is the object of the appended claims to cover all such variations and modifications as come within the true spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A formation tester tool for retrieving a formation fluid from a formation surrounding a wellbore having a drilling fluid, comprising:(a) a first element adapted to retrieve the formation fluid from a first (probe) zone in the formation, the first element having a first controlled pressure; and (b) an isolation device, said isolation device defining a second (guard) zone adjacent the probe zone said second guard zone being maintained at a second controlled pressure, the first and second pressures being varied such that the flow of drilling fluid into the probe zone is reduced; and (c) a device for retrieving fluid from the guard zone.
  • 2. The formation tester tool of claim 1, wherein the first element is a probe adapted to contact the formation; and wherein the isolation device is a guard ring surrounding the probe, the guard ring having at least one opening that is in fluid communication with the formation.
  • 3. The formation tester tool of claim 1 wherein the isolation device is a guard ring.
  • 4. The formation tester tool of claim 3 further comprising a guard flow line connected to the guard zone.
  • 5. The formation tester tool of claim 4 further comprising:a probe flow line connected to the probe zone; a first fluid analysis device in the probe flow line; and a second fluid analysis device in the guard flow line.
  • 6. The formation tester tool of claim 1 wherein the first element comprises a pair of probe packers adapted to engage the walls of the borehole defining the probe zone therebetween and the isolation device comprises a pair of guard packers disposed about the pair of probe packers, said guard packers adapted to engage the walls of the borehole and define the guard zone between each of the probe packers and the adjacent guard packer.
  • 7. The formation tester tool of claim 6 further comprising a probe flow line connected to the probe zone.
  • 8. The formation tester tool of claim 7 wherein the tool is adapted to be used on a wireline.
  • 9. The formation tester tool of claim 7 wherein the tool is adapted to be used on a drillstring.
  • 10. The formation tester tool of claim 8, further comprising a first control device for controlling fluid flow into the probe flow line and a second control device for controlling fluid flow into the second line.
  • 11. The formation tester tool of claim 10, wherein the first control device maintains a first pressure in the probe flow line and the second control device maintains a second pressure in the guard flow line, the second pressure being less than or equal to the first pressure.
  • 12. The formation tester tool of claim 11, further comprising a first fluid analysis device in the probe flow line.
  • 13. The formation tester tool of claim 1, wherein the first element comprises an inner snorkel tube adapted to penetrate the formation and the isolation device comprises an outer snorkel tube adapted to penetrate the formation.
  • 14. The formation tester tool of claim 13 wherein the tool is adapted to be used on a drillstring.
  • 15. The formation tester tool of claim 5, further comprising a probe fluid sample chamber connected to the probe flow line.
  • 16. The formation tester tool of claim 15, wherein the formation fluid tester is adapted to be used on a wireline.
  • 17. A method for retrieving a formation fluid from a formation surrounding a wellbore having a contaminating fluid, comprising:conveying a formation tester into the wellbore, said formation tester defining a probe zone and a guard zone adjacent the formation; controlling the pressures of the probe zone and guard zone such that the guard zone pressures is the same as or lower than the probe zone pressure; and retrieving formation fluid from the probe zone.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, further comprising:(a) connecting a guard flow line to the guard zone; (b) connecting a probe flow line to the probe zone.
  • 19. The method of claim 17, further comprising:(a) expanding a pair of guard packers on the formation tester to engage the walls of the borehole; and (b) expanding a pair of probe packers on the formation tester to engage the walls of the borehole and defining the probe zone therebetween, the probe packers being disposed between the guard packers and defining the guard zone between each of the probe packers and the adjacent guard packer.
  • 20. The method of claim 19 further comprising operating the formation tester on a wireline.
  • 21. The method of claim 19 further comprising operating the formation tester on a drillstring drillstring.
  • 22. The method of claim 19 further comprising:(a) activating an inner tube on the formation tester to penetrate the formation to define the probe zone, and (b) activating an outer tube on the formation tester to penetrate the formation, to define the guard zone by the region between the first tube and the second tube.
  • 23. The method of claim 17, further comprising:retrieving fluid from the guard zone; and comparing the probe zone fluid with the guard zone fluid.
  • 24. The method of claim 23, further comprising:determining when the probe zone fluid is substantially free of contaminating fluid; and collecting probe zone fluid into a probe sample chamber.
  • 25. The method of claim 24, further comprising discharging the guard zone fluid into the formation.
  • 26. The method of claim 24, further comprising collecting the guard zone fluid into a guard sample chamber.
  • 27. A method for retrieving a formation fluid from a formation surrounding a wellbore having a drilling fluid comprising:conveying a formation tester into the wellbore, said formation tester defining a probe zone and a guard zone adjacent the formation; operating the formation tester to retrieve fluid from the guard zone and reducing the flow of the drilling fluid into the probe zone; and retrieving fluid from the probe zone; connecting a guard flow line to the guard zone; connecting a probe flow line to the probe zone; and lowering the pressure in the guard flow line to below the pressure of the probe flow line.
  • 28. The method of claim 27 further comprising determining when the fluid in the probe flow line is substantially free of drilling fluids.
  • 29. A formation tester tool for retrieving a formation fluid from a formation surrounding a wellbore having a drilling fluid, comprising:a probe adapted to retrieve the formation fluid from a first (probe) zone in the formation; a probe flow line associated with the probe: a guard ring, said guard ring defining a second (guard) zone adjacent the probe zone; a guard flow line associated with the guard ring; a first pump adapted to control pressure in the probe flow line; and a second pump adapted to control pressure in the guard flow line. a device for retrieving fluid from the guard zone in order to reduce the flow of the drilling fluid into the probe zone.
  • 30. The formation tester tool of claim 29, wherein the first pump maintains a first pressure in the probe flow line and the second pump maintains a second pressure in the guard flow line, the first pressure and second pressures maintained such that drilling fluid is diverted from the probe zone.
  • 31. The formation tester tool of claim 30, further comprising first and second fluid identification sensors in fluid communication with the probe and guard zone flow lines, respectively.
  • 32. The formation tester tool of claim 31, further comprising a sample chamber adapted to receive fluid from the probe flow line.
  • 33. A formation tester tool for retrieving a formation fluid from a formation surrounding a wellbore having a drilling fluid comprising:a probe adapted to contact said the formation and retrieve the formation fluid from a first (probe) zone in the formation; a guard ring, said guard ring defining a second (guard) zone adjacent the probe zone; a guard flow line connected to the guard zone for retrieving fluid from the guard zone; a probe flow line connected to the probe zone; and a first control device for controlling fluid flow into the probe flow line and a second control device for controlling fluid flow into the guard flow line, wherein the first control device maintains a first pressure in the probe flow line and the second control device maintains a second pressure in the guard flow line, the first pressure being greater than or equal to the second pressure.
  • 34. The formation tester tool of claim 33, further comprising a first fluid analysis device in the probe flow line and a second fluid analysis device in the guard flow line.
  • 35. The formation tester tool of claim 34 further comprising a probe fluid sample chamber connected to the probe flow line.
  • 36. The formation tester tool of claim 35 wherein the formation tester tool is adapted to be used on a wireline.
  • 37. A formation tester tool for retrieving a formation fluid from a formation surrounding a wellbore having a drilling fluid, comprising:a probe adapted to retrieve the formation fluid from a first (probe) zone in the formation; a guard ring said guard ring defining a second (guard) zone adjacent the probe zone; and a device for retrieving fluid from the guard zone in order to reduce the flow of the drilling fluid into the probe zone; a probe flow line in fluid communication with the probe zone; a first control device for controlling fluid flow into the probe flow line; and a second control device for controlling fluid flow into the guard flow line; wherein the first control device maintains a first pressure in the probe flow line and the second control device maintains a second pressure in the guard flow line, the first pressure being greater than or equal to the second pressure.
  • 38. A fluid sampling tool for retrieving a first fluid from a first zone where an adjacent second zone has a second fluid, comprising:a tool body having a first chamber the first chamber adapted to receive the first fluid; a probe having a first portion for penetrating the first zone, the probe having a probe flow line in fluid communication with the first chamber; the probe flow line having a first controlled flow rate; and a guard ring circumferentially disposed around the probe, the guard including a guard flow line, the guard flow line having a second controlled flow rate the first and second controlled flow rates varied such that the flow of the second fluid into the first zone is reduced.
  • 39. The fluid sampling tool of claim 38 further comprising a first fluid analysis device in the probe flow line and a second fluid analysis device in the guard flow line.
  • 40. The fluid sampling tool of claim 38 further comprising a guard fluid sample chamber connected to the guard flow line.
  • 41. The fluid sampling tool of claim 38 wherein the formation tester tool is adapted to be used on a wireline.
  • 42. A formation tester tool for retrieving a formation fluid from a formation surrounding a wellbore having a drilling fluid, comprising:(a) a first element adapted to retrieve the formation fluid from a first probe zone in the formation, the first element having a first controlled pressure; and (b) an isolation device, said isolation device defining, a second zone adjacent the probe zone, the isolation device having a second controlled pressure the first pressure being greater than or equal to the second pressure, thereby creating a fluid retrieval condition where the flow of drilling fluid into the first probe zone is reduced; and (c) a device for retrieving formation fluid from the second zone.
  • 43. The formation tester tool of claim 42, wherein the first element is a probe adapted to contact the formation; and wherein the isolation device is a guard ring surrounding the probe, the guard ring having at least one opening being in contact with the formation.
  • 44. The formation tester tool of claim 43 further comprising a guard flow line connected to the guard zone.
  • 45. The formation tester tool of claim 44, further comprising:a probe flow line connected to the probe zone; a first fluid analysis device in the probe flow line; and a second fluid analysis device in the guard flow line.
  • 46. A method for retrieving a formation fluid from a formation surrounding a wellbore having a contaminating fluid, comprising:positioning a formation tester in the wellbore, said formation tester defining a probe zone and a guard zone adjacent the formation; varying the pressure in the probe zone and guard zone such that the contaminating fluid is drawn from the formation into the guard zone, thereby creating a fluid retrieval condition where the flow of contaminating fluid into the probe zone is reduced; and retrieving formation fluid from the probe zone.
  • 47. The method of claim 46 further comprising determining when the fluid in the probe flow line is substantially free of drilling fluids.
US Referenced Citations (17)
Number Name Date Kind
2189919 Moore Feb 1940
2503557 McKinley Apr 1950
2623594 Sewell Dec 1952
2747401 Doll May 1956
3323361 LeBourg Jun 1967
3530711 Tocanne Sep 1970
3611799 Davis Oct 1971
3762219 Jessup Oct 1973
3969937 Barrington et al. Jul 1976
4392376 Lagus et al. Jul 1983
4416152 Wilson Nov 1983
4635717 Jageler Jan 1987
4860581 Zimmerman et al. Aug 1989
5219388 Meletiou et al. Jun 1993
5230244 Gilbert Jul 1993
5337838 Sorensen Aug 1994
5831156 Mullins Nov 1998