The present invention relates to a technology to determine the density of fog.
Patent Literature 1 describes a technology to decide whether fog is present around a vehicle.
In Patent Literature 1, electromagnetic waves are transmitted to an area around the vehicle and reflection points are determined based on reflected waves of the electromagnetic waves. A plurality of determined reflection points with which the distance between the reflection points is within a certain range are classified as one segment. When the rate of second reflection points existing on scanning lines of electromagnetic waves passing through a first segment, which is a segment of first reflection points, is high, it is decided that the first segment is fog.
In the technology described in Patent Literature 1, when the density of fog is high, the number of electromagnetic waves that pass through the fog is small resulting in a low rate of second reflection points existing on scanning lines of electromagnetic waves passing through the first segment. Therefore, it is difficult to determine that fog is present.
It is an object of the present invention to appropriately determine the density of fog.
A fog determination apparatus according to the present invention includes
In the present invention, the density of fog is determined based on whether reflection points are distributed in an arcuate shape around an optical sensor. The distribution state of reflection points around the optical sensor varies with the density of fog, so that the density of fog can be appropriately determined.
Description of Configuration
Referring to
The fog determination apparatus 10 is a computer, such as an electronic control unit (ECU), to be mounted on a mobile object 100.
In the first embodiment, the mobile object 100 is a vehicle. However, the mobile object 100 is not limited to the vehicle, and may be other types such as a ship or an airplane. The fog determination apparatus 10 may be implemented in a form integrated with or a form inseparable from the mobile object 100 or another component illustrated in the drawing, or may be implemented in a form detachable from or a form separable from the mobile object 100 or another component illustrated in the drawing.
The fog determination apparatus 10 includes hardware of a processor 11, a memory 12, a storage 13, and a communication interface 14. The processor 11 is connected with other hardware components via signal lines and controls the other hardware components.
The processor 11 is an integrated circuit (IC) that performs processing. Specific examples of the processor 11 are a central processing unit (CPU), a digital signal processor (DSP), and a graphics processing unit (GPU).
The memory 12 is a storage device to temporarily store data. Specific examples of the memory 12 are a static random access memory (SRAM) and a dynamic random access memory (DRAM).
The storage 13 is a storage device to store data. A specific example of the storage 13 is a hard disk drive (HDD). Alternatively, the storage 13 may be a portable recording medium, such as a Secure Digital (SD, registered trademark) memory card, CompactFlash (CF, registered trademark), a NAND flash, a flexible disk, an optical disc, a compact disc, a Blu-ray (registered trademark) disc, or a digital versatile disc (DVD).
The communication interface 14 is an interface for communication with external devices. Specific examples of the communication interface 14 are an Ethernet (registered trademark) port, a Universal Serial Bus (USB) port, and a High-Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI, registered trademark) port.
The communication interface 14 is connected with an optical sensor 41 mounted on the mobile object 100. The optical sensor 41 is a device that emits a light beam, which is a beam of light, and receives reflected light of the emitted light beam reflected at a reflection point. A specific example of the optical sensor 41 is a LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging).
The fog determination apparatus 10 includes, as functional components, a point data acquisition unit 21 and a fog determination unit 22. The functions of the functional components of the fog determination apparatus 10 are realized by software.
The storage 13 stores programs for realizing the functions of the functional components of the fog determination apparatus 10. These programs are loaded into the memory 12 by the processor 11 and executed b the processor 11. This realizes the functions of the functional components of the fog determination apparatus 10.
The storage 13 realizes the function of a decision information storage unit 31.
Description of Operation
Referring to
The operation of the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the first embodiment corresponds to a fog determination method according to the first embodiment. The operation of the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the frit embodiment also corresponds to processes of a fog determination program according to the first embodiment.
Referring to
(Step S11: Point Data Acquisition Process)
The point data acquisition unit 21 acquires, via the communication interface 14, a set of point data indicating reflection points obtained by the optical sensor 41 that receives reflected light of an emitted light beam reflected at the reflection points.
Point data is a pair of first point data indicating a first reflection point, which is a reflection point of a given light beam emitted by the optical sensor 41, and second point data indicating a second reflection point, which is a reflection point at which the intensity of reflected light of the given light beam is lower than that at the first reflection point. In the first embodiment, the first reflection point is a reflection point with the highest intensity of reflected light, and the second reflection point is a reflection point with the second highest intensity of reflected light after the first reflection point.
As illustrated in
(Step 412: Clustering Process)
The point data acquisition unit 21 performs clustering on the point data included in the set acquired in step S11.
Specifically, the point data acquisition unit 21 performs clustering on the point data included in the set based on the position of at least one of the first reflection point and the second reflection point so as to generate one or more clusters. As a method for clustering the point data, an existing cluster technique may be used. For example, the point data acquisition unit 21 groups pieces of point data with which the distance between the positions of the respective first reflection points is within a certain distance into one cluster.
In this description, the point data acquisition unit 21 performs clustering. However, the point data acquisition unit 21 may acquire a set of point'data on which clustering has been performed. That is, clustering of point data may be performed in an ECU for clustering that is separate from the fog determination apparatus 10, and the point data acquisition unit 21 may acquire a set of point data on which clustering has been performed in the ECU for clustering.
(Step S13: Fog Determination Process)
The fog determination unit 22 determines the density of fog based on a distribution of the distance between the first reflection point and the second reflection point concerning the point data included in the set acquired in step S11. The fog determination unit 22 here determines the density of fog based on a distribution of the distance between the first reflection point and the second reflection point concerning the point data clustered into one cluster in step S12.
Specifically, the fog determination unit 22 determines the density of fog by comparing a distribution pattern of the distance corresponding to each density of fog with the distribution of the distance concerning the point data included in the set. In the first embodiment, the fog determination unit 22 determines the density of fog by comparing a histogram pattern of frequencies of the distance corresponding to each density of fog with a histogram of frequencies of the distance concerning the point data included in the set.
Referring to
(Step S21: Histogram Generation Process)
As illustrated in (A) of
Specifically, the fog determination unit 22 determines the number of pieces of point data for each length of the distance, and divides each determined number of pieces of point data by the number of pieces of point data included in the cluster so as to calculate a frequency for each length of the distance. The fog determination unit 22 generates a histogram indicating the calculated frequencies.
In the first embodiment, the decision information storage unit 31 stores distribution patterns of the distance between the first reflection point and the second reflection point for each density of fog. Specifically, the decision information storage unit 31 stores histograms of frequencies of the distance between the first reflection point and the second reflection point for each density of fog.
The process of step S22 is performed using each of the histogram patterns stored in the decision information storage unit 31 as a target pattern.
(Step S22: Comparison Process)
As illustrated in (B) of
Specifically, the fog determination unit 22 retrieves the target pattern from the decision information storage unit 31. The fog determination unit 22 compares the retrieved target pattern with the histogram generated in step S21. As a method for comparison, an existing similarity comparison technique may be used. In the first embodiment, the fog determination unit 22 treats bins of a histogram as vectors, and calculates a similarity between vectors of the retrieved pattern and vectors of the histogram generated in step S21 based on the Euclidean distance or histogram intersection. This is not limiting, and the fog determination unit 22 may perform comparison using techniques such as a support-vector machine (SVM), AdaBoost, and supervised learning of a multilayer perception.
(Step S23: Density Determination Process)
The fog determination unit 22 determines a pattern with which the highest similarity is calculated in step S22, out of the histogram patterns stored in the decision information storage unit 31. The fog determination unit 22 determines that the density of fog corresponding to the determined pattern is the density of fog mound the mobile object 100.
In Example 1 of
Note that determining the density of fog is not limited to determining a level of density out of a plurality of levels of density of fog, but also includes determining whether fog with a density greater than or equal to a certain level is present. That is, determining the density of fog includes deciding whether fog is present.
As described above, the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the first embodiment determines the density of fog based on the distribution of the distance between the first reflection point and the second reflection point. The distribution of the distance between the first reflection point and the second reflection point varies with the density of fog, so that the density of fog can be appropriately determined.
<First Variation>
In the first embodiment, the functional components are realized by software.
As a first variation, however, the functional components may be realized by hardware. With regard to this first variation, differences from the first embodiment will be described.
Referring to
When the functional components are realized by hardware, the fog determination apparatus 10 includes an electronic circuit 15, in place of the processor 11, the memory 12, and the storage 13. The electronic circuit 15 is a dedicated circuit that realizes the functions of the functional components, the memory 12, and the storage 13.
The electronic circuit 15 is assumed to be a single circuit, a composite circuit, a programmed processor, a parallel-programed processor, a logic IC, a gate array (GA), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or a field-programmable gate array (FPGA).
The functional components may be realized by one electronic circuit 15, or the functional components may be distributed among and realized by a plurality of electronic circuits 15.
<Second Variation>
As a second variation, some of the functional components may be realized by hardware, and the rest of the functional components may be realized by software.
Each of the processor 11, the memory 12, the storage 13, and the electronic circuit 15 is referred to as processing circuitry. That is, the functions of the functional components are realized by the processing circuitry.
<Third Variation>
In the first embodiment, the fog determination apparatus 10 is realized by one computer such as an ECU. However, the fog determination apparatus 10 may be realized by a plurality of computers such as ECUs.
A second embodiment differs from the first embodiment in that the density of fog is determined based on whether reflection points are distributed in an arcuate shape around the optical sensor 41. In the second embodiment, this difference will be described, and description of the same portions will be omitted.
Description of Operation
Referring to
The operation of the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the second embodiment corresponds to a fog determination method according to the second embodiment. The operation of the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the second embodiment also corresponds to processes of a fog determination program according to the second embodiment.
Referring to
(Step S31: Point Data Acquisition Process)
The point data acquisition unit 21 acquires a set of point data indicating reflection points obtained by the optical sensor 41 that receives reflected light of an emitted light beam reflected at the reflection points.
In the second embodiment, unlike in the first embodiment, point data need not be a pair of first point data and second point data. In the second embodiment, point data may indicate only one reflection point.
(Step S32: Fog Determination Process)
The fog determination unit 22 determines the density of fog based on whether the reflection points are distributed in an arcuate shape around the optical sensor 41 when the reflection points indicated by the point data included in the set acquired in step S31 are seen in an overhead view.
That is, the fog determination unit 22 transforms the set of point data indicating the reflection points illustrated in (A) of
Referring to
(Step S41: Circle Approximation Process)
The fog determination unit 22 calculates a circle approximated by the least-squares method of the circle, using as inputs depth and horizontal coordinates of the reflection points indicated by the point data included in the set acquired in step S31.
Specifically, the fog determination unit 22 inputs depth and horizontal coordinates (xi, yi) of a reflection point indicated by point data i (i=1 . . . , n) included in the set into the least-squares equations of the circle indicated in Formula 1 to calculate center coordinates (A, B) and a radius C of the circle to be approximated.
(Step S42: Variance Calculation Process)
The fog determination unit 22 treats each piece of point data included in the set acquired in step S31 as target point data, and calculates a distance d from the reflection point indicated by the target point data to the circle calculated in step S41. That is, as illustrated in
(Step S43: Density Determination Process)
The fog determination unit 22 determines the density of fog based on the variance value calculated in step S42. The fog determination unit 22 determines a higher density of fog as the variance value is smaller.
In the second embodiment, the decision information storage unit 31 stores threshold values of the variance value for each density of fog. The fog determination unit 22 determines the density of fog by comparing the variance value calculated in step S42 with the threshold values for each density of fog stored in the decision information storage unit 31.
As described above, the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the second embodiment determines the density of fog based on whether reflection points are distributed in an arcuate shape around the optical sensor 41. When fog is present, reflection points are distributed in an arcuate shape around the optical sensor 41. Therefore, it is possible to appropriately determine whether fog is present.
The fog determination apparatus 10 according to the second embodiment determines the density of fog based on the variance value of the distance d from each of the reflection points to the circle. The variance value varies with the density of fog, so that the density of fog can be appropriately determined.
A third embodiment differs from the first and second embodiments in that the density of fog is determined by a combination of the method for determining the density of fog described in the first embodiment and the method for determining the density of fog described in the second embodiment. In the third embodiment, this difference will be described, and description of the same portions will be omitted.
Description of Configuration
Referring to
The fog determination apparatus 10 differs from those in the first and second embodiments in that the fog determination unit 22 includes a first determination unit 23, a second determination unit 24 and an overall determination unit 25.
Description of Operation
Referring to
The operation of the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the third embodiment corresponds to a fog determination method according to the third embodiment. The operation of the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the third embodiment also corresponds to processes of a fog determination program according to the third embodiment.
(Step S51: Point Data Acquisition Process)
The point data acquisition unit 21 acquires a set of point data.
In the third embodiment, point data is a pair of first point data and second point data.
(Step S52: First Determination Process)
The first determination unit 23 determines the density of fog as a first density based on a distribution of the distance between the first reflection point and the second reflection point. That is, the first determination unit 23 determines the density of fog by the method described in the first embodiment.
(Step S53: Second Determination Process)
The second determination unit 24 calculates a circle approximated by the reflection points when the reflection points indicated by the point data included in the set are seen in an overhead view, and determines the density of fog as a second density based on a variance of the distance between the calculated circle and each of the reflection points. That is, the second determination unit 24 determines the density of fog by the method described in the second embodiment.
At this time, the second determination unit 24 may use only the first point data included in the point data, or may use both the first point data and the second point data.
(Step S54: Overall Determination Process)
The overall determination unit 25 determines the density of fog based on the first density determined in step S52 and the second density determined in step S53.
For example, assume that each of the first density and the second density has determined that fog is present or no fog is present. In this case, the overall determination unit 25 determines that fog is present if both the first density and the second density indicate that fog is present, and determines that no fog is present in other cases.
For example, assume that each of the first density and the second density has determined a level of density of fog out of a plurality of levels. In this case, the overall determination unit 25 determines the density of fog by comparing the sum of a weighted value of the first density and a weighted value of the second density with a threshold value set for each level of density of fog. That is, the overall determination unit 25 determines the density of fog by comparing θ1X+θ2Y with a threshold value the set for each level of density, where the first density is X, the second density is Y, the weight of the first density is θ1, and the weight of the second density is θ2.
As described above, the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the third embodiment determines the density of fog by a combination of the methods described in the first and second embodiments. This allows the density of fog to be determined with high accuracy.
A fourth embodiment differs from the first to third embodiments in that a sensor threshold value of a sensor for identifying an obstacle is set depending on the density of fog that has been determined. In the fourth embodiment, this difference will be described, and description of the same portions will be omitted.
Description of Configuration
Referring to
The fog determination apparatus 10 differs from those in the first to third embodiments in that a recognition unit 26 and a threshold value setting unit 27 are included.
Description of Operation
Referring to
The operation of the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the fourth embodiment corresponds to a fog determination method according to the fourth embodiment. The operation of the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the fourth embodiment also corresponds to processes of a fog determination program according to the fourth embodiment.
Referring to
Step S61 is the process to determine the density of fog described in the first to third embodiments.
(Step S62: Threshold Value Setting Process)
The threshold value setting unit 27 sets the sensor threshold value of the sensor for identifying an obstacle depending on the density of fog determined in step S61.
Referring to
When tail lamps are identified using the camera, a boundary line that linearly distinguishes tail lamps and others is used as the sensor threshold value on a UV plane of YUV data. Thus, the threshold value setting unit 27 sets this boundary line depending on the density of fog. The boundary line can be expressed as V=a·U+b. Thus, the threshold value setting unit 27 sets the values of a and b depending on the density of fog.
As illustrated in
Note that
(Step S63: Recognition Process)
The recognition unit 26 recognizes an obstacle, using tire sensor threshold value set in step S62.
In the example in
As described above, the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the fourth embodiment sets the sensor threshold value depending on the density of fog. This allows an obstacle to be appropriately recognized.
A fifth embodiment differs from the first to fourth embodiments in that a sensor to be used for identifying an obstacle is decided depending on the density of fog. In the fifth embodiment, this difference will be described, and description of the same portions will be omitted.
Note that an example in which a function is added to the first to third embodiments will be described here. However, the function may also be added to the fourth embodiment.
Description of Configuration
Referring to
The fog determination apparatus 10 differs from those of the first to third embodiments in that the recognition unit 26 and a sensor decision unit 28 are included. Another difference from the first to third embodiments is that the storage 13 realizes the function of a reliability storage unit 32.
Description of Operation
Referring to
The operation of the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the fifth embodiment corresponds to a fog determination method according to the fifth embodiment. The operation of the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the fifth embodiment also corresponds to processes of a fog determination program according to the fifth embodiment.
Referring to
Step S71 is the process to determine the density of fog, described in the first to third embodiments.
(Step S72: Sensor Decision Process)
The sensor decision unit 28 decides the sensor to be used for identifying an obstacle depending on the density of fog determined in step S71.
Specifically, the reliability storage unit 32 stores reliabilities depending on the distance, separately for each density of fog and for each sensor mounted on the mobile object 100. As illustrated in
The sensor decision unit 28 refers to the reliability storage unit 32, and decides, as the sensor to be used for identifying an obstacle, a sensor having a high reliability in the case of the density of fog deter mined in step S71. The sensor decision unit 28 may decide the sensor to be used for identifying an obstacle separately for each length of the distance.
For example, the sensor decision unit 28 decides to use the LiDAR and the camera when no fog is present, and decides to use the millimeter wave radar and the camera when fog is present.
(Step S73: Recognition Process)
The recognition unit 26 recognizes an obstacle, using the sensor decided in step S72.
As described above, the fog determination apparatus 10 according to the fifth embodiment decides the sensor to be used for identifying an object depending on the density of fog. This allows an obstacle to be appropriately recognized.
Other Configuration
<Fourth Variation>
In the fifth embodiment, the function is added to the first to third embodiments. However, the function may also be added to the fourth embodiment.
In this case, as illustrated in
Note that the processes of steps S81, S82, and S84 are the same as the processes of steps S71, S72, and S73 in
The embodiments and variations of the present invention have been described above. Any ones of these embodiments and variations may be implemented in combination. Alternatively, any one or ones of these embodiments and variations may be partially implemented. Note that the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments and variations, and various modifications can be made as necessary.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2018/009395 | 3/12/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/175919 | 9/19/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7414706 | Nichols | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7423752 | Leleve | Sep 2008 | B2 |
8473144 | Dolgov et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8983705 | Zhu | Mar 2015 | B2 |
11391845 | Hiroi | Jul 2022 | B2 |
20030222983 | Nobori et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040054473 | Shimomura | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20070031006 | Leleve et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080007429 | Kawasaki et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20140067187 | Ferguson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140121880 | Dolgov et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140233805 | Faber et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140297094 | Dolgov et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150061493 | Jeromin et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160349358 | Noda | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180266876 | Carmon | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190179052 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20210019537 | Hiroi | Jan 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102009028578 | Feb 2011 | DE |
102012209810 | Dec 2012 | DE |
102015208149 | Nov 2016 | DE |
10 2015 112 103 | Jan 2017 | DE |
3456597 | Mar 2019 | EP |
H07216545 | Aug 1995 | JP |
2000-329852 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2004-56778 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004-112144 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2008-33872 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2009-42177 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2009-177311 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2010-15436 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010-97430 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2013-192003 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2014-89691 | May 2014 | JP |
2016-223872 | Dec 2016 | JP |
2017-97906 | Jun 2017 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Machine Translation of DE-102009028578-A1 (Year: 2011). |
“Monitor provides a virtual 360-degree scene of the car in bird's-eye view,” Aug. 4, 2016, Nissan (Year: 2016). |
Pan, Ting et al., “Evaluation of Roundness Error Measured by Articulated Coordinate Measuring Machine,” Feb. 4, 2013, IEEE, 2012 Second International Conference on Instrumentation & Measurement, Computer, Communication, and Control, pp. 276-279 (Year: 2013). |
Proof of prior public availability for the above document (Year: 2013). |
Roberts, Donna, “Variance and Standard Deviation,” Dec. 2, 2016, MathBitsNotebook.com. (Year: 2016). |
Proof of prior public availability for the above document (Year: 2016). |
International Search Report (PCT/ISA/210) issued in PCT/JP2018/009395 mailed on May 22, 2018. |
Chinese Office Action and Search Report for Chinese Application No. 201880090770.6, dated Nov. 2, 2021, with English translation of the Chinese Office Action. |
German Office Action for German Application No. 112018007029.8, dated May 26, 2021, with English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200408919 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |