A rear elevational view of the foldable crate, in the unfolded position, is not shown because it is identical to the front elevational view shown in
The ornamental design which is claimed is shown in solid lines in the drawings.
A rear elevational view of the foldable crate, in the unfolded position, is not shown because it is identical to the front elevational view shown in
The ornamental design which is claimed is shown in solid lines in the drawings.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D228881 | Stauble | Oct 1973 | S |
D355073 | Junaedi | Feb 1995 | S |
D370344 | Kim | Jun 1996 | S |
D379718 | Raghunathan | Jun 1997 | S |
D381513 | Brauner | Jul 1997 | S |
D387557 | Provot | Dec 1997 | S |
D423217 | Varfeldt | Apr 2000 | S |
D446392 | Overholt | Aug 2001 | S |
D614403 | Byron | Apr 2010 | S |
D663121 | Barth | Jul 2012 | S |
D670081 | Orgeldinger | Nov 2012 | S |
D797453 | Shamp | Sep 2017 | S |
D801686 | Park | Nov 2017 | S |
D801687 | Holland | Nov 2017 | S |
D801688 | Holland | Nov 2017 | S |
D802926 | Turner | Nov 2017 | S |
D816997 | Turner | May 2018 | S |
20140083896 | Park | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20170137175 | Park | May 2017 | A1 |