The invention relates generally to vehicle head restraints and more particularly to foldable vehicle head restraints.
Head restraints protect a vehicle occupant from serious injury due to sudden movement of the vehicle. The head restraints generally extend upward from the seat.
While the head restraints are necessary to insure the safety of passengers, at times the head restraints can present difficulties. Head restraints can obstruct the driver's view when looking rearward. If a seat is folded forward to allow a passenger to enter the rear portion of a vehicle, the head restraint may contact an object in front of the seat thus stopping the seat from fully folding down. In vehicles with seats that fold flat into the floor, the head restraint must be removed or additional stowage space in the floor of the vehicle must be provided.
A foldable head restraint has been described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/672,703, assigned to the assignee of this patent application. A foldable head restraint has a design position where the head restraint is generally upright and serves as protection for a vehicle passenger. The foldable head restraint also has a folded position, where the head restraint is rotated to allow complete kinematic movement of the seatback, or to increase rearward visibility.
While foldable head restraints offer advantages over non-foldable head restraints, foldable head restraints are generally more difficult to assemble and therefore relatively more expensive. A foldable head restraint which is easier to manufacture and less expensive is thus desirable.
A foldable head restraint has two head restraint supports set within a bracket. The head restraint supports are comprised of a metal substrate and a section of an over-molded geometry. The over-molded geometry is generally plastic. A latch is made integral with the metal substrate. The latch rests against a stop to prohibit rotation of the head restraint support in a first direction and rests against a rotational cam to prohibit movement of the head restraint supports in a second direction. A user rotates the cam to an open position to allow the head restraint supports to be pivoted to a folded position. To reduce the size of the slots in the seatback which are often provided to accommodate foldable head restraints, the head restraint supports have a general shape of a “J”. Other shapes and configurations are possible.
The metal substrate of the head restraint supports could be fine blanked, precision stamped, or manufactured by a close tolerance metal fabrication process thereby significantly reducing the cost of the head restraint support. The metal substrate can then be over-molded. The over-molded shape and cross-section can be varied as needed to allow mating of the head restraint supports with components found in the head restraint bun.
The head restraint supports for the primary side and the secondary side of the head restraint are identical, allowing for ease of mass production. Also, due to the geometry of the metal substrate and over-molded geometry the package size of the head restraint supports is more compact when compared to similar mechanisms.
These and other objects, advantages, and features of the invention will be more readily understood and appreciated by reference to the detailed description of the drawings.
As shown in
Cable wire 40 is also attached to cable pin 38. Cable wire 40 is part of cable 42. One end of cable 42 is attached to cable termination 44, which is normally integral to bracket 10. The other end of cable 42 may be attached to the vehicle body or to some other device, such as a manual release lever, in order to actuate the folding mechanism of head restraint 5.
The angle of head restraint supports 12, 14 relative to a vertical plane can be selected such that head restraint supports 12, 14 will immediately rotate toward the folded position when rotational cam 30 has rotated sufficiently to free latch 22 due to the force exerted on head restraint supports 12, 14 by torsion spring 7. Alternatively, the head restraint 5 could be designed such that some other force would need to be applied to head restraint supports 12, 14 to cause head restraint supports 12, 14 to rotate to the folded position.
To return head restraint 5 to the design position, a force is applied on head restraint supports 12, 14 usually through the head restraint bun. Head restraint support 12 rotates until latch 22 strikes rotational cam 30. Referring against
When a further force is applied to head restraint support 12, latch surface 29 causes rotational cam 30 to rotate further so that latch 22 can come to rest against stop pin 32. Due to the configuration of the surfaces of latch 22, head restraint support 12 is then locked into the design position by contact between rotational cam 30 and latch surface 25.
Metal substrate 18 can be fine blanked, precision stamped, or close tolerance metal fabricated component, and would preferably be made of a high strength steel. Metal substrate 18 can be over-molded. By varying the design of the over-molded geometry, head restraint support 12 could easily mate with a variety of head restraint buns. Rotational rod 24 and stabilizer shaft 28 are usually steel rods.
Bracket 10 is usually contained within a seat back. Head restraint supports 12, 14 extend through the top of the seat back through a pair of slots. In order to minimize the size of these slots, head restraints supports 12, 14 have the shape of a “J”. Other shapes can be used for head restraint supports 12, 14 depending upon the particular application.
Assembly of head restraint 5 is simple. Head restraint supports 12, 14 are first joined by stabilizer shaft 28, and this assembly is then placed within bracket 10. Rotational rod 24 is inserted through bracket 10 and through head restraint supports 12, 14.
The above description is of the preferred embodiment. Various alterations and changes can be made without departing from the spirit and broader aspects of the invention as defined in the appended claims, which are to be interpreted in accordance with the principles of patent law including the doctrine of equivalents. Any references to claim elements in the singular, for example, using the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” or “said,” is not to be construed as limiting the element to the singular.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2976915 | Spound | Mar 1961 | A |
2984293 | Bontempi et al. | May 1961 | A |
3065029 | Spound et al. | Nov 1962 | A |
3695700 | Flach | Oct 1972 | A |
4353595 | Kaneko et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4576413 | Hatta | Mar 1986 | A |
4600240 | Suman et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4682817 | Freber | Jul 1987 | A |
4761034 | Saito | Aug 1988 | A |
4830434 | Ishida et al. | May 1989 | A |
5145233 | Nagashima | Sep 1992 | A |
5181758 | Sandvik | Jan 1993 | A |
5346277 | Holobaugh et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5492386 | Callum | Feb 1996 | A |
5590933 | Andersson | Jan 1997 | A |
5642918 | Sakamoto et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5681079 | Robinson | Oct 1997 | A |
5927804 | Cuevas | Jul 1999 | A |
6024405 | MacAndrew et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6050633 | Droual | Apr 2000 | A |
6074011 | Ptak et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6129421 | Gilson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6183045 | Marfilius et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6485096 | Azar et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6499805 | Watadani | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517156 | Lin | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6612653 | Takata | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6702385 | Holdampf et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6761548 | Snop | Jul 2004 | B1 |
20010054837 | O'Connor | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030234567 | O'Connor | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050067874 | Kamrath et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
31 29 063 | Apr 1983 | DE |
33 25 927 | Jan 1985 | DE |
2 796 345 | Jan 2001 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050225146 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |