The present invention relates generally to multi-section agricultural implements and more specifically to folding disks.
Depth control on the front, outer corner of wing-folding disks is difficult to maintain because of the forces acting on the disk blades at the corner. The combination of side thrust forces along the axis of the disk gang and draft forces perpendicular to the axis of the gang results in the outer disk blades trying to go deeper while the blades on the opposite end of the gang react by rising to shallower depths. Reliance on the primary wing lift wheel assemblies is often ineffective since the wheels are located behind the front gang and ground contour changes will have already passed the front gangs before being encountered by the wheels.
Several approaches exist to counter the negative effects of the side and draft forces. One approach is a rigid frame structure to minimize deflection with depth control maintained through the lift wheels. A second approach commonly used in single offset disks requires addition of weight or change in hitch pull point to balance forces across the machine width. A third alternative is use of hydraulic force to control wing frame forces and prevent gouging. A rigid hinge structure may be used to control the outer gang by eliminating deflection.
Stabilizer wheels installed on the outer corners of folding disks also are used to control depth. Commonly, a manual adjustment is used to set depth, and on-the-go depth control is not available. Also, with the wings unfolded the corner wheels fail to provide support for the frame during field transport, and the rear wheels have to support the wing weight during transport. The position of the wing depth control wheels is close to the center of the wing so that heavier, stronger more costly frames are required to limit frame deflection.
The corner depth control problems increase with wing size. As a result, as disks are made larger, there are more limitations on optimum performance than with narrower width disks. The outer wing depth control wheels must be positioned such that the wings are balanced during field transport and front gang depth control function is maintained during disking operations. Disks equipped with manually adjusted gage wheels can be adjusted for improved performance but this adjustment must be maintained with each change of disking depth. This problem is common with three- or four-section disks that have one set of folding wings, as well as five-section disks having two sets of folding wings.
Mechanically or hydraulically actuated gauge wheels are located at the outer front portions of the wing frames and are connected for operation with the main frame and primary wing frame depth control wheels. The front stabilizer wheels bear much of the loading of the wings and allow the wing primary depth control wheels to be positioned closer to the rear of the machine than in at least most previously available multi-section folding disks.
In one embodiment of the invention, the front gauge wheels are hydraulically controlled by a control valve on the tractor. Independent control allows the operator to make on-the-go depth control adjustments at the front of the disk depending on field conditions. In another embodiment, the front gauge wheels can be tied mechanically to the primary wing depth control wheels by an adjustable link such as a turnbuckle to decrease system complexity.
During operation, the front stabilizer wheels help control the forces on the outer wing gang to prevent wing gouging problems commonly experienced on most other free-floating disk wings. The adjustable on-the-go stabilizer wheels improve wing performance significantly compared to disks that rely on the wing depth control wheels to prevent gouging. The stabilizer wheels are located adjacent the front gang and can follow ground contour changes before the wing disk blades encounter the changes.
Frame deflection in the outer wing frame members is reduced compared to manually adjusted front stabilizer wheels since both the front stabilizer wheels and rear wheels provide support. With the support of the front stabilizer wheels during field transport, the position of the wing depth control wheels can be positioned near the rear of the frame so that very expensive heavy frames are no longer required. Wing weight is shared by the front gauge wheels and rear wheels during field transport for more balanced wheel loading. Additional rear weight of rear attachments such as a coil tine harrow that shifts weight balance to the rear of the disk is more effectively supported by the new wheel arrangement. The wheel arrangement also permits the disk size to be increased without compromising depth control performance. The gauge wheel concept can also be used with narrower three-section frames to enhance implement performance.
Referring now to
The lift wheel assemblies 30-46 include corresponding hydraulic cylinders 30′-46′ connected to selective control valve structure 47 (
Wing fold cylinders 60, 62, 64 and 66 unfold and fold the wing frames to and from an extended field-working position (shown). When the disk 10 is narrowed for road transport, the outer wing frames 24 and 26 are folded over the inner wing frames 14 and 16 by retracting the cylinders 64, 66. The inner wing frames 14 and 16 are pivoted upwardly relative to the center frame 12 by retracting the cylinders 60, 62. To position the disk 10 for field transport, the process is reversed and the cylinders are extended. Once the disk 10 is in the field transport position as shown in
As seen in
Locating the wing lift wheel assemblies rearwardly of the centerline 70 and the stabilizer wheel assemblies forwardly of the disk assemblies 28 provides excellent machine support and eliminates need for expensive heavy frames. Wing weight is shared by the front stabilizer wheel assemblies 50 and 52 and the rear lift wheel assemblies 34, 44 and 36, 46 during field transport for more balanced wheel loading. Rear attachments, such as coil tine harrows, that shift weight balance to the rear of the disk is more effectively supported by above-described wheel arrangement. The leveling linkage 49 on the hitch 48 provides additional load sharing and stabilizing for the implement.
As shown in
Having described the preferred embodiment, it will become apparent that various modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the accompanying claims.