This invention relates to hand tools such as knives and multitools that incorporate folding implements and which include a liner lock, and more specifically to such a folding tool in which the liner lock includes an adjustment mechanism that allows adjustment of the implement lock up position.
Many types of hand tools such as knives and multitools incorporate folding mechanisms that allow an implement to be moved between a folded position in which the implement is safely stowed in the tool handle, and an extended position in which the implement is ready for work. One typical example of such a folding tool is a knife having a folding blade. The knife handle typically has two opposed handle portions defining a blade-receiving groove. A blade pivots on a shaft attached to the handle such that in a folded position the blade is stowed with the cutting portion of the blade safely in the groove, and such that in an extended position the blade is extended away from the handle, ready for use. Foldable knifes are ubiquitous.
To increase the safety of folding tools such as knives, many such tools incorporate locking mechanisms of one type or another. When the knife blade pivots into the open position, its pivotal movement is stopped with a transverse blade stop pin housed in the handle. Often a locking mechanism is included that prevents the blade from pivoting back from the open into the closed position. There are many types of locking mechanisms. One common type is a “liner lock.” This kind of mechanism relies upon a resilient lever formed as part of a handle liner or the handle scale. When the blade is pivoted to the open or extended position, a forward lock face on the resilient lever engages a cooperatively formed ramp on the tang portion of the blade and thereby locks the blade in the open position.
Most folding knives, including those that use liner locks, are manufactured according to strict manufacturing tolerances. Often these tolerances mandate that there are cumulatively only a few thousandths of an inch tolerance in the assembled product. This means that when manufacturing the numerous parts for a knife, each part has to be within even smaller tolerances for the finished product to meet cumulative specifications. Unfortunately, manufacturing tolerances are not always easily controlled. In a folding knife, out-of-tolerance or near tolerance parts can add up in the finished product and result in an assembled product that does not meet final quality specifications and does not operate properly.
In the example of a folding knife that uses a stop pin and a locking mechanism, if the assembled product is out of specification, the locking mechanism may not engage properly. To remedy this situation, the unit must be repaired to adjust the locking mechanism so it works properly and to bring it within acceptable specifications. With liner lock knives this requires that the knife is disassembled and one or more parts replaced or repaired by milling to bring the part or the assembled product within acceptable specification ranges. For example, with a liner lock the liner lever may need to be milled, or the ramp portion of the blade may be milled, or the liner may need to be replaced. The stop pin may also be milled. But regardless of the process that is used to adjust the blade locking mechanism, disassembly, milling and repair and reassembly are time consuming and expensive. Furthermore, normal use of the knife with multiple opening/closing cycles can lead to wear on the lock face of the liner lock where lock face abuts the tang of the blade. This normal wear can lead to an out-of-tolerance condition. While the wear may be only thousandths of inches, it can be enough to loosen the integrity of the lock up position and thus compromise the integrity and safety of the tool.
One unique and highly effective solution to the problem just described—in fact, patented solution—is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,278,213, which is owned by the owner of the present application. In the '213 patent the knife utilizes a conventional liner lock and the blade stop pin defines a multifaceted face having plural surfaces, each having a radial distance from an axial centerline that is different from adjacent surfaces. Axial rotation of the stop pin is effective to change the diameter of the stop pin and therefore allows for adjustment of the stop position of the blade. The invention described in the '213 patent has been highly commercially successful.
In addition to the issues mentioned above, it is increasingly popular to incorporate bearings in folding tools such as knives that reduce friction between the handle and the blade when the blade moves relative to the handle. For example, there are more and more knives being manufactured that utilize cartridge bearings that encircle the blade pivot pin. While these types of bearings are functionally beneficial to the extent that they reduce rotational friction on the blade, they tend to occupy more real estate, so to speak, within the knife handle. Since many knives include numerous and complex internal mechanical components such as automatic or semi-automatic drive mechanism, the extra space required by bearings may force the knife designer to accommodate the loss of space with changes to the other components.
These combined factors—variable manufacturing tolerances, wear on the lockface of a liner lock, and the needs for economy of part size—contribute to a need for an apparatus that allows adjustment of the implement lockup position in a folding tool that incorporates a liner lock.
The present invention relates to a hand tool handle that incorporates a mechanism for variably adjustment of the lockup position of the implement when it is in the open position.
There is a need, therefore for innovations in the technology involved in locking a blade in the open position in a tool that uses a liner lock. The present invention brings the following advantages and advancements to the technology:
The invention will be better understood and its numerous objects and advantages will be apparent by reference to the following detailed description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the following drawings.
The invention will now be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
A preferred embodiment of a hand tool 10 incorporating a liner lock adjustment mechanism in accordance with the illustrated invention is shown in the figures. Although the invention is described with respect to a particular type of tool—a knife—it will be appreciated that references to this type of a knife, and indeed this particular type of hand tool, are for illustrative purposes to describe the invention. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the invention claimed herein is not limited to knives, but instead extends to any hand tool having the features claimed herein.
Generally, hand tool 10 is defined by an elongate handle 12 and a blade 14 that is pivotally attached to the handle at the “forward” end of handle 12. The opposite end of handle 12 is referred to as rearward or butt end. Other relative directional terms used in this description correspond to this convention: the “rear” or butt end of the handle is opposite the forward end; the “upper” part of the blade is the dull, non-working portion and the “lower” part of the blade is the sharpened, working portion; “inner” or “inward” refers to the structural center of the knife, and so on.
In the figures filed herewith (with the exception of
Knife 10 is in many respects constructed as a conventional knife with a liner locking mechanism. Described generally, the blade 14 of knife 10 includes a tang 22 having a bore 24 through which pivot shaft 16 extends. Specifically, pivot shaft 16 comprises a cylindrical shaft that fits into bore 24 and which interconnects the two handle halves in a conventional manner. The knife 10 illustrated herein utilizes cartridge bearings 26 around the pivot shaft 16 but it will be understood that the invention described herein may be used in knives that do not use bearings with the blade. Blade 14 preferably includes a flipper extension 28 to assist the user with opening and closing the blade.
As seen best in
The handle halves are interconnected in the assembled knife 10 in a conventional manner with fasteners such as screws. A thumb lug 34 is attached to blade 14 and extends from the blade on both sides thereof. When the blade is in the open position, the thumb lug abuts a cooperatively formed notch 36 in the forward end of handle 12; and the thumb lug 34, when it abuts the handle 12 (i.e., in notch 36) thus defines a blade stop that stops rotation of the blade in a fixed position when the blade is in the open position.
The blade locking mechanism, identified generally with reference number 40, will now be described in detail. Handle half 18 is preferably made of a resilient material such as a variety metals and alloys. Handle half 18 comprises an integrally formed, bifurcated sheet comprising a base 42 having an elongate, L-shaped slot 44 extending from the beginning of the slot 44 at a point designated at 46 and extending in a forward direction and turning at a 90° angle at 48 and extending through the edge of the handle half at exit point 50. The elongate slot 44 defines a spring arm 52 having a free end 54 at the forward end of the spring arm and which is an integral part of the handle half 18. The handle half 18 further comprises an elongate fixed body portion 56 opposite of slot 44 from spring arm 52. The inner-facing surface of spring arm 52—that is, the surface of the spring arm that faces the blade-slot—is identified as surface 58.
It will be appreciated that handle half 18 is preferably a one-piece unit and that during fabrication of handle half 18, spring arm 54 is pre-stressed so that the spring arm is given an initial bias inwardly in the direction toward the blade-receiving slot—that is, generally out of the plane of the paper in
With reference to
With returning reference to
Adjustment mechanism 70 is defined by an adjustable lock member or lockface head 72 that is attached to spring arm 52 at its free end 54 in a recessed cavity 74. As seen in
Lockface head 72 will now be described in detail with particular reference to
In the preferred embodiment described in
D
0=0.1250±0004 inches
D
1=0.1240±0004 inches
D
2=0.1230±0004 inches
D
3=0.1220±0004 inches
D
4=0.1210±0004 inches
D
5=0.1280±0004 inches
D
6=0.1270±0004 inches
D
7=0.1260±0004 inches
It will be understood that these dimensions are representative only and that they may be varied depending upon the circumstances. The actual incremental measurement for D0, D1, D2 and so on may be varied according to the requirements of the particular tool in which the lockface head 72 is being used. Moreover, there is no need for the incremental measurement to be the same from one surface to the next. Nonetheless, in the illustrated embodiment the actual increment in each step (i.e., D0, D1, D2, etc.) is preferably about 0.001 inch. In this embodiment, therefore, there is a difference of 0.007 inch between diameter D7 on the one hand, and diameter D4 on the other hand. As detailed below, this incrementally increasing diameter of the lockface head 72 allows for adjustment of the lockup position of liner lock mechanism 40 in the assembled knife.
A reference notch 100 may be formed in one of the surfaces such as surface 90, which is the surface of the lockface head 72 that represents roughly the middle diametrical distance (D0) between the minimal distance defined by D4 and the maximal diametrical distance defined by D5. As detailed below, reference notch 100 functions as a reference point or indicia that may be used used when adjusting the lockup position of the liner lock mechanism 40.
Each of the surfaces 90 through 97 defines a flattened face that has a chamfered edge. With specific reference to
In the assembled knife 10 the portion of the lockface head 72 that makes contact with the surface 32 of face 30 on the tang of the blade when the blade is locked open by the liner locking mechanism is the edge 35 defined by the intersection of the flattened face and the chamfered edge on the pertinent surface. It will be appreciated, however, that the chamfered edge is optional and that the surfaces of the lockface head may be planar. In that case the lockup surface would be the surface of the lockface head that makes contact with the facing surface of the tang of the blade. Moreover, the edge 35 could be defined by a bevel rather than a chamfer.
In operation, when blade 14 is in the closed position the liner lock mechanism 40 (which may incorporate a ball detent 102 in known manners) is biased outwardly by contact between the blade and the spring arm 52, so the spring arm is urged away from the blade slot. Because the spring arm 52 is always pushing inwardly toward the blade slot, the spring arm pushes against the blade and this retains the blade in the slot in the closed position. To open the blade it is rotated from closed toward open (using the blade flipper 28 and/or the thumb lug 24). As best illustrated in the close up drawing of
Rotation of lockface head 72 relative to spring arm 52 is effective to vary the distance between the center of the lockface head and the edge of the lockface head that engages the blade in the open and locked position. Accordingly, the lockface head 72 according to the present invention is operable to change the lockup position of the blade; this is effective as noted above for accommodating variances in manufacturing and wear and the like due to repeated opening and closing cycles. By way of further explanation, the abutting relationship between thumb lug 34 and notch 36 generally does not change over time and over repeated opening and closing cycles because there is relatively little wear between the thumb lug and the notch. However, wear does occur between the lockface head 72 and surface 32 of tang 30 over time and over repeated opening, locking and closing cycles. In this example, and wear occurs there may be a need to adjust the lockup position to account for the wear. This is done by rotating the lockface head so that a selected surface of the lockface head (e.g., surfaces 90-97) that has a greater diameter relative to the previous lockup surface defines the new lockup surface.
As noted, when lockface head 72 is attached to the spring arm 52 in the normal operating position shown in, for example,
In order to adjust the lockup position, screw 76 is loosened so that the lockface head may be rotated. The lockface head is rotated so that a different surface—one that defines a different distance from the centerline to the locking edge—is oriented toward the tang of the blade.
Knife 10 is initially assembled with lockface head 72 oriented on spring arm such that reference notch 100—that is, surface 90—defines the locking surface when the blade 14 is in the open position. The lockup position is checked and ideally there should be no movement of the blade relative to the handle. In other words, the lockup should be highly secure. If there is some play between the blade and the handle, screw 76 is loosened and the lockface head 72 is axially rotated so that a different surface of the lockface head defines the locking surface. For example, by rotating lockface head such that surface 94 defines the locking surface when blade 14 is in the open position, the lockup positon of the engagement between the locking surface of lockface head 72 and the blade will be varied (since, as noted above, diameter D0 is greater than diameter D4. The lockup position of blade 14 may in this way be adjusted to the desired point. This adjustment will be done during initial assembly of knife 10, and is useful as the parts of the knife wear from normal operation during the life of the knife.
As noted above, the incremental distance from one surface of the lockface head to the next may be adjusted according to the needs and manufacturing tolerances of the tool with which the adjustment mechanism is being used. In the embodiment illustrated herein, as noted above, the diametrical distance varies by 0.001 inch with each successive surface (i.e., from surface 90 to surface 91 and so on). With a lockface head having these dimensions, the total adjustment afforded by the mechanism is 0.007 inch, which is adequate adjustment in many manufacturing instances.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that the multi-faced lockface head described herein may be used with any knife that utilizes a liner locking mechanism. Further, the material used to fabricate the lockface head and/or the surface 32 of blade 14 that is engaged by the lockface head may be chosen according to desired wear characteristics. As another modification, the lockface head illustrated and described herein is octagonal in shape—there is no reason why a lockface head having a greater or lesser number of surfaces could not be used with equal effectiveness.
While the present invention has been described in terms of preferred and illustrated embodiments, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill that the spirit and scope of the invention is not limited to those embodiments, but extend to the various modifications and equivalents as defined in the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US16/53872 | 9/27/2016 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62239302 | Oct 2015 | US |