The present application relates to electro-optic displays, with some aspects relating more specifically to control of such displays when using glyphs to display text, characters, and symbols, etc.
Aspects of the present application provide methods for displaying text, characters or symbols, etc. on an electro-optic display in two or more bit depths with little or no variation between hinting. In some embodiments, the same hinting is used to display the same text sequentially at two different bit depths.
According to an aspect of the present application, a method is provided for driving a display, the method comprising displaying on a display, at a first bit depth, textual information, characters or symbols in a font using at least one font hint, and subsequent to displaying the textual information at the first bit depth, displaying the textual information on the display at a second bit depth in the font using the at least one font hint.
According to another aspect of the present application, a method is provided for updating an electro-optic display in a manner that reduces artifacts without increasing flashiness of the display. In some embodiments, a pixel mask is used defining a greater number of pixels to be updated than are included in a glyph being updated.
According to an aspect of the present application, a method of driving a display is provided, the method comprising, for a glyph displayed on the display and occupying a first number of pixels of the display, flashing a second number of pixels of the display encompassing the glyph where the second number of pixels is greater than the first number of pixels. The subset of pixels of the display is less than or equal to a convex hull encompassing the glyph in some embodiments.
Various aspects and embodiments of the application will be described with reference to the following figures. It should be appreciated that the figures are not necessarily drawn to scale. Items appearing in multiple figures are indicated by the same reference number in all the figures in which they appear.
Aspects of the present application provide methods for displaying text, characters or symbols, etc. on an electro-optic display in two or more bit depths with little or no variation between hinting. Another aspect of the present application provides for a method of displaying a glyph having a first number of pixels, then removing the glyph by flashing a second number of pixels of the display encompassing the glyph where the second number of pixels is greater than the first number of pixels.
The term “electro-optic”, as applied to a material or a display, is used herein in its conventional meaning in the imaging art to refer to a material having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, the material being changed from its first to its second display state by application of an electric field to the material. Although the optical property is typically color perceptible to the human eye, it may be another optical property, such as optical transmission, reflectance, luminescence or, in the case of displays intended for machine reading, pseudo-color in the sense of a change in reflectance of electromagnetic wavelengths outside the visible range.
The term “gray state” is used herein in its conventional meaning in the imaging art to refer to a state intermediate two extreme optical states of a pixel, and does not necessarily imply a black-white transition between these two extreme states. For example, an electrophoretic display may have extreme states that are white and deep blue, so that an intermediate “gray state” would actually be pale blue. Indeed, as already mentioned, the change in optical state may not be a color change at all. The terms “black” and “white” may be used hereinafter to refer to the two extreme optical states of a display, and should be understood as normally including extreme optical states which are not strictly black and white, for example the aforementioned white and dark blue states. The term “monochrome” may be used hereinafter to denote a drive scheme which only drives pixels to their two extreme optical states with no intervening gray states.
Some electro-optic materials are solid in the sense that the materials have solid external surfaces, although the materials may, and often do, have internal liquid- or gas-filled spaces. Such displays using solid electro-optic materials may hereinafter for convenience be referred to as “solid electro-optic displays”. Thus, the term “solid electro-optic displays” includes rotating bichromal member displays, encapsulated electrophoretic displays, microcell electrophoretic displays and encapsulated liquid crystal displays.
The terms “bistable” and “bistability” are used herein in their conventional meaning in the art to refer to displays comprising display elements having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, and such that after any given element has been driven, by means of an addressing pulse of finite duration, to assume either its first or second display state, after the addressing pulse has terminated, that state will persist for at least several times, for example at least four times, the minimum duration of the addressing pulse required to change the state of the display element. It is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,170,670 that some particle-based electrophoretic displays capable of gray scale are stable not only in their extreme black and white states but also in their intermediate gray states, and the same is true of some other types of electro-optic displays. This type of display is properly called “multi-stable” rather than bistable, although for convenience the term “bistable” may be used herein to cover both bistable and multi-stable displays.
Several types of electro-optic displays are known. One type of electro-optic display is a rotating bichromal member type as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,808,783; 5,777,782; 5,760,761; 6,054,071 6,055,091; 6,097,531; 6,128,124; 6,137,467; and 6,147,791 (although this type of display is often referred to as a “rotating bichromal ball” display, the term “rotating bichromal member” is preferred as more accurate since in some of the patents mentioned above the rotating members are not spherical). Such a display uses a large number of small bodies (typically spherical or cylindrical) which have two or more sections with differing optical characteristics, and an internal dipole. These bodies are suspended within liquid-filled vacuoles within a matrix, the vacuoles being filled with liquid so that the bodies are free to rotate. The appearance of the display is changed by applying an electric field thereto, thus rotating the bodies to various positions and varying which of the sections of the bodies is seen through a viewing surface. This type of electro-optic medium is typically bistable.
Another type of electro-optic display uses an electrochromic medium, for example an electrochromic medium in the form of a nanochromic film comprising an electrode formed at least in part from a semi-conducting metal oxide and a plurality of dye molecules capable of reversible color change attached to the electrode; see, for example O'Regan, B., et al., Nature 1991, 353, 737; and Wood, D., Information Display, 18(3), 24 (March 2002). See also Bach, U., et al., Adv. Mater., 2002, 14(11), 845. Nanochromic films of this type are also described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,301,038; 6,870,657; and 6,950,220. This type of medium is also typically bistable.
Another type of electro-optic display is an electro-wetting display developed by Philips and described in Hayes, R. A., et al., “Video-Speed Electronic Paper Based on Electrowetting”, Nature, 425, 383-385 (2003). It is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,420,549 that such electro-wetting displays can be made bistable.
One type of electro-optic display, which has been the subject of intense research and development for a number of years, is the particle-based electrophoretic display, in which a plurality of charged particles move through a fluid under the influence of an electric field. Electrophoretic displays can have attributes of good brightness and contrast, wide viewing angles, state bistability, and low power consumption when compared with liquid crystal displays. Nevertheless, problems with the long-term image quality of these displays have prevented their widespread usage. For example, particles that make up electrophoretic displays tend to settle, resulting in inadequate service-life for these displays.
Numerous patents and applications assigned to or in the names of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and E Ink Corporation describe various technologies used in encapsulated electrophoretic and other electro-optic media. Such encapsulated media comprise numerous small capsules, each of which itself comprises an internal phase containing electrophoretically-mobile particles in a fluid medium, and a capsule wall surrounding the internal phase. Typically, the capsules are themselves held within a polymeric binder to form a coherent layer positioned between two electrodes. The technologies described in these patents and applications include:
(a) Electrophoretic particles, fluids and fluid additives; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,002,728 and 7,679,814;
(b) Capsules, binders and encapsulation processes; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,922,276 and 7,411,719;
(c) Films and sub-assemblies containing electro-optic materials; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,982,178 and 7,839,564;
(d) Backplanes, adhesive layers and other auxiliary layers and methods used in displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,116,318 and 7,535,624;
(e) Color formation and color adjustment; see for example U.S. Pat. No. 7,075,502 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0109219;
(f) Methods for driving displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,930,026; 6,445,489; 6,504,524; 6,512,354; 6,531,997; 6,753,999; 6,825,970; 6,900,851; 6,995,550; 7,012,600; 7,023,420; 7,034,783; 7,116,466; 7,119,772; 7,193,625; 7,202,847; 7,259,744; 7,304,787; 7,312,794; 7,327,511; 7,453,445; 7,492,339; 7,528,822; 7,545,358; 7,583,251; 7,602,374; 7,612,760; 7,679,599; 7,688,297; 7,729,039; 7,733,311; 7,733,335; 7,787,169; 7,952,557; 7,956,841; 7,999,787; 8,077,141; 8,125,501; 8,139,050; 8,174,490; 8,289,250; 8,300,006; 8,305,341; 8,314,784; 8,384,658; 8,558,783; and 8,558,785; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2003/0102858; 2005/0122284; 2005/0253777; 2007/0091418; 2007/0103427; 2008/0024429; 2008/0024482; 2008/0136774; 2008/0291129; 2009/0174651; 2009/0179923; 2009/0195568; 2009/0322721; 2010/0220121; 2010/0265561; 2011/0193840; 2011/0193841; 2011/0199671; 2011/0285754; and 2013/0194250;
(g) Applications of displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,312,784 and 8,009,348; and
(h) Non-electrophoretic displays, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,241,921; 6,950,220; 7,420,549 and 8,319,759; and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0293858.
Another type of electrophoretic display is a so-called “microcell electrophoretic display”. In a microcell electrophoretic display, the charged particles and the fluid are not encapsulated within microcapsules but instead are retained within a plurality of cavities formed within a carrier medium, typically a polymeric film. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,672,921 and 6,788,449, both assigned to Sipix Imaging, Inc.
Other types of electro-optic materials may also be used in aspects of the present application. Of particular interest, bistable ferroelectric liquid crystal displays (FLC's) are known in the art
An electro-optic display normally comprises a layer of electro-optic material and at least two other layers disposed on opposed sides of the electro-optic material, one of these two layers being an electrode layer. In most such displays both the layers are electrode layers, and one or both of the electrode layers are patterned to define the pixels of the display. For example, one electrode layer may be patterned into elongate row electrodes and the other into elongate column electrodes running at right angles to the row electrodes, the pixels being defined by the intersections of the row and column electrodes. Alternatively, and more commonly, one electrode layer has the form of a single continuous electrode and the other electrode layer is patterned into a matrix of pixel electrodes, each of which defines one pixel of the display. In another type of electro-optic display, which is intended for use with a stylus, print head or similar movable electrode separate from the display, only one of the layers adjacent the electro-optic layer comprises an electrode, the layer on the opposed side of the electro-optic layer typically being a protective layer intended to prevent the movable electrode damaging the electro-optic layer.
The term L star may be used herein, and may be represented by “L*”. L* has the usual CIE definition: L*=116(R/R0)1/3−16, where R is the reflectance and R0 is a standard reflectance value.
The term “impulse” is used herein in its conventional meaning of the integral of voltage with respect to time. However, some bistable electro-optic media act as charge transducers, and with such media an alternative definition of impulse, namely the integral of current over time (which is equal to the total charge applied) may be used. The appropriate definition of impulse should be used, depending on whether the medium acts as a voltage-time impulse transducer or a charge impulse transducer.
A complication in driving electrophoretic displays is the need for so-called “DC balance”. As discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,531,997 and 6,504,524, problems may be encountered, and the working lifetime of a display reduced, if the method used to drive the display does not result in zero, or near zero, net time-averaged applied electric field across the electro-optic medium. A drive method which does result in zero net time-averaged applied electric field across the electro-optic medium is conveniently referred to a “direct current balanced” or “DC balanced”.
As already noted, an encapsulated electrophoretic medium typically comprises electrophoretic capsules disposed in a polymeric binder, which serves to form the discrete capsules into a coherent layer. The continuous phase in a polymer-dispersed electrophoretic medium, and the cell walls of a microcell medium serve similar functions. It has been found by E Ink researchers that the specific material used as the binder in an electrophoretic medium can affect the electro-optic properties of the medium. Among the electro-optic properties of an electrophoretic medium affected by the choice of binder is the so-called “dwell time dependence,” discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,119,772 (see especially
Some of the discussion below will focus on methods for driving one or more pixels of an electro-optic display through a transition from an initial gray level to a final gray level (which may or may not be different from the initial gray level). The term “waveform” will be used to denote the entire voltage against time curve used to effect the transition from one specific initial gray level to a specific final gray level. Typically such a waveform will comprise a plurality of waveform elements; where these elements are essentially rectangular (i.e., where a given element comprises application of a constant voltage for a period of time); the elements may be called “pulses” or “drive pulses”. The term “drive scheme” denotes a set of waveforms sufficient to effect all possible transitions between gray levels for a specific display. A display may make use of more than one drive scheme; for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,012,600 teaches that a drive scheme may need to be modified depending upon parameters such as the temperature of the display or the time for which it has been in operation during its lifetime, and thus a display may be provided with a plurality of different drive schemes to be used at differing temperature etc. A set of drive schemes used in this manner may be referred to as “a set of related drive schemes.” It is also possible to use more than one drive scheme simultaneously in different areas of the same display, and a set of drive schemes used in this manner may be referred to as “a set of simultaneous drive schemes.”
The inventors have appreciated that when displaying text on electro-optic displays, among others, there is sometimes a compromise between the time it takes to display the text and the quality of the text displayed, both of which can depend on the bit depth used for the text. Text displayed with a lower bit depth may appear more pixelated than the same text displayed with a higher bit depth. However, more time may be needed to drive the display when a higher bit depth is used. The bit depth selected for displaying text may depend on preferences for the overall user experience. For example, when text is displayed quickly, such as when flipping among pages on an electronic display, such as when using an e-reader, the text may be displayed in 1-bit (black and white) depth. When the text is displayed with a better quality, more time is needed to display the text to a higher bit depth, such as a 4-bit gray scale. Thus, one approach for displaying text in the context in which a user expects high speed and high quality is to initially display the text in a low bit depth (e.g., 1-bit depth) and then update the same text to a higher quality bit depth (e.g., 4-bit depth) to provide better viewing of the text.
However, the inventors have recognized that standard font rendering algorithms produce inconsistencies between a high bit depth text and a low bit depth text displayed in the same font. For example, the size of a text character or glyph may change between two different bit depths. As a result, if a page of text displayed in one bit depth is changed to a different bit depth, the location of the glyphs that make up the text may change to accommodate this change in size due to the different bit depth. Additional font elements, such as stems and serifs, may be dictated by, or even removed or reduced by, font instructions or font hints. Inconsistencies may arise because the font hinting to display glyphs differs between lower and higher bit depths.
Thus, aspects of the present application disclose techniques to render fonts at different bit depths where inconsistencies between characteristics, such as the font hinting at different bit depths, are reduced or eliminated entirely. In some embodiments, the same font hints are used for more than one bit depth. Using such techniques, text displayed on a display (e.g., an electrophoretic display) may be displayed quickly with a low bit depth and changed to a higher bit depth without noticeable change in the text, which may improve user experience.
Additionally, the inventors have recognized that changing the text displayed on some electronic displays, such as on an electro-optic display, may produce artifacts as pixels change from one pixel color or value to another. Text on the display is a series of characters or glyphs. A portion of the pixels on the display are driven to a non-white pixel value to display each glyph, often gray or black, although other colors are possible. When text is changed on the display, such as changing to another page (for instance, on an e-reader), some of the pixels displaying the glyphs may change value to display the new text. The white pixels adjacent to the non-white pixels (e.g., black and/or gray pixels) may produce artifacts when the new text is displayed. Such artifacts may include edge ghosting where the edges of previous text glyphs remain on the display. Such artifacts may accumulate over time as the display undergoes repeated text updates.
Previous techniques to reduce the presence of edge ghosting include a global updating of all the pixels on the display to a same pixel value, such as white, before displaying new text. In some situations, multiple global updates are performed to ensure removal of artifacts. However, such a global update technique produces a flashing display which may be undesirable to readers. Flashiness may result from actively driving all pixels or a subset of pixels to a same pixel value or may result from actively driving all pixels or a subset of pixels to a next image. As used herein, the term actively driving a pixel to a value (i.e., gray level) does not include null transitions or zero voltage transitions.
Aspects of the present application provide techniques to both reduce the presence of edge ghosting and reduce the flashiness of the display. Such techniques include defining a region of pixels that includes the pixels in the glyph and some pixels adjacent to the glyph to be changed to white before updating the entire display to new text. The region of the pixels in the glyph and the pixels adjacent to the glyph may be called a mask. By using such a mask, the number of white-black and/or white-gray boundaries are reduced and updating the pixels within the mask may reduce the presence of edge ghosting. Using such a mask may reduce the appearance of flashiness because only a portion of the pixels are brought to white but still maintains a level of accuracy in the displayed text.
The aspects and embodiments described above, as well as additional aspects and embodiments, are described further below. These aspects and/or embodiments may be used individually, all together, or in any combination of two or more, as the application is not limited in this respect.
Aspects of the present application relate to methods and apparatus for driving a display with electro-optic media which are sensitive to the polarity of electric field applied. Such a display may include any suitable electro-optic display, including electrophoretic displays, rotating bichromal member displays, and devices that have such electro-optic displays, such as e-readers and e-paper. An example apparatus that may use aspects of the present application is shown in
A cross-sectional view of an example display architecture (e.g., of electro-optic display 26) is shown in
The electro-optic layer may include any suitable electro-optic media. In the example shown in
Any suitable method and apparatus for driving the voltage signals applied to the pixel electrodes and common electrode may be used.
As previously described, when the pixel value for a pixel is changed to a different value, a previously applied voltage of the pixel or pixel value may influence the current pixel value.
Techniques for improving (e.g., increasing) the time of displaying text may include displaying the text quickly with a low bit depth and changing to a higher bit depth without noticeable change in the text. A computer font includes a font data file with outlines and hints to be used when displaying glyphs on a display. Specific instructions or hints may remain consistent among different bit depths, allowing for text to be displayed in a consistent manner between different bit depths. These hints may include size, kerning, stem thickness, arm thickness, glyph spacing, glyph width, glyph height, ascender length, descender length, and serif thickness. Such hints may be made consistent among text displayed in a low-bit depth and a high-bit depth in order to reduce inconsistencies among different bit depths, according to an aspect of the present application.
Examples of glyphs where consistent font hinting is applied to 1-bit (e.g. A2) and multi-bit depth (e.g. GC16) are shown in
An example sans serif font for both multi-bit font depth text 502 and 1-bit font depth text 504 is shown in
An example serif font (Times New Roman) for both a multi-bit font depth 602 and a 1-bit font depth 604 are shown in
In some embodiments, a technique for implementing the font pairs as rendered above in
In some embodiments, font hints may be specifically designed and/or selected for more than one bit-depth in order to reduce inconsistencies among different bit depths. Such designed hints may be selected from pre-existing hints used in a font file for a particular font or bit-depth and/or may be uniquely designed. The designed font hints may be used to render text in a font at different bit depths.
In some embodiments, a thresholding algorithm may be applied to render a font for multiple bit depths. Displaying text in a 1-bit depth font may include rendering the text at a multi-bit depth and applying a thresholding algorithm to convert the multi-bit depth text to 1-bit depth text. Such a thresholding algorithm may include applying a threshold value to multi-bit depth text and pixels that form the text are converted to 1-bit values based on the threshold value. For an example, pixel values above the threshold value are converted to white pixels while pixels below the threshold value are converted to black pixels to render the text in 1-bit depth.
In some embodiments, different waveforms or voltage signals may be used to render text for multiple bit depths. The waveforms may be designed for speed of displaying the text on the display and/or quality of the rendered text. As an example, one waveform may render text quickly, but the text may have poor quality, and another waveform may render text over a longer period of time with higher quality. Thus, various techniques may be used to render text in different bit depths while reducing differences in appearance.
The present application also includes techniques for reducing artifacts when text is updated to new information while reducing the flashiness of the display. An update mask may be applied to each rendered glyph for a particular font. The mask may include pixels other than the pixels in the rendered glyph. The additional pixels may be pixels adjacent to the pixels in the glyph. When text information is updated on a display, pixels within the mask may be updated to a pixel value, such as white, before or during the display of new text. Areas outside the update mask, i.e., background pixels, will likely transition from white to white, such that they may not flash and, since they are transitioning from white to white, may not be updated. The update mask may be created in any suitable manner, such as through an algorithm or by a user. The update mask may be created while the font is being rendered, as part of the rendering process, and/or after the font is rendered on a display.
A mask may be formed for a particular glyph based on reducing overall flashiness and/or improving quality of the displayed text. The mask may reduce the number of edges in the updated area to reduce overall edge artifacts. The mask may also fill in enclosed areas within glyphs and/or fill in areas outside glyphs but, for example, within the convex hull. The convex hull of a set X of points in the Euclidean space or plane is the smallest convex set that contains X. When X is a bounded subset of the plane, the convex hull may be visualized as the shape formed by a rubber band stretched around X. This may be referred to as the convex envelope. More formally, the convex hull may be defined as the intersection of all convex sets containing X or as the set of all convex combinations of points in X. In some instances, the length of the edges may be considered and a mask may be designed to reduce continuous straight edges in order to minimize the visibility of edge artifacts. Since there is some increase in flashiness of the overall screen by including pixels outside the bounds of a pixelated glyph in the update, the mask may be optimized to account for a balance of flashiness and edge reduction level. An update mask may be formed based on an edge reduction level where the edge reduction level may be determined based on the total edges in the mask and the number of pixels in the mask that are updated. Such an edge reduction level for a particular mask may be determined from a ratio of the difference between the number of edges in a pixelated glyph and the mask to the difference between the number of pixels in the mask and the pixelated glyph. Additionally or alternatively, the corner where two edges meet may show stronger ghosting than other areas, and a mask may be chosen to minimize the amount of corners for the updated area. In some embodiments, a mask may include areas of consecutive characters and may be defined by how certain glyphs are connected to each other.
As an example, mask 802 in
Thus, it should be appreciated that the particular mask chosen for a given update may be selected based on the number of edges and/or corners in the mask and the total number of pixels being updated by application of the mask. In this manner, artifacts (e.g., edge artifacts) may be minimized without an unacceptable increase in flashiness.
Having thus described several aspects and embodiments of the technology of this application, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the technology described in the application. For example, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily envision a variety of other means and/or structures for performing the function and/or obtaining the results and/or one or more of the advantages described herein, and each of such variations and/or modifications is deemed to be within the scope of the embodiments described herein. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments described herein. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, inventive embodiments may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. In addition, any combination of two or more features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods described herein, if such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the scope of the present disclosure.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/100,769 filed on Jan. 30, 2015. The entire contents of this and all other U.S. patents and published and applications mentioned below are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5315696 | Case | May 1994 | A |
5315698 | Case | May 1994 | A |
5321810 | Case | Jun 1994 | A |
5416898 | Opstad | May 1995 | A |
5594809 | Kopec | Jan 1997 | A |
5760761 | Sheridon | Jun 1998 | A |
5777782 | Sheridon | Jul 1998 | A |
5808783 | Crowley | Sep 1998 | A |
5864711 | Mairs | Jan 1999 | A |
5930026 | Jacobson | Jul 1999 | A |
6054071 | Mikkelsen, Jr. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055091 | Sheridon | Apr 2000 | A |
6097531 | Sheridon | Aug 2000 | A |
6128124 | Silverman | Oct 2000 | A |
6137467 | Sheridon | Oct 2000 | A |
6147791 | Sheridon | Nov 2000 | A |
6157750 | Choi | Dec 2000 | A |
6241921 | Jacobson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6301038 | Fitzmaurice | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6445489 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6504524 | Gates | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512354 | Jacobson | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6531997 | Gates | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6672921 | Liang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6753999 | Zehner | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6788449 | Liang | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6825970 | Goenaga | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6870657 | Fitzmaurice et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6900851 | Morrison et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6922276 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6950220 | Abramson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6982178 | LeCain et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995550 | Jacobson | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002728 | Pullen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7012600 | Zehner | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023420 | Comiskey et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034783 | Gates | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7075502 | Drzaic | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7116318 | Amundson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7116466 | Whitesides et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7119772 | Amundson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136067 | Stamm | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7170670 | Webber | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7193625 | Danner et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202847 | Gates | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7259744 | Arango | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7304787 | Whitesides et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312784 | Baucom et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312794 | Zehner | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7327511 | Whitesides et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7411719 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7420549 | Jacobson | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7453445 | Amundson | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7492339 | Amundson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7528822 | Amundson | May 2009 | B2 |
7535624 | Amundson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7545358 | Gates et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7583251 | Arango | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7583267 | Stamm et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598955 | Dowling et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7602374 | Zehner et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612760 | Kawai | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7679599 | Kawai | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7679814 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7688297 | Zehner et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7729039 | LeCain et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7733311 | Amundson | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7733335 | Zehner et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7787169 | Abramson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7839564 | Whitesides et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7868888 | Dowling et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7952557 | Amundson et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7956841 | Albert | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7999787 | Amundson | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009348 | Zehner | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8077141 | Duthaler | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8125501 | Amundson | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8139050 | Jacobson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8174490 | Whitesides | May 2012 | B2 |
8289250 | Zehner | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8300006 | Zhou | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305341 | Arango | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8314784 | Ohkami | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8319759 | Jacobson | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8384658 | Albert | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8558783 | Wilcox | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8558785 | Zehner | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8928562 | Gates et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9230492 | Harrington | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9230514 | Bacus | Jan 2016 | B1 |
20030102858 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050067498 | Smith | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050099649 | Ferlitsch | May 2005 | A1 |
20050253777 | Zehner et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070091418 | Danner et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103427 | Zhou | May 2007 | A1 |
20080024429 | Zehner | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024482 | Gates | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080136774 | Harris | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080291129 | Harris | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090174651 | Jacobson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090179923 | Amundson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195568 | Sjodin | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090322721 | Zehner | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100141670 | Cohen | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100220121 | Zehner | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265561 | Gates et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100275161 | DiCamillo | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100315431 | Smith et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110193840 | Amundson | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110193841 | Amundson | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110199671 | Amundson | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120092454 | Tourapis | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120293858 | Telfer | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130194250 | Amundson | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140002428 | Letourneur | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140218388 | Higgins | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150131126 | Daniels | May 2015 | A1 |
20150262347 | Duerksen | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160104457 | Wu | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160110905 | Kurzweil | Apr 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Wood, D., “An Electrochromic Renaissance?” Information Display, 18(3), 24 (Mar. 2002) Mar. 1, 2002. |
O'Regan, B. et al., “A Low Cost, High-efficiency Solar Cell Based on Dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 Films”, Nature, vol. 353, Oct. 24, 1991, 773-740 Oct. 24, 1991. |
Bach, U., et al., “Nanomaterials-Based Electrochromics for Paper-Quality Displays”, Adv. Mater, 14(11), 845 (2002) Jun. 5, 2002. |
Hayes, R.A., et al., “Video-Speed Electronic Paper Based on Electrowetting”, Nature, vol. 425, Sep. 25, pp. 383-385 (2003) Sep. 25, 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160314766 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62109769 | Jan 2015 | US |