Food processing apparatus and corresponding food processing method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12144358
  • Patent Number
    12,144,358
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 9, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 19, 2024
    a month ago
Abstract
A food processing apparatus for processing food products, in particular meat products, includes a press for pressing the food products with specific pressing parameters and a control unit which is connected on its output side to the press and sets the pressing parameters. A first analyzing device for analyzing the food products before pressing and for generating corresponding first analysis parameters of the food products is provided. The first analysis parameters represent product properties of the analyzed food product. The control unit is connected to the first analyzing device and sets the pressing parameters depending on the first analysis parameters.
Description

This application is a 35 U.S.C. 371 application based upon PCT/EP2020/060159 filed on Apr. 9, 2020, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The invention concerns a food processing apparatus and a corresponding food processing method for processing food products, such as meat products.


In industrial meat production, pieces of meat from a cutting plant are cut into portions and then packaged. Furthermore, it is known from the state of the art that the pieces of meat are pressed before cutting, which significantly enhances the subsequent cutting and packaging. For example, pressing the usually irregularly shaped pieces of meat from the cutting plant results in a regular product shape, which can be block-shaped, for example. This considerably reduces cutting losses due to cuts and end cuts during the subsequent slicing process. Pressing the pieces of meat before slicing thus increases the product yield during slicing. In addition, cutting portions to a predefined weight, creating a desired portion size and presenting them in the package is improved by pressing.


A problem with this well-known pressing is the fact that the pieces of meat from the cutting plant vary greatly in shape, size, weight and composition (flesh, fat, bone, gristle). The range of variation of the pieces of meat arriving from the cutting plant must therefore be taken into account when pressing the pieces of meat. The so-called dynamic pressing is known from the state of the art. The pieces of meat are pressed in a pressing chamber in three pressing axes, whereby the pressing process can be adjusted with regard to the pressing force, the pressing speed, the pressing travel and the pressing travel profile (pressing travel-time characteristic) in order to achieve an optimum pressing result. During pressing in particular, the longitudinal and vertical axes communicate via the meat product in terms of pressure. The vertical axis adapts its pressing travel profile to the pressure and expansion of the meat product. Usually, certain pressing parameters for a product category (e.g. raw ham) are optimized and then maintained during the subsequent pressing of the products of this product category.


However, the problem with this well-known dynamic press is the fact that meat products in the same product category also have a considerable variation in shape, size, weight and composition (flesh, fat, bone, gristle), whereas meat products in the same product category are pressed with constant pressing parameters. If, for example, a meat product is particularly large, pressing with the specified pressing parameters can lead to the breaking of bones in the meat product, which is undesirable.


Finally, reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 8,166,856 B2 and DE 102 20 006 A1 regarding the technological background of the invention.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention is therefore based on the task of achieving better results when pressing food products (e.g. meat products) in industrial food production.


This task is solved by a food processing apparatus in accordance with the invention or by a food processing method in accordance with the invention in accordance with the independent claims.


The food processing apparatus according to the invention initially has a press in accordance with the state of the art to press food products with certain pressing parameters (e.g. pressing force, pressing travel, pressing travel profiles).


In addition, the food processing apparatus according to the invention has a control unit which is connected to the press on the output side and sets the pressing parameters of the press so that the pressing process is carried out in accordance with the specified pressing parameters.


The food processing apparatus according to the invention is characterized by a first analyzing device (e.g. scanner), which analyzes the food product before pressing and generates corresponding first analysis parameters, whereby the first analysis parameters reflect product properties of the analyzed food product.


The control unit is connected on the input side with the first analyzing device and receives the first analysis parameters, while the control unit sets the pressing parameters depending on the first analysis parameters.


In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the control unit can set the maximum pressing force with which the respective food product is pressed as the pressing parameter. The maximum pressing force can be set in a single pressing axis. Preferably, however, the maximum pressing force is specified in three pressing axes which are aligned transversely to each other, in particular at right angles to each other. However, it is also possible within the scope of the invention that the press has a rotary mechanism so that the various pressing axes are not perpendicular to each other.


Furthermore, within the scope of the invention, it is possible for the control unit to set the pressing travel in at least one pressing axis as a pressing parameter. The term “pressing travel” or “forming travel” does not refer to the pressing travel of press jaws. Rather, the term pressing travel in the context of the invention refers to the pressing travel performed by the pressed food product itself. Here, too, the pressing travel can be specified in a single pressing axis. Preferably, however, the pressing travel is specified in three pressing axes which are aligned transversely to each other, in particular at right angles to each other.


The invention also offers the possibility of setting the pressing time as the pressing parameter, i.e. the duration of a pressing process. For example, with a low degree of forming, the pressing time may be very short, i.e. the pressing process takes place very quickly, which enables a high product throughput. With a high degree of forming, on the other hand, it may be necessary to press relatively slowly, i.e. with a long pressing time. This reduces the product throughput, but prevents the food product from being damaged, e.g. by breaking the product or breaking a bone in the food product.


Furthermore, the invention also offers the possibility of massaging the food products during pressing. It is also possible to press in stages.


In addition, the invention also offers the possibility of specifying a pressing force-time curve as a pressing parameter, which shows the course of the pressing force as a function of the pressing time in at least one pressing axis. Here, too, it is possible that the pressing force-time curve is only specified in a single pressing axis. Preferably, however, the pressing force-time curve is specified in three pressing axes which are aligned transversely to each other, in particular at right angles to each other.


For example, the press result can also be improved by setting a comprehensive behavior model of the pressing axes and not a fixed profile, e.g. that the height gives way to a certain behavior when pressing with the length. Furthermore, certain food products are massaged with force. This allows considerable improvements to be achieved in the shaping of the product.


In addition, it is also possible for the control unit to set a pressing travel-time curve as a pressing parameter, which shows the course of the pressing travel in relation to the pressing time in at least one pressing axis. Here, too, it is preferably intended that the pressing travel-time curve is specified in three pressing axes which are aligned transversely to each other, in particular at right angles to each other.


In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the control unit determines an actual shape of the food products from the first analysis parameters before pressing. In addition, the control unit receives a desired target shape of the food products as input information, whereby the desired target shape can be specified, for example, by a downstream slicing device or by a downstream packaging device. The control unit then preferably determines from the specified target shape and from the determined actual shape of the respective food product the degree of deformation required to press the food product from the actual shape into the desired target shape. It has already been briefly mentioned above that with a high degree of deformation there is a risk that the food product will be damaged, for example by a bone fracture in the food product. The control unit can prevent such damage to the food product by adjusting the pressing parameters depending on the degree of deformation required. For example, the pressing time can be extended and the pressing speed reduced if a high degree of deformation is required, as the risk of damage to the pressed food product is lower with slow pressing.


In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the pressed products are analyzed not only before pressing, but also after pressing. For this purpose, a second analyzing device (e.g. scanner) is preferably provided, which analyzes the food products after pressing and generates corresponding second analysis parameters, which reproduce the product characteristics of the pressed food product. The control unit then sets the pressing parameter preferably not only depending on the analysis before pressing, but also depending on the analysis after pressing.


In the post-press analysis, the control unit can also detect whether the pressed food product has broken during the pressing process by analyzing the second analysis parameters, for example with a complete splitting of the food product or with a bone fracture in the food product. If such a fracture is detected, the control unit will preferably adjust the pressing parameters so that food products of the same product type are not subsequently fractured.


The first or second analyzing device is preferably a scanner, in particular an optical scanner or an X-ray scanner, which scans the food products and determines at least one of the following product characteristics:

    • Length of the food product,
    • Width of the food product,
    • Height of the food product,
    • Volume of the food product,
    • Form of the food product,
    • Fat content of the food product,
    • Bone content of the food product,
    • Lean meat content of the food product and/or
    • Bone volume of the food product,
    • Bone form of the food product,
    • Presence of a brow of the food product.


Such scanners are known from the state of the art and therefore do not need to be described in detail.


In addition, the first or second analyzing device may have a temperature measuring device which measures the temperature of the food products as a product characteristic. For example, this temperature measurement can be carried out using a thermal imaging camera.


Furthermore, the first or second analyzing device or the control unit can carry out a forcedisplacement measurement to determine the product strength, whereby the modulus of elasticity or the hardness of the food product is measured. For example, the freezing point of meat can vary considerably due to the different salt content of the meat product. However, the freezing point is the decisive factor during pressing, as the forming process is only maintained in this temperature range or below.


Further, the pressing parameters can be fed back from the press to the control unit, which then derives other product parameters from the pressing parameters. For example, the percentage of the frozen part of the product, the percentage of the unfrozen part of the product or the viscosity of the product can be derived from the measured pressing parameters.


For the sake of completeness, it should be mentioned that the food processing apparatus according to the invention preferably also has a slicing device to cut the pressed food products after pressing. Such slicing devices are known from the state of the art and are also referred to as “slicers”.


In addition, the food processing apparatus according to the invention may also include a packaging device for packaging the pressed and sliced food products. For example, the food products can be placed in trays. For example, the packaging device can be a so-called thermoformer, as it is known from the state of the art.


Furthermore, the food processing apparatus according to the invention preferably also includes a conveyor (e.g. conveyor belt) to convey the food products along a conveyor path. Preferably, the conveyor path conveys the food products successively through the first analyzing device, through the press, through the second analyzing device, through the slicing device and finally into the packaging device.


In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the press comprises a press chamber in which the products are pressed by movable dies. Here, the scanning chamber has an adjustable degree of opening for receiving products of different sizes. For receiving a large product, the pressing chamber is opened relatively wide and for receiving a small product, the scanning chamber is opened relatively little. Further, the first analyzing device is preferably a scanner (e.g. optical scanner, X-ray scanner) which determines the size of the incoming products. Therefore, the first analysis parameters provided by the scanner reflect the size of the incoming products. The control unit then adjusts the opening degree of the pressing chamber according to the size of the product to be pressed. On the hand, an unnecessary wide opening of the pressing chamber is avoided in this way. This allows a reduction of the cycle time, i.e. the number of products pressed per time unit. On the other hand, the adjustment of the opening degree makes sure that products of different sizes can be pressed in the pressing chamber.


In addition to the food processing apparatus according to the invention described above, the invention also claims protection for a corresponding food processing method. The individual process steps of the food processing method according to the invention already result from the above description, so that a separate description of the individual steps can be dispensed with at this point.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Other beneficial further modifications of the invention are explained in more detail below together with the description of the preferred embodiment of the invention on the basis of the figures. They show:



FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of a food processing apparatus according to the invention,



FIG. 2 shows a flow chart to illustrate the food processing method according to the invention,



FIG. 3A shows different pressing travel-time curves,



FIG. 3B shows various pressing force-time curves,



FIG. 3C shows different pressing travel-time curves for different degrees of deformation,



FIG. 4A schematically shows the pressing of a relatively large product, so that the pressing chamber is opened relatively wide, and



FIG. 4B schematically shows the pressing of a relatively small product, so that the pressing chamber is opened relatively little.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of a food processing apparatus according to the invention for pressing, cutting and packaging food products, where a food product 1 is shown before pressing and a food product 2 is shown after pressing.


The food products 1, 2 are conveyed by a conveyor 3 in the direction of the arrow through the food processing apparatus, first through an optical scanner 4, through a press 5, through another optical scanner 6, through a slicing device 7 (“slicer”) and finally into a packaging machine 8, which packs the pressed and sliced food products 2 in trays. For this purpose, the packaging machine 8 can, for example, be designed as a thermoformer.


The optical scanner 4 optically scans the unpressed food products 1 before pressing and thus determines, for example, length, width, height, volume, shape, fat content, bone content, lean meat content and bone volume of the unpressed food products 1. The scanner 4 then outputs the corresponding analysis parameters to a control unit 9, whereby the control unit 9 controls the press 5 with the corresponding pressing parameters, as described in detail below. For example, the control unit 9 controls the degree of opening of the press 5, which will be explained later in detail with reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B.


The scanner 6 optically scans the pressed food products 2 after pressing and also transmits corresponding analysis parameters to the control unit so that the control unit 9 can adjust the pressing parameters accordingly, as described in detail below.


The slicing device 7 then cuts the pressed food products 2 into slices and forwards the sliced stacks to the downstream packaging machine 8, which then packs the sliced food products 2.


It should be noted that both the cutting unit 7 and the packaging machine 8 pass on targets for the optimum product shape to the control unit 9. Packaging in trays with a certain tray size usually requires a certain product shape that is optimally suited.


In addition, the cutter 7 also has a preferred product shape, which is passed on to the control unit 9 so that the control unit 9 can optimise the pressing parameters accordingly.


In the following, the flow diagram shown in FIG. 2 is used to describe the food processing method according to the invention that can be carried out by the food processing apparatus as shown in FIG. 1.


In a first step S1, the conveyor 3 feeds the unpressed food products 1 into the scanner 4.


In the scanner 4, the unpressed food products 1 are then scanned in a step S2, generating corresponding analysis parameters.


In a step S3, pressing parameters are determined that are to be used to press the food product 1.


On the one hand, the analysis parameters previously determined by the scanner 4 are taken into account. This includes, for example, the product shape of the food products 1 before pressing. The pressing parameters also include the required degree of opening of the pressing chamber 13 of the press 5. For receiving a large product, the pressing chamber 13 is opened relatively wide and for receiving a small product, the scanning chamber 13 is opened relatively little.


On the other hand, when determining the pressing parameters in step S3, the shape of the food products 2 after pressing is also taken into account, whereby this product shape is determined in step S7 by the second scanner 6.


In addition, when determining the pressing parameters in step S3, the targets set by the slicing device 7 and the packaging machine 8 are also taken into account.


In a step S4, the food product 1 is then conveyed into the press 5.


In a step S5, the food product 1 is then pressed in the press 5 with the specified pressing parameters.


During the pressing process, the control unit 9 receives a feedback from the press 5, which enables the control unit 9 to evaluate the pressing process. For example, the press 5 reports actual values of the pressing force and the pressing travel to the control unit 9. The control unit can then calculate the product strength, which also reflects the degree of freezing of the pressed food product 1. This is advantageous because the pressing process is irreversible only at low product temperatures in the freezing range. When pressing warmer products, on the other hand, the product deformation largely recedes after pressing, which is undesirable. It therefore makes sense for the control unit 9 to generate an error message if the evaluation of the feedback from the press 5 shows that the food products 1 are too warm for a proper pressing process.


The pressed food product 2 is then conveyed from the press 5 to the scanner 6 by the conveyor 3 in a step S5.


In a step S7, the pressed food product is then scanned in the second scanner 6, determining appropriate analysis parameters, which are then forwarded to the control unit 9.


In a step S8, the pressed food product 2 is then conveyed from the scanner 6 to the cutting unit 7.


In a step S9 the pressed food product 2 is then cut into slices in the slicing device 7.


In the next step SW, the sliced food product 2 is then conveyed to the packaging machine 8 and finally packaged in a final step S11.


The pressing parameters specified by the control unit 9 can also include a pressing travel-time curve of 10 or 10′, as shown in FIG. 3A. In the case of pressing travel-time curve 10, the pressing travel x increases linearly with time until the maximum pressing travel xHUB is finally reached after the specified press duration THUB. The pressing travel x is the compression travel covered by the food product 1 during deformation.


In contrast, the pressing travel-time curve 10′ differs from the pressing travel-time curve 10 by a progressive course, which can lead to an optimization of the pressing process.


The pressing parameters specified by the control unit 9 may also include a pressing force-time curve 11 or 11′, as shown in FIG. 3B.


With the pressing force-time curve 11, the pressing force FPRESS increases linearly with the time t during the THUB press duration.


The pressing force-time curve 11′, on the other hand, has a progressive curve, which can contribute to an optimization of the pressing process.



FIG. 3C finally shows two pressing travel-time curves 12, 12′.


With the pressing travel-time curve 12, the pressing process takes place within a short pressing time THUB1 with a relatively small pressing travel xHUB1. This means that the degree of deformation is relatively low, so that pressing can be carried out relatively quickly without any risk of damage to the food product.


With the pressing travel-time curve 12′, on the other hand, the degree of deformation is much greater, so that it is advantageous to press more slowly, i.e. with a much longer THUB2 press duration.



FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate the pressing of products 1 of different sizes in the press 5 which comprises a pressing chamber 13 with an adjustable degree of opening d1, d2 and movable dies 14, 15 for pressing the product 1.


In FIG. 4A on the one hand, the product 1 to be pressed is relatively large. The size of the product 1 is determined by the scanner 5 and the control unit 9 controls the press 5 so that the pressing chamber 13 opens relatively wide for receiving the large product 1, i.e. the degree of opening d1 is relatively large.


In FIG. 4B on the other hand, the product 1 to be pressed is relatively small. The size of the product 1 is determined by the scanner 5 and the control unit 9 controls the press 5 so that the pressing chamber 13 opens relatively little for receiving the small product 1, i.e. the degree of opening d2 is relatively small.


Therefore, an unnecessary wide opening of the pressing chamber 13 is avoided and the press 5 is nevertheless suitable to receive products 1 of different sizes.


The invention is not limited to the preferred embodiment described above. Rather, the invention comprises various variants and modifications which also make use of the inventive idea and therefore fall within the scope of protection. In particular, the invention also claims protection for the subject-matter and the features of the dependent claims independently of the claims referred to in each case and in particular also without the features of the main claim. The invention thus comprises various invention aspects which enjoy protection independently of each other.


LIST OF REFERENCE SIGNS






    • 1 Food product before pressing


    • 2 Food product after pressing


    • 3 Conveyor


    • 4 Scanner before the press


    • 5 Press


    • 6 Scanner behind the press


    • 7 Slicing device


    • 8 Packaging machine


    • 9 Control unit


    • 10, 10′ Pressing travel-time curve


    • 11, 11′ Pressing force-time curve


    • 12, 12′ Pressing travel-time curve


    • 13 Pressing chamber


    • 14, 15 Dies of the press

    • d1, d2 Degree of opening of the pressing chamber

    • x Pressing travel

    • xHUB Pressing travel

    • THUB pressing time

    • FMAX Maximum pressing force

    • t Pressing time




Claims
  • 1. A food processing apparatus for processing food products comprising: a press configured to press the food products according to predetermined pressing parameters;a first analyzing device configured to analyze the food products before pressing and configured to generate corresponding first analysis parameters of the food products, the first analysis parameters representing product properties of the analyzed food product; anda control unit having an output side connected to the press and which is configured to adjust the pressing parameters of the press, the control unit having an input side connected to the first analyzing device and configured to receive the first analysis parameters and to set the pressing parameters of the press as a function of the first analysis parameters and connected to the press, the control unit is configured to receive feedback from the press in the form of feedback pressing parameters, and the control unit is configured to calculate a product parameter which represents a degree of freezing of the pressed product based upon the feedback pressing parameters.
  • 2. The food processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the control unit is configured to set at least one of the following pressing parameters: a) maximum pressing force in at least one pressing axis,b) pressing travel in at least one pressing axis,c) pressing time,d) pressing force-time curve which represents a course of a pressing force as a function of a pressing time in at least one pressing axis,e) pressing travel-time curve which represents a course of a pressing travel as a function of a pressing time in at least one pressing axis,f) overall behavior model of three pressing axes which are aligned transversely to one another, andg) massaging parameters for massaging the food products during pressing.
  • 3. The food processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the control unit is configured to determine an actual shape of the food products from the first analysis parameters before pressing,the control unit is configured to determine from the determined actual shape of the food products before pressing and a predetermined desired target shape a required degree of deformation which is required in order to press the food product from the actual shape into the target shape,the control unit is configured to set at least one pressing parameter as a function of the required degree of deformation so that the food products with a large degree of deformation are deformed more gently than the food products with a small degree of deformation.
  • 4. The food processing apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a second analyzing device configured to analyze the food products after pressing and configured to generate corresponding second analysis parameters of the food products, the second analysis parameters representing product properties of the pressed food product, andwherein the control unit is connected on its input side to the second analyzing device and is configured to receive the second analysis parameters and is configured to set the pressing parameters as a function of the second analysis parameters.
  • 5. The food processing apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the control unit is configured to use the second analysis parameters to analyze whether the pressed food product has been altered as desired or undesired by a preceding pressing operation, bya) a fragmentation of the food product, orb) a fracture of a bone in the food product, orc) a formation of a brow, ord) a shaping of product shape into corners, ore) shape accuracy according to a form set used in the press, orf) relaxation of the food product after pressing; andthe control unit is configured to adapt the pressing parameters if the pressed food product has been altered in an undesired form by the preceding pressing operation.
  • 6. The food processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first analyzing device comprises a scanner configured to scan the food products and configured to determine at least one of the following product properties: a) length of the food product,b) width of the food product,c) height of the food product,d) volume of the food product,e) shape of the food product,f) fat content of the food product,g) bone content of the food product,h) lean meat content of the food product,i) bone volume of the food product,j) bone form of the food product,k) presence of a brow of the food product.
  • 7. The food processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first analyzing device comprises a temperature measuring device configured to measure a temperature of the food products as a product property.
  • 8. The food processing apparatus according to claim 4, further comprising: a slicing device configured to slice the pressed food products;a packaging device configured to package the food products; anda conveying device configured to convey the food products along a conveying path successively through the first analyzing device, through the press, through the second analyzing device, through the slicing device and into the packaging device.
  • 9. The food processing apparatus according to claim 8, wherein at least one of the slicing device and the packaging device is configured to transmit desired specifications for the food product properties to the control unit, andthe control unit is configured to set the pressing parameters as a function of the desired specifications.
  • 10. The food processing apparatus in accordance with claim 1, wherein the first analyzing device comprises a scanner and the first analysis parameters reflect a size of the incoming food products,the press comprises a pressing chamber in which the food products are pressed, wherein the pressing chamber can be opened with an adjustable degree of opening to receive one of the food products for subsequent pressing of the food product, andthe control unit is configured to control the degree of opening of the pressing chamber according to the size of the food product as determined by the scanner, wherein the pressing chamber opens relatively wide for receiving a large food product, while the pressing chamber opens relatively little for receiving a small food product.
  • 11. The food processing apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the control unit is configured to set at least one of the following pressing parameters: maximum pressing force in three pressing axes which are aligned transversely to a) one another,b) pressing travel in three pressing axes which are aligned transversely to one another,c) pressing time,d) pressing force-time curve which represents a course of a pressing force as a function of a pressing time in three pressing axes which are aligned transversely to one another,e) pressing travel-time curve which represents a course of a pressing travel as a function of a pressing time in three pressing axes which are aligned transversely to one another,f) overall behavior model of three pressing axes which are aligned transversely to one another, andg) massaging parameters for massaging the food products during pressing.
  • 12. The food processing apparatus according in accordance with claim 3, wherein the one pressing parameter is at least one of a pressing duration and a pressing speed.
  • 13. The food processing apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the first analyzing device and/or the second analyzing device comprises a scanner configured to scan the food products and configured to determine at least one of the following product properties: a) length of the food product,b) width of the food product,c) height of the food product,d) volume of the food product,e) shape of the food product,f) fat content of the food product,g) bone content of the food product,h) lean meat content of the food product,i) bone volume of the food product,j) bone form of the food product,k) presence of a brow of the food product.
  • 14. The food processing apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the scanner is an optical scanner or an X-ray scanner.
  • 15. The food processing apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the first analyzing device and/or the second analyzing device comprises a temperature measuring device configured to measure the temperature of the food products as a product property.
  • 16. The food processing apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the scanner is an optical scanner or an X-ray scanner.
  • 17. The food processing apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the desired specifications for the food product properties is a desired target shape of the food products.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
102019110313.4 Apr 2019 DE national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2020/060159 4/9/2020 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2020/212246 10/22/2020 WO A
US Referenced Citations (169)
Number Name Date Kind
2043366 Bech Jun 1932 A
2241807 Cotner May 1941 A
2565245 Lebovitz Aug 1951 A
2880668 Cranke Apr 1959 A
3105433 Yerex et al. Oct 1963 A
3179039 Christensen Apr 1965 A
3211086 Pearce Oct 1965 A
3229621 Decker et al. Jan 1966 A
3285162 Schneider et al. Nov 1966 A
3326120 Schneider et al. Jun 1967 A
3327622 Lebovitz Jun 1967 A
3633245 Partos Jan 1972 A
3667521 Beasley Jun 1972 A
3727545 Madsen et al. Apr 1973 A
3753398 Dohm, Jr. Aug 1973 A
3759170 Bettcher Sep 1973 A
3842260 Christensen et al. Oct 1974 A
3846958 Divan Nov 1974 A
3901140 Dohm, Jr. Aug 1975 A
3982299 Kompan Sep 1976 A
3990336 Soodalter Nov 1976 A
4147485 Zimmerman Apr 1979 A
4273789 Zimmerman Jun 1981 A
4557019 Van Devanter et al. Dec 1985 A
4651384 Korhonen Mar 1987 A
4962568 Rudy et al. Oct 1990 A
4967652 Mally Nov 1990 A
5064667 Mally Nov 1991 A
5117717 Mally Jun 1992 A
5267168 Antonissen et al. Nov 1993 A
5314375 O'Brien et al. May 1994 A
5324228 Vogeley, Jr. Jun 1994 A
5334084 O'Brien et al. Aug 1994 A
5429548 Long et al. Jul 1995 A
5431935 Carey Jul 1995 A
5470274 Kadi et al. Nov 1995 A
5482166 Brown Jun 1996 A
5568766 Otremba et al. Oct 1996 A
5638748 Daniel Jun 1997 A
5668634 Newman Sep 1997 A
5682742 Sato et al. Nov 1997 A
5701811 Kawakami Dec 1997 A
5727997 Dufour et al. Mar 1998 A
5902177 Tessier et al. May 1999 A
5913956 Capps Jun 1999 A
5944598 Tong et al. Aug 1999 A
5979210 Baur et al. Nov 1999 A
6089849 Bulgrin et al. Jul 2000 A
6108587 Shearer et al. Aug 2000 A
6129625 Cate et al. Oct 2000 A
6156358 Soper Dec 2000 A
6186059 Mello et al. Feb 2001 B1
6189059 Sotek et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198834 Belk et al. Mar 2001 B1
6449334 Mazess Sep 2002 B1
6511370 Mello et al. Jan 2003 B1
6530311 Wilkens et al. Mar 2003 B1
6601499 Bifulco Aug 2003 B1
6604991 Jurs et al. Aug 2003 B1
6692345 Kruger Feb 2004 B1
6859282 Weber et al. Feb 2005 B1
6860804 Kruger Mar 2005 B2
6882434 Sandberg et al. Apr 2005 B1
6941783 Yamanaka et al. Sep 2005 B2
7052388 Houtz May 2006 B2
7156730 Blaine Jan 2007 B1
7251537 Blaine et al. Jul 2007 B1
7364504 Gasbarro Apr 2008 B2
7373217 Young May 2008 B2
7399220 Kriesel et al. Jul 2008 B2
7450247 Sandberg et al. Nov 2008 B2
7452266 Bottemiller Nov 2008 B2
7481158 Gerngross et al. Jan 2009 B2
7500550 Strong et al. Mar 2009 B2
7501140 Gould et al. Mar 2009 B2
7578732 Lennox, III Aug 2009 B2
7621806 Bottemiller et al. Nov 2009 B2
7623249 Sandberg et al. Nov 2009 B2
7651388 Faires et al. Jan 2010 B2
7687093 Nielsen Mar 2010 B2
7715935 Vogeley, Jr. et al. May 2010 B2
7747042 Blaine Jun 2010 B2
7841264 Kim et al. Nov 2010 B2
7918718 Christensen et al. Apr 2011 B2
7949414 Blaine et al. May 2011 B2
8016649 Schimitzek Sep 2011 B2
8025000 Kim et al. Sep 2011 B2
8116554 Burton Feb 2012 B2
8166856 Kim et al. May 2012 B2
8373749 Burton Feb 2013 B2
8517806 Fillenworth et al. Aug 2013 B2
8529321 Weber Sep 2013 B2
8643851 Weber Feb 2014 B2
8688267 Blaine et al. Apr 2014 B2
8721405 McKenna et al. May 2014 B2
8758099 Reifenhaeuser Jun 2014 B2
8962055 Groneberg-Nienstedt Feb 2015 B2
8968808 Kunert et al. Mar 2015 B1
8986080 Black et al. Mar 2015 B2
9091673 Fern et al. Jul 2015 B2
9095147 Hjalmarsson et al. Aug 2015 B2
9198442 Peters et al. Dec 2015 B2
9247755 Andre et al. Feb 2016 B1
9285213 Lindee et al. Mar 2016 B2
9351498 Grimm et al. May 2016 B2
9386780 Soncimi Jul 2016 B2
9526257 Farrant et al. Dec 2016 B1
9538768 Dunivan Jan 2017 B2
9700060 Inoue et al. Jul 2017 B2
9770838 Kim et al. Sep 2017 B2
9778651 Strong et al. Oct 2017 B2
9888696 Lindee et al. Feb 2018 B2
9913483 Vuholm et al. Mar 2018 B2
10040213 Nielsen Aug 2018 B2
10863751 Blaine Dec 2020 B2
10869489 Blaine et al. Dec 2020 B2
20010036807 Veldkamp et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020004366 Thorvaldsson et al. Jan 2002 A1
20040029514 Kruger Feb 2004 A1
20040200365 Young Oct 2004 A1
20050032471 Pfarr et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050085176 Houtz Apr 2005 A1
20050199111 Sandberg et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060154587 Mikkelsen et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060156878 Faires et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060162515 Vogeley, Jr. et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060171581 Blaine Aug 2006 A1
20060205335 Bifulco Sep 2006 A1
20070202229 Nielsen Aug 2007 A1
20080196566 Culling Aug 2008 A1
20080200107 Christensen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080212842 Burton Sep 2008 A1
20080281461 Blaine et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090035434 Sverrisson et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090038455 Strong et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090064833 Sandberg et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090137195 Bottemiller et al. May 2009 A1
20090246333 Groneberg-Nienstedt et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100066824 Burton Mar 2010 A1
20100179684 Blaine et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100267320 Weber Oct 2010 A1
20100304652 Bolte et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110111682 Schimitzek May 2011 A1
20110154969 Weber Jun 2011 A1
20120018353 McKenna et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120040597 Fern et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120115406 Fillenworth et al. May 2012 A1
20120212603 Lindee et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130260660 Reifenhaeuser Oct 2013 A1
20140220193 Hocker et al. Aug 2014 A1
20150093488 Gutmann et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150150272 Peters et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150205288 Strong et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150216192 Jacobsen et al. Aug 2015 A1
20160088852 Lindee et al. Mar 2016 A1
20170035066 Hukelmann Feb 2017 A1
20170156354 Inoue et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170210023 Hocker et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170212506 Pfarr et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170217044 Blaine Aug 2017 A1
20170245509 Petersen et al. Aug 2017 A1
20180027848 Blaine et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180029246 Blaine et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180158537 Blaine Jun 2018 A1
20190009421 Grasselli Jan 2019 A1
20190281843 Volkl et al. Sep 2019 A1
20200068908 Blaine Mar 2020 A1
20200068909 Blaine et al. Mar 2020 A1
20210227840 Blaine Jul 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (70)
Number Date Country
200111314 May 2001 AU
2012267912 Dec 2012 AU
2013202066 Oct 2013 AU
2013301673 Feb 2014 AU
2531857 Jun 2006 CA
2550972 Dec 2006 CA
2877448 Oct 2016 CA
2904958 Mar 2017 CA
105979784 Sep 2016 CN
2843388 Jun 1979 DE
8128596 Mar 1982 DE
3100901 Aug 1982 DE
4106689 Oct 1991 DE
68903375 Mar 1993 DE
10220006 Nov 2003 DE
102004010696 Sep 2005 DE
60305523 Aug 2007 DE
102010021951 Dec 2011 DE
102012107278 Feb 2014 DE
10220006 Apr 2015 DE
102019110313 Jul 2020 DE
201570224 Apr 2015 DK
0101264 Feb 1984 EP
0057478 Apr 1986 EP
0373844 Jun 1990 EP
1174034 Jan 2002 EP
1555882 May 2006 EP
1289374 Jul 2007 EP
1782929 Sep 2007 EP
2084968 May 2009 EP
1781110 Feb 2010 EP
2210495 Jul 2010 EP
2341313 Jul 2011 EP
2353391 Aug 2011 EP
2625959 Aug 2013 EP
2531038 Dec 2013 EP
2644337 Mar 2014 EP
2755018 Jul 2014 EP
2308313 Mar 2016 EP
3069835 Sep 2016 EP
3275313 Jan 2018 EP
2882296 Apr 2018 EP
3424332 Jan 2019 EP
2075459 Nov 1981 GB
2364894 Feb 2002 GB
2377362 Jan 2003 GB
2007522948 Aug 2007 JP
5025271 Sep 2012 JP
2017003541 Oct 2017 MX
9003736 Apr 1990 WO
WO1990015005 Dec 1990 WO
2004106020 Dec 2004 WO
2006080033 Aug 2006 WO
2007022782 Mar 2007 WO
2007096363 Aug 2007 WO
WO2008095500 Aug 2008 WO
WO2011095998 Aug 2011 WO
2012161577 Nov 2012 WO
2013135264 Sep 2013 WO
2013148322 Oct 2013 WO
2014023626 Feb 2014 WO
2015092935 Jun 2015 WO
2015114118 Aug 2015 WO
2015193507 Dec 2015 WO
WO2016023557 Feb 2016 WO
2016045683 Mar 2016 WO
WO2016202508 Dec 2016 WO
WO2017066549 Apr 2017 WO
2018111108 Jun 2018 WO
2020212246 Oct 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (33)
Entry
Amendment dated Jan. 24, 2022 filed in EP AppIn No. 20 718 654.3, 45 pages.
Opponent Response to Objection dated Feb. 26, 2024 filed in Opposition of German Patent No. 10 2019 110 313, 93 pages.
Official Action dated Mar. 1, 2024, received in Opposition Proceeding to German Patent No. 10 2019 110 313.4, 110 pages.
Patent holder Response dated Jun. 20, 2024 submitted in response to Official Communication dated Mar. 1, 2024 to German Patent No. 10 2019 110 313, 156 pages.
Machine translation of DE 10220006 A1.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2020/060159 dated Jun. 29, 2020, 15 pages.
English Machine Translation of CN 105979784 A.
English Machine Translation of DE 102004010696 A1.
English Machine Translation of DE 102010021951 A1.
English Machine Translation of DE 102012107278 A1.
English Machine Translation of DE 60305523 T2.
English Machine Translation of EP 2341313 A1.
English Machine Translation of EP 3275313 A1.
English Machine Translation of JP 2007522948 A.
English Machine Translation of JP 5025271 B2.
English Machine Translation of MX 2017003541 A.
English machine translation of the abstract for DK 201570224 A1.
English Machine Translation of EP 2644337 B1.
English Machine Translation of WO 2015092935 A1.
“Hoegger, Operating the Machine.”
“Hoegger, Machine Description, Applies to 174578, 205944, 207841.”
Meyn Food Processing Technology B.V. “Performance software for poultry processing”, revision date Jun. 13, 2018.
Meyn Poultry Processing Solutions, Wall-To-Wall Solutions, © Jan. 2013.
Machine translation for DE2843388A1.
Machine translation for DE3100901A1.
Machine translation for DE8128596U1.
Winopal et al., “Instrumentelle Sensorik in der Ernahrungswirtschaft”, Teil 2: Mechanische Texturanalyse bei Lebensmitteln, DLG-Expertenwissen, dated Mar. 2015, 8 pages.
Auszugskopie aus “Lexikon der Physik” (1 Blatt), https://www.spektrum.de/lexikon/physik/scanner-optischer/12758, Copyright 1998, 2 pages.
Official Action dated May 10, 2021, received in Opposition Proceeding to German Patent Application No. 10 2019 110 313.4, 1,390 pages.
Opponent Response to Objection dated Oct. 17, 2023 submitted in Response to Objection in Opposition of German Patent No. 10 2019 110 313, 93 pages.
Official Action dated May 31, 2023 received in Opposition Proceeding to German Patent Application No. 10 2019 110 313.4, 26 pages.
Patent holder Response to Objection dated Oct. 2, 2023 submitted in Response to Objection dated May 31, 2023 to German Patent No. 10 2019 110 313, 146 pages.
Patent holder Response to Objection dated Jul. 29, 2021 submitted in Response to Objection dated May 10, 2021 to German Patent No. 10 2019 110 313, 34 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220346390 A1 Nov 2022 US