The invention generally relates to automatic food process lines and, more particularly, to a food product loader for the food process lines that dispenses a unit of a food product on the process line from the bottom of a bulk hopper.
The subject matter herein provides improvements to the efforts disclosed by commonly-invented, commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 8,678,886—Robert G. Nothum, Jr., entitled “FOOD PRODUCT LOADER FOR FOOD PROCESS LINES.” The foregoing document is incorporated herein by this reference thereto.
The following distinction in a pair of terms, which might at first encounter be confusingly similar, will be continued here. The term ‘line’ refers to a line of food process machines and the term ‘lane’ refers to single file aisle of food product pieces on, for example, a conveyor of the food process line. Hence the subject matter herein deals with in part, plural lanes of food product pieces on a food process line.
The above-identified patent recognized various issues at that time, or at least two. First was speed, or the lack thereof. It was disclosed then that the massaging frames were driven in rates of rotation that were slow, perhaps a little faster than a rotisserie for a barbeque grill, but not by much. So hence for any food process line, there is a bottleneck problem. The speed of the whole food process line is determined by the slowest piece of machinery. If most of the machines can run at 5,000 lbs/hr throughput of food product, perhaps even 10,000 lbs/hr, the food process line as a whole can only run 3,000 lbs/hr if that is the speed of the slowest machine.
Second issue concerns not a whole “line” issue but instead a “lane” issue. The individual dispensers for each lane were recognized to clog with bunched pieces of food product that the above-identified patent disclosed sensors to detect if any single lane was empty of food product pieces. Because if it was, the odds were that the problem was due to clogging in that dispenser, and hence there were automatically-driven plungers which were deployed to un-block and clear the clogged dispenser.
And so on, it being an object of the present invention to provide various improvements to a food product loader for food process lines.
As before, the representative food product pieces are boneless, skinless meat pieces in strip form. As mentioned in the above-identified patent, any reference to a chicken “tender” can mean a number of things. The term “tender” can refer specifically to the true anatomical “tenderloin” of a chicken. Or it can refer to imitations, namely, strips of breast meat (other than the tenderloin) cut to size and shape to simulate the true tenderloin. Regardless, both are boneless and skinless strips of chicken meat that have a shape, limpness and squishiness which makes them hard to handle by certain machines.
The challenges to loading tenders from a bulk hopper result from several factors. For one, chicken tenders have a distinct shape (or form). They are long and thin, hence the other common name for them is “fingers.” But they do have something like an elongated tear-drop shape. In the industry, the rounder of the two ends is referred to as the head as the tapered end is referred to as the tail (albeit, these names have nothing to do with the real head and tail of the live bird).
Another factor is the limpness or squishiness of the raw tenders. They have no bones nor any skin, and hence no tissue which gives the tenders any internal rigidity. Any attempts to stand a tender on its head or tail merely results in a collapsed over pile. In a bulk hopper, the tenders just sort of intertwine with one another in a mass like cooked macaroni.
A further factor relates to the slipperiness of raw tenders. True tenders have a smooth side and slightly rougher side. It may be due to these two different textures that, while overall a tender feels slippery like a banana peel, a mass of tenders will kind of adhere to one another.
Given the foregoing, to date there has been no highly satisfactory mechanized way to transfer tenders from a bulk hopper to a wide conveyor belt in a neat orderly fashion. Especially where it is desired to load the tenders in a distributed fashion such that individual tenders are all slightly spaced apart from one another, and smooth side is up.
Standard practice has been to have the tenders manually loaded. This requires room for a team of about a dozen people to stand aside the conveyor, six on each side. The tenders only travel down the line for as long as the team works. In other words, the chicken tenders take breaks along with the team of workers when they take their worker breaks.
It is an object of this invention to provide various improvements in the matters of (and without limitations) some of the following:—
A number of additional features and objects will be apparent in connection with the following discussion of the preferred embodiments and examples with reference to the drawings.
There are shown in the drawings certain exemplary embodiments of the invention as presently preferred. It should be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed as examples, and is capable of variation within the scope of the skills of a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains. In the drawings,
The elongate strip-form food product pieces 50 have been itemized (individualized, or placed in spaced distribution) by the food product loader 100 to be received by the transfer conveyor 102 (and downline equipment downline from the transfer conveyor 102, but none shown here) in laterally-spaced lanes 104, longitudinally spaced apart from one another, and aligned in a longitudinal orientation.
In this description, illustrated elongate strip-form food product pieces 50 are indicated by reference numeral 50. Any open arrow used to symbolically represent itemized or individual elongate strip-form food product pieces 50 is indicated by reference numeral 51. In contrast, illustrated bulk flow of the elongate strip-form food product pieces 50 (or bulk quantities rather than individual pieces) is indicated by reference numeral 52. Any open arrow used to symbolically represent any bulk flow or quantity of the elongate strip-form food product pieces 50 is indicated by reference numeral 53.
Hence in
The food product loader 100 has an assemblage of components 114 comprising what is termed here for convenience as itemizing “componentry,” which includes an infeed hopper 122.
The food product loader 100 has three endless belt conveyors 124, 126 and 128 in series, one being an infeed conveyor 124 to the itemizing componentry and the other two being outflow conveyors 126 and 128, namely:—
In any event, it is an aspect of the food product loader 100 in accordance with the invention to provide an onboard vacuum pump 140, as it is believed that the vacuum pump 140 represents the greatest capital cost in such vacuum systems, the conduits and separation chambers being far less costly.
It is an aspect of the present invention that the value of the constant spraying of solution (moisture) onto the food product 50,51 pieces improves the itemizing operations of the itemizing componentry 114. The solution serves as a lubricant, albeit the solution is largely water-based. So in use, solution is generously sprayed in two especially strategic locations. It is also advantageous to season the solution in part. Hence the generous spraying of solution also serves a second function as marinading the food product pieces 50 at the same time.
The three aforementioned endless belt conveyors 124, 126 and 128 for the food product loader 100 preferably comprise without limitation wire mesh belts. These wire mesh belts readily allow water/solution to pour through. Hence the interior of the cabinet 136 for the food product loader 100 is configured in the upper half as a water vessel, with a V-shaped vessel bottom wall 144 draining into a laterally-extending return gutter 146. The return gutter 146 provides a renewed supply of solution to a recirculation pump 148. The recirculation pump 148 pumps up solution by return conduits to at least a first and second laterally extending spray arm 152 and 154.
With general reference to
The bulk flow 55 then pours over the discharge end of the infeed hopper 122's floor infeed conveyor 124 in a laterally-thinned sheet 55 into an open-topped hard-walled trough 168.
The trough 168's common overhead headspace 172 transitions into a laterally-spaced series of gently rounded crests 182, the downslopes 184 of which fall into one or the other of the eight laterally-spaced hard-walled chutes 174. The crests 182 are not only laterally-rounded with downslopes plummeting into one or the other of the laterally-spaced hardwalled chutes 174, the crests 182 are also longitudinally inclined from the upline to downline direction. That way, that no individual piece 50 of food product finds a stable perch for very long on any crest 182. That is, each individual food product piece 50 will likely be urged by another piece landing on top of it to fall immediately into one chute 174 or the other, or else slide down the spine 188 of the crest 182 to the upline end 212 until that food product piece 50 ultimately loses the battle against keeping its balance. Ultimately, every food product piece 50 is expected to find its way downward into a chute 174. On average (ie., weight or mass average), the bulk flow 55 will be laterally divided into about equal eighths into one each of the eight chutes 174. The chutes 174 taper inwardly downwardly in the longitudinal direction to terminate in eight laterally spaced outlet ports 214 aligned in a common elevation.
As
The trough 168 discharges streams of food product pieces 50 out of each of its plurality (eg., eight) chutes 174 into a funnel assembly 224 that is provided with a like number (eg., eight) of soft-side funnels 176. These soft-sided funnels 176 can be likened to icing-dispensing funnels for cake decorators.
The funnels 176 have a common header 218 which is a planar panel (or panel-form) that slides into a use position and out for removal from one side of the food product loader 100. The common header 218 can be made of stainless steel sheet with the soft-sided funnels 176 adhered thereto. It is preferred to make the header 218 and soft-side funnels 176 as a monolithic whole of polymeric material. It is also intended that the funnel assembly 224 is largely a use-once and discard component. That is, with each washing/cleaning cycle, the hardwalled trough 168 will be sanitized re-deployed while in contrast the funnel assembly 224 will be discarded and replaced with a fresh new one.
As individual pieces 50 of elongate food product migrate down the tapering chutes 174 and then the soft-sided funnels 176, the pieces 50 begin to naturally distance from each other and nearly form a single-file downstream of pieces 50.
There are a pair of laterally-extending, longitudinally-spaced massaging frame assemblies 232 and 234 flanking the row of the plurality of soft-sided funnels 176 on an upline side and downline side respectively.
It is a further aspect of the present invention that the massaging frame assemblies 232 and 234 are partitioned into a plurality of laterally-spaced sections 236 and 238. Preferably each of the upline massaging frame assembly 232 and downline massaging frame assembly 234 provides an upline and downline counterpart section 236 and 238, respectively, for each lane 104. The sections 236 and 238 are partitioned by stationary (preferably stationary) lane dividers 242.
Each massaging frame assembly 232 and 234 comprises a rotating shaft 244 and 246. The upline shaft 244 rotates counterclockwise in the figures, and the downline shaft 246 clockwise in the figures. Each shaft 244 and 246 carries a multiplicity of elongate spokes 248. The spokes 248 extend from bases 252 anchored each spoke 248's respective shaft 244 or 246. The spokes 252 terminate in terminal ends 254 which support laterally elongate cross-bars, or paddles 256.
The upline and downline massaging frame assemblies 232 and 234 counter-rotate into each other as shown. A given upline massaging frame section 236 in a given lane 104 and the counterpart downline massaging frame section 238 in the given lane 104 provide a downward massaging stroke on the respective soft-side funnel 176 in the same given lane 104. The massaging stroke serves not only as an urging force to urge one single elongate food piece 50 down at a time below a plane containing both drive shafts 244 and 246, but also serves a check valve function to hold back the next successive single piece 50 of elongate food product.
So again, improvements have been made and/or learned with respect to massaging frame assemblies 232 and 234 configuration and rotation timing.
The massaging frame assemblies 232 and 234 here, for example and without limitation, present rotating paddles 256 angularly spaced every 120° apart. In other words, each section 236 and 238 of the massaging frame assemblies 232 and 234 present three equally angularly-spaced apart paddles 256 for every rotation. Configurations can be varied with less than three paddles 256 or more than three paddles 256 for each revolution, but three are shown here for example and without limitation.
In the previous patent, each paddle was an elongate monolithic unit extending laterally across all the lanes 104. Here, an improvement in accordance with the invention resides in part in that such monolithic paddles are sub-divided here into sections 236 and 238 according to one section 236 or 238 for each lane 104.
Each massaging frame assembly 232 and 234 comprises a central drive shaft 244 and 246 and then also paddles 256 per section 236 or 238 numbering “X” paddles 256 per revolution (eg., three here) times number of lanes 104 (eg., “N,” or eight here). Therefore, in the non-limiting exemplary configuration here, there are twenty-four paddles 256 per massaging frame assembly 232 or 234. Each massaging frame assembly 232 and 234 further comprises not only the central drive shaft 244 or 246 but then also a pair of spokes 248 for each paddle section 236 or 238. Wherein, given the twenty-four paddles 256 here per massaging frame assembly 232 or 234, that makes forty-eight spokes 248 per massaging frame assembly 232 or 234.
Whereas in the earlier patent, each paddle for a massaging frame assembly might be a monolithic unit about as long as the drive shaft, the counterpart paddle presentation is sub-divided laterally into “N” sections, wherein “N” corresponds to number of lanes 104, hence eight laterally-divided sections 236 or 238. With “X” (or three) paddles 256 in each of the “N” (or eight) lanes 104, then in other words there are three paddles 256 in each section 236 or 238 of a massaging frame assembly 232 or 234. The “X” paddles 256 are angularly uniformly spaced apart from one another (here, 120° apart).
Each collimating channel 260 comprises a left-side sidewall (or leaf) 264 and right-side sidewall (or leaf) 266. These sidewalls 264 and 266 can be alternatively referred to as leafs 264 and 266 because they are adjustable and can be swung left to right in shallow angles:—in pairs like the leafs of a hinge.
So in
In
Staying in
Nevertheless, for each such pairs of leafs 266 and 264 in adjacent lanes 104, these leafs 266 and 264 swing with respect to each other like the leafs of a hinge. The non-limiting disclosure here has each leaf 266 and 264 independently mounted to its own hinge 276, and it is hinged to the downline (front) margin of the lane dividers 242 for the sections of the massage frame assemblies.
In this fashion, the collimating channels 260 can be focused to make a relatively narrow choke point (bottleneck) for the pieces 50 of elongate food product headed downstream.
Pause can be taken to return to the subject matter of the solution recirculation system 142.
Evidently, there is no upper limit of how much spraying is too much. The lubrication works wonders to prevent clogging and promote uniform alignment. The solution is recirculated in the food product loader 100 in any event and so excess is not being sent downline to equipment further downstream.
As
It is an aspect of the invention to isolate cross bars 256 into sections 236 and 238 into individual lanes 104 so that the relative foreshortening of what occurs in lane “1” does not carryover into lane “2” or any of the other lanes 104. So each section 236 and 238 of mutually displacing cross bars 256 operates independently in its own lane 104, with no information coming over from any other lane 104. Whereas the lane dividers 242 serve several purposes, one purpose is to further isolate each upline and downline counterparts of sections 236 and 238 of the massaging frame assemblies 232 and 234 operatively isolated within their own respective lanes 104 only.
Note also that the timing of the timing of the upline massaging frame assembly 232 might be 1° or so (one degree) behind the downline massaging frame assembly 234. In other words, they are not perfectly in unison, although very nearly so.
Indeed, the underpassing food-product carrying upper run 258 of the upline outflow conveyor 126 assists in pulling the elongate food product piece 50 free of the bottom port 262 of the soft-sided funnel 176, and in the preferred longitudinal alignment, by frictional engagement.
The downline outflow conveyor 128 extends between an upline drive end 312 driven by a drum motor 314 and a downline nose end 316. The downline outflow conveyor 128 is essentially cantilevered from the drum motor 314. The downline nose end 316 is relatively free to pivot up and down relative the position shown in, for example,
It is preferable to use a drum motor 314 in contrast to a standard motor configuration. Standard motors have their skin mounted stationary and their central axle is a rotor which rotates. With drum motors 314, the central axle is held stationary and the skin (the cylindrical casing) rotates. It is preferred to use electric-powered drum motors 314. To return to
These load cells 322, 324, 326 and 328 suspend the cantilevered downline outflow conveyor 128 for reasons including in part just to hold it, unloaded and stopped (not running) in the position as shown in
When the cantilevered downline outflow conveyor 128 is unloaded and stopped (not running), the load cells 322, 324, 326 and 328 will provide a signal corresponding to some force (eg., weight).
When the cantilevered downline outflow conveyor 128 is still unloaded but now running, the load cells 322, 324, 326 and 328 will provide a signal corresponding to a greater force. The differential between the two forces is the force required to oppose the centripetal force of the running drum motor 314.
All the foregoing signals are calibrated (or otherwise accounted for) to correspond to a tare weight. Now the load cells 322, 324, 326 and 328 are prepared for providing signals that can be corresponded to flow rate measurements.
Note however that all four gauges are reporting different values. The distant-left gauge is reporting the least value, the near-left gauge the second-least value, the distant-right gauge the third-least value, and the near right value the greatest value.
In use, it has been discovered that this set-up of load cells 322, 324, 326 and 328 can detect when a fresh row 58 of “N” lanes 104 of food product pieces 50 is deposited on the upline infeed end 312 of the downline outflow conveyor 128, and correspondingly when the lead row 58 of “N” lanes 104 traverses past (drops off) the downline nose end 316 of the downline outflow conveyor 128. Whereas it is assumed all “N” lanes 104 in all rows 58 are filled, that is not always true. Nevertheless, this set-up of load cells 322, 324, 326 and 328 is so sensitive that such missing occupancy can be detected and the transit of that hole in the array can be observed by a computational device 330. As an aside, the computational device 330 can provide indications of this to human observers according to programming.
Given the foregoing, an average weight (or mass) flow rate can be reckoned, and rate can be adjusted up or down accordingly as desired (within limits).
As an aside, the bulk hopper 122's floor infeed conveyor 124 travels much more slowly than the outflow conveyors a 126 and 128. This is because the weight (mass) of bulk food product 52,53 per unit length of infeed conveyor 124 is so much greater than the spaced distribution of pieces 50 on the outflow conveyors 126 and 128, that the outflow conveyors 126 and 128 have to travel at a relatively brisk speed to keep up.
The invention having been disclosed in connection with the foregoing variations and examples, additional variations will now be apparent to persons skilled in the art. The invention is not intended to be limited to the variations specifically mentioned, and accordingly reference should be made to the appended claims rather than the foregoing discussion of preferred examples, to assess the scope of the invention in which exclusive rights are claimed.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/658,460, filed Oct. 21, 2019, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/749,316, filed Oct. 23, 2018. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/940,003, filed Mar. 29, 2018; which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/478,822, filed Mar. 30, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/545,634, filed Aug. 15, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/560,392, filed Sep. 19, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/577,375, filed Oct. 26, 2017; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/648,613, filed Mar. 27, 2018. The foregoing patent disclosure(s) is(are) incorporated herein by this reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3340790 | Simjian | Sep 1967 | A |
3465383 | Willis et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3562856 | Eriksen | Feb 1971 | A |
3689958 | Dillon | Sep 1972 | A |
4078517 | Castellano et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4132156 | Glaze, Jr. | Jan 1979 | A |
4264634 | Hochandel | Apr 1981 | A |
4281757 | Morton | Aug 1981 | A |
4538510 | Latimer | Sep 1985 | A |
4604704 | Eaves | Aug 1986 | A |
4852475 | Yang | Aug 1989 | A |
4966072 | Ellis-Brown | Oct 1990 | A |
5060562 | Florindez | Oct 1991 | A |
5129353 | Koppens | Jul 1992 | A |
5172636 | Theurer | Dec 1992 | A |
5330383 | Ryan | Jul 1994 | A |
5546848 | Naramura | Aug 1996 | A |
5635235 | Sanchez et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5741536 | Mauer | Apr 1998 | A |
5846046 | Warburton | Dec 1998 | A |
5847273 | Zubragel | Dec 1998 | A |
5881639 | Nesheim | Mar 1999 | A |
6006657 | Ikuta | Dec 1999 | A |
6495182 | Stuck | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6902089 | Carnevali | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7174846 | Zeegers | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7252584 | Kragh | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7637805 | Bueide | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7662034 | Van Hillo et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7886657 | Nothum, Jr. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7954446 | Nakane | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8517806 | Fillenworth et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8651015 | Zhu | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8678886 | Nothum, Jr. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8816223 | Taylor | Aug 2014 | B2 |
10471619 | Hocker | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10834947 | Rognini | Nov 2020 | B2 |
11019829 | Pfannenstiel | Jun 2021 | B2 |
20020015635 | Sinn | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030008605 | Hartford | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030079678 | Zeegers | May 2003 | A1 |
20040123566 | Limousin | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060292271 | King | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20090223411 | Higgins | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090294246 | Pogue | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110311685 | Hogan et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120070553 | Hockett et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20150053097 | Vardakostas | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150239591 | Bialy | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160088859 | Ream | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160167888 | Messina | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20180186576 | Torrenga | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20200205461 | Cohen | Jul 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10 2004 062 137 | Feb 2006 | DE |
20 2009 016 645 | May 2011 | DE |
1 127 496 | Feb 2000 | EP |
2 481 295 | Aug 2012 | EP |
Entry |
---|
PCT/US2017/033355, John Shell, Nov. 23, 2017. |
NL Search Report, Appln. No. NL 2020691 dated Jan. 15, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210100258 A1 | Apr 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62749316 | Oct 2018 | US | |
62478822 | Mar 2017 | US | |
62545634 | Aug 2017 | US | |
62560392 | Sep 2017 | US | |
62577375 | Oct 2017 | US | |
62648613 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16658460 | Oct 2019 | US |
Child | 17021587 | US | |
Parent | 15940003 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16658460 | US |