Patent Application
20230263194
The present disclosure relates to a food processing apparatus.
Conventionally, photocatalysts have been known to be used for processing food.
For example, JP 2003-250514 describes a method for producing a brewed product using a photocatalyst. In this production method, when sterilizing the brewed product, a photocatalyst supported on the surface of a specific member such as an agitating member is irradiated with excitation light while the brewed product placed in a tank is being agitated by the agitating member at room temperature. As shown in
The present disclosure provides a food processing apparatus that is advantageous in terms of increasing a reaction rate while suppressing alteration of food when processing the food using light.
A food processing apparatus of the present disclosure includes:
a container having a space for containing food;
a catalyst film having an active surface in contact with the space; and
a light source disposed at a position closer to a main surface of the catalyst film located on a side opposite to the active surface than to the active surface in a thickness direction of the catalyst film, and configured to emit ultraviolet light toward the catalyst film, wherein
an absorptivity of the catalyst film for the ultraviolet light is 50% or more.
The food processing apparatus of the present disclosure is advantageous in terms of increasing a reaction rate while suppressing alteration of food.
(Findings on which the Present Disclosure is Based)
When processing food using a photocatalyst, it is conceivable to irradiate the photocatalyst, which is disposed inside a container in which the food is contained, with excitation light from the outside of the container. For example, in the microorganism sterilization apparatus 300 described in Patent Literature 1, the anatase type titanium oxide film formed on the surface of each agitating blade 309 is irradiated with the light from the light source 310 which is located outside the tank 301.
Meanwhile, according to the study by the present inventors, the present inventors have found that if excitation light including ultraviolet light passes through food contained in a container before being incident on a photocatalyst, the ultraviolet light may cause alteration or deterioration of components contained in the food, which should not occur. Therefore, the present inventors have studied intensively, and as a result, the present inventors have newly found that causing ultraviolet light emitted from a light source to be incident on a catalyst film from a main surface of the catalyst film on the side opposite to an active surface of the catalyst film is advantageous in terms of preventing alteration or deterioration of components contained in food. The present inventors have further studied and newly found that the reaction rate of a reaction for processing food can be increased when a catalyst film satisfies a predetermined condition. Based on such new findings, the present inventors have completed the food processing apparatus of the present disclosure.
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present disclosure will be described with reference to the drawings. The embodiments described below are all comprehensive or specific examples. The numerical values, shapes, materials, components, arrangement positions of the components, connection forms, process conditions, steps, order of the steps, etc., shown in the following embodiments are examples, and are not intended to limit the present disclosure. In addition, among the components in the following embodiments, the components that are not described in the independent claims that represent broadest concepts are described as discretionary components. Each drawing is a schematic diagram, and is not necessarily exactly illustrated.
Most of the amount of the ultraviolet light U incident on the main surface 22a of the catalyst film 20 is absorbed in the catalyst film 20. By the absorption of the ultraviolet light U in the catalyst film 20, a large number of excitons are generated in the catalyst film 20. For example, excitons are generated as electron-hole pairs over a wide range of the catalyst film 20 by the interaction between the catalyst film 20 and the ultraviolet light U. The excitons have a finite lifetime of several nanoseconds to several tens of nanoseconds and diffuse through the catalyst film 20 during the lifetime thereof. For example, the concentration of the excitons in the catalyst film 20 decreases exponentially from the main surface 22a toward the active surface 21a. Many of the excitons reach the interface between the active surface 21a and the food F by diffusion due to such a concentration gradient. The excitons that have reached the interface cause charge transfer reactions between oxygen molecules, water molecules, and reaction substrates contained in the food F and the catalyst film 20 to produce active species. As a result, photochemical reactions required for processing the food F proceed selectively. The excitons generated by the interaction between the catalyst film 20 and the ultraviolet light U may be charge-separated and behave as carriers such as electrons and holes.
Food including food materials are sensitive to ultraviolet light irradiation. When food is irradiated with ultraviolet light, the food may be altered or deteriorated, and odor such as rotten odor, malodor, and artificial odor, which are different from the original flavor of the food, may be perceived. Flavor, taste, and texture are the three major elements of food. Among them, flavor is an important element. Therefore, the generation of such odor can greatly reduce the value of the food. Meanwhile, in the food processing apparatus 1a, since most of the amount of the ultraviolet light U is absorbed in the catalyst film 20 before the ultraviolet light U reaches the food F, the food F is less likely to be irradiated with ultraviolet light having high intensity. The absorptivity of the catalyst film 20 for the ultraviolet light U can be changed according to the wavelength of the ultraviolet light U emitted from the light source 30. Therefore, various types of light sources can be used as the light source 30. As described above, the food processing apparatus 1a can prevent alteration or deterioration of food due to ultraviolet light, and can mainly promote target reactions for food processing.
Among various chemical reactions involving organic substances contained in food, there are photochemical reactions in which light plays an important role. Photocatalytic reactions, which occur as a result of the interaction of light with solid catalysts, etc., are also photochemical reactions. In order to distinguish photocatalytic reactions that occur as a result of the interaction of light with solid catalysts, and photochemical reactions that occur as a result of the direct interaction of light with organic molecules, here, the latter is referred to as “organic photochemical reactions”.
For organic photochemical reactions to occur, light absorption by molecules that are to react is required. Light absorption is caused by functional groups or molecular skeletons that form the molecules. Among various organic molecules, those having light absorption in the wavelength range of 250 nm to 450 nm are benzenes, pyridines, thiophenes, furans, and compounds having carbon-oxygen double bonds such as a carbonyl group. These compounds can be included in the aromatic compounds that interact with the human sense of smell. Since food is a mixture of a wide variety of macromolecules and low molecular weight molecules, it is extremely difficult to trace the individual organic photochemical reactions of the above compounds at the molecular level. On the other hand, when food in which organic photochemical reactions have occurred is examined by sensory evaluation using the human sense of smell, it can be checked whether or not odor, which is different from the original aroma of the food, has been generated.
The processing of the food F performed using the food processing apparatus 1a is not limited to any specific processing. The processing may be for sterilization of the food F, or may be for changing a component contained in the food F to another component. The food processing apparatus 1a may be used for brewing, or may be used for food production and food processing other than brewing.
For example, the thickness of the catalyst film 20 is adjusted such that the absorptivity of the catalyst film 20 for the ultraviolet light U is 50% or more. The thickness of the catalyst film 20 can be determined, for example, based on an interference pattern appearing in a transmission spectrum of the catalyst film 20.
The absorptivity of the catalyst film 20 for the ultraviolet light U can be determined, for example, by the following method. An emission spectrum at the light source 30 is obtained, and a wavelength range Δλ corresponding to the full width at half maximum for the maximum light intensity is specified in the emission spectrum. An absorption spectrum of the catalyst film 20 is measured using a spectrophotometer. An integral value II of the light intensity of the emission spectrum in the wavelength range Δλ is obtained. An integral value IA of the light intensity absorbed by the catalyst film 20 in this wavelength range is obtained based on the absorption spectrum of the catalyst film 20. An absorptivity A is determined from Expression (1) based on the integral value II and the integral value IA.
A[%]=100×IA/II Expression (1)
The absorptivity of the catalyst film 20 for the ultraviolet light U may be 55% or more, may be 60% or more, or may be 70% or more. The absorptivity of the catalyst film for the ultraviolet light U may be 100%, may be 98% or less, or may be 95% or less.
Regarding light absorption in a material, Lambert's law, shown in Expression (2) below, is known. In Expression (2), I0 denotes incident light intensity when light propagates through the material, I denotes transmitted light intensity, α denotes an absorption coefficient, and d denotes the thickness of the material. The absorption coefficient α is related to the response characteristics of the material to ultraviolet light, and is a function of wavelength. In the catalyst film 20, the shorter the wavelength of light is, the greater the value of the absorption coefficient α is likely to be.
Log(I0/I)=αd Expression (2)
If the interaction between ultraviolet light and a catalyst film is strong and the absorption coefficient α of the material that forms the catalyst film is high, the light intensity of the ultraviolet light incident on the catalyst film significantly decreases when the ultraviolet light propagates through a part of the catalyst film. Therefore, it is difficult for the ultraviolet light to propagate to a main surface of the catalyst film on the side opposite to the incident surface of the catalyst film on which the ultraviolet light has been incident. On the other hand, if the interaction between ultraviolet light and a catalyst film is weak and the absorption coefficient α of the material that forms the catalyst film is low, the ultraviolet light incident on the catalyst film propagates to a main surface of the catalyst film on the side opposite to the incident surface of the catalyst film on which the ultraviolet light has been incident. The light intensity of the ultraviolet light does not decrease much, and the ultraviolet light leaks out of the catalyst film. The catalyst film 20 preferably has an absorption coefficient α [cm−1] in a predetermined range for a wavelength A of the ultraviolet light U. The absorption coefficient α for the wavelength λ of the ultraviolet light U is, for example, 1971.8 cm−1 when the wavelength λ is 365 nm, is 7347.3 cm−1 when the wavelength λ is 350 nm, and is 18039.7 cm−1 when the wavelength λ is 330 nm. In other words, the absorption coefficient α is, for example, 1971.8 cm−1 to 18039.7 cm−1. Accordingly, the decrease in the light intensity of the ultraviolet light U in the catalyst film 20 is easily adjusted to a desired degree.
The wavelength of the ultraviolet light U emitted from the light source 30 is not limited to any specific value, and is, for example, 320 nm to 375 nm. Accordingly, the ultraviolet light U is appropriately absorbed in the catalyst film 20.
The light source 30 is not limited to any specific light source, and can be, for example, a high-pressure mercury lamp, a low-pressure mercury lamp, a fluorescent lamp type light source containing a fluorescent agent, or a light emitting diode (LED). The light source 30 is preferably a monochromatic light source. In this case, since the wavelength range of the ultraviolet light U is narrow, the thickness of the catalyst film 20 is easily adjusted.
Typically, there are upper and lower limits for the thickness of the catalyst film 20. This is because the emission spectrum of the light source 30 is not expressed as a delta function, but has a finite spectral width, and an ultraviolet light absorption spectrum which is the ultraviolet light response characteristics of the catalyst film 20 is a continuous function.
The thickness of the catalyst film 20 is, for example, equal to or greater than the value of a function F(λ) shown in Expression (3) below in which the wavelength of the ultraviolet light U is a variable, and is equal to or less than the value of a function G(λ) shown in Expression (4) below in which the wavelength of the ultraviolet light U is a variable. In this case, the ultraviolet light U is satisfactorily absorbed in the catalyst film 20 and a large number of excitons are generated and diffuse through the catalyst film 20, so that the reaction rate of the reaction for processing the food F is likely to be increased. In addition, the intensity of transmitted light upon the incidence of the ultraviolet light U on the catalyst film 20 is likely to be decreased, so that the food F can be prevented from being altered or deteriorated. The units of F(λ) and G(λ) are [nm], and the value of λ indicated in [nm] is substituted into F(λ) and G(λ).
F(λ)=45673.65−284.65329λ+0.44409λ2 Expression (3)
G(λ)=149923.62−882.77357λ+1.33037λ2 Expression (4)
The catalyst film 20 may be a film having a plurality of layers, or may be a single-layer film. As shown in
The absorption layer 22 can serve as an absorbing medium for the ultraviolet light U. The number of charge transfer reactions that occur at the interface between the active surface 21a and the food F is never greater than the number of photons absorbed by the catalyst film 20. Therefore, in order to increase the reaction rate of the reaction for processing the food F, it is preferable that the ultraviolet light U incident on the catalyst film is sufficiently absorbed inside the absorption layer 22. For example, the thickness of the absorption layer 22 is adjusted such that the thickness of the catalyst film 20 is equal to or greater than F(λ). The absorption layer 22 can also serve as a conducting medium for excitons. Excitons generated inside the absorption layer 22 can diffuse through the inside of the absorption layer 22 and reach the interface between the active surface 21a and the food F in a finite lifetime T (seconds) of several nanoseconds to several tens of nanoseconds. Excitons that fail to reach this interface become deactivated by recombination between excited electrons and holes. In this case, the light energy used to generate the excitons is converted into heat energy without causing any chemical reaction, and is wasted. Therefore, for example, the thickness of the absorption layer 22 is adjusted such that the thickness of the catalyst film 20 is equal to or less than G(λ).
When the diffusion velocity of excitons in the catalyst film 20 is represented by v [μm/sec], the maximum diffusion distance of the excitons can be approximated as T×V. “T” reflects the excited state dynamics of the excitons and is affected by factors such as the electronic state and defect density of the material. In addition, the crystal phase in the catalyst film 20 can also affect “T”. By adjusting the material of the absorption layer 22 in view of these factors, the reaction rate of the reaction required for processing the food F using the food processing apparatus 1a can be more reliably increased.
The surface layer 21 has the active surface 21a and promotes catalytic reactions. The elementary processes of the catalytic reactions are chemical reactions that occur on solid surfaces. Therefore, the performance as a catalyst is easily determined by a microstructure at the active surface 21a, and not by a structure as a whole. The active surface 21a has, for example, a predetermined microstructure such as surface irregularities. Accordingly, the surface area of the active surface 21a is likely to be increased. As a result, the reaction rate of the reaction required for processing the food F can be more reliably increased by sufficiently increasing the rate of material transport of a component C contained in the food F to the active surface 21a.
Each of the thickness of the surface layer 21 and the thickness of the absorption layer 22 is not limited to any specific value as long as the absorptivity of the catalyst film 20 for the ultraviolet light U is 50% or more. The thickness of the absorption layer 22 is, for example, larger than the thickness of the surface layer 21. Accordingly, the ultraviolet light U can be satisfactorily absorbed in the absorption layer 22. The thickness of the surface layer 21 may be, for example, several nanometers to several tens of nanometers. When the thickness of the surface layer 21 is several nanometers, the surface layer 21 can be formed, for example, as a single layer. When the thickness of the surface layer 21 is several tens of nanometers, the surface layer 21 can be formed, for example, as a plurality of layers. Each of the thickness of the surface layer 21 and the thickness of the absorption layer 22 can be determined, for example, based on an electron microscope image of a cross-section of the catalyst film 20. In this case, each of the thickness of the surface layer 21 and the thickness of the absorption layer 22 can be determined as the arithmetic mean of thicknesses at 10 or more randomly selected locations.
The catalyst film 20 contains, for example, a metal oxide. Accordingly, the ultraviolet light U can be satisfactorily absorbed in the catalyst film 20, so that the reaction rate of the reaction for processing the food F can be more reliably increased.
The metal oxide contained in the catalyst film 20 is not limited to any specific metal oxide, and may be, for example, titanium oxide, zinc oxide, silicon oxide, aluminum oxide, or zeolite. In this specification, oxides containing silicon are included in the “metal oxide”.
The metal oxide contained in the catalyst film 20 may have a composition of TimOn. This composition satisfies conditions of 1≤m≤2 and 2≤n≤3. In this case, the reaction rate of the reaction for processing the food F can be more reliably increased.
In the catalyst film 20, the material that forms the surface layer 21 and the material that forms the absorption layer 22 may be the same type of material, or may be different types of materials. For example, in the catalyst film 20, if the material that forms the surface layer 21 and the material that forms the absorption layer 22 are different materials, it is easy to enhance the function of the absorption layer 22 while enhancing the function of the surface layer 21.
A relative intensity IKA of an anatase phase and a relative intensity IKR of a rutile phase in an XRD pattern of the absorption layer 22 satisfy, for example, conditions of 0.6≤IKA≤1.0 and IKR≤0.2. Meanwhile, the surface layer 21 contains, for example, an anatase phase and substantially contains no rutile phase. Accordingly, the reaction rate of the reaction for processing the food F can be increased more. Substantially containing no rutile phase means that the relative intensity of the rutile phase in an XRD pattern can be regarded as zero. In the absorption layer 22, the maximum diffusion distance of excitons is simply positively correlated with the relative intensity IKA of the anatase phase in the XRD pattern of the absorption layer 22, and is simply negatively correlated with the relative intensity IKR of the rutile phase. Therefore, it is advantageous for the absorption layer 22 to satisfy the conditions of 0.6≤IKA≤1.0 and IKR≤0.2. It is considered that in order to increase the surface area of the active surface 21a, it is advantageous to increase the specific surface area of the surface layer 21. If the surface layer 21 contains an anatase phase and substantially contains no rutile phase, the specific surface area of the surface layer 21 is likely to be increased.
A relative intensity IHA of the anatase phase in an X-ray diffraction pattern of the surface layer 21 may satisfy a condition of 0<IHA≤0.6. Accordingly, the specific surface area of the surface layer 21 is likely to be increased, so that the reaction rate of the reaction for processing the food F is more likely to be increased.
The relative intensity IKA of the anatase phase and the relative intensity IKR of the rutile phase in the XRD pattern of the absorption layer 22 may satisfy conditions of 0<IKA<0.6 and IKR≤0.2. The relative intensity IHA of the anatase phase in the X-ray diffraction pattern of the surface layer 21 may satisfy a condition of 0.6<IHA≤1.0. A relative intensity IHR of the rutile phase in the X-ray diffraction pattern of the surface layer 21 may satisfy a condition of IHR≤0.2.
As shown in
The material of the support 25 is not limited to any specific material, and is, for example, glass. The support 25 typically has low light response characteristics for the ultraviolet light U and a high transmittance for the ultraviolet light U. Examples of the material of the support 25 include quartz glass and borosilicate glass.
The shape of the support 25 is not limited to any specific shape as long as the support 25 can support the catalyst film 20. The support 25 has, for example, a cavity 25h. The light source 30 is disposed, for example, in the cavity 25h. The support 25 has, for example, a tubular shape. The support 25 may have a hollow spherical shape, or may have a hollow polyhedral shape.
As shown in
As shown in
The food processing apparatus of the present disclosure will be described in more detail by means of Examples. The food processing apparatus of the present disclosure is not limited to the following Examples.
A bench top-type food processing apparatus according to Example 1 having the same configuration as the food processing apparatus 1a shown in
A catalyst film was formed on the outer surface of the sleeve by a sol-gel method. While agitating 0.092 mol (21 g) of titanium ethoxide, 14.6 cm3 of hydrochloric acid having a concentration of 20% by mass was gradually added to the titanium ethoxide to obtain a mixed solution. To the obtained mixed solution, a solution obtained by mixing 6 g of a surfactant Pluronic P123 and 74 cm3 of 1-butanol was added, and the mixture was agitated for 3 hours to obtain a sol A. The average molecular weight of Pluronic P123 was 5800. The sol A was applied to the outer surface of the sleeve by spin coating at 3000 revolutions per minute (rpm) for 30 seconds to form a coating film. This coating film was fired in an electric furnace at 500° C. for 2 hours to obtain a catalyst thin film having a thickness of about 400 nm to 500 nm. A step including the formation of the coating film and the firing of the coating film was repeated four times to obtain an absorption layer according to Example 1. The sol A was applied onto the absorption layer according to Example 1 by spin coating at 3000 revolutions per minute (rpm) for 30 seconds to form a coating film. This coating film was fired in an electric furnace at 500° C. for 2 hours to form a surface layer according to Example 1 to obtain a catalyst film according to Example 1 including the absorption layer and the surface layer.
A transmission spectrum of the catalyst film according to Example 1 in a wavelength range of 200 nm to 2500 nm was determined using a UV-visible/NIR spectrophotometer V-770 manufactured by JASCO Corporation. The thickness of the catalyst film according to Example 1 was determined from an interference pattern appearing in the transmission spectrum, using a film thickness calculation program provided by JASCO Corporation. As a result, the thickness of the catalyst film according to Example 1 was 2028.0 nm.
The light absorptivities of the catalyst film according to Example 1 at wavelengths of 365 nm, 350 nm, and 330 nm were determined using the UV-visible/NIR spectrophotometer V-770. As a result, the light absorptivities of the catalyst film according to Example 1 were as shown in Table 1.
In the container of the food processing apparatus according to Example 1, a 10 mass % aqueous yeast solution was put. The temperature of the aqueous yeast solution was adjusted to 5° C. The light source of the food processing apparatus was turned on for 96 hours, and then the light source was turned off. While the light source was turned on, the magnetic agitating element was rotated to agitate the aqueous yeast solution. The lipid peroxide concentrations of liquid samples taken from the aqueous yeast solution immediately before the light source was turned on and the aqueous yeast solution immediately after the light source was turned off were determined by a colorimetric method, using a Lipid Hydroperoxide Assay Kit provided by Funakoshi Co., Ltd. As a result, it was confirmed that the concentration of lipid peroxide, which is a reaction product, was increased immediately after the light source was turned off, compared to that immediately before the light source was turned on.
In the container of the food processing apparatus according to Example 1, a formic acid aqueous solution having a concentration of 10 mg/liter was put as a model food material aqueous solution. The temperature of the formic acid aqueous solution was adjusted to room temperature. The light source was turned on, and after a predetermined time elapsed, the light source was turned off, and a part of the formic acid aqueous solution was taken as a liquid sample. The concentration of formic acid in the liquid sample was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A reaction rate constant k of a photocatalytic reaction was determined using data regarding a reaction rate obtained from the measurement results and a linear rate equation. As a result, the constant k was 6.4 [h−1]. As used herein, the “h” means “hour”. The amount of formic acid that reacted was 3.7 mg/liter.
A food processing apparatus according to Example 2 was produced in the same manner as Example 1, except for the following points. 0.025 mol (2.52 g) of acetylacetone and 0.05 mol (17.50 g) of titanium butoxide were mixed with 32 cm3 of 1-butanol in this order, and the mixture was agitated for 1 hour at room temperature to obtain a mixed solution. A liquid obtained by mixing 0.15 mol (9.05 g) of isopropanol and 3.64 cm3 of water was mixed with this mixed solution, and the mixture was further agitated for 1 hour to obtain a mixed solution. To this mixed solution, 0.04 mol (1.66 g) of acetonitrile was added, and the mixture was agitated for 1 hour to obtain a sol B. The sol B was applied to the surface of an absorption layer by spin coating at 6000 rpm for 30 seconds, and was fired in an electric furnace at 600° C. for 2 hours to form a surface layer according to Example 2 to obtain a catalyst film according to Example 2 including the absorption layer and the surface layer. The thickness of the catalyst film according to Example 2 was measured in the same manner as that of the catalyst film according to Example 1. As a result, the thickness of the catalyst film according to Example 2 was 2156.0 nm. The light absorptivities of the catalyst film according to Example 2 at wavelengths of 365 nm, 350 nm, and 330 nm were determined using the UV-visible/NIR spectrophotometer V-770. As a result, the light absorptivities of the catalyst film according to Example 2 were as shown in Table 2. The light absorptivities of the catalyst film according to Example 2 at these wavelengths were 50% or more.
A reaction rate constant k of a photocatalytic reaction was determined, using a formic acid aqueous solution having a concentration of 10 mg/liter, in the same manner as Example 1, except that the food processing apparatus according to Example 2 was used instead of the food processing apparatus according to Example 1. As a result, the constant k was 9.6 [h−1].
A food processing apparatus according to Comparative Example 1 was produced in the same manner as Example 1, except for the following points. A catalyst film according to Comparative Example 1 was formed in the same manner as Example 1, except that a layer corresponding to the absorption layer according to Example 1 was not formed in the formation of the catalyst film. The thickness of the catalyst film according to Comparative Example 1 was measured by the same method as that for the catalyst film according to Example 1, and was 79.7 nm. The light absorptivities of the catalyst film according to Comparative Example 1 at wavelengths of 365 nm, 350 nm, and 330 nm were determined using the UV-visible/NIR spectrophotometer V-770. As a result, the light absorptivities of the catalyst film according to Comparative Example 1 were as shown in Table 3. The light absorptivities of the catalyst film according to Comparative Example 1 at these wavelengths were less than 50%.
A reaction rate constant k of a photocatalytic reaction was determined, using a formic acid aqueous solution having a concentration of 10 mg/liter, in the same manner as Example 1, except that the food processing apparatus according to Comparative Example 1 was used instead of the food processing apparatus according to Example 1. As a result, the constant k was 1.1 [h−1]. The amount of formic acid that reacted was 0.3 mg/liter.
As shown in Table 4, the reaction rate constants of the photocatalytic reactions in the food processing apparatus according to Examples 1 and 2 were higher than the reaction rate constant of the photocatalytic reaction in the food processing apparatus according to Comparative Example 1. It is understood that the light absorptivity of the catalyst film at the wavelength of ultraviolet light being 50% or more is advantageous in increasing the reaction rate constant of the photocatalytic reaction.
<Evaluation of Thickness of Catalyst Film>
An apparatus 3 shown in
The catalyst film 20s in the sample S was formed by a sol-gel method. A sol was prepared under the same conditions as those for the sol A, and this sol was applied to the support plate 25s by spin coating to form a coating film. This coating film was fired in an electric furnace at 500° C. for 2 hours to obtain the catalyst film 20s. By adjusting the number of times of the formation and firing of the coating film, nine samples S having catalyst films 20s having different thicknesses were prepared. The thicknesses of the catalyst films 20s in these samples were 411.5 nm, 828.0 nm, 1151.0 nm, 1511.5 nm, 2156.0 nm, 2826.5 nm, 3490.5 nm, 4154.5 nm, and 4819.0 nm. The thickness of the catalyst film 20s in each sample S was determined in the same manner as the thickness of the catalyst film according to Example 1.
Three types of monochromatized ultraviolet light having center wavelengths of 330 nm, 350 nm, and 365 nm were adjusted by combining a xenon lamp MAX-303 manufactured by Asahi Spectra Co., Ltd. and a bandpass filter for monochromatization. A light intensity spectrum of each monochromatized ultraviolet light is shown in
A formic acid aqueous solution having a concentration of 10 mg/liter was put in the inside of the container 31. The volume of the formic acid aqueous solution was 5 milliliters. The agitator 33 was rotated to agitate the formic acid aqueous solution. The ultraviolet light U adjusted as described above was directed to the bottom surface of the container 31 and passed through the support plate 25s to irradiate the catalyst film 20s. The concentration of formic acid in a liquid sample taken from the formic acid aqueous solution after a predetermined time elapsed from the irradiation of the catalyst film 20s with the ultraviolet light U was measured by HPLC. A reaction rate constant of a photocatalytic reaction was determined using data regarding a reaction rate obtained from the measurement results and a linear rate equation. The results in the case where the three types of monochromatized ultraviolet light having the center wavelengths of 365 nm, 350 nm, and 330 nm were used for adjusting the ultraviolet light U are shown in
In
The sol A was applied onto a predetermined substrate by spin coating to form a coating film, and this coating film was fired for 2 hours using an electric furnace set at a predetermined temperature in the range of 400° C. to 1000° C., to form a film for XRD measurement. An XRD pattern of the film for XRD measurement was obtained using an XRD apparatus RINT-TTR III manufactured by Rigaku Corporation. Cu-Kα rays were used as X rays. The relative intensity of an anatase phase and the relative intensity of a rutile phase were determined from the obtained XRD pattern. The relationship between these relative intensities and the firing temperature of the coating film is shown in
Food processing apparatuses according to Examples 4, 5, and 6 were produced in the same manner as Example 1, except for the following points. The firing temperature of a sol coating film for an absorption layer and the firing temperature of a sol coating film for a surface layer in the formation of a catalyst film were adjusted as shown in Table 5. The thicknesses of the catalyst films in the food processing apparatuses according to Examples 4, 5, and 6 were measured in the same manner as that of the catalyst film according to Example 1, and were about 2100 nm. The light absorptivities of the catalyst films in the food processing apparatuses according to Examples 4, 5, and 6 at wavelengths of 365 nm, 350 nm, and 330 nm were determined in the same manner as Example 1. As a result, the light absorptivities of the catalyst films according to Examples 4, 5, and 6 were as shown in Table 6. The light absorptivities of each catalyst film at these wavelengths were 50% or more.
Reaction rate constants k of photocatalytic reactions were determined, using a formic acid aqueous solution having a concentration of 10 mg/liter, in the same manner as Example 1, except that the food processing apparatuses according to Examples 4, 5, and 6 were used instead of the food processing apparatus according to Example 1. The relationship between the relative intensities of the anatase phase and the rutile phase in the XRD pattern of the absorption layer estimated from the relationship shown in
<Evaluation of Presence or Absence of Odor>
A sol prepared in the same manner as the sol A was applied onto the support plate 25s made of quartz glass in the apparatus 3 by spin coating to form a coating film. This coating film was fired in an electric furnace at 500° C. for 2 hours. The formation of the coating film and the firing of the coating film were repeated four times to form an absorption layer, and the sol prepared in the same manner as the sol A was applied onto the absorption layer by spin coating to form a coating film. This coating film was fired in an electric furnace at 500° C. for 2 hours to form a surface layer. Thus, a sample J was produced. The support plate 25s had a square shape of 30 square millimeters in a plan view.
A sample K was produced in the same manner as the sample J, except that a layer corresponding to the absorption layer in the sample J was not formed. As a sample L, the support plate 25s was used as it was.
In the apparatus 3, an aqueous yeast solution having a concentration of 10 mg/liter was reacted in the same manner as for the case where the sample S was used, except that each of the samples J, K, and L was used instead of the sample S and the aqueous yeast solution was used instead of the formic acid aqueous solution. A sensory evaluation according to a two-point discrimination test method was conducted by three evaluators for the presence or absence of odor at the liquid sample after the reaction. As a result, when the sample J was used, all the three evaluators did not feel any odor at the liquid sample after the reaction. Meanwhile, when the samples K and L were used, all the three evaluators felt odor at the liquid sample after the reaction. It was suggested that when the sample J was used, deterioration of the components contained in the aqueous yeast solution due to the ultraviolet light did not occur, and when the samples K and L were used, deterioration of the components contained in the aqueous yeast solution due to the ultraviolet light occurred.
The food processing apparatus of the present disclosure is useful in the processing of various types of food containing food materials.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-184171 | Nov 2020 | JP | national |
This application is a continuation of PCT/JP2021/040501 filed on Nov. 4, 2021, which claims foreign priority of Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-184171 filed on Nov. 4, 2020, the entire contents of both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/JP2021/040501 | Nov 2021 | US |
| Child | 18311003 | US |
