The present disclosure relates generally to food products and methods. Aspects of the disclosure are particularly directed to food products comprising multiple proteins, and more specifically an uncooked protein and a cooked protein filler.
It is known to form food products, such as strips of meat. Examples of such formed food products are shown and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/454,597 published as US 2009/0297674 A1 titled “Formed Meat Strip Products And Methods Of Making Such Products” filed May 20, 2009 by Brock Zentz and assigned to Cargill, Incorporated. However, such formed food products do not include a primary protein (such as ground beef) having a non-meat filler (such as cheese).
It is also known to co-extrude food products, where one of the extrudates is a protein such as meat, and the other extrudate is a filler such as cheese. Examples of such co-extruded food products are shown and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/123,449 published as US 2011/0195159 A1 titled “Methods And Systems For Making Co-Extruded Food Products” filed Oct. 8, 2009 by Jay David Parker et al. and assigned to Cargill, Incorporated. However, such co-extruded food products do not include a primary protein (such as ground beef) having a cooked filler (such as bacon) and an uncooked filler (such as cheese).
Accordingly, it would be advantageous to provide a food product comprising a primary protein (such as ground beef) having a cooked filler (such as bacon) and an uncooked filler (such as cheese) and a method for making the same.
Specific details of several embodiments of the disclosure are described below with reference to a food product. One aspect of the present disclosure is directed a food product including a first protein comprising uncooked protein in an amount of about 30 weight percentage (wt. %) to about 95 wt. %. The food product also includes a second protein comprising preserved meat in an amount of about 9 wt. % to about 50 wt. %. The food product also includes a non-meat composition in an amount of about 0 wt % to about 35 wt. %. In some embodiments, the food product may be a patty. In some embodiments, the food product may be a chub.
A food product is shown in
As shown in
Meat block 20 may be a layer that is layered relative to a layer of non-meat filler 60 as shown in
Referring back to
In some embodiments, patty 10 may be a portion of the food product in the form of a chub. The chub may have an uncooked diameter of at least about 6 inches, at least about 5 inches, at least about 4 inches, or at least about 3 inches. The chub may have an uncooked length of at least about 48 inches, at least about 24 inches, at least about 12 inches, or at least about 6 inches. In some embodiments the uncooked weight of the chub may be at least about 20 pounds, at least about 10 pounds, at least about 5 pounds, at least about 3 pounds, at least about 2 pounds, or at least about 1 pound.
In some embodiments, the weight percentage (wt. %) of the meat block is in an amount of about 30 wt. % to about 95 wt. %, about 40 wt. % to about 80 wt. %, or about 50 wt. % to about 70 wt. % relative to the total wt. % of the food product. In some embodiments, the weight percentage of the meat filler is in an amount of about 9 wt. % to about 50 wt. %, about 10 wt % to about 40 wt. %, about 11 wt. % to about 30 wt. %, or about 12 wt. % to about 25 wt. % relative to the total wt. % of the food product. According to a particularly preferred embodiment, the meat filler is in an amount of about 9 wt. % to about 27 wt. %. In some embodiments, the wt. % of the non-meat filler is in an amount of about 0 wt. % to about 35 wt. %, about 5 wt % to about 30 wt. %, of about 10 wt. % to about 25 wt. % relative to the food product. According to a particularly preferred embodiment, the non-meat tiller is in an amount of about 15 wt. % to about 30 wt. %. The ratios of wt. % of the meat block to the meat filler and the non-meat filler may vary according to the particular ingredients according to other alternative embodiments.
In some embodiments, the meat filler is between about 10 wt. % to about 27 wt. %, and the non-meat filler is a cheese at about 0 wt. % to about 35 wt. %, and may vary according to the specific meat of the meat block (e.g. beef and pork). In poultry, the preferred range of the meat filler is about 9 wt % to about 27 wt %, and the preferred range of the non-meat filler (i.e., cheese) is about 15 wt. % to about 30 wt. %.
The meat block may be obtained from any animal protein source such as bovine, porcine, equine, caprine, ovine, avian animals, seafood animals, or any animal commonly harvested for food production. Bovine animals include, but are not limited to buffalo, bison, and all cattle, including steers, heifers, cows, and bulls. Porcine animals include, but are not limited to feeder pigs and breeding pigs, including sows, gilts, bar-rows, and boars. Ovine animals include, but are not limited to, sheep, including ewes, rams, wethers, and lambs. Caprine animals include, but are not limited to, goats, including does, bucks, wethers, and kids. Avian animals include, but are not limited to, birds, including chickens, turkeys, and ostriches (and also include domesticated birds also referred to as poultry). Seafood animals (including from salt water and freshwater sources) include, but are not limited to, fish and shellfish (such as clams, scallops, shrimp, crabs and lobster). Accordingly to a particularly preferred embodiment, the meat block is ground beef with a final grind size of about ⅛ inch.
The meat filler is preferably a preserved meat. Meat preservation methods include, for example, cooking, curing, smoking, dehydrating, and pickling. Cooked meats can include, for example, seasoned or non seasoned cooked beef, pork, lamb, and bison. The cooked meats may be further processed such as by corning, shredding, broiling, flame broiling, grilling, roasting, searing, rotisserie cooking, etc. The cooked meats may be even further processed into a final product such as bacon, hot dog, sausage, cold cuts, etc. Cured meats can include, for example, bacon, ham, prosciutto, salami, pepperoni, etc. According to a preferred embodiment, the meat filler is bacon (e.g., the fatty slab taken from the underside of a pig also referred to as pork belly or side pork). According to alternative embodiments, the meat filler may be a bacon substitute such as turkey bacon, smoked ham, Canadian bacon, pancetta, salt pork, etc. According to an alternative embodiment, the meat filler may be imitation bacon bits (e.g. soy protein).
The non-meat filler is preferably a dairy or milk-based product, and may be a vegetable (e.g., carrots, peas, onions, herbs, etc.), fruit product (e.g., berry, apple, etc.), or other food additive such as a sauce, flavor, or spice according to alternative embodiments. According to a preferred embodiment, the non-meat filler is a cheese such as, for example, fresh cheese (e.g., cream cheese, ricotta cheese, cottage cheese, etc.), soft cheese (e.g., brie, camembert, feta, etc.), semi-soft cheese (e.g., mozzarella, Monterrey jack, muenster, provolone, etc.), semi-firm cheese (e.g., cheddar, Colby, Swiss, etc.), firm cheese (e.g., dry jack, parmesan, Romano, etc.), blue cheese, processed cheese (e.g., American, cheese food, cheese spread), etc. In applications where the food product is produced a co-extrusion product (see e.g., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/123,449 published as US 2011/0195159 A1 titled “Methods And Systems For Making Co-Extruded Food Products” filed Oct. 8, 2009 by Jay David Parker et al. and assigned to Cargill, Incorporated, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) the cheese preferably has a viscosity and a high melting point such that when cooking the food product on the grill or stove, etc., the cheese layer does not melt, flow or ooze out of the food product. According to a preferred embodiment, the cheese does not flow at a temperature of about 180° F.
The food product may be made according to conventional industrial hamburger forming methods. According to one such method, the meat filler and the non-meat filler may be mixed or blended with the meat block and pumped into a mold cavity of a mold plate (or pumped and crimped or cut) at certain intervals in order to form patties (e.g., using a Formax 8000 forming equipment commercially available from Formax Inc. of Mokena, Ill.). According to another such method, the meat block and the filling may be co-extruded, e.g., meat filler such as a slurry of bacon, being pumped in pulses through a tube that is surrounded by a continuous, vertical flow of meat. The meat block is then crimped to enclose the bacon within the meat. Such patties may be formed at a commercial or industrial speed of about 60-100 patties per minute (e.g., using Coex 893 co-extrusion equipment (VEMAG Maschinenbau GmbH, Verden, Germany)).
According to a preferred embodiment, each of the finished food products made at commercial speed using automated equipment is substantially uniform in size and/or shape. By “substantially uniform in size” is meant that a test sample group of food products has an average size variation from one piece to another of less than 10% by weight, and preferably less than 5% by weight. By “substantially uniform in shape” is meant that a test sample group of food products has a shape variation in height, width and length from one piece to another of less than 10% in anyone dimension.
In some embodiments, the meat block is uncooked (e.g., raw) and the meat filler is cooked (e.g., fully cooked). After formation of the food product, the meat block may stay in the fresh (e.g., refrigerated) state, or it may be frozen according to alternative embodiments. In the frozen state, the meat block may be at a temperature of about −10° F. to about 20° F., more preferably about 0° F. to about 10° F. In some embodiments, after formation of the food product, the food product may be heated such that the uncooked meat block is cooked (e.g., fully cooked) to provide a cooked food product. The cooked food product may stay in the fresh (e.g., refrigerated) state, or it may be frozen according to alternative embodiments. In the frozen state, the cooked food product may be at a temperature of about −10° F., to about 20° F., more preferably about 0° F. to about 10° F.
Aspects of certain methods in accordance with aspects of the disclosure are illustrated in the following Examples.
A platform of “stuffed” patties (e.g., a food product) that blend raw meat (e.g., a meat block) with cooked meat (e.g., a primary or meat filler) and cheese (e.g., a secondary or non-meat filler) based on a response surface design of experiments was formulated. By utilizing a Response Surface Design of experiment considering Nine Point Hedonic Testing for overall acceptability, cooked meat liking, cheese liking and along with Just About Right testing (“JAR”) for cooked meat and cheese, panelists evaluated different formulation ranges. Based on a minimum score of 5.5 which is at least a slight liking for hedonic and 65% of panelists thinking the product is “just about right”, desirability ranges were constructed.
A formula range that will produce a desirable platform of “stuffed” burgers which blend a cooked meat (e.g., meat filler) and/or cheese (e.g., non-meat filler) and a raw protein base (e.g., meat block).
A rotatable inscribed central composite design with α=1.4 was employed to formulate beef and chicken patties using a mixture of fully cooked bacon and cheese. The design consisted of four full factorial points (F1 to F4), four axial points (A1 to A4) and four center points (C1 to C4). Twelve treatments were formulated and formed into patties and frozen. From frozen, patties were cooked to 160 F and served to 120 panelists. A Randomized Incomplete Block Design was utilized to serve a maximum of 4 treatments per panelist to avoid sensory fatigue. Samples were presented simultaneously and judges were instructed to cleanse their palate with unsalted crackers and water before and in between samples, independent variables analyzed consisted of cheese (X1) and bacon (X2) percentage ranges. The dependent variables investigated were Just About Right Scales for Cheesiness (Y1) (Not Cheesy Enough to Too Cheesy), Baconiness (Y2) (Not Enough Bacon to Too Much Bacon) and 1-9 Structured Hedonic Scales to evaluate Cheese Impact (Y3), Bacon Impact (Y4) and Overall Acceptability (Y5). Mathematical models containing only the significant terms were generated for each response parameter using multiple linear regression analysis and analysis of variance. A desirability function was calculated to simultaneously optimize JAR and Hedonic scores. Different weights and optimization settings were defined for each response as follows: percentage of JAR for cheesiness and baconiness (maximized for minimum of 65% and a weight of 5); hedonic scores for cheese and bacon (maximized for a minimum of 5.5 and weight of 3) and overall product acceptability (maximized for a minimum of 5.5 and a weight of 1).
Just About Right (“JAR”) Scales: Cheesiness (“Not Cheesy Enough” to “Too Cheesy”); Baconiness (“Not Enough Bacon” to “Too Much Bacon”); Tenderness (“Too Tender” to “Too Tough”); and Flavor (“Not Strong Enough” to “Too Strong”).
1-9 Structured Hedonic Scales were used to evaluate Cheese Impact, Bacon Impact, and Overall Product Acceptability (1=dislike extremely, 2=dislike very much, 3=dislike moderately, 4=dislike slightly, 5=neither like nor dislike, 6=like slightly, 7=like moderately, 8=like very much, 9=like extremely).
Response means were calculated for each treatment and analyzed using JMP Statistical Software, v. 9, 2010 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., USA) under the Response Surface Model platform. A desirability function was calculated to simultaneously optimize JAR and Hedonic scores. Different weights and optimization settings were defined for each response as follows: percentage of JAR for Cheesiness and Baconiness (maximized for minimum of 65% and a weight of 5); hedonic scores for cheese and bacon (maximized for a minimum of 5.5 and weight of 3) and Overall Product Acceptability (maximized for a minimum of 5.5 and a weight of 1).
Panelists were presented with samples corresponding to products with different formulations in the specified ranges based on desirability for either poultry or red meat. Combinations included cooked bacon and cheddar cheese in raw beef, cooked bacon and cheddar cheese in raw chicken, cooked pepperoni with mozzarella cheese in raw chicken, cooked pepperoni with mozzarella in raw pork, cooked ham with Swiss cheese in raw turkey and a blend of cooked meats including salami, pepperoni and ham with provolone cheese in raw beef. They were instructed to cleanse their palate with unsalted crackers and water before and in between samples.
From frozen, patties were cooked to 160° F. and served to at least 64 panelists. Samples were presented one at a time and judges were instructed to cleanse their palate with unsalted crackers and water before and in between samples.
1-9 Structured Hedonic Scales were used to evaluate Overall Flavor and Overall Acceptability (1=dislike extremely, 2=dislike very much, 3=dislike moderately, 4=dislike slightly, 5=neither like nor dislike, 6=like slightly, 7=like moderately, 8=like very much, 9=like extremely).
Data from liking scores was analyzed by ANOVA.
Based on a minimum hedonic score of 5.5 for bacon impact, cheese impact and Overall Acceptability, which is at least a slight liking and 65% of panelists thinking the product is “just about right” for Cheesiness and Baconiness, desirability ranges were created. The results of Phase I are shown in
The results of Phase 11 are shown below in Table 1.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in a sense of “including, but not limited to.” Words using the singular or plural number also include the plural or singular number respectively. When the claims use the word “or” in reference to a list of two or more items, that word covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.
The above detailed descriptions of embodiments of the disclosure are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed above. Although specific embodiments of, and examples for, the invention are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the invention, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while steps are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform steps in a different order. The various embodiments described herein can also he combined to provide further embodiments.
In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above detailed description explicitly defines such terms. While certain aspects of the invention are presented below in certain claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the invention in any number of claim forms. Accordingly, the inventors reserve the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/046511 | 6/19/2013 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61661427 | Jun 2012 | US |