The present disclosure relates generally to food waste disposers, and more specifically, to a vibration isolation mount system for a food waste disposer.
Known domestic food waste disposers typically are rigidly coupled to a sink flange through a highly compressed rubber-mounting gasket. This gasket serves as the primary seal between the sink and the disposer and thus, must be highly compressed to ensure that no leakage occurs during operation. The disposer itself is inherently a vibration source both from the motor operation and from the impacts of food waste against the grind mechanism and the housing. These two sources result in a broad frequency spectrum vibration that is transmitted into the sink, countertop, and cabinet through the connection of the disposer with the sink. While the vibration itself may be annoying, it is also a source of structural noise that can be quite objectionable. This is particularly evident in installations with relatively thin stainless steel sinks, which are excellent resonators
The noise produced by food waste disposers during the course of normal operation is often caused by operation of the motor in combination with the impacting of food waste against the housing of the disposer. Consequently, and in response to these concerns, a number of approaches to the problems of vibration-associated noise in conjunction with normal food waste disposer operation have been attempted.
A flexible coupling between the disposer and the sink can reduce the transmission of the vibration from the disposer into the sink, countertop, cabinet walls and pipes. This in turn can result in noticeable noise reduction. Prior vibration isolation mounts have typically used rubber couplings in conjunction with mechanical means, such as springs. However, not only do these mounts change the plumbing dimensions, but the added components make the installation of the disposer more difficult. Further, the use of rubber in a tension environment can result in the accelerated degradation of the rubber over time, due to creep as well as chemical and aging effects.
Thus, there exists a need for an anti-vibration mount for use in association with a food waste disposer that reduces vibration and associated noise of the food waste disposer during the course of normal operation, retains the original plumbing profile of the food waste disposer, and allows for simple installation.
In accordance with certain aspects of the present application, a vibration isolation system for a food waste disposer is disclosed. The food waste disposer includes a housing defining an inlet opening and a grinding mechanism driven by a motor for grinding food waste received into the housing through the inlet opening. An annular retaining collar has first and second ends. The first end is adjacent the inlet opening and the second end connects to a sink opening, via a standard sink mount, for example. In some embodiments, the first end is received in the inlet opening. An annular elastomeric coupler is situated about the first end of the annular retaining collar and is connected to the housing for vibrationally isolating the annular retaining collar from the housing. The primary loading on the elastomeric material is in shear. Elastomeric materials in shear are particularly effective in absorbing both vibration and shock loads.
In certain exemplary embodiments, the annular elastomeric coupler is positioned inside the housing. In other words, the coupler is below the top cover of the housing and does not extend outside of the housing, minimizing the necessity for plumbing changes as compared to disposers without the disclosed anti-vibration system. In further embodiments, an annular connection member is connected to the housing and surrounds the annular elastomeric coupler such that the annular elastomeric coupler is between the annular retaining collar and the annular connection member.
The following figures form part of the present specification and are included to further demonstrate certain aspects of the present invention. The invention may be better understood by reference to one or more of these figures in combination with the detailed description of specific embodiments presented herein.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
Turning to the figures,
In operation, the food waste delivered to the grinding section by the food conveying section 12 is forced by the grinding lugs against teeth 42 of the shredder ring. The edges of teeth 42 grind the food waste into particulate matter sufficiently small so as to pass from the space above the grind plate to the space below the grind plate via gaps between the teeth 42 outside the periphery of the plate. Due to both gravity and water flow, the particulate matter that passes through the gaps between teeth 42 drops onto base frame 28 and, along with water injected into the disposer via the faucet associated with the sink, is discharged through a discharge outlet 44.
The elastomeric coupler 114 absorbs vibrations generated by the disposer 10, isolating the collar 110, and in turn the mounting assembly 40 and sink, from the vibrations generated by the disposer 10. As such, the elastomeric coupler 114 provides the connection between the retaining collar 110 and the top cover 112 of the housing 18. In certain embodiments, the assembly is insert molded, wherein the collar 110 and the top container covering 112, are inserted into a mold and the elastomeric material is molded around them to form the coupler 114. The retaining collar 110 is made of any suitably rigid material, such as glass-filled nylon, plastic or stainless steel. Suitable materials for the elastomeric coupler 114 include halobutyl rubber (e.g., chlorobutyl rubber (CIIR)) or nitrile rubber (e.g., NBR).
Returning now to the assembly referenced in detail in
When the disposer and anti-vibration mount assembly 100 (with the support flange 70 in place) is to be affixed to the mounting flange 60 (already supported under the sink 30 ), the tabs 78 are positioned so as to meet with the inclining flanges 68 on the mounting flange 60. As a result of inclining flanges 68 being inclined, the tabs 78 can be twisted with respect to the flanges 68, thereby screwing the disposer onto the mounting flange 60 so as to position the disposer in place beneath sink 30. To facilitate turning the support flange 70, the support flange 70 is preferably formed with finger pads 76 (only one is shown for reasons of clarity). As the support flange 70 is twisted into place, it is brought closer to the mounting flange 60 due to the incline flanges 68, thereby compressing the mounting gasket 80.
As shown in
By situating the elastomeric coupler 114 into the container body, the overall height of the unit doesn't change in comparison to units without such an anti-vibration mount. Having the same height as existing disposers eliminates plumbing rework required in replacement installations.
A rubber coupler in tension between the mounting assembly and container body may be somewhat effective in reducing vibration transmission and the accompanying noise. However, rubber in tension may suffer degradation over time due to creep as well as chemical and aging effects. Thus it is desirable to isolate the disposer from the sink using elastomeric material in either compression or shear.
The anti-vibration mount assembly 100 disclosed herein absorbs vibration and shock loads through shear loading of elastomeric material and is effective at reducing vibration transmission. In the illustrated embodiment, the primary load path for the shock loads and vibration absorption is through shearing of the elastomeric material. Moreover, the construction is such that even if the elastomeric coupler were to fail due to long term chemical and aging effects, the disposer would remain functional.
Referring to
Turning now to
The invention has been described in the context of preferred and other embodiments and not every embodiment of the invention has been described. Obvious modifications and alterations to the described embodiments are available to those of ordinary skill in the art. The disclosed and undisclosed embodiments are not intended to limit or restrict the scope or applicability of the invention conceived of by the Applicants, but rather, in conformity with the patent laws, the Applicants intend to protect all such modifications and improvements to the full extent that such falls within the scope or range of equivalent of the following claims.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/625,258 filed Nov. 5, 2004, the contents of all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2743875 | Brezosky et al. | May 1956 | A |
2828084 | Lewis et al. | Mar 1958 | A |
2894698 | Brucken | Jul 1959 | A |
2945635 | Jordan | Jul 1960 | A |
2949246 | Hyde | Aug 1960 | A |
2951650 | Gould | Sep 1960 | A |
2965317 | Jacobs | Dec 1960 | A |
2965318 | Jordan | Dec 1960 | A |
2975986 | Frank | Mar 1961 | A |
3684199 | Bebinger | Aug 1972 | A |
3801998 | Macias | Apr 1974 | A |
3862720 | Guth | Jan 1975 | A |
3982703 | Meyers | Sep 1976 | A |
4310933 | Stratman | Jan 1982 | A |
5409993 | Kojima et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5894869 | Mussack | Apr 1999 | A |
5924261 | Fricke | Jul 1999 | A |
5924635 | Koshimizu et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6007006 | Engel et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6481652 | Strutz et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6719228 | Berger et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6772968 | Jara-Almonte et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6854673 | Strutz et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
20020104908 | Berger et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040195409 | Berger et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11-090688 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2002-082957 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2002-225558 | Mar 2004 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060097091 A1 | May 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60625258 | Nov 2004 | US |