Food/Beverage Article

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20230276831
  • Publication Number
    20230276831
  • Date Filed
    August 02, 2021
    2 years ago
  • Date Published
    September 07, 2023
    9 months ago
Abstract
A food/beverage article, comprising: one or more compounds represented by formula (I):
Description

The present invention relates to a food/beverage article containing an oxygen-containing heterocyclic compound.


BACKGROUND ART

Low fungus-resistant food/beverage articles such as low-salt soy sauce and ready-to-use Japanese seasoned soup stock containing a small amount of salt have been distributed due to an increase in the health orientation of consumers and the like in recent years. If such low fungus-resistant food/beverage articles are contaminated with lactic acid bacteria, the food/beverage articles are deteriorated, resulting in, for example, pH change due to the generation of lactic acid or the decarboxylation of amino acids, and the deformation of the containers due to the generation of carbonic acid gas, and thus the qualities of products are markedly spoiled disadvantageously (for example, Non Patent Literature 1). Also, if low fungus-resistant food/beverage articles are contaminated with flat sour bacteria, the contents are acidified due to acid production and the qualities of products are markedly spoiled disadvantageously (for example, Non Patent Literature 2).


CITATION LIST
Non Patent Literature
Non Patent Literature 1



  • JOURNAL OF THE BREWING SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2008, Vol. 103, No. 2, p. 94-99



Non Patent Literature 2




  • B. coagulans, edited by Tateo Fujii, Fundamentals of Food Microbiology, KODANSHA LTD., 2015, p. 15



SUMMARY OF INVENTION
Technical Problem

Examples of means for suppressing the deterioration of food/beverage articles due to contamination with lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria include synthetic preservative addition, an increase in the amount of salt and/or alcohol, and acidification by reducing the pH. It cannot, however, be said that any method described above is desirable in view of health orientation and the savor of food.


An object of the present invention is to provide a food/beverage article that is unlikely to be deteriorated due to lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria contamination without depending on these methods.


Solution to Problem

As a result of earnest studies to solve the above-mentioned problem, the present inventors have consequently found that an oxygen-containing heterocyclic compound such as licoricidin represented by the following formula (I) exhibits antimicrobial activity to lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria, and completed the present invention based on the finding.


Specifically, the present invention provides a food/beverage article comprising: one or more compounds represented by the following formula (I):




embedded image


wherein, R1 and R3 each independently represent a hydrogen atom or a C2-6 alkenyl group, R2 and R4 each independently represent a hydrogen atom or a C1-4 alkyl group, R5 and R7 each independently represent a hydrogen atom or a hydroxyl group, R6 represents a hydrogen atom or a C2-6 alkenyl group, X represents a direct bond, —CH2—, —CH═, or —C(═O)—, Y represents —CH2—, —CH═, or —C(═O)—, and a bond represented by the following formula:





[Chemical Formula 2]



custom-character represents a single bond or a double bond (hereinafter also referred to as a “compound (I)”), wherein the total of the concentrations of the compounds is 1 ppm or more. Since the food/beverage article of the present invention contains the compound (I) at 1 ppm or more, the food/beverage article exhibits antimicrobial activity to lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria, and is unlikely to be deteriorated due to lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria contamination.


It is preferable that the compound (I) be at least one selected from the group consisting of licoricidin, gancaonin I, 8-(γ,γ-dimethylallyl)-wighteone, glycycoumarin, glyasperin C, glycyrin, isoangustone A, and licoarylcoumarin.


The food/beverage article of the present invention may be liquid seasoning or food. The above-mentioned liquid seasoning may be soy sauce, soup stock, Japanese seasoned soup stock, sauce, dressing, or cooking vinegar, and the above-mentioned food may be lightly-pickled vegetables.


The present invention provides an antimicrobial agent to lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria, comprising: the compound (I) as an active ingredient.


The present invention provides a method for suppressing the proliferation of lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria in the food/beverage article, comprising: adjusting the total of the concentrations of the compounds (I) in the food/beverage article to 1 ppm or more.


Advantageous Effects of Invention

According to the present invention, a food/beverage article is unlikely to be deteriorated due to lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria contamination can be provided. According to the present invention, a novel antimicrobial agent to lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria can be provided. According to the present invention, a method for suppressing the proliferation of lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria in the food/beverage article can be provided.







DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail. However, the present invention is not limited to the following embodiments.


A food/beverage article according to the present embodiment contains a compound represented by the following formula (I) at 1 ppm or more:




embedded image


wherein, R1 and R3 each independently represent a hydrogen atom or a C3-6 alkenyl group, R2 and R4 each independently represent a hydrogen atom or a C1-4 alkyl group, R5 and R7 each independently represent a hydrogen atom or a hydroxyl group, R6 represents a hydrogen atom or a C2-6 alkenyl group, X represents a direct bond, —CH2—, —CH═, or —C(═O)—, Y represents —CH2—, —CH═, or —C(═O)—, and a bond represented by the following formula:





[Chemical Formula 4]



custom-character represents a single bond or a double bond.


The “C1-4 alkyl group” used herein means a linear or branched alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms. Examples of the C1-4 alkyl group include a methyl group, an ethyl group, a propyl group, an isopropyl group, a butyl group, an isobutyl group, a sec-butyl group, and a tert-butyl group.


The “C2-6 alkenyl group” used herein means a linear or branched alkenyl group having 2 to 6 carbon atoms. Examples of the C2-6 alkenyl group include a vinyl group, a propen-1-yl group, a propen-2-yl group, a 1-butenyl group, a 2-butenyl group, a 3-butenyl group, a 1-methyl-1-propenyl group, a 2-methyl-1-propenyl group, a 1-pentenyl group, a 2-pentenyl group, a 3-pentenyl group, a 4-pentenyl group, a 5-pentenyl group, a 1-methyl-1-butenyl group, a 2-methyl-1-butenyl group, a 3-methyl-1-butenyl group, a 4-methyl-1-butenyl group, a 1-methyl-2-butenyl group, a 2-methyl-2-butenyl group, a 3-methyl-2-butenyl group, a 4-methyl-2-butenyl group, a 1-methyl-3-butenyl group, a 2-methyl-3-butenyl group, a 3-methyl-3-butenyl group, a 4-methyl-3-butenyl group, a 1,2-dimethyl-1-propenyl group, a 1,1-dimethyl-2-propenyl group, a 1-hexenyl group, a 2-hexenyl group, a 3-hexenyl group, a 4-hexenyl group, a 5-hexenyl group, and a 6-hexenyl group.


In above-mentioned formula (I), R1 is preferably a hydrogen atom, a 3-methyl-2-butenyl group, or a 1,1-dimethyl-2-propenyl group.


In above-mentioned formula (I), R2 is preferably a hydrogen atom or a methyl group.


In above-mentioned formula (I), R3 is preferably a hydrogen atom or a 3-methyl-2-butenyl group.


In above-mentioned formula (I), R4 is preferably a hydrogen atom or a methyl group.


In above-mentioned formula (I), R6 is preferably a hydrogen atom or a 3-methyl-2-butenyl group.


The compound (I) may have isomers such as stereoisomers and tautomers. Those isomers are also included in the scope of the present invention.


Specific examples of the compound (I) include licoricidin, gancaonin I, 8-(γ,γ-dimethylallyl)-wighteone, glycycoumarin, glyasperin C, glycyrin, isoangustone A, and licoarylcoumarin.


Licoricidin is also called 4-[(R)-7-hydroxy-5-methoxy-6-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)chroman-3-yl]-2-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-1,3-benzenediol, and is a known compound represented by the following formula:




embedded image


Gancaonin I is also called 5-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-2-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-4,6-dimethoxybenzofuran, and is a known compound represented by the following formula:




embedded image


8-(7,7-Dimethylallyl)-wighteone is also called 6,8-bis(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one, and is a known compound represented by the following formula:




embedded image


Glycycoumarin is also called 3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-7-hydroxy-5-methoxy-6-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one, and is a known compound represented by the following formula:




embedded image


Glyasperin C is also called (3R)-3β(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-7-ol, and is a known compound the following formula:




embedded image


Glycyrin is also called 3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dimethoxy-6-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one, and is a known compound represented by the following formula:




embedded image


Isoangustone A is also called 3-[3,4-dihydroxy-5-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)phenyl]-5,7-dihydroxy-6-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one, and is a known compound represented by the following formula:




embedded image


Licoarylcoumarin is also called 3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-7-hydroxy-5-methoxy-8-(2-methyl-3-butene-2-yl)coumarin, and is a known compound represented by the following formula:




embedded image


The compound (I) may be synthesized by a method known to those skilled in the art, or may be a commercially available product. Licoricidin, gancaonin I, 8-(γ,γ-dimethylallyl)-wighteone, glycycoumarin, glyasperin C, glycyrin, isoangustone A, and licoarylcoumarin are known to be compounds contained in licorice oily extract. Accordingly, in the food/beverage article according to the present embodiment, licorice oily extract containing the compound (I) can also be used as it is, or the compound (I) contained in licorice oily extract can be isolated therefrom before use.


The food/beverage article according to the present embodiment may contain only one compound (I), or may contain two or more compounds (I). When the food/beverage article according to the present embodiment contains two or more compounds (I), the concentration of the compounds (I) means the total concentration of the concentrations of the compounds.


In the food/beverage article according to the present embodiment, the concentration of the compound (I) is 1 ppm or more, in terms of the lower limit. This enables suppression of the deterioration of the food/beverage article due to lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria contamination. The concentration of the compound (I) can be suitably set to the range of 1 ppm or more according to the use of the food/beverage article, the salt concentration, the alcohol concentration, the pH, and the like, and the concentration of the compound (I) may be, for example, 5 ppm or more, may be 10 ppm or more, may be 25 ppm or more, or may be 50 ppm or more in view of further enhancing the antimicrobial activity to lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria.


In the food/beverage article according to the present embodiment, the upper limit of the concentration of the compound (I) is not particularly limited, and the concentration of the compound (I) may be, for example, 10000 ppm or less in view of dissolving the compound (I) in the target food/beverage article adequately.


For example, the concentration of the compound (I) can be measured by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS).


The food/beverage article according to the present embodiment may be any food/beverage article without particular limitation, as long as it is a food/beverage article containing the compound (I) at 1 ppm or more. Examples of the food/beverage article according to the present embodiment include liquid seasonings such as soy sauce, soup stock, Japanese seasoned soup stock, sauce, soup, Worcester sauce, and dressing; semisolid seasonings such as miso and mayonnaise; pickled Japanese plums; pickles; and delicatessen. It is preferable that the food/beverage article according to the present embodiment be liquid seasoning or food, since the deterioration due to lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria contamination can be further suppressed. Soy sauce, soup stock, Japanese seasoned soup stock, sauce, dressing, or cooking vinegar is preferable among the liquid seasonings. Lightly-pickled vegetables are preferable among the foods.


Although the salt concentration of the food/beverage article according to the present embodiment is not particularly limited, the salt concentration may be, for example, 12% (w/v) or less, 8% (w/v) or less, 4% (w/v) or less, or 0% (w/v) (unsalted), in view of enhancing the antimicrobial activity to lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria without increasing the amount of salt.


For example, the salt concentration can be measured by a known method such as potentiometric titration, the Mohr method, or atomic absorption spectrophotometry.


Although the alcohol concentration of the food/beverage article according to the present embodiment is not particularly limited, the alcohol concentration may be, for example, 10% (v/v) or less, 5% (v/v) or less, or 0% (v/v), in view of enhancing the antimicrobial activity to lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria without increasing the amount of alcohol.


For example, the alcohol concentration can be measured by gas chromatography.


Although the pH of the food/beverage article according to the present embodiment is not particularly limited, the pH may be, for example, 3.0 or more, 4.0 or more, or 4.2 or more, and may be 7.0 or less, 6.0 or less, or 5.8 or less, since the savor of the food/beverage article is good.


The food/beverage articles according to the present embodiment can be produced by, for example, adding licorice oily extract containing the compound (I) or the compound (I) to a food/beverage article as a base (preferably liquid seasoning or food) to a concentration of 1 ppm or more, and, if necessary, diluting or concentrating (e.g., deaeration, heating, drying, heating and deaeration at reduced pressure) the resultant and adding various additives, for example.


As confirmed in the following Examples, the compound (I) exhibits antimicrobial action on lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria. Therefore, one aspect of the present invention provides an antimicrobial agent to lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria containing the compound (I) as an active ingredient.


The antimicrobial agent according to the present embodiment can be used for various harm lactic acid bacteria (lactic acid bacteria encompassed by, for example, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, and Lactococcus) and flat sour bacteria (for example, Bacillus coagulans).


The antimicrobial agent according to the present embodiment may be any of forms such as a solid (for example, powder), liquid (for example, a solution or a suspension), and a paste. The antimicrobial agent may be any dosage form such as powder, granules, a tablet, a capsule, a solution, a suspension, or a syrup. The above-mentioned various formulations can be prepared by mixing Licoricidin with additives (a vehicle, a binder, a lubricant, a disintegrator, an emulsifier, a surfactant, a base, a solubilizer, a suspending agent, and the like) and molding the resulting mixture, as needed.


The antimicrobial agent according to the present embodiment can be used by adding it to any food/beverage article. Examples of such a food/beverage article include liquid seasonings such as soy sauce, soup stock, Japanese seasoned soup stock, sauce, soup, Worcestershire sauce, dressing, and cooking vinegar; semisolid seasonings such as miso and mayonnaise; pickled Japanese plums; pickles; and delicatessen.


As confirmed in the following Examples, the compound (I) exhibits the action of suppressing the proliferation of lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria. Therefore, one aspect of the present invention provides a method for suppressing the proliferation of lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria in a food/beverage article, comprising: adjusting the total of the concentrations of the compounds (I) in the food/beverage article to 1 ppm or more.


EXAMPLES

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described by way of Examples more specifically. However, the present invention is not limited by the following Examples.


Test Example 1: Antimicrobial Action of Edible Plant Extracts on Lactic Acid Bacteria
(Preparation of Extract)

To pulverized leaves, stems, or roots of commercially available edible plants (described in Tables 1 and 2) was added sterilized water in the same amount as that of the pulverized material, and the mixture was stirred and mixed with a vortex and left to stand at room temperature for 1 hour. To this mixture was added ethanol in 3 times the volume of the sterilized water, and extraction was performed in an incubator under the conditions of 50° C. and 120 rpm (reciprocal shaking) for 3 hours to obtain 75% ethanol extraction liquid. This extraction liquid was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes to obtain extracts.


(Preparation of Soy Sauce)

Commercially available low-salt soy sauce (produced by Kikkoman Corporation) was two-fold diluted with sterilized water. The pH of the dilution was adjusted to 4.8 with sodium hydroxide, and the mixture was heat-disinfected to prepare test low-salt soy sauce.


(Evaluation of Antimicrobial Action)

First, 11.3 mL of test low-salt soy sauce, 0.7 mL of the extract, and lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus rennini and Lactobacillus acidlipiscis) were added to a test tube to a final concentration of around 105 cfu/mL, and a SILICOSEN was put in the test tube. The mixture was left to stand at 30° C. for anaerobic culture. The proliferation of lactic acid bacteria produces precipitate of bacterial cells; accordingly, the precipitate produced on the bottom of the test tube was observed over time. The number of days until the generation of the precipitation started in the test, to which the extract was added, was compared with that in a control (mixture to which an aqueous 75% ethanol solution was added instead of the extract), to evaluate the antimicrobial action. The results are shown in Tables 1 and 2.












TABLE 1








Difference in




the number of




days until



Edible plant
precipitation









Kachiwari (pumpkin)
No difference



Ogato (pumpkin)
No difference



Kamikochi (cucumber)
No difference



Bateshirazu (cucumber)
No difference



Myoko (tomato)
No difference



Heart-heart (tomato)
No difference



Chako (cherry tomato)
No difference



Brazil cook (cooking tomato)
No difference



Shin-etsu mizunasu
No difference



Native aonasu
No difference



Manganji-amato
No difference



Kurokodama-suika
No difference



Tenchoha (makuwa)
No difference



Chikumano-gosun (carrot)
Difference of




less than 3 days



Eruwan (leaf lettuce)
No difference



Erugo (butterhead lettuce)
No difference



Shimamura kidney bean
No difference



Koshigaya kidney bean
No difference



Mochitto-corn
No difference



Kiso purple turnip
No difference



Shinkaiaona (komatsuna)
No difference



Yasaiegoma
No difference



Fukkura (ruccola)
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Curled mallow
No difference



Kawashima kakina
No difference



Amaranth
No difference



Black-eyed pea
No difference



Spontaneous green pepper
No difference



Cherry tomato
No difference



Miyashige (daikon)
No difference



Radish
No difference



Beet
No difference



Green coin (tatsoi)
No difference



Anton (squash)
No difference



Y-star (squash)
No difference



Celery
Difference of




less than 3 days



White Lisbon (long Welsh onion)
No difference



Leek (Welsh onion)
No difference



Chinese chive
No difference



Coriander
No difference



Italian parsley
Difference of




less than 3 days



Rocket (rucola)
Difference of




less than 3 days



Rocky wild (rucola)
Difference of




less than 3 days



Sage
No difference



Time
No difference



Sweet basil
No difference



Sweet marjoram
No difference



Lemon basil
No difference



Lemon balm
No difference



Petra (basil)
No difference



Bouquet (dill)
Difference of




7 days or more



Nasturtium
Difference of




3 to 6 days



German chamomile
No difference



Naga-san (pumpkin)
No difference



White cucumber (cucumber)
No difference



Spontaneous odama (tomato)
No difference



Bonita (tomato)
No difference



Broccoli
No difference



Red cabbage
No difference



White radish sprout
No difference



Tsumamina
No difference



Turnip
No difference



Buckwheat
No difference



Water spinach
Difference of




less than 3 days



Rocket
Difference of




less than 3 days



Basil
No difference



Mustard
Difference of




less than 3 days



White sesame
No difference



Nozawana
No difference



Green pea
No difference



Black mappe
No difference



Alphalpha
No difference



Perilla
No difference



Endive
No difference



Kale
No difference



Soup celery
Difference of




7 days or more



Fennel
Difference of




less than 3 days



Mike-takana
No difference



Green mappe
No difference



Bean sprout
No difference



Papaya
No difference



Koryan-mai mochi
No difference



Red rice
No difference



Black rice
No difference



Linseed
No difference



Amaranth
No difference



Perilla
No difference



Quinoa
No difference



Poppy seed
No difference



Chicory
Difference of




less than 3 days



Winter melon (seed)
Difference of




less than 3 days



Pino green
No difference



Green spinach
No difference



Red beet
No difference



Red Asian mustard
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Tatsoi
No difference



Choy sum
No difference



Aonaga daikon
No difference



Koshin daikon
No difference



Benimaru daikon
No difference



Napa cabbage
No difference



Purple-stem mustard
No difference



Shiroziku Pak choi
No difference



Sweet marjoram
No difference



Chervil
No difference



Chive
No difference



Peppermint
No difference



Watercress
No difference



Borage
No difference



Coriander
No difference



Artichoke
No difference



Crimson clover
No difference



Nigella
No difference



Nagaokana
No difference



Osakashirona
No difference



Hiroshimana
No difference



Katsuona
No difference



Kumamotokyona
No difference



Yamashiona
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Mibuna
No difference



Bashona
No difference



Kobutakana
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Kalonji/Nigella
No difference



Kumquat seed
No difference



Bitter melon seed
No difference



Pomegranate seed
No difference



Prune seed
No difference



Coriander
No difference



Basil
Difference of




less than 3 days



Cayenne pepper
No difference



Parsley
No difference



Habanero
No difference



Paprika
No difference



Fenugreek
No difference



Fennel
No difference



Bhut Jolokia
No difference



Fried onion
No difference



Marjoram
No difference



Onion powder
No difference



Red pepper/chili
No difference



Lemon grass
Difference of




less than 3 days



Kiwi fruit seed extract
No difference



Cacao extract
No difference



Perilla seed extract
No difference



Chinese chive seed extract
No difference



Broccoli sprout
No difference



Yuzu seed extract
No difference



Kanka extract
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Japanese butterbur extra
No difference



Buckwheat leaf extract
No difference



Satsuma orange extract
No difference



Fermented rice germ extract
No difference



Black rice extract
No difference



Red rice extract
No difference



Papaya peel
No difference



Dragon fruit peel
No difference



Prune peel
No difference



Yuzu seed
No difference



Karin seed
No difference



Sicklefruit fenugreek
No difference



Ginger (herb tea)
Difference of




7 days or more



Stevia leaf (herb tea)
Difference of




less than 3 days




















TABLE 2








Difference in




the number of




days until



Edible plant
precipitation









Dandelion leaf (herb tea)
No difference



Dandelion root (herb tea)
No difference



Peppermint (herb tea)
Difference of




7 days or more



Horsetail (herb tea)
Difference of




less than 3 days



Watercress (raw, aboveground portion)
Difference of




less than 3 days



Rape (raw, aboveground portion)
No difference



Dropwort (raw, aboveground portion)
No difference



Nettle (herb tea)
No difference



Mallow blue (herb tea)
No difference



Yuzu ichimi
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Ginger (powder)
Difference of




7 days or more



Turmeric (powder)
No difference



Poppy sheet
No difference



Bee pollen
No difference



Vanilla bean (whole)
No difference



Chinese wolfberry fruit
No difference



Gardenia fruit (whole)
No difference



Parsley
No difference



Udo (raw, aboveground portion)
Difference of




7 days or more



Coriander (raw, whole grass)
Difference of




less than 3 days



Fennel (raw, aboveground portion)
Difference of




less than 3 days



Sweet basil (freeze-dried)
Difference of




7 days or more



Kaffir lime (whole)
No difference



Lemon grass (whole)
No difference



Orange flower (herb tea)
No difference



Lavender (herb tea)
Difference of




less than 3 days



Verbena (herb tea)
No difference



Coconut long
No difference



Blue poppy seed
No difference



Mango powder
Difference of




less than 3 days



Ginger powder
Difference of




7 days or more



Wild herb tea jack bean
No difference



Wild herb tea field horsetail
No difference



Wild herb tea mulberry leaf
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Wild herb tea aloe
No difference



Burdock powder
No difference



Sprouted brown rice powder
No difference



Spinach powder
No difference



Carrot powder
No difference



Pumpkin powder
No difference



Wild herb tea persimmon leaf
No difference



Wild herb tea corn
No difference



Wild herb tea five-leaf ginseng
No difference



Wild herb tea pu-erh tea
No difference



Wild herb tea simon tea
No difference



Wild herb tea reishi
No difference



Wild herb tea loquat leaf
No difference



Wild herb tea plantain
No difference



Wild herb tea mugwort
No difference



Wild herb tea lotus leaf
No difference



Wild herb tea Veitch's bamboo
No difference



Wild herb tea dokudami
No difference



Wild herb tea roasted green tea
No difference



Wild herb tea buckwheat tea
No difference



Wild herb tea senna tea
No difference



Wild herb tea Chinese wolfberry fruit
No difference



Komatsuna powder
No difference



Lemon powder
No difference



Purple sweet potato powder
No difference



Lotus root powder
No difference



Corn powder
No difference



Yuzu powder
No difference



Bamboo peel
No difference



Hard rush
No difference



Cherry leaf, green
No difference



Cherry life, brown
No difference



Veitch's bamboo, domestic, dark green
No difference



Veitch's bamboo, Chinese, green
No difference



Okra powder
No difference



Edamame powder
No difference



Horsetail tea
No difference



Tomato powder
No difference



Garlic powder
No difference



Dandelion coffee
No difference



Black soybean flour
No difference



Jew's mallow powder
No difference



Jerusalem artichoke powder
No difference



Kintoki ginger powder
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Green barley powder
No difference



lees of linseed oil, undried
No difference



Sweet potato powder
No difference



Cabbage powder
No difference



Yacon leaf powder
Difference of




less than 3 days



Red beefsteak plant powder
Difference of




less than 3 days



Ashitaba powder
No difference



Ginger powder
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Yacon potato powder
No difference



Shitake powder
No difference



Celery powder
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Wild turmeric powder
Difference of




7 days or more



Cleavers
No difference



Hibiscus
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Skull cap
No difference



Sweet clover
No difference



Spinach
No difference



Broccoli
No difference



Superior (lettuce)
No difference



Swiss chard
No difference



California red (paprika)
No difference



Red chicory
Difference of




less than 3 days



Oresh (endive)
No difference



Tokyo bekana (mustard greens)
No difference



Green romaine
No difference



Red romaine
No difference



Green oak
No difference



Red oak
No difference



Baby purple
No difference



Chirimen mustard
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Bok choy
No difference



Water spinach
No difference



Cardamon
Difference of




7 days or more



Korean red pepper
No difference



Caraway
Difference of




7 days or more



Mustard seed/brown
No difference



Mustard seed/yellow
No difference



Mustard/yellow
No difference



Ginkgo (herb tea)
Difference of




7 days or more



Safflower (herb tea)
No difference



Rosemary
No difference



Bird's eye
Difference of




less than 3 days



Kesshoku
No difference




Atractylodes rhizome

Difference of




7 days or more



Dong quai
No difference




Astragalus root

No difference



Byakushi
Difference of




less than 3 days



Dried magnolia leaf
No difference



Radish
No difference



Garland chrysanthemum
No difference



Green onion sprout
No difference



Japanese honewort
Difference of




7 days or more



Pink radish
No difference



Green radish
No difference



Vitamin-na
No difference



Onion
No difference



Ginger mince
Difference of




7 days or more



Tamarind
No difference



Tarragon/Estragon
Difference of




7 days or more



Citrus unshiu peel
Difference of




less than 3 days



Dill weed
Difference of




less than 3 days



Dill seed
Difference of




7 days or more



Dry onion
No difference



Nutmeg
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Red jujube
No difference



Kinshinsai
No difference



Broccoli powder
No difference



Lemon peel
Difference of




7 days or more



Japanese pepper
No difference



Purple shallot (red onion)
No difference



Ashitaba powder
Difference of




less than 3 days



Black rice powder
No difference



Angelica
No difference



German chamomile
Difference of




3 to 6 days



Yam powder
No difference



Kale powder
No difference



Mulberry leaf powder
No difference




Gymnema sylvestre powder

No difference



Dried immature orange powder
No difference



Licorice powder
Difference of




7 days or more










Test Example 2: Sensory Evaluation

For 19 extracts the antimicrobial action of which was found (the difference from the control was 7 days or more in the number of days until the proliferation) in Test Example 1, whether the extract was suitable as an ingredient in view of fragrance and taste was sensory evaluated using the following evaluation criterion by a trained evaluator. The results are shown in Table 3. In the cell of “portion used” in the table, 1 indicates seed (seed coat) or fruit (fruit coat), 2 indicates leaves, stems, flowers, or trunks, and 3 indicates roots.


Evaluation Criterion













TABLE 3






Portion


Overall


Material
used
Fragrance
Taste
rating







Bouquet (Dill)
1
Δ

X


Japanese honewort
1
Δ

X


Soup celery
1
Δ

X


Ginger mince
3

Δ
Δ


Tarragon/Estragon
2

Δ
Δ


Dill seed
1
Δ

X


Cardamon
1
X

X


Caraway
1
Δ

X


Ginkgo (Herb tea)
2
Δ

X


Ginger (Herb tea)
3

Δ
Δ


Peppermint (Herb tea)
2
Δ

X


Ginger (powder)
3

Δ
Δ


Udo (raw, aboveground portion)
2
Δ

X


Sweet basil (freeze-dried)
2
X

X


Lemon peel
1
Δ

Δ


Ginger powder
3

Δ
Δ



Atractylodes rhizome

2
Δ

X


Wild turmeric powder
3
Δ

X


Licorice powder
3








Evaluation Criterion


◯: Suitable as an ingredient


Δ: Less suitable as an ingredient


X: Absolutely not suitable as an ingredient


—: Not evaluated






It was estimated from Table 3 that the extract of licorice powder was the most suitable as an ingredient in the overall rating. The extract was added to commercially available low-salt soy sauce (produced by Kikkoman Corporation) to 100 ppm and subjected to sensory evaluation in terms of fragrance and taste by a panel consisting of five trained evaluators. As a result, it was confirmed that the flavor of the low-salt soy sauce was not impaired, and that the extract was suitable as an ingredient.


Test Example 3: Identification of a Substance in Licorice Powder Having Antimicrobial Action on Lactic Acid Bacteria
(Preparation of Extract)

To 1 kg of licorice powder (NIPPON FUNMATSU YAKUHIN Co., LTD.) was added 5 L of chloroform (KANTO CHEMICAL CO., INC.), and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 hours and then filtered using a folded filter paper (5C). This filtrate was concentrated to dryness using an evaporator to obtain 11 g of an extract.


(Fraction of Substance Having Antimicrobial Action)

A column (3 L) was filled with silica gel (Disogel IR-60-40/63A Cat. 1002A). Around 11 g of the above-mentioned obtained extract was dissolved in around 30 ml of chloroform, and the mixture was fractionated into 13 fractions (A to M in order of elution) with the following solvents sequentially while monitoring by TLC analysis at a flow rate of 40 ml/minute and at 220 nm.

    • 1) Hexane (6 L)
    • 2) Hexane:ethyl acetate=4:1 (10 L)
    • 3) Hexane:ethyl acetate=3:1 (12 L)
    • 4) Hexane:ethyl acetate=2:1 (10 L)


(Evaluation of Antimicrobial Action of Fractions)

Each fraction was added to a plate count agar with BCP (Nissui) to 200 μg/mL, 67 μg/mL, 22 μg/mL, or 7 μg/mL. Then, 1 platinum loop of a bacterial suspension of lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus rennini and Lactobacillus acidipiscis, 106 to 107 cfu/mL) was applied. The bacteria were subjected to anaerobic culture at 30° C. for 8 days, and the effect of suppressing the proliferation of lactic acid bacteria was evaluated. In the evaluation, the antimicrobial unit of each of the fractions was calculated using the following expression (1), and the ratio of contribution to the antimicrobial action was calculated from the obtained antimicrobial unit of the fraction using the following expression (2). The results are shown in Table 4.





Antimicrobial unit of a fraction 100/concentration at which the fraction exhibits antimicrobial action×fraction volume  Expression (1):





Rate of contribution to antimicrobial action (%)=(antimicrobial unit of the fraction/antimicrobial unit of all fractions)×100  Expression (2):













TABLE 4







Active





Amount of
concentration
Antimicrobial
Contribution


Fraction
fraction (g)
(μg/mL)
unit of fraction
rate (%)



















A
0.3
>200




B
1.3
>200




C
0.2
>200




D
0.82
>200




E
0.73
>200




F
0.2
22
0.91
14.5


G
0.31
200
0.16
2.5


H
0.21
200
0.11
1.7


I
0.86
22
3.91
62.2


J
0.33
200
0.16
2.6


K
0.41
200
0.2
3.3


L
0.61
200
0.31
4.9


M
1.06
200
0.53
8.4









As clear from Table 4, it was observed that the fractions F and I each had strong antimicrobial action, and it was strongly estimated that the main antimicrobial component of licorice powder was contained especially in the fraction I. Then, the 13C-NMR spectrum was measured to identify the antimicrobial component contained in the fraction I. Consequently, the antimicrobial component was estimated to be licoricidin, and when the 13C-NMR spectrum of the antimicrobial component was compared with the 13C-NMR spectrum of the preparation (produced by ChemFaces), it was confirmed that both match each other. When the antimicrobial component was subjected to TOF (time-of-flight) mass spectrometry, it was confirmed that the antimicrobial component exhibits the peak of [M+H]+ at an m/z of 425, as with licoricidin.


Test Example 4: Antimicrobial Action of Licoricidin on Lactic Acid Bacteria in Liquid Seasoning (1)
(1) Production of Liquid Seasonings
(Production of Soy Sauce)

Commercially available whole soybean soy sauce (produced by Kikkoman Corporation) was electrodialyzed and then concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain soy sauce at a salt concentration of 0% (w/v) and an alcohol concentration of 0% (v/v). Then, salt and/or alcohol was added to the above-mentioned obtained soy sauce, and the mixture was heat-treated to produce soy sauces at salt concentrations and alcohol concentrations shown in the following Table 5. The pHs of the soy sauces were 4.9 to 5.0.












TABLE 5







Salt concentration
Alcohol concentration



(%(w/v))
(%(v/v))



















0
0




5




10



4
0




5




10



8
0




5




10



12
0




5




10










(Production of Bonito Stock)


Bonito stocks was produced using materials shown in the following Table 6. Specifically, components contained in dried bonito was extracted with alcohol and water; sugar, salt, and seasonings were blended with the obtained extract; and the resulting mixture was heated to produce bonito stock. The salt concentration of the obtained bonito stock was 0.2% (w/v), the alcohol concentration was 0.15% (v/v), and the pH was 6.1.












TABLE 6







Ingredient
Amount blended




















Dried bonito
7.5
g



Sugar
3.2
g



Salt
2.0
g



Seasonings (amino acids
4.0
g



and the like)



Alcohol
1.5
mL



Water
993
mL



Total
1000
mL










(Production of Sauce)


Sauce was produced using materials shown in the following Table 7. Specifically, Koikuchi soy sauce (produced by Kikkoman Corporation), granulated sugar, potato starch, and water were blended in amounts shown in following Table 7, and the resulting mixture was heated to produce sauce. The salt concentration of the obtained sauce was 5.3% (w/v), the alcohol concentration was 0.8% (v/v), and the pH was 5.0.












TABLE 7







Ingredient
Amount blended (g)



















Koikuchi soy sauce
354.6



Granulated sugar
121



Dogtooth violet starch
20



Water
504.4



Total
1000










(Production of Japanese Seasoned Soup Stock)


Japanese seasoned soup stock was produced using materials shown in following Table 8. Specifically, the components contained in dried bonito was extracted with water; Koikuchi soy sauce (produced by Kikkoman Corporation), sugar, and salt were blended with the obtained extract; and the resulting mixture was heated to produce Japanese seasoned soup stock. The salt concentration of the obtained Japanese seasoned soup stock was 3% (w/v), the alcohol concentration was 0.4% (v/v), and the pH was 5.5.












TABLE 8







Ingredient
Amount blended




















Koikuchi soy sauce
105
mL



Dried bonito
31.3
g



Sugar
40
g



Salt
13.6
g



Water
888
mL



Total
1000
mL










(2) Evaluation of Antimicrobial Action


Licoricidin (produced by ChemFaces) was added to each of the liquid seasonings produced in the above-mentioned (1) to concentrations of 1 ppm, 5 ppm, 10 ppm, 25 ppm, and 50 ppm. Lactic acid bacteria described in the following Table 9 were then added to 106 to 107 cells/mL and cultured at 30° C. for 7 days. After the culture, the number of lactic acid bacteria was measured using the GAM agar medium “Nissui”. Liquid seasoning to which licoricidin was not added was used as a control group, and the antimicrobial activity was evaluated in comparison with the number of lactic acid bacteria in the control group. The evaluation was performed using the criterion shown below. The results are shown in Tables 10 to 16.


(Evaluation Criterion)





    • A: The bacterial count decreases to less than 10% of the bacterial count of the control group.

    • B: The bacterial count decreases to 10% or more and less than 50% of the bacterial count of the control group.

    • C: The bacterial count decreases to 50% or more and less than 100% of the bacterial count of control group.

    • D: The bacterial count is the same as the bacterial count of the control group.














TABLE 9





Lactic acid

Species culture


bacteria
Species name
collection ID







A

Lactobacillus
rennini

DSM 20253


B

Lactobacillus
rennini

DSM 17732


C

Lactobacillus
acidipiscis

NBRC 102163


D

Lactobacillus
acidipiscis

NBRC 102164
















TABLE 10







Soy sauce; Lactic acid bacteria A









Salt
Alcohol



concentration
concentration
Licoricidin concentration (ppm)













(%(w/v))
(%(v/v))
1
5
10
25
50
















0
0
D
B
B
A
A



5
C
B
B
A
A



10
C
C
C
A
A


4
0
B
A
A
A
A



5
C
A
A
A
A



10
A
A
A
A
A


8
0
C
A
A
A
A



5
B
A
A
A
A


12
0
D
A
A
A
A



5
A
A
A
A
A





In soy sauce at a salt concentration of 8% (w/v) or more and an alcohol concentration of 10% (w/v) in control groups, bacteria did not grow. If the Licoricidin concentration was 0.1 ppm, the antimicrobial activity was not found under all the test conditions.













TABLE 11







Soy sauce; Lactic acid bacteria B









Salt
Alcohol



concentration
concentration
Licoricidin concentration (ppm)













(%(w/v))
(%(v/v))
1
5
10
25
50
















0
0
B
B
B
A
A


4
0
B
A
A
A
A


8
0
C
A
A
A
A


12
0
A
A
A
A
A
















TABLE 12







Soy sauce; Lactic acid bacteria C









Salt
Alcohol



concentration
concentration
Licoricidin concentration (ppm)













(%(w/v))
(%(v/v))
1
5
10
25
50
















0
0
C
C
B
A
A


4
0
C
A
A
A
A


8
0
D
A
A
A
A


12
0
B
A
A
A
A
















TABLE 13







Soy sauce; Lactic acid bacteria D









Salt
Alcohol



concentration
concentration
Licoricidin concentration (ppm)













(%(w/v))
(%(v/v))
1
5
10
25
50
















0
0
C
C
B
A
A


4
0
D
A
A
A
A


8
0
C
A
A
A
A


12
0
D
A
A
A
A
















TABLE 14







Bonito stock










Lactic acid
Licoricidin concentration (ppm)














bacteria
1
5
10
25
50







A
C
A
A
A
A



B
C
A
A
A
A



C
C
A
A
A
A



D
A
A
A
A
A

















TABLE 15







Sauce










Lactic acid
Licoricidin concentration (ppm)














bacteria
1
5
10
25
50







A
D
D
A
A
A



B
D
A
A
A
A



C
B
B
A
A
A



D
C
C
A
A
A

















TABLE 16







Japanese seasoned soup stock










Lactic acid
Licoricidin concentration (ppm)














bacteria
1
5
10
25
50







A
D
B
A
A
A



B
C
A
A
A
A



C
D
A
A
A
A



D
D
A
A
A
A










It was confirmed that licoricidin exhibited antimicrobial activity to various lactic acid bacteria under the conditions of various salt concentration and various alcohol concentrations.


Test Example 5: Antimicrobial Action of Licoricidin on Lactic Acid Bacteria in Liquid Seasoning (2)
(Production of Soy Sauce)

Commercially available whole soybean soy sauce (produced by Kikkoman Corporation) was electrodialyzed and then concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain soy sauce at a salt concentration of 0% (w/v) and an alcohol concentration of 0% (v/v). Then, salt and/or alcohol was added to the above-mentioned obtained soy sauce, and hydrochloric acid or an aqueous sodium hydroxide solution was then added to adjust the pH to a desired pH. Germfree purified water was added, and the mixture was then heat-treated to produce soy sauce at the salt concentration, the alcohol concentration, and the pH shown in the following Table 17.


(Evaluation of Antimicrobial Action)

Licoricidin (produced by ChemFaces) was added to each of the obtained soy sauces to concentrations of 1 ppm, 5 ppm, 10 ppm, 25 ppm, and 50 ppm. Lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus rennini (DSM 20253)) were then added to 106 to 107 cells/mL and cultured at 30° C. for 7 days. After the culture, the number of lactic acid bacteria was measured using the GAM agar medium “Nissui”. Soy sauce to which licoricidin was not added was used as a control group, and the antimicrobial activity was evaluated in comparison with the number of lactic acid bacteria in the control group. The evaluation was performed using the same criterion as in Test Example 4. The results are shown in Tables 18 and 19.











TABLE 17





Salt
Alcohol



concentration
concentration


(%(w/v))
(%(v/v))
pH







0
0
4.2, 4.6, 5.0, 5.4, 5.8



5
4.2, 4.6, 5.0, 5.4, 5.8


4
0
4.2, 4.6, 5.0, 5.4, 5.8



5
4.2, 4.6, 5.0, 5.4, 5.8
















TABLE 18







Salt concentration 0% (w/v)











Alcohol





concentration
Licoricidin concentration (ppm)













pH
(%(v/v))
1
5
10
25
50





4.2
0
B
B
A
A
A



5
B
A
A
A
A


4.6
0
C
B
A
A
A



5
C
A
A
A
A


5.0
0
D
B
B
A
A



5
C
B
B
A
A


5.4
0
D
D
C
C
C



5
B
A
A
A
A


5.8
0
D
D
D
D
D



5
B
A
A
A
A
















TABLE 19







Salt concentration 4% (w/v)











Alcohol





concentration
Licoricidin concentration (ppm)













ph
(%(v/v))
1
5
10
25
50





4.2
0
B
A
A
A
A



5
C
A
A
A
A


4.6
0
D
D
A
A
A



5
B
A
A
A
A


5.0
0
B
A
A
A
A



5
C
A
A
A
A


5.4
0
B
A
A
A
A



5
C
A
A
A
A


5.8
0
D
A
A
A
A



5
D
D
A
A
A









Test Example 6: Antimicrobial Action of Oxygen-Containing Heterocyclic Compounds on Lactic Acid Bacteria in Liquid Seasoning (1)
(Production of Soy Sauce)

Commercially available whole soybean soy sauce (produced by Kikkoman Corporation) was electrodialyzed and then concentrated under reduced pressure to produce soy sauce at a salt concentration of 0% (w/v) and an alcohol concentration of 0% (v/v). Then, salt and/or alcohol was added to the above-mentioned obtained soy sauce, and the mixture was then heat-treated to produce soy sauce at a salt concentration of 4% (w/v) and an alcohol concentration of 5% (v/v).


(Evaluation of Antimicrobial Action)

The test substance described in Table 20 was added to the above-mentioned produced soy sauce to concentrations of 1 to 100 ppm. Lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus rennini (DSM 20253)) were then added to 106 to 107 cells/mL and cultured at 30° C. for 7 days. After the culture, the number of lactic acid bacteria was measured using the GAM agar medium “Nissui”. Soy sauce to which licoricidin was not added was used as a control group, and the antimicrobial activity was evaluated in comparison with the number of lactic acid bacteria in the control group. The evaluation was performed using the criterion shown below. The results are shown in Table 20.


(Evaluation Criterion)





    • A: The bacterial count decreases to less than 10% of the bacterial count of the control group.

    • B: The bacterial count decreases to 10% or more and less than 50% of the bacterial count of control group.

    • C: The bacterial count decreases to 50% or more and less than 100% of the bacterial count of the control group.

    • D: The bacterial count is the same as the bacterial count of the control group.

    • -: Not evaluated













TABLE 20







Test substance
Test substance concentration (ppm)













(manufacturer)
1
5
10
25
50
100





Licoricidin
D
A
A
A
A



(ChemFaces)


Gancaonin I
C
A
A
A
A
A


(ChemFaces)


8-(γ,γ-dimethylallyl)-wighteone
C
A
A
A
A
A


(ALB Technology Limited)


Glycycoumarin
D
B
B
A
A
A


(ChemFaces)


Glyasperin C
B
B
B
A
A
A


(ChemFaces)


Glycyrin
D
B
B
A
A
A


(ChemFaces)


Isoangustone A
B
A
A
A
A
A


(ChemFaces)


Licoarylcoumarin
D
C
C
B
B
A


(ChemFaces)









It was confirmed that the oxygen-containing heterocyclic compounds other than licoricidin had antimicrobial activity, as with licoricidin.


Test Example 7: Antimicrobial Action of Oxygen-Containing Heterocyclic Compounds on Lactic Acid Bacteria in Liquid Seasoning (2)
(Evaluation of Antimicrobial Action)

The test substance described in Table 21 was added to the soy sauce produced in Test Example 6 to concentrations of 0.1 ppm, 0.5 ppm, 1 ppm, 5 ppm, 25 ppm, and 50 ppm. Lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus fructivores (NBRC 13954)) were then added to 104 to 105 cells/mL and cultured at 30° C. for 7 days. After the culture, the number of lactic acid bacteria was measured using Difco Lactobacilli MRS Agar. Soy sauce to which the test substance was not added was used as a control group, and the antimicrobial activity was evaluated in comparison with the number of lactic acid bacteria in the control group. The evaluation was performed using the following criterion. The results are shown in Table 21.


(Evaluation Criterion)





    • A: The bacterial count decreases to less than 10% of the bacterial count of a control group.

    • B: The bacterial count decreases to 10% or more and less than 50% of the bacterial count of the control group.

    • C: The bacterial count decreases to 50% or more and less than 100% of the bacterial count of the control group.

    • D: The bacterial count is the same as the bacterial count of the control group.













TABLE 21







Test substance
Test substance concentration (ppm)













(manufacturer)
0.1
0.5
1
5
25
50





Licoricidin
B
B
B
B
A
A


(ChemFaces)


Gancaonin I
B
C
B
C
B
A


(ChemFaces)


8-(γ,γ-dimethylallyl)-wighteone
B
B
B
A
A
A


(ALB Technology Limited)


Glycycoumarin
B
B
B
B
A
A


(ChemFaces)


Glyasperin C
B
B
B
B
B
A


(ChemFaces)


Glycyrin
B
B
B
B
B
B


(ChemFaces)


Isoangustone A
B
B
C
B
A
A


(ChemFaces)


Licoarylcoumarin
B
B
B
C
B
B


(ChemFaces)









It was confirmed that the oxygen-containing heterocyclic compounds other than licoricidin had antimicrobial activity, as with licoricidin.


Test Example 8: Antimicrobial Action of Licoricidin on Flat Sour Bacteria in Liquid Seasoning
(Production of Japanese Seasoned Soup Stock)

Japanese seasoned soup stock was produced by using materials shown in the following Table 22. Specifically, components contained in dried bonito was extracted with water; Koikuchi soy sauce (produced by Kikkoman Corporation), sugar, and salt were blended with the obtained extract; and the resulting mixture was heated to produce Japanese seasoned soup stock. The salt concentration of the obtained Japanese seasoned soup stock was 3% (w/v), the alcohol concentration was 0.4% (v/v), and the pH was 5.2.












TABLE 22







Ingredient
Amount blended




















Koikuchi soy sauce
105
mL



Dried bonito
31.3
g



Sugar
40
g



Salt
13.6
g



Water
888
mL



Total
1000
mL










(Evaluation of Antimicrobial Action)


Licoricidin (produced by ChemFaces) was added to the produced Japanese seasoned soup stock to concentrations of 1 ppm, 5 ppm, 10 ppm, 25 ppm, and 50 ppm. Flat sour bacteria (Bacillus coagulans (IFO12714)) were then added to 104 to 105 cells/mL and cultured at 45° C. for 7 days. Japanese seasoned soup stock to which licoricidin was not added was used as a control, and the antimicrobial activity was evaluated by comparing the pHs. The evaluation was performed using the following criterion. The results are shown in Table 23.


(Evaluation Criterion)





    • A: There is no change in pH as compared with the control.

    • B: The pH decreases as compared with the control.


















TABLE 23





Licoricidin (ChemFaces)
0







(ppm)
(Control)
1
5
10
25
50







pH
4.1
4.1
4.1
5.3
5.3
5.2


Evaluation

B
B
A
A
A









It was confirmed that licoricidin exhibited antimicrobial activity to flat sour bacteria.


Test Example 9: Antimicrobial Action of Licoricidin on Lactic Acid Bacteria in Liquid Seasonings and Food (3)
(1) Production of Liquid Seasonings and Food
(Production of Liquid Dressing)

Liquid dressing was produced by using materials shown in the following Table 24. Specifically, Koikuchi soy sauce (produced by Kikkoman Corporation), table vinegar, mirin, granulated sugar, kelp stock, and water were blended in amounts shown in the following Table 24, and the resulting mixture was heated to produce liquid dressing. The salt concentration of the obtained liquid dressing was 2.6% (w/v), the alcohol concentration was 0.8% (v/v), the pH was 4.2.












TABLE 24







Ingredient
Amount blended (g)



















Koikuchi soy sauce
18.72



Table vinegar
2.54



Mirin
2.9



Granulated sugar
5



Kelp stock
16



Water
54.84



Total
100










(Production of Lightly-Pickled Vegetables)


Seasoning liquid for lightly-pickled vegetables were produced by using materials shown in the following Table 25. Specifically, Usukuchi soy sauce (produced by Kikkoman Corporation), table vinegar, corn syrup, isomerized sugar, salt, granulated sugar, sodium glutamate (MSG), lemon fruit juice, kelp stock, and water were blended in amounts shown in the following Table 25, and the mixture was heated to produce seasoning liquid for lightly-pickled vegetables. Chinese cabbages were fully soaked therein to produce lightly-pickled vegetables. The salt concentration of the obtained seasoning liquid for lightly-pickled vegetables was 3.1% (w/v), the alcohol concentration was 0.01% (v/v), and the pH was 4.4.












TABLE 25







Ingredient
Amount blended




















Usukuchi soy sauce
0.3
mL



Table vinegar
0.5
mL



Corn syrup
15
g



Isomerized sugar
2
g



Salt
3
g



Granulated sugar
4
g



MSG
0.4
g



Lemon fruit juice
0.68
g



Kelp stock
3.2
mL



Water
83.45
mL



Total
100
mL










(Production of Cooking Vinegar)


Cooking vinegar was produced by using materials shown in the following Table 26. Specifically, table vinegar, salt, granulated sugar, lemon fruit juice, sodium glutamate (MSG), and water in amounts shown in following Table 26 were blended, and the mixture was heated to produce cooking vinegar. The salt concentration of the obtained cooking vinegar was 1.5% (w/v), the alcohol concentration was 0% (v/v), and the pH was 3.8.












TABLE 26







Ingredient
Amount blended




















Table vinegar
0.1
mL



Salt
1.5
g



Granulated sugar
10
g



Lemon fruit juice
5.1
g



MSG
0.4
g



Water
87.3
mL



Total
100
mL










(2) Evaluation of Antimicrobial Action

Licoricidin (produced by ChemFaces) was added to each of the above-mentioned produced liquid dressing, lightly-pickled vegetables, and cooking vinegar to concentrations of 1 ppm, 5 ppm, 10 ppm, 25 ppm, and 50 ppm. Lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus rennini (DSM 20253)) were then added to 106 to 107 cells/mL. The bacteria were cultured in the liquid dressing and the lightly-pickled vegetables at 30° C. for 7 days, and the bacteria were cultured in the cooking vinegar at 30° C. for 3 days. After the culture, the number of lactic acid bacteria was measured using the GAM agar medium “Nissui”. The liquid dressing, the lightly-pickled vegetables, and the cooking vinegar to which licoricidin was not added were used as respective control groups, and the antimicrobial activity was evaluated in comparison with the number of lactic acid bacteria in the control group. The evaluation was performed using the same criterion as in Test Example 4. The results are shown in Table 27.


(Evaluation Criterion)





    • A: The bacterial count decreases to less than 10% of the bacterial count of the control group.

    • B: The bacterial count decreases to 10% or more and less than 50% of the bacterial count of the control group.

    • C: The bacterial count decreases to 50% or more and less than 100% of the bacterial count of control group.

    • D: The bacterial count is the same as the bacterial count of the control group.














TABLE 27









Licoricidin concentration (ppm)












Evaluation sample
1
5
10
25
50





Liquid dressing
A
A
A
A
A


Lightly-pickled vegetables
B
C
A
A
A


Cooking vinegar
A
A
A
A
A









It was confirmed that licoricidin exhibited antimicrobial activity to lactic acid bacteria in the various liquid seasonings and the food.

Claims
  • 1. A food/beverage article comprising: one or more compounds represented by formula (I):
  • 2. The food/beverage article according to claim 1, wherein the compound is at least one selected from the group consisting of licoricidin, gancaonin I, 8-(γ,γ-dimethylallyl)-wighteone, glycycoumarin, glyasperin C, glycyrin, isoangustone A, and licoarylcoumarin.
  • 3. The food/beverage article according to claim 1, wherein the food/beverage article is liquid seasoning or food.
  • 4. The food/beverage article according to claim 3, wherein the liquid seasoning is soy sauce, soup stock, Japanese seasoned soup stock, sauce, dressing, or cooking vinegar, and the food is lightly-pickled vegetables.
  • 5-6. (canceled)
  • 7. A method for suppressing proliferation of lactic acid bacteria and/or flat sour bacteria in a food/beverage article, comprising: adjusting a total of concentrations of compounds represented by formula (I) in the food/beverage article to 1 ppm or more:
  • 8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the compound is licoricidin, gancaonin I, 8-(γ,γ-dimethylallyl)-wighteone, glycycoumarin, glyasperin C, glycyrin, isoangustone A, or licoarylcoumarin.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2020-135109 Aug 2020 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2021/028606 8/2/2021 WO