The present invention pertains to a foot elevating rest or cushion that elevates a user's feet while resting. In a preferred embodiment, the cushion is formed by a configured foam body and is suited for use both while a user is sleeping or while resting awake such as while watching TV or reading. A preferred embodiment also is designed for accommodating either a crossed leg arrangement or a non-cross legged arrangement.
The benefits associated with elevating a person's feet include improved blood flow to desired areas. Elevating a person's feet above the level of the heart or upper body can be therapeutic in helping to decrease inflammation and swelling in the leg, foot and/or ankle region. For example, the often referenced “RICE” treatment for sprained ankles involves rest, ice, compression and elevation. Foot elevation is also a standard instruction following foot surgery and the like to reduce swelling and decrease the pain level. Foot and ankle swelling due to fluid build up is also common during pregnancy and foot elevation is often recommended. Back pain sufferers also often find relief by elevating their feet/legs with an appropriate support.
Even without an injury or swelling, individuals often find it more comfortable to have their feet elevated when lying on their back.
A variety of support pads and cushions have been advanced in the art in an effort to provide for leg elevation. A remote control variable height foot rest can be seen in U.S. Pat. No. 6,349,438 which features hydraulic members to vary the height. Of course, there is a high expense associated with a system of this type and its usage location is restricted. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,097,533; 5,173,979 and 5,497,520 illustrate examples of leg elevation support cushions that are designed with an emphasis on supporting a bent knee in conjunction with the feet, and thus tend to be large and bulky and therefore obstructive. In addition, many of these prior art cushions fail to provide a high degree of comfort and/or proper leg positioning or maintenance.
The present invention is directed at providing a high comfort cushion which provides for foot elevational and proper leg/foot positioning relative to the cushion for a variety of user positions. The present invention is also designed to maintain a high comfort level and proper leg/foot positioning for a variety of leg/foot placements commonly used by a person including a supine position (on the back) lying position. This includes both crossed legs and non-crossed legs where the legs are separated apart in the ankle region to some extent. The enhancement in leg/foot placement is facilitated by dimensioned cavities or recesses in the supporting surface which are designed to comfortably support and retain the portion of the body received therein. This includes, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, a pair of recesses that are dimensioned widthwise and depth wise to comfortably accommodate the user's leg(s). The cushion's depth is preferably designed to support a portion of the leg extending (in the lengthwise direction) between the ankle/heel border region (e.g., the lower end of the Achilles) and the lower end/border region of the calf (e.g., the fleshy mass formed chiefly by the gastrocnemius muscle at the back of the leg ( below the knee)). In the widthwise direction the side width of recesses formed in the upper surface of the main body of the cushion are designed to receive the leg (or legs if the cross leg arrangement is involved) comfortably (e.g., with contact on the side walls and some degree of compression of the receiving material but far removed from a bottomed out state). This sizing can be based on a universal for all (adult and child) setting, or a universal for adult in use with a universal child size, or a series of different sizes (e.g. 3 to 7) designed for various dimensioned legs.
The present invention is also designed to elevate a person's legs to facilitate blood flow in desired areas of the body while avoiding too high a positioning which can lead to discomfort.
As explained in greater detail below, relative to size, the height of the contoured surface from the support surface is designed to provide a leg support level conducive to good blood flow conditions while maintaining a high comfort level.
In a preferred embodiment, a foam block (e.g. a molded body having the final desired configuration or a block that is subject to a contour process to form the desired resultant contoured body shape) such as of a polyurethane foam material is utilized. The foam relied upon is designed to provide a high degree of comfort while still achieving the desired level of support (preferably without bottoming out) at the desired height elevation off the underlying supporting surface (e.g. a coach or bed or floor). To facilitate a discussion of the preferred characteristics of the foam material of the present invention reference is made to the following preferred summaries of some quantitative values associated with foam material—
Relative to preferred embodiments of the present invention, Table 1 below provides some illustrative preferred characteristics for the foam material used in forming the below described contoured foam cushion which is preferably a High Resilience foam, Visco-elastic, or Conventional foam (e.g., Omalan® foam of Carpenter Co.)
The cushioning device of the present invention is preferably designed to provide a proper level of support to a region of the leg extending from the interior of the heel to the closest end of the calf muscle. That is, in a preferred embodiment, the cushioning device (e.g. the upper leg contact region) has a depth D.
For an average adult, the distance between the lower end of the calf muscle and the interior of the heel is 8 inches (20.3 cm) (hereafter preferred leg contact region L). In a preferred embodiment, cushion depth D is equal to that value or within (30%) (preferably in the lesser direction as in the greater direction contact with the heel and/or calf muscle slope occurs which can lessen the comfort level). Alternate arrangements represented by the present invention include providing contact regions to the heel and/or sloping calf muscle with the majority of contact (e.g. 70% or greater being relative to the noted preferred leg contact region L). The preferred leg contact arrangement thus has the heel unsupported by the upper contact surface and overhanging with preferably some back wall contact relative to the upper interior region of the heel overhang. This overhang relationship is illustrated in FIG. 6 and discussed in greater detail below.
As shown in
Recesses 24 and 26 are spaced apart along the total width of the front face 28 of cushion 20 so as to provide for individual leg support, with the legs spread apart in a comfortable (natural) lying on back spacing. Preferably grooves or contours 24 and 26 are arranged parallel to one another. In view of the contouring nature of the cushioning material recesses, this parallel orientation can accommodate an acute angle leg relationship (e.g., a 5 to 30 degree angle which encompasses a typical or normal supine lying position).
In an alternate embodiment (not shown), grooves 24 and 26 are arranged in diverging fashion such as in the angle range noted above. The parallel arrangement is preferable, however, as it provides for use of either the “front” or “back” walls of cushion 20 at the heel end so as to avoid having the user have to flip the cushion around from an incorrect initial position. In a preferred embodiment, the separation distance G is from about 7 to 12 inches, with a preferred sub-range of 9 to 10 inches, being well suited for many intended uses for the present invention.
The depth d1 and d3 (or radius r1 and r3) are preferably of equal value with a range of 0.75-inches to 3-inches, sub-range 1.0-inch to 2.0-inches and value of 1.5-inches being illustrative of preferred dimensioning for the preferred invention. It should be noted that the term radius is being used in a broad sense as being the actual surface configuration or an average or approximation of, for example, a ridged or sub-level contouring (e.g. small peak/valleys, depressions, or stepped configurations). There is featured under the present invention a smooth semi-circular or approximate semi-circular arrangement (e.g. vertical side walls in the upper region followed by the concave curvature). In this latter case, depths d1 and d3 would be greater than r1 and r3 in view of the vertical walls at the upper end of the recesses.
Recesses 24 and 26 are further preferably positioned inward of end outer walls 32 and 34 of cushion 20. End projections 36 and 38 are preferably made of sufficient width (w1, w4) to maintain leg retention function (avoiding a bending out of outer walls 32 and 34 and rollout of a leg upon minor adjustments or rolling of a leg within grooves 24 and 26 by the user), while also minimizing material usage in product formation. A suitable thickness (average if any sloping in the inner and/or outer wall surface) for w1 and w4 is 0.50 to 1.50 with w1 preferably equal to w4 with 0.75 to 1.25 representing a preferred sub-range and 1 inch or 2.54 cm being a preferred value for many uses.
Cushion 20 also features a base width B which is greater than the width between the upper, exterior surface of end projections 36 and 38. Preferably base B has a length of 15 to 25, more preferably 17 to 20 and with 18 inches (45.7 cm) being an example of a suitable base length value. This provides a stable base relative to rocking or minor leg movements while the lessened width represented by (B-b) provides material usage minimization. This drop in width represented by (B-b) can be carried out in a variety of ways with
The depth of grooves 24 and 26 (r1, r2 for the illustrated embodiment) are designed in relation to the overall height H of cushion 20 to provide maximum comfort through efficient usage of the IFD properties of the utilized foam such as those set forth above in Table 1. In a preferred embodiment H is 3 to 12, with 4 to 9 being illustrated of a preferred sub-range and 5.5 inches (14 cm) an example of a height that is well suited for the intended usage of the present invention.
The ratio h1/H or h3/H is preferably ⅙ to ⅚, more preferably ⅓ to ⅔ with a ratio of 3.5/5.5 being a well suited ratio for cushion heights as set out above and are well suited for IFD values of 25 to 45. Thus, with height values H as described above, some suitable h1 and h3 values are 1.0-inch to 5.0-inches, more preferably 2.0-inches to 4.0-inches, and a common height of 3.5 for h2 and h3 is well suited for providing sufficient support relative to the above noted preferred materials.
The above noted IFD value and height relatives can be achieved with foam material such as Omalon® foam material of Carpenter Co. Also, while the present invention is preferably a monolithic body of a common material, various laminates or multi-type cushion combinations are also encompassed by the present invention such as a base block together with a laminate layer or one or more recess inserts.
As with the above noted, visco-elastic foam material can be utilized for the upper layer 38 or for the pocket inserts 25, 27, and 29. A visco-elastic foam is also made by Carpenter Co. of Richmond, Va. under the trademark VISCOLUX foam and CONFORM foam. Visco-elastic foam is a high density, visco-elastic, open-cell material. The open-cells are generally spherical with windows and are temperature and weight sensitive (becoming softer upon being heated such as by body heat). When a visco-elastic material is utilized as a laminate or insert under the present invention, the preferred density range is 16 to 120 kg/m3, more preferably 16-95 kg/m3, with 30-60 kg/m3 and 40-45 kg/m3 being preferred sub-ranges. A hardness ranging from 25 to 90N at 25% compression at 20° C. represents a preferred hardness range with 30 to 40N being a preferred sub-range and 35N a preferred value therein. It is also noted that a preferred hardness range of 10N to 60N is applicable at 65% compression at 20° C.
If a polyurethane foam (as the base support—and/or upper laminate or inserts) (a density 25 to 50 kg/m3 and hardness range of 10 lbs to 30 lbs) is suitable for both “conventional” and high resiliency materials including densified polyurethane foam such as Omalan® or Hypersoft® foam of Carpenter Co. or high-resiliency foam such as QUALATEX® foam of Carpenter Co.
In
In a preferred embodiment, groove 40 is in an intermediate position relative to groove 24 and 26 although other arrangements such as the crossed leg groove being provided at one end of cushion 20 to one side of individual leg grooves 24 and 26, are featured under the present invention.
In addition to groove 40 preferably being centered relative to grooves 24 and 26, it is also preferably centrally positioned relative to the upper portion of opposite far end walls 32 and 34 (with grooves 24 and 26 being preferably equally inwardly spaced from those end walls and equally spaced from the intermediate groove 40).
The height values for h1 and h2 are designed to lift the leg of a user at an angle of about 5 to 40° (e.g. sine of σ shown in
Also, while the cushion 20 of the present invention is shown with a horizontal upper contact surface, a pre-fabricated upper slope (calf to heel direction) of 0 to 20° is also encompassed with the present invention. A horizontal upper contact surface is preferred as for most type of cushion material the leg slope can be accommodated by the compression accommodate range of the cushion material and it facilitates some of the possible manufacturing techniques.
A variety of manufacturing techniques can be utilized to form cushion 20 including contour cutting (e.g., moving wire blades, roller with knife, heated cutting blades, etc.) or through a molding technique such as where foam precursor chemicals or expandable particles is/are injected into, for example, a two part mold container.
Also,
While the invention has been described in detail with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made, and equivalents employed, without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
621098 | Kelly | Mar 1899 | A |
2375225 | Herbert | May 1945 | A |
2448427 | Gordon | Aug 1948 | A |
2465781 | Banta | Mar 1949 | A |
2522120 | Kaskey et al. | Sep 1950 | A |
2700779 | Tolkowsky | Feb 1955 | A |
2748838 | Scholl | Jun 1956 | A |
2839766 | Hull | Jun 1958 | A |
2878493 | Delia | Mar 1959 | A |
3124812 | Milton et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
3162486 | Emery | Dec 1964 | A |
3234623 | Rector | Feb 1966 | A |
3308489 | Winkler | Mar 1967 | A |
3345654 | Noble | Oct 1967 | A |
3482566 | Watkins | Dec 1969 | A |
3505994 | Smith | Apr 1970 | A |
3604023 | Lynch | Sep 1971 | A |
4090268 | Turner | May 1978 | A |
4270235 | Gutmann | Jun 1981 | A |
4371985 | Pokhis | Feb 1983 | A |
4392489 | Wagner, Sr. | Jul 1983 | A |
4475542 | Brossard | Oct 1984 | A |
4584730 | Rajan | Apr 1986 | A |
4736477 | Moore | Apr 1988 | A |
4805605 | Glassman | Feb 1989 | A |
4910818 | Grabill et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
D319751 | Hoff | Sep 1991 | S |
D321562 | Ljungvall | Nov 1991 | S |
5097553 | Boland | Mar 1992 | A |
5125123 | Engle | Jun 1992 | A |
5173979 | Nennhaus | Dec 1992 | A |
5442823 | Siekman et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454993 | Kostich | Oct 1995 | A |
5497520 | Kunz et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5603336 | Shepich | Feb 1997 | A |
5745939 | Flick et al. | May 1998 | A |
6065166 | Sharrock et al. | May 2000 | A |
6182314 | Frydman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6349438 | Coleman et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6564407 | Luu et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6640368 | Roston | Nov 2003 | B2 |
20010032365 | Sramek | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020088057 | Wassilefsky | Jul 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040070254 A1 | Apr 2004 | US |