Patent Grant
10827798
The present invention relates to footwear, including sneakers, shoes, socks, and hosiery, and more specifically to footwear configured to improve support of the user's foot and foot arch(es). The present invention also relates to devices used to increase foot comfort when footwear is worn. The present invention further relates to footwear configured to improve and assist with walking and/or running.
Conventional footwear (e.g., shoes and sneakers) comprises a sole and an upper secured to the sole on a lower portion of the upper. The top of the upper includes an opening, typically near the back part of the upper, where the foot enters the cavity formed by the upper and the sole. The entire structure functions to support the foot. The sole is the portion between the foot and the ground. The sole is intended to provide traction, support and cushioning for the user. Many soles have a multi-part construction including an outsole, a midsole, and an insole. The insole is located on the upper most portion of the sole, typically with an upper surface exposed inside the footwear where the user's foot contacts the sole. The outsole is located on the bottom most portion of the sole of the footwear. The underside of the outsole contacts the surface on which the user walks or runs (the bottom of the sole contacts the ground and provides traction against the surface on which the user walks) and is designed for durability and traction. The midsole is located between the insole and the outsole and it is commonly designed to absorb the forces commonly encountered when walking or running in the footwear. One or more parts of the sole, including each the insole, midsole, and outsole, may include padding/cushioning and/or be made of materials that create cushioning for comfort and for shock absorption properties.
For most footwear the sole also includes a passive medial arch support. The passive medial arch support is a raised part/portion of the sole positioned in the location where the medial arch of the user's foot rests on the insole. In most footwear, the passive medial arch support is located on the medial side (inside) of the footwear in a lateral direction and about midway between the front and the back of the footwear in a longitudinal direction. Passive medial arch supports are typically convex in at least two directions to complement and conform to the shape of the user's medial foot arch. To achieve the shape of the passive medial arch support, the sole of the footwear can be shaped to form the passive medial arch support and/or the footwear can include padding/cushioning as part of the sole (typically the insole) to create the passive medial arch support. The flexibility of the passive arch support cushion and its ability to compress when the foot's medial arch contacts the passive arch support cushion allows, to some extent, for use by people with different arch heights, widths and shapes, although not every user's medial arch is comfortably supported by the standard passive arch supports inside footwear. Accordingly, it is not uncommon for users to add to the passive medial arch support inside footwear with inserts or to modify the passive arch support and/or the insole shape using orthotics for improved comfort.
With the foot inside the footwear, the foot rests on top of the insole and contacts at least some parts of the inside of the upper. For footwear having a passive medial arch support, the medial arch of the user's foot rests upon the passive medial arch support causing upward forces on the user's medial arch when weight is applied onto the footwear.
There are many different types of soles. Some footwear uses a very rigid sole intended to provide resistance to penetration, such as, for example, steel plated construction boots/shoes. Some footwear includes a less rigid sole which provides rigidity but with also provides some flexibility, such as, for example, in athletic footwear with spikes (e.g., soccer shoes, baseball spikes/cleats, football cleats, etc.). Still further there is footwear with a strong and durable sole which provides some flexibility but also provides a different appearance more appealing for formal use, the sole intended to last for an extended period of time, such as, for example, dress shoes. Footwear also exists with a light and flexible sole intended to provide comfort and improve balance, typically when exercising but also during daily use (walking), such as, for example, sneakers and running sneakers. Sneaker soles are typically made for motion during use and include padding to absorb impact forces associated with foot strike.
Some footwear has a split sole design with a front sole portion/section and a back sole portion/section, without a middle sole portion/section. In split sole footwear, the front sole portion/section and the back sole portion/section are connected to each other using the upper. Split sole footwear also often includes a heel pad and a toe pad made from a rough material, such as leather or suede, to offer traction. The middle section of the split sole footwear (sometimes both over and under the foot) is covered and protected only by the material used for the upper. Split sole footwear usually provides less arch support to the user (along the user's medial arch as well as the lateral arch) than full sole footwear and thus those arches of the foot may be vulnerable to injury during use. An advantage of split sole footwear is that it may provide more traction in certain environments, such as, for example, for rock climbing where the split sole allows for greater flexibility of the footwear which assists with contact with uneven or rocky terrain. As another example, hunters may use split sole footwear for quieter movement than full sole footwear. In addition, split sole shoes are considered aesthetically pleasing, especially in the dance industry, because they make the line of the foot appear more flattering. A split sole shoe is particularly useful for dancers who need to bend their foot and/or point their toes, such as, for example, in ballet. Such footwear, however, does not provide support for the foot, particularly in the midsection where there is no sole.
Still further, there is footwear designed to improve/assist the user with walking/running through the use of mechanical devices located in the footwear. For example, some footwear includes one or more springs within the sole, typically located in the heel region, to create lift during a push off phase (of the Gait Cycle) or when jumping. Other footwear includes encapsulated air pockets within the sole, also typically in the back portion of the sole to create increased cushioning. Mechanical devices such as springs or air pockets in the sole provide shock absorption properties that relieve some of the stress and fatigue of walking or running.
Some recent footwear marketed for running includes channels or grooves in the outsole to increase outsole flexibility between the forefoot section and the heel section of the sole, such as, for example in the Nike® Free 3.0 Flyknit. The segmented sole may benefit the user by strengthening the muscles in the foot. The outsole is made of lightweight material to try to give the feeling of running barefoot while still giving a cushioned support to the user's foot. Some segmented outsoles are also configured with a ratio of the heel-to-toe height smaller than in a traditional sneaker or running shoe to encourage forefoot strike as opposed to a heel strike when running.
Many runners, especially those who wear traditional running shoes, strike the ground heel first while running. Due to this reason, traditional running shoes usually have added height and cushion in the midsole and outsole of the heel portion of the shoe, causing a larger heel-to-toe height ratio. The added cushioning seeks to provide comfort to runners by reducing the impact of the heel strike phase on the foot and skeletal system. In heel striking, as understood in the context of the gait cycle (the conventional six phases/steps of the gait cycle are 1) heel strike, 2) foot flat, 3) mid-stance, 4) heel-off, 5) toe-off, and 6) swing) the collision of the heel on the ground generates a significant impact force on the skeletal system, whereas in forefoot striking, the collision of the forefoot with the ground causes less effect on the skeletal system.
Applicant has discovered that the existing footwear impedes the natural shock absorptive and cushioning capabilities of the human foot. Existing footwear with passive arch support(s) limits the foot's natural ability to achieve superior arch compression of the foot structure (including bones, muscles and ligaments) which provides shock absorption and cushioning for the user's foot and body. Similarly, the structure of existing footwear with passive arch support(s) limits the energy absorbing and dissipation characteristics of the foot. In addition, most existing footwear causes splaying of the foot along at least one of the medial arch, the lateral arch and the transverse arch, which causes discomfort for some including the feeling of a tight shoe or sneaker.
Throughout the gait cycle, the arches of the foot experience fluctuation of compressive forces due to the different placement of body weight forces at each stage and the reaction of the foot's biomechanics. Spacing and the shapes of the bones in the human foot enable the human foot to achieve two different types of compression of the bones depending on the position of the foot and the direction of the forces.
As used herein, the phrase “inferior compression” refers to the state of the human foot when compressive forces are applied along inside arch(es) of the foot causing the parts of the bones of the foot along the inside of the arch(es) to touch together.
As used herein, the phrase “superior compression” refers to the state of the human foot when compressive forces are applied along the outside arch(es) of the foot causing the parts of the bones of the foot along the outside of the arch(es) to touch together.
A passive medial arch support such as the arch pads commonly found inside footwear, provides a filler of arch concavity. It supports the medial longitudinal arch of the user during weight bearing (at the flat foot stage of the gait cycle) when walking and/or running keeping the foot arch structure in a middle position (between a state of inferior compression and a state of superior compression) and thus not rigid. The uncompressed position hinders normal foot biomechanics of arches splaying. Since ground forces dissipate through the passive arch support, force fluctuation is restricted, there are no arch compressive forces either inferior or superior and thus the natural arch neutralizing and shock absorption properties of the foot are diminished. Passive arch supports also have a long term deleterious effect on the foot; they passively hold the foot as if in a cast sometimes causing osteoporosis, muscle and ligaments atrophy, with a loss of ligament integrity which maintains the architectural structure of the foot. Consequently, when walking barefoot without a passive arch support after experiencing these deleterious effects, the foot effectively “Hyper-Splays” due to the loss of ligament integrity without achieving arch rigidity (Flat Foot) and is weak and unstable.
None of the existing footwear is capable of providing a user with a dynamic arch support system that increases the users' medial arch rigidity when the user pushes down on the insole (e.g., during the flat foot and mid-stance stages of the gait cycle), an arch support system that increases footwear comfort and also provides assistance with walking and/or running through propulsion. None of the existing footwear lessens the splaying of the user's foot along the medial longitudinal arch and/or the transverse arch for increased comfort. None of the existing footwear increases the rigidity of the arch support(s) when loading to help achieve an inferior compression of the user's foot (as opposed to superior arch compression which occurs during arch splaying) creating improved shock absorption and cushioning effects. None of the exiting footwear provides a convex shaped outsole with opposing wedge shaped configurations in the bottom of the forefoot sole section and the heel sole section which provide rotation of the forefoot sole section and the heel sole section in opposite directions when weight is applied.
None of the exiting footwear provides a convex shaped, split sole (in the longitudinal direction) with an outsole having opposing wedge shaped configurations in the bottom of the forefoot sole section and the heel sole section that provide rotation of the forefoot sole section and the heel sole section in opposite directions when weight is applied.
None of the exiting footwear provides a convex shaped outsole transversely across the width of the footwear in the forefoot section with opposing wedge shaped configurations which provide rotation of the medial side and the lateral side of the forefoot sole section in opposite directions when weight is applied.
None of the exiting footwear provides a convex shaped outsole transversely across the width of the footwear with a split sole and with opposing wedge shaped configurations in the forefoot sole section which provide rotation of the medial side and the lateral side of the forefoot sole section in opposite directions when weight is applied.
None of the exiting footwear provides a flexible, elastic, member between the forefoot sole section and the heel sole section configured to increase cushioning effects, store and dissipate energy thereby assisting with propulsion, and which increases foot comfort by reducing splaying. None of the existing footwear provides a split sole with a flexible, elastic, member between the forefoot sole section and the heel sole section configured to increase cushioning effects, store and dissipate energy thereby assisting with propulsion, and which increases foot comfort by reducing splaying.
None of the existing footwear provides a flexible, elastic, member transversely positioned in the forefoot sole to increase cushioning effects and comfort by reducing splaying. None of the exiting footwear provides a split sole with flexible, elastic, members positioned longitudinally and transversely in the forefoot sole section to increase cushioning effects and comfort by reducing splaying.
No existing footwear provides a dynamic arch support comprising an elastic member connected at opposing ends to rotatable wedges which, when force is applied on the wedges, causes the wedges to rotate and in some cases slide thereby bending the elastic member, increasing the energy stored in the elastic member, and creating arch support.
No existing footwear includes at least one pair of rotatable wedges positioned in a location in the footwear such that they are along at least one of the medial arch, the lateral arch, and the transverse arch of the user's foot when worn, wherein the wedges rotate and slide thereby reducing splaying and pronation of the user's foot.
None of existing footwear provides a mechanism to help the user's foot achieve inferior compression of the medial arch during the flat foot phase which relaxes the plantar fascia tissue due to a decrease in distance between the calcaneus and metatarsals.
None of the existing footwear provides a pad for attachment to a user's forefoot across the width of the foot using an adhesive on the top side of the pad, the bottom side of the pad having a pair of wedges positioned in opposite directions such that when the user wears the pad and weight is placed down on the pad, the sides of the foot and the pad rotate around the thicker portion of the wedges causing the transverse arch to arch, thereby reducing splaying and pronation of the user's foot.
None of the existing footwear provides a pad for attachment to a sock or hosiery item in the forefoot area across the width of the sock or hosiery item using adhesive located on the top side of the pad, the bottom side of the pad having a pair of wedges position in opposite directions such that when the user wears the pad and weight is placed down on the pad, the sides of the foot and the pad rotate around the thicker portion of the wedges causing the transverse arch to arch, thereby reducing splaying and pronation of the user's foot.
None of the existing footwear provides two pads for attachment to a sock or hosiery item, the first pad in the forefoot area across the width of the sock or hosiery item and the second in the heel area, using adhesive located on the top side of the pads, the bottom side of the first pad having a pair of wedges positioned in opposite directions such that when the user wears the pad and weight is placed down on the pad, the sides of the foot and the pad rotate around the thicker portion of the wedges causing the transverse arch to arch thereby reducing splaying and pronation of the user's foot, the second pad in the heel area the bottom side having one wedge positioned with the thicker portion closer to the middle (laterally) of the foot and the thinner portion located closer to the back of the foot such that when the user wears both the first pad and the second pad and weight is placed down on the pads, the front and back of the foot also rotate around the thicker portions of the wedges also causing the medical arch to arch.
Applicant has invented footwear with an improved arch support, footwear configured to improve comfort and to assist with walking and/or running that overcomes the foregoing and other shortcomings. Applicant has invented footwear using at least one pair of wedges on the outsole, midsole, and/or innersole which provide footwear having improved arch support, configured to improve comfort and to assist with walking and/or running. Applicant has also invented attachments to be used as part of footwear or on existing footwear, e.g., socks and hosiery, that include at least one pair of wedges which provide improved arch support and are configured to improve comfort and to assist with walking and/or running. While the invention will be described in connection with certain embodiments, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to those embodiments. To the contrary, the invention includes all alternatives, modifications and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
One embodiment of the present invention includes an article of footwear comprising an upper and a sole structure secured to the upper having a front at the toe area and a back at the heel area, a medial side and a lateral side, a longitudinal length from the front to the back and a transverse width from the medial side to the lateral side. The sole structure according to the invention comprises an outsole with a generally convex shape along the longitudinal length of the footwear when the footwear is in a non-weight bearing position having a front end region and a back end region. The front end region is located along the entire front sole region of the sole with a connecting portion in the front of the midfoot sole region. The back end region is located along the entire rear sole region of the sole with a connecting portion in the back of the midfoot sole region. There is a raised portion of the sole between the front end region and the back end region in the midfoot sole region of the footwear. Accordingly, the front end region of the outsole is curved upward toward the upper from the innermost portion in the midfoot sole region to the front of the footwear and the back end region of the outsole is curved upward toward the upper from the innermost portion in the midfoot sole region to the back of the footwear. The outsole has a place of contact defined as at the innermost portion of the front end region of the outsole and a place of contact defined as the innermost portion of the back end region of the outsole. When the footwear is worn and weight is placed down onto the sole, the front end and the back end of the outsole each bend about the respective places of contact bending in opposite directions causing the outsole of the footwear to flatten in the forefoot sole region and the rear sole region.
Preferably, the footwear according to the invention has no passive medial arch support. Preferably, the raised portion of the sole between the front end region and the back end region has no outsole or a raised outsole. In other embodiments, the raised portion of the sole between the front end region and the back end region has no midsole and/or insole.
In the embodiment shown in
The flexible and elastic member may be, for example, a metal strip/rod or a plastic strip/rod connecting the front end section and the back end section. The metal or plastic strip/rod spans across the middle section. The metal or plastic strip/rod stores energy when bent and the energy is released when the metal or plastic strip/rod flexes back to its original form/position. The invention also includes embodiments where the metal strip is removable and replaceable with a metal strip having different elasticity so that the propulsive force created by the footwear can be modified. In another embodiment, instead of a metal strip between the front end section and the back end section, both the front end section and the back end section can include magnets having similar polarity such that the magnets cause the front end section and the back end section to repel each other when they bend and the magnets move toward each other. As for the metal strip, the invention includes embodiments where the magnets are removable and replaceable with magnets having different magnetic strength.
The invention also includes embodiments where the front end section and/or the back end section of the sole is removable and replaceable with a component having a different configuration (e.g., slope and/or height) to modify the amount of arch support created by the invention. Such embodiments include devices where the sole adjustments are made in the factory during manufacturing, post-manufacture in the factory as a customization, in stores, and/or post-purchase. The invention also includes embodiments where air and/or water can be added to or removed from the sole to change its shape/configuration, including alteration of the angle(s) of inclination of the front end section and/or the back end section. The invention further includes embodiments where the spacing between the front end section and the back end section of the sole can be adjusted for a greater or smaller spacing.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the general description of the invention given above and the detailed description of an embodiment given below, serve to explain the principles of the present invention. Similar components of the devices are similarly numbered for simplicity.
Reference is being made in detail to presently preferred embodiments of the invention. Selective embodiments are provided by way of explanation of the invention, which is not intended to be limited thereto. In fact, those of ordinary skill in the art may appreciate upon reading the present specification and viewing the present drawings that various modifications and variations can be made.
The present invention is footwear with an improved arch support, footwear configured to improve comfort and to assist with walking and/or running. The invention includes footwear with a convex shaped outsole bottom along at least one of the arches (the medial arch, the lateral arch and the transverse arch of the footwear). The footwear according to the invention uses at least one pair of wedges on the outsole, or an outsole shaped and configured in such a manner, which provides for improved arch support, improved comfort, and assists with walking and/or running. The footwear according to the invention also includes midsoles and insoles with the wedge configuration(s) as well as adhesive pads and socks/hosiery with the wedges fixedly or removably attached thereto.
For a better understanding of the present invention,
In the embodiment shown in
The underside of the outsole in the front end section 210 of the footwear according to the invention is thus curved upward from the lowest location in the midfoot sole region of the footwear to the front of the footwear 120, including the portion in the front sole region. Likewise, the underside of the outsole in the rear end section 230 of the footwear according to the invention is curved upward from the lowest location in the midfoot sole region of the footwear to the rear of the footwear 124, including the portion in the rear sole region. The footwear thus has two places of contact for the outsole on the surface it is placed located in the midfoot sole region that are spaced apart from each other such that when the footwear is worn, the two places of contact will be inside the contact locations for the medial arch of a user's foot. The footwear is also configured such that when worn and weight is placed down onto the footwear and the outsole, the outsole bends about the two places of contact in opposite directions causing the outsole of the footwear to flatten in the rear sole region and in the front sole region. The footwear according to the invention preferably has no passive medial arch support that would otherwise limit the user's foot's ability to achieve inferior arch compression along the medial arch during a flat foot position. It is understood that the outsole of the footwear according to the invention in the front end section 210 of the footwear and/or in the back end section 230 of the footwear can be configured in other shapes with or without curves, such as, for example, a straight outsole sloped upward from the place of contact to the front of the sole and/or from the place of contact to the back of the sole.
The sole according to the invention is flexible preferably made from—plastic, rubber, metal, opposing magnets, leather, air pockets, etc.
As shown in
When weight is placed on the footwear, as shown in Position B, the front end section of the sole 210 of the footwear comprising the sole in the forefoot sole region and a part of the outsole located in the front of the midfoot sole region connected to the sole in the forefoot region rotates around the place of contact 135 for the front wedge 134 in a direction t. The back end section of the footwear 230 comprising the sole in the rear sole region and a part of the outsole located in the rear of the midfoot region and connected to the sole in the rear sole region rotates around the place of contact 133 for the rear wedge 132 in a direction s. The direction of rotation t of the front end of the sole 210 is about opposite to the direction of rotation s of the back end of the sole 230. The invention includes the ability for the sole to rotate (each the front end section 210 and/or the back end section 230) in the transverse direction (e.g., a twisting like pronation of the foot).
The rotation of the front and back end sections of the sole 210 and 230 in opposite directions stabilizes the outsole 119 on the ground (or another surface on which the footwear is placed). The front end section 210 and back end section 230 rotation causes the middle section of the sole in between the two 220 (within the midfoot sole region) to arch. When the footwear is worn, the weight of the user comes down on the contact locations for the medial arch which are outside of the places of contact 133 and 135. The footwear consequently shortens the base of the user's medial foot arch, raising the medial arch of the user's foot, thereby increasing the rigidity along the medial arch with inferior arch compression. The user's foot is placed into the condition it would normally be in during the heel-off windlass stage of the gait cycle (but without toe dorsiflexion and its consequence of tighter plantar fascia) with an increased arch height and decreased arch base length, and the plantar fascia tissue shortens (and it therefore loosens) instead of the foot being placed into the mid-stance stage where the user's foot is splayed with a decreased arch height and increased arch base length and with the plantar fascia tissue lengthened (stretched longitudinally). The user's foot is pushed into a state where the bones of the foot experience inferior arch compression (the same state as during the windlass effect during the heel-off stage of the gait cycle) instead of superior compression. Particularly for user's with tight footwear (shoes), with the invention, in this position, the user's foot fits more comfortably inside the footwear because it does not “spread out” (splay) as much as without the invention.
Most preferably, although not necessary, when weight is placed on the footwear causing rotation of the front end section 210 and the back end section 230, causing the shape of the underside of the outsole to change from a convex configuration to an about flat configuration (with the underside of the front end section and the underside of the back end section flat), either one or both of the front end section 210 of the outsole and the back end section 230 of the outsole also slide on the surface they contact each towards the middle of the footwear (towards each other). The combination of sliding and rotating of the front end section 210 and back end section 230 of the sole increases the bending force on the middle section 220 of the sole which in turn increases the arching action of the footwear in the middle section 220 and thus the medial arch of the user's foot. A stronger and more stable arch system is created due to the resulting forces on the base of the arch which become directed inward at the bases of the arch (at the outsole) as depicted in
The sliding of the outsole 119 along the contacting surface at the places of contact 133 and 135 may occur for typical outsole materials of construction (e.g., rubber) without the need for modification. Alternatively, in another embodiment of the invention, the sliding of the outsole 119 along the contacting surface at the places of contact 133 and 135 could be improved by constructing parts of the underside of the outsole with a smooth plastic or similar material over the entire outsole or parts of it including the places of contact 133 and 135.
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In the alternative embodiments shown in
In the embodiment shown in
The elastic member 140 and/or the sole 114 in the case of an elastic sole, stores energy when bent and the energy is released when the weight is removed and the elastic member flexes back to its original form/position. When a flexible, resilient, elastic member, such as, for example, a metal strap or a plastic strap, are used, the footwear according to the invention therefore stores and releases energy during the various stages of the Gait cycle effectively assisting with walking and/or running. The energy stored is released between the mid-stance and the heel off stages of the Gait cycle causing the heel of the foot to spring up when the back end section 230 of the footwear comes up off of the ground and the stored energy is released. The user thus experiences a spring like effect causing a propulsion of the user's foot. The amount of force received is a function of the degree of inclination (convexity) of the bottom of the outsole, the elasticity of the sole (and/or elastic member), and the amount of weight (force) applied.
In the embodiment shown in
It is understood that the same dynamic arch effect can be achieved with a modified insole (or insert) for footwear instead of the outsole. As shown in the embodiment in
The present invention is not limited to just shoes and sneakers and insoles but also includes other forms of footwear including socks and hosiery configured with fixed or removable wedges and pads. The invention includes inserts for footwear or inserts for socks, as well as adhesive pads that can be removably adhered to the user's skin or to socks and hosiery.
The invention also includes embodiments of footwear with wedge shaped pads positioned along the traverse arch of the user's foot.
The rotations of the footwear causes the sole of the user's foot (and the footwear between the places of contact 533 and 537, such as, for example, for the embodiments shown in
In the embodiments shown in
The adhesive pad may be made from a semi-compressible material with shape memory, such as silicone. The adhesive pad could be made with a high friction coating on the upper surface and a lower friction coating on the bottom surface such that the adhesive pad can be adhered to the bottom of the foot surface outside of a shoe and then slipped into a shoe with the adhesive pad worn.
In
It is further understood that the invention is not limited to embodiments of footwear having the wedge shaped configuration along just one of the medial arch, the lateral arch, or the transverse arch, but rather also includes combinations thereof. For example,
For each of the embodiments shown in
In combination with the wedge shaped configuration 534 located at the back end of the footwear, the wedge like configurations 532 and/or 536 on the underside of the footwear cause bending/arching along the medial arch or the medial and lateral arch of the user when weight is applied as shown in position B. With the invention, arch splaying is eliminated as a result of the inferior compression of the user's foot along the medial arch, the lateral arch, and the transverse arch.
For the embodiments shown in
The description of the bottom surface of described above for
The second adhesive pad 750 (the heel area) has a bottom surface sloped upwards toward the concave curved upper surface of the adhesive pad along the longitudinal length from the place of contact located a) at the front of the second adhesive pad (on the bottom surface) to b) the back of the adhesive pad 750.
For the footwear according to the invention comprising two separate adhesive pads, when the first and second adhesive pads are worn together and weight is placed down onto the adhesive pads, both the medial side and the lateral side of the footwear rotate around the places of contact 533 and 537 in directions Z2 and Z1 respectively. The direction of rotation of the medial side of the footwear Z2 is about opposite the direction of rotation of the lateral side of the footwear Z1. The rotations of the footwear causes the sole of the user's foot (and the footwear where there is a part of the footwear between the places of contact 533 and 537) to arch, raising the portion of the device (and the user's foot above) between the places of contact 533 and 537. Splaying is reduced along the transverse arch of the user's foot increasing comfort in the footwear. In addition, the front end of the first adhesive pad 750 and the back end of the second adhesive pad rotate in opposite directions (in the longitudinal direction) along the medial axis of the foot or the both the medial and lateral axis.
It is noted that for any of the foregoing embodiments with one or more adhesive pads, the adhesive pads can be attached to a hosiery item (including a sock) as opposed to adhering the pad directly to the foot skin of the user. The pad(s) also could be fixedly attached (using adhesive or other fastening devices) to the outside bottom part of the hosiery item wherein the fabric of the hosiery item makes contact with the foot skin as opposed to any adhesive on the pad(s) making contact with the user's skin. In such an embodiment, adhesive may or may not be included on the top of the fabric layer (inside) to hold the hosiery item in position on the user's foot. The adhesive pad(s) also could be fixedly attached to the inside of the hosiery item, wherein the upper surface of the pad(s) will make direct contact with the foot skin but may (or may not) include adhesive. Finally, the present invention includes hosiery items with pockets in which the pad(s) of the invention may be placed in or integrally fixed in the positions hereinbefore identified, some of those embodiments also including adhesive inside the hosiery to attach the user's foot to the hosiery item. For such an embodiment, a slit or series of openings in the fabric of the hosiery item may be used that run along the perimeter of the pad/pads so one can access the inside surface of the sock/hosiery item and position the adhesive pad properly).
The size, shape and physical dimensions of the human foot vary from one person to another. Accordingly, there is no single distance between the wedge shaped portions according to the invention that works effectively for everyone. The invention thus includes footwear with spacing between the wedge shaped portions (and the places of contact) other than just for the embodiments shown in the figures and herein disclosed.
Accordingly, the invention also includes the process for measuring the bottom of one's foot and/or using molds or other similar methods to measure the bottom of a foot to determine the placement/location of wedge shaped portions (and places of contact) on footwear for the purpose of fabricating footwear according to the invention. Preferably, the places of contact for opposing wedges would be positioned inside the points of contact for the foot on either side of the medial arch, the lateral arch or the transverse arch. The process for making a sock, an insole, an outsole, an orthotic insert, and the like according to such process is part of the invention.
The present invention is unique in that when the footwear is in the flat foot phase of the Gait cycle, once the stable arch is established in a state of inferior compression with a shorter base, adding further pressure does not cause a splaying of the arch. To the contrary, adding more pressure will stabilize the arch further since now the force vectors are inward at the base of the arch. The arch base will not increase in length once inferior arch compression is achieved. Inward directed force vectors are established and resist splaying distraction force vectors. The opposite happens. Increased forces on the arch reinforce and enhance inward directed force vectors and stabilize arch further. A windlass arch and a splaying arch are mutually exclusive. A person cannot have shorter and longer plantar fascia at the same time. A user cannot have lower and higher arch height at the same time.
Another benefit of the invention is the reduction in talus pronation. The conventional teaching is that talus pronation occurs at the flat foot phase of the Gait cycle to stabilize the medial longitudinal arch. Once the talus and therefore the hind-foot pronates the arch is stable. The clinical observation of a) talus pronation followed by b) rigid arch, are indisputable. Applicant has discovered, however, that talus pronation is not the cause for a rigid foot arch. Rather, a rigid foot arch is a consequence of the splaying of the foot at the flat foot phase due to weight pressure on the arch. Arch stability is brought about by superior arch compression, not pronation which is consequential reaction to weight forces bringing it and the calcaneus into stable positions.
It is a clinical fact that the talus pronates at the flat foot phase when the splaying mechanism is active, but does not pronate at a heel-off phase when the Windlass mechanisms is activated, and the medial longitudinal arches are rigid in both states. Arch rigidity at the flat-foot phase is brought about by the splaying mechanism which generates superior arch compression with talus pronation and the rigid arch at heel-off phase is brought about by the Windlass mechanism which generates inferior compression without talus pronation. It logically follows that when there is inferior compression, as with the Windlass Arch, something does not allow for talus pronation. Applicant has discovered that the sub-talar joint has a “locking” mechanism that is activated only in a state of inferior arch compression (e.g., during a Windlass state). In the flat foot Gait phase when the splaying mechanism is activated force vector goes through the longitudinal axis of the talus in effect “unlocking” the sub-talus joint and allowing for pronation around the SAC force axis. During the swing phase when there are no arch compressive forces, the sub-talus joint is free and loose and talus falls into its default position which is neutral.
Accordingly, the footwear according to the present invention has numerous advantages including the following:
1) it creates a dynamic arch support—the invention assists and enhances foot biomechanics by a timely adaptation of foot arches from a semi-rigid neutral arch to rigid arch state and vice versa exactly when needed during all walking and running phase, allowing rigid arches unique properties of force neutralization and “shock absorption”. The inventions provides a dynamic arch support as opposed to a passive arch support.
2) it provides “shock absorption” by an alternative mechanism of a “compressed spring” like effect (rather than a “stretched spring” like effect which occurs during splaying) on foot arch under weight (load) at the flat foot phase walking and running gait, therefore acting as a “shock absorber” dissipating and blunting ground forces.
3) it provides force vector realignment. It manipulates foots arches structure in such a way that it changes direction of forces (vectors) acting on foots arches. It also redirects ground forces to foot arch from heel and forefoot, therefore increasing surface area and decreasing force per unit area.
4) it brings about potential energy (PE) storage within foot's arch by an alternative mechanism. PE is stored in the foot arch deformation. “Natural” foot by a “Stretching” spring action of the splaying arch superior arch compression, at the flat foot phase of walking and running, and according to the invention by a “Compressing” spring action of the Windlass like arch inferior arch compression.
5) it assists the foot and therefore body forward propulsion. When weight is withdrawn at heel off, the splaying arch of flat foot phase releases its stored PE. Arch base decreases and arch height increases. The arch reverts to its original “neutral” state and losses its superior arch compression. Kinetic Energy (KE) is dissipated in foot's horizontal plane. This energy is wasted without any beneficial effect toward forward propulsion since force vectors at arch base are inward. In contrast inferior arch compression in the Windlass like arch according to the invention aid forward propulsion. On weight withdrawal at heel off, when the posterior wedge is released and anterior wedge is still grounded, the PE stored in arch (inferior arch compression) (or rod) is instantly released as KE whose vector forces the heel up, assisting propulsion.
6) with increased pressure, the invention increases padding. With regular shoes, higher the pressure causes thinning of foot cushioning. With the invention, force vectors are redirected in such a way that with increase pressure (force) there is an increase in the thickness and surface area the force has to go through.
7) for the invention with a rod, the rod provides an added advantage of additional energy storage in the rod. When the wedges are connected by some means (metal, rubber, magnetic, etc.), the rod stores potential energy in the rod. Deformation is in addition to the stored energy in foot's arch deformation. This stored Potential Energy can be harness toward more powerful forward propulsion or captures (ex: battery). Opposing force Magnets (+,+) can act as a Virtual Rod storing PE.
8) the invention relaxes the Plantar Fascia (9B) With the invention, the Windlass like arch at flat foot phase of walking and running the base of the Medial longitudinal arch decreases (therefore relaxing Plantar Fascia as opposed to Splaying of the foot at the FF Phase in “Natural” foot at the FF Phase where the Plantar Fascia (PF) is stretched). In contrast, a passive arch support “kinks” the plantar fascia in a manner of passively pushing up on a bowstring, especially when the Windlass effect tightens it. This is a causes of pain and discomfort.
9) it causes a “SkinnyFoot” effect. With the invention, when weight is applied, the Windlass like arch shortens the base of the arches of the foot in flat foot phase, therefore allowing for narrower, slimmer, coronal (transverse), and/or sagital (front to back), area with increased load. This essentially brings about a smaller foot profile exactly when needed at the flat foot and the push-off phases of walking and running, and allows for tighter, slimmer, shoes (“Skinny Foot”). As opposed to normal splaying of the arches under load, which causes a larger foot profile and therefore tighter shoes.
10) it eliminates the need for passive arch supports. Passive arch supports are problematic. With the invention, there is no physical contact and therefore pressure on foot's arch concavity while it provides a timely dynamic arch support exactly when needed in the Gait cycle. Passive arch support provides a filler of arch concavity; it functions as an arch stabilizes during weight bearing at the flat-foot phase of walking and running. Keeping the arch structure passively stable but NOT rigid (it remains Semi-Rigid) hinders “normal” foots biomechanics of arches splaying, its transformation from a semi-rigid to a rigid arch, which would have facilitated rigid arch unique property of neutralizing opposing ground force. Since ground forces dissipate through the passive arch support, arch plasticity is restricted and fluctuation hindered, there are no arch compressive forces either inferior (concave) or superior (convex) which would have formed a distinct rigid arch, therefore foot arch cannot exhibit solid arches force neutralizing properties and Shock absorption is diminished. Passive arch supports also have a long term deleterious effect on the foot; they passively holds the foot as if in a cast, osteoporosis, muscle and ligaments atrophy sets in, with loss of the “rubbery glue” which keeps foot arch internal integrity. Subsequently, on bare foot walking without the PAS, the foot “Hyper-Splays” usually without achieving arch rigidity (Flat Foot) and is weak and unstable. Passive arch support “Kinks” plantar fascia passively, pushing up on the bowstring plantar fascia, especially, when the tight due to the Windlass. This causes pain and discomfort. Passive arch support press on the stretched plantar fascia during flat-foot and Windlass at push-off therefore cause “Kinky” Plantar Fascia which can cause pain.
11) it provides for a functional restoration of foot arch in pathologic states and diseases.
12) it helps a diabetic foot. Naturopathic foot-force vector shift causes redistribution of pressure points with increase padding on increase pressure, it redirects pressure from forefoot to dynamic arch support wedges and foot arches with increase surface area and allows Transverse and Lateral Arches rounding facilitating the “Skinny Foot” effect. These factors dissipate ground forces, distribute pressure points over a greater area and decrease foot functional volume in a shoe therefore lower or eliminate Pressure Ulcers.
13) it prevents osteoporosis—Oscillate created by the ground-reaction forces, “vibrates” foot, leg, pelvis and spine bones, stimulating them to increase in density. In addition, active muscular contraction in conjunction with passive ligaments stretching and shrinking, adds to these stimulus effects during walking, running and exercising. By contrast the impact blunting, shock absorbing shoe soles in “Regular” shoes and sneakers are “anti-vibration” denying increase bone density stimulus.
14) it avoids fluctuation and therefore conserves energy and increase power-Windlass like inferior arch compression is in effect in both the flat-foot phase (dynamic arch support mechanism) and push-off phase (Windlass mechanism) this allows for foot and leg muscle to rest conserve energy for an improved more efficient and powerful walking and running. In contrast during “Natural” walking and running fluctuation from superior arch compression at the flat-foot phase (Splaying mechanism) to inferior arch compression at push-off phase (Windlass mechanism) occurs. This Fluctuation mechanism requires energy, tires foot and leg muscles and accounts for a less efficient and less powerful walking and running.
15) it creates a Windlass like inferior arch compression, “Locks” sub-talar joint therefore preventing pronation or supination (true also for the Windlass Mechanism). The invention's inferior arch compression (similar to Windlass inferior Arch compression) “Locks” sub-talar joint while forming a rigid arch which does not allow for pronation (P), or supination (S) of hind foot relatively to fore-foot. Proof of this phenomena is clinical observation of the Windlass Mechanism during toe off and push-off phases whereas a rigid longitudinal arch with inferior compression forces is formed with the hind-foot and fore-foot in a solid “Neural” alignment without any pronation or supination.
16) it corrects foot pronation and supination anomalies and Pathology. Under load at the flat-foot phase the invention causes inferior arch compression, “locks” sub-talar joint in “Neutral” preventing and therefore correcting pathological dynamic pronation or supination.
17) it diverges plantar directed forces medially, toward big toe, achieving mechanical advantage by a longer lever arm at push off and toe off phases. Under load at flat foot phase in “Natural” gait pressure is distributed throughout the foot but mainly concentrated on the splayed medial, lateral and transverse arches. At toe off and push off forces are concentrated toward fore-foot and especially metatarsal heads. Diversion of force vectors toward medial longitudinal arch and 1st metatarsal brings about a longer lever with a mechanical advantage during walking and running.
18) it prevents heel valgus—Under load at the flat-foot phase the sub-talar joint is locked which not only prevents pronation but also heel valgus.
19) it prevents knee valgus and external rotation, therefore protecting knee from injuries. Since under load at flat foot phase the Windlass like mechanism with its inferior arch compression, “locks” sub-talar joint, prevents pronation and heel vagus, the compensatory knee valgus and external rotation does not come about. With the leg in “Neutral” the cruciates are “wound-in” and knee tight.
20) it brings about earlier “Locking” of Ankle. By preventing talus pronation and inferior arch compression shorting and “Rounding” medial longitudinal arch during flat-foot brings about earlier presentation of talar doom wider anterior articulate surface and therefore a stable ankle joint.
21) the invention can compensate for knee weakness. Earlier ankle locking allows for earlier full extension and passive locking of knee at heel strike which can compensating for knee weakness due quadriceps muscle atrophy.
22) it brings about a more efficient muscular Dynamic. Consistency of dynamic arch support and Windlass inferior arch compression, “locked” sub-talar joint. Elimination of talus pronation, and the increase in foot lever length in addition to the ankle earlier “locking” make for a stable more dynamically and efficient lower extremity therefore muscle tier less and can go a longer distance.
23) conserves legs Hydraulics and prevents stress fractures: Preservation of foots plantar soft tissue integrity keeps its hydraulic protection in addition to its spring like effect of “shock absorption” of foot's arch. Ground force shock dissipation occurred in a biological system when foot “shock absorption” mechanism of arch deformation is supplemented by force dissipation within muscles and other soft tissues of the foot and leg acting as a fluid envelope surrounding bone. Without this hydraulic force dissipation complex bones can breaks easily. Tired muscle looses their hydraulic properties which can lead to stress fractures.
This application is a continuation-in-part of and claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/070,886, filed on Mar. 15, 2016, which is a divisional of and claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/922,332, filed on Oct. 26, 2015, which is a continuation-in-part of and claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/621,069, filed on Feb. 12, 2015, which is a divisional of and claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/458,548, filed on Aug. 13, 2014, which is a continuation of, and claims the benefit of, U.S. application Ser. No. 14/340,151 filed on Jul. 24, 2014, each which is expressly hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety by reference thereto.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 975576 | Sexton | Nov 1910 | A |
| 1542460 | Legge | Jun 1925 | A |
| 1671713 | Glass | May 1928 | A |
| 1698003 | Rieke | Jan 1929 | A |
| 1698635 | Joyce | Jan 1929 | A |
| 1974161 | Riley | Sep 1934 | A |
| 2095488 | Cobb | Oct 1937 | A |
| 2111666 | Hubbard | Mar 1938 | A |
| 2184209 | Burger | Dec 1939 | A |
| 2212414 | Burger | Aug 1940 | A |
| 2390416 | Bettmann | Dec 1945 | A |
| 2411901 | Silver | Dec 1946 | A |
| 2717462 | Goin | Sep 1955 | A |
| 2779110 | Howell | Jan 1957 | A |
| 2884717 | Goldberg | May 1959 | A |
| 3693269 | Guarrera | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3922800 | Miller | Dec 1975 | A |
| 4120102 | Kenigson | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4232457 | Mosher | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4259792 | Halberstadt | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4333472 | Tager | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4372058 | Stubblefield | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4372059 | Ambrose | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4492046 | Kosova | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4494320 | Davis | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4494321 | Lawlor | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4507879 | Dassler | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4541184 | Leighton | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4550510 | Stubblefield | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4571852 | Lamarche et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4653206 | Tanel | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4697361 | Ganter | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4741114 | Stubblefield | May 1988 | A |
| 4843737 | Vorderer | Jul 1989 | A |
| RE33066 | Stubblefield | Sep 1989 | E |
| 4879821 | Graham et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4897937 | Misevich | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4910884 | Lindh et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4941273 | Gross | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4942677 | Flemming | Jul 1990 | A |
| RE33648 | Brown | Jul 1991 | E |
| 5079856 | Truelsen | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5170572 | Kantro | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5195257 | Holcomb | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5279051 | Whatley | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5319866 | Foley et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5345701 | Smith | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5367790 | Gamow et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5373650 | Dananberg et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5435079 | Gallegos | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5437110 | Goldston et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5469639 | Sessa | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5509218 | Arcan | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5621985 | Frost | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625963 | Miller et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5628128 | Miller et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5655315 | Mershon | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5701686 | Herr et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5729916 | Vorobiev et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5771606 | Litchfield et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5797199 | Miller et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5822886 | Luthi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5896679 | Baldwin | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5916071 | Lee | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918385 | Sessa | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5924219 | Healy et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6009636 | Wallerstein | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6029374 | Herr et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6065229 | Wahrheit | May 2000 | A |
| 6098319 | Epstein | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6120473 | Oliverio | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6199302 | Kayano | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6269554 | Silvestrini | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6393735 | Berggren | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6502330 | David | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6550160 | Miller, II | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6557271 | Weaver, III | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6609314 | Dubner | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6610897 | Cavanagh | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6640465 | Burgess | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6745499 | Christensen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6763613 | Brown | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6860034 | Schmid | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 7246454 | Kramer | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7272900 | Epstein | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7603794 | Oh | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7621057 | Julian et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7779557 | Teteriatnikov et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7788824 | Hann | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7793437 | Chapman et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7832119 | Gilmore | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7849612 | Epstein | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 8069583 | Simchuk | Dec 2011 | B1 |
| 8112905 | Bemis et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8186081 | Wilson, III et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8216162 | Bushby | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8225534 | Mueller et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8272149 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| D677455 | Pizzuti | Mar 2013 | S |
| 8434244 | Litchfield et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8495825 | Goldston et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8522454 | Schindler et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8522457 | Scholz et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8567097 | Edy et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8578630 | Diepenbrock | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8601722 | Frye | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8677651 | Cross | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8707586 | Adair et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8800174 | Banach | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8984770 | Piontkowski | Mar 2015 | B1 |
| 9095190 | Kohatsu et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9167864 | Piontkowski | Oct 2015 | B1 |
| 9204687 | Piontkowski | Dec 2015 | B1 |
| 9392842 | Piontkowski | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9857788 | Piontkowski | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9872534 | Piontkowski | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 20010027616 | Silvestrini | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049888 | Krafsur et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020078591 | Morrone | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020157279 | Matsuura | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20040025377 | Brannon | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040118020 | Hlavac | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040237165 | Holden | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040261291 | Paek | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050126040 | LeVert et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198864 | Bobbett | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050241187 | Johnson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050268488 | Hann | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278980 | Berend et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060026865 | Grisoni et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053664 | Tager | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060059726 | Song et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060137228 | Kubo | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20070107264 | Meschter et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070107265 | Mueller | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070180732 | Oh | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070193065 | Nishiwaki et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20080060229 | Epstein | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098621 | Tzeng et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080307678 | Nguyen | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090007455 | Montgomery | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090090028 | Moramarco | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090165333 | Litchfield et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090307925 | Pfister | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100050472 | Tzeng et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100212189 | Ebel | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251571 | Woodard | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100263232 | Smirman | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20110010964 | Hardy et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110023324 | Dananberg | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110214313 | James | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20120005921 | Diepenbrock | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120036739 | Amos | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120042539 | Miner | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120047770 | Dean et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120227284 | Adair et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120317835 | Raysse et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130000152 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130199056 | Li | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20140047740 | Tucker et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140059883 | Adeagbo et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140259786 | Heard | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140366401 | Cavaliere | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20160015124 | Grell | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160073731 | Piontkowski | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160174653 | Goodman | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160198800 | O'Neill | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20170251750 | Devoe | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1545255 | Sep 2013 | EP |
| 2358225 | May 2014 | EP |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report dated Dec. 22, 2015 from PCT/US2015/41791. |
| International Search Report dated Dec. 28, 2016 from PCT/US2016/58894. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180220737 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14922332 | Oct 2015 | US |
| Child | 15070886 | US | |
| Parent | 14458548 | Aug 2014 | US |
| Child | 14621069 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14340151 | Jul 2014 | US |
| Child | 14458548 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15070886 | Mar 2016 | US |
| Child | 15925575 | US | |
| Parent | 14621069 | Feb 2015 | US |
| Child | 14922332 | US |
