1. Field of the Invention
The present inventive concept relates generally to footwear having a special sole to provide for improved bio-mechanical operation, including improved foot-plant and together with a support mechanism for enhanced comfort and use.
2. Background Information
There are numerous types and styles of footwear and soles for use with footwear. Some examples of footwear having various sole design and various springing mechanisms include those disclosed in patents such as U.S. Pat. No. 8,209,883, U.S. Pat. No. 7,231,728, U.S. Pat. No. 8,474,154, U.S. Pat. No. 4,128,950, U.S. Patent Application No. 2013/0205619, among others.
While the foregoing products and methods may be beneficial, there is always room for improvement.
Applicant has recognized the footwear industry today tends to lack knowledge of how the foot biomechanically conforms to surfaces or performs when hiking, running, or walking, or recognizes that the industry simply provides products inadequate in this regard. The midfoot or forefoot are designed or have evolved in such a way that when a foot comes in contact with a surface, flexion of the ankle and plantar mechanism occur and the impact is placed upon the muscle fibers in such a way that provides for efficient relaxation-contraction and allows a powerful stride. Applicant has recognized that when the impact from contacting a surface is placed within the heel area, the plantar and ankle mechanisms are not utilized, or are not optimally utilized. The biomechanical structure of a heel impact forces the knee and hip to absorb the force, or absorb a greater-than-natural force, causing injury. Shoes today are cushioned in the heel and provide only minimal mitigation of the forces absorbed by the body during a heel strike. Without heel cushioning, and over longer distances, the heel impacts will result in painful sensory feedback, and to avoid the discomfort, a person will naturally shift the impact from the heel to the mid to fore-foot. Such heel cushioning over time can cause dramatic injury, particularly with heavier individuals and those who travel far distances. The current footwear with a cushioned heel absorbs enough of the heel impact to bypass the heel's sensory feedback. Over time and distance, the lack of sensory feedback with a cushioned heel impact often result in chronic injury to the plantar mechanism, knees, hips and/or spine.
Applicant has developed a sole believed to minimize strain upon the knees, hips, and spine, and decrease injury and allow natural foot/ankle movement. Biomechanically, an individual's foot is built to walk without shoes. Therefore, the arch and plantar mechanism are designed to act as a spring when the forefoot is loaded on impact. The thicker tissue on the foot demonstrates where a foot should truly contact a surface. The thick tissue padding extends from the posterior part of a foot, down through the lateral side of the foot, across the lateral metatarsals and ends in the forefront of the foot. There is also thicker tissue at the end of each toe. Applicant recognizes the arch region has no such tissue thickening. The heel pad is meant to support static standing for balance, but not meant to absorb the impact associated with a striding motion.
“Barefoot” shoes permit sensory feedback given by the heel, thus decreasing the individual's likelihood of making a heel strike. However the barefoot shoe lacks comfort when contacting the surface because it lacks significant thickness in cushioning at the impact zones of the lateral midfoot-foot and forefoot. Further unrecognized in existing footwear's technology today is the failure to address and promote the biomechanically correct method of running and walking. One aspect of Applicant's invention allows for a rigid plate-like heel which gradually tapers into an adequately cushioned pad at the lateral midfoot area. The plate-like material extends to or through the forefoot/metatarsals while the pad extends to or through to the toes. Applicant refers to the cushioned area at the midfoot area as the “impact zone.” In this midfoot area or impact zone is a junction where the tapered heel transitions to a flattened lateral portion at the midfoot. In one aspect a junction line is defined. Impact point or points lie along the junction line, also referred to as the impact line. The junction or junction line is positioned anterior the pivot point of the ankle of a wearer such that the ankle will dorsiflex (i.e., toes point upward), absorb the energy of the foot strike by loading the soleus/gastrocnemius, and then release that energy at the end of the stride. There is limited or no padding between the person's heel and the rigid plate. There is padding between the wearer's midfoot and the rigid plate, with such padding gradually increasing from the posterior aspect of the midfoot to the anterior aspect of the midfoot. The padding may increase because the plate slopes downward from an upper area of the sole to a lower area of the sole. In one example the rigid plate spans substantially or the entirety of the width of the heel and midfoot. In another example the rigid plate spans primarily along the medial aspect of the midfoot while avoiding the lateral aspect. In one aspect a pad or cushioned area lies laterally along the midfoot corresponding to where a foot's natural padding is positioned. In one example the rigid plate extends from the heel through the medial and central midfoot arch. In some aspects the plate has some inherent flex which may provide a springing action. A plate may be made from a variety of materials, including but not limited to carbon fiber.
The plate is configured to support the heel (which heel is suspended posteriorly due to the tapered orientation of the heel, i.e., absence of material positioned below the heel and above the surface) and prevent impact occurring between the arch of the foot and the surface. While the weight or force of the wearer acts upon the plate at the medial and central midfoot arch during a step or stride, the heel is supported/suspended by the rigid plate which extends posteriorly. The rigid plate operates as a spring or dampening force or anti-sag mechanism, storing energy during the early phase of the stride and then releasing it at or toward the end of the stride.
In further method aspects of the invention the pivot point or junction line of the sole is determined based on the physiology of a particular wearer. If the pivot point is positioned posterior to, at or generally near the Pivot Axis of the tibia, a foot plant will most likely tend to not result in a desired dorsiflex of the ankle; and where the impact point is positioned remotely anterior with respect to the Pivot Axis, the wearer will experience a rocking action such that the heel of the shoe or boot will contact the surface when the wearer is standing still under natural balance. As the anteriorly remote pivot point (or junction/impact line) is positioned closer to the Pivot Axis, the tendency of the wearer to rock backward will be reduced. Successive adjustments can be made regarding the positioning of the impact point with respect to the Pivot Axis to determine a preferred position (to the custom fit or desire of the wearer) where the wearer may stand erect comfortably without rocking back and forth which would otherwise occur due to the heel taper. A number of pivot point measuring techniques and associated devices are contemplated within the scope of the present invention.
The above abbreviated summary of the present invention is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment, aspect, or every implementation or object of the present invention. The figures and detailed description that follow more particularly exemplify these and other embodiments and further aspects of the invention. Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description, the accompanying drawings and the appended claims.
The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not necessarily to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. The intention is to cover preferred embodiments, modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention and as defined by the appended claims.
The subject inventive system may take on numerous physical and method embodiments within the spirit of the invention and only preferred embodiments have been described in detail below, which are not meant to limit the scope and/or spirit of the invention.
Human foot bones and structures have inspired the present invention. Aspects of the invention include a tapered/angled heel sole of an article of footwear and a combined heel support mechanism as further shown below.
Applicant appreciates that current footwear fails to address the need for true bio-mechanical movement throughout the foot. The need for a bio-mechanical design to allow proper impact of a foot to a surface is imperative to prevent injuries and fatigue, and to provide comfort for the consumer.
Applicant has come to appreciate that bio-mechanically the midfoot or forefoot are the appropriate sites for impact with running, hiking, or walking, which allows the arch of the foot and the plantar mechanism (muscle/tendon/fascia) to flex on impact in addition to permitting the ankle and the gastrocnemius/soleus muscles to bear a substantial portion of the impact. The flexing of ankle and plantar mechanism during appropriate impact expands the muscle fibers such that they are optimally primed for contraction and a powerful stride.
When the primary impact from a footfall is the heel, the plantar and ankle mechanism are not utilized, hence the knee (and to a lesser extent the hip and spine) must bear the brunt of the force. Bio-mechanically, the motion of the knee and hip during walking and running is not designed to adequately absorb the force from a heel impact. This results in abnormal stress on the entire skeleton from a heel impact. A heel impact also causes stress to the calcaneus and the origin of the plantar tendon. The plantar tendon is designed to bear forces in the parallel plane, not the transverse plane as with a heel strike.
Shoes, which are cushioned in the heel, slightly mitigate the forces with a heel strike, but not substantially. With fewer impacts (short distances) or lighter individuals, a heel strike with padded shoes often will not result in any immediate symptoms. However, heavier individuals or more impacts (longer distances) will often result in pain, which indicates injury.
Heel cushioned shoes also encourage heel strikes by absorbing enough of the impact to bypass the heel's natural sensory feedback. Without a cushioned heel, the calcaneus and the adjacent pad of the heel will start generating a pain signal with repeated impacts. This should modify the stride so that the heel is not taking the impact. The arch and plantar mechanism are bio-mechanically designed to act as springs when the forefoot is loaded on impact, but not to take an impact force from the plantar direction. The positioning of thicker “padded” subcutaneous tissue illustrates exactly where a person's feet are supposed to contact the ground. This thicker tissue “padding” extends from the heel, down the lateral aspect of the foot, across the metatarsal heads with small pads at the ends of the toes. The arch region has no such tissue thickening. Current footwear has an impact surface area that extends across the midfoot and often directs that force into the arch through “arch support”. These types of abnormal forces often in conjunction with a heel strike placing a similar plantar force on the origin of the plantar tendon from the calcaneous highly likely contribute to plantar tendon, muscle, and fascial injuries.
“Barefoot” shoes with little or no padding throughout the entire foot have helped alleviate the problem of heel striking by making sure the sensory feedback loop from the heel is not mitigated. However, such “barefoot” shoes do not provide adequate padding at the midfoot or forefoot which is appropriately bearing the substantial impact. This makes the shoes/boots or other similar footwear seem less comfortable, which inherently decreases the likelihood of people using or buying them. Additionally, the lack of padding does increase the transmission of heat from the ground (hot feet) and the risk of developing a stress injury to the midfoot or forefoot, particularly in individuals who are not accustomed or habituated to the bio-mechanically correct method of walking and running.
Current footwear addresses the need for additional cushioning throughout the foot to provide comfort on an impact, and in other inventions, a spring like mechanism to absorb shock. While current designs allow the foot to absorb minor heel impacts without causing stress to the body's calcaneus and plantar tendon, they do not address the fact that a foot is not designed to impact a surface with an individual's heel. The current invention, however, is bio-mechanically correct as it persuades the foot to contact the surface through lateral midfoot and fore-foot areas in order to prevent injury, particularly to the plantar mechanism, knees, hips, and spine.
Referring to
Impact point 30′ or points 30′ lie along and/or form impact line 30. Impact line 30, and associated impact point or points 30′, is located anterior to the ankle Pivot Axis (PA) as shown in
The Pivot Axis PA is a central vertical axis of the tibial-talar joint, or recognizing the human body includes loose or floating joint aspects, the Pivot Axis PA is a vertical axis demarcating a general line of rotation of the ankle joint in a dorsiflex motion of the foot. The Pivot Axis PA is shown or measured perpendicularly to the surface upon which sole 22 rests. While recognizing that it may or may not always coincide with the actual or perfect positioning of the true axis of the joint, for the purposes of ascertaining an objective reference point without directly testing a particular wearer, the central axis of the tibia may be used here as the axis coinciding with the pivot axis of the ankle. The true Pivot Axis PA and/or PA-H of a person may be measured with reasonable certainty as shown below. As shown in
Impact line 30 is situated on Impact Axis IA. Impact Axis IA is parallel to and offset anteriorly from Pivot Axis PA. In this aspect impact line 30 is oriented perpendicular with respect to sole 22. As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
“Impact zone” 35 is where footwear 20 at the lateral aspect of the sole 22 is the first portion of sole 22 to impact a surface S when a user is walking and/or hiking. Such impact zone is oriented about the lateral aspect of the midfoot 26. The junction area or impact area is positioned slightly anterior to the ankle. The mechanics of an impact in this region cause the ankle to flex and absorb some of the force. The 4th and 5th metatarsals will also flex as the impact rolls towards the forefoot 28 with a forward stride and further flexing the ankle and lengthening the Achilles/gastrocnemius (calf). This process of increasing flexion at the ankle loads the calf for a more powerful extension and push off at the end of the stride (providing an extra “kick”).
The “impact zone” 35′ in the case of when a person is running is at the forefoot 28. This allows the calf muscle to absorb more of the initial force (which is greater during running) and permit a high cadence. Additional power will be generated by the calf resulting in greater speed and/or more endurance as the work load is distributed to more muscles. A forefoot strike will also allow the foot arch/plantar mechanism to be fully utilized as it stretches/flattens on initial impact and then contracts/arches at the end of the stride.
As shown in
In one aspect, sole 22 provides no or minimal cushioning in the region of the heel 24 and medial midfoot 26 (arch). In other aspects the sole 22 includes no cushioning at the heel 24 and the medial midfoot 26.
Orientation of heel line 25 to span in a generally straight line from posterior 23 to impact line 30 accommodates a natural midfoot contact area. For instance, having a heel 24 which tapers from posterior 23 to impact line 30 of midfoot 26 encourages a walker or hiker to make initial contact with the surface at area 30. With traditional walking or hiking footwear, the heel of the sole includes material such that the heel area tends to strike the surface first, or before the striking of the midfoot. Having a clipped heel or having a heel 24 taper from posterior 23 to midfoot 26 promotes a desired strike at the midfoot 26. Applicant believes such midfoot strike promotes improved bio-mechanical operation of the foot and ankle. In one aspect heel line 25 of heel 24 tapers to a position anterior to the ankle of the wearer. In the example of
The sole 22 embodying principles of the invention consists of adequate cushioning across the entire forefoot. This cushioning increases for extra padding over the 4th and 5th Tarsal-Metatarsal joints, and in particular, the 4th and 5th Metatarsals, in addition to the Metatarsal-phalangeal joints. In one aspect the cushioning consists of a top layer which is made of a compressible material. Underneath the top compressible layer, several firmer layers help support the impact of a surface hit to the foot. These layers can be customized to a person's weight in order to perform optimally.
The inventor appreciates the foot is made to take impact to a surface through the lateral midfoot-foot and into the forefoot. The impact zone of the sole of the present invention is designed so the foot receives such impact. Similar to a walking/hiking foot strike, when running, the foot utilizes the spring mechanism when it is stretched and flattened upon a surface contact and then contracts within the arch as the foot comes to the finish of the stride. Over time it is expected that a user will begin to develop a modified and appropriate stride and foot strike. Through even short-term use a user is expected to have or develop muscle memory that repeats the desired action of impacting the midfoot-foot and/or forefoot instead of the heel area.
While the sole 22 is shown of various configurations, it may be appreciated that the sole 22 may correspond to either or both a left or right foot orientation.
In a further aspect the invention includes sole 22 with plate 50. As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The plate configuration may vary significantly from that in the exemplary embodiments 50, 50′. The plate generally provides a cantilevered support for the heel 24 to maintain heel shape and adequately bear wearer weight that might otherwise cause backward leaning that could bring the heel into contact with the surface S. Any configuration that will accomplish this is contemplated.
For example, the plate does not need to extend anteriorly to adjacent the toes and could extend to a considerably lesser extent along the midfoot portion so long as the plate is effectively anchored and provides the necessary support for the heel portion. This will generally require a degree of extension anteriorly into the midfoot portion so that the cantilevered heel portion will be adequately stabilized vertically relative to the midfoot portion. The degree of heel support is controlled principally by selecting the appropriate rigidity of the support material and the sole material under the plate anteriorly of the plate heel and against which the plate bears under the user's weight applied at the plate heel.
The plate may have areal sizes and shapes, as viewed from the top of the sole, that are different than those depicted over the plate heel and/or plate midfoot. For example, the plate may be designed primarily to support the plate heel. Alternatively, the plate may be designed primarily to reinforce the sole material, anteriorly of the heel, as against twisting or the like. Appropriate shapes would be selected for these purposes.
The plate can have a uniform thickness or may have strategically thickened regions. In the former case, it could be formed from a single piece of sheet material.
In a further aspect, the invention includes a method of customizing a footwear article 20 and/or a sole 22 to a particular user. A person may have his or her feet scanned (digitally, for instance) with the data stored and used to create parts and component parts of article 20 or sole 22. In one aspect a scan will be conducted to determine the pivot axis PA and desired impact axis IA of a user. The profile of the user will be used to create a custom made heel layer (having a plate option) conform to the particular user profile. The various other components of the sole 22 may likewise be custom made or custom selected and assembled to create article 20. In a further aspect, a 3-D or additive printing may be utilized to create the particular components.
In a further method aspect of the invention, the pivot point 30′ or junction or pivot line 30 is determined based on the physiology of a particular wearer. In one aspect with respect to
The impact point 30′ and/or impact axis IA is then determined. In one aspect, an anterior support 76 is provided under plate 70 to assure plate 70 is flat. Beginning at the previously determined ankle pivot point (pivot axis PA), fulcrum 72 is gradually moved forward until the wearer tips the plate 70 backward in the direction of Arrow A. Plate 70 may contact the surface S. The location of the fulcrum 72 is noted which corresponds to a tip back point, or impact point 30′ or impact axis IA. Of course, the impact point 30′ (and impact line 30, and the skew or orientation of the line 30) may be altered to accommodate more aggressive use and/or for rehabilitation or training purposes (i.e., where the wearer might not always be comfortable but in order to achieve a training or rehabilitative result). The fulcrum 72 may be moved between the ankle pivot point and the tip-back point (i.e., to define a corresponding pivot axis PA, PA-R and desired impact point 30′) until the wearer finds the most comfortable position. An anterior support element 76 is or may be provided, at least temporarily, while locating the tip-back point. A pressure gauge or gauges 78, 79 may also be utilized as desired to determine pressures/forces and record readings. The pressure gauges 78,79 may assist in determining if there is a least amount of combined pressure on the heels and toes). Low resistance stops may also be used to inhibit the forward and backward movement of plate 70 so that a person may step on plate 70 without severe tipping. An adjustable counterweight may also be used to balance plate 70 prior to the wearer stepping on plate 70. The wearer may place both feet (or one foot) on board 70 while standing to determine the desired ankle pivot and/or impact point 30′.
A further aspect includes manufacture and/or selection of a sole 22 (and or plate 50, 50′, and or article 20, 20′) utilizing the impact point data determined in the step or steps noted herein. An aspect of such manufacture and/or selection includes configuring the tapered heel 24 and/or positioning the plate 50 to accommodate a desired ankle flex as noted herein.
The foregoing relates to exemplary embodiments of the invention and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims. The scope of this invention also includes embodiments having different combinations of features and embodiments that do not include all of the above described features.
The present application claims the benefit and priority of Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/136,756, filed Mar. 23, 2015, FOR FOOTWEAR WITH TAPERED HEEL AND ARCH SPRINGS, under 35 U.S.C. §119(e), incorporated herein by reference as if fully reproduced herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1177777 | Kelley | Apr 1916 | A |
1872604 | Pierce | Aug 1932 | A |
1979391 | Laybott | Nov 1934 | A |
4128950 | Bowerman et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4237625 | Cole et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4722144 | Beerli | Feb 1988 | A |
4854057 | Misevich | Aug 1989 | A |
5179791 | Lain | Jan 1993 | A |
5507106 | Fox | Apr 1996 | A |
5727335 | Kousaka | Mar 1998 | A |
5752330 | Snabb | May 1998 | A |
5875567 | Bayley | Mar 1999 | A |
6029374 | Herr et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6055746 | Lyden et al. | May 2000 | A |
6131315 | Frye | Oct 2000 | A |
6260289 | Tsuji | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6393735 | Berggren | May 2002 | B1 |
6601042 | Lyden | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6625905 | Kita | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6826851 | Nelson, Jr. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
D507094 | Lyden | Jul 2005 | S |
7100308 | Aveni | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7231728 | Darby | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7681333 | Dardinski et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7762008 | Clark et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7793437 | Chapman | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7900376 | Rabushka | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8112905 | Bemis et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8146269 | Mueller | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8209883 | Lyden | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8474154 | Werremeyer et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20020157279 | Matsuura | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20060117603 | Park | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20090077830 | Lee | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090119949 | Song | May 2009 | A1 |
20090151201 | Lee | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090183393 | Lee | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110067267 | Lubart | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110185593 | Ramos | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120198723 | Borisov | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216424 | Lyden | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130205619 | Hartveld | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140047740 | Tucker | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0600145 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0860121 | Aug 1998 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160278476 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62136756 | Mar 2015 | US |