Patent Application
20220249736
The present disclosure relates to a foraminifera-derived bone graft material.
In general, when a bone tissue is damaged due to trauma, deformity, or physiological phenomena, guided bone regeneration (GBR), which is a procedure of filling a damaged bone tissue site with a bone graft material and covering it with a barrier membrane to prevent soft tissue intervention and to generate new bones, is performed. The most common GBR methods for restoration of a bone defect include an autograft method in which a portion of an individual's own bone is harvested from somewhere else in the body and grafted onto the body of the same individual, an allograft method in which a bone of someone else is chemically treated and grafted onto the body of an individual, and a xenograft method in which a bone of an animal is chemically treated and grafted onto the human body.
In the case of an autogenous bone graft material used for the autograft method in which a portion of an individual's own bone is harvested and grafted, autogenous cancellous bone (ACB) is generally grafted so that there is almost no immune rejection response and little bone resorption, resulting in excellent osteoconduction and osteoinduction abilities. In the case of an allogenous bone graft material and a xenogeneic bond graft material that are used for the allograft method and the xenograft method, respectively, there is an advantage of eliminating the need for secondary surgery on sites other than a site of bone loss of a graftee, which is concerned as a disadvantage of the autogenous bone graft material. This is because the allograft method uses the bone of an individual other than a graftee and the xenograft method uses the bone of an animal other than a human.
The allogeneic bone which is obtained from a dead body or other living donors is deep-frozen or subjected to freeze-drying, demineralized freeze-drying, and irradiation, so as to remove antigenicity for use. Although the allogeneic bone requires a long period of time for the bone formation and the amount of newly formed bones is small, it is available anytime in a desired amount and does not create an additional surgical site. Types of the allogeneic bone include a demineralized freeze dried bone allografts (DFDBA), a freeze dried boneallografts (FDBA), and an irradiated cancellous bone (ICB).
The xenogeneic bone is a graft material that expects osteoconduction ability by dropping immune responses through various processes after collecting bones from animals such as cattle or pigs. Despite of the advantages of not creating an additional surgical site and being sufficiently available in a desired amount, it takes long for absorption and substitution. Thus, such a mechanism currently tends to be understood in terms of osteoconduction rather than osteoinduction. Types of the xenogeneic bone are Bio-Oss, ABM/P-15, and BioCera™.
An alloplastic bone is not a real bone, but an artificially synthesized bone. In this regard, it has poor quality and requires a long period of time for the bone formation, as compared to other bone graft materials, but is inexpensive. For example, non-porous hydroxyapatite (HAp), HAp cement, porous HAp, beta tricalcium phosphate, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), hydroxyet-hylmethacrylate (HEMA) polymer, and bioactive glass are being used in clinical practice. Among these examples, HA, PMMA, and HEMA polymer are non-absorbent, whereas tricalcium phosphate and bioactive are absorbent. Examples of the alloplastic bone are tricalcium phosphate, hard tissue polymer, and bioactive glassy ceramics. Here, hydroxyapatite (HAp) has been widely used as a bone substitute in bone grafts and dental devices. HAp is a biocompatible and bioactive material having osteoconduction properties, and a chemical composition of HAp is similar to that of a natural bone tissue. HAp is a kind of calcium phosphate bioceramic, and may be synthesized by using a chemical substance containing a calcium ion and a phosphate ion as raw materials. Several reports on the preparation of HAp ceramics from marine algae via a hydrothermal reaction have been reported.
Accordingly, there is a need to develop a material having high cell proliferation and excellent adhesion for use as a bone graft material.
An aspect of the present disclosure provides a bone graft material with a unique structure having remarkable cell proliferation, cell adhesion, and osteoblast differentiation abilities and including a structure capable of supporting newly formed bones.
Another aspect of the present disclosure provides a method of preparing the bone graft material.
An aspect of the present disclosure provides a bone graft material comprising hydroxyapatite, wherein the hydroxyapatite comprises a plurality of chambers separated by partition walls, and the partition walls comprise a plurality of pores.
The hydroxyapatite may be derived from foraminifera (for example, the exoskeleton of foraminifera).
The foraminifera may refer to a protozoan of rhizopod having a shell. Examples of the foraminifera are genus Globigerina, genus Camerina, genus Elphidium, genus Myogipsina, genus Baculogypsina, and the like. In particular, the genus Baculogypsina may be Baculogypsina sphaerulata, Baculogypsina bonarellii, Baculogypsina gallowayi, Baculogypsina lenticulate, Baculogypsina meneghinii, Baculogypsina saoneki, or Baculogypsina sphaerica.
The term “bone graft material” as used herein may refer to a material that can be used for preservation of bone defects, stimulation of bone formation, joint fusion, and prevention of joint braking and dislocation, and that can be used in bone grafting. Therefore, in the present specification, the bone graft material may be used for treatment of bone defects.
In the present specification, the bone graft material may be, for example, applicable to ethmoid, frontal, nasal, occipital, parietal, temporal, mandible, maxilla, zygomatic, cervical vertebra, thoracic vertebra, lumbar vertebra, sacrum, rib, sternum, clavicle, scapula, humerus, radius, ulna, carpal bones, metacarpal bones, phalanges, ilium, ischium, pubis, femur, tibia, fibula, patella, calcaneus, tarsal, and metatarsal bones.
In addition, in the present specification, the bone graft material may be used in dentistry (dental implants), plastic surgery, or orthopedic surgery.
The term “osteogenesis ability” as used herein refers to a function of inducing or promoting bone matrix formation and osteoanagensis by osteoblasts, and includes all the cartilaginous osteogenesis, connective tissue osteogenesis, and transformed osteogenesis.
The term “osteoconduction ability” as used herein refers to a function of attracting osteoblasts to induce or promote bone matrix formation by the osteoblasts.
The term “osteoinduction ability” as used herein refers to a function of inducing regeneration of a desired bone tissue by accessing only cells and materials useful for bone tissue regeneration to bone defects.
The terms “administering”, “introducing”, “grafting” are used interchangeably, and may refer to arrangement of a composition according to an embodiment in a subject by a method or pathway that results in at least partial localization of the composition to a desired site. Cells or at least some of cell components of the composition according to an embodiment may be administered by any suitable pathway that delivers to a desired location in a living subject.
In an embodiment, the bone graft material may comprise a plurality of hydroxyapatite particles. Here, the particle size may be in a range of 50 um to 4,000 um, 50 um to 3,000 um, 50 um to 2,000 um, 80 um to 2,000 um, 100 um to 4,000 um, 100 um to 2,000 um, 100 um to 1,500 um, 100 um to 1,200 um, 100 um to 1,000 um, 100 um to 700 um, or 120 um to 600 um.
In an embodiment, the chamber may have a diameter in a range of 5 um to 200 um, 5 um to 180 um, 5 um to 150 um, 5 um to 120 um, 10 um to 100 um, 10 um to 80 um, 10 um to 60 um, or 15 um to 60 um. The chamber may have a cross-sectional area in an elliptical shape, and the diameter may refer to a short diameter and/or a long diameter of the ellipse.
In an embodiment, the pore may have a diameter in a range of 0.05 um to 5 um, 0.05 um to 4.5 um, 0.05 um to 4 um, 0.08 um to 3 um, 0.08 um to 2 um, 0.1 um to 3 um, 0.1 um to 2 um, or 0.2 um to 2 um.
In another embodiment, the partition wall may have a thickness in a range of 1 um to 50 um, 1 um to 45 um, 1 um to 40 um, 2 um to 40 um, 4 um to 40 um, 4 um to 30 um, 5 um to 30 um, 5 um to 20 um, or 5 um to 15 um.
In another embodiment, the hydroxyapatite may have, per 1 cm2 of the surface thereof, 20,000 uniform chambers to 100,000 uniform chambers, 20,000 uniform chambers to 80,000 uniform chambers, 25,000 uniform chambers to 80,000 uniform chambers, 30,000 uniform chambers to 80,000 uniform chambers, 30,000 uniform chambers to 750,000 uniform chambers, 30,000 uniform chambers to 70,000 uniform chambers, or 40,000 uniform chambers to 60,000 uniform chambers.
In another embodiment, the hydroxyapatite particle may comprise 0.5 weight %(atomic %) to 10 weight %(atomic %) of magnesium ions, 0.2 weight %(atomic %) to 10 weight %(atomic %) of silicon ions, or 0.1 weight %(atomic %) to 5 weight %(atomic %) of strontium ions. The term “weight %” as used herein refers to a weight percent and is typically expressed as a weight percentage of the total weight.
In an embodiment, the hydroxyapatite may be prepared by performing a hydrothermal reaction on the exoskeleton of foraminifera.
The term “hydrothermal synthesis” as used herein is also referred to as a hydrothermal reaction, and refers to a synthesis reaction of a substance in the presence of water at high temperatures or water under high temperatures and high pressures.
In an embodiment, hydroxyapatite in the bone graft material disclosed herein may be prepared by performing a hydrothermal reaction on a pretreated exoskeleton of foraminifera at a temperature of at least 30° C., 50° C., 80° C., or 100° C. or higher, for example, a temperature in a range of 30° C. to 600° C., 80° C. to 600° C., 100° C. to 600° C., 100° C. to 500° C., 100° C. to 400° C., or 100° C. to 300° C., for 2 hours to 40 hours, 2 hours to 30 hours, 10 hours to 40 hours, or 12 hours to 36 hours.
In another embodiment, hydroxyapatite in the bone graft material disclosed herein may be prepared by treating a pretreated exoskeleton of the foraminifera with microwaves.
In an embodiment, the bone graft material may or may not include tricalcium phosphate (TCP).
The term “not including” refers to “substantially not including”, and the term “substantially” as used herein refers to inclusion of a material in an amount that does not affect the activity of the bone graft material.
In another embodiment, the bone graft material may have cell proliferation ability, cell adhesion ability, or osteoblast differentiation ability.
In an embodiment, the bone graft material may further comprise cells, for example, somatic cells or stem cells.
The term “stem cells” as used herein may refer to undifferentiated cells having ability to differentiate into other cells. The stem cells may be embryonic stem cells, adult stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, or mesenchymal stem cells. The mesenchymal stem cells may be isolated from various tissues, various races, or people of different ages. For example, the mesenchymal stem cells may be adipose tissue-derived, placenta-derived, cord blood-derived, muscle tissue-derived, corneal tissue-derived, or bone marrow tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. In addition, for example, the mesenchymal stem cells may be adipose stem cells, bone marrow stem cells, cord blood stem cells, neural stem cells, placenta stem cells, or cord blood stem cells.
The bone graft material disclosed herein may further comprise a binding agent. The term “binding agent” as used herein may refer to a material that physically fixes, binds, or coagulates hydroxyapatite to prevent the bone graft material from immediately leaving a bone defect when applied to the bone defect. The binding agent may comprise a biocompatible material known in the art, and examples thereof are: dental resin cements; glass ionomer cements; collagen-based glues; phosphate-based cements such as zinc phosphate, magnesium phosphate, and the like; zinc carboxylate; and protein-based binders such as fibrin glues, mussel-derived adhesive proteins, and the like.
The bone graft material disclosed herein may further comprise an additive. The additive may be a medically acceptable additional component that is added to prevent infection of a bone defect or to further improve osteogenesis, osteoconduction, or osteoinduction ability of the bone graft material. Examples of the additive are: drugs such as antiviral agents, antibacterial agents, antibiotics, anticancer agents, and angiogenic drugs; polysaccharide aqueous solutions; amino acids; peptides; vitamins; cofactors for protein synthesis; growth hormones hormones such as somatotropin; endocrine tissue fragments; enzymes such as collagenase, peptidases, and oxidases; living cells such as cartilage fragments, chondrocytes, and bone marrow cells; immunosuppressants; fatty acid esters; and nucleic acids, but are not limited thereto. A person skilled in the art may select one or more suitable additives depending on a bone defect site and conditions of a subject.
The bone graft material disclosed herein may be formulated in the form of a powder, a suspension, an emulsion, an ointment, or an injection according to a conventional method, and then applied to a bone defect site or a surrounding area thereof. The term “dosage” as used herein refers to an amount sufficient to induce or promote formation or regeneration of bones when applied to a target site in need thereof. The dosage of the bone graft disclosed herein may vary depending on weight, age, gender, and health status of a patient, and degree of bone defects, and may be appropriately selected by a person skilled in the art.
In addition, another aspect of the present disclosure provides a composition for preparing the bone graft material.
The composition for preparing the bone graft material disclosed herein may further comprise one or more selected from the group consisting of water, saline, sterile water, Ringer's solution, buffered saline, cyclodextrin, dextrose solution, maltodextrin solution, glycerol, ethanol, liposome, lactose, dextrose, sucrose, sorbitol , mannitol, xylitol, erythritol, maltitol, starch, acacia gum, alginate, gelatin, calcium phosphate, calcium silicate, cellulose, methylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, methylhydroxybenzoate, propylhydroxybenzoate, talc, magnesium stearate, mineral oil, calcium carbonate, dextrin, propylene glycol, and liquid paraffin.
Another aspect of the present disclosure provides a method of preparing the bone graft material.
The method may comprise: pre-treating foraminifera, preparing hydroxyapatite by performing a hydrothermal reaction on the pretreated exoskeleton of foraminifera at a temperature in a range of 120° C. to 400° C. for 2 hours to 40 hours and/or preparing hydroxyapatite by treating the pretreated exoskeleton of foraminifera with microwaves; and/or sintering the hydroxyapatite.
The pre-treating of foraminifera may comprise: washing the foraminifera, and/or adding the washed foraminifera to an aqueous solution containing a compound capable of providing phosphoric acid.
The compound capable of providing phosphoric acid may be (NH4)H2PO4, H3PO4, Na3PO4, or Na2HPO4.
In addition, the preparing of hydroxyapatite by performing a hydrothermal reaction may comprise performing a hydrothermal reaction at a temperature of 30° C., 50° C., 80° C., or 100° C. or higher, for example, a temperature in a range of 30° C. to 600° C., 80° C. to 600° C., 100° C. to 600° C., 100° C. to 500° C., 100° C. to 400° C., or 100° C. to 300° C., for 2 hours to 40 hours, 2 hours to 30 hours, 10 hours to 40 hours, or 12 hours to 36 hours.
In addition, the preparing of hydroxyapatite by treating with microwaves may comprise treating with a microwave in a wavelength range of 300 MHz to 300 GHz in an amount of 100 W to 1,500 W for 0.5 minute to 48 hours.
In addition, the sintering may comprise: heating the prepared hydroxyapatite to a temperature up to 200° C. to 1,500° C.; and/or cooling the prepared hydroxyapatite. The heating may be performed at least multiple times. For example, the heating may comprise steps of raising the temperature to 400° C. to 800° C. at a rate of 1° C./min to 20° C./min, maintaining at the same temperature for a certain time (for example, 1 hour to 8 hours), and raising the temperature again to 600° C. to 1,500° at a rate of heating again with 1° C./min to 20° C/min. In addition, the cooling may be performed until the temperature is lowered to at least room temperature.
According to a foraminifera-derived bone graft material as disclosed herein, the foraminifera-derived bone graft material has remarkable cell proliferation, cell adhesion, and osteoblast differentiation abilities, and includes a structure capable of supporting newly formed bones, so that it can be effectively used as a bone graft material.
Hereinafter, the present disclosure will be described in detail with reference to Examples below. However, these Examples are provided for illustrative purposes only, and the scope of the present disclosure is not limited thereto.
The biocompatibility of foraminifera-derived hydroxyapatite (HAp) (also, referred to as foraminifera-HAp) was evaluated by using human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). In detail, cells were cultured under conditions of 5% CO2 and 37° C. in a-MEM (Gibco-BRL, MD, Gaithersburg, Md.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco-BRL), wherein the cells subcultured from passage 4 to passage 6 were used for in vitro experiments.
To induce osteoblasts differentiation, the cells were cultured in a medium supplemented with an osteogenic stimulator (0.1 mM of dexamethasone, 0.1 M of 6-glycerophosphate, and 50 μg/mL of ascorbic acid). All compounds used in the medium supplemented with the osteogenic stimulator were cell culture-grade reagents (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo., USA). A normal growth medium and the medium supplemented with the osteogenic stimulator were replaced with fresh media every 2 days during the experiments.
Before the cell culture experiments, HAp particles were first sterilized with 70% alcohol and washed with a phosphate buffer solution (PBS) three times for 10 minutes. After the sterilization, 20 mg of the sterilized pure HAp particles and foraminifera-derived HAp particles were added to a 48-well culture plate. The cells were seeded (at a concentration of 5×104 cells/well) and cultured for 2 hours so that the initial cells were attached to each HAp particle. The HAp particles to which the cells were attached were transferred to a new culture plate, and then cultured for in vitro experiments.
The cell proliferation was evaluated according to mitochondrial activity-based analysis using CellTiter96® Aqueous One solution (MTS assay, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif., USA). As described above, the hMSCs were seeded and cultured for 1 day, 3 days, 6 days, 9 days, and 12 days. At a predetermined point, 50 μL of a CellTiter96® reagent solution was mixed with 250 μL of the normal medium, and the mixture was added to each well. After 4 hours of the cell culture, the supernatant was collected to measure absorbance at 490 nm by using an ELISA plate reader (SpectraMAX M3; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, Calif.).
The cell viability and cytotoxicity were evaluated according to fluorescence staining by using Live/Dead® and a viability/cytotoxicity kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif., USA). According to the preparation protocol, the cultured HAp particles were washed with a PBS for 30 minutes. Subsequently, the cells were stained by using calcein acetoxymethyl ester (Calcein AM) and ethidium homodimer-1(EthD-1) of the kit, and then observed with an inverted fluorescence microscope (DM IL LED Flu( ) Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
To observe the cell adhesion on the surface and the cell infiltration to each HAp particle, the cells were cultured for 5 days. A specimen was washed with a PBS, fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution at 4° C. for 2 hours, and post-fixed with 0.1% osmium tetroxide solution. Next, the specimen was dehydrated via graded ethanol series (30%, 50%, 75%, 85%, 95%, and 100%, each for 10 minutes). Then, the resulting specimen was sputter-coated with gold, and then observed with an electronic microscope (EM; EM-30). To observe the cell infiltration, the HAp particles were sliced with a sharp lancet to expose cross sections of the surface, followed by SEM analysis.
The osteoblast differentiation was evaluated by ALP activity analysis. The ALP activity analysis was performed by using p-nitrophenylphosphate (p-NPP) as a substrate. In detail, the hMSCs were seeded on the particles, and then cultured in the medium supplemented with the osteogenic stimulator. After 5 days of the cell culture, adhesive cells were lysed by sonication in 1% Triton X-100/PBS solution under an icebox condition. To remove the particles and residues, the sample was centrifuged at 4° C. at a speed of 12,000 rpm. The supernatant was used for the ALP activity analysis and the protein concentration analysis. In the present study, the ALP activity was normalized to total protein contents.
To measure the osteoblast differentiation of the hMSCs cultured on the HAp particles, several osteogenesis marker genes, such as ALP, collagen type Iα1 (CoI1αI), osteocalcin (OCN), and bone sialoprotein (BSP), were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RPCR). After the cells were cultured for 7 days in the medium supplemented with the osteogenic stimulator, total mRNAs were isolated from the cells, and cDNAs were transcribed with a reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and oligo (dT) primers. Then, the cDNAs were amplified with TaqMan Universal PCR Master mix(Applied Biosystem) and primers and TaqMan probe sets for ALP (Hs01029144_m1), Colla) (Hs00164004_m1), OCN (Hs01587814_g1), BSP (Hs00173720_m1), and 18S (Hsscience). All TaqMan PCRs were performed by using a StepOne Plus RPCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., USA), and 18S rRNA gene was co-amplified as an internal standard.
4 adult male New Zealand white rabbits (age >3 months or more, 2.5 kg to 3.0 kg) were anesthetized with intramuscular doses of ketamine (35 mg/kg; Yuhan Corporation, Seoul) and xylazine (5 mg/kg; Bayer Korea, Seoul). Then, 2% lidocaine solution was used for local anesthesia. After tissue excision, three isolated circular cranial defects were made by using trephine with an outer diameter of 6 mm. One defect was used as a control group, another defect was filled with pure HAp particles, and the other defect was filled with foraminifera-derived HAp particles. The healing process was observed 8 weeks after the graft, and the defects and the surrounding bones thereof were incised from host bones. Then, before performing further analysis, the specimen was removed and placed in a fixing solution (phosphate buffered 4% paraformaldehyde solution, pH 7.2) at 4° C. for 7 days.
The newly formed bones were evaluated pathologically by micro-CT (Sky-Scan 1172TM, Skyscan, Kontich, Belgium). At the 8th week after the graft, the sample was analyzed by using an aluminum filter (0.5 mm) with X-ray set at a voltage of 60 kV and a current of 167 pA. Based on the micro-CT results, the qualitative images of the defects were observed with 3D reconstruction images based on a 3D software (CTVol, Skyscan), and the percent bone volume (BV) was calculated as follows by using an image analysis software (CT-analyzer TM, Skyscan).
BV(%)=(volume of new bones)-(volume of remaining graft material)/total defect volume
The histological analysis was performed at the 8th week after the graft. The fixed specimen of a rat cranium was treated with 8% formic acid/8% HCl to remove calcium deposit, and then dehydrated with graded alcohol series (70% to 100%). Finally, the specimen was placed in paraffin. Each specimen was cut into 5 pm sections by using a rotary microtone (HM 325™, Microm, Walldorf, Germany). Five sections from the center of each sample were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and Goldner's masson trichromand (MT). Then, the samples were randomly selected, and the formation of new bones was observed under a microscope (DMR, Leica, Nussloch, Germany).
The numerical values are expressed as mean ±standard deviation (SD), and the statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Then, the Dunnett's post-hoc test was performed by using GraphPad Prism version 5.3 (GraphPad Software, SanDiego, Calif., USA), wherein P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
1. Preparation of Hydroxyapatite (HAp) Particles by Using Foraminifera
The hydroxyapatite by using foraminifera were prepared as follows.
First, foraminifer (Baculogypsina sphaerulata, Okinawa, Japan) was purchased in the market. To remove residual contaminants and organic ingredients, the sample was boiled with 4% sodium perchlorate (NaClO4) and washed with distilled water. In detail, the sample was added to an ammonium phosphate monobasic ((NH4)H2PO4) aqueous solution, wherein a molar ratio of Ca:P was 10:6.
Subsequently, the sample was added to a Teflon-lined stainless autoclave, and heated at 200° C. for 24 hours. The transformed sample was washed with boiling water, and dried at 60° C. Then, HAp particles were chopped with a lancet, and HAp particles having a diameter in a range of 200 pm to 500 pm were separated by filtration through a stainless mesh. Afterwards, the crystallization was performed on the separated particles by a sintering process. The sintering was performed in an electric furnace (Muffle Furnace, SH-FU-4MH), wherein, after the temperature was raised to 600° C. at a heating rate of 5° C./min, the same temperature was maintained for 2 hours. Afterwards, the temperature was raised again to 800° C. at a heating rate of 5° C./min, and the same temperature was maintained for 4 hours. Then, the temperature was lowered to room temperature, thereby completing the sintering progress.
Here, as a control group, HAp particles (pure HAp particles having a particle size in a range of 200 μm to 500 μm) that were stoichiometrically synthesized were obtained from Dio Implant Inc. (Busan, Korea) and used.
2. Chemical and Morphological Characteristics
To analyze compositions of the foraminifera-derived HAp of Example 1, the X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD; D8, Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) using CuKa radiation was performed under conditions of a scanning rate of 0.02°/minute, voltage of 50 kV, and currency of 30 mA in a range of 10° to 80°. The ionic compositions of the sample was evaluated by X-ray fluorescence (XRF, Bruker) spectroscopy. The microstructure and surface morphology of the foraminifer-derived HAp particles were observed under vacuum by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM; EM-30, COXEM, Daejeon, Korea).
The SEM images obtained by observation are shown in
As shown in
In addition, as shown in
As shown in
To evaluate cytotoxicity of the foraminifera-derived HAp particles, the live/dead staining analysis was performed as described in Reference Examples, and results are shown in
As shown in
As described in Reference Examples, the cell proliferation of hMSCs in foraminifera-derived HAp was measured by using MTS mitochondrial activity-based assay. Results are shown in
As shown in
By using the methods described in Reference Examples, the cell adhesion and infiltration of the hMSCs with respect to the pure HAp particles and the foraminifera-derived HAp particles were observed by using SEM on the 5th day of the cell culture, and results are shown in
As shown in
To analyze the osteoblast differentiation ability, the ALP activity and qRT-PCR were performed as described in Reference Examples to detect osteoblast marker genes, such as ALP, Colla1, OCN, and BSP. Results are shown in
As shown in
Also, as shown in
These results suggest that hydroxyapatite according to an embodiment had significant osteoblast differentiation ability compared to pure hydroxyapatite.
To evaluate in vivo osteoanagenesis ability of foraminifera-derived HAp prepared according to Examples above, the Micro-CT evaluation and histological evaluation were performed.
In detail, as described in Reference Examples, 3D micro-CT images were obtained at the 8th week after the graft, and results are shown in
As shown in
Also, as shown in
As shown in
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10-2019-0107653 | Aug 2019 | KR | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/KR2020/009933 | 7/28/2020 | WO |
