This invention relates to a device using fluids for controlling mechanical forces such as vibrational forces.
Force-controlling devices are used for example in vehicle suspension systems. Vehicle suspension systems typically employ passive suspension systems, such as a spring in parallel with a damper. A problem with such systems however is that the optimization of the various performance requirements is limited due to the large masses required in practice to exploit inertial forces. The device of U.S. Pat. No. 7,316,303 addresses this problem by providing a component for building a suspension system with any desired mechanical impedance, but with the overall mass of the suspension system being kept small.
The device disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,316,303 typically consists of a linear to rotary transducer, connected to a flywheel. Several variations of this device have been proposed, some including for example the use of ball screws or racks and pinions. One disadvantage of these is that there is a considerable number of moving parts.
The present invention therefore seeks to provide a simplified device wherein the number of moving parts is greatly reduced.
According to the present invention, there is provided a device for use in the control of mechanical forces, the device comprising:
first and second terminals for connection to components in a system for controlling mechanical forces and independently moveable; and
a hydraulic device connected between the terminals and containing a liquid, the hydraulic device being configured to produce upon relative movement of the terminals, a liquid flow to generate an inertial force due to the mass of the liquid to control the mechanical forces at the terminals such that the mechanical forces are substantially proportional to the relative acceleration between the terminals.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a device wherein the moving liquid acts as storage for kinetic energy. An advantage of the device according to the present invention is its tractability in production.
The hydraulic device may further comprise a housing defining a chamber for containing the liquid, the housing being attached to one of the terminals; and a piston attached to the other terminal and movable within the chamber such that the movement of the piston causes the liquid flow along at least one flow path.
The at least one flow path may be helical. Accordingly, the present invention provides a device wherein a liquid acts both as the linear to rotary transducer as well as storage for rotational kinetic energy.
The at least one flow path may be provided either outside or inside the chamber.
The device may further comprise an adjusting mechanism to control the mechanical forces at the terminals such that they are proportional to the relative acceleration between the terminals, the proportionality term being a fixed constant.
The device may further comprise a limiter device configured to restrict the extent of relative movement of the two terminals.
The invention also provides a mass simulator comprising a device according to the above definitions.
The present invention also provides a mechanical damping system, such as a system within a car suspension, employing a device as defined above.
The invention also provides a method for vibration absorption, employing a device as defined above.
Examples of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Two prototypes were built and tested, one provided with a coil external to the cylinder as in
The motion of the piston 3 may be restricted by devices such as spring buffers 90. Such means may provide a useful safety feature to protect the device if large forces or velocities were generated at the limits of travel of the piston.
The device of
In the example shown in
Consider the arrangement shown in
The total mass of liquid in the helical tube is approximately equal to:
ρnπr32√{square root over (h2+(2πr4)2)}=:mhel. (1)
The total mass of liquid in the cylinder is approximately equal to:
ρπ(r22−r12)L=:mcyl. (2)
If the piston is subject to a linear displacement equal to x, then a fluid element in the helical tube may expect an angular displacement θ (rads) approximately equal to:
The moment of inertia of the total liquid mass in the helical tube about the axis of the piston is approximately equal to mhelr42=:J. Now suppose that device 1 has an ideal behavior with b representing the proportionality constant wherein the generated inertial force between the terminals is proportional to the relative acceleration between the terminals. Then we would expect:
Let mtot=mhel+mcyl for the total liquid mass. Exemplary values are tabulated below for two different liquids used in the embodiment shown in
As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the modeling and testing work demonstrated that the produced inertance effect (force proportional to acceleration) could be sufficiently large (the proportionality constant b is greater than 50 kg). Such effect would be needed where the device is placed in parallel with a spring and damper.
Furthermore, the modeling and testing demonstrated that the viscosity of the liquid provides a departure from ideal behavior. A further parasitic element might be provided by the compressibility of the fluid which might be modeled as a spring in series with the two parallel elements.
In U.S. Pat. No. 7,316,303, an ideal device is defined (i.e., the force proportional to relative acceleration) and deviations caused by friction, backlash etc. are regarded as parasitics which can be made as small as needed so that the essential function of the device is achieved. In the case of the present invention however, the non-linear damping caused by liquid viscosity is intrinsic, and will cause a deviation from ideal behavior at large piston velocities.
The non-linear damping intrinsic to the present invention is “progressive”, namely the force increases with a relative velocity at a faster rate than linear. Practical dampers in automotive applications are often regressive, namely the force increases with a relative velocity at a slower rate than linear. Even when using ordinary liquids such as hydraulic fluids, the device according to the present invention can be configured to display an ideal behavior, using adjusting means 80. For example, shim packs at the orifices 6, 7 could be employed to achieve a more linear damping characteristic, although this would leave a non-negligible parallel damper. This has the potential to create a convenient integrated device with the behavior of an ideal device according to the present with a linear damper in parallel. In other circumstances it may be advantageous not to correct for the viscosity effect.
The following details the effects of damping. Let u be the mean velocity of fluid in the helical tube, Δp the pressure drop across the piston μ the liquid viscosity, and l the length of the helical tube, where
l=n√{square root over ((h2+(2πr4)2)} (6)
The pressure drop Δp across the main piston required to maintain a flow in the tube of mean velocity u will now be calculated. This will allow the steady force required to maintain a piston relative velocity {dot over (x)} to be calculated, and hence a damping coefficient.
Given that A1{dot over (x)}=A2u, the Reynolds Number (Re) for the tube is equal to
with transition from laminar to turbulent flow occurring around (Re)=2×103.
Assuming that u is small enough so that laminar flow holds, and using the Hagen-Poiseuille formula for a straight tube gives:
The force on the piston required to maintain a steady relative velocity {dot over (x)} is equal to ΔpA1. This suggests a linear damping rate coefficient equal to:
The pressure drop needed to maintain a turbulent flow, according to Darcy's formula is:
where f is a dimensionless friction factor. For a smooth pipe the empirical formula of Blasius is:
f=0.079(Re)−1/4. (11)
This gives the following expression for the constant force on the piston required to maintain a steady velocity:
Let the fluid be water with ρ=100 kg m−3, μ=10−3 Pa s. Take l=7 m, r1=8 mm, r2=20 mm, r3=4 mm, L=300 mm. This results in a device with:
The transition to turbulent flow occurs at a piston velocity of {dot over (x)}=0.0119 m s−1 at velocities consistent with laminar flow, the damper rate is
The pressure drop and linear force in conditions of turbulent flow are shown in
If r1, r2 and r3 are all increased by a factor of 2 and 1 is reduced by a factor of 4 and then mhel and b are left unchanged, mcyl is increased by a factor of 4 and the damping force in turbulent flow is reduced by a factor of 21.25=2.38.
The helical tube shown in
For automotive suspension applications, an embodiment of the present invention in parallel with the regular spring and a damper is advantageous if the suspension is relatively stiff. For ordinary passenger cars, the parallel configuration may need to be combined with other series elements.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0913759.7 | Aug 2009 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/GB2010/001491, filed on Aug. 6, 2010, entitled “Force-Controlling Hydraulic Device,” which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to Application No. GB 0913759.7 filed on Aug. 6, 2009, entitled “Force-Controlling Hydraulic Device,” the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1952902 | Barros | Mar 1934 | A |
3656633 | Ostwald | Apr 1972 | A |
3795390 | Kendall et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
4425836 | Pickrell | Jan 1984 | A |
5257680 | Corcoran et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5487454 | Klembczyk et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
6811168 | Acker et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7316303 | Smith | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20040104522 | Wolf et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050034943 | Smith | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1077006 | Nov 1954 | DE |
19834316 | May 2000 | DE |
102006009631 | Dec 2006 | DE |
786839 | Nov 1957 | GB |
2044882 | Oct 1980 | GB |
0058642 | Oct 2000 | WO |
03005142 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion in counterpart International Application No. PCT/GB2010/001491, mailed Nov. 4, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120199428 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/GB2010/001491 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13366591 | US |