The present invention relates to force measurement, in particular to non-contact force measurement. Particularly, the invention relates to a force measurement device for measuring a force applied to a test object. More particularly, the invention relates to a magnetic based force measurement device for measuring a force applied to a test object.
Force measuring is important for many industrial applications, in particular for arrangements being dynamically impacted by a force. Applied forces may be pressure forces as well as moments like torque and bending impact. An exemplary application for torque is a shaft for a vehicle being arranged between a motor and a wheel. For determining a torque in the shaft, either a particular element needs to be mounted to the shaft, or the shaft needs to be pre-processed, e.g. magnetized. Mounting elements to a shaft may influence the movement of the shaft, pre-processing may be difficult when the shaft is not accessible or cannot be dismounted for pre-processing.
It may be seen as an object of the present invention to provide a magnetic principle based mechanical force sensing technology with increased measuring accuracy.
This object is solved by the subject matter of the independent claim, further embodiments are incorporated in the dependent claims and in the following description.
According to a first aspect, a force measurement device for determining a force applied to a test object is provided. The force measurement device comprises a flux concentrator with a first pole, a second pole, a third pole, and a fourth pole, a magnetic field generating unit configured to generate a magnetic field for being applied to a test object, a magnetic field sensing unit with a first magnetic field sensor, a second magnetic field sensor, a third magnetic field sensor, and a fourth magnetic field sensor. The flux concentrator is arranged such that each of its poles concentrates the magnetic field generated by the magnetic field generating unit. The first, second, third, and fourth pole are arranged such that they form a quadrangle. A first recess is provided such that the first pole is spaced apart from the second pole and the third pole is spaced apart from the fourth pole. A second recess is provided such that the first pole is spaced apart from the third pole and the second pole is spaced apart from the fourth pole. The first magnetic field sensor and the third magnetic field sensor are arranged opposite to each other with the flux concentrator in between and such that the first magnetic field sensor and the third magnetic field sensor both face the first recess. The second magnetic field sensor and the fourth magnetic field sensor are arranged opposite to each other with the flux concentrator in between and such that the second magnetic field sensor and the fourth magnetic field sensor both face the second recess. The magnetic field sensing unit is configured to provide a signal as an indicator for a force applied to the test object.
The flux concentrator is shaped like a quadrangle and may be of any quadrangular shape, especially any regular quadrangle like square or rectangle, wherein the poles are arranged at or form the corners of the quadrangle.
The first recess extends from one side to the opposite side of the flux concentrator. The same applies to the second recess. In particular, the first and second recesses are perpendicular with respect to each other. In other words, the recesses extend between the poles and define a gap between the poles.
The first and third magnetic field sensors are arranged such that they detect magnetic field lines evading from the first recess. Similarly, the second and fourth magnetic field sensors are arranged such that they detect magnetic field lines evading from the second recess. Based on the intensity of the magnetic field lines evading from the first and second recess and detected by the magnetic field sensors, the magnetic field sensing unit provides a signal that is indicative for the force applied to a test object.
The magnetic field generating unit generates a magnetic field and the field lines pass through the poles of the flux concentrator. Furthermore, the magnetic field lines passing through one of the poles influence the magnetic field lines passing through the other poles. As a result, the intensity and/or density of the magnetic field lines is higher between the poles, i.e., at the first and second recesses. In addition to the mutual influence of the magnetic field lines passing through the poles of the flux concentrator, the permeability of the test object also influences the magnetic field lines such that the intensity and/or density of the magnetic field lines evading from the first and/or second recess differs. It has been recognized that the permeability of the test object, especially of a surface layer of the test object, changes when a force is applied to the test object. Thus, the altered magnetic field intensity evading from the first and second recess can be used as an indicator for the applied force.
The force measurement device described herein is configured to measure the difference in the permeability at the surface of the test object. The directional permeability inside the material of the test object (especially a ferro-magnetic test object) is subject to the applied mechanical stresses, i.e., the magnetic permeability will increase or decrease in a specific direction when the corresponding mechanical forces act onto the test object. The ability of the test object to take on (absorb) magnetic field lines coming from the outside (like from a magnetic field source or the magnetic field generating unit) that want to travel in a certain direction will be modulated (influenced) by the mechanical stresses that act onto the test object. The force measurement device (may also referred to as sensing element) creates a magnetic field at one magnetic pole (facing the test object) that will be injected into the surface of the test object. Magnetic field sensors (first to fourth magnetic field sensors, S1 to S4) are placed at four strategic locations where the magnetic flux density will be highest when the sensing element is not placed at the test object. When the sensing element is placed on top of a test object (spaced apart at a certain distance from the surface of the test object) then some (or near all) of the magnetic flux generated by the magnetic field generating unit will be “absorbed” by the test object before returning to the other end (the second magnetic pole) of the magnetic field generating unit. When the directional sensitive permeability of the test object is changing (meaning that in a first axis the permeability will increase while in another direction or second axis, e.g., orthogonal to the first axis, it will then decrease), the magnetic field sensors will pick-up the magnetic flux that has not been absorbed by the test object. The signal amplitude differences between the first pair of sensors (first and third magnetic field sensors) versus the second pair of sensors (second and fourth sensors) indicates that the permeability in the surface of the test object has changed in a specific direction.
According to an embodiment, the first, second, third, and fourth pole are arranged such that they form a square.
Thus, the distance between one pole and each of its two direct neighbors along a circumference of the square is equal.
According to a further embodiment, the first, second, third, and fourth pole extend in the same direction and are parallel to each other.
Especially, the poles all extend towards a surface of the test object such that the magnetic field lines are directed to intrude or enter the test object.
According to a further embodiment, the first recess and the second recess extend over an entire width of the flux concentrator.
Thus, there is a direct line of sight between the magnetic field sensors opposite to each other. The first and second recesses may be referred to as a groove having a depth in a direction of extension of the poles and a width from one lateral side of the flux concentrator to an opposite lateral side. In one embodiment, each of the first and second recesses has a uniform width and uniform depth.
According to a further embodiment, the first recess and the second recess intersect at an angle between 85° and 95°.
According to a further embodiment, the first recess and the second recess extend over an entire width of the flux concentrator, i.e., from one lateral side of the flux concentrator to an opposite lateral side.
According to a further embodiment, a distance between two opposite magnetic field sensors is larger than a width of the flux concentrator.
Thus, the magnetic field sensors are spaced apart at a certain distance from the flux concentrator and the respective poles.
According to a further embodiment, two opposite magnetic field sensors are equally spaced apart from a circumference of the flux concentrator, such that a lateral offset between each of the two opposite magnetic field sensors and the circumference is equal.
In other words, the flux concentrator is centered between two opposite magnetic field sensors.
According to a further embodiment, the flux concentrator comprises a base plate and each one of the poles is arranged at the base plate. Thus, there is a magnetic connection between the poles of the flux concentrator.
According to a further embodiment, the flux concentrator is formed in one piece. For example, the flux concentrator is made of a single block. In one example, the flux concentrator is a monobloc concentrator.
According to a further embodiment, the magnetic field sensors are arranged such that a sensing direction of the magnetic field sensors is directed towards the first or second recess.
The magnetic field sensors are arranged such that they detect the magnetic field lines, i.e., their intensity and/or density, evading from one of the recesses. Thus, the force measurement device described in this embodiment focuses on the impact of the test object's permeability on the magnetic field lines evading from the recesses of the flux concentrator instead of measuring the direction or intensity of the magnetic field lines evading from the test object.
According to a further embodiment, the magnetic field sensors are arranged such that a sensing direction of the magnetic field sensors is parallel to the poles of the flux concentrators.
In this embodiment, the magnetic field sensors detect the magnetic field lines evading from the test object's surface. However, the magnetic field sensors are located opposite to one of the recesses. The magnetic field lines evading from the recesses also intrude the test object and return to the magnetic pole. Therefore, also those magnetic field lines are impacted by the changed permeability of (a surface layer of) the test object due to an applied force.
According to a further embodiment, the flux concentrator is made of ferrite or ferromagnetic material.
According to a further embodiment, the magnetic field generating unit comprises a first coil that is wound around all of the first, second, third, and fourth pole along a circumference of the flux concentrator, and the first coil is connected to a power source that provides an electric signal to the first coil such that the first coil generates a magnetic field.
This magnetic field is concentrated by the flux concentrator and the poles direct the magnetic field lines towards the surface of the test object.
According to a further embodiment, the force measurement device further comprises a first adder, a second adder, and a signal processing unit. The first magnetic field sensor and the third magnetic field sensor are connected to the first adder so that the signal provided by these sensors are added. The second magnetic field sensor and the fourth magnetic field sensor are connected to the second adder so that the signal provided by these sensors are added. The signal processing unit is connected to the first adder and to the second adder and configured to process the signals provided by the first and the second adder in order to determine a force applied to a test object.
In the following for further illustration and to provide a better understanding of the present invention exemplary embodiments are described in more detail with reference to the enclosed drawings, in which
It can be seen that the magnetic field lines of the magnetic field 2 run differently in the air surrounding the permanent magnet 1 and in the test object 5 (in particular a ferro-magnetic test object). It has been recognized that a specific part of the magnetic field lines run through a surface layer of the test object. If the permeability of the test object 5 changes due to an applied force (for example torque or bending), this also influences the magnetic field lines of the magnetic field so that a conclusion can be drawn from the measured magnetic field to the intensity of the applied forces. However,
When placing a symmetrical shaped permanent magnet onto a ferro magnetic object, under normal circumstances, the magnetic field that is running beneath the permanent magnet inside the surface of the test object and the magnetic field lines are evenly distributed.
When placing two identical symmetrically shaped permanent magnets side-by-side and close to each other onto a ferro magnetic object, then the repellent forces of the flux lines from the two magnets 1A, 1B create two concentrated areas of magnetic field distribution (above and below the gap 3 shown in the top view of
The magnetic field sensing unit 300 comprises four magnetic field sensors 310, 320, 330, 340. The first and the third magnetic field sensors 310, 330 are arranged opposite to each other with the horizontal gap in between and the second and fourth magnetic field sensors 320, 340 are arranged opposite to each other with the vertical gap in between. Thus, the magnetic field sensors detect the magnetic field intensity evading from the respective gap, as indicated by the arrows. As can be seen in the side view of the force measuring device 10, the magnetic field sensors are arranged on a level with the end faces of the poles, wherein the end faces are directed towards the test object. Thus, the magnetic field sensors detect a maximum deflection of the magnetic field lines.
In the side view of
Basically, the force measurement device 10 consists of a sensing element and the sensor electronics (not shown in
The values of the magnetic flux concentrations evading from the horizontal and vertical gap can be measured using magnetic field sensors (MFS) like hall effect sensors or flux gate devices (for example). In
Generally, placing four identically sized and symmetrically shaped magnets in a square shape side-by-side onto a ferro magnetic object (unloaded, i.e., no mechanical forces are applied to the object) will result in an increased magnetic flux concentration in four areas as shown in
Mechanical stress or load applied to the test object will influence the permeability and, therefore, the magnetic field. For example, the more mechanical stress is travelling through the surface of the test object, the smaller the returning sensor signal will be. However, an applied force will influence the magnetic field evading from the two recesses in a different manner as will be explained in more detail below.
Terminating the four poles of the flux concentrator with a base plate may increase the signal strength of the force measuring device. The base plate is optional and may allow to measure smaller signals and may improve the signal-to-noise ratio. The flux lines concentration of the flux lines that are travelling through the test object are manipulated or influenced by the mechanical stresses that are applied to the test object. The mechanical stresses act on the magnetic domains (inside the test object) and have an impact on the directional permeability of the test object, especially of the surface of the test object. Examples thereof are shown in
Depending on the mechanical forces applied to the test object, the concentrated magnetic field exiting the four flux zones will be differently strong or intense. The picture in the middle shows also the placement of the four magnetic field sensors with respect to the poles of the flux concentrator.
The left picture schematically shows the effect of a positive torque (torque in a first direction) applied to the test object. The magnetic field lines evading from the vertical gap are more intense than the magnetic field lines evading from the horizontal gap.
The right picture schematically shows the effect of a negative torque (torque in a second direction opposite to the first direction mentioned above with reference to the left picture) applied to the test object. On the right, the magnetic field lines are converse to those shown on the left. Magnetic field lines evading from the vertical gap are less intense than the magnetic field lines evading from the horizontal gap.
The middle picture shows the unloaded case with the magnetic field lines evading from the horizontal gap being equally intense as those evading from the vertical gap.
In
Generally, the second recess 170 and the first recess 160 intersect each other at an angle between 85° and 95°, preferably 90°.
In the embodiment of
In
The magnetic field generator may be driven by a DC (direct current) or by an AC (alternating current) signal type. In one embodiments, the force measuring device will be driven by a DC (direct current) and only two magnetic field sensors (from the possible four MFS) will be used.
While this circuit is straight forward and very simple, the output signal may be sensitive to certain type of magnetic and electromagnetic interferences.
With reference to
In this embodiment, the electronics is based on a signal amplitude demodulation. The signal output will be of the same frequency as generated by the oscillator and the inductor LG. When no mechanical forces are applied to the ferro magnetic test object then there will be no alternating signal at the sensor output. The more mechanical forces (of the correct type in correspondence with the orientation of the force measuring device with respect to the test object, see
When applying an AC signal of a certain frequency and when using all four magnetic field sensors, then the output signal of the force measuring device 10 is compensated for unwanted magnetic interferences like the earth magnetic field, uniform magnetic stray fields, and electromagnetic interference (EMI) caused by solenoid powered actuators, for example.
The signals of the opposite placed magnetic field sensors are summed-up first as this will eliminate uniform magnetic interferences (as caused by the earth magnetic field or by active solenoids and electric motors, for example). The signals from the two adders 40A, 40B will then be passed-on to a signal processing unit 30 with a differential amplifier. The output of the differential amplifier is then a representation of the mechanical stresses applied to the test object.
Each of the first and second recess 160, 170 has a width 162, 172 which is substantially uniform from one side to the opposite side and also from the bottom to the top, i.e., from the end faces of the poles to the base plate. The width 162, 172 may be between 0.5 mm and 1 mm, for example.
For the sake of brevity, only one magnetic field sensor 330 is shown. However, it is noted that the remarks relating thereto apply in a similar manner to the remaining sensors (not shown). The magnetic field sensor 330 has a width 332 (effective sensing width) that is smaller or equal to the width 162 of the recess it faces. This applies independently of the orientation of the sensor 330, i.e., be it arranged such that it faces the surface of the test object or the recess, see
A lateral spacing 334 between the sensor 330 and the circumference of the flux concentrator (actually the outer surface of the coil wound around the flux concentrator) is provided. The lateral spacing may be 0 (that is, the sensor is arranged at the coil wound around the flux concentrator) or larger (e.g., between 0.2 mm and 1 mm).
The force measuring device 10 described herein is a non-contact mechanical force sensor responding to mechanical stresses in ferro-magnetic test objects. It can be used to measure any mechanical forces like torque, bending, or axial load. The force measuring device may rest upon the surface of the test object or there can be a gap of several millimeters. The device is insensitive to rotational or lateral movement of the test object and also insensitive to oil, water, dust, and other substances that may surround the test object of the force measuring device.
While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the foregoing detailed description, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations exist. It should also be appreciated that the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments are only examples, and are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the disclosure in any way. Rather, the foregoing detailed description will provide those skilled in the art with a convenient road map for implementing the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments. It should be understood that various changes can be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the scope of the disclosure as set forth in the appended claims and the legal equivalents thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
16186445.9 | Aug 2016 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/001029 | 8/30/2017 | WO | 00 |