The invention relates to a force measuring system with at least two load cells that detect the partial forces of the force to be measured and that convert them into a digital output signal. The force measuring system further has an electronic circuit that uses the output signals of the individual load cells to calculate a total signal that depends on the magnitude of the force to be measured. It transmits this signal to another electronic unit for further processing or data output.
EP 319 202 B1 discloses a weighing scale with multiple load cells in which the electronic circuit, which calculates the total signal and transmits it to the downstream electronic unit, is accommodated in a so-called junction box. The individual load cells are connected with the junction box in a star shape, and the total signal as the output signal of the junction box is supplied to the downstream electronic unit via a separate connecting line.
The use of a separate junction box, however, results in additional hardware complexity.
The circuit that calculates the total signal and transmits it to the electronic unit connected downstream can also be integrated in the downstream electronic unit. In this case, however, program parts and/or circuit elements, which are required to calculate the total signal, are located in the downstream electronic unit. As a result, the clear separation of the functions, “determining the force measurement result” on the one hand and “further customer-specific processing of this measurement result” on the other, is no longer provided. This separation is important, for example, for the ability to verify the individual steps, for questions of the calibratability of the measurement result or for extensive processing algorithms that differ for different customers.
Thus, an object of the invention is to further develop a force measuring system, such that a clear separation between determining the measurement result and the subsequent processing of this measurement result is achieved with minimum complexity.
According to the invention, this object is attained by integrating the electronic circuit, which calculates the total signal and transmits it to another or a separate downstream electronic unit, in at least one load cell.
With this integration, the separate junction box is completely eliminated. Since the individual load cells have a microprocessor in any case, which performs the analog to digital conversion, the temperature compensation, etc., the program of this microprocessor needs to be expanded only by the program to form the total signal. This may require a microprocessor with a larger memory in some cases, but often the existing memory is sufficient for the additional program parts, so that integrating this additional function does not involve any additional hardware costs. In this case, in particular, it is advantageous to integrate the electronic circuit for calculating the total signal and transmitting it to the downstream electronic unit in each load cell. As a result, the parts are identical and there is no need to distinguish between different load cell types in design or assembly or in the event that a replacement is required because of a fault.
Other advantageous embodiments are disclosed herein. It should be noted, in particular, that it is also possible to construct a scale from a force measuring system with at least three load cells on which a common weighing platform is supported.
The invention will now be described with reference to the schematic figures, in which:
In the embodiments described herein, the force measuring system is depicted with three load cells. Force measuring systems in accordance with the invention and having two load cells or with four or more load cells are also contemplated and would be constructed in a similar manner to achieve the desired objectives of the invention.
The force measuring system depicted in
In the development and testing of the force measuring system, there is consequently a clear separation of responsibilities: The measuring system manufacturer is responsible for the load cells 1 and 2, the electronic circuit 5 and the internal communication between the load cells, and transmittal of the finished total signal representing the quantity of the force to be measured to the downstream electronic unit 3, which falls entirely within the responsibility of the user.
The separation between the actual load cell 2 and the electronic circuit 5, which is indicated in the figure by the dashed line, is of course only a graphical way to represent the different functions. In general, one and the same microprocessor will perform both types of functions: the functions of the actual load cell, e.g., controlling the analog to digital conversion, the temperature compensation, scaling, etc., and the calculation and control functions of the electronic circuit 5, which calculates the total signal and transmits it to the downstream electronic unit 3. Frequently, the microprocessor, which is present in the load cell in any case, will be powerful enough to assume these additional tasks without hardware expansion. In this case, the load cells 1 and 2 do not differ from one another; the load cell 2 merely has a more extensive program stored in it. It is also possible, however, that the microprocessor of the load cell 2 must be a size larger or have a larger memory area or be expanded by an additional memory component.
A third embodiment of the force measuring system is shown in
The embodiment depicted in
The fifth embodiment of the force measuring system depicted in
If, in a force measuring system for a seat in accordance with
Likewise, in a weighing scale according to
In special applications, the downstream electronic unit 3 can of course also resort to the output signals of the individual load cells. This presents no problem particularly in the embodiments 1 to 3, since the entire communication takes place over the common bus system 4.
The above description of the preferred embodiments has been given by way of example. From the disclosure given, those skilled in the art will not only understand the present invention and its attendant advantages, but will also find apparent various changes and modifications to the disclosed structures and methods of implementing such structures. It is sought, therefore, to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims, and equivalents thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102 21 628 | May 2002 | DE | national |
This is a Continuation of International Application PCT/EP03/04385, with an international filing date of Apr. 26, 2003, which was published under PCT Article 21(2) in German, and the disclosure of which is incorporated into this application by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4502555 | Gower | Mar 1985 | A |
4815547 | Dillon et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5004058 | Langford et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5623128 | Grimm et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5750937 | Johnson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5841077 | Kolaci | Nov 1998 | A |
6070115 | Oestreicher et al. | May 2000 | A |
6242701 | Breed et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6282473 | Steffens, Jr. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6576849 | Bliss et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6919516 | Frye et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
20010010424 | Osmer et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010054516 | Breed et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20040026135 | Huitt et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050027418 | Murphy | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
44 17 228 | Nov 1995 | DE |
0 319 176 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0 319 202 | Jun 1989 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050121236 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP03/04385 | Apr 2003 | US |
Child | 10985980 | US |