The present invention relates generally to a man/machine interface and, more specifically, to a force reflecting haptic interface.
Force reflecting haptic interfaces and associated computer hardware and software are used in a variety of systems to provide tactile sensory feedback to a user in addition to conventional visual feedback, thereby affording an enhanced man/machine interface. These systems are becoming more prevalent in such diverse areas as surgical technique training, industrial design and modeling, and personal entertainment.
Two examples of haptic interfaces for use in a desktop environment are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,587,937 and 6,417,638, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Generally, haptic interfaces define a user reference point located, for example, proximate or within a volume of a user connection element such as a finger thimble or stylus configured to be donned or grasped by a user. Disposed between the user connection element and a spatial or reference ground are a series of mechanical transmission elements such as gimbals, linkages, and frames configured to permit substantially unrestricted movement of the connection element within a predetermined work volume of the haptic interface when in an unpowered state.
Based on the configuration and orientation of the transmission elements, multiple independent degrees of freedom may be provided. Depending on the particular application for the interface, each degree of freedom may be powered and/or tracked, or free, being neither powered nor tracked. For example, a degree of freedom may be powered by a motor or other actuator so that, under appropriate conditions, the interface can resist, balance, or overcome a user input force along that degree of freedom. The powered axis may be active, with force being varied as a function of system conditions, or passive, such as when a constant resistance or drag force is applied. Alternatively or additionally, a degree of freedom can be tracked using an encoder, potentiometer, or other measurement device so that, in combination with other tracked degrees of freedom, the spatial location of the reference point within the work volume can be determined relative to ground. Lastly, a degree of freedom may be free, such that a user is free to move along the degree of freedom substantially without restriction and without tracking within the limits of the range of motion. The interface, in combination with appropriate computer hardware and software, can be used to provide haptic feedback in a virtual reality environment or link a user to an actual manipulator located, for example, in a remote or hazardous environment.
Significant challenges exist in designing a force reflecting haptic interface with appropriate operational and response characteristics. For example, it is desirable that the haptic interface have low friction and weight balance such that a user's movements will not be unduly resisted and the user will not become fatigued merely by moving the connection element within the work volume. It is also desirable that the haptic interface have a high degree of resolution and be highly responsive so as to replicate, as closely as possible, an actual haptic experience. Compact size, low cost, and the interchangeability of various input interfaces are also beneficial attributes from the standpoint of commercial acceptance and appeal.
Nevertheless, the complex technology involved in a force reflecting haptic interface has hampered efforts to reduce size and cost. The architecture of such a device requires unit sizes that are larger than desirable, often because of such factors as motor placement, weight counter-balancing measures, and component size characteristics. Such large unit sizes often drive commercial costs higher, as do the unique components that are required in such a device. The complex technology has also limited the interchangeability of input interfaces, thus requiring the acquisition of a custom device with a specific input interface for each different application.
These limitations on size and cost are presently an unfortunate bar to many markets to which a force reflecting haptic interface is well-suited. For example, lower cost would make such an interface available to consumers, for use with their home personal computers. Use of a haptic interface as a peripheral device would effectively widen the bandwidth of human interaction with the computer, by providing an interface that incorporates a sense of touch, well beyond the standard two-dimensional interaction of sight and sound.
There is, therefore, a need for a force reflecting haptic interface with enhanced functionality that is compact in size and of relatively low cost, so as to be available to a broad consumer market.
In one aspect, the invention relates to a force reflecting haptic interface including at least three degrees of freedom and a user interface. The user interface includes a nose section and a user connection section detachably coupled to the nose section. The nose section is interchangeable with alternative user connection sections.
In various embodiments of the foregoing aspect of the invention, the user connection section can be a stylus, a pistol grip, a roller ball, a mouse, a joystick, and/or a steering device. In addition, the user connection section can be coupled to the nose section by a jack and chuck arrangement and the user connection section can decouple from the nose section upon application of a load greater than a threshold load value.
In some embodiments, the user interface further includes a first user input and, optionally, a second user input. In additional embodiments, the first user input and/or the second user input is customizable by a user. The user input can be a switch or push-button. Either the first user input or the second user input or both can modify a function of the user interface. In various embodiments, the user interface is adapted to function as a force feedback device, a computer mouse, and/or a digitizer.
The user interface includes a housing. In one embodiment, the housing is made up of multiple components that interlock so as to provide structural integrity and component retention without requiring a fastener. Additionally, the force reflecting haptic interface can include a yoke assembly coupled to the nose section of the user interface. In one embodiment, the yoke assembly includes two hinged halves adapted to capture a pair of projections extending from the nose section. Each projection is adapted to mate with a bearing and at least one of the projections is adapted to mate with a sensor for outputting a signal representative of a position of the user interface relative to the yoke assembly.
In further embodiments, the user interface includes a sensor for outputting a signal representative of a position of the user connection section relative to the nose section. In addition, the user interface may include a docking station. The docking station includes a projection disposed on one of the user interface and a housing of the haptic interface and a mating recess formed in the other of the user interface and the housing. Further, the docking station may include a sensor for indicating mating of the projection in the recess. In another aspect, the invention relates to a force reflecting haptic interface including at least three degrees of freedom and a multiple use user interface. The user interface is adapted to support a first function and a second function. In one embodiment, the user interface is further adapted to support a third function. In various embodiments of this aspect of the invention, the first function is as a force feedback device, the second function is as a computer mouse, and the third function is as a digitizer. In one embodiment, the user interface is switchable between the first function and the second function, and the third function is enabled independently from the first function and the second function.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a docking station for a force reflecting haptic interface including a housing and a user interface. The docking station includes a mating structure and a switch disposed proximate the mating structure. In some embodiments, the mating structure includes a receptacle formed in the housing and the switch is actuatable by insertion of at least a portion of the user interface into the receptacle. Upon actuation of the switch, the haptic interface is set to a home position.
In further embodiments, the docking station includes a retainer for retaining the user interface in the docking station, and the retainer can include a spring loaded projection disposed on one of the user interface and the docking station and a mating recess for receiving the projection disposed on the other of the user interface and the docking station. In addition, the docking station can include an indicator. The indicator can be a visual indicator and can indicate at least one of a fault condition and a status.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a force reflecting haptic interface including at least three degrees of freedom. The haptic interface includes a direct drive assembly having a first actuator for driving a first rotary element and a coaxial transfer drive assembly having a second actuator for driving a second rotary element. The direct drive assembly and the transfer drive assembly are disposed on opposite sides of at least one of the first rotary element and the second rotary element.
In various embodiments of the foregoing aspect of the invention, the direct drive assembly and the transfer drive assembly each include a rotary element or other type of drive element, the respective rotary elements disposed in an opposed coaxial configuration. The force reflecting haptic interface can further include a reflective encoder disposed on one end of at least one of the first actuator and the second actuator and/or a threaded capstan disposed on a shaft of at least one of the first actuator and the second actuator.
In one embodiment, the force reflecting haptic interface includes a base for housing electrical components. The base can include ballast to at least partially, and typically fully, offset forces arising during use of the haptic interface. In one embodiment, the ballast can include a plurality of plates. Further, the force reflecting haptic interface can include an electrical interface in accordance with IEEE 1394. In some embodiments, the force reflecting haptic interface includes an external non-structural housing, wherein the housing can include two halves mounted in opposition on a shaft passing through an axis of rotation of a rotary element. In various embodiments, the force reflecting haptic interface includes a spring for balancing at least one cantilevered rotary element without requiring a counterweight. The spring may be a torsion spring disposed about an axis of rotation of the rotary element.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a force reflecting haptic interface including at least three degrees of freedom and an internal temperature monitoring system without requiring a temperature sensor. In one embodiment, the temperature monitoring system includes circuitry for measuring duration and magnitude of current drawn by an actuator powering at least one of the degrees of freedom. Further, the system calculates a temperature inside the interface based on the measured duration and magnitude. In one embodiment, the system disables at least a portion of the interface if the calculated temperature exceeds a threshold temperature value.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a method of monitoring an internal temperature of a force reflecting haptic interface. The method includes the steps of measuring magnitude of current drawn by an actuator within the interface, measuring duration of the current drawn, and calculating a temperature based upon the magnitude and duration measurements. In one embodiment, the method includes an additional step of disabling at least a portion of the interface if the calculated temperature exceeds a threshold temperature value.
These and other objects, along with advantages and features of the present invention herein disclosed, will become apparent through reference to the following description, the accompanying drawings, and the claims. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the features of the various embodiments described herein are not mutually exclusive and can exist in various combinations and permutations.
In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the following description, various embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the following drawings, in which:
In the embodiment shown in
The nose housing 68 and stylus housing 62 meet at or near the compression ring 64. In one embodiment (as shown in
Turning now to
Referring to
Contained partially within the nose housing 68 is the connector shaft 90. The distal end of the shaft 90 is a conical connector 96 that serves as the joining element between the nose 34 and stylus 40. In one embodiment, a conical connector similar to an audio device jack is employed, but diamond, tapered cylinder, and other non-conical shapes also may be used, provided they mechanically interlock with the snap-type connection 80 in the stylus 40. A guide 98 extends radially outward from the connector shaft 90 and is sized to mate with the groove 84 on the stylus 40. The connector shaft 90 is supported by at least one set of bearings 88, which allows for low-friction rotation of the shaft 90 within the housing 68. Ball, needle, roller, or other types of bearings may be used. A potentiometer retainer 100 also prevents non-rotational motion of the shaft 90, by securing the bearings 88, as well as a potentiometer 104. Generally, potentiometers are of the type that employ a floating central disk, similar to those of the 251 Series, manufactured by CTS Corp., are used in the haptic interface 10, although other sensors for outputting a signal representative of position may be employed. At a location within the housing 68, a potentiometer blade 102 joins the connector shaft 90 at or near its terminus. A plurality of wires (not visible) exit the potentiometer 104 and are routed via the interior portions of the nose 34, yoke 36, shin 30, and thigh 24 to the computer boards within the base 12 of the haptic interface 10. Finally, the digitizing tip 76 is secured within the tapered end of the housing 68.
As a user grips and rotates the stylus 40, the rotational force is directed via the groove 84 to the guide 98. As the guide 98 is a part of the connector shaft 90, the shaft rotates about the F axis. This movement of the connector shaft 90 rotates the potentiometer blade 102, which in turn drives the potentiometer 104. Electronic output signals are then directed through the wiring back to the computer boards of the haptic interface 10.
Turning now to
As a user manipulates the stylus 40, certain forces are transferred to the nose 34, causing the projections 70 to rotate within the bearings 120 of the yoke 36. This movement of the projections 70 in turn rotates the potentiometer blade 72 about the E axis, which drives the potentiometer 130. Electronic output signals are then directed through the wiring back to the computer boards of the haptic interface 10. Similarly, as the user manipulates the stylus 40, certain forces are transmitted via the nose 34 and projections 70 to the yoke 36, causing the yoke 36 to rotate. As the yoke 36 is joined to the yoke shaft 122, the shaft 122 rotates about the D axis. This movement of the yoke shaft 122 rotates the potentiometer blade 126, which in turn drives the potentiometer 136. Electronic output signals are then directed through the wiring back to the computer boards of the haptic interface 10.
Now referencing
Both the second powered tracked rotary element 18 and the rotary transfer drive element 164 operate in a manner similar to that of the first powered tracked rotary element 14. For a more detailed description of the second motor assembly 501 and its operation, refer to
The orientations of the second powered tracked rotary element 18 and rotary transfer drive element 164 and their associated motor assemblies 501, 601 allow for a very compact configuration and a reduction in overall size of the haptic interface 10. As can be seen from
The particular embodiment of the haptic interface 10 shown in
Accordingly, the second transfer drive rod 168b is directly grounded through looped cable ends to each of the transfer drive shaft 166 and the third rotary element 22; whereas, the first drive rod 168a is directly grounded through a looped cable end to a raised ground tab 167 of the third rotary element 22 and indirectly grounded with a single cable to the transfer drive shaft through a clutch post 757 (
In
In an embodiment of the haptic interface 10, the emitter/detector 307 is a single unit mounted at the end of the actuator 303, directing pulses to, and receiving pulses from, the reflective encoder disk 309. As the actuator 303 causes the disk 309 to rotate, or as the disk 309 rotates due to user movement of the manipulation device 10, the emitter/detector 307 outputs pulses that are in turn reflected by the disk 309, allowing the angular orientation of the articulation to be determined. Three of these actuator assemblies 301 are used in the haptic interface 10, one for each of the powered articulations 16, 20, 26; however, more or less actuator assemblies may be employed depending on the number of powered axes.
The actuator assembly 301 uses components readily available in the market. In one embodiment, the actuator 303 is a D.C. motor. Generally, a reflective encoder disk similar to the 8000 Series manufactured by Agilent Technologies is utilized. The capstan 313 and reflective encoder disk 309 may be secured to the actuator shaft 311a and extension 311b by a variety of means, such as mechanical connections or press fit connections employing heat expansion and cooling. In a particular embodiment of the present invention, however, the capstan 313 and disk 309 are secured using a strong bonding adhesive, such as one marketed under the name Loctite®, manufactured by Henkel Consumer Adhesives, Inc., to reduce the overall size of the assembly 301.
Instead of using mechanical linkages, gears, or other force transmission components, the interface 10 employs three dedicated actuators (described above) fitted with capstans and corresponding cables to power rotary axes A-C. Cable drives provide good force transmission characteristics with low weight; however, backlash can be a problem, especially in high precision, high resolution haptic interfaces. Backlash or play in a rotary mechanical transmission, such as those employed in the interface 10, is most evident when direction of rotation is reversed. One method of reducing backlash is to provide a manual adjustment feature to adjust the position of one or both of the cable ends relative to ground so that slack in the cable can be reduced. Further, the cable can be preloaded in tension so that there is minimal slippage between the cable and the actuator capstan as the capstan rotates; however, as the cable stretches and the components of the mechanism wear over time, cable tension is reduced and must be periodically adjusted to prevent slippage. Additionally, cable tension is difficult to measure and excessive tensioning can lead to deformation of the structural elements and accelerated, premature wear in the articulation bearings.
A non-rotating post, such as the clutch post 357, may be used to amplify or multiply an applied cable tension to resist or offset tension applied to the cable 353 downstream of the post 357. As is known by those skilled in the art, the amplification factor is a function of post diameter, wrap angle of the cable around the post, and the coefficient of friction between the cable and the post. Accordingly, for a given spring tension, as wrap angle and/or friction increases, a larger downstream cable force can be offset or resisted.
In a static state, the tension induced in the cable 353 by the spring 359 causes the cable 353 to be pulled to the right, eliminating any slack or looseness in the cable 353, cable tension being a function of the spring constant, k, and the linear displacement, x, of the spring ends from a rest state. In operation, as the actuator capstan 313 rotates in a clockwise direction, as depicted, tension is applied to the portion of the cable 353 between the capstan 313 and ground 355a and the capstan 313 moves to the left relative to ground 355a. Any looseness or slack in the cable 353 to the right of the capstan 313 is automatically taken up by the spring 359, the cable 353 sliding around the clutch post 357 whenever the spring force overcomes the frictional drag of the cable 353 around the clutch post 357.
Alternatively, when the capstan 313 rotates in a counter-clockwise direction, the capstan 313 applies tension to the cable 353 portion between the capstan 313 and the clutch post 357. As long as the spring tension enhanced by the clutch post effect exceeds the tension induced by the capstan 313, the cable 353 will be effectively locked to the clutch post 357 and will not slip around the post 357. The spring 359 will be effectively isolated from the capstan loading. Accordingly, the tensioning device 351 automatically self-adjusts and maintains cable tension at a predetermined magnitude, taking up any slack when the capstan 313 rotates in a first direction and locking when the capstan 313 rotates in a second direction.
Referring to
Turning now to
As can be seen in
Turning now to
In one embodiment of the haptic interface 10, the second rotary element 18 is penetrated by at least two control wire conduits 563a, 563b. These conduits 563a, 563b provide a location for the power and control wiring and generally restrict the wires movement as the element 18 rotates. The rotary element 18 rotates about a centrally located B axis shaft that may be smooth, include grooves or tabs, or be threaded as required. As an alternative to the D-shaped element shown in the
Similarly, in
The rotary transfer drive element 164 rotates freely about axis B. Rotational force is transferred to third articulation 26 by transfer drive shaft 166 and associated components depicted in more detail in
During use of the haptic interface 10, the three powered tracked rotary elements 14, 18, and 22 may be either “powered” or “free.” When powered, the actuators are energized and can control the rotation of the respective rotary elements, directing the elements to either resist or force the movements of the interface user depending on the application. This powered setting is useful for force feedback situations, such as simulating surgical techniques, providing feedback during computer game play, etc. In the free setting, the actuators are not energized and the rotary elements are subject to the forces of the interface user. Such a setting is useful for digitizing drawings or objects directly into a computer program, using the user interface as a personal computer mouse, drafting computer-aided design (CAD) images, etc. Any number of the three rotary elements may be in either powered or free mode for any particular application, or may switch between the two modes when certain criteria are met.
Light weight, low cost, high stiffness, and high strength are preferred characteristics for the moveable portions of the haptic interface. For these reasons, injection molded 40% carbon fiber filled nylon or similar compositions may be selected for the structural elements such as second element 18, second element extension 24, third element 22, third element extension 30, fifth element 34, and sixth element 40. Other glass and carbon fiber filled, injection molded plastics may be used as well. Moreover, in one embodiment, the external gripping surfaces of the stylus housing 62 are treated with an anti-slip coating or paint to prevent the stylus 40 from slipping from the user's grasp. Alternatively, the external surfaces may be physically textured or knurled as required. In one embodiment, the haptic interface 10 may be used in conjunction with a wrist rest 700 as depicted in
Temperature sensing devices are required in consumer products to prevent overheating and possible injury to users and to prevent damage to a device's internal components. Generally, thermocouples are used to measure temperatures of internal motors and other components to meet this requirement. One embodiment of the haptic interface 10 in accordance with the present invention, however, uses a computer algorithm to monitor temperature within the device, in the absence of any thermocouple or other sensor that directly reads internal temperature. A flowchart of such an temperature calculating algorithm 810 (a subroutine of control algorithm 800 described above) is depicted in
If the result of the update is an internal temperature less than about 80° C. 814, the force is applied to the rotary element 816. If, however, the internal temperature exceeds about 80° C. 818, the force is disabled 820, and delivery of current to the actuator is terminated. Under the latter condition, the temperature data is cached 822 for application in a temperature error algorithm 830 (described below), and a temperature error message 824 is delivered to the user. This error may take the form of a notation within the associated computer program to be displayed on a computer screen and/or will result in a visible change in the LED in the haptic interface docking station to indicate a system error. The temperature limit can be adjusted, as required, for any given application or to prevent damage to internal device components. A threshold temperature of 49° C., for example, can be set to cause shutdown of the interface 10 before any damage occurs to the actuators or other internal components.
A flowchart for the temperature error algorithm 830 is depicted in
Turning now to
The digital functions 902 of the board 58b communicate with the various electromechanical interface functions 900 and the program host computer 908 via the IEEE 1394 connection 926. Local feedback and safety logic function 918 performs several functions. These include, but are not limited to, velocity based positive feedback to compensate for back-emf of motor and friction, velocity threshold shutdown, current shutdown if threshold exceeded, and watchdog shutdown if not updated within a certain time. Also, a 32-bit read-only serial number interface 920 identifies the haptic interface 10 to the host computer. The digital functions 902 also include 32 bit read-write volatile 922 and non-volatile 924 registers. Additionally, the electronics of the interface may include an 8031 microprocessor, FLASH memory, Programmable Logic Device (PLD) and PLD-based delta sigma A/D converters, and a four-layer printed circuit card.
The microprocessor negotiates with the host computer, manages system initialization and isochronous data transfers during operation, loads the PLD configuration, and manages the FLASH memory read/write operations (to allow remote updates of the 8031 program, the PLD configuration, and system constants). The PLD implements three 16-bit quadrature encoder interfaces, encoder speed detection, power fail and over current safety logic, motor enablement monitoring, 512 byte stack RAM bank to supplement 8031 memory, FIFO interface to IEEE 1394 connection link controller isochronous data mover port, control for three nine-bit accurate delta-sigma potentiometer A/D converters, three ten-bit PWM generators to set motor currents, triangle wave frequency generator, and power supply sync frequency generator. The power board 58a (
While there have been described herein what are to be considered exemplary and preferred embodiments of the present invention, other modifications of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the teachings herein. The particular methods of manufacture and geometries disclosed herein are exemplary in nature and are not to be considered limiting. It is therefore desired to be secured in the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, what is desired to be secured by Letters Patent is the invention as defined and differentiated in the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/697,963, filed Oct. 30, 2003, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2475484 | DeNise | Jul 1949 | A |
2906179 | Bower | Sep 1959 | A |
3133649 | Serrell | May 1964 | A |
3139990 | Jelatis et al. | Jul 1964 | A |
3168203 | Gallistel | Feb 1965 | A |
3171549 | Orloff | Mar 1965 | A |
3241687 | Orloff | Mar 1966 | A |
3263824 | Jones et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3269826 | Bumgarner | Aug 1966 | A |
3296882 | Durand | Jan 1967 | A |
3350956 | Monge | Nov 1967 | A |
3409252 | Miller | Nov 1968 | A |
3447766 | Palfreyman | Jun 1969 | A |
3449008 | Colechia | Jun 1969 | A |
3531868 | Stevenson | Oct 1970 | A |
3561263 | Ward et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3618742 | Blanchard et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3618786 | Fick | Nov 1971 | A |
3620095 | Dane | Nov 1971 | A |
3629826 | Cutaia et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3637092 | George et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3679865 | Jesnitzer et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3771037 | Bailey, Jr. | Nov 1973 | A |
3890958 | Fister et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3919691 | Noll | Nov 1975 | A |
3920972 | Corwin, Jr. et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3944798 | Eaton | Mar 1976 | A |
3948093 | Folchi et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4021715 | Von Hacht et al. | May 1977 | A |
4062455 | Flatau | Dec 1977 | A |
4150803 | Fernandez | Apr 1979 | A |
4216467 | Colston | Aug 1980 | A |
4221516 | Haaker et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4229136 | Panissidi | Oct 1980 | A |
4260319 | Motoda et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4302138 | Zarudiansky | Nov 1981 | A |
4318096 | Thornburg et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4348142 | Figour | Sep 1982 | A |
4367532 | Crum et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4420808 | Diamond et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4459870 | Gill et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4477973 | Davies | Oct 1984 | A |
4510574 | Guittet et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4511985 | Inaba et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4521685 | Rebman | Jun 1985 | A |
4530155 | Burkhardt et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4531080 | Nordstrom et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4555960 | King et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4571834 | Fraser et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4593470 | Davies | Jun 1986 | A |
4604016 | Joyce | Aug 1986 | A |
4632341 | Repperger et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4638798 | Shelden et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4648782 | Kraft | Mar 1987 | A |
4653011 | Iwano et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4654648 | Herrington et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4655673 | Hawkes | Apr 1987 | A |
4660288 | Dangschat et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4661032 | Arai et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4670851 | Murakami et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4676002 | Slocum | Jun 1987 | A |
4679331 | Koontz | Jul 1987 | A |
4680519 | Chand et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4702668 | Carlisle et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4703443 | Moriyasu et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4750487 | Zanetti | Jun 1988 | A |
4769763 | Trieb et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4787051 | Olson | Nov 1988 | A |
4791934 | Brunnett | Dec 1988 | A |
4795296 | Jau | Jan 1989 | A |
4800721 | Cemenska et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4806066 | Rhodes et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4819195 | Bell et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4823634 | Culver | Apr 1989 | A |
4837734 | Ichikawa et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4839838 | LaBiche et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4849692 | Blood | Jul 1989 | A |
4853874 | Iwamoto et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4875177 | Jarman | Oct 1989 | A |
4879556 | Duimel et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4887222 | Miyake et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4888538 | Dimitrov et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4888877 | Enderle et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4891889 | Tomelleri et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4893981 | Yoshinada et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4895039 | Hegg | Jan 1990 | A |
4907970 | Meenen, Jr. | Mar 1990 | A |
4907973 | Hon | Mar 1990 | A |
4913000 | Wyllie | Apr 1990 | A |
4914976 | Wyllie | Apr 1990 | A |
4942538 | Yuan et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4942545 | Sapia | Jul 1990 | A |
4945305 | Blood | Jul 1990 | A |
4945501 | Bell et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4961138 | Gorniak | Oct 1990 | A |
4962448 | DeMaio et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4962591 | Zeller et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4973215 | Karlen et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4978846 | Buote | Dec 1990 | A |
4982504 | Soderberg et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4987301 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4988981 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5004391 | Burdea | Apr 1991 | A |
5007085 | Greanias et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5007300 | Siva et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5018922 | Yoshinada et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019761 | Kraft | May 1991 | A |
5024116 | Kraft | Jun 1991 | A |
5038089 | Szakaly | Aug 1991 | A |
5039254 | Piercy | Aug 1991 | A |
5040306 | McMurtry et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5044956 | Behensky et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5050608 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053975 | Tsuchihashi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5053976 | Nose et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5072361 | Davis et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5088046 | McMurtry et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5088055 | Oyama et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5095303 | Clark et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5103404 | McIntosh | Apr 1992 | A |
5105367 | Tsuchihashi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5115178 | Umeda et al. | May 1992 | A |
5116051 | Moncrief et al. | May 1992 | A |
5116180 | Fung et al. | May 1992 | A |
5128671 | Thomas, Jr. | Jul 1992 | A |
5130632 | Ezawa et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5131844 | Marinaccio et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5132672 | Clark | Jul 1992 | A |
5139261 | Openiano | Aug 1992 | A |
5142506 | Edwards | Aug 1992 | A |
5142931 | Menahem | Sep 1992 | A |
5143505 | Burdea et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5148377 | McDonald et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5155423 | Karlen et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5177563 | Everett et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5181181 | Glynn | Jan 1993 | A |
5184319 | Kramer | Feb 1993 | A |
5185561 | Good et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5187874 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5189806 | McMurtry et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5193963 | McAffee et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5194792 | Hara et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5198736 | Azuma et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5204824 | Fujimaki et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5220260 | Schuler | Jun 1993 | A |
5220261 | Kempas et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5223776 | Radke et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230623 | Guthrie et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239160 | Sakura et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239246 | Kim | Aug 1993 | A |
5251127 | Raab | Oct 1993 | A |
5251156 | Heier et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5255211 | Redmond | Oct 1993 | A |
5259120 | Chapman et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5264768 | Gregory et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5266875 | Slotine et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5275565 | Moncrief | Jan 1994 | A |
5320623 | Pennig et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5350033 | Kraft | Sep 1994 | A |
5351692 | Dow et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354162 | Burdea et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5379663 | Hara et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5382885 | Salcudean et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5384460 | Tseng et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5384688 | Rockwell | Jan 1995 | A |
5389865 | Jacobus et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396265 | Ulrich et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5397323 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402582 | Raab | Apr 1995 | A |
5414337 | Schuler | May 1995 | A |
5417696 | Kashuba et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418442 | Araki et al. | May 1995 | A |
5429140 | Burdea et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436542 | Petelin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5438529 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445166 | Taylor | Aug 1995 | A |
5459382 | Jacobus et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467763 | McMahon et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5482051 | Reddy et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489830 | Fernandez | Feb 1996 | A |
5497452 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5515078 | Greschler et al. | May 1996 | A |
5516249 | Brimhall | May 1996 | A |
5555894 | Doyama et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559412 | Schuler | Sep 1996 | A |
5576727 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577417 | Fournier et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5587937 | Massie et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589828 | Armstrong | Dec 1996 | A |
5589854 | Tsai et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
D377932 | Schena et al. | Feb 1997 | S |
5623582 | Rosenberg | Apr 1997 | A |
5625576 | Massie et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629594 | Jacobus et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642469 | Hannaford et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5666138 | Culver | Sep 1997 | A |
5691898 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694013 | Stewart et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701140 | Rosenberg et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706028 | Murakami et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5721566 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724264 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731804 | Rosenberg | Mar 1998 | A |
5734373 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737505 | Shaw et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739811 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742278 | Chen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751289 | Myers | May 1998 | A |
5754023 | Roston et al. | May 1998 | A |
5767839 | Rosenberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5769640 | Jacobus et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771181 | Moore et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774130 | Horikawa et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784542 | Ohm et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790108 | Salcudean et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792135 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797900 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798752 | Buxton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800177 | Gillio | Sep 1998 | A |
5800178 | Gillio | Sep 1998 | A |
5800179 | Bailey | Sep 1998 | A |
5802353 | Avila et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5803738 | Latham | Sep 1998 | A |
5805140 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807377 | Madhani et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808665 | Green | Sep 1998 | A |
5814038 | Jensen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5816105 | Adelstein | Oct 1998 | A |
5816823 | Naimark et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821920 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825308 | Rosenberg | Oct 1998 | A |
5825983 | Park et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828197 | Martin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828813 | Ohm | Oct 1998 | A |
5831408 | Jacobus et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844392 | Peurach et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847528 | Hui et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854843 | Jacknin et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857986 | Moriyasu | Jan 1999 | A |
5859934 | Green | Jan 1999 | A |
5872438 | Roston | Feb 1999 | A |
5880714 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889670 | Schuler et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5898599 | Massie et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907229 | Snell et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907487 | Rosenberg et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910719 | Thorne | Jun 1999 | A |
5913727 | Ahdoot | Jun 1999 | A |
5914705 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923318 | Zhai et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929584 | Gunnarsson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929607 | Rosenberg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929846 | Rosenberg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5945978 | Holmes et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5952796 | Colgate et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5952806 | Muramatsu et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956484 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5976122 | Madhani et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6020875 | Moore et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6078876 | Rosenberg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6104382 | Martin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111577 | Zilles et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6125337 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126373 | Yee et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6134506 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6162191 | Foxlin | Dec 2000 | A |
6166723 | Schena et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6184868 | Shahoian et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191365 | Avellanet | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203614 | Cherko | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219032 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219589 | Faraz et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6239784 | Holmes et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6252579 | Rosenberg et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6271833 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281651 | Haanpaa et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6342880 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6344848 | Rowe et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346072 | Cooper | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353850 | Wies et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371952 | Madhani et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384814 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405158 | Massie et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411276 | Braun et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417638 | Guy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429846 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6448977 | Braun et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465772 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476377 | Hodge | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6529183 | MacLean et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6627870 | Lapstun et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6879315 | Guy et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6985133 | Rodomista et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
20010002098 | Haanpaa et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010020200 | Das et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020021283 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020063685 | Rosenberg et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020097223 | Rosenberg | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105503 | Oueslati et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126432 | Goldenberg et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140673 | Tanaka | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163498 | Chang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040155862 | Higginson | Aug 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 458 343 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0 493 795 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0 875 819 | Apr 1998 | EP |
WO-9502801 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO-9616397 | May 1996 | WO |
WO-9622591 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO-9642078 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO-9706410 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO-9712337 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO-9712357 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO-9719440 | May 1997 | WO |
WO-9721160 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO-9744775 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-9806024 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO-9826342 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO-9830951 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO-9858308 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-9858323 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-9910872 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO-2005034748 | Sep 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 5,903,456, 5/1999, Schena et al. (withdrawn). |
Adachi, Y., “Touch and Trace on the Free-Form Surface of Virtual Object,” Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, Sep. 18-22, 1993, Seattle WA, pp. 162-168. |
Alper, J., “New Interface Makes Virtual World Tangible,” Science Magazine, vol. 283, Feb. 19, 1999; pp. 1097-1098. |
Atkinson et al., “Computing with Feeling,” Comput. & Graphics, vol. 2, 1977, pp. 97-103. |
Baird Industries web page at www.alanbaird.com/index.html, 2000. |
Barr, Alan H.; “Global and Local Deformations of Solid Primitives,” Computer Graphics; vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 21-30 (Jul. 1984). |
Baumann et al., “Haptic Interface for Virtual Reality Based Minimally Invasive Surgery Simulation,” Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1998, vol. 1, pp. 381-386. |
Bergamasco, M., “Design of Hand Force Feedback Systems for Glove-like Advanced Interfaces”; Proceedings from the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication; Sep. 1992; pp. 286-293. |
BioRobotics Lab Home Page, “Mini Direct-Drive Robot,” http://rcs.ee.washington.edu/BRL/devises/mrobot/, 4 pages, 2001. |
Blinn, J.F., “Simulation of Wrinkled Surfaces,” Computer Graphics, vol. 12-3, Aug. 1978, pp. 286-292. |
Brooks, Jr. et al., “Project GROPE—Haptic Displays for Scientific Visualization,” Computer Graphics, vol. 24, No. 4, Aug. 1990, pp. 177-185. |
Burdea, G.C., “Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality,” Wiley-Interscience Publication, pp. 190-193, (1996). |
Colgate et al., “Implementation of Stiff Virtual Walls in Force-Reflecting Interfaces,” Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, pp. 202-208, Sep. 1993. |
Decaudin, P., “Geometric Deformation by Merging a 3D-Object with a Simple Shape,” Graphics Interface Proceedings, May 21-24, 1996, Toronto, Canada. |
Dworkin et al., “A New Model for Efficient Dynamic Simulation,” Fourth Eurographics Animation and Simulation Workshop Proceedings Eurographic Technical Report Series, ISSN 1017-4656, Sep. 4-5, 1993, pp. 135-147. |
Faraz et al., “Design of Haptic Interface Through Stiffness Modulation for Endosurgery: Theory and Experiments,” Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 1998, vol. 2, pp. 1007-1012. |
Galyean et al., “Sculpting: An Interactive Volumetric Modeling Technique,” Computer Graphics, vol. 25, No. 4, Jul. 1991, pp. 267-274. |
Hashimoto et al., “Dynamic Force Simulator for Force Feedback Human-Machine Interaction,” IEEE, Sep. 1993, pp. 209-215. |
Hasser et al., “Tactile Feedback with Adaptive Controller for a Force-Reflecting Haptic Display, Part 1: Design,” Proceedings of the 1996 15th Southern Biomedical engineering Conference, 1996, pp. 526-529. |
Hayward et al., “Freedom-7: A High Fidelity Seven Axis Haptic Device with Application to Surgical Training,” Draft Paper: Reprints of ISER 1997. |
Hirata et al., “3-Dimensional Interface Device for Virtual Work Space,” Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Jul. 7-10, 1992, pp. 889-896. |
Hirota et al., “Development of Surface Display,” Department of Mechano-Informatics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo, pp. 256-262, 1993. |
Howe et al., “Task Performance with a Dextrous Teleoperated Hand System,” Telemanipulator Technology, Nov. 1992, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 1833, pp. 1-9. |
Immersion Corporation, “Impulse Engine,” at http://www.immerse.com, 1997. |
Immersion Corporation, “Impulse Engine,” Marketing Brochure, 1997. |
Immersion Corporation, “Laparoscopic Impulse Engine,” at http://www.immerse.com, 1996. |
Immersion Corporation, “Laparoscopic Impulse Engine,” Marketing Brochure, 1995. |
Inoue et al., “Parallel Manipulator,” Proceedings of 3rd Robotics Research: The Third International Symposium, Faugeras & Giralt, eds., MIT Press 1986; pp. 321-327. |
Ishii et al., “A 3D Interface Device with Force Feedback: A Virtual Work Space for Pick-and-Place Tasks,” Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium; pp. 331-335, Sep. 1993. |
Iwata, “Artificial Reality with Force-feedback: Development of Desktop Virtual Space with Compact Master Manipulator,” Computer Graphics, vol. 24, No. 4, Aug. 1990, pp. 165-170. |
Iwata, “Pen-based Haptic Virtual Environment,” Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, Sep. 18-22, 1993, Seattle, WA, pp. 287-292. |
Kelley et al., “Magic Mouse: Tactile and Kinesthetic Feedback in the Human-Computer Interface Using an Electromagnetically Actuated Input/Output Device,” Department of Electrical Engineering, University of British Columbia; Oct. 19, 1993, pp. 1-27. |
Kilpatrick, “The Use of a Kinesthetic Supplement in an Interactive Graphics System,” The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Ph.D. Thesis, 1976, pp. 1-175. |
Kim and Schenker, “A Teleoperation Training Simulator with Visual and Kinesthetic Force Virtual Reality,” Proceedings from the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display III, 1992, pp. 560-569. |
Kotoku et al., “A Force Display Algorithm for Virtual Environments,” SICE, pp. 347-355, 1992. |
Kraft Telerobotics, Inc., “GRIPS Force Feedback Manipulator System,” Marketing Brochure. |
Kraft Telerobotics, Inc., “GRIPS Master/Slave Manipulation System,” Marketing Brochure, 1988. |
Kraft Telerobotics, Inc., “GRIPS Underwater Manipulator System,” Marketing Brochure. |
Luecke et al., “Haptic Interaction Using a PUMA 560 and the ISU Force Reflecting Exoskeleton System,” Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1997, vol. 1, pp. 106-111. |
Marcus et al., “EXOS Research on Master Controllers for Robotic Devices,” Fifth Annual Workshop on Space Operations Applications and Research (SOAR '91), pp. 238-245, Jul. 1991. |
Marlow Ropes Web pages: www.marlowropes.co.uk/yachting/halyards.htm,www.marlowropes.co.uk/yachting/construction.htm, Mar. 9, 2001. |
Massie, T., “Design of a Three Degree of Freedom Force-Reflecting Haptic Interface,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Bachelor of Science in Electrical Science and Engineering Thesis, May 1993, pp. 1-38. |
Massie, T., “Initial Haptic Explorations with the Phantom: Virtual Touch Through Point Interaction,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Feb. 1996, pp. 1-49. |
Massie, T., “A Tangible Goal for 3D Modeling, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications,” vol. 18, No. 3, May-Jun. 1998, pp. 62-65. |
McAffee et al., “Teleoperator Subsystem/Telerobot Demonstrator,” Force Reflecting Hand Controller Equipment Manual, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jan. 1988, pp. 3-8, 11, A-34. |
Midwest Tungsten Service web pages, “TungstenWire History,” at www.tungsten.com/tunghist.html, and “tungsten wire for sale,” at www.tungsten.com/resalew.html, Jan. 4, 2002. |
Millman et al., “A System for the Implementation and Kinesthetic Display of Virtual Environments,” SPIE vol. 1833 Telemanipulator Technology, 1992, pp. 49-56. |
Minsky et al., “Feeling and Seeing: Issues in Force Display,” Computer Graphics, vol. 24, No. 2, Mar. 1990, pp. 235-270. |
Monash University Home Page, “2nd Asia Pacific Conference on Systems Integrity and Maintenance On-line course Notes and Lecture Presentations,” www-mec.eng.monash.edu.au/body.html, 9 pages, Feb. 12, 1999. |
MPB Technologies, Inc., “Freedom 6, Force Feedback Hand Controller,” Marketing Brochure. |
NASA MUG Home Page, “Advanced Technology and Mission Studies,” http://ranier.hq.nasa.gov/, 11 pages, Dec. 8, 1997. |
Noll, “Man-Machine Tactile Communication,” Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, Ph.D. Thesis, 1971, pp. 1-89. |
Payne et al., “Distance Field Manipulation of Surface Models,” IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, Jan. 1992, pp. 65-71. |
Robotics Research Group Home Page, “Education Robot Workspace,” www.robotics.utexas.edu/rrg/education/low—education/robot—workspaces/main.htm, 14 pages, Sep. 5, 2001. |
Salcudean and Vlaar, “On the Emulation of Stiff Walls and Static Friction with a Magnetically Levitated Input/Output Device,” DSC-vol. 55-1, Dynamic Systems and Control vol. 1 ASME 1994, pp. 303-309. |
SensAble Devices, Inc., “PHANToM Haptic Interface,” Marketing Brochure, 1995. |
Shimoga, K. B., “A Survey of Perceptual Feedback Issues in Dextrous Telemanipulation: Part I. Finger Force Feedback,” published by IEEE Neural Networks Council in IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, held Sep. 18-22, 1993 in Seattle, Washington, 1993, pp. 263-270. |
Snow et al., “Technical Support Package on Compact Force-Reflecting Hand Controller,” NASA Tech Brief, vol. 15, No. 4 from Jet Propulsion Laboratory Report NPO-17851/7348, Apr. 1991, pp. i, 1-3, 1a-11a, 14a, 15a. |
Sutter et al., “Response to Reflected-Force Feefback to Fingers in Teleoperations,” Proceedings of the NASA Conference on Space Telerobotics, vol. IV, pp. 65-74, NASA JPL, Jan. 1989. |
Tanie et al., “Force Display Algorithms,” 1993 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 2, 1993, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1993, pp. 60-78. |
Terzopoulos et al., “Elastically Deformable Models,” Computer Graphics, vol. 21, No. 4, Jul. 1987, pp. 205-214. |
Yoshikawa et al., “Construction of Virtual World Using Dynamics Modules and Interaction Modules,” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 1996, pp. 2358-2364. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080291161 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10697963 | Oct 2003 | US |
Child | 12169304 | US |