This invention relates to tension mechanisms for needle-thread in a sewing machine.
There are four things which seem to primarily affect the stitch quality: the tension, the needle, whether you have correctly threaded the machine, and the thread. The present invention is concerned with the tension of the thread. In general, the thicker the fabric, higher the tension must be to lift the lower thread up to the middle of the layers of fabric. Having an incorrect tension leads to a poor quality stitch. The prior art teaches three general techniques for determining tension.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,124,697 issued to Foley teaches a digital thread tension monitoring and control device involving a pair of control discs and are separated by a helical spring, as the discs move closer or further the spring expands or contracts and that determines the tension in the thread. The “helical spring” method has been around for a long time and is popular with undergraduate researchers because the physics make for a simple calculation. As the spring is compressed the device reads the compression and correlates that to an average force. The difficulty is that it is not very accurate, with values ranging +/−2 Newtons in recent studies. For example, Carvalho, et al. Adaptive Control of an Electromagnetically Presser-Foot for Industrial Sewing (available at http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/10905/1/ETFA2010_HelderCarvalho.pdf). Efforts to make these systems more accurate are in progress.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,595,150 issued to Yamazaki teaches a thread tension control device utilizing a pneumatic cylinder between a pair of control discs. This system teaches away from the current device and was designed to regulate tension in thread as opposed to displaying the tension.
U.S. Patent Application 2004/0000262 filed by Sakakibara teaches a device that measures the angle of the needle to determine and correct tension between the control discs. Like Yamizaki, no theory is offered on how to measure the tension between the thread discs.
A force sensing device is adapted for sensing thread tension in a long-arm or mid-arm sewing machine. The force sensing device comprises the sewing machine mechanically coupled to a force sensor disk. A user can rotate a tension adjuster knob to increase or decrease thread tension as necessary. The force sensor disk comprises a variable resister that is electrically coupled to a force sensor disk cable; the force sensor disk cable is electrically coupled to a measurement resistor RM, a load resistor RL, a battery and a power switch. As the tension on the force sensor disk increases, resistance increase and current across measurement sensor RM decreases; a digital readout meter determines the tension on the force sensor disk. The tension is displayed on a display screen and can be viewed by the user who can increase or decrease the tension as necessary.
Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
Embodiments of the present invention overcome many of the obstacles associated with discerning the tension of thread in a sewing machine, and now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings that show some, but not all embodiments of the claimed inventions. Indeed, the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
Sewing machine 48 is a long-arm or mid-arm sewing machine. Here, a long-arm or mid-arm sewing machine is a sewing machine that has a stitching capacity of 12 inches or more. Sewing machine 48 is mechanically coupled to tension adjuster threaded post 46 in a well-known manner. Tension adjuster threaded post 46 is immediately adjacent to washer 30, force sensor disk 32, tension spring washer 44, tension spring 42, outer washer 40 and tension adjusting knob 38. In this manner a user can rotate tension adjusting knob 38 to compress tension spring 42 against tension spring washer 44 which compresses force sensor disk 32 and rotates around tension adjuster threaded post 46 to increase or decrease thread tension as necessary.
Here is a deviation from the prior art, Foley Sakakibara and Yamizaki teach that a computer circuit knows better than a seamstress as to increase and decrease tension. As a practical matter, few have purchased the Foley Sakakibara and Yamizaki devices because thread tension is one of a number of factors that can affect a stitch. The skilled seamstress needs to know the tension in the thread, but may not need to correct it in the mechanical manner suggested by the prior art.
As the tension on force sensor disk 32 increases, a force sensor disk resistance decreases and the current across measurement resistor RM 50 increases, producing a corresponding increase in voltage across measurement resistor RM 50. Digital readout meter 10 measures the voltage across measurement resister RM 50, which directly relates to the tension on force sensor disk 32. A tension related voltage is displayed on a display screen is displayed on display 24 and can be viewed by a user who can increase or decrease tension as necessary.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/525,050 filed on Aug. 18, 2011.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1084736 | Hagelstein | Jan 1914 | A |
| 3613610 | Hinerfield et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3618541 | Shryock | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3785308 | Brandriff et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3927631 | Kuhar et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 4100865 | Landau et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4138885 | Moore | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4166423 | Brienza et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4236467 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4280423 | Goncharko | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4289087 | Takenoya et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4292905 | Widmer et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4301757 | Tonomura et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4308814 | Takenoya | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4328757 | Inaba et al. | May 1982 | A |
| 4377980 | Hanyu et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4458613 | Eguchi et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4565143 | Hanyu et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4660481 | Spickermann | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4667614 | Hangarter et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4691648 | Hirose | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4704974 | Herdeg et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4768450 | Kato et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4793273 | Hara et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4811673 | Yoshida | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4884763 | Rydborn | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4899678 | Simons | Feb 1990 | A |
| 5033400 | Fischer | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5199365 | Arnold | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5249538 | Nakano | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5389868 | Mikami et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5390126 | Kongho | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5680827 | Sakanobe et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5711238 | Matsuo et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5806448 | Matsuo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 6321671 | Tomita | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6430460 | Taguchi | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6595150 | Yamazaki | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 7124697 | Foley | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7370592 | Tajima et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7536963 | Durville et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7806063 | Shimizu | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 20040000262 | Sakakibara | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20060107883 | Terao et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20070144417 | Watanabe | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20100199902 | Mori et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20120109357 | Okuyama | May 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61525050 | Aug 2011 | US |