This invention relates generally to the identification and validation of currency notes and more particularly to a detector for determining the presence of foreign objects such as retrieving strings or the like, for the purpose of fraud. Although the invention is of wide application, it is especially applicable to the identification and validation of paper currency in change dispensers, pay stations, vending machines and other equipment where payment is made or an operation enabled by insertion of a currency note. Currency notes are also known as banknotes, paper money or bills.
The use of currency note validators for the purpose of authenticating currency and providing goods, services or change in return, is well known. Many of these validators include a slot opening for receiving currency notes. The note moves along a note path where it is tested for authenticity. The note is either returned by the reversal of the drive moving the note along the path, or it proceeds to a storage location.
A fraudulent activity is to retrieve a note by attaching a piece of string or tape to the note and pulling the note out, once it has been validated and credit has been given. To assist in pulling the strung note out, an invalid piece of paper may be inserted, with the rejection of the paper reversing the rollers, which makes it easier to pull out the strung note. There have been a number of attempts to counteract such “stringing” activity.
One method has been described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,179,110 assigned to Japan Cash Machine Co, and comprises a rotating slotted drum. The note passes through the slot in the centre of the drum. Once the note has passed, and while it is being validated, the drum rotates. The drum winds any string attached to the note around the drum. This method catches the majority of “strung” notes, however, it renders the machine inoperable until an operator comes to unwind the string from the drum. This results in loss of income and user frustration at an inoperable machine.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,952 assigned to Dixle-Jarco, Inc, describes an antiretrieval device for a currency validator. The device includes a punch plate and teeth that define a shear to cut any string or tape attached to a note. If the string or tape is not cut, any attempt to remove the note pulls it across teeth which tear or shred the note. The cutting or tearing of either the string or the note may result in portions of string or note remaining in the machine and affecting its working, thereby putting it out of service.
Another device is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,988,345 assigned to Mars Incorporated. The validator includes two prisms mounted on opposite sides of a note pathway. A light source is provided for emitting light toward the first prism. The first prism reflects the light across the note pathway toward the second prism, with the light passing from the first to the second prism in a straight line parallel to a plane of the note pathway. A photodetector receives light reflected from the second prism. A foreign object, such as a string obstructs a portion of light reflected from the first to the second prism. This method can be extremely sensitive, and indeed is often too sensitive, as it can be affected by sunlight or torch light, or can be recalibrated by use of clear plastic strips. The extreme sensitivity of this device often results in valid notes being rejected, and frustrated users reporting a defective machine.
The applicant does not concede that the prior art discussed above forms part of the common general knowledge in the art at the priority date.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a foreign object detector for currency validators that at least in part addresses one or more of the above-described problems associated with prior art detectors.
According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a foreign object detector for a note validator, the detector including:
Advantageously, the note validator includes an insertion slot at one end of the note path and drive means for moving the note along the note path. Preferably, there is provided control means arranged to open the gate means, drive the note past the gate means and then drive or allow the gate means to move towards its fully closed position, whereby to detect any foreign objects attached to the rear edge of the note. The rear edge of the note may be detected to trigger the closing of the gate means.
Preferably, the note path is generally rectangular and defined by means such as a housing. The gate means may travel from one side of the note path to the opposite side. The periphery of the gate means preferably extends outside the note path and is received within recesses provided in the housing. This provides an overlap that protects the gate means against being forced open. The gate means may be biased towards the fully closed position by a light spring.
Said sensing means may comprise a contact for said gate means that closes an electrical circuit to signal that the gate means is in the fully closed position.
Advantageously, the gate means is associated with an actuator, such as a solenoid, for moving the gate means at least from the fully closed position to the open position. The gate means is preferably connected to the actuator via a right angle drive mechanism. The right angle drive mechanism may include a pair of parallel oblique pin slots, which are engaged by respective pins projecting from the gate means. Said slots may have parallel portions to lock or latch the gate means in the fully closed and/or fully open positions.
Preferably, when viewed from above, the gate means has a zig-zag profile.
According to a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a foreign object detector for a note validator, the detector including:
According to a third aspect of the invention, there is provided a foreign object detector for a note validator, the detector including:
The invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
A foreign object detector 10 is shown in the accompanying drawings and is for use with a note validator 12. The note validator 12 will typically include an insertion slot 14 at one end of a note path 16 and drive means (shown in
As best shown in
When the gate 24 is in the fully closed position, as shown in
When in the fully closed position, projections 38, 40 at the top of the gate 24 contact sensing means, in the form of electrical contacts or pads 42, 44 in the upper housing 20. The contact with the pads 42, 44 closes an electrical circuit, whereby the gate 24 is detected to be in the fully closed position.
If a string 46 was attached to a note 26, as shown in
If the string 46 is preventing the gate 24 from returning to the fully closed position, the electrical circuit is not closed. If, within a prescribed time, the electrical circuit is not closed, then the absence of a gate closed indication from the pads 42, 44 indicates to the control means the probable existence of an object preventing the gate 24 fully closing. When an object in the note path 16 is indicated in this way, the control means responds by opening the gate 24, returning the note 26 and string 46 out the insertion slot 14.
The effect of the recess 30 is to amplify the distance of the projections 38, 40 from the pads 42, 44 caused by the presence of the string 46. Without the recess 30, the gap would be equal to or less than the diameter of the string 46, which is undesirably sensitive to manufacturing tolerances.
The movement of the gate 24 is controlled by an actuator 50, such as a solenoid. A right angled drive mechanism 52 is provided, which includes a plate 54 connected to the end of the armature 56 of the solenoid 50. The plate 54 includes a pair of parallel pin slots 58, 60, which engage pins 62, 64 projecting from the gate 24. The slots 58, 60 are angled or oblique, with the gate 24 being biased towards the closed position, as shown in
Slots 58, 60 have non-oblique parallel end-portions 59 to lock or at least latch the gate 24 in its fully closed and fully open positions.
As can be seen in the embodiment shown in
The foreign object detector of the present invention provides advantages over the prior art, as it does not permanently capture the string, so that the note and its string can be easily rejected, without interfering with the note and without disabling the note validator. The detector is also not sensitive to ambient light conditions.
It will be understood that the invention disclosed and defined in this specification extends to all alternative combinations of two or more of the individual features mentioned or evident from the text or drawings. All of these different combinations constitute various alternative aspects of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2005900897 | Feb 2005 | AU | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3159277 | Carlson | Dec 1964 | A |
4513439 | Gorgone et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
5242041 | Isobe | Sep 1993 | A |
5259490 | Gardellini | Nov 1993 | A |
5325952 | McGinley et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5721420 | May | Feb 1998 | A |
5806649 | Walsh | Sep 1998 | A |
5887695 | Hatamachi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5988345 | Bergeron et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996888 | Gromatzky | Dec 1999 | A |
6179110 | Ohkawa et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6304178 | Hayashida | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6364087 | Abraham | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6648221 | Thawley et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6724324 | Lambert | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7185740 | Beskitt et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20040211644 | Liu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221349 | Beskitt et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060086895 | Fitzgibbon et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 390 727 | Jan 2004 | GB |
2 401 707 | Nov 2004 | GB |
WO 9414141 | Jun 1994 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060209589 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |