Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The invention relates to head-forging, also known as “upsetting”, of long metal bars, and in particular to the cold forging of deformed steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete constructions.
Deformed bars are notoriously difficult to handle by mechanical means not only because of their length and weight, but also because of their extremely wide variations in shapes, dimensions, chemical composition, strength, stiffness, and other related mechanical properties.
These bars need however to be mechanically handled in order to provide continuity of reinforcement in concrete structures. This continuity of reinforcement is best provided by not reducing the properties of the bars themselves at the location of their connection, while still being feasible in a convenient and economical way.
The first method imagined to create such a convenient and economical connection was to make a thread on the bar ends as shown on
This method was then improved into making the thread conical rather than parallel, as illustrated on
However, although providing a tensile strength close to that of the bar, the conical thread connector fails to maintain the ductility of the bar, because of the brittle nature of its failure mode under tensile load.
In order to remedy this, it has been imagined to enlarge the bar end prior to making a thread on it, thereby avoiding to reduce the cross section area of the bars at the location of their connection.
Such an enlargement is best done by forging, but unfortunately lacked the industrial means to produce it effectively and economically. Indeed, forging machines have so far been developed for the mechanical industry, and not for the construction industry. Materials used in the mechanical industry are of regular and accurate dimensions, and of homogeneous properties from one batch to another. By contrast, manufacturers of deformed bars for the reinforcement of concrete are not bound to any dimensional accuracy other than a weight tolerance of up to 5% on the tonnage produced. Worse, the regulations and habits regarding the steel grade used, the shape and dimensions of their ribs and surface vary greatly from one country to another. All of this made the use of an industrially-designed forging press all but impossible.
The purpose of the present invention is to provide a forging machine that enables to prepare deformed steel bars in view of their subsequent threading that is versatile enough to adapt to any steel grade and bar shape and dimension, yet remains convenient and economical to use.
According to the invention, the forging machine for the preparation of steel reinforcement bars in order to connect them by an internally-threaded coupler is characterized by having means to upset the ends of deformed steel bars while its frame and construction design allow long products to go through at least one side of the machine. In order to withstand the forging effort on a long product, it also has means of holding the bar into position. Finally its forging die is specifically designed to accept bars with considerable variations of properties.
Another important novelty is that the face of the forging piston may be used in its retracted position as a stopper for the material to be forged, so that the adjustment of the retracted position of said forging piston will enable to adjust the volume of material to be pressed into the mold.
The present invention will be better understood from the following description together with the drawings that are an integral part of it. These are however only given as an example and are not intended to limit its scope.
The forging means and the clamping means may be in approximately perpendicular configuration as shown in
The frame of the machine could be made of plates (11) held together by tension bars (12) as shown in the embodiment of
Because the long bars to be processed are generally of considerable weight, it is often more economical to bring the machines to the bars, be it to the steel mill, to the cut-and-bend factory, or directly to the construction site, rather than bring these bars to the machine. The frame of the machine may thus be fitted with lifting devices as shown on
Another important novelty of the forging means is shown on top view
In order to accept deformed bars of varying dimensions and sizes, and in particular of varying rib shapes and sizes, said upsetting cavity (16) may bear flow-out hollowings (17) as shown on front view
The go-through cavity may be machined or fitted with gripping teeth (18) as shown on
In order to accept deformed bars of varying mechanical properties and shapes, several forging dies with increasingly progressive variations (19) of diameter enlargement may be provided as shown on
In some occasions, for example when the bars are too heavy to be rotated, or when its location or configuration at the construction site makes it impossible or difficult to rotate, it may be convenient that the internally-threaded connector can be screwed completely onto one of the bars to be connected. The present invention easily solves this problem by continuing the threading of the bar end on the ribs beyond the upset area, or on a longer upset area made by a forging die bearing an extended upsetting cavity (20) as shown on
Another novelty of the present invention is to enable the machine to adapt itself to bars of varying sizes and shapes by having its stroke easily adjustable. Standard industrially-designed forging presses are controlled by the pressure of their power unit. Their stroke may be adjustable by a lengthy down time and by qualified technicians, both of which are not available on a construction site. The present invention solves this problem by a simple device, shown on
Another novelty of the present invention, also shown on
Another novelty of the present invention, also shown on
Many other uses of the invention, accessible to the Man-of-the-Art, may be developed without exiting the scope of the invention. For example, such a development could be to use the machine reversely, as shown on
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
965/DEL/2004 | May 2004 | IN | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3292412 | Costabile | Dec 1966 | A |
3919877 | Netta | Nov 1975 | A |
4126936 | Koller | Nov 1978 | A |
4295357 | Roper | Oct 1981 | A |
4619096 | Lancelot | Oct 1986 | A |
5152118 | Lancelot | Oct 1992 | A |
5158527 | Bernard | Oct 1992 | A |
5308184 | Bernard | May 1994 | A |
5660594 | Viljakainen | Aug 1997 | A |
5709121 | Camping | Jan 1998 | A |
5776001 | Carter | Jul 1998 | A |
5799528 | Camping | Sep 1998 | A |
6230537 | Easterbrook | May 2001 | B1 |
6679092 | Irii | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6708548 | Ehrke et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6735994 | Buhler et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2653809 | May 1991 | FR |
WO 9936207 | Jul 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050262914 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |