The invention relates generally to fork lift trucks and, in particular, to a system for easier and safer shipping handling of this type of equipment.
While fork lift trucks have been designed to carry out various tasks, these trucks all have the same general configuration, that includes a cab for the operator and vertically extended rails upon which the lifting forks ride. In larger units, particularly those used in warehouses or the like, the height of the rails typically exceeds the length of the cab and as a consequence, the units become difficult to handle where they are required to be shipped from one location, such as the manufacturer's facility, to the end users' place of business. Generally these units are tipped over onto their backs and are crated in heavy wooden frames for shipment. Although the overall shipping package has a relatively low profile, the crate itself can increase the overall weight of the unit being shipped and does little to improve the ease of handling of the package. In addition, once the package is opened at the shipping destination, the wood is generally discarded which is not only wasteful but also environmentally unfriendly because of the number of trees that are sacrificed in carrying out this wasteful practice.
Large storage facilities will typically employ a large number of self-propelled fork lift trucks. When not in use the trucks are usually parked in a side by side alignment facing a blank wall or the like. Failure of one or more of the trucks in the alignment to start can cause a problem because of the difficulties involved in handling the disabled vehicle in order to get it to a place where the necessary maintenance can be performed. Similar problems can also be encountered in situations where a truck breaks down in a tight spot within a plant facility that leaves little room for maneuvering. As will be explained in greater detail below, the systems of the present invention may be employed to facilitate shipping of fork lift units and also to handling units that have broken down within a plant.
It is a primary object of the present invention to provide a system that can easily handle a fork lift vehicle during shipping or in the event the vehicle becomes disabled in a work facility.
It is a farther object of the invention to reduce the amount of wood that is presently being used in the creating of fork lift trucks for shipping purposes.
Another object of the present invention is to reduce the costs involved in the packaging of fork lift trucks for shipping.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a more environmentally friendly means for packaging fork lift trucks for shipping.
These and other objects of the present invention are attained by means of a shipping and handling system for fork lift trucks that contain a cab and lifting rails that extend upwardly above the top of the cab. The system includes a first bracket that is secured to the lifting rails at some point above the top of the cab and a second bracket that is secured at the back of the cab so that the truck can be turned over to rest upon the brackets. One of the brackets is equipped with wheels while the other is equipped with a pair of support legs upon which the entire weight of the truck rests when it is inverted. A special adaptor that can be mounted upon a dolly is also provided which is able to engage the unwheeled bracket and lift the truck off of the supporting surface whereupon the truck can be easily maneuvered.
For a better understanding of these and other objects of the invention reference shall be made to the following detailed description of the invention which is to be read in association with the following drawings, wherein:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The example(s) set out herein illustrates one embodiment of the invention but should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
Referring initially to
Although the present invention shall be described with specific relation to the motorized truck illustrated in
As noted above, most fork lift devices of any appreciable rail height are shipped or moved any distance while lying back with the rail in a prone position as illustrated in
The front bracket 25 includes a main mounting member 30 which is an angle iron that contains a first leg 31 and a second leg 32 that are joined together at a right angle corner 33. A pair of hubs 35 and 36 are mounted upon leg 31 of the main member 30 as for example by welding. Each hub includes a pair of side plates 37 and 38 between which a pair of wheels 39-39 are rotatably supported by means for pinions 40-40 that are mounted in the side plates.
Referring once again to
When the front bracket is affixed to the rails as explained above, the main member 30 is generally perpendicular to the rails and wheel sets are generally aligned parallel to the rails.
The rear bracket 27 has a construction that is similar to that of the front bracket and includes a main member 50 which is an angle iron having a first leg 51 and a second leg 52 that are joined at a right angle corner 53. A pair of spaced apart support elements 55-55 are mounted inside the main member 50 and affixed thereto as by welding. The support elements in the embodiment are also angle irons. The length of each element is slightly longer than that of the second leg 52 of the main member.
Bolt receiving holes 57-57 are provided in the first leg 51 of the main bracket element and bolts, similar to the bolts 43-43 shown in
As should be now evident, when the fork lift unit is laid over on its back, the two brackets will support the entire weight of the unit. Lifting the rear bracket, for example by use of a dolly, allows the fork lift unit to be easily moved from place to place as well as maneuvered into and out of tight places.
Turning now to
Side walls 69-69 are secured to the platform along at least a portion of the two side edges so that the side walls hang down over the extended arms of the vertical legs 71 and 72 of the forks and thus prevents the platform from becoming canted when seated upon the forks. As illustrated in
A hitch assembly is mounted upon the top surface of the adaptor platform that is arranged to engage the first leg 51 of the rear bracket 50 or any similar downwardly projecting member found on the back of a fork lift unit. The hitch assembly is comprised of a raised pin 80 that is centered upon the centerline 62 of the platform at the front of the nose section 65. A linear shallow wall 81 is stationed behind the pin and to allow the first leg of the rear bracket or any similar member to pass therebetween. The wall 81 runs perpendicular to the axial centerline of the adaptor and the ends of the wall are inclined toward one another to establish inclined ramps 82-82 that lead upwardly to the top surface of the wall. The latching mechanism may be capable of capturing a downwardly dependent edge of a cab body, as for example that of a small disabled truck 86 shown in
As can be seen, capturing one leg of the rear bracket or a cab member having a similar lid between the pin and the shallow wall of the adaptor enables a dolly or truck operator to move the load in either a forward or backward direction while at the same time steering the load in either direction. The ramps to the shallow wall allow the captured member to move up the wall during tight turns without adversely effecting the load balance.
While the invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof to adapt to particular situations without departing from the scope of the invention. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope and spirit of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1591719 | Merrifield | Jul 1926 | A |
2277302 | Chenette | Mar 1942 | A |
2361592 | Bjork | Oct 1944 | A |
2417553 | Jensen | Mar 1947 | A |
2421123 | Jensen | May 1947 | A |
3052323 | Hopfeld | Sep 1962 | A |
3179196 | Richardson | Apr 1965 | A |
3385401 | Campbell et al. | May 1968 | A |
3411798 | Capadalis | Nov 1968 | A |
3512663 | Guerrico | May 1970 | A |
3780831 | Dickenson | Dec 1973 | A |
3809261 | Lee | May 1974 | A |
3873118 | Takagi | Mar 1975 | A |
3896904 | Walker | Jul 1975 | A |
4221535 | Quinn | Sep 1980 | A |
4458785 | Bushnell, Jr. | Jul 1984 | A |
5161933 | Stauber | Nov 1992 | A |
5236299 | Oskam | Aug 1993 | A |
5692872 | Raben | Dec 1997 | A |
5813820 | Dubosh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5829947 | Litten | Nov 1998 | A |
5967734 | Liu | Oct 1999 | A |
6062800 | Perry et al. | May 2000 | A |
7290782 | Brown | Nov 2007 | B2 |
20070247327 | Hammerl | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080230286 | Turner | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090142174 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
09-286271 | Nov 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090139803 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |