This claims the benefit of German Patent Application No. 10 2008 054 402.7, filed Dec. 9, 2009 and hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention relates to a form aligner for concrete formwork.
European patent application EP 0 971 084 A1 discloses a form aligner for concrete formwork, comprising a base body having a circular-cylindrical outer wall, whereby the base body has a base for purposes of placement onto a structural component. The outer wall constitutes a form alignment surface for concrete formwork. A sleeve which has an opening for a fastening element and which defines a fastening axis of the form aligner is arranged in the center of the intermediate base.
A disadvantage of such form aligners is that they can remain visible when they are used for column formwork since the round form aligners fill up the corners between two formwork walls, as a result of which there is little free space into which the concrete could flow.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a form aligner that leaves a circulation path free for inflowing concrete when used in the corners between two formwork walls.
The present invention provides a form aligner for concrete formwork, having a fastening part that extends along an axis (A), with a base for purposes of placement onto a structural component and having an opening with an abutment for a fastening element as well as at least one form alignment contact point for a formwork wall. Several elongated form alignment contact points running coaxially to the axis (or fastening axis) are provided, of which at least two constitute form alignment pairs that are in a shared plane. This results in an axial free space between the form alignment contact points. This configuration according to the invention ensures that the form aligner leaves a path free so that concrete can flow all around the form aligner, as a result of which the form aligners remain visually inconspicuous in the finished concrete column, and thus do not detract from the appearance. However, at the same time, good functionality is achieved in terms of the sturdiness of the form aligner relative to the formwork walls.
Advantageously, in each case, two elongated form alignment contact points constitute a form alignment pair that is arranged on a form alignment arm extending from the center, as a result of which the stability and sturdiness of the trough-shaped form aligners is enhanced.
It is likewise advantageous for the elongated form alignment contact points that are configured in pairs to be arranged on trough-shaped form alignment elements that are installed at ends of the form alignment arms facing away from the center. This configuration accounts for a high degree of stability of the form alignment contact points, along with a certain amount of elasticity that counters an undesired breakage of the form alignment contact points when a formwork aligner is aligned. At the same time, the trough-shaped form alignment elements that run approximately parallel to the axis or to the fastening axis leave a space free for the flowing concrete.
An advantageously optimized geometry results from providing two form alignment arms that enclose an angle between 110° and 130°. This allows two formwork walls that are approximately at a right angle to each other to be optimally supported.
It is likewise favorable for the elongated form alignment contact points to lie on an enveloping circle that has a radius with respect to the axis. As a result, two adjacent form alignment contact points of the two form alignment arms are also on a shared plane and can thus be utilized to support a formwork wall.
Very stable support can also be achieved if a support arm extending from the center is provided which, together with at least one form alignment arm, encloses an angle (β) between 110° and 130°.
Advantageously, the fastening part is arranged on the support arm, and a fastening element can be arranged on said fastening part in order to attach the form aligner to a structural component.
It is likewise advantageous for at least one support element to protrude from the support arm, as a result of which the forces can be more efficiently transferred and consequently greater loads can be accommodated.
The drawings depict several embodiments of the invention.
The following is shown:
FIG. 1—a perspective view of a form aligner according to the invention;
FIG. 2—a cross section of the form aligner from
Moreover, the form aligner 10 has three arms branching off from the center 15. Of these arms, two are configured as form alignment arms 18 and one as a support arm 19. The ends of the form alignment arms 18 facing away from the center 15 make a transition to trough-shaped form alignment elements 17 whose outer edges running in the axial direction each constitute first form alignment contact points 16a and second form alignment contact points 16b. In this context, the form alignment arms 18 are at an angle α of 120° relative to each other, whereby angles α within the range from 110° to 130° are also possible. Axially positioned free spaces exist between the elongated form alignment contact points 16a, 16b and they leave a space free for the flowing concrete. In contrast, the fastening part 11, along with the opening 13 and the abutment 14, is arranged on the support arm 19. Furthermore, two more support elements 20 that have feet 23 that allow them to be placed on a structural component 50 are provided on the free end of the support arm 19. The support elements 20 are curved like a quarter circle parallel to their extension in the direction of the axis A. The support arm 19 is at an angle β of 120° relative to the adjacent form alignment arm 18, whereby angles β within the range from 110° to 130° are also possible.
The form alignment contact points 16a, 16b running in the axial direction and configured as form alignment edges are all on a shared enveloping circle H whose center point lies in the axis A, with respect to which it has a radius R. Accordingly, the radius R also corresponds to the radial distance of the form alignment contact points 16a, 16b with respect to the axis A. The positioning of all form alignment contact points 16a, 16b of the form alignment arms 18 on a shared enveloping circle H yields three form alignment areas, namely, the two form alignment areas formed by the form alignment contact points 16a, 16b of one form alignment arm 18, and the form alignment area that is formed by the adjacent form alignment contact points 16a, 16b of the two form alignment arms 18.
Moreover, the geometry of the form alignment contact points 16a, 16b relative to the axis A is selected in such a way that the effective lever L1 of the form alignment contact points 16a, 16b with respect to a line running perpendicular to the axis is the same length as the effective lever L2 of the form alignment contact points 16a of the two form alignment arms 18 that are adjacent to each other. Since L1=L1 and L2=L2 and L1=L2, the forces acting during the formwork installation procedure are uniformly distributed onto the fastening part 11 or onto the fastening point. Moreover, this causes the form aligner 10 to be automatically aligned during the formwork installation procedure.
The median lines M of the trough-shaped form alignment elements 17, which run perpendicular to the axis A, are preferably at a right angle relative to each other.
In
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 054 402 | Dec 2008 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2930135 | Rodtz, Sr. | Mar 1960 | A |
3010213 | Rodtz, Sr. | Nov 1961 | A |
3735497 | Boettcher | May 1973 | A |
5136785 | Shirley | Aug 1992 | A |
5288534 | Tavshanjian | Feb 1994 | A |
5479745 | Kawai et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
6347459 | Schmitt | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6625951 | McCarthy | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6874242 | Shilo et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7516558 | Frank et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7673393 | Hudson | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7946093 | Sturino | May 2011 | B1 |
20040060184 | Shilo et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20090235548 | Higgs et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090256053 | Foser et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100140449 | Foser | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 971 084 | Jan 2000 | EP |
2196599 | Jun 2010 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100140449 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |