This international PCT patent application claims priority to Australian provisional patent application filed 11 Oct. 2011, and accorded application number 2011904211. The disclosure of the Australian provisional patent application is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates in general to the monitoring and measuring of fluid pressures in geological formations, and more particularly to measuring techniques which more accurately measure the fluid pressure in the formation at a desired elevation or depth, without being influenced by pressures in the formation above and below the pressure measuring apparatus.
The measurement of pressures in geological formations is often of great importance to engineering and environmental matters. To the civil engineer, pore pressures in soils are important in the design of foundations, slopes and retaining walls. To the hydro-geologist, pressures in aquifers and aquicludes are a key to determining groundwater resources and movement. To the petroleum engineer, understanding the pressure of the fluids is critical in determining the resources and reserves of petroleum fluids.
The civil engineering industry often refers to pressure monitoring systems as piezometers. Piezometers take a variety of forms. The most traditional piezometer involves the placement of an open tube standpipe into a borehole with a sand or gravel pack around a slotted tip. A bentonite seal is placed above the gravel pack and the remainder of the hole is cemented. Variations on this theme exist with some standpipes being fitted with a filter tip, where the filter tip is driven into a clay.
The fluid level is generally measured in standpipe piezometers by measuring the water level therein either manually by some form of dipping system, or by the measurement of pressure above a certain point in the standpipe. This has previously been accomplished by measuring the required pressure to force a bubble out of a tube in the standpipe, but is more commonly undertaken by the use of pressure transducers.
The disadvantage of the standpipe system is that the standpipe has a significant volume. To produce a change in the volume of the fluid in the standpipe, fluid must either come out of the formation to fill the standpipe, or pass from the standpipe into the formation. This requires the formation to have an adequate permeability and storage characteristic to operate with the standpipe. This pressure measuring technique also requires a very good connection between the standpipe and the formation. In all cases, the standpipe adversely functions to dampen the true pressures of the formation.
To overcome the volumetric problems with the use of standpipes, low volume pressure transducers were fixed in a filter zone in a borehole or structure. Because of the inherent instability of early electronic devices, pneumatic piezometers were developed. In the use of pneumatic piezometers, two tubes were fitted to the transducer—one to permit the passage of compressed air to the device, and the other to permit the return of the compressed air after it passed through a pneumatic valve. The pressure of the fluid in the formation was detected by the pressure required to pneumatically open the valve, as detected by the airflow up the return tube. This type of transducer was particularly well suited to the monitoring of earth dams as the tubing and transducers could be easily incorporated into the earth structure.
The next major development was to use electrical transducers, particularly of a vibrating wire type. This type of transducer exhibited better long term drift characteristics as compared to the bridge type transducers of the same era. The vibrating wire transducers had very low volumetric requirements to operate an internal diaphragm, and as such were easily incorporated into filter zones within boreholes. The availability of vibrating wire transducers made it possible to install multiple transducers into a single borehole, although this was generally accomplished by the use of multiple levels of gravel packing and cementing.
The next major development was the realisation that in many cases a pressure transducer could be cemented directly into a borehole. To make this possible, the pressure sensing diaphragm of the transducer must be isolated from the direct contact with the cement, and the cement required adequate permeability to permit a fluid connection between the geological formation and the transducer. With this installation method, there is always an uncertainty as to what is connected to what, i.e. is the formation fluid at the same elevation as the transducer in the borehole, or is the fluid in the formation at some other level in the borehole It has been generally assumed that the pressure measured by the transducer is that of the formation fluid located directly adjacent to where the transducer has been installed. This may not, however, be universally correct as, if the formation adjacent to the transducer is extremely impermeable, and the formation further up the hole is not, then depending on the relative permeabilities of the formations and the cement grout, the pressure measured may not be that produced by the formation located directly adjacent to the pressure transducer. This becomes particularly problematic if shrinkage of the cement grout occurs, which leads to longitudinal leakage paths within the cured grout. When this occurs, the pressure transducer can be influenced by formation pressures that exist above and below the pressure transducer. In this event, the pressure transducer measures the composite of all of the formation pressures to which it is exposed.
Because most exploitable aquifers have high permeability and storage characteristics, the groundwater industry has generally managed to utilise traditional standpipes or the use of monitoring wells. In low permeability formations, investigations have been undertaken to consider low volume fluid pressure measuring techniques.
The petroleum industry is a field where the measurement of geological formation pressures was traditionally accomplished by pressure measurements in test wells or production wells. This situation has since changed dramatically with the introduction of several formation testing tools. Permanent monitoring of formation pressures has also grown with the use of pressure transducers which are fixed in the casing, or to the tubing, having been run into a well and cement grouted into place.
Lastly, it has been proposed that one or more pressure sensing lines could be grouted in the borehole formed in a coal seam to measure the fluid pressures therein. This technique is disclosed in a technical paper published in SPE Reservoir Engineering (February 1987) and entitled ‘Reservoir Engineering in Coal Seams: Part 2—Observations of Gas Movement in Coal Seams’ by Ian Gray. According to this technique, the pressure sensing line(s) is strapped to a PVC conduit and the assembly is lowered into the borehole. The borehole is grouted around the assembly, and the line is filled with water to prevent the grout from flowing up the pressure sensing line. The PVC pipe can accommodate the flow of grout therein. After the grout has set, the pressure sensing line is pressurised to fracture the grout and create an opening to the coal seam. The pressure sensing line can be connected to a pressure gauge or chart recorder located at the surface.
From the foregoing, it can be seen that a need exists for a fluid measuring technique that more accurately measures the fluid pressure in the part of the formation that is at the same depth, elevation or vicinity of the pressure sensor. A further need exists for isolating the pressure sensor in a borehole so that it is only exposed to the fluid pressure in the formation adjacent to the pressure sensor and not to the formation pressure at another position in the hole. A further need exists for a method to isolate the pressure sensor in the borehole using a cement grout between the pressure sensor and the borehole, and then opening a communication path in the cement grout between the pressure sensor and the wall of the borehole where the formation fluid pressure is to be measured. Yet another need exists to undertake the installation of one or more sensors in a single cementing operation.
The various features of the invention permit a more reliable connection system between a pressure sensing location within a cement grouted borehole and the transducer system used to monitor the pressure in the surrounding geological formation. This is accomplished by cementing a conduit fitted with a filter at its bottom end in the borehole at a desired location. The filter is the inlet to the pressure measuring apparatus. The conduit is pressurised with fluid to clear the conduit of any cement grout during this operation. A valve is used to block the backflow of cement grout from the borehole back into the conduit. The valve is preferably a check valve.
Once the cementing operation is complete, but before the cement grout has completely set, a fluid is again introduced into the conduit. The fluid is forced out of the bottom end of the conduit (and the filter) and displaces the cement grout to achieve a fluid connection between the formation and the filter. The process of introducing the fluid into the conduit is preferably accomplished in several stages. The first stage of the initial fluid injection is to ensure the filter end of the conduit is cleaned of cement grout. The second stage of fluid injection takes place to move the cement grout in the borehole from around the bottom end of the conduit. The second stage is normally carried out when the cement grout has started to set. The final fluid injection stage can be advantageously employed to ensure connectivity in certain circumstances, and follows the full setting of the cement grout. In this final stage, a fluid is pumped through the conduit and filter at adequate pressure to cause the local hydrofracture of the geological formation located laterally adjacent to the filter. As such, pressures produced by the geological formation at the filter depth are coupled directly to the input of the pressure measuring apparatus.
In an alternative process, the fracturing of both the grout and the formation can be accomplished following the filter washing and setting of the grout.
According to a feature of the invention, the cement grout is pumped through the borehole formed in the formation using either a grout pipe to convey the grout from the base upwards in the borehole, or if grouting is being undertaken from a borehole collar, a return tube is employed.
In one embodiment of the invention suitable for any reservoir type, a pressure transducer is installed at a desired depth in a bore to measure formation pressures at such depth. The pressure transducer is placed between a filter and a check valve equipped with a pressure relief valve. The check valve is of the type that opens at a predetermined pressure. The opening pressure of the check valve is designed to prevent a standing fluid level in the fluid monitoring zone. The installation involves the lowering of the pressure transducer into the formation on the end of a cable, together with a conduit that is typically a small diameter tubing pipe (typically ¼′ diameter). Cement grouting of the borehole is undertaken along with the staged process of fluid injection in the conduit to clear the filter of grout and then displace the grout so that the filter is in communication with the formation pressure to be measured. In certain circumstances the method can be followed by a hydrofracture process once the grout has set.
In another embodiment of the invention the conduit run into the borehole can be constructed with a small diameter tubing pipe connected to a larger diameter tubing section located near the surface. The installation of the tubing pipe would normally, but not necessarily, be strapped to a grout pipe. When located at a desired depth in the borehole, the top of the tubing pipe is filled with fluid and fitted with a non-return valve. The non-return valve may be automatically or manually operated to achieve a no-return behaviour. The grouting operation for the borehole is then undertaken, whereupon the non-return valve prevents fluid from being pushed out of the conduit due to density or pumping pressure difference. Once grouting is complete, a small volume of fluid is pumped through the conduit to clean the filter. This is followed by the pumping of additional fluid into the conduit to displace the grout in the borehole radially around the inlet filter, usually when the grout has started to set, to avoid mixing the fluid and the grout. In some cases the method can be followed by a hydrofracture process once the grout has set. In this embodiment, fracturing pressures are not impeded by the pressure limitations of the downhole transducer used in the embodiment described above. Once the grout has set, the non-return valve is removed and the pressure sensing transducer is run into the top of the conduit. It is undesirable to permit fluid movement within the conduit as this requires the formation to supply or receive that fluid. To avoid this and to permit the pressure transducer to be located in its most suitable pressure range, the pressure transducer is preferably attached to a packer which is lowered with it into the enlarged upper portion of the conduit. The packer may then be set to block the upper end of the conduit. In this embodiment, the transducer can be removed periodically for calibration or maintenance. It is also possible to alter the location of the transducer within the conduit to suit the pressure range of the device. This embodiment is ideally suited to high accuracy monitoring of groundwater where the fluid in the conduit is a liquid (preferably water) of known density. Preferably the density of the fluid should match that of the reservoir located in the geological formation.
According to a further embodiment of the invention, disclosed is a method of monitoring a fluid pressure in a subterranean formation. The method includes forming a borehole in the subterranean formation at least to a depth where the fluid pressure is to be measured, and then placing a conduit into the borehole to a depth so that a bottom inlet end of the conduit is laterally adjacent a location where the formation pressure is to be measured. A non-return valve is used in the conduit so that liquid cannot pass upwardly all the way through the conduit. A cementitious material is placed in the borehole until the cementitious material rises at least above the bottom inlet end of the conduit. A liquid is pumped down the conduit through the non-return valve, out of the inlet end of the conduit and into the cementitious material in the borehole to displace the cementitious material around the bottom inlet end of the conduit to thereby form a fluid connection to the formation. A pressure sensing device is coupled to the formation fluid pressure within the conduit to measure the fluid pressure of the formation at the desired depth.
According to yet another embodiment of the invention, disclosed is a method of monitoring a fluid pressure in a subterranean formation, which includes forming a borehole in the subterranean formation at least to a depth where the fluid pressure is to be measured. A pressure sensing device is connected to a bottom inlet end of a conduit so that the pressure sensing device measures fluid pressures at the inlet end of the conduit, and the conduit is lowered into the borehole until the inlet end of the conduit is at a depth where the formation pressure is to be measured. The borehole is then filled with a cementitious material to a level substantially above the inlet end of the conduit and the cementitious material is prevented from flowing up the conduit, whereby the cementitious material surrounds the inlet end of the conduit. The inlet end of the conduit is purged of cementitious material by pumping a liquid down the conduit. A lateral fluid path is formed between the inlet end of the conduit and the formation, whereby the formation pressure forces the formation fluid to flow through the fluid path and through the inlet end of the conduit to the pressure sensing device so that the formation fluid pressure is measured.
According to yet a further embodiment of the invention, disclosed is a method of monitoring a fluid pressure in a subterranean formation, which includes placing a conduit in a borehole formed in the subterranean formation so that a pressure measuring inlet of the conduit is located at a depth where the formation pressure is to be measured. A pressure sensing device is connected to the conduit to measure pressures at the pressure measuring inlet of the conduit. The borehole is filled with a cementitious material above and below the pressure measuring inlet of the conduit so that the pressure measuring inlet has a fluid communication path outwardly to the formation, but the pressure measuring inlet of the conduit is isolated by the cementitious material from other portions of the formation located above and below the pressure measuring inlet of the conduit.
Further features and advantages will become apparent from the following and more particular description of the preferred and other embodiments of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters generally refer to the same parts, functions or elements throughout the views, and in which:
As noted above, the connector block (9) is internally cross ported to connect together the filter (10), the pressure transducer (5) and the check valve (7). The pressure transducer (5) is electrically connected to the surface by a cable (6) which transfers signals corresponding to the differential pressure across the transducer (5). The pressure transducer (5) can be of the conventional piezometer type for sensing the differential pressure across a movable diaphragm, and providing a corresponding electrical signal output. Other types of pressure sensors having electrical outputs can be employed with equal effectiveness. The check valve (7) is connected to the fluid injection pipe (8) which also extends to the surface.
Prior to grouting the borehole (1) via the grout pipe (3), the fluid injection tube (8) is filled with a liquid, such as water, under sufficient pressure that the fluid passes through the check valve (7), the connector block (9), out of the filter (10) and into the borehole (1). The liquid is pumped into the injection tube (8) to clear the system of any bubbles of gas and to ensure the filter (10) is clear of any blockage which may have occurred during its placement in the borehole (1).
A preset pressure relief type of check valve (7) is similarly screwed into the connector block (9), as is the filter (10). The connector block (9) contains internal passages (20), (21), (25), and (22) to provide a common connection between the components connected to the block (9). The passage (20) is blocked by grub screws (23) and (24) to prevent communication of the internal passages of the connector block (9) with the borehole (1). The fluid injection pipe (8) is connected to the inlet side of the pressure relief and check valve (7). As described above, the fluid injection pipe (8) is supplied with a fluid from up hole pump equipment.
From the foregoing, described is an embodiment of a formation fluid pressure sensing system in which the pressure transducer (5) is precisely located down a borehole (1) at a location where the pressure in the geological formation is to be measured. The pressure transducer (5) together with a filter (10) is fixed in the borehole (1) at the desired location by placing a cement grout around the pressure transducer (5). Before the cement grout is fully cured, a liquid is pumped down hole through a check valve (7) to clear the filter (10) of the cement grout material. Subsequently a fluid is again pumped down the borehole (1) through the check valve (7) to form a void or communication path between the formation and the pressure transducer (5). The cement grout material around the void (13) isolates the pressure transducer (5) in the borehole (1), except the laterally adjacent portion of the geological formation where it is desired to obtain fluid pressure measurements.
In operation, the fluid pressure produced by the geological formation enters the pressure sensing system through the formation fractures to the void zone (13) around the filter (10). Again, this occurs at an elevation in the formation where it is desired to measure the pressure. The pressure of the formation fluid rises in the injection tube (30) and exerts a corresponding force on the bottom of the pressure sensing member of the pressure transducer (5). The top of the pressure sensing member is held at a static pressure, and thus the pressure transducer is able to accurately measure the formation pressure. In some instances the transducer will be used to measure water head in a groundwater body with a phreatic surface. In this case it is advantageous to vent the top of the pressure sensing member to atmospheric pressure and the bottom to the local groundwater pressure. Changes in the formation pressure, if any, are sensed by the pressure transducer (5) and coupled by corresponding electrical signals to the surface monitoring equipment.
It should be appreciated that while reference is made in
From the foregoing, disclosed are various embodiments of geological formation pressure sensing systems that more accurately measure the formation pressures at desired depths. The inlet to the pressure sensing apparatus is located at a desired depth in the formation, and isolated to pressures produced by the formation at such depth. As such, the measurement of the formation pressure is not affected by other and different pressures that could otherwise exist in the borehole above and below the inlet to the pressure measuring apparatus.
While the preferred and other embodiments of the invention have been disclosed with reference to specific formation pressure sensing systems, and associated methods and manufacture thereof, it is to be understood that many changes in detail may be made as a matter of engineering choices without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2011904211 | Oct 2011 | AU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU2012/001221 | 10/10/2012 | WO | 00 | 4/8/2014 |