This application is the U.S. National Stage under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/044608 filed May 20, 2009, entitled “Formation Tester Pad.”
Not applicable
During the drilling and completion of oil and gas wells, it may be necessary to engage in ancillary operations, such as evaluating the production capabilities of formations intersected by the wellbore. For example, after a well or well interval has been drilled, zones of interest are often tested to determine various formation properties such as permeability, fluid type, fluid quality, formation temperature, formation pressure, bubblepoint and formation pressure gradient. These tests are performed in order to determine whether commercial exploitation of the intersected formations is viable and how to optimize production. The acquisition of accurate data from the wellbore is critical to the optimization of hydrocarbon wells. This wellbore data can be used to determine the location and quality of hydrocarbon reserves, whether the reserves can be produced through the wellbore, and for well control during drilling operations.
A downhole tool is used to acquire and test a sample of fluid from the formation. More particularly, a probe assembly is used for engaging the borehole wall and acquiring the formation fluid samples. The probe assembly may include an isolation pad to engage the borehole wall. The isolation pad seals against the formation and around a hollow sample probe, creating a sealing arrangement that creates a seal between the sample probe and the formation in order to isolate the probe from wellbore fluids. The sealed probe arrangement also places an internal cavity of the tool in fluid communication with the formation. This creates a fluid pathway that allows formation fluid to flow between the formation and the formation tester while isolated from the borehole fluids. The fluid pathway may be enhanced by extending the sample probe to couple to the formation.
In order to acquire a useful sample, the probe must stay isolated from the relative high pressure of the borehole fluid. Therefore, the integrity of the seal that is formed by the isolation pad is critical to the performance of the tool. If the borehole fluid is allowed to leak into the collected formation fluids, a non-representative sample will be obtained and the test will have to be repeated.
Formation testing tools may be used in conjunction with wireline logging operations or as a component of a logging-while-drilling (LWD) or measurement-while-drilling (MWD) package. In wireline logging operations, the drill string is removed from the wellbore and measurement tools are lowered into the wellbore using a heavy cable (wireline) that includes wires for providing power and control from the surface. In LWD and MWD operations, the measurement tools are integrated into the drill string and are ordinarily powered by batteries and controlled by either on-board or remote control systems. With LWD/MWD testers, the testing equipment is subject to harsh conditions in the wellbore during the drilling process that can damage and degrade the formation testing equipment before and during the testing process. These harsh conditions include vibration and torque from the drill bit, exposure to drilling mud, drilled cuttings, and formation fluids, hydraulic forces of the circulating drilling mud, high downhole temperatures, and scraping of the formation testing equipment against the sides of the wellbore. Sensitive electronics and sensors must be robust enough to withstand the pressures and temperatures, and especially the extreme vibration and shock conditions of the drilling environment, yet maintain accuracy, repeatability, and reliability.
A generic formation tester is lowered to a desired depth within a wellbore. The wellbore is filled with mud, and the wall of the wellbore is coated with a mudcake. Once the formation tester is at the desired depth, it is set in place and an isolation pad is extended to engage the mudcake. The isolation pad seals against mudcake and around the hollow sample probe, which places an internal cavity in fluid communication with the formation. This creates the fluid pathway that allows formation fluid to flow between the formation and the formation tester while isolated from wellbore fluids.
The isolation or seal pad is generally a simple rubber pad affixed to a metal support member. The outer sealing surface is cylindrical or spherical. Stresses from use and downhole pressures and temperatures tend to quickly fatigue the rubber pad, leading to premature failure. Therefore, there remains a need to develop an isolation or seal pad that provides reliable sealing performance with an increased durability and resistance to stress. In this manner, an extended seal pad life provides an increased number of tests that can be performed without replacing the pad.
For a detailed description of exemplary embodiments of the invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
In the drawings and description that follow, like parts are typically marked throughout the specification and drawings with the same reference numerals. The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale. Certain features of the disclosure may be shown exaggerated in scale or in somewhat schematic form and some details of conventional elements may not be shown in the interest of clarity and conciseness. The present disclosure is susceptible to embodiments of different forms. Specific embodiments are described in detail and are shown in the drawings, with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered an exemplification of the principles of the disclosure, and is not intended to limit the disclosure to that illustrated and described herein. It is to be fully recognized that the different teachings of the embodiments discussed below may be employed separately or in any suitable combination to produce desired results.
In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . ”. Unless otherwise specified, any use of any form of the terms “connect”, “engage”, “couple”, “attach”, or any other term describing an interaction between elements is not meant to limit the interaction to direct interaction between the elements and may also include indirect interaction between the elements described. Reference to up or down will be made for purposes of description with “up”, “upper”, “upwardly” or “upstream” meaning toward the surface of the well and with “down”, “lower”, “downwardly” or “downstream” meaning toward the terminal end of the well, regardless of the well bore orientation. In addition, in the discussion and claims that follow, it may be sometimes stated that certain components or elements are in fluid communication. By this it is meant that the components are constructed and interrelated such that a fluid could be communicated between them, as via a passageway, tube, or conduit. Also, the designation “MWD” or “LWD” are used to mean all generic measurement while drilling or logging while drilling apparatus and systems. The various characteristics mentioned above, as well as other features and characteristics described in more detail below, will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the embodiments, and by referring to the accompanying drawings.
Referring initially to
In some embodiments, and with reference to
Referring to
The tool 120 may include a plurality of transducers 115 disposed on the tool 120 to relay downhole information to the operator at surface or to a remote site. The transducers 115 may include any conventional source/sensor (e.g., pressure, temperature, gravity, etc.) to provide the operator with formation and/or borehole parameters, as well as diagnostics or position indication relating to the tool. The telemetry network 100 may combine multiple signal conveyance formats (e.g., mud pulse, fiber-optics, acoustic, EM hops, etc.). It will also be appreciated that software/firmware may be configured into the tool 120 and/or the network 100 (e.g., at surface, downhole, in combination, and/or remotely via wireless links tied to the network).
Referring to
Communication elements 155 allow the transfer of power and/or data between the sub connections and through the tool 120. The communication elements 155 may comprise inductive couplers, direct electrical contacts, optical couplers, and combinations thereof. The conductor 150 may be disposed through a hole formed in the walls of the outer tubular members of the tool 120 and pipes 103. In some embodiments, the conductor 150 may be disposed part way within the walls and part way through the inside bore of the tubular members or drill collars. In some embodiments, a coating may be applied to secure the conductor 150 in place. In this way, the conductor 150 will not affect the operation of the testing tool 120. The coating should have good adhesion to both the metal of the pipe and any insulating material surrounding the conductor 150. Useable coatings 312 include, for example, a polymeric material selected from the group consisting of natural or synthetic rubbers, epoxies, or urethanes. Conductors 150 may be disposed on the subs using any suitable means.
A data/power signal may be transmitted along the tool 120 from one end of the tool through the conductor(s) 150 to the other end across the communication elements 155. Referring to
Referring next to
The draw down piston assembly 208 includes a piston chamber 252 containing a draw down piston 254 and a manifold 256 including various fluid and electrical conduits and control devices, as one of ordinary skill in the art would understand. The draw down piston assembly 208, the probe 220, the sensor 206 (e.g., a pressure gauge) and the valve assembly 212 communicate with each other and various other components of the probe collar 200, such as the manifold 244 and hydraulic system 242, as well as the tool 10 via conduits 224a, 224b, 224c and 224d. The conduits 224a, 224b, 224c, 224d include various fluid flow lines and electrical conduits for operation of the probe assembly 210 and probe collar 200.
For example, one of conduits 224a, 224b, 224c, 224d provides a hydraulic fluid to the probe 220 to extend the probe 220 and engage the formation 9. Another of these conduits provides hydraulic fluid to the draw down piston 254, actuating the piston 254 and causing a pressure drop in another of these conduits, a formation fluid flow line to the probe 220. The pressure drop in the flow line also causes a pressure drop in the probe 220, thereby drawing formation fluids into the probe 220 and the draw down piston assembly 208. Another of the conduits 224a, 224b, 224c, 224d is a formation fluid flow line communicating formation fluid to the sensor 206 for measurement, and to the valve assembly 212 and the manifold 244. The flow line shutoff valve 214 controls fluid flow through the flow line, and the equalizer valve 216 is actuatable to expose the flow line the and probe assembly 210 to a fluid pressure in an annulus surrounding the probe collar 200, thereby equalizing the pressure between the annulus and the probe assembly 210. The manifold 244 receives the various conduits 224a, 224b, 224c, 224d, and the hydraulic system 242 directs hydraulic fluid to the various components of the probe assembly 210 as just described. One or more of the conduits 224a, 224b, 224c, 224d are electrical for communicating power from a power source, and control signals from a controller in the tool, or from the surface of the well.
Drilling fluid flow bore 204 may be offset or deviated from a longitudinal axis of the drill collar 202, such that at least a portion of the flow bore 204 is not central in the drill collar 202 and not parallel to the longitudinal axis. The deviated portion of the flow bore 204 allows the receiving aperture 222 to be placed in the drill collar 202 such that the probe member 220 can be fully recessed below the drill collar 202 outer surface. Space for formation testing and other components is limited. Drilling fluid must also be able to pass through the probe collar 200 to reach the drill bit 7. The deviated or offset flow bore 204 allows an extendable sample device such as probe 220 and other probe embodiments described herein to retract and be protected as needed, and also to extend and engage the formation for proper formation testing.
Referring now to
Referring to
The seal pad 724 is preferably made of an elastomeric material. The elastomeric seal pad 724 seals and prevents drilling fluid or other borehole contaminants from entering the probe 700 during formation testing. In addition to this primary seal, the seal pad 724 tends to deform and press against the snorkel 716 that is extended through the seal pad aperture 738 to create a secondary seal.
Another embodiment of the probe is shown as probe 800 in
Referring to
The metal skirt 402 includes an outer raised edge 450 and an inner raised edge 440. The inner raised edge 440 surrounds an inner cavity 430 having bores 432, 434 for receiving various components of the formation testing tool. The elastomeric pad element 404 abuts the inner surfaces of the raised edges 440, 450 such that the pad fills the space therein and the raised edges support the deformable pad element 404. An outer surface of the pad element 404 includes ridges, ribs or raised portions 410 and alternating valleys, grooves or spaces 420.
Referring to
In some embodiments, the seal pad element includes other configurations. Referring to
Referring to
In addition to the ridge and groove arrangements, the seal pad portions above the skirt profile and the spaces below the skirt profile may also be effected by other types of raised portions, such as projections and dimples or bumps and depressions.
The embodiments set forth herein are merely illustrative and do not limit the scope of the disclosure or the details therein. It will be appreciated that many other modifications and improvements to the disclosure herein may be made without departing from the scope of the disclosure or the inventive concepts herein disclosed. Because many varying and different embodiments may be made within the scope of the inventive concept herein taught, including equivalent structures or materials hereafter thought of, and because many modifications may be made in the embodiments herein detailed in accordance with the descriptive requirements of the law, it is to be understood that the details herein are to be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/044608 | 5/20/2009 | WO | 00 | 3/11/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/134912 | 11/25/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3171485 | White, Jr. | Mar 1965 | A |
3173485 | Bretzke, Jr. | Mar 1965 | A |
3212574 | Fox | Oct 1965 | A |
3324712 | Watson et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
3490776 | Avery | Jan 1970 | A |
3530933 | Whitten | Sep 1970 | A |
3565119 | Pierpont, Jr. | Feb 1971 | A |
3565169 | Bell | Feb 1971 | A |
3599719 | Brown | Aug 1971 | A |
3658127 | Cochran et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3659647 | Brown | May 1972 | A |
3673864 | Cubberly, Jr. | Jul 1972 | A |
3776561 | Haney | Dec 1973 | A |
3811321 | Urbanosky | May 1974 | A |
3813936 | Urbanosky et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3858445 | Urbanosky | Jan 1975 | A |
3859850 | Whitten et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3859851 | Urbanosky | Jan 1975 | A |
3864970 | Bell | Feb 1975 | A |
3868826 | Landers | Mar 1975 | A |
3924463 | Urbanosky | Dec 1975 | A |
3934468 | Brieger | Jan 1976 | A |
3952588 | Whitten | Apr 1976 | A |
4003581 | Hutchinson | Jan 1977 | A |
4046011 | Olsen | Sep 1977 | A |
4053354 | Kitsnik | Oct 1977 | A |
4146092 | Upton | Mar 1979 | A |
4161319 | Stocking | Jul 1979 | A |
4210018 | Brieger | Jul 1980 | A |
4224987 | Allen | Sep 1980 | A |
4234197 | Amancharla | Nov 1980 | A |
4246782 | Hallmark | Jan 1981 | A |
4248081 | Hallmark | Feb 1981 | A |
4252195 | Fredd | Feb 1981 | A |
4270385 | Hallmark | Jun 1981 | A |
4287946 | Brieger | Sep 1981 | A |
4288082 | Setterberg, Jr. | Sep 1981 | A |
4289200 | Fisher, Jr. | Sep 1981 | A |
4292842 | Hallmark | Oct 1981 | A |
4302018 | Harvey et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4323256 | Miyagishima et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4339948 | Hallmark | Jul 1982 | A |
4416152 | Wilson | Nov 1983 | A |
4434653 | Montgomery | Mar 1984 | A |
4441721 | Harris et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4444400 | Norman | Apr 1984 | A |
4452463 | Buckner | Jun 1984 | A |
4482086 | Wagner et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4500095 | Schisler et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4507957 | Montgomery et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4512399 | Gano et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4513612 | Shalek | Apr 1985 | A |
4535843 | Jagler | Aug 1985 | A |
4579314 | Schaeper et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4589485 | Wray | May 1986 | A |
4593560 | Purfurst | Jun 1986 | A |
4610158 | Lawton, Jr. | Sep 1986 | A |
4635717 | Jaegler | Jan 1987 | A |
4638860 | Magee, Jr. et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4745802 | Purfurst | May 1988 | A |
4753444 | Jackson et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4765404 | Bailey et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4843878 | Purfurst et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4845982 | Gilbert | Jul 1989 | A |
4860580 | DuRocher | Aug 1989 | A |
4860581 | Zimmerman et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4862967 | Harris | Sep 1989 | A |
4879900 | Gilbert | Nov 1989 | A |
4884439 | Baird | Dec 1989 | A |
4890487 | Dussan et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4936139 | Zimmerman et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4941350 | Schneider | Jul 1990 | A |
4951749 | Carroll | Aug 1990 | A |
5056595 | Desbrandes | Oct 1991 | A |
5095745 | Desbrandes | Mar 1992 | A |
5101907 | Schultz et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5148705 | Desbrandes | Sep 1992 | A |
5184508 | Desbrandes | Feb 1993 | A |
5230244 | Gilbert | Jul 1993 | A |
5231874 | Gilbert | Aug 1993 | A |
5233866 | Desbrandes | Aug 1993 | A |
5238070 | Schultz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5249461 | Ponder et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5265015 | Auzerais et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269180 | Dave et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5279153 | Dussan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5303775 | Michaels et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5311938 | Hendrickson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318117 | Echols, III et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329811 | Schultz et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5335542 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5377755 | Michaels et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390738 | Eslinger et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5390939 | Terauchi et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5433269 | Hendrickson | Jul 1995 | A |
5473939 | Leder et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5489740 | Fletcher | Feb 1996 | A |
5549159 | Shwe et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5587525 | Shwe et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5602334 | Proett et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604130 | Warner et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5622223 | Vasquez | Apr 1997 | A |
5635631 | Yesudas et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644076 | Proett et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5676213 | Auzerais et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5741962 | Birchak et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743333 | Willauer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5803186 | Berger et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5826662 | Beck et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5857520 | Mullen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5934374 | Hrametz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5961123 | Ingram et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5992522 | Boyd et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007067 | Hiorth | Dec 1999 | A |
6047239 | Berger et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6203020 | Mireles, Jr. et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230798 | Appleton | May 2001 | B1 |
6250638 | Youngquist | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6301959 | Hrametz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6557640 | Cook et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565093 | Crow et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6568487 | Meister et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6658930 | Abbas | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7090012 | Hill et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114562 | Fissler et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121338 | van Zuilekom et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128144 | Fox et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7204309 | Segura et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7260985 | Gilbert et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7395879 | Segura et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20010035289 | Runia | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020189339 | Montalvo et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030068599 | Balfour et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030098162 | Cook | May 2003 | A1 |
20030145652 | Arian | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040079909 | Foster | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040173351 | Fox et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050072565 | Segura et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050109538 | Fissler et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050155760 | Hill et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050161218 | van Zuilekom et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050257611 | Fogal et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070007008 | Sherrill | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070181341 | Segura et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080000646 | Thomson | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080295588 | van Zuilekom et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1108985 | Sep 1981 | CA |
1167761 | May 1984 | CA |
1182393 | Feb 1985 | CA |
1212315 | Oct 1986 | CA |
1280362 | Feb 1991 | CA |
2103096 | May 1994 | CA |
2096068 | Jun 1998 | CA |
2318157 | Jul 1999 | CA |
2215422 | Apr 2002 | CA |
2389123 | Jun 2002 | CA |
2185169 | Oct 2002 | CA |
2185170 | Oct 2002 | CA |
2204329 | Mar 2005 | CA |
1356452 | Jul 2002 | CN |
0102756 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0250107 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0453051 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0453052 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0497588 | Aug 1992 | EP |
0599422 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0978630 | Sep 2000 | EP |
2789469 | Aug 2000 | FR |
1455955 | Nov 1976 | GB |
2204922 | Nov 1988 | GB |
2226908 | Jul 1990 | GB |
2283516 | May 1995 | GB |
2312908 | Nov 1997 | GB |
2328229 | Feb 1999 | GB |
2333310 | Jul 1999 | GB |
2350635 | Jun 2000 | GB |
2378719 | Feb 2003 | GB |
2097555 | Nov 1997 | RU |
2120023 | Oct 1998 | RU |
2128278 | Mar 1999 | RU |
2201495 | Oct 2000 | RU |
306745 | Nov 1966 | SU |
1735575 | May 1992 | SU |
1745894 | Jul 1992 | SU |
1763646 | Sep 1992 | SU |
8102457 | Sep 1981 | WO |
9639481 | Dec 1996 | WO |
9728348 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9936663 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0043812 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0198630 | Dec 2001 | WO |
03097999 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004081334 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005072430 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2007005071 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007146801 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Application No. PCT/US2009/044608 Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 18, 2010. |
G D. Phelps et al.;“The Effect of Filtrate Invasion and Formation Wettability on Repeat Formation Tester Measurements”; 1984 European Petroleum Conference; Oct. 25-28, 1984; pp. 59-68 with Figures 1-12; SPE 12962; Society of Pertroleum Engineers of AIME; London, England. |
Mark A. Proett et al.; “Supercharge Pressure Compensation Using a New Wireline Testing Method and Newly Developed Early Time Spherical Flow Model”; 1996 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition; Oct. 6-9, 1996; pp. 329-342; SPE 36524; Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc.; Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. |
W. B. Underhill et al.; “Model-Based Sticking Risk Assessment for Wireline Formation Testing Tools in the U.S. Gulf Coast”; 1998 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition; Sep. 27-30, 1998; pp. 79-89; SPE 48963; Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc.; New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A. |
R. Parkes et al.; “New Techniques in Wireline Formation Testing in Tight Reservoirs”; 1998 SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition; Oct. 12-14, 1998; pp. 419-430; SPE 50128; Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc.; Perth, Australia. |
Amit K. Sakar et al.; “Adverse Effects of Poor Mudcake Quality: A Supercharging and Fluid Sampling Study”; SPE Reservoir Eval. & Eng. 3 (3); Jun. 2000; pp. 256-262; Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc.; U.S.A. |
Hui Xu et al.; “In Situ Filtrate Flowrate Measurements With the Wireline Formation Tester”; SPWLA 34th Annual Logging Symposium; Jun. 13-16, 1993; pp. 1-15. |
Margaret C. Waid et al.; “Interpretation of Wireline Formation Tester Pressure Response With Combined Flowline and Chamber Storage, Mud Supercharging and Mud Invasion Effects”; SPWLA 33rd Annual Logging Symposium; Jun. 14-17, 1992; pp. 1-25. |
Halliburton MRILab.RTM. Service product brochure; pp. 124-125; 2003. |
R. Desbrandes et al.; “A New Concept in Wireline Formation Testing: Extended Drawdown”; 13th CWLS Formation Evaluation Symp.; 1991; Calgary, Canada; pp. 1-25. |
“Well Testing Using Wireline Methods”; Schlumberger S. East Asia Well Evaluation Conference; Oct. 1981; pp. 121-144. |
L Moinard et al.; “Permeability Quantification from Borehole Stoneley Waves”; Proceedings Second Int. Pet. Conf. & Exbn.; pp. 547-558; Petrotech-97; New Delhi, India. |
A. A. Adeyemi-Bero et al.; “First Horizontal Well in the Shallow, Unconsolidated Sand and Viscous/Heavy Oil Reservoir of the Sapele Field, Nigeria”; 17th Annual Conference of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Nigeria Council; 1993 pp. 71-84; SPENC 9308; Society of Petroleum Engineers, Nigeria Council; Warri, Nigeria. |
Robert Desbrandes; “Wireline Formation Testing: A New Extended Drawdown Technique”; Petroleum Engineer International, May 1991; pp. 40-44; vol. 63, No. 5. |
Neal G. Skinner et al.; “Formation-Pressure Test Tools: Pt. 2: Pressure Test Validity Shown by Comparing Field Tests and Simulations”; Oil & Gas Journal; Jan. 12, 1998; pp. 46-48. |
R. Desbrandes et al.; “Wettability and Productivity Characterization of Low Permeability Gas Formations: Topical Report”; Gas Research Institute; Report GRI-92/0405; Dec. 1992. |
L. Lin; “Reservoir Characterization with RFT Logs Using a Modes for Anisotropic Model”; SPWLA/China Petroleum Society Well Logging Joint Symposium; May 17-20, 1994; pp. 307-313; Xian, China. |
R. Desbrandes et al.; “Wettability and Productivity Characterizations of Low Premeability Gas Formations: Annual Report”; Gas Research Institute; Report GRI-91/0135; Mar. 1991. |
International Application No. PCT/US2005/003039 Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 10, 2005. |
Australian Patent Examination Report, Patent Application No. 2009346365, Jan. 8, 2015, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120111632 A1 | May 2012 | US |