Patent Grant
9114339
The invention relates to a filter element that can be used for general filtration. One filtration application is removing a liquid or solid particulate from a mobile fluid and methods of manufacturing the element. In one embodiment of the invention, the filter element is used to remove an oily or aqueous/oil liquid aerosol or particulate entrained in a gaseous or air mobile fluid. In such an embodiment, the aerosol entrained in the fluid contacts the media, coalesces, and drains from the media leaving the mobile fluid free of the entrained liquid aerosol particulate. The liquid accumulates in the media and under the effect of gravity, drains from the element and can be reserved.
Cellulosic, synthetic and mixed cellulosic synthetic media in the form of a flexible paper filter have been known for many years. Such media layers have been used as is and have been combined with other filter components to form active filtration elements. Such elements can be made of a variety of macro and microfibers having a range of fiber lengths and diameters. In large part, these layers are made in papermaking machines resulting in a substrate layer typically less than 5 millimeters and most often less than 2 millimeters in thickness. Such thin flexible filter media have found a number of useful applications, however, such layers have limits in their applicability. The ability to achieve certain filtration attributes such as pore size, basis weight, thickness, permeability and efficiency are limited by the manufacturing techniques used to make the paper layers and by the components useful in such layers.
Because aerosols, as an example, may be as small as him diameter or as large as 1 mm (W. Hinds, Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles 8, 2nd ed., © 1999 J. Wiley & Sons), conventional technologies are not suitably flexible to effectively accommodate the range of particle sizes in which aerosols may be encountered in air. Further, aerosols may be present in large concentrations in the air streams in certain filtration applications. For example, in diesel engine blow-by or other heavy duty motor exhaust or industrial filtration applications, it is possible to encounter aerosols in concentrations of 700 ppm to 20,000 ppm. Such concentrations are not filtered with high efficiency using the thin filters of the prior art; thus, multiple layers are usually employed.
Accordingly, a substantial need exists in obtaining an improved filtration layer having a substantial thickness, a defined basis weight, solidity and pore size useful for a variety of filtration processes. One useful technique is to use an aqueous slurry based material such as that disclosed in U.S. Ser. No. 11/267,958. Sugiura et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,755,963, teach a filter element comprising microfibers made from a slurry to obtain a density gradient structure useful in oil filtration. Nielsen et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,167,765, teach the use of polyester bicomponent fiber and other fibers in making bonded fibrous wet laid sheets for filtration applications.
Filter media have been configured in a variety of filter units for many different filtration applications. In one application, it has been common to remove liquid aerosol particulate from a mobile gaseous phase such as air by using filter elements comprising cellulosic and cellulosic/synthetic fiber combinations wet-laid flat media that has been corrugated and pleated into a useful cylindrical shaped elements of different heights and diameters. The use of formed media comprised wholly of glass fibers and aqueous or solvent based resins for the purpose of consolidating the fibers mass and providing strength and structural integrity has been practiced. Limitations thereof are specific to fiber size (approximately 0.08 to about 4 microns fiber diameter) and to the fact that a secondary process to apply the resin is necessary to consolidate the filter media and provide structural integrity for the performance and survivability of the element in such demanding applications. Further, these filter media suffer from resin migration during the filter media life, which in turn causes a loss of porosity. In use, this loss of porosity is evidenced by increased pressure drop across the filter, clogging of pores, and cracking of the filter, thus leading to early filter failure. Further, these filter media are brittle and may shatter under challenging conditions, leading to catastrophic failure. Finally, the above filter making technique has a practical limit of about 5.0 mm thickness, such that the ability to make thicker media for use with different aerosols or adaptation for other filtration applications is not provided. Nevertheless, the use of wet-laid paper-like media is prevalent in the application of removing aerosol particulates from airstreams.
Some examples of conventional commercially available filtration media for the separation of aerosols from air are products available from the Porous Media Company of St. Paul, Minn.; Keltec Technolab of Twinsburg, Ohio; ProPure Filtration Company of Tapei, Taiwan; Finite® and Balston® filters made by the Parker Hannifin Corporation of Mayfield, Ohio; Fai Filtri s.r.l. of Pontirolo Nuovo, Italy; Mann+Hummel Group of Ludwigsburg, Germany; and PSI Global Ltd. Of Bowburn Durham, United Kingdom.
A substantial need exists to provide a filter medium having improved efficiency of removal of the liquid aerosol from the air stream and reduced pressure drop, and acceptable basis weight and void volume which leads to an increased useful lifetime in application conditions. A substantial need exists to simplify the construction of such filtration apparatus, thereby decreasing the complication and expense of the manufacturing processes over those currently used. A substantial need also exists to provide a filter media having reduced brittleness that can withstand challenging conditions without shattering. A substantial need also exists to provide a filter medium that does not undergo resin migration during use. A substantial need exists to provide a method of making filter media that is adaptable for other filtration applications, such as the removal of solid particulates from air or the removal of impurities from water. A substantial need also exists for a method of making a filter that is adaptable for entraining materials such as particles and polymers that in turn provide functionality to the filter structure. Finally, there is a substantial need to provide a method of making filter media having multiple layers such that each layer has a different structure or composition, e.g. by varying permeability of the layers or by incorporating particles into a layer. These and other advantages are found in the filtration media disclosed below.
We have found that a useful filter element having a thickness of greater than 3 millimeters can be made by combining a bicomponent fiber and a glass fiber in a filter medium or element. A slurry of this combination of fibers can be used to form a layer. Once heated to the correct fusion temperature and cured the layer forms a mechanically stable medium. The medium can be used in a filter element having unique filtration properties unlike those of thin cellulosic or synthetic paper layers, or other mist collection systems or other thick fibrous media.
The unique filter medium of the invention may have a thickness of greater than 3 millimeters, which may be made in one step, and comprises a bicomponent fiber. Such filter medium can be manufactured using only bicomponent fiber, but can also contain other materials. Other fibers may be used, most preferably glass fibers. Two or more different kinds of glass fibers may be used advantageously in a single filter medium. Thermoplastic fibers, binder resins, natural fibers, particulate matter, or other filtration components may be advantageous to use along with, or instead of glass fibers depending on the application contemplated. Desirable materials that can add functionality to the filters of the invention include carbon particles or fibers, metal particles or fibers, silica or other ceramic particles, ion exchange resins, catalysts, enzymes, and zeolites. Further, chemical modification of the surface of fibers and/or particles may be employed advantageously, for example by reacting glass fibers with a silane coupling agent to modify surface energy either prior to, or after, inclusion of the glass fibers in the filters of the present invention. Other additive compounds may add functionality, such as antistatic or flame retardant compounds.
The invention may comprise a filter unit comprising the bicomponent fiber medium of the invention in combination with a perforate support that can be formed in a housing with other conventional filtration components. The perforate support may be made from any suitable material, such as metal or plastic, depending on the intended application. The filter unit may also comprise end caps, housings, or other conventional filter unit parts.
A method of removing a particulate from a fluid medium can use the steps of introducing the fluid medium having entrained particulate into contact with the filter medium passing the mobile fluid through the filter medium wherein the particulate is retained by the filter medium leaving a purified fluid exiting the medium. While removal of oily aerosol from a stream of air is particularly preferred and demonstrated, the skilled artisan will understand that the invention also contemplates filtration of particulates from liquids such as water, soot removal from air, and a variety of other applications generally known in the art of filtration.
A method of removing typically a liquid aerosol entrained in an air stream is for aerosol particulate to contact the fibrous medium, coating the fibrous interior of the medium and accumulating on and within the fibrous interior. As the liquid accumulates within the filter, gravity will cause the liquid to drain from the filter medium. Such media are often used in conjunction with a reservoir into which the liquid drains and can be removed continually or in a batch-wise fashion.
Multiple layered filters, wherein each layer has a different composition, thickness, or density, may be made with ease by employing the methods of the invention. Various layers may also contain functional materials. For example, one layer may have a greater permeability than another, and a different layer may contain activated charcoal. Multiple layers are achieved with ease by virtue of the flexibility of the process for making the filters of the present invention.
The unique media of this invention can be used in a variety of filtration processes including, but not limited to, removal of particulate matter from air or other gas phase materials such as nitrogen, natural gas, oxygen, and the like; particulate removal from a liquid phase material, such as water, hydraulic fluid, diesel fuel, gasoline, crankcase oil, ethanol and the like; removal of fine particulates such as smoke, exhaust particles, dust, asbestos, silica, clay, water vapor, oil vapor, metal vapor, and the like; removal of nonparticulate impurities such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from air or water; or removal of ozone from air.
The filter media of this invention is particularly useful in separating an entrained liquid aerosol from a mobile air phase. The media of the invention has excellent characteristics of removal of oily aerosol, for example, from a fluid stream that is largely made of air and aerosol. Thus, when a stream of air having between 2000 and 9000 ppm of oily aerosol per ppm of total fluid, more typically about 7000 ppm of oily aerosol per ppm of total fluid, is passed through the filter at 60 to 100 psi, less than or equal to 2 ppm of the aerosol remains in the air stream after filtration after a period as long as 1000 hours and after 4000 hours is able to remove the aerosol leaving less than or equal to 3 ppm or less of the aerosol in the mobile air phase after 4000 hours. The media of the invention is capable of maintaining a substantially low pressure drop over the lifetime of the media under these same conditions, wherein the lifetime can extend as long as 8000 hours. The pressure drop over the media during normal operating conditions as outlined above is less than 2 psi increase over 200 hours and is less than 1 psi additionally over a subsequent period of 7000 hours.
In a preferred embodiment, the filter medium of the invention has a permeability of about 1 to about 2 CFM, a basis weight of about 2,500 to about 3,000 gram/meter2, a preferred thickness of about 8 to about 20 millimeters, and in typical filtration applications, removes the liquid aerosol from the air stream such that little or no aerosol penetrates the medium. We have found that less than 20 ppm, often less than 10 ppm and most often less than 5 ppm of the liquid aerosol penetrates the medium under typical operating conditions using the media of the invention.
We have further found that the media of the invention has substantially improved burst characteristics. In other words, under the force obtained from the pressure of the air flow through the media, that the media of the invention has the ability to withstand substantially increased pressure force during the lifetime of the media than prior structures. The strengths of the bicomponent/glass fiber media is such that it can survive pressure with a burst strength of at least 10 psi, more preferably about 25 to about 40 psi when measured according to ASTM D774 specifications.
The unique filter media of the invention typically is manufactured employing a wet laid process. The process involves adding bicomponent fiber to an aqueous media to form slurry, forming the slurry into a layer of fiber, and curing and drying the layer to form the filter media. Such media can be used for general filtration purposes, but particularly is useful in separating a liquid aerosol from an air stream. Bicomponent fiber is a known material in which the fiber contains an amount of polymer having a relatively high melting point and a second amount of a polymer having a relatively low melting point. In the formation of a layer, the fiber is heated to a temperature such that the low melting point polymer can melt, fuse and bind the layer into a mechanically stable, unitary mass. The relatively high melting point polymer component can provide mechanical strength and stability to the layer.
Glass fiber is preferably employed along with the bicomponent fiber and may be added along with the bicomponent fiber in the slurry. The use of glass fiber in conjunction with the bicomponent fiber provides control over the filtration properties for certain applications. However, glass fiber is not a requirement for making the filters of the invention. Bicomponent fiber alone may be formed into a filter of the invention. Additionally, materials such as thermoplastic fibers, inorganic fibers, particles, binder resins, or other additives may be included in the filter making slurry to form a filter having functionality tailored for the application contemplated. Such materials may be included in addition to, or instead of, glass fiber.
In selecting the bicomponent fiber, various combinations of polymers may be useful in the present invention, but it is important that the first polymer component melt at a temperature lower than the melting temperature of the second polymer component and typically below 200° C. Further, the bicomponent fibers are integrally mixed and evenly dispersed with other materials in the filter making slurry. Melting of the first polymer component of the bicomponent fiber is necessary to allow the bicomponent fibers to form a tacky skeletal structure, which upon cooling, binds to other bicomponent fibers as well as other fibers or particles in the formed filter layer.
Bicomponent fibers having a sheath-core structure are particularly useful in making the filters of the invention. In the sheath-core structure, the low melting point (e.g., about 80 to 200° C.) thermoplastic is typically extruded around a fiber of the higher melting (e.g., about 200 to 260° C.) point material. In use, the bicomponent fibers typically have a fiber diameter of about 5 to 50 micrometers often about 10 to 20 micrometers and typically in a fiber form generally have a length of 0.1 to 20 millimeters or often have a length of about 0.2 to about 15 millimeters. Any thermoplastic that can have an appropriate melting point can be used in the low melting component of the bicomponent fiber while higher melting polymers can be used in the higher melting “core” portion of the fiber.
The cross-sectional structure of such fibers can be, as discussed above, the “sheath-core” structure, or other structures that provide the same thermal bonding function, such as “side-by-side” structures or lobed fibers where the fiber tips have lower melting point polymer. The value of the bicomponent fiber is that the relatively low-temperature melting resin can melt under sheet, media, or filter forming conditions to act to bind the bicomponent fiber, and other fibers present in the sheet, media, or filter making material into a mechanically stable sheet, media, or filter. Once melted and fused to other fibers or particles in the filter media of the invention, the stability of the structure is manifested in the observation that there is no migration of materials in the filter. Such migration is typically seen in filters made using glass fiber and binder resins.
Typically, the polymers of the bicomponent fibers are made up of different thermoplastic materials. For example, polyolefin/polyester (sheath/core) bicomponent fibers may be used, such that the polyolefin, e.g. polyethylene sheath, melts at a temperature lower than the polyester, e.g. polyethylene terephthalate core. Typical thermoplastic polymers having useful melting points for use either in a high or low melting portion can include polyolefins, e.g. polyethylene, polypropylene, polybutylene, and copolymers thereof, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyesters, e.g. polyethylene terephthalate, polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl chloride acetate, polyvinyl butyral, acrylic resins, e.g. polyacrylate, and polymethylacrylate, polymethylmethacrylate, polyamides, namely nylon, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylidene chloride, polystyrene, polyvinyl alcohol, polyurethanes, cellulosic resins, namely cellulosic nitrate, cellulosic acetate, cellulosic acetate butyrate, ethyl cellulose, etc., copolymers of any of the above materials, e.g. ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, ethylene-acrylic acid copolymers, styrene-butadiene block copolymers, KRATON® rubbers available from Kraton Polymers U.S. LLC of Houston, Tex., and the like.
Particularly preferred in the present invention is a bicomponent fiber known as Advansa 271P, a 14 micrometer diameter fiber available from EXSA Americas, New York, N.Y. Other useful fibers include FIT 201 (available from Fiber Innovation Technology, Inc. of Johnson City, Tenn.), Kuraray N720 (available from the Kuraray Co., Ltd. of Osaka, Japan) and similar commercially available materials. All of these commercially available bicomponent fibers can facilitate the cross-linking of a filter construction of the current invention by melting and fusing a sheath polymer to other fibers of the filter construction.
Selection of melting points for the portion of the bicomponent fiber that melts and fuses to bind the layer mechanically is important. In any filtration application, the mobile fluid will have an operating temperature. Mobile fluids of a high operating temperature such as lubricant oil, hydraulic fluid, etc. must be used with a filtration medium having fibers with a thermal characteristic such that the material does not melt at operating temperatures. The filter medium made using glass fiber and bicomponent fiber tends to be relatively temperature stable due to the presence of a relatively large mass of glass and polymer. However, relatively little experimentation is needed to determine the temperature at which the lower temperature polymer might initiate failure of the medium when exposed to high temperature mobile fluids in the filtration operation. The bicomponent fiber can then be selected in order to obtain a dimensionally and mechanically stable filtration medium in the presence of the target fluid temperature.
The preferred glass fiber used in media of the present invention include glass types known to those skilled in the art by their designations: A, C, D, E, Zero Boron E, ECR, AR, R, S, S-2, N, and the like. Generally, the skilled artisan will recognize that any glass that can be made into fibers either by drawing processes used for making reinforcement fibers or by spinning processes used for making thermal insulation fibers. Such fibers are typically about 0.1 to 50 micrometers (μm) in diameter, more typically about 0.2 to 20 μm, and have aspect ratio of about 10 to 10,000. These commercially available fibers can be sized with a sizing coating or can be unsized. Such coatings cause the otherwise ionically neutral glass fibers to form and remain in bundles. Glass fiber in diameter less than about 1.0 micron is not sized. Large diameter chopped glass is typically sized. The sizing composition and cationic antistatic agent eliminates fiber agglomeration and permits a uniform dispersion of the glass fibers upon agitation of the dispersion in the tank.
The typical amount of glass fibers for effective dispersion in the glass slurry is between about 5% to about 80%, more preferably about 50 to about 80%, by weight of the solids in the dispersion. Blends of glass fibers can substantially aid in improving permeability of the materials. We have found that a useful filtration medium can be made by combining bicomponent fiber and glass fiber. Such media, depending on glass content and glass fiber size can obtain permeability, efficiency, and filter lifetime sufficient for a number of applications. In applications involving removal of a liquid aerosol from a mobile air stream, a medium comprising a bicomponent fiber in combination with a relatively larger glass fiber with a relatively smaller glass fiber can obtain a useful and highly active filtration media. Such media contains a glass fiber that contains a substantial proportion of a glass fiber having a diameter of greater than about 1 micron and a substantial amount of a glass fiber having a fiber diameter of less than 1.0 micron.
The combination of bicomponent fiber and glass fiber can be formed into a useful layer which can be fused by heat into a mechanically stable useful filter medium. While no additional binder in the form of fiber or resin is generally needed for such structures, this invention contemplates the use of additional binder materials when needed for a specific application. Binder resins can comprise water-soluble, solvent borne, or latex based materials. Binder materials may be provided in dry form, in a solvent, or in an aqueous dispersion. Such useful polymer materials include acrylic polymers, ethylene vinyl acetate polymers, ethylene vinyl polyvinyl alcohol, ethylene vinyl alcohol polymers, polyvinyl pyrrolidone polymers, and natural gums and resins useful in aqueous solution.
Latex-based binders may also be used to bind together the filter media of the present invention. Latex binders can be selected from various latex adhesives known in the art. The skilled artisan can select the particular latex adhesive depending upon the type of fibers that are to be bound. The latex adhesive may be applied by known techniques such as spraying or foaming. Generally, latex adhesives having from 15 to 25% solids are used. The dispersion can be made by dispersing the fibers and then adding the binder material or dispersing the binder material and then adding the fibers. The dispersion can, also, be made by combining a dispersion of fibers with a dispersion of the binder material. The concentration of total fibers in the dispersion can range from 0.01 to 5 or 0.005 to 2 weight percent based on the total weight of the dispersion. The concentration of binder material in the dispersion can range from 10 to 50 weight percent based on the total weight of the fibers.
Alternatively, a binder resin may be delivered from a solvent other than water. Solvent borne binders may be advantageous where a particular resin cannot be delivered from water, but the properties of the resin are highly desirable. Solvent delivery is also necessary where the polymer is reactive toward water, and the reaction should be prevented prior to contact with the filter fibers. Non-limiting examples of suitable solvents for delivery of binder resins include acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, toluene, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, methylene chloride, dichloromethane, hexane, cyclohexane, tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, mixtures thereof and mixtures with water, and the like. Polymers that are usefully delivered from water can include, but are not limited to, phenolic resins, polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl alcohol, acrylic resins, methacrylic resins, polyurethanes, cyanoacrylates, epoxies, melamine resins, and polycaprolactones.
Useful examples of commercially available solvent borne binders include phenolic resins available from Dynea of Helsinki, Finland, and Ashland, Inc. of Covington, Ky., among others; polyvinyl acetate available from Rohm & Haas Company of Philadelphia, Pa., H.B. Fuller Company of Vadnais Heights, Minn., and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. of Allentown, Pa., among others; polyvinyl alcohol available from Rohm & Haas, Dow Chemical Co. of Midland, Mich., Reichhold, Inc. of Research Triangle Park, N.C., and Hexion Specialty Chemicals of Columbus, Ohio, among others; acrylic resins available from Rohm & Haas Company of Philadelphia, Pa., H.B. Fuller Company of Vadnais Heights, Minn., and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. of Allentown, Pa., among others; methacrylic resins available from Ciba Specialty Chemicals (Araldite® resins) of Tarrytown, N.Y., Dow Chemical Co. of Midland, Mich., Hexion Specialty Chemicals of Columbus, Ohio, and Reichhold, Inc. of Research Triangle Park, N.C., among others; polyurethanes available from Dow Chemical Co. of Midland, Mich. and Ciba Specialty Chemicals of Tarrytown, N.Y., among others; cyanoacrylates available from Henkel Loctite of Rocky Hill, Conn.; epoxies available from Dow Chemical Co. of Midland, Mich., Hexion Specialty Chemicals of Columbus, Ohio, and Ciba Specialty Chemicals of Tarrytown, N.Y., among others; melamine resins available from Ciba Specialty Chemicals of Tarrytown, N.Y., Cytec Industries, Inc. (Cymel®) of West Paterson, N.J., and Hexion Specialty Chemicals of Columbus, Ohio, among others; and polycaprolactones available from Solvay America Inc. (Capa®) of Houston, Tex.
Binder resins such as those described above can be used to help bond such media fibers into a mechanically stable filter medium. Such thermoplastic binder resin materials can be used as a dry powder or solvent system, but are typically aqueous dispersions (a latex or one of a number of lattices) of vinyl thermoplastic resins. A resinous binder component is not necessary to obtain adequate strength for the filter construction of this invention, but can be used to help bond thermoplastic fibers into the filter media matrix. Resin used as binder can be in the form of water soluble or dispersible polymer added directly to the filter-making dispersion or in the form of thermoplastic binder fibers of the resin material intermingled with other fibers of the filter making slurry to be activated as a binder by heat applied after the filter media is formed.
Media fibers may also be incorporated into the filter media of the present invention. Media fibers are fibers that can aid in filtration or in forming a structural media layer. Such fiber may be made from a number of hydrophilic, hydrophobic, oleophilic, and oleophobic materials. Media fibers may be present with or without glass fibers in the filter media of the present invention. When needed, these fibers cooperate with the bicomponent fiber and any other components present in the slurry to form a mechanically stable, but strong, permeable filtration media that can withstand the mechanical stress of the passage of fluid materials and can maintain the loading of particulate during use. Such fibers are typically monocomponent fibers with a diameter that can range from about 0.1 to about 50 micrometers and can be made from a variety of materials including naturally occurring cotton, linen, wool, various cellulosic and proteinaceous natural fibers, synthetic fibers including rayon, acrylic, aramid nylon, polyolefin, polyester fibers.
One type of media fiber is a binder fiber that cooperates with other components to bind the materials into a sheet. Another type a structural fiber cooperates with other components to increase the tensile and burst strength the materials in dry and wet conditions. Yet another type of media fiber is one that enhances the entrapment of specific components during filtration of the fluid stream.
Useful media fiber materials include, but are not limited to, polyester fibers, polyamide fibers, aramid fibers, polypropylene fibers, copolyetherester fibers, polyethylene terephthalate fibers, polybutylene terephthalate fibers, polypropylene fibers, polyethylene fibers, polyvinyl acetate fibers, polyvinyl alcohol fibers (including various hydrolysis of polyvinyl alcohol such as 88% hydrolyzed, 95% hydrolyzed, 98% hydrolyzed and 99.5% hydrolyzed polymers), polylactic acid fibers, polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) fibers, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) fibers, liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) fibers, and mixtures thereof. Polyamide fibers include, but are not limited to, nylon 6, 66, 11, 12, 612, and high temperature “nylons” (such as nylon 46). Further, cellulosic fibers such as cotton, viscose rayon, and other common fiber types may be used in some embodiments of the current invention. The thermoplastic fibers are generally fine (about 0.5-20 denier diameter), short (about 0.1-5 cm long), staple fibers, possibly containing precompounded conventional additives, such as antioxidant, stabilizers, lubricants, tougheners, etc. In addition, the thermoplastic fibers may be surface treated with a dispersing aid. The preferred thermoplastic fibers are polyamide and polyethylene terephthalate fibers, with the most preferred being polyethylene terephthalate fibers.
Media fibers can also include inorganic fibers such as carbon/graphite fiber, metal fiber, metal oxide fiber, ceramic fiber, and combinations thereof.
The filter media of the present invention also contemplates the use of functional materials for specific filtration needs. Functional materials may be particulates of silica, clay, carbon, powdered metals or metal oxides; glass micro-spheres, ceramics, thermoplastic or thermoset resin particles or fibers; catalysts such as Hopcalite type air purification catalysts, e.g. Carulite® Catalyst available from the Cams Corporation of Peru, Ill.; or other structures such as carbon nanotubes, zeolites, enzymes that are free or bound to polymeric backbones, or ion exchange resins. Any material capable of being entrained in the filter making slurry may be used, where a specific application may require the use of a specialized filtration component.
The filter media of the present invention also contemplates the use of fiber treatments to modify the surface properties of the fibers or affect the bulk properties of the filter media. Surface properties of glass fibers, bicomponent fibers, or other materials present in the filter media may be modified. Acidic or basic compounds may be added to the slurry; reactive materials that affect the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity may be employed either in the slurry or by a post-treatment after fusing the bicomponent fibers; flame retardants may be entrained; surface finish chemicals may be used; or antistatic agents may be employed. For example, hexamethyl disilazane (HMDZ) may be sprayed onto the formed filter or added by dipping the formed filter in a solution of HMDZ; HMDZ can react with e.g. glass fibers to provide a surface having trimethylsilyl functionality, thereby rendering the glass surface hydrophobic. Other agents may be employed to affect surface energy of the fibers in the filter media of the present invention.
The media of the invention can be made using any system that can accumulate the fiber into a thick layer. The media of the invention can be made into any shape that can be formed using the fibers of the invention. Useful forms of such a layer are flat media, cylindrical media, and the like.
The technologies used in media making are typically related to papermaking processes adapted to thicker layers. The skilled artisan will appreciate that papermaking processes known as wet laid processes are particularly useful and many of the fiber components are designed for aqueous dispersion processing. The machines that can be used in wet laid sheet making include hand laid sheet equipment, Fourdrinier papermaking machines, cylindrical papermaking machines, inclined papermaking machines, combination papermaking machines and other machines that can take a properly mixed slurry of components, form a layer or layers of the components of the needed thickness, and remove the fluid aqueous components to form a wet sheet. Wet-laid manufacturing of the media/elements of the present invention typically comprises the following steps:
The skilled artisan will recognize that an advantageous aspect of the current invention is that no further media processing is necessary. After carrying out the foregoing manufacturing steps, the formed filter media are ready for incorporation into a filtration assembly. The skilled artisan will appreciate that a finished filter assembly can comprise end caps, housings, and the like, and that the method of assembly and the parts required for assembly will depend on the intended end use.
Once sufficiently dried and processed to filtration media, the sheets are typically about 5 to 50 millimeters in thickness, have a pore size of about 0.55 to about 50 micrometers, a basis weight of about 50.0 to about 3,000.0 grams/meter2 or about 50.0 to about 1,000.0 grams/meter2, a solidity of about 4.0 to about 7.0%, and a permeability of about 0.5 to about 200 fpm.
In some embodiments, the filter media of the invention may be formed as a substantially planar web or a mat. The web or mat may further be coated with a binder by conventional means, e.g., by a flood and extract method and passed through a drying section which dries the mat and cures the binder, and thermally bonds the sheet, media, or filter. The resulting web or mat may be collected in a large roll or left substantially flat as formed
The filter media of the invention can also be formed into a variety of geometric shapes using forms to hold the wet composition during thermal bonding. In forming shaped media, a layer is formed by dispersing fibers in an aqueous system, and forming the filter on a mandrel with the aid of a vacuum. The formed structure is then dried and bonded in an oven. By using a slurry to form the filter, this process provides the flexibility to form several structures, such as cylinders, tubes, cones, and ovals.
The filter media of the present invention can further be formed as multilayer filter media having different components in the different layers. For example, a first layer of filter media may be formed using the above techniques and materials, and formed into the desired shape and thickness, pore size, etc. After the oven drying step, the filter media may be immersed in a second slurry having a different composition to result in e.g. different permeability from the first layer, or by imparting functionality such as by incorporating activated charcoal. The manufacturing process is thus repeated to provide a two-layer filter. In this manner, multiple filter layers may be added.
Similarly, instead of immersing the filter media in a second slurry after the first oven drying step, the second slurry may be applied after vacuum drying but before the final oven drying step; in this manner, multiple layers may be deposited to the filter media, followed by a single oven drying step that is carried out after some or all of the filter media layers have been applied.
Thus, multiple layers may incorporate differing pore sizes, different permeability, different fiber materials to filter different specific components, or addition of other additives such as particulates to different layers. The skilled artisan will appreciate the ability of a multiply layered filter media of the present invention to filter several specific particle types or sizes using one filter assembly, or alternatively to provide a media that both filters particles and entraps airborne chemicals on a molecular scale, or media that combines any number of the uses contemplated by various embodiments of the invention into a single assembly.
Certain preferred arrangements according to the present invention include filter media as generally defined, in an overall filter construction. Some preferred arrangements for such use comprise the media arranged in a cylindrical, pleated configuration with the pleats extending generally longitudinally, i.e. in the same direction as a longitudinal axis of the cylindrical pattern. For such arrangements, the media may be imbedded in end caps, as with conventional filters. Such arrangements may include upstream liners and downstream liners if desired, for typical conventional purposes.
The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the composition of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” include single and plural referents unless clearly dictated otherwise by specific specification or claim language. Thus, for example, reference to a composition containing “a compound” includes a mixture of two or more compounds.
Herein when reference is made to efficiency, unless otherwise specified, reference is meant to efficiency when measured according to ASTM-1215-89, with 0.78 g monodisperse polystyrene spherical particles, at 20 fpm (6.1 meters/min) as described herein. However, efficiency may be specified to mean efficiency as measured by the DOP efficiency test which is described in detail below.
1. Permeability:
As discussed in the examples set forth below, permeability relates to the quantity of air (ft3-min−1, or CFM) that will flow through a filter medium at a pressure drop of 0.5 inches of water. In general, permeability as the term is used is assessed by the Frazier Permeability Test according to ASTM D737 using a Frazier Permeability Tester available from Frazier Precision Instrument Co. Inc., Gaithersburg, Md. or a TexTest 3300 or TexTest 3310 available from Advanced Testing Instruments Corp (ATI), 243 East Black Stock Rd. Suite 2, Spartanburg, S.C. 29301, (864)989-0566, www.aticorporation.com.
2. Pore Size:
Pore size means mean flow pore diameter determined using a capillary flow porometer instrument such as a Model APP 1200 AEXSC sold by Porus Materials, Inc., Cornell University Research Park, Bldg. 4.83 Brown Road, Ithaca, new York 14850-1298, 1-800-825-5764, www.pmiapp.com. A sample of filter media is cut to 2.24 cm outer diameter and mounted on a specimen holder. The specimen holder is open at the top and the filter is mounted in the bottom of a well that is 1.90 cm deep. On the underside of the specimen is a chamber open to a path to a manometer, an air bleed needle, and a compressed air source. The air bleed valve is opened and the compressed air turned on to a level whereby the manometer reads 7.6±1.3 cm. The well is filled with reagent grade isopropanol, and the air bleed valve is slowly closed until a bubble appears in the well containing isopropanol. The manometer reading is recorded at the first bubble sighting and the pressure recorded is used to calculate pore size. This measurement is repeated for five repetitions.
3. Filtration Efficiency (DOP) Test:
A 6-inch wide strip of filter media is mounted in the chuck of a TSI 8160 Automated Filter Tester, available from TSI Incorporated of Shoreview, Minn. Dried air is fed with latex particles and this mixture of air and particles is applied at a pressure of 70 psi across the filter media. The face velocity of the air stream is set by adjusting the flow rate of the air/particle mixture as well as the opening size of the chuck. For example, a flow rate of 32 fpm through a chuck size of 100 cm2 will result in a face velocity against the filter sample in the chuck of 5.334 cm/sec (or 10.5 fpm). In this manner, face velocities ranging from 0.35 fpm to 82 fpm may be achieved.
Particle sizes used in the test were 0.03, 0.05, 0.07, 0.09 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 microns in diameter. The concentration of particles in the stream was about 6800 parts per million parts of air flow across the media. The concentration of each particle size in the effluent air is measured, so that the percent of each particle size trapped by the filter at the designated flow rate can be measured. The overall efficiency is the total percent of particles trapped by the filter apparatus. Each particle size is measured, so efficiency as a function of particle size can also be determined.
A filter medium of the invention, FM-1, was made using the following technique. Into 250 gallons of untreated tap water was mixed Advansa 271P bicomponent fiber (obtained from EXSA Americas, New York, N.Y.), Evanite #610 glass fiber, and Evanite #608 glass fiber (both obtained from the Evanite Fiber Corporation of Corvallis, Oreg.) such that the relative weight of the components are as shown in Table 1. Mixing was carried out with a 2 HP rotating paddle mixer for between 30 and 45 minutes to obtain an aqueous slurry of fibers. The slurry was then vacuum formed onto a 5.25″×9″ perforated metal cylinder by completely immersing the cylinder in the slurry and holding it under a vacuum of approximately 20 inches Hg for 3-10 seconds.
The formed media was then retracted from the slurry and vacuum was maintained for 15-30 s. The media was removed from the vacuum fixture and placed in a vented oven. The oven temperature was set to 300° C. Residence time in the oven was approximately 35 minutes. The filter media was cooled to room temperature at ambient conditions.
After removing from the oven and cooling, FM-1 was 2.29 cm thick. The basis weight of FM-1 was measured as 2645 grams/meter2 (g/M2). The initial permeability of FM-1 was found to be 1.3 ft/min.
A filter medium of the present invention, hereafter referred to as FM-2, was made using the filter making process of Example 1. The components of the filter slurry are shown in Table 2.
After the oven drying step, FM-2 was 0.84 cm thick. FM-2 was found to have a basis weight of 1187 g/M2. The initial air permeability of FM-2 was determined to be 1.4 feet/minute (fpm).
A filter medium of the present invention, hereafter referred to as FM-3, was made using the filter making process of Example 1. The components of the filter were bicomponent fibers and carbon particles, added to the slurry at a ratio of approximately 1:1 by weight. The bicomponent fibers were DuPont-271 fibers. The carbon particles were Calgon MD5695, 50-200 mesh activated carbon particles from a coconut powder source, obtained from the Calgon Carbon Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. The particles were mixed directly into the slurry with no prior treatment or washing. After the oven drying step, the filter was analyzed for weight percent of the components. The components of the filter are shown in Table 3. Micrographs of the inside and side views of FM-3 are shown in
The available surface area of the MD5695 particles and the FM-3 filter media containing 50% MD5695 particles were measured using Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) nitrogen adsorption isotherm (BET; see S. Brunauer, P. H. Emmett and E. Teller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1938, 60, 309.) Samples were placed in a sampling tube and out-gassed overnight under vacuum at 60° C. The sample was run under standard continuous flow conditions using a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 instrument (available from Micromeritics Corporation of Norcross, Ga.). The following measurements were made:
The available surface area of the carbon particles alone were compared to the surface area of the particles entrained in FM-3. The results of BET testing are shown in Table 4. The results show that the particles entrained in the filter of the invention did not show a significant decrease in available surface area when incorporated in the filter using the wet-laid technique described above.
A filter medium of the present invention, hereafter referred to as FM-4, was made using the filter making process above. The components of the filter were DuPont-271 bicomponent fibers and “media type #3” carbon fibers obtained from CarboPur Technologies, Inc. of Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The carbon fibers are approximately 12-14 micrometers in diameter. These two components were added to the slurry at a ratio of approximately 1:1 by weight. The carbon fibers were mixed directly into the slurry with no prior treatment or washing. After the oven drying step, the filter was analyzed for weight percent of the components and the filter was found to comprise 1:1 bicomponent fibers to carbon fibers by weight.
A filter medium of the present invention, hereafter referred to as FM-5, was made using the filter making process of Example 1 above except that the filter was made in two steps using two slurries of differing composition. The first slurry was formed into a layer as described above. This sample also employed Lauscha EC-6, a 6 μm glass fiber, available from the Lauscha Fiber International Corp. of Summerville S.C. The weight of the components of slurry 1 is shown in Table 5 below.
A second layer was added to the first by interrupting the first filter making procedure at the point where the layer would otherwise go into the oven. At this point the support with the first layer was immersed in the second slurry, slurry 2, and the filter making process repeated; the layers were placed in the vented oven as described in Example 1 above. Slurry 2 also differed from the first in that 83 gallons of tap water were used instead of 250 gallons as described in Example 1. The weight of the components of slurry 2 is shown in Table 5.
After the oven drying step, the basis weight of FM-5 was measured to be 1489 g/M2. The Frazier permeability of FM-5 was found to be between 1.35 and 1.5 CFM at 0.5 inches.
A filter medium of the present invention, hereinafter referred to as FM-6, was made using the same procedure as used in Example 5 to make FM-5, except that two oven drying steps were employed. The first oven drying step was carried out after the first layer of fibers from slurry 1 was applied; the second oven drying step was carried out after the second layer of fibers from slurry 2 was applied. The composition of Layer 1 of FM-6 was determined to be 70% DuPont-271 fibers and 30% Evanite® #610 glass fibers. The composition of Layer 2 of FM-6 was determined to be 71.4 DuPont-271 fibers and 28.6% 3 denier crimped polyester fibers, obtained from Wellman, Inc. of Fort Mill, S.C.
DOP efficiency testing was carried out on filter media of the invention and compared to a control filter media sample. The control sample, hereinafter referred to as CONTROL, was a wet laid filter medium using conventional technology to provide a filter media of glass fibers and an aqueous binder material. CONTROL media was obtained from the Donaldson Company of Minneapolis, Minn. under the part number P046257. CONTROL is 1.17 cm thick, has a basis weight of 1526 g/M2, and permeability of 1.5 ft/min.
DOP efficiency was measured at 10.5 fpm flow rate for FM-2, FM-5, and CONTROL. The results are shown in Table 6.
FM-1 was incorporated into a functioning oil coalescer for long term testing in an oil coalescing application. A standard polyurethane potting compound, such as any such compounds commonly used in the filtration industry, for example materials sold under the trade name Sentrol® (available from the General Electric Company of Schenectady, N.Y.) or urethane potting products sold by the Epoxies, Etc. of Cranston, R.I. or PottingSolutions Company of Aurora, Colo., was applied into an open (top) end cap part. A coalescing media, such as media sold under the trade name PERFORMAX® (available from the NATCO Group, Inc. of Houston, Tex.) or the trade name Q-PAC® (available from Lantec Products, Inc. of Agoura Hills, Calif.) that has been encapsulated in between two expanded metal screens was inserted into the end cap. The vacuum formed filter media FM-1 was inserted into the end cap, assuring a gap of approximately ¼ inch exists between the coalescing media and the vacuum formed filter media.
The potting compound was activated by heating in an oven according to manufacturers specifications, to secure the two concentric media packs. After activation, the partially formed functioning coalescers were allowed to cool to ambient temperature.
Polyurethane potting compound was then applied to the closed (bottom) end cap, and the partially formed functioning coalescers were inserted into the closed end cap, such that the concentric media packs were positioned to maintain the ¼ inch gap. The newly applied potting compound was activated by heating in an oven according to manufacturers specifications, to secure the fully formed functioning coalescers. After activation, the functioning coalescers were allowed to cool to ambient temperature.
In the same manner, CONTROL was formed into a functioning coalescer prior to further testing.
The functioning coalescers made from vacuum formed media FM-1 and CONTROL samples, as described in Example 7, were subjected to long-term testing by mounting the coalescers into a Sullair LS-10 industrial air compressor (available from the Sullair Company of Michigan City, Ind.) and running the compressor at discharge pressures of 60 psi and 100 psi over an 8000 hour period. Discharge temperature was measured periodically over the duration of the test. Additionally, during the test each sample was periodically removed from the compressor and tested for oil carryover, pressure drop across the filter, corrected air flow as determined by discharge pressure of the effluent air, and DOP efficiency. The results from the 8000 hour test are shown for FM-1 in Table 7, and for CONTROL in Table 8. The results of oil carryover, pressure drop, and corrected flow for FM-1 and CONTROL, as well as discharge temperature for FM-1, are graphically represented in
The results show that FM-1 had superior properties of oil retention, as oil carryover was significantly less than for CONTROL; that FM-1 had similar pressure drop to CONTROL, even though it entrapped more oil than did CONTROL; and the corrected flow was essentially unchanged for FM-1 throughout the 8000 hour test; and that FM-1 had acceptable discharge temperature over the duration of the test.
Mechanical properties were measured for FM-1 and CONTROL using 1.27 cm thick samples of each filter medium. Burst strength was measured for FM-1 and CONTROL using a TMI Monitor Burst 200 Mullen Burst Tester (available from the Standex Engraving Group of Chicopee, Mass.), in compliance with TAPPI T403 and ASTM D774 specifications. The burst strength of CONTROL was measured to be 14-20 psi. The burst strength of FM-1 was measured to be 37-49 psid.
Stress-strain properties of the filter media of the present invention were measured using a Sintech Model M3000 W tester, available from the MTS Systems Corporation of Eden Prairie, Minn. Stress-strain properties were measured using a 200 lb load cell and a strain rate of 1 inch/min until break. Samples were cut using a dog-bone shape die with neck proportion of 1.5 inches×0.5 inches. All samples were tested in the axial direction, cross-machine direction, and 45 degrees from machine direction. Unless noted, no differences were observed among the samples cut in different directions.
The elongation at break was 0.44% for CONTROL, while the elongation at break for FM-1 was 10.97%. The tensile strength was determined to be 94.3 psi for CONTROL and 130.5 psi for FM-1. The results of the tensile test are shown in
While the invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modifications and this application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come with known or customary practice within the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth and as follows in scope of the appended claims.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/036,022, entitled “FORMED FILTER ELEMENT”, filed Feb. 22, 2008, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/903,179, filed Feb. 23, 2007 and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2764602 | Ahlbrecht et al. | Sep 1956 | A |
| 2764603 | Ahlbrecht et al. | Sep 1956 | A |
| 2801706 | Asker | Aug 1957 | A |
| 2803656 | Ahlbrecht et al. | Aug 1957 | A |
| 3073735 | Till et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
| 3147064 | Brown et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3255131 | Ahlbrecht et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
| 3279151 | Kauer et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
| 3303621 | Hill | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3450755 | Ahlbrecht et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
| 3505794 | Nutter et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
| 3589956 | Krantz et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3595731 | Davies et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3616160 | Wincklhofer et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3616183 | Brayford et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3620819 | Croce | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3639195 | Sanders | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3653181 | Becker | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3705480 | Wireman | Dec 1972 | A |
| 3714763 | Suzuki | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3728848 | Vest, Jr. | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3744256 | Cobb et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3891417 | Wade | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3917448 | Wood et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3934238 | Pavlou | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3937860 | Gusman et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3972694 | Head | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3998988 | Shimomai et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4042522 | Falk | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4045350 | Kupf et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4047914 | Hansen et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4069158 | Bertocchio et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4069244 | Mueller | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4079675 | Beumel, Jr. | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4088726 | Cumbers | May 1978 | A |
| 4090967 | Falk | May 1978 | A |
| 4102785 | Head et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4111815 | Walker et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4160059 | Samejima | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4161422 | Lawson et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4161590 | Mueller | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4161602 | Mueller | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4169754 | Perrotta | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4177141 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4189338 | Ejima et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4210540 | Perrotta | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4211819 | Kunimune et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4231768 | Seibert et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4234655 | Kunimune et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4239278 | Skilliter, Jr. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4239516 | Klein | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4254731 | Taylor | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4267016 | Okazaki et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4269888 | Ejima et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4272318 | Walker et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4274914 | Keith et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4309475 | Hoffman, Jr. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4318774 | Powell et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4321108 | Goddard et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4327936 | Sekiguchi | May 1982 | A |
| 4370152 | Luper | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4388086 | Bauer et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4423995 | Karis | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4429001 | Kolpin et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4443233 | Moran | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4457974 | Summers | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4487617 | Dienes et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4500384 | Tomioka et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4501598 | Long | Feb 1985 | A |
| RE31849 | Klein | Mar 1985 | E |
| 4504289 | Waller et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4536440 | Berg | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4545789 | Lato | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4548624 | Waller | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4551378 | Carey, Jr. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4552603 | Harris, Jr. et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4555430 | Mays | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4579774 | Kuwazuru et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4597218 | Friemel et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4604205 | Ayers | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4610678 | Weisman et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4627863 | Klein | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4657804 | Mays et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4659467 | Spearman | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4661132 | Thornton et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4676807 | Miller et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4677929 | Harris | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4681801 | Eian et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4684576 | Tabor et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4688511 | Gerlach et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4689057 | Gasper | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4713285 | Klein | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4726817 | Roger | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4729371 | Krueger et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4732809 | Harris, Jr. et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4734208 | Pall et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4764189 | Yanagawa et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4765812 | Homonoff et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4765915 | Diehl | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4807619 | Dyrud et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4814033 | Spearman et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4816224 | Vogel et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4838903 | Thomaides et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4838905 | Billiet et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4840838 | Wyss | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4868032 | Eian et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4874666 | Kubo et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4886058 | Brostrom et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4889764 | Chenoweth et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4904385 | Wessling et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4911789 | Rieunier et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4917714 | Kinsley, Jr. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4919753 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4933129 | Huykman | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4983434 | Sassa | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5022964 | Crane et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5027781 | Lewis | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5034040 | Walcott et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5042468 | Lambert | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5045210 | Chen et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5057368 | Largman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5066538 | Huykman | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5068141 | Kubo et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5080791 | Sims | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5082476 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5087278 | Suzuki | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5089119 | Day et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5092911 | Williams et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5104537 | Stifelman et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108827 | Gessner | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5110330 | Loughran | May 1992 | A |
| 5131387 | French et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5147553 | Waite | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5147721 | Baron et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5167764 | Nielsen et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5167765 | Nielsen et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5190569 | McGrath | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5190812 | Joseph et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5208098 | Stover | May 1993 | A |
| 5212131 | Belding | May 1993 | A |
| 5246474 | Greatorex | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5246772 | Manning | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5275743 | Miller et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5283106 | Seiler et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5284704 | Kochesky et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5302443 | Manning et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5307796 | Kronzer et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5334446 | Quantrille et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5336286 | Alexander et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5354603 | Erede et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5364456 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5366631 | Adiletta | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5380580 | Rogers et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5405682 | Shawyer et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5415676 | Tokar et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5436980 | Weeks et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5454945 | Spearman | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5458960 | Nieminen et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5468572 | Zguris et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5472467 | Pfeffer | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5486410 | Groeger et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5508079 | Grant et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5508093 | Mehdorn | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5509340 | Kawamura | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5545453 | Grant | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5545475 | Korleski | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5575832 | Boyd | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5580459 | Powers et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5581647 | Onishi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5584784 | Wu | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5597645 | Pike et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5605746 | Groeger et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607735 | Brown | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5616408 | Oleszczuk et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5620641 | Berger | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5620785 | Watt et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5633082 | Berger | May 1997 | A |
| 5643467 | Romanco | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5643653 | Griesbach, III et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5645057 | Watt et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5645689 | Ruf et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5645690 | Cox, Jr. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5662728 | Groeger | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5665235 | Gildersleeve et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5667562 | Midkiff | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672399 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672415 | Sawyer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5677058 | Neal et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5679042 | Varona | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5705119 | Takeuchi et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5709735 | Midkiff et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5711878 | Ogata et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5721180 | Pike et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5728187 | Kern et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5728298 | Hamlin | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5753002 | Glucksman | May 1998 | A |
| 5755963 | Sugiura et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5779847 | Groeger | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5783505 | Duckett et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5785725 | Cusick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5792711 | Roberts | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5795835 | Bruner et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5800586 | Cusick et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5800884 | D'Anna et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5804286 | Quantrille et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5820646 | Gillingham et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5837627 | Halabisky et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5840245 | Coombs et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5853439 | Gieseke et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5885390 | Alkire et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5911213 | Ahlborn et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5932104 | Kawamura | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935879 | Helwig et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935883 | Pike | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5948344 | Cusick et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5952252 | Shawver et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5954962 | Adiletta | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5965468 | Marmon et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972166 | Helwig et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972477 | Kim et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5976998 | Sandor et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5981410 | Hansen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5989432 | Gildersleeve et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5989688 | Barge et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993501 | Cusick et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993943 | Bodaghi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6007608 | Johnson | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6007898 | Kim et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6013587 | Truong et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6024782 | Freund et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6041782 | Angadjivand et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045597 | Choi | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6071419 | Beier et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6071641 | Zguris | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6077391 | Girondi | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6099726 | Gembolis et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6103181 | Berger | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6103643 | Forsten | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110249 | Medcalf et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6136058 | Miller | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139595 | Herman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6143049 | Gieseke et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6143441 | Zguris et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6146436 | Hollingsworth et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6152120 | Julazadeh | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6156682 | Fletemier et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6156842 | Hoenig et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165572 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6169045 | Pike et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171355 | Gieseke et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171369 | Schultink et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171684 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174603 | Berger | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183536 | Schultink et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6186992 | Roe et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6187073 | Gieseke et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6190768 | Turley et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6197709 | Tsai et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6200669 | Marmon et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6203713 | Tanny | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6241886 | Kitagawa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251224 | Dong | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6264044 | Meyering | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267252 | Amsler | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267843 | Helwig et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6290739 | Gieseke et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6300261 | Young et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6301887 | Gorel et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306539 | Zguris | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6316107 | Lubnin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6330883 | Berger | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6351078 | Wang et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6352947 | Haley et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6355076 | Gieseke et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
| 6355079 | Sorvari et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6364976 | Fletemier et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6365001 | Helwig et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6372004 | Schultink et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6384369 | Stenersen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6406789 | McDaniel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6409785 | Smithies et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6409787 | Smithies et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6419721 | Hunter | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6419839 | Cox et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6420626 | Erspamer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6428610 | Tsai et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6440192 | Guerin et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6458456 | Zainiev et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6479147 | Lubnin et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6488811 | Dong | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6495286 | Zguris et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6503447 | Mondjian et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6511774 | Tsukuda et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6517612 | Crouch et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6521321 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6528439 | Stokes et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6530366 | Geiger et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6530969 | Gieseke et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6540801 | Gieseke et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6541114 | Katou et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6547860 | Buchwald et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6555489 | Pfeffer | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6576034 | Berger | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6607997 | Cox et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6613704 | Arnold et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6616723 | Berger | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6624099 | Shah | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| H2086 | Amsler | Oct 2003 | H |
| 6645388 | Sheikh-Ali | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6649547 | Arnold et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6652614 | Gieseke et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6653381 | Thames et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6673864 | Patel et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6682576 | Kiyotani et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6682809 | Van Rheenen | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6695148 | Homonoff et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6705270 | Rau et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6706086 | Emig et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6723142 | Emerson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6723669 | Clark et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6740142 | Buettner et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6743273 | Chung et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6770356 | O'Donnell et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6797377 | DeLucia et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6815383 | Arnold | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6818037 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6821321 | Chinn et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6821672 | Zguris | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6835311 | Koslow | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6848866 | McGinn | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6849330 | Morin et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6858057 | Healey | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6860917 | Henrichsen et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6866692 | Emerson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6872431 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6872674 | Williams et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6874641 | Clary | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6875249 | Gogins | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6878191 | Escaffre et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6883321 | Fornof | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6916752 | Berrigan et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6923182 | Angadjivand et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6924028 | Chung et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6926961 | Roth | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6936554 | Singer | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6939386 | Sato et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6939492 | Jackson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6942711 | Faulkner et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6955708 | Julos et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6955775 | Chung et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6966940 | Krisko et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6991113 | Nakajima | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7008144 | McGinn | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7029516 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7037569 | Curro et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7049254 | Bansal et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7070640 | Chung et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7090715 | Chung et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7094270 | Schultink et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7115150 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7125470 | Graef et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7309372 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7314497 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7520994 | Dong et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7985344 | Dema et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8021455 | Adamek et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8021457 | Dema et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8057567 | Webb et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8267681 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 20010000375 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
| 20010004061 | Popoff et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20020007167 | Dan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020013111 | Dugan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020083690 | Emig et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116910 | Berger | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020121194 | Buchwald et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020127939 | Hwo et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020193030 | Yao | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030008214 | Zguris | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030019193 | Chinn et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030022575 | Yoneda et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030039815 | Roth | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030082979 | Bean et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030084788 | Fraser, Jr. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030087568 | Kinn et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030089092 | Bause et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030096549 | Ortega et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030106294 | Chung et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030109190 | Geel | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119406 | Abuto et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139110 | Nagaoka et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030145569 | Sato et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148691 | Pelham, Sr. et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030150820 | Dussaud et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211799 | Yao et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040116026 | Kubose et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040134355 | Kasmark | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040192141 | Yang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040221436 | Ortega et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040242108 | Russell et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040255783 | Graham et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050026526 | Verdegan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109683 | Joyce et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050130031 | Zguris | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050160711 | Yang | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050210844 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050214188 | Rohrbach et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050233665 | Groten et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060009106 | Nishimura et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060074171 | Bach et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060094320 | Chen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060096263 | Kahlbaugh et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060096932 | Dema et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060101796 | Kern et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121811 | Mangold et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060137317 | Bryner et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060207932 | Hajek et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230731 | Kalayei et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242933 | Webb et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060266701 | Dickerson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070039300 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070227359 | Choi | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080073296 | Dema et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20090044702 | Adamek et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090050578 | Israel et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090266759 | Green | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 4344819 | Jul 1994 | DE |
| 0340763 | Nov 1989 | EP |
| 0451544 | Oct 1991 | EP |
| 0451554 | Oct 1991 | EP |
| 0465203 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 1036585 | Sep 2000 | EP |
| 0844861 | Mar 2002 | EP |
| 1171495 | Mar 2003 | EP |
| 1118632 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 1532076 | May 2005 | EP |
| 1179673 | Dec 2005 | EP |
| 1141454 | Mar 2006 | EP |
| 1378283 | Apr 2007 | EP |
| WO-9741167 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| WO-9947211 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO-0103802 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO-0245098 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO-03080904 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004089509 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005120678 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005120678 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006052656 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006052732 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006089063 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO-2008103821 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO-2009088647 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “2.2 The Fourdrinier”, http://www.paper.org.uk/papertech/data/unit—03/2—mechanical—methods/2-2—fourdrinier . . . , (Sep. 24, 2007) (7 pgs). |
| Lennox-Kerr, “Advances in Textiles Technology”, International Newsletters Ltd., UK, vol. 153, 3 pgs (Sep. 2003). |
| Hinds, W, “Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles”, Second Edition, 3 pages (Copyright 1999). |
| Zhao, R, “An Investigation of Bicomponent Polpropylene/Poly (ethylene Terephthalate) Melt Blown Microfiber Nonwovens, A Dissertation”, Front cover, pp. i-xix, pp. 1-207, 3 Information pgs (Dec. 2001). |
| Hagewood, J., “Biocomponent Filtration: Variable Capacity Continuous Extended Area Filter”, International Fiber Journal, vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 58-67 (Feb. 1998). |
| “Cost Effective Emissions Solutions for Diesel Engines”, Donaldson Company brochure, 4 pgs (2004). |
| Dahiya, et al., “Dry-Laid Nonwovens”, http://www.engr.utk.edu/mse/pages/Textiles/Dry—Laid—Nonwovens.htm, 10 pgs (Apr. 2004). |
| “European Search Report”, EP 07119967.3, mailed May 6, 2008, 6 pgs. |
| “File History”, for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,538, filed Nov. 5, 2004, entitled “Filter Media and Structure”, 280 pgs. |
| “File History”, for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/381,010, filed May 1, 2006, entitled “Filter Medium and Breather Filter Structure”, 141 pgs. |
| “File History”, for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/986,377, filed Nov. 20, 2007, entitled “High Strength, High Capacity Filter Media and Structure”, 197 pgs. |
| “File History”, for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/035,150, filed Feb. 21, 2008, entitled “Filber Element and Method”, 220 pgs. |
| “File History”, for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,913, filed Jan. 27, 2010, entitled “Fibrous Media”, 141 pgs. |
| “File History”, for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,936, filed Jan. 27, 2010, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Forming a Fibrous Media”, 138 pgs. |
| “Filter Bag”, Nonwovens Industry, vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 5 and 68 (Mar. 1992). |
| “Filtration—Daiwabo and Kyowa Jointly Produce Microfiber Filter”, Nonwovens Markets, vol. 7, No. 4, p. 5 (Feb. 14, 1992). |
| “Final Office Action”, mailed May 23, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/036,022, “Formed Filter Element” (21 pages). |
| “HEPA & 95% DOP Panel Filters”, Donaldson Company Torit brochure, 4 pgs (2004). |
| “International Search Report”, mailed Aug. 29, 2008, PCT/US2008/054574, 11 pgs. |
| “International Search Report”, PCT/US2005/039793, mailed Mar. 23, 2006 (11 pgs). |
| “International Search Report”, PCT/US2007/00963, mailed Nov. 21, 2007 (14 pgs). |
| Puurtinen, “Multilayering of Fine Paper with 30 Layer Headbox and Roll and Blade Gap Former”, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Paper Technology Reports, Series A19 (May 14, 2004), 54 pgs. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, mailed Oct. 6, 2011 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/036,022, “Formed Filter Element ,” (40 pages). |
| “Restriction Requirement”, mailed Jul. 7, 2011 in co pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/036,022, “Formed Filter Element” (7 pages). |
| “Three-Dimensional Structure Incorporates Heterofil Fibre and Carbon Beads”, Nonwovens Report, International, No. 295, pp. 8-9 (Oct. 1995). |
| “KRATON Polymers Grade Range”, K0137 BRa-00E, Typical Properties Guide, KRATON Polymers Apr. 2001, 12 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130008006 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60903179 | Feb 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12036022 | Feb 2008 | US |
| Child | 13616559 | US |
